Limits of the custom object

Hello guys,.

I'm trying to document all the limits of the custom object and new features added in new versions of cod.

If anyone has any documentation or want to share some points, it will be greatly appreciated.

Thank you

IMSA

Currently, Expression Builder is not available on items custom 4-16 but this evolving R17
Attachments do not appear on some custom objects I forgot who once.

Tags: Oracle

Similar Questions

  • REST API - the internal names of the fields in the custom object

    Hello

    We have an old system that uses the SOAP API and I'm rewritten with the REST API. Before, with SOAP, you identify the fields object personalized with their internal names. Therefore, our system and stored that names in its database. Now, I'm facing a problem. as the REST API does not provide the internal names for the fields in the custom object, as their full names and IDs. Am I wrong? Is it possible to get the internal names through REST? I found, you can get this internal names through the API as a WHOLE, but is there really no way to get them using REST? It seems strange to me and I don't want to use in BULK as there limits for requests per day.

    Hi Marc,

    In bulk API endpoints are the best way to retrieve the details field you are looking for.  Calls to retrieve this detail do not count against the daily API limits for the bulk API.

  • Get the custom object Id 5 in URL

    Hello

    How can I get an Id value of 5 custom in a URL object?

    I get 5 name of the custom object using the % name CustomObject5%, but does not work with the % CustomObject5 Id %.

    My code is:

    & ServiceRequestEditForm.CustomObject5 name = % CustomObject5 name %.
    & ServiceRequestEditForm.CustomObject5 Id = % CustomObject5 Id %.

    Customize objects 1 and 2 works fine with:

    & ServiceRequestEditForm.Custom 1 = object name % 1 object name custom percent.
    & ServiceRequestEditForm.Custom object Id = 1% Custom object Id 1%.
    & ServiceRequestEditForm.Custom 2 = object name % name object custom 2%.
    & ServiceRequestEditForm.Custom object Id = 2% object Id custom 2%.

    Thank you.

    Published by: user13796387 on 03/15/2011 06:59

    Published by: user13796387 on 03/15/2011 07:38

    Published by: user13796387 on 03/15/2011 07:39

    Yes. Name, Id and Id integration external fields are available in the lay of the land. ID is not available.

    .

  • How can I update the custom object data card?

    Hello world

    We maintain a field check box on one of our custom objects data sheets.  I took a quick glance at the Eloqua REST API of Fred Sakr and found c# library class "customobjectdata", but there are only methods to get data cards and create new maps.  Someone at - it an example of updating an existing data card?

    I also took a glance to the bulk API but this would bring additional complexity to our development effort.  It seems that there must be a way to do this with a single call.

    I am open to the use of the SOAP API if this action is not possible using REST.

    Thank you

    Hey Austin Christmas Yes, you can update CDO via the REST API. We found this material useful for the performance of the access/mutation operations for CDOS: REST API - the custom metadata object

  • Cannot return the custom object method in the module of the application

    Hi all

    I use Jdeveloper 11 g R2 (11.1.2.3) & Weblogic 10.3.5.0

    I need to add a method with a custom object as return in my application module sometingh like this:

    public MyObject-myMethod (line myRow) {}
    my code...
    }

    After add request module is not displayed in the Client interface, so I'm not able to expose to view projects

    But if I change it to:

    public Long myMethod (line myRow) {}
    my code...
    }

    so it's OK

    Can someone tell me I expect much? or a bad thing?
    Is that more than a service of class of the interface?

    Thank you
    Mohsen

    Your custom class must be serialized, otherwise it will not be displayed as a client method.

    Timo

  • Stuff of clip designed by graphics to the limits of the UIComponent object

    Hello

    I wonder if there is a built-in feature in flex cut everything that is drawn by
    the purpose of a UIComponent to stay within his limits chart (this is the width and height).

    For example, draw a line from x = 0 to x = 150 in a UIComponent has a width of 100 clips the
    line automatically to x = 100.

    I just noticed this yesterday in the RFSO for the Loader class. Could be useful. You use a mask to prevent drawing out of control.
    ----------------------------------------
    When you load a SWF from an untrusted source (for example, one domain other than the root file loader SWF), you can define a mask for the Loader object, to prevent the loaded content (which is a child of the Loader object) drawing to portions of the scene outside this mask, as shown in the following code :

    import flash.display. *;
    import flash.net.URLRequest;
    var rect:Shape = new Shape();
    rect.graphics.beginFill (0xFFFFFF);
    rect.graphics.drawRect (0, 0, 100, 100);
    rect.graphics.endFill ();
    addChild (rect);
    var ldr:Loader = new Loader();
    LDR. Mask = rect;
    var url: String = "" http://www.unknown.example.com/content.swf "; "
    var urlReq:URLRequest = new URLRequest (url);
    LDR. Load (urlReq);
    addChild (ldr);

  • The custom object properties

    I want to add a property to my < mx:TextInput on my project given, this property being "errortext.

    This

    < mx:TextInput errorText = "You must fill in this field" / > etc.

    How can I go about it?

    I tell myself I have to extend mx.controls.textInput... how can I do this?

    Like this

    package {}
    Import mx.controls.TextInput;

    SerializableAttribute public class ExtTextInput extends {TextInput
    private var _errorText:String;

    [Bindable]
    public function set {errorText(value:String):void}
    This ._errorText = value;
    }

    public function get errorText (): String {}
    return this ._errorText;
    }
    }
    }

  • Custom object of the quantities Record Field (best practices)

    Hello

    I've been searching but can't seem to find the best practices or recommendations on how many fields to the max may or must be in a single record from custom object. Is there someone out there who could give some information on this? or perhaps point me to some documents or articles on the subject?

    Thank you!

    You can take the class effective Marketing with the custom object class to better understand.  An excerpt from the guide of the student with the limitations thereon:

  • Related custom object records the Segment export view

    Hello

    I have records history of purchases in Eloqua-specific custom objects.

    These records are related to contacts.

    When I create a segment, I have the ability to filter the contacts based on the data stored on these custom objects.

    I want to export all the records in the custom objects related to all the contacts in the segment view, I can do?

    Hi Ofir,

    There is no way to do it directly from Eloqua. Segments will allow you only to view Contact data, and there is no equivalent way to custom segment object stores the data. To generate this list, you will need to export all history of purchase of your custom object records and then cross the two lists to identify records of custom object related to the Contacts in your industry to export all the contacts from your Segment view.

  • Evaluation period for the stage of field custom object compare?

    I've never used an evaluation period during a stage of field of the custom object to compare on the canvas of the campaign and I want to confirm that she will be as I wait for him.

    We have a campaign that will send an email in nine batches, each a week after previous. I have a custom object with a field that contains the batch number (1-9) and I put nine steps to compare items customized on the canvas. The first checks to see if batch = 1, the second batch = 2, etc. I added a trial period of 7 days for the first eight steps. After I activated the campaign, I would expect all flow into the first stage of the decision and all those whose lot = 1 will immediately proceed to the stage of e-mail and the rest will wait seven days before moving on to the second decision, where everyone with batch = 2 will be moved to the stage left and e-mail everyone will wait for more than seven days, etc.

    I want to just make sure that this will be similar to, say, the Email step click on decision given that the data in the custom object will not change during the evaluation period, as it can to the other stages of decisions. And I don't want to accidentally send all nine lots at a time.

    Thank you.

    Hi Rob,

    This could work, as the Yes path would fire instantly and without the path would check during the evaluation period. Is there a reason to not only use a delay of a week between each stage of the decision well? A little more crowded, but perhaps more clearly during the audit of the canvas to the wire without having to enter each stage?

    See you soon,.

    Phil

  • The default value based on the field from another table to a custom object

    I'm trying to set the default value to a field in the custom object to the value of a field of account. I tried the syntax 50 ways different and just don't get the case. The label for the account field displays the form of s/n, the integration of the tag is ltDBA_ACCT and it appears in the fx reports area as Account.Text_22.

    The field of custom object that I am triying update is also called s/n, which was originally the required field 'NAME '. The name of the table, account, should it be included? Do I need a function to the field?

    I've updated the external ID using the line with syntex < ID > ID (at least higher ID) so I know that it is possible to define a default value, but s / < n >, < ltDBA_ACCT >, 'account '. "" S/n "and so on are simply not working.

    If anyone knows how to get into what I would be really grateful for the help.

    OK, so if you default a field to the value of another object, you must use the JoinFieldValue function. I think you understand that, based on your original post, but I want to be sure you do.

    Then this won't work by default if the folder is created from the object that you want to join the because a default works in record creation and the ID must be available so that it works correctly. It will not work if you choose the record of the related object after that registration of the custom object is created. You can set the default after, but that does not meet your requirements.

    The syntax of the default are the following: JoinFieldValue (ref_record_type, foreign_key, field_name).

    In your case, ref_record_type is '', foreign_key is [] and field_name is ''. The best way is to determine what is the name of the field to create a new workflow for the account and use the Workflow Rule Condition expression builder to choose your field ("DBA") in the list. The value returned by the expression builder must be placed in the field_name variable in the function JoinFieldValue (minus the parentheses and quotes).

    Give it a shot and let me know how you do.
    Thom

  • Cannot add functions to new areas created in 5 custom object

    Hello

    I come from the custom object 5 activated by the customer service.
    Trying to create a new field in it, but do not get the button to add functions to the field.

    Wanted to know if it is a characteristic of the 5 custom object or is it a mistake to their end.

    Any thoughts?

    Hi, object custom 4 & above does not support management capabilities of the advanced field as the field validation, broken etc. In addition to this there are other limitations such as workflow support, books etc.

    -John CRMIT

  • Open the custom container qml page... doesn't work do not

    I have the custom object container which is given below

    import bb.cascades 1.3
    
    Container {
        layout: DockLayout {
    
        }
        ImageButton {
            minWidth: 160
            minHeight: 150
            defaultImageSource: "asset:///images/button_container_90x130.png"
            horizontalAlignment: HorizontalAlignment.Center
            verticalAlignment: VerticalAlignment.Center
            onClicked: {console.log("i am clicked")
                var assest = navigateAssist.createObject();
                navigationPane.push(assest);
            }
            attachedObjects: ComponentDefinition {
                id: navigateAssist
                source: "Assist.qml"
            }
          
        }
        ImageButton {
            horizontalAlignment: HorizontalAlignment.Center
            verticalAlignment: VerticalAlignment.Center
            defaultImageSource: "asset:///images/assist.png"
    
        }
    
        Container {
    
            horizontalAlignment: HorizontalAlignment.Center
            verticalAlignment: VerticalAlignment.Center
            topPadding: 100
            bottomPadding: 10
            layout: StackLayout {
    
            }
            Label {
                text: "Assist"
                textStyle {
                    base: SystemDefaults.TextStyles.SmallText
                    color: Color.Black
                }
    
            }
    
        }
    
    }
    

    QML is not opening when struck the Imagebutton control.

    I checked with the console... Console.log () is printing.

    Maybe the container with the label policy thus needs?

  • API bulk: creating custom objects, fields, and lists?

    Hi all

    I have searched and passed through the ticket of support for routing, but have not yet managed to find an answer to this question, so I thought that maybe the people who write the API would be the best ones to talk to

    Anyway, in summary, my question is:-

    Is it possible to create lists of contacts, the Contact fields and items customized by using the bulk API 1.0?

    I know, it is possible to create new contacts and add them to an existing list, but I want to create a new list with the bulk API and then add my contacts on this new list.

    Same kind of thing for the Contact fields. I want to be able to check if there is a Contact field and if not create one and then fill in the import.

    Once again, even for custom objects. I know I can do a GET for all currently available Custom objects, but can I create a new using the API as a whole?

    Any help would be most appreciated.

    Thank you

    Hi Chris,

    You cannot create contact fields, shared lists or the custom objects through the bulk API (which in fact is a RESTful API), they must exist already.

    You can use the REST or lists The SOAP API to create only shared the REST API to create the contact fields, but SOAP or REST currently supports the creation of custom data objects.

    If you don't have it already, please take a look here, building on The Eloqua Platform - A Resource Guide and there REST API - Documentation for kernel objects that will hopefully more questions.

    T.J.

  • Automatic assignment of record parent registration RN when created by OPA and involve a custom object

    The question that we face, it's what seems to be the forced transfer of the child for parent records records when she is using OPA integrated with RightNow to create records. This scenario is a little complex, so I put try it below with a structure to make it easier.

    • Scenario: creating records in RightNow across an interview of the OPA
    • OPA setting of mapping:
      • Personal contact Center (account)
      • At the beginning of the interview, load data related to an individual: Incident
      • At the end of the interview, update Incident
    • Data models:
      • OPA: Global-> [object custom-1] > [custom object 2]
        • all containment relationships
      • RN: Incident-> 1-> object custom object custom 2
        • All relationships of association
    • Detailed description: in Takeovers we are inferring creating two records personal 2 object with a Custom single object 1. In these registers Custom object 2, we put directly the field that contains the link PK 1 custom, object so that each personal object 2 is actually assigned in RN for different Custom object 1s. Some examples of data to explain:
      • Custom 1 object associated with the Incident, read in the OPA
        • ID is set to 123
      • 2 custom object created in OPA under instance of Custom 1 object with ID = 123
        • Link to PK for 1 item 123-custom
      • 2 custom object created in OPA under instance of Custom 1 object with ID = 123
        • PK link for 1 custom object on 345 (different from the Custom object 1 read OPA)
    • Expected behavior: the object two custom 2s are created and assigned to their respective different personal 1 item RightNow records.
    • Actual behavior: the object two custom 2s are created and assigned to the Custom object with ID 123 1

    To continue the investigation, we then tested using a different set of objects, standard objects, but with the same rules:

    • Data models:
      • OPA: Global-> contact-> the incident
        • all containment relationships
      • RN: Organization-> (current) Contact-> Incident (custom object)
        • all relationships of association
      • Detailed description: same logic as the previous
      • Customer expected: same as previous
      • Actual behavior: Matches expected behavior. The Incidents have been correctly assigned to their two different respective Contacts

    This behavior of divestiture now seems specific to custom objects, but can ayone confirms that this is the case and the behavior expected please?

    In addition, we are confident that when you test this feature about 2 weeks ago, we received the expected behavior in BOTH cases to 80%. Maybe it's because changing the configuration in our RN environment that we are not aware of, so we are investingating cela, but are there changes to the OPA / connectors deployment for customer environments in recent weeks that could have caused this please?

    Finally, if this could be affected by a change of configuration of RN, nobody knows what this configuration can be please?

    I can confirm that this is the expected behavior. A few more details are given in the article of doco hierarchies entity Understand - he explains how the containment relationships mapped determines the assignment to the parent.

    The reason for this behavior is that most of the time, it makes sense that the registration of the new entity instances to 'work', feel that they are saved in exactly the same hierarchy of containment that was present in the OPA, and in a way that ensures referential integrity (we support in particular the case where the whole hierarchy of objects is created at the same time if the parent does not yet exist at the time of the creation of the rule (, so you couldn't possibly know its ID). Otherwise, as Matt says, is up to the author of the rule to make sure that, for example, 345 is a valid foreign key.

    This behavior should be the same for the built-in objects as well as custom objects, and as Brad says he has not changed recently. If you see this behavior in some cases but not in others, what this means is that probably in cases where it works as expected, there are multiple relationships between the parent and the child object, and it happens that the foreign key that you set manually is different from the foreign key of the mapped containment relationship.

Maybe you are looking for