Limit the number of subscribers on the same JMS subscribe to Message subject

Hello

Is it possible or property on Weblogic Console on JMS topic put force that a specific number of Subscriber can subscribe only to this topic

BPEL (JDeveloper) or at design time items in .jca file?

Thank you

Hi momo,.

Can you give some details on the usage scenario/case you're trying to accomplish?

There is no option to set a constraint on the number of subscribers. You wouldn't be limited, as is one of the reasons you would use a topic to build a scalable solution, i.e. to have flexibility to introduce additional subscribers without impacting existing publishers or consumers.

If the intention is to restrict access to the topic, the best way would be to use a SSL based connection. This will allow you to share the credentials to consumers only planned.

I hope this helps!

Thank you

Patrick

Tags: Fusion Middleware

Similar Questions

  • Is it possible to set up my computer with Windows XP to limit the time kids spend on this subject?

    My kids use the computer too much and I want to limit the time spent on the computer to 2 hours per day. Is there a way to do this in Windows XP? I know you can do this with Windows 2000.

    Hi Suzana,

    Found some information at http://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/501603-restrict-logon-time-in-group-policy/

    I hope this helps.

  • HP Deskjet 3050 a J611 series. I have used this printer before with the same laptop. Error message #5

    I have a HP Deskjet 3050 a J611 all-in-one. I have used this printer with the same laptop that were purchased together.

    He was works fine, but now when I try the CD to install, an error message comes up with cannot load drivers or cannot find the port to monitor? I tried everything to implement without change.

    Have you tried to download the drivers from the Web site. Here is a link that will help you with it. http://goo.GL/BVOOg

  • How can I limit the information displayed with a message?

    When I hilight a screen message includes twenty or more lines of technical information that I don't want and didn't used to be there. How can I get the display to normal email format?

    View (Alt - V) - headers - Normal

  • Why, when I try to upgrade to 8.0.1, I still end up with the same version and a message that says "you are not on the latest version of Firefox. Update today to get the best of the Web! » ?

    Yesterday, I tried to switch to 8.0.1 twice. Both times the upgrade process seemed to work. I downloaded the files, clicked on install, he says it's "housekeeping" (removal of the old version?), but in the end, I'm still under the old version even.

    I've updated home on my laptop, no problem.

    See:

    See also:

  • Separate installs Palm desktop for Palm M505 and its applications, Palm Treo 680 and its applications on the same computer in Windows XP?

    Hello:

    I'm doing a work around. I have a Palm M505 with a fantastic keyboard that connects to it. This allows me to write documents in a very portable way. The Treo 680 has never been the equivalent external keyboard, really full compatible with it rendering. So, I want to create documents on the M505 but otherwise use especially the Treo 680.

    That's the problem. When I tried to synchronize two devices for my Palm Desktop version 4.1.2 for Windows XP, it did not work. HotSync to synchronize applications that do not work on the M505. In addition, versions of Documents to Go are very different (5.x versus 8.x).

    I have a separate installation of Palm Desktop for each device, so I can have a nice desktop environment for each launching them separately. But the Palm Desktop installation "Wizard" stops and does not give me the opportunity to do a separate install of funds.

    Any ideas other than the purchase of an ultra compact laptop and drop this scheme kludgy? For example, if I had to copy the installed files in files from one directory to another, this work or would would he not put in place in the registry?

    Thank you!

    Very well. Stubbornness is paying off! I could beam documents between my Palm M505 and Treo 680, avoiding the need of complicated synchronization of the two Palms for my laptop. I was also able to transmit documents of both palms to my laptop Dell Inspiron M300, running Windows XP Pro.

    When transferring between Palm devices, the results were better. In the M505, Documents to Go version 5,004 does not translate documents in Microsoft Word format, but in something he calls Word to Go. The Treo has DTG version 8.003, which is able to read files in Word format Go and save Microsoft Word for Windows format natively.

    However, even when transferring a word in the document (old format) Go directly on my Windows XP computer desktop, he gave me a document that I could open, with the text that I would be entered following a bunch of Word characters obviously did not understand. If I add the file from my office to the most recent Documents to Go version on my laptop, I would expect that it it mean in a Word file when it sync for the Treo, but who were not on trial. In both cases, beaming between devices Palm is the simplest solution and has completely solved the problem.

    For readers who are interested, that I so stubbornly tried to solve this problem because I am a typist quick touch. My old Palm M505 plugs directly into a Portable Palm both wonderful, old keyboard which is full size. Because it is a wired connection, I can type fast. This old keyboard compresses in the same footprint folded as some new keyboards external foldover. Even though much more bigger by folding it together in an accordion - like fashion, with record four flat surfaces. The design of this keyboard is now in some keyboards sold by the IGo Corporation (their former name for it was Sierra Stowaway Bluetooth keyboard). But they were unable to find a way to handshake their Bluetooth with the strange configuration Bluetooth in the Treo 680. Why from the library different Bluetooth in the Treo 680 Palm other Treo is a mystery to me, but enough of this tangent. Some interested by this workaround can be curious for the same reasons.

    Message is about: Treo 680 (Cingular)

  • Maximum limit for the number of periods loops that can be run at the same time?

    I am developing a simulator that requires many pieces of code to execute in parallel.  As a result, we were in loops just for this purpose.  I didn't count but there are close to 100 call loops that eventually run at a given time.

    A week ago, I've reached a point where the Simulator was working fine but when I added a more timed loop, it would break LabVIEW.  When I say LabVIEW crashed, I want to say there is no warnings that popped up, and LabVIEW just stopped completely.  Worse still, LabVIEW didn't offer even to recover the work when I start it back up again.  However, removing an additional timed loop allows everyone to work normally again.

    I'm under LabVIEW 2009 Version 9.0f3 (32 bit).  I have observed this behavior even on two different systems, one that is 3.2 GHz Xeon Quad-core with 2.0 GB of RAM, running Windows XP SP3 (32 bit) and the other is a 3.0 GHz AMD Athlon 64 Dual Core with 4.0 GB of RAM, running Windows 7 Professional (64 bit).

    Because the two systems are quite different, and LabVIEW appears to hang at the same point, I wonder if someone has already noticed such behavior.  I searched online and can't seem to find any reference to such a limit on call loops.

    One last thing.  I made an attempt to replace all the loops timed with while loops, but this seems to lead to some kind of hunger because the Simulator becomes suddenly jerky, without seeming to consume all resources more than when the call loops were in place.  So, which doesn't seem to be an option.

    I think that you are limited to 128 Timed loops in a system. Could not find anything by specifying that online, I am sure that I heard him. Also, the Sources Software-Triggered clock Timing loops can only be counted between 0-127.

    However, it certainly sounds like a bug that LabVIEW would crash during the approach of this limit rather than up a significant error.

    You can do some things to help avoid the unstable behaviour of the normal use of many parallels while loops. Place one or more loops in subVIs and then distribute these subVIs enforcement systems . This will give you your application with multiple threads of execution, which will reduce the ground being. If you don't do this, your curls probably all run System Standard of performance, which, by default, cannot have 8 wires at his disposal to share between all the loops.

  • How can I limit the number of attempts to print a web page

    I am trying to find a solution to a problem on our network.
    We run several kiosk machines that allow customers to print documents and web pages. However, we find that we are wasting a lot of ink because of the user frequently sending the same print job on the printer.
    Yesterday we had someone print more than 70 pages, because they just keep clicking on print.
    I tried looking for an add-on that would solve this but was not able to find one.
    My question is this, is there an internal setting that can be changed in firefox to limit the number of prints is trying to say once every 30 seconds, or even a way to make a dialog box turns on screen saying that the print request is currently dealing and does nor print before completing the task at hand.

    Sorry, there no setting in Firefox to avoid that from happening. Once the user sees the "native print dialog" box (which is seen when you Ctrl + P for print), the operating system and the printer drivers are here.

    I saw something similar to that on kiosk / PC rental stores Office of FedEx, which inform the user of the cost per page, the user wants to send to a printer, and when the user click again to the same pages again, he asked if you want to spend another $x.xx to print a second copy. Would not too different to simply cut the printing of multiple copies of the same document and warn the user of this action.

    My advice is to discuss it with anyone who put in place these kiosks to be with.

  • How to limit the number of download

    When I download many files (files of 30 to 50 at a time), firefox gets as many downloads at the same time as possible (6-7 siml dwlds). I want to limit the number of simultaneous download of 2-3. could not find the option for that. I need beak FFox occupies all the connections and I can't use any other internet stuff on this day.

    You can install an add-on to do this work for you.
    Search for download heremanagers.

    E.g. DownThemAll

  • Is it possible to limit the number of connections to the remote panel to a vi?

    Hello

    I have an application that runs on a PXI RT system and I use the remote control to access. My license allows me to have several remote connections and it's ok that I sometimes need to open several remote panels at the same time.  However, I would like to limit the number of connections for a particular VI 1.  Is this something that can be done?

    Kind regards

    Patrick Lessnick

    The way it can be done is to interview customers who are connected to the VI through a remote façade.  When you do that, you close the connection to anyone, but the first person who connected to the façade.  In this way, if someone is running the VI, no one else can connect.  Once they are made, someone else can then connect to the remote façade.  I created an example illistrates community this behavior.  You can find it here:

    http://decibel.NI.com/content/docs/doc-9673

    If you have any other questions, let me know.

    Scott

  • How can I limit the number of connections to my PC for an incoming connection at a time. Multiple users are connected to my computer via the network.

    original title: limit incoming connections

    I want to restrict the number of connections to my pc for an incoming connection at a time.  I have several users that connect to my computer, using the same user name & password.  If someone tries to open a session, they fall out of someone who is already connected, without notice. the only solution I can think of is to limit the number of incoming connections to one.

    Hi willard.

    Your question is more complex that most seem to be on the answers. I suggest that you re-post on our TechNetforums where computer professionals can help you.

    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/categories/

    I hope this helps.

  • Windows 7 and vista limit the number of files to select and print or open to 15. Need a work around to push this limit.

    Windows 7 (and Vista) when you select more than 15 files in Explorer, the 'Print' and 'Open' selections under the 'File' menu disappear.  This is very annoying, because I work with a lot of text files and selecting them 15 at once is heavy and prone to errors.  I need a work around to raise this limit to about 60.  I never had no problem to do under XP or previous editions of windows.  I have a fast computer or memory but windows 7 won't let me use it: it of like buying a ferrari and the merchant sends a padlock on the accelerator and said "...". you will son... This is for your own safety! "It's very frustrating.

    Maybe, it's a limitation of the program that you use to open the files. I use Windows Live Photo Gallery, and even if I select more than 500 files at the same time, the open and print commands can be used.

    By the way: the number of places of a Ferrari is very limited. ;-)

  • PIX515 limit the number of Tunnels?

    Hi all

    Is there a limit to the number of VPN tunnels that you can create on a Pix515?

    Thanks for any help

    MG

    There are limiting the number of VPN peers, which is actually the same thing. Check your license features by publishing the underside as the cli: -.

    Show worm - you should see something like: -.

    The devices allowed for this platform:

    The maximum physical Interfaces: 3

    VLAN maximum: 10

    Internal hosts: unlimited

    Failover: disabled

    VPN - A: enabled

    VPN-3DES-AES: enabled

    Cut - through Proxy: enabled

    Guardians: enabled

    URL filtering: enabled

    Security contexts: 0

    GTP/GPRS: disabled

    VPN peers: unlimited

    VPN peers, that's what you're looking for - numbered or unlimited! There is a limitation of thru - put encryption cannot have 1 million tunnels and expect to get MBs of through - put!

    HTH.

  • I was wondering if there was a limit to the AMOUNT of files (not size) that I could transfer at the same time?

    Hey there, I was wondering if there was a limit to the AMOUNT of files (not size) that I could transfer at the same time? usually I go abou 40K files of external references on a regular basis, I would like to know if there is a limit to this (80K maybe?, or one does not exist?)

    Thank you

    Original title: Maximum file transfer

    Hi Chad,

    Thanks for posting the question in the Microsoft Community forums.

    Looks like you need more information on the transfer of the files of more than 80 k to external devices.

    1. have you tried to send files over 40 k?

    2. What is the brand and model of the computer?

    There is no practical limitation on the number of files that can be transferred from one computer to external devices. Although there is no file transfer limit depends on several factors, first externally you use, the memory of the computer file system if it can retain enormous transfer rates.

    Hope this information helps. Get back to us if you have more queries about Windows.

  • Limit the number of results when searching for users?

    Hi all.

    The following rule works very well:
      <invoke name='toList'>
        <invoke name='listObjects'>
          <ref>context</ref>
          <s>User</s>
          <map>
            <s>conditions</s>
            <list>
              <new class='com.waveset.object.AttributeCondition'>
                <s>DEFERREDTASKDATE</s>
                <s>notPresent</s>
                <s></s>
              </new>
            </list>
          </map>
        </invoke>
        <s>name</s>
      </invoke>
    But in the production environment, we want to limit the number of results to a manageable level, say 200 users. I tried resultLimit and LignesMax in the stock option plan, but nothing helped.
    Pointers to help me in the right direction?

    Best regards
    Stefan

    The JavaDoc for AttributeCondition does not list these operators or conditions.

    You will need to add conditions to your query that limits the response by other means.

    I don't know what your user name looks like, but for us, we have an ID for each account that you could put limits to

    i.e.

    UserID > current_place and userid< current_place="" +="">

    that, if the user name is a number, would limit the answer to a maximum of limit, but if no user is in the meantime it would obviously be zero.

    the alternative is to create your own rule to query the repository on your own and use the resulting data to browse normal calls.
    It's a bit heavy if you use attributes that are not available at hand, only existing in the xml BLOB

    I also think that you could make your own javaclass and do the same thing, but I'm just not proficent in java as to who try here: P

Maybe you are looking for