JBoss 7 and authentication of BlazeDS

Similar Questions

• Message violates guidelines send IPv6 on PTR 550 5.7.1 documents and authentication

  I use OS X Server (El Capitan) as my personal mail server. Everything is set up correctly. Mail works fine for everything except google gmail. This has happened for 2-3 years... whenever I have send emails to users of Gmail, I get "reviewed mail returned to sender" which explains "this message does not respect guidelines send IPv6 on PTR 550 5.7.1 records and authentication»

  How can this be repaired?

  I resolved to myself.

  After digging the question (there is a post in the communities of Apple Support by Paul Derby 'Blocks Google's IPv6 email receipt sent by OS X Server'), I found the hack to force postfix to use IPv4 only not for work.

  Instead of this, I found myself setting the configure IPv6 in the 'link-local only' in the advanced configuration of network Ethernet. (She had been established to 'Automatically', perhaps by default, when update OS X - Server some time ago.)

  I can now send to addresses gmail from my client devices without problem. However, it seems that the accessibility of the Internet is not working now and so I disabled it (a small price to pay).

• appleTV ask code appleID password and authentication circularly

  After the update to my iPhone I have asked me to use the double authentication code, I didn't have any idea what kind of nightmare is. I spent hours to go from one device to the other verification of passwords and authentication codes. The last of them is the Apple TV after this stupid innovation my appleTV ask my code AppleID password and authentication, then goes back to the request of the appleID. Basically, my AppleTV is useless. How can I eliminate the stupid passcode, which makes all my devices basically inaccessible?

  Turn off step 2 or two factors:

  For Apple ID - Apple Support two-factor authentication

  Frequently asked questions about the audit in two steps for Apple ID - Apple Support

  Others have reported problems with them when it is used with the Apple TV.

• I'm trying to install Office note 8.1 but get this error message immediately after you enter the serial number and authentication code.

  Remark Office OMR

  I've been remark office omr 8.1 installed on 32-bit windows vista (intel pentium DC) for the last year laptop. Now plan to move it to a more recent hardware and the OS.

  I'm trying to install Office note 8.1 on Windows 7 Home Basic 64 bit (on laptop AMD E450 DC base). But am getting this error message immediately after you enter the serial number and authentication code. I tried to install different versions of the .net Framework (from 1.1 to 4), but nothing seems to solve the problem.

  I even tried to install it in mode compatibality. but no luck.

  Here is the error message (between BEGIN and END lines)

  -BEGIN-

  An error occurred instantiating the object of authentication. Please restart your computer, and they run the Setup again.
  Error number = 2147219705

  Error = description

  ------ END--------

  Appreciate any help

  Thank you

  SJ

  Just for the follow-up of this: I have sent comments, and they responded in 20 minutes with:

  Please contact the Support of the note.  I'm sorry that you are experiencing this error, but it seems by the error message that you install note on a Windows 7 computer.  This error is caused by a Microsoft security update that was released in July 2011 for Windows 7 and caused upward to change our software.  Here is access to our Download Center for you to install the version 8.4 of note.  You will use your current serial number, license key and authentication code.
  They then provided a link to their Download Center where I could download 8.4
  E - mailer to * address email is removed from the privacy * and they will answer you. They have great customer service.

• You can change the manual HTTP Proxy on windows 8 / Surface Access Sever, Port, and authentication

  On the iPhone and iPad, you can go on the Wi - Fi connection settings tap modern you have.  After that, you change the HTTP Proxy in manual.  Once you press it, you can put server, port, and authentication that put my school.  You can access these things on Windows 8 or the Surface Pro?

  I need to connect to the school for Wi - Fi to access the internet.

  Hello

  To change the proxy settings, try the following steps.

  (a) press the Windows key + R, type inetcpl.cpl , and then press enter.

  (b) click on the connections tab, and then click LAN settings.

  (c) put check Mark to use a proxy server for your LAN check box.

  (d), and then make your changes in the settings. You can also click on the Advanced tab for more options.

  (e) after making necessary changes click on apply then Ok to save the changes.

  Check out the link for more information.

  To connect to the Internet
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-in/Windows-8/connect-Internet

  Hope this information helps. Answer the post with an up-to-date issue report to help you further.

• is it possible to use two external LDAP and authentication of external Table?

  Hi, is it possible to use both external LDAP and authentication of the external table?
  
  they all need two initialization blocks to access a session system variable, USER?
  
  Thank you

  Hello
  I don't think it's possible to impliment the LDAP authentication both extenal together. The reasons are,
  1. we cannot define two sources (LDAP and Extenal DB) in the same blocks of justine initialization user information.
  2. If two different (one for LDAP) initialization blocks and one for extenal DB are used, we cannot use variable USER twice it's a defined system variable.

  Thank you
  Swami

• is it possible to make the machine and authentication of users in the same permission profile?

  Hello

  I want to know is - it possible to machine authentication authentication of users arrive at the same time? Something like that...

  Condition

  IF (wired_802.1x and AD:externalgroup computer dommain EQUAL AND Some_domain_user_group EQUAL AD:exteranalgroup)

  Permissions

  then Vlan x

  Basically, I'm just checking a machine in the domain and user is valid only while he should be able to have full access.

  Any help will be of great value.

  Hello

  IF (wired_802.1x and AD:externalgroup computer dommain EQUAL AND Some_domain_user_group EQUAL AD:exteranalgroup)

  -Not possible

  As the authentication of the user and the machine occur in different contexts.

  ACS cannot check them both at the same time.

  With the help of MAR, you can, although club together and reach:

  "machine is part of the domain and user is valid only while he should be able to have full access"

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_secure_access_control_system/5.1/user/guide/users_id_stores.html#wp1235978

  Tips for MAR configuration:

  (1) set the client to authenticate user or computer.

  (2) create two rules in the authorization for the user and and the other for the machine (identity them using the ad group membership).

  (3) enable MAR on the AD on ACS configuration page and set the aging time.

  (4) in rule user, customize and use the condition "Has been authenticated machine" and the value is false.

  Rate if useful

• WLSEE and authentication PEAP + integration of ads by Win

  Can WLSE Express box users can be authenticated on the victory of the PEAP authentication (with digital certicficate) and integrated with Microsoft IIS and WIN AD server to authenticate users (without using the built-in AAA server)?

  Thank you

  WLSEE is not a 'controller' in the sense that it has a real-time control over what happens to your wireless users; It does just to push out to the APs models. If you say your APs AAA services are on your box of IAS (not IIS) instead of your WLSEE, that's where they look.

• Concept of the association and authentication?

  Hello, hope someone can enlighten me on that.  We have a WLC 5508 with some WAP (1131 and 1242).  Our wireless clients using Basic authentication against our AD certificate (i.e. the computer cert and cert user are required).  However, from time to time I see customers being linked but not authenticated as reported by the WLC.  Would it be possible, as indicated by some literature that a customer can be "associated with" after it is successfully authenticated?  Maybe I'm not quite clear on the concept.  Thanks in advance.

  Eric

  Hi Eric,.

  Clear as mud isn't

  I like to think of it that way, in the library on our campus

  There are hundreds of students more use laptop computers. If we look at the AP

  in this area, we could see 120 Associations for example, but we can only see 65

  Authentications. In this case are associated with laptops 55 users but not gone

  through the authentication process.

  Here is the explanation of Cisco;

  The Wireless Client Association

  In the process of customer binding, access points send tags announcing one or more SSID, flow of data and other information. The client sends a probe and scans all channels and listening responses to probes from the access roads and tags. The customer joins AP that has the strongest signal. If the signal becomes weak, the client repeats the scan to associate with another access point (this process is called roaming). During the association, the SSID, MAC address, and security settings are sent from the client to the access point and verified by the access point. Figure 3-6 illustrates the process of customer liaison.

  

  Figure 3-6 Association of the customer

  Association of the wireless to a selected access point client actually is the second step in a two-step process. First of all, authentication, then association must occur before a 802.11 client can pass traffic through the access point to another host on the network. The authentication of the client in this initial process is not the same as the network authentication (enter username and password for access to the network). The client authentication is simply the first step (followed by association) between the wireless client and the access point, and it establishes communication. The 802.11 standard specifies that two different authentication methods: open authentication and shared key authentication. Open authentication is simply the exchange of four packages of type "hello" without verification of client or access, to allow ease of connectivity. Shared key authentication uses a key defined static WEP, known between the client and access point, for verification. This same key might or might not be used to encrypt the data passing between a wireless client and an access point according to the configuration of the user.

  http://www.CiscoPress.com/articles/article.asp?p=1156068&seqNum=3

  See you soon!

  Rob

• 802.1 x and authentication methods

  Hello

  I got 5.2 ACS, Cisco 4507 switches and AD domain environment.
  Planning on running only computer authentication and no authentication of users.
  I have the following device types:

  1. Windows XP SP3 and higher on the AD domain
  2 devices with installed with third-party applicants because they are not natively
  support 802.1 x.

  If I don't know the type of device 2 and don't take into account that the type of device 1, I am able to simply configure
  802. 1 x for machine-based authentication against AD, without having to use a
  certificates at all?

  Device type 2 account, since the devices are not on the field and I did not
  want to manually enter the details in the TAS, can I use the certificate for authentication?

  Thank you

  Hello

  > Using PEAP wouldn't I need certificate installed on GBA? Or it may work without any certificate at all.

  [YEARS] Yes, you still need to certificate the GBA but it can be a self-signed certificate that you can do in 2 clicks on GBA itself. machines of OC client, you have to make sure you have the supplicant configured to not 'Validate server certificate"so that you don't have any other complication with CERT.

  / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Table Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 cm 5.4pt cm 0 5.4pt ; mso-para-margin : 0 cm ; mso-para-marge-bottom : .0001pt ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-bidi-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-bidi-theme-font : minor-bidi ;}

  > I thought for devices that not on the field, to load the certificate on the computer.

  If I had to have two devices of type 1 and 2, would it be possible to have domain authentication devices using the machine against the AD authentication and the field not devices authenticated using the certificate installed on each device?

  [YEARS] Yes, you can. No peripheral field could be authenticated simply by trusting to the CA that issued the certificate to the device. Imagine that you have this 'JEDI' certification of the unit. You can configure the ACS to validate authentications by trusted CA "JEDI". If a device tries to connect, it will send the certificate, the ACS simply checks the certificate authority that issued the certificate and if it is approved, it will accept authentication.

  In this scenario, you will need to use a method of methods that uses client certificates for authneitcation such as EAP - TLS.

  HTH,
  Tiago

  --

  If this helps you or answers to your question if it you please mark it as 'responded' or write it down, if other users can easily find it.

• Local use and authentication AD with ACS 5.6

  I have an ACS 5.6 unit configured to use AD authentication for my default network access and rules. It works very well.

  I tried to implement some features, put them in a group and give only locally defined ACS to users access to these devices.

  Problem, after you have created the local accounts on ACS creates a group of local identity, and trying to authenticate with a camera, I always get "object not found in the identity store.

  Is there a way to have the hybrid authentication like that? How do we?

  Hi Colin,

  One thing that comes to mind is "sequence of identity store. Ensure that you have "internal users" listed in there otherwise that demand would never be mapped against the internal users.

  I also want to double check the source of identity under default device admin or any service that you created. Ensure that internal users.

  Take a look at the document below for more details on the identity store sequence.

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/103901/ACS-5x-identity-store-se...

  Kind regards

  Kanwal

  Note: Please check if they are useful.

• PIX V6.2 of lists of access and authentication

  We have a PIX 501 internal v6.2 on an intranet and you want to allow some subnets and other IP of specific hosts through high security (inside) to low-security side (outside) without authentication or authorization.

  However, at the same time, we want to authenticate some other users the same path and apply an access of our v2.6 CiscoSecure ACS list.

  We use http authentication.

  How do I combine these two different requirements on the inside interface

  e.g. allowed tcp 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0 any eq 1022 and

  (if it is authenticated) permit tcp host 10.120.10.1 any eq 8051

  We have a similar setup working on a router using the firewall feature set proxy authentication, the access list has static entries and changes dynamically when users are authenticated with their conditions of access.

  Do not use an ACL on the inside interface to achieve this. Rather, set you ACLs to include authentication for all traffic from this host out.

  Allow Access-list auth_user host ip 10.120.10.1 one

  This means that the user cannot run ALL the traffic out until he receives the authentication. The host can do this by opening a web browser for what anyone outside and giving the appropriate credentials firewall. Or FTP for what anyone outside... Or telnet to what anyone on the outside.

  When the ACS service validates the credentials of the users, pass back the ACL for this user to define exactly what you want and what you want to deny. If you only allow outbound TCP/8501, then all other traffic is implicitly denied. The ACL by user like any other access-list. This will not require an ACL to be bound inside the interface.

  -Shannon

• WLC 4402 and authentication Web comments

  I've set up a WLAN guest who is using Web authentication to access the Internet. Layer 2 is open with broadcast SSID authentication. Guest users can connect to the LWAP, and when they try to open a web page, they are redirected to the Web Auth page automatically.

  The problem is that the redirect url contains the host name of the WLC and not the IP address of the virtual interface.

  https://hostname/login.

  As my DHCP server is distributing DNS servers for users invited on the Internet, the host name cannot be resolved and the page does not appear. If I replace the host name in the url with the virtual IP (1.1.1.1), the page appears correctly.

  The WLC is running version 6 software. Any suggestions?

  Well, the DNS must be able to resolve the name that you typed on the virtual interface configuration page.

  So it could be a name. This name is traore that the internal DNS should resolve so that he can go directly to the 1.1.1.1 page

  If you do not type anything in this box then it will not redirect as expected, or even if you type a different name which should be resolved by DNS, then it will fail in most of the time.

  Try to make that change because the certificate is the locally generated by the WLC your PC and most of the PC will display a certificate number since this is a Selfsigned certificate... you just need to accept that and then go normally.

  Meanwhile take a look at this document, which is really useful:http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6366/products_tech_note09186a0080a38c11.shtml

  Let us know the result.

• Orchestrator device access and authentication of the rights on the workflow

  Hey all,.

  I had a strange problem with the last device Orchestrator:

  Sign-ON the value in the device, I can see the vCO server in the web client, can start the flow of work, all good. But when I try to change a worklof access rights in the vCO client, I open the switch, push enter the filter field or a substring to find a group, but the selector only say loading and is never showing all groups.

  So, I tried to set the AD authentication. Now, I can see my ad groups in the selector window. But I can no longer see the vCO server in the web client and see not all workflows.

  I checked the site configuration vCO, my user is part of the group admin vCO. I also checked the registration of the Oct on the vCenter server. I can see the extension of vCO beeing is properly registered in the CROWD.

  Also workflows are running and are able to run on the vCenter server. I just do not see and cannot run from the vSphere client.

  If anyone has any idea why

  (a) I see no groups in the access rights selector add when SSO authentication? It worked only once in the past

  or

  (b) why I can't see the vCO server and workflow in the web client even if my user is part of the group admin vco?

  Thank you!

  Tim

  Which SSO/vCO/Web Client versions/versions do you use?

  I remember there were bugs related to the AD Setup mode of windows authentication integrated (supposed to be fixed at some point). You can try to add your ad as a type of Server LDAP identity source just to check if the groups will appear in the user interface?

• VMWare View 5.1 and authentication RADIUS - password problem

  I use Trustwave for 2-factor authentication on a Server View 5.1.1.  The Server Proxy of Trustwave requires that you enter your password to Active Directory followed by a comma, then the access provided by Trustwave code.  After that, you get the VMWare View normal login where you have to put your password in Active Directory.  Is there a way to remove the comma and the password of the first login box and simply pass the Active Directory password for the 2nd dialog box?  See the following two dialog boxes.

  NOTE: All works fine, but it is confusing for the user to enter his password to Active Directory twice.

  NOTE: When I check the box in the authenticators, manage, use the same username and password for Windows and RADIUS authentication, I naturally get an error because it is passing the password to Active Directory, the comma and the password of Trustwave at the 2nd fret of the connection.

  taopiglet wrote:

  ... Is there a way to remove the comma and the password of the first login box and simply pass the Active Directory password for the 2nd dialog box?

  ...

  Laughing out loud

  What happens with multiple RADIUS servers, is that the first guest username and password in AD. There is then a Challenge to get the access token code. In this case, you can configure view to ignore the next AD password prompt that the view can take the original RADIUS (AD password) authentication code and use it for the part of the AD authentication.

  A certain RADIUS vendors operate in this way.

  If the RADIUS of Trustwave server can be configured to do a Challenge of access, it would be a more standard approach to try to analyze the fields password in this way.

  I can see why this would not be irritating to users.

  Select this option.