JOIN the SQL clause

Hello

I have a small question:

INNER JOIN can be written with just the keyword JOIN?

For example,.

INNER JOIN table_b b ON a.col = b.col

OR

JOIN table_b b ON a.col = b.col

Thank you

Yes it is JOIN table_b b WE a.col = b.col or INNER JOIN table_b b ON a.col = b.col

Published by: orant575 on June 28, 2009 13:27

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

any case when and the sql clause
Hello:
What follows is my sql clause:
SELECT T.*, b.name
OF dbtest1 t
LEFT OUTER JOIN dbtest b ON t.NO = b.empno
WHERE t.ChineseName like '% "| : ChineseName | ' %' AND b.name like "%" | : name | » %'
ORDER BY t.ChineseName

The main problem is that I want to check the b.name if it is null, it can be passed as function NVL, so I try using case when, but it does not work.
When there are the b.name in where clause, the columns of result will not include data without b.name (or implies the b.name is NULL); And that
the result data are not entirely accurate.
is it possible to use the case when it is implemented in the following code snippet:

-case when b.name is not NULL then b.name like "%" | : name | » %'
Else b.name = NULL (b.name = b.name does not seem to work on the analysis of data zero)
end

Thank you very much.
962769 wrote:
The main problem is the table is the form of the cross, and the like clause will filter the
data without a name. Basically, it should show the empty columns, however, it won't.
so, when I test the sql code, I fhound Like "%" | b.Name | ' %' will not get the data when the original dbtest1 table data
has no id corresponding to the BD test. It seems pointless to go the LEFT OUTER JOIN.

Thank you
```
WHERE t.ChineseName like '%'||:ChineseName||'%'
AND  (
        b.name like '%'||:name||'%'
       or b.empno is null
    )
```

outer join on query with the GOLD clause

Hi all, I have a problem outerjoining a clause or a request with
Here's my data

WITH table1 AS
(
 SELECT  'test' txt1, 'pak' txt2, 'ced' txt3, 'su' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
 SELECT  null txt1, 'pak' txt2, 'ced2' txt3, 'su2' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
 SELECT  null txt1, NULL txt2, 'ced3' txt3, 'su3' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
 SELECT  null txt1, NULL txt2, null txt3, 'su3' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
 SELECT  'text5' txt1, NULL txt2, null txt3, 'su3' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
 SELECT  null txt1, NULL txt2, null txt3, null txt4 FROM dual 


)
,table2 AS
(
 SELECT 111 pid, 'test' txt1, 'pak4' txt2, 'ced' txt3, 'su' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
 SELECT 222 pid, 'test1' txt1, 'pak' txt2, 'ced2' txt3, 'su2' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
 SELECT 333 pid, 'test2' txt1, 'pak3' txt2, 'ced3' txt3, 'su4' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
  SELECT 444 pid, 'test2' txt1, 'pak3' txt2, 'ced4' txt3, 'su3' txt4 FROM dual 

)
SELECT b.pid, a.*
from table1 a, table2 b
WHERE (a.txt1 = b.txt1 OR
       a.txt1 IS NULL AND a.txt2=b.txt2 OR
       Nvl(a.txt2, a.txt1) IS NULL AND a.txt3 = b.txt3 OR
       Nvl(a.txt2, a.txt1) IS NULL  AND a.txt3 IS NULL AND a.txt4 = b.txt4
       )

as you can see I am attaching the table 1 and table 2. I join with txt1, if txt1 is null, then join by txt2, if null, then reach by txt3 and so on.
the above produces this output code

PID     TXT1     TXT2     TXT3     TXT4
===     ====     ===   ==== ====
111     test     pak      ced     su
222             pak      ced2     su2
333                     ced3     su3
444                          su3

This output is partially correct. only 4 lines were in display and two has been left out

 SELECT  'text5' txt1, NULL txt2, null txt3, 'su3' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
 SELECT  null txt1, NULL txt2, null txt3, null txt4 FROM dual

I tried to use the outer join, but oracle will complain that I can't use outerjoin with the GOLD clause.

can someone modify my query to display the output below?

PID     TXT1     TXT2     TXT3     TXT4
===    ====      ===   ====  ====
111     test     pak      ced     su
222             pak      ced2     su2
333                     ced3     su3
444                          su3
NULL  NULL   NULL    NULL   NULL
     test5

Not sure you can do it with the style of the Oracle of outer joins, but open ANSI style joins is simple, in fact exactly as you had it.

SQL> set null null;
SQL> WITH table1 AS (
  2   SELECT  'test' txt1, 'pak' txt2, 'ced' txt3, 'su' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
  3   SELECT  null txt1, 'pak' txt2, 'ced2' txt3, 'su2' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
  4   SELECT  null txt1, NULL txt2, 'ced3' txt3, 'su3' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
  5   SELECT  null txt1, NULL txt2, null txt3, 'su3' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
  6   SELECT  'text5' txt1, NULL txt2, null txt3, 'su3' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
  7   SELECT  null txt1, NULL txt2, null txt3, null txt4 FROM dual),
  8  table2 AS (
  9   SELECT 111 pid, 'test' txt1, 'pak4' txt2, 'ced' txt3, 'su' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
 10   SELECT 222 pid, 'test1' txt1, 'pak' txt2, 'ced2' txt3, 'su2' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
 11   SELECT 333 pid, 'test2' txt1, 'pak3' txt2, 'ced3' txt3, 'su4' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
 12   SELECT 444 pid, 'test2' txt1, 'pak3' txt2, 'ced4' txt3, 'su3' txt4 FROM dual)
 13  SELECT b.pid, a.*
 14  from table1 a
 15     LEFT JOIN table2 b
 16        ON (a.txt1 = b.txt1 OR
 17            a.txt1 IS NULL AND a.txt2=b.txt2 OR
 18            Nvl(a.txt2, a.txt1) IS NULL AND a.txt3 = b.txt3 OR
 19            Nvl(a.txt2, a.txt1) IS NULL  AND a.txt3 IS NULL AND a.txt4 = b.txt4);

       PID TXT1   TXT2   TXT3   TXT4
---------- ------ ------ ------ ------
       111 test   pak    ced    su
       222 null   pak    ced2   su2
       333 null   null   ced3   su3
       444 null   null   null   su3
null       text5  null   null   su3
null       null   null   null   null

John

Outer joins and null in the 'where' clause condition

Hi people,
Please help me on this.
Here's my query.
with x
(select 'a' as a dual union all col1)
Select 'b' as col1 of union double all the
Select 'c' as double col1
),
y as
(
Select 'b' as col2 from dual Union all the
Select 'c' as col2 from dual Union all the
Select would be "as col2 from dual Union all the"
Select 'e' as col2 from dual
)
Select * x y right outer join
on x.col1 = y.col2 and y.col2 is null
Get all the lines of 'COL1' as null. Why like this?

Just add the condition to the WHERE clause for example
```
WITH x AS
(SELECT 'a' AS col1 FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT 'b' AS col1 FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT 'c' AS col1 FROM dual
),
y AS
(
SELECT 'b' AS col2 FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT 'c' AS col2 FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT 'd' AS col2 FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT 'e' AS col2 FROM dual
)
SELECT * FROM x LEFT OUTER JOIN y
ON x.col1=y.col2                     ----want to add "and y.col2 is null " condition to get value "a"
where y.col2 is null
```

Syntax of UPDATE of Oracle with the JOIN and the WHERE clause

I need to update one of my paintings and can't seem to get the syntax right. I tried 4 different approaches, but does not have a chance. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Attempt #1: Error: not correctly completed SQL command
UPDATE TESTDTA.F4941 SET TESTDTA.F4941.RSDSTN=TESTDTA.F4981.FHRTDQ,TESTDTA.F4941.RSUMD1=TESTDTA.F4981.FHUOM FROM TESTDTA.F4941 INNER JOIN TESTDTA.F4981 ON TESTDTA.F4941.RSSHPN = TESTDTA.F4981.FHSHPN WHERE TESTDTA.F4941.RSSHPN = 647143 AND TESTDTA.F4941.RSDSTN = 0 AND TESTDTA.F4941.RSADDJ > 110365 AND TESTDTA.F4981.FHCGC1 = 'DIS';
Try #2: Error report: SQL error: ORA-00904: "TESTDTA." "" F4981 ". "' FHUOM ': invalid identifier 00904. 00000 - '% s: invalid identifier '.
UPDATE (SELECT TESTDTA.F4941 FROM TESTDTA.F4941 INNER JOIN TESTDTA.F4981 ON TESTDTA.F4941.RSSHPN = TESTDTA.F4981.FHSHPN WHERE TESTDTA.F4941.RSSHPN = 647143 AND TESTDTA.F4941.RSDSTN = 0 AND TESTDTA.F4941.RSADDJ > 110365 AND TESTDTA.F4981.FHCGC1 = 'DIS') SET TESTDTA.F4941.RSDSTN=TESTDTA.F4981.FHRTDQ,TESTDTA.F4941.RSUMD1=TESTDTA.F4981.FHUOM

Try #3: Error report: SQL error: ORA-00904: "TESTDTA." "' F4941 ': invalid identifier 00904. 00000 - '% s: invalid identifier '.
UPDATE (SELECT * FROM TESTDTA.F4941 INNER JOIN TESTDTA.F4981 ON TESTDTA.F4941.RSSHPN = TESTDTA.F4981.FHSHPN WHERE TESTDTA.F4941.RSSHPN = 647143 AND TESTDTA.F4941.RSDSTN = 0 AND TESTDTA.F4941.RSADDJ > 110365 AND TESTDTA.F4981.FHCGC1 = 'DIS') SET TESTDTA.F4941.RSDSTN=TESTDTA.F4981.FHRTDQ,TESTDTA.F4941.RSUMD1=TESTDTA.F4981.FHUOM;

Try #4: Error: ORA-00925: Missing keyword 00925. 00000 - "missing IN the keyword"
MERGE TESTDTA.F4941 USING TESTDTA.F4981 ON (TESTDTA.F4941.RSSHPN = TESTDTA.F4981.FHSHPN AND TESTDTA.F4941.RSSHPN = 647143 AND TESTDTA.F4941.RSDSTN = 0 AND TESTDTA.F4941.RSADDJ > 110365 AND TESTDTA.F4981.FHCGC1 = 'DIS' ) WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET TESTDTA.F4941.RSDSTN=TESTDTA.F4981.FHRTDQ ,TESTDTA.F4941.RSUMD1=TESTDTA.F4981.FHUOM;

Finally managed to do work, adding DISTINCT to select. I have pasted the SQL error in Google to begin with. Laughing out loud!

Code snippet work for anyone who comes across this thread...

MERGE INTO TESTDTA. F4941 DST

USING (SELECT DISTINCT TESTDTA. F4941. RSSHPN,

TESTDTA. F4941. RSDSTN,

TESTDTA. F4941. RSUMD1,

TESTDTA. F4941. RSADDJ,

TESTDTA. F4981. FHSHPN,

TESTDTA. F4981. FHRTDQ,

TESTDTA. F4981. FHUOM,

TESTDTA. F4981. FHCGC1

OF TESTDTA. F4941

JOIN INTERNAL TESTDTA. F4981

ON TESTDTA. F4941. RSSHPN = TESTDTA. F4981. FHSHPN

WHERE - TESTDTA. F4941. RSSHPN = 647143 AND

TESTDTA. F4941. RSDSTN = 0

AND TESTDTA. F4941. RSADDJ > 110365

AND TESTDTA. F4981. FHCGC1 = 'SAY') CBC

on (DST. RSSHPN = SRC. FHSHPN)

When matched then update

SET DST. RSDSTN = SRC. FHRTDQ, SUMMER TIME. RSUMD1 = SRC. FHUOM;

Thanks to everyone who helped with this.

PL/SQL cursor loop... error IN the necessary clause... but several lines

Oracle 11 g 2 Linux x86_64
Hi all

I do turn the PL/SQL block below, but get the error below. I know, the INTO clause can be used only when a single line will be returned. In this case, I know that it returns multiple lines, so why he asked to use the INTO clause?
DECLARE
v_object VARCHAR2 (10): = "TABLE";
v_schema VARCHAR2 (30): = 'TEST ';
CURSOR tblsze_cur IS
SELECT table_name
FROM dba_tables
Owner WHERE = 'TEST '.
AND (IN) table_name
"T1"
"T2."
"T3");
BEGIN
FOR tbl_rec IN tblsze_cur
LOOP
Select * from
Table (dbms_space. OBJECT_GROWTH_TREND
(v_schema, tbl_rec.table_name, v_object)) ;
END LOOP;
END;
/
Select * from table (dbms_space. OBJECT_GROWTH_TREND
*
ERROR at line 21:
ORA-06550: line 21, column 3:
PLS-00428: an INTO clause in this SELECT statement

It would be something more like this (untested)...

Set serverout on

create type object_growth_trend_row as object)
validating TIMESTAMP,
space_usage NUMBER,
space_alloc NUMBER,
quality VARCHAR (20))
/

Create type object_growth_trend_table as table of the object_growth_trend_row
/

DECLARE
number of r;
We varchar2 (30): = 'SCOTT ';
TYPE nmtbl IS TABLE OF THE all_tables.table_name%TYPE;
tNom nmtbl;
tgrowth object_growth_trend_table;
CURSOR c1 IS
SELECT table_name
From all_tables
Owner WHERE we =
AND table_name in ('EMP', 'Department');
growth of cursor (tablename in varchar2) is
Select *.
table (dbms_space.object_growth_trend (tablename, 'TABLE'));
BEGIN
OPEN c1;
FETCH c1 COLLECT LOOSE tNom;
CLOSE c1;
BECAUSE me IN tNom. FIRST... tNom. LAST
LOOP
r: = 0;
dbms_output.put_line (' growth for table: ' | tname (i));
FOR g IN growth (tname (i))
LOOP
r: = r + 1;
dbms_output.put_line ('Timestamp: ' | g.timePoint |') Use: ' | g.space_usage);
END LOOP;
DBMS_OUTPUT. Put_line (' found lines: ' | r);
END LOOP;
END;
/

I just tested this in my SYS schema (although you should not create objects in SYS.) and got...

For table growth: EMP

EXCEPTION in the treatment of the Charles - code:-14551 msg: ORA-14551: cannot perform a DML operation inside a query

Timestamp: 3 July 13 09.15.27.250000 use: 5332

Found lines: 1

For table growth: DEPT

EXCEPTION in the treatment of the Charles - code:-14551 msg: ORA-14551: cannot perform a DML operation inside a query

Timestamp: 3 July 13 09.15.27.282000 use: 4846

Found lines: 1

Not sure why it's up the DML operation... which seems inner exception to the dbms_space package. Even if I just run it directly in sys like this:

SQL > SELECT *.
2. IN the TABLE (dbms_space.object_growth_trend ('SYS', ' $', TAB 'TABLE'));

AFTER SPACE_USAGE SPACE_ALLOC QUALITY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ----------- --------------------
3 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED

4 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED
JULY 5, 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED
6 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED
7 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED
8 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED
9 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED
10 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED
JULY 11, 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED
12 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED
13 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED
14 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED
15 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED
16 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED
17 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED
18 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED
19 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED
20 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED
21 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED
22 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED
23 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED
24 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED
25 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 INTERPOLATED
26 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 GOOD
27 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 GOOD
28 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 GOOD
29 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 GOOD
30 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 GOOD
31 JULY 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 GOOD
1ST AUGUST 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 GOOD
2 AUGUST 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 GOOD
3 AUGUST 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 PLANNED
4 AUGUST 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 PLANNED
5 AUGUST 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 PLANNED
6 AUGUST 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 PLANNED
7 AUGUST 13 09.19.01.956000 10342201 24117248 PLANNED

36 selected lines.

EXCEPTION in the treatment of the Charles - code:-14551 msg: ORA-14551: cannot perform a DML operation inside a query

... She still throws the exception.

Doesn't seem like a package of well designed if the types are provided only in the package and not as objects of database, which are required to be used in SQL based in pipeline.

Need help with the condition join in SQL
Hi all -

I need to ask for help with this query:

Create table user_tab_col_test (varchar2 (30) from table_name, column_name varchar2 (30), data_type varchar2 (30));

Insert into user_tab_col_test (table_name, column_name, data_type) values ('table1', 'column1', 'varchar2')
Insert into user_tab_col_test (table_name, column_name, data_type) values ('Column2', 'table1', 'varchar2')
Insert into user_tab_col_test (table_name, column_name, data_type) values ("Column3", 'table1', 'varchar2')
Insert into user_tab_col_test (table_name, column_name, data_type) values ('column4', 'table1', 'varchar2')
Insert into user_tab_col_test (table_name, column_name, data_type) values ("column1", "table2", 'varchar2')
Insert into user_tab_col_test (table_name, column_name, data_type) values ('table2', 'column2', 'varchar2')
Insert into user_tab_col_test (table_name, column_name, data_type) values ('table2', "Column3", 'varchar2')
Insert into user_tab_col_test (table_name, column_name, data_type) values ('table2', 'column4', 'varchar2')
Commit;

Create table all_cons_columns_test (varchar2 (30) from table_name, column_name varchar2 (30), constraint_name varchar2 (30))

Insert into all_cons_columns_test (table_name, column_name, constraint_name) values ("table1", "column1", "primary")
Insert into all_cons_columns_test (table_name, column_name, constraint_name) values ("table1", "column1", "secondary")
Commit;

This is my query and the current result:

Select u.table_name, u.column_name, c.constraint_name
Of user_tab_col_test u
Outer join all_cons_columns_test c left
On (u.table_name = c.table_name
AND U.COLUMN_NAME = C.COLUMN_NAME
AND C.CONSTRAINT_NAME IN ('main'))
order of U.table_name, U.COLUMN_NAME;

TABLE_NAME COLUMN_NAME, CONSTRAINT_NAME
------------------ --------------------- ----------------------------
Table1 primary Column1
Table1 Column2
Table 1 Column3
Table2 Column1
Table2 Column2

Three questions:
(1) I don't want to return results where table_name = "table1". I can't get this to work.
(2) is my proper request and this is the best way to return my desired results? For example, I want all of the columns of user_tab_col_test and I want to only display the constraint_name from all_cons_columns_test argument if the argument constraint_name = 'primary '.
(3) will be the synatx be the same if I need to join a third table to all_cons_columns_test?

Any advice/suggestions are appreciated-
John

Published by: user703358 on January 11, 2013 20:57

Published by: user703358 on January 11, 2013 21:48
Hi, John,.

user703358 wrote:
Hi all -

I need to ask for help with this query:

Create table user_tab_col_test (varchar2 (30) from table_name, column_name varchar2 (30), data_type varchar2 (30));

Insert into user_tab_col_test (table_name, column_name, data_type) values ('table1', 'column1', 'varchar2')
Insert into user_tab_col_test (table_name, column_name, data_type) values ('Column2', 'table1', 'varchar2')...

Thanks for posting the CREATE TABLE and INSERT.
It is more useful if you post the code that can be run without modification. You did not semicolons after INSERTION instructions.

Three questions:
(1) I don't want to return results where table_name = "table1". I can't get this to work.

What have you tried? Post your best attempt.
Here's one way:
```
SELECT    u.table_name
,        u.column_name
,        c.constraint_name
FROM             user_tab_col_test      u
LEFT OUTER JOIN  all_cons_columns_test  c
                        ON    u.table_name     = c.table_name
               AND   u.column_name     = c.column_name
               AND   c.constraint_name IN ('primary')
WHERE       u.table_name     = 'table1'          --  *****  NEW  *****
ORDER BY  u.table_name
,            u.column_name
;
```
You would not put this condition in the clause; who controls what is considered as a match between the tables, and "u LEFT OUTER JOIN c" means show all lines of u, even if they do not have a match in the c.

(2) is my proper request and this is the best way to return my desired results? For example, I want all of the columns of user_tab_col_test and I want to only display the constraint_name from all_cons_columns_test argument if the argument constraint_name = 'primary '.

Basically, this application is very well.
It displays all the columns of user_tab_col_test; missing data_type. Just add u.data_type to the SELECT clause, or change the SELECT clause
```
SELECT    u.*
,         c.constraint_name
```
(3) will be the synatx be the same if I need to join a third table to all_cons_columns_test?

Do you mean "" * add * one-third * column * to all_cons_columns_test '? "
It depends on what results you want. Post new CREATE TABLE and INSERT and instructions the results you want new data.
Most likely, the basic structure of what you've written will remain exactly the same.

Reference SQL Loader Bind Variables in the when Clause

Support for SQL: SQL * Loader: version 8.0.6.3.0 (don't ask, it runs on Oracle EBS 11i...)

I have a case where my sample data looks like:

HD00100001002
SM00100002CHAPS   99999999999                     20120906GBP0000000000001000000000001

and another file

HD00100001001
SM00100002GBP0000000000001000000000001

Essentially, I need to apply another "IN" clause for each record of SM depends on the ack_type (char 13 on HD recording), either 1 or 2

I tried setting up the ack_type with a variable binding but find how to reference.

Example of control file:

--  $Header: test.ctl
--

LOAD DATA
REPLACE

-- Record Type HD : File Header
INTO TABLE  test_table
WHEN rec_id_no = 'HD'
TRAILING NULLCOLS
(rec_no                 RECNUM,
 hdr_line               CONSTANT 'H',
 rec_id_no              POSITION(1:2)   CHAR,
 file_number            POSITION(3:5)   CHAR,
 sequence_number        POSITION(6:10)  CHAR,
 status                 POSITION(11:12) CHAR,
 ack_type               POSITION(13:13) ":ack_type",
 co_id                  POSITION(14:21) CHAR,
 dept_id                POSITION(22:24) CHAR,
 btch_no                POSITION(25:36) CHAR,
 trans_id               POSITION(37:42) CHAR)

-- Record Type SM : File Summary
INTO TABLE test_table
WHEN rec_id_no = 'SM' and :ack_type = '1'
TRAILING NULLCOLS
(rec_no                 RECNUM,
 hdr_line               CONSTANT 'L',
 rec_id_no              POSITION(1:2)   CHAR,
 file_number            POSITION(3:5)   CHAR,
 sequence_number        POSITION(6:10)  CHAR,
 ccy_code               POSITION(11:13) CHAR,
 amount                 POSITION(14:26) CHAR,
 number_trans_ok        POSITION(27:40) CHAR)

The code above does not work, it is said that: ack_type is not recognized. Is there a way to do it, given the former character of the SQL Load version?

What is the database version 11i is running on? If 11 GR 2, this doc can help you in the use of the features that Dan mentions

How to use the 9i or 10g features in SQL * Loader for Apps? [423035.1 ID]

HTH
Srini

error in pl/sql of the CASE clause.
Hello
I m not a sql progremmer. an interior according to the database worked for previous but not mentioned dates and may be for dates too.
Error is given after the following code.

We have 4 store-ID, that ID is to have values rest three IDs have values 0. Gets the ID having missed in FUND and error values. The cursor query works fine when executed alone.

kindly advice!

declare
ip_date varchar2 (30): =' 27-AUG-2011.
cursor dwn_cnt (param_date varchar2, param_hr number), select store b.aw_store_id, count (*) bv1to1.aw_user_dwnld_cnt count_dwn, b bv1to1.bv_user_profile where a.date_download between to_date(param_date||) e '|| param_hr |': 0 0:00 ', "HH24:MI:SS of MON-DD-YYYY") and to_date(param_date||) e '|| param_hr | (": 59: 59 ',' MON-DD-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') and a.user_id = b.user_id group by b.aw_store_id;
dwn_cnt_var dwn_cnt % rowtype;
type dwn_cnt_hr is table of number of pls_integer indexes;
dwn_cnt_hr_var dwn_cnt_hr;
Start
dbms_output.put_line ('US' |) ',' ||' DE'||','||' UK'||','||' FR'||','||' TIME ');
dbms_output.put_line(' ');
I'm in 0.23
loop
dwn_cnt_hr_var (0): = 0;
dwn_cnt_hr_var (103): = 0;
dwn_cnt_hr_var (104): = 0;
dwn_cnt_hr_var (105): = 0;
dwn_cnt_hr_var (200): = 0;
Open dwn_cnt (ip_date, i);
extract the dwn_cnt in dwn_cnt_var;
loop
box (dwn_cnt_var. Store)
When 0 then
dwn_cnt_hr_var (0): = dwn_cnt_var.count_dwn;
When there are 103 then
dwn_cnt_hr_var (103): = dwn_cnt_var.count_dwn;
When there are 104 then
dwn_cnt_hr_var (104): = dwn_cnt_var.count_dwn;
When 105 then
dwn_cnt_hr_var (105): = dwn_cnt_var.count_dwn;
When 200 then
dwn_cnt_hr_var (200): = dwn_cnt_var.count_dwn;
end case;
extract the dwn_cnt in dwn_cnt_var;
When the output dwn_cnt % notfound;
end loop;
dbms_output.put_line (dwn_cnt_hr_var (0) + dwn_cnt_hr_var (200) |) «, » || dwn_cnt_hr_var (103) | «, » || dwn_cnt_hr_var (105) | «, » || dwn_cnt_hr_var (104) | «, » || (i);
close dwn_cnt;
end loop;
end;
/

OUTPUT:-

US, UK, FR, HOUR
declare
*
ERROR on line 1:
ORA-06592: not found CASE when executing CASE statement
ORA-06512: at line 20
Elapsed time: 00:00:00.90

Rgds,
Abdallah.
You need an ELSE clause:
```
...
when 200 then
   dwn_cnt_hr_var(200):=dwn_cnt_var.count_dwn;
else
   /* code here for what to do if none of the WHEN clauses are true */
end case;
...
```

JDeveloper does not support the SQL expert, cannot add query clause to view link
For developers who can know:

I use JDeveloper 10.1.3.4 and I have two tables, we're STUDENTS, the other is the PRICE, with a one-to-many relationship (a student may have several awards), and ID is the foreign key:
```
STUDENTS
------------------------
ID    NAME    DOB
------------------------
9999  JOHN    01/02/1990
   |  
   |  
   |  
   |           AWARDS
   |           ------------------------
   |           ID      DESC      AMOUNT
   |           ------------------------
   ----------- 9999    PELL      500
               9999    PERKINS   800
               9999    LOAN      900
```
In the application, when a student (9999, JOHN) connects, the information above is displayed. I need to add up all the awards for the student and to display not only the elements of price, but also the total amount of all awards. To do this, I created another object to view named TotalAwards in the object entity the price just to get the total amount. The SQL code of the VO's
```
SELECT SUM(Awards.AMOUNT) AS TOTAL
FROM AWARDS Awards
```
Then, a link is created between the students and the TotalAwards, and use of the new link to the view is added to the application module. TotalAwards is now available in the data control palette to be drag-and - drop to pages.

Problem occurs when the application is invoked. An error is caught before the application can begin. The error message indicates that "the ends or the link view do not specify an attribute.

It seems that the TOTAL 'SUM (Awards.AMOUNT) AS TOTAL' is not recognized as an attribute. I have reviewed the query clause in the display link to see if it is there, such as:
```
         Attribute        Bind Variable
         ------------     --------------
         Students.ID      :Bind_Id


WHEHE    :Bind_Id = Awards.ID
```
There is no such clause in the query clause page. And I can not add a no more, because the page is grayed out and disabled. I think maybe it's for the same reason: TOTAL is not recognized as an attribute of the price.

How to get around the problem? Or are there other ways to summarize the total amount and view it in the browser?

Thank you very much for help!

Newman
Hello

Here you have a solution for the TOTAL:
http://www.freewebalbum.com/blogs/faces/bjanko/blogs.jsp?blog=bjanko20070725180020

Kind regards

Branislav

Pass Pl/sql table in the USING clause in the EXECUTE IMMEDIATE statement
Getting error when I try to pass the PL/SQL table in the USING clause in the EXECUTE IMMEDIATE statement:

Declare
result NUMBER;
TYPE values_tab IS TABLE OF NUMBER INDEX OF directory;
lv_tab values_tab;
lv_exp varchar2 (300);
lv_exec varchar2 (300);
BEGIN
lv_tab (1): = 5;
lv_tab (2): = 48;
lv_tab (3): = 7;
lv_tab (4): = 6;
lv_exp: = ': + b1: b2 + (: b3 *: b4)';
lv_exec: = 'SELECT'. lv_exp | ' THE DOUBLE '.

IMMEDIATE EXECUTION
lv_exec
IN
result
USING
lv_tab;
DBMS_OUTPUT. Put_line (result);

END;
/

Error on line 1
ORA-06550: line 20, column 12:
PLS-00457: expressions must be SQL types
ORA-06550: line 15, column 8:
PL/SQL: Statement ignored

I am trying to evaluate the expression ': + b1: b2 + (: b3 *: b4) "which is stored in the table. This table has different expressions (expressions about 300). I want to use the bind variable in the expression because each expression evaluated thousands of time may be more in some cases. If I use bind variable can he fill pool.

Is there a way I can pass parameters with the HELP of (IN) dynamically instead of write "help lv_tab (1), lv_tab (2), lv_tab (3), lv_tab (4)? As number of change of the input parameters depend on the expression in the table.

If it is possible please suggest any other ideas/approaches

Help, please...

Published by: satnam on June 11, 2009 11:50
Well, you keep changing faster reqs that I can follow. In any case, assuming that N-th variable bind (left to right) corresponds to n-th collection item:
```
Declare
    result NUMBER;
    lv_tab values_tab := values_tab();
    lv_exp varchar2(300);
    lv_exec varchar2(300);
    lv_i number := 0;
BEGIN
    lv_tab.extend(4);
    lv_tab(1) := 5;
    lv_tab(2) := 48;
    lv_tab(3) := 7;
    lv_tab(4) := 6;
    lv_exp := ':5000135+:5403456+(:5900111*:5200456)';
    lv_exec := lv_exp;
    While regexp_like(lv_exec,':\d+') loop
      lv_i := lv_i + 1;
      lv_exec := REGEXP_REPLACE(lv_exec,':\d+',':b(' || lv_i || ')',1,1);
    end loop;
    lv_exec := 'BEGIN :a := ' || lv_exec || '; END;';
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(lv_exec);
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE lv_exec USING OUT result,IN lv_tab;
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(result);
END;
/
BEGIN :a := :b(1)+:b(2)+(:b(3)*:b(4)); END;
95

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

SQL> 
```
SY.

Join the table orders from clause
Hi all

Who is the effective way to join the tables in from clause. I have two tables first with 20 lakh records and second containing 10 lakh recods.
```
 
QUERY 1:  SELECT T4.ID,T4.ISO_NAME  FROM T,T4 
WHERE T4.ISO_NAME LIKE '%US%' AND T.ID=T4.ID;

QUERY 2:  SELECT T4.ID,T4.ISO_NAME  FROM T4,T 
WHERE T4.ID=T.ID AND  T4.ISO_NAME LIKE '%US%';

T(ID IS PRIMARY KEY) 
(20 lakh records)

T4 (ID IS PRIMARY KEY ) 
(10 lakh records)
---------------------
ID     ISO_NAME
100  US,UK,IN,BR
101  UK,US,BR,IN
102  BR,UK,US,IN


Note: No index on ISO_NAME .
```
Who is the effective query 1 or 2. Please suggest me if you have an idea to rewrite the query.

Kind regards
Rajasekhar

Published by: SuNRiZz68 on January 29, 2009 04:22
In practical terms, Alex is right. Sometimes it matter what table is selected first, but does the CBO generally a very good job of deciding what you need to select the first (assuming that your statistics are up to date) but this is the situation you are trying to avoid as much as possible.

If you specify a table main command tables in the clause is not reliable and should be used - but think before using advice and don't do that when necessary.

Which table to select depends firstly on the join method in the execution plan. Nested loops joins perform better by selecting in the smaller table first, make a loop on the largest table. Joins the smaller set hash table in memory first, and then go through the larger table, perform searches in memory. He can't make any difference, what table is read using first the merger joins and sort.

Back to your original question. Using the cost-based optimizer, both queries will probably roll the same because newer versions of Oracle (9i, 10g) often transform queries for efficiency before the execution anyway. According to what do you or do not request should probably run a nested loop or hash join. With a small set of data creaing index and using a search of nested loops will probably be faster to avoid full table scans. the '%' in the LIKE clause leader would ignore an index on the ISO_NAME column in any case if a main column may be used in a composite index. All this is based on the approximation using the information provided; Tuning questions should always be tested to unexpected developments.

Problems of execution of a SQL function with a variable in the WHERE clause

Hello world!
I have programmed a function that returns a boolean value based on the result of the SQL. It's the function:
FUNCTION existe_secuencial (seq_name VARCHAR2) RETURN AS BOOLEAN
cursor c2 is SELECT FROM all_sequences WHERE upper (sequence_name) = sequence_name' | seq_name | ' ;
BEGIN
OPEN c2;
DBMS_OUTPUT. Put_line (nombre_seq);
Get c2 INTO kk;
If c2% NOTFOUND = True THEN
RETURNS false;
on the other
RETURNS true;
end if;
END existe_secuencial;
And I give the floor to the function of a procedure in this way:
IF existe_secuencial ("SEQ_ARQUETA") = True THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT. Put_line ('exists');
ON THE OTHER
DBMS_OUTPUT. Put_line ("' NOT exists");
END IF;
The probrem that this SQL is forced to return results because this sequence exists in the comic book, but is not, return me the FALSE value. What makes me mad is that if I change the second line of the function in this way:
> > cursor c2 is SELECT FROM all_sequences WHERE upper (sequence_name) sequence_name ="SEQ_ARQUETA";
It works find and return of sequence existing (real)
Can someone help me please, I'm quite desperate to find what is the problem with that because I do not understand why if I built the slider with a variable returns no results so that if I do write it works...
Thanks in advance!
Itziar

Frame you your variable in quotes, which makes the string literal ' |. ' seq_name | "rather than the content of the variable.

I think that something like this would be an improvement.

function existe_secuencial (seq_name VARCHAR2) return a Boolean value as

number of exist_check: = 0;

Start

Start

Select 1

in exist_check

of all_sequences

where upper (sequence_name) = upper (seq_name);

exception

When no_data_found then

null;

end;

return (exist_check = 1);

end existe_secuencial;

Join the two sql queries

Hi all

Thank you very much for all the kind support so far.

I have two report (sql query)

I want to add both the sql query

1st sql query

select distinct(a.item_number)
      ,a.quantity - b.quantity
from QUANTITY_ONHAND_ATP a,BACKLOG_ATP_LT_CW b
where a.item_number = b.item_number
order by item_number

2nd sql query

select distinct(wb.item_number)
       ,wb.quantity - be.quantity
       ,c.quantity - d.quantity
from BACKLOG_WEEK_BEFORE_ATP wb
    ,BACKLOG_ATP_ET_CW be
    ,BACKLOG_WEEK_AFTER_ATP c
    ,BACKLOG_ATP_GT_CW d
where wb.item_number = be.item_number
   and c.item_number = d.item_number
   and wb.item_number = c.item_number
   and be.item_number = c.item_number
   and wb.item_number = d.item_number
   and be.item_number = d.item_number
order by wb.ITEM_NUMBER

In the 1st sql query I have 129 records and in the 2nd query sql, I have 14 records. I want to combine these two sql queries. If the item_number 1st sql query is not there in 2nd and then view it as to 1 sql only.

Any help how to do that.

Concerning

Published by: User_Apex on July 15, 2011 01:21

Use the NVL function:

select q1.item_number, WEEK_BEFORE, nvl(CURRENT_WEEK,0) CURRENT_WEEK, nvl(WEEK_AFTER,0) WEEK_AFTER
(...)

Session variable in the WHERE clause of the SQL statement

Hey all,.
I was wonering just if there is a way to set the WHERE clause of the query that the session variable? I have the following so far and have tried to go through a ton of tutorials, but it doesn't seem to work. Is it still possible? I don't know what follows is wrong, but can someone help me with changing the following code, or pointing me to a good tutorial? (I write it with PHP)
$query = "SELECT * from members where user_id = ' $_SESSION ['members']";
Thanks for your help.

$member = "-1";
If (isset($_SESSION['members'])) {}
$member = $_SESSION ['members'];

}
$query = "SELECT * from members where user_id = $member;

JOIN the SQL clause

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for