Master / detail createInsert jumping required attributes validation with part delivery = true

Similar Questions

• How to create a master/detail with a PK of 4 columns form

  I want to create a report/form (or a master-detail form) based on a table with a primary key of 4 columns. But only up to 2 columns can be présicer at APEX. How can I handle this?
  
  Sincerely,
  
  James

  Hi James,

  I think Mike suggests that you create a SQL view on the table and bring together the different values of the primary key in a primary key, unique, unique, nickname. You can always include the individual columns in the SQL, but you can then use this new column as the primary key on a form. However, you also need to create instead of triggers to manage the changes/insertions/deletions that SQL does not update the tables in a view. (See: [http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/appdev.111/b28370/create_trigger.htm#i2064426] for more details on this Oracle or Re: how to upgrade the table or view for an example within the Apex).

  Ideally, however, you should only really need a column of key - is it necessary for four?

  Andy

• Problem with page validation APEX_APPLICATion master detail.  Help!

  I'm having a problem with the Apex_Application.g_fxx data structure.  I'm trying to validate the lines in my page master detail and need to use apex_application.g_f10 as the name of the variable inside the HTML data source electricity.  The name of the item I need is "f10" because it matches the database column "status" on my page.  I'm trying to validate that all the detail items have the same status, or an error is reported.  I use the following PL/SQL block that returns a Boolean value:

  < code >

  declare
  l_first_value varchar2 (4000);
  Start

  -f10 = column PO_STATUS of PO_DETAILS table on a part as a table on the page.

  l_first_value: = apex_application.g_f10 (1);
  because me in 2... apex_application.g_f10. COUNTY
  loop
  If l_first_value! = apex_application.g_f10 (i)
  then
  Returns false;
  end if;
  end loop;
  Returns true;
  end;

  
  < code >

  The HTML data that I is not intended to "f10" are the following:

  < code >

  < td headers= "Status" class= "t20data" >

  < label for= "f10_0000" class= "hideMeButHearMe" >status< /label>

  < Select name="f10"  id="f10_0000">

  < option value= "" selected= "selected" >make a selection< /option> ""

  < option value= 'APPROVED' >APPROVED< /option>

  < option valeur= « FERMÉ » >FERMÉ< /option>

  </ Select >

  < entry type="hidden" name="f02" value=""  id="f02_0000" />

  < entry type="hidden" name="f03" value="30427" id="f03_0000" />

  < entry type= 'hidden' id= "fcs_0000" name= "fcs" value= "2158A9B101842608F4CA966C0BC1433D" >

  < entry type="hidden" id="frowid_0000" name="frowid" value="" />

  < entry type="hidden" id="fcud_0000" name="fcud" value="D" />

  </ td >

  
  

  < code >
  

  So I do not know why there could be a problem when used to work before this validation.  The PL/SQL block takes the first line of F10 data and compare it to successive lines.  If the data is not equal, then an error occurs and the user is prompted to adjust the data.

  It doesn't work anymore, although I checked and the status are still of points in F10.

  I left mouth gaping.  I do not use an official page master detail previously.  I used two separate front pages: one for the header and one for show master detail.  I've updated the page for the treatment of the more fluid user. I think that even if the data structure would be the same, but maybe I'm wrong.

  Any ideas?

  
  Thank you!

  Thank you to reproduce the problem so overall. Note that if you will share your workspace in this way you need to change your username to something else than a direct email address and don't use not the actual data for your test cases. Create a guest account to developer without administrator privileges to work space for the members of the forum to use.

  Validation in this app is coded to use a different picture of the description in this thread. Above, you have identified the point like g_f10 dashboard, but the validation code is using g_f09:

  declare
    l_first_value  varchar2(4000);
  begin
  -- f09 = PO_STATUS column of PO_DETAILS table
    l_first_value := apex_application.g_f09(1);
    for i in 2 .. apex_application.g_f09.COUNT
    loop
      if l_first_value != apex_application.g_f09(i)
      then
          return false;
      end if;
    end loop;
    return true;
  end;
  

  Therefore (thanks to instrumentation code added), the validation is running by using the values of the previous column, which was be the one that I have changed according to your instructions:

  0.09114	0,00018	... Posting type "Status check IN." -: FUNC_BODY_RETURNING_BOOLEAN	4	0%
  0.09132	0,00049	... Run the statement: select count (*) in the sys.dual where exists (Select 1 from PO_DETAILS where PO_ID =: P230_PO_ID)	4	0 g
  0.09181	0,00015	...... Result = true	4	0%
  0.09196	0.00573

  ... Run the statement: declare function x return boolean is begin declare

  l_first_value varchar2 (4000);

  Start

  -f09 = PO_STATUS table PO_DETAILS column

  l_first_value: = apex_application.g_f09 (1);

  apex_debug.message ('g_f09 (1): %s, l_first_value);

  because me in 2... apex_application.g_f09. COUNTY

  loop

  (apex_debug.message('g_f09(%s): %s, i, apex_application.g_f09 (i));

  If l_first_value! = apex_application.g_f09 (i)

  then

  Returns false;

  end if;

  end loop;

  Returns true;

  end;

  Returns a null value. end; begin wwv_flow.g_boolean: = x; end;

  4

  28%

  0.09769

  0.00005

  g_f09 (1): TEST2

  4

  0%

  0.09773

  0.00010

  g_f09 (2): TEST

  4

  0%

  0.09783

  0,00003

  ...... Result = false

  4

  0%

  0.09786

  0.00004

  ...... Does NOT pass

  I created a new liquidation which uses the correct column, but at some point the validation passes and data, so I didn't get a chance to conduct tests.

• Updating of the master/detail does not work after the failure of the validation

  After validation of the judgment of the further processing of a page page page master detail, I get the error message Oracle depending on the display of the detail portion:

  < code >

  ORA: 01445: cannot select ROWID, or sample, a view of join without key preserved table.

  ORA-06510-PL/SQL unhandled exception defined by the user.

  < code >

  
  

  Clues as to why this might happen?  The master of the page displays fine as well as the validation error message personalized appropriate. It's just part of detail (from SQL-based report) that is causing the problem.  I use either a ROWID.

  
  

  Thank you!
  

  Just an info for all those who may have this same problem in the future.  I corrected the error and it had nothing to do with the ROWID or views or something like that.  Under the section of Page rendering when you set the definition of the region in the source section, I included the "order by" clause in my SQL statement.  This was the cause of my ORA-01445 error!  When I removed the clause of the definition of the source, and instead included in the attributes report by checking the box of the appropriate column sorting (which allows the apex generate so for me), the error has disappeared!  The error message Oracle NEVER would have given me a clue to what caused the error.  I joined just thinking 'what if I take the order by clause.  What's a flukey fix!

• ADF:how update attribute of link seen in master-detail relationship.

  Hi all

  I use jdev 11.1.1.5.0 version.

  I created a form master / detail using view link. My requirement is the Key attribute update sacrificed on Master table and same attribute on table automatically put details far because it fits on the link attribute.

  but his past when I change attribute link view main table, detail line stop display table.

  
  

  
  

  Thanks in advance

  Manish

  Your link on the association and for this assoc basic display, check the key attributes of the Cascade Update:

  https://blogs.Oracle.com/raghuyadav/entry/adf_entities_association_-_Cas

• Form master-detail recording detail does not with ORA-20001

  Hello
  
  I have a master/detail form, the detail record has a timestamp field that I people using systimestamp via the default, it is a single field of view and everthing records very well. But if I change the format of the timestamp field via the DD-MON-YY HH24 attrubutes column, I get the following error on save
  
  Internal error in the routine mru: ORA-20001: error in MRU: line = 1, ORA-20001: find the invalid timestamp value, please check the timestamp format.
  
  Someone knows what's goin?
  
  Thank you...

  Looks like your display only column is based on the database column.
  If this is the case, you have little control for it in ApplyMRU.
  What you need to do is
  a. keep the TimeStamp column hidden with any mask format
  b. Add the form as a table with the format mask you want to display a column of data not

  In a Word, the DB column is in the proper format as required by the ApplyMRU but you display for users of the truncated version of that.

  See you soon,.

• Validation of tabular form regarding the item master detail

  Hi guys,.
  
  I have installation master detail on my page with a layout table below.
  
  The master record has a field called RCV_QTY.
  
  The tabular presentation has a column called box_qty.
  
  What I'm trying to do is to validate it against the user to add lines in the table form which when added, is more than the amount of heading RCV_QTY.
  
  I tried the following function returns the validation text error but it's not enough work.
  
  As the line in the custom of tabular form be seen by the following SELECT INTO statements on submit, I guess I need more of a process of dynamic action type?
  
  
  DECLARE
  
  v_hdr NUMBER;
  v_line NUMBER;
  
  BEGIN
  
  SELECT hdr.rcv_qty
  IN v_hdr
  OF XXMEL_VMI_RCV_HDR_TMP hdr
  WHERE the hdr. VMI_RCV_HEADER_ID =: P2_VMI_RCV_HEADER_ID;
  
  SELECT SUM (line. BOX_QTY)
  IN v_line
  OF XXMEL_VMI_RCV_HDR_TMP hdr
  Online XXMEL_VMI_RCV_LINE_TMP
  WHERE the hdr. VMI_RCV_HEADER_ID = line. VMI_RCV_HEADER_ID
  AND hdr. VMI_RCV_HEADER_ID =: P2_VMI_RCV_HEADER_ID;
  
  
  IF (NVL(v_line,0) - NVL(v_hdr,0)) < 0
  THEN
  RETURN (' ERROR: the sum of the quantities of tag is greater than the quantity of the received header ');
  ON THE OTHER
  RETURNS A NULL VALUE.
  END IF;
  
  END;
  
  Any help would be great.
  
  I use Apex V4.0.

  Hello

  You must use the API APEX_APPLICATION total up to the Box_Qty of detail in Validation, and compare with the RCV_QTY. something like

  DECLARE
    V_BOX_TOT NUMBER := 0;
  BEGIN
    FOR I IN 1..APEX_APPLICATION.G_F01.COUNT LOOP
       V_BOX_TOT := V_BOX_TOT + TO_NUMBER( NVL(APEX_APPLICATION.G_F01(I),'0'));
   END LOOP;
   IF V_BOX_TOT > :P1_RCV_QTY THEN
      RETURN FALSE;
   ELSE
     RETURN TRUE;
   END IF;
  EXCEPTION
    .....
  END;
  

  Kind regards

• Validation of the detail in a form records master detail.

  Hi all
  
  IAM trying to validate the detail records in a form master detail. I have a check box in the detail Section. I want to add validation that all the detail records are checked or all are unchecked. To do this, I added valdation method on the entity to master, but it only runs when any attribute of the master record is changed, but not when it comes to his detail record is updated or inserted. Please tell me where I can write this validation logic or how can I trigger to perform the validation method when a child record is updated.
  
  Thank you, Pradeep

  Please ask such questions on the JDeveloper forum in the future because it is not related to the JHeadstart.

  To get the desired behavior, you must check the Association membership on the association of the entity between the master and detail EO.

  Steven Davelaar,
  Jheadstart team.

• Problem with application master / detail with AdvancedTable

  Hello
  
  We have a region of master / details in a standard way as follows.
  1. a MasterVO, a child VO, ViewLink connecting them.
  2. on the page, we have an AdvancedTable based on MasterVO and an AdvancedTable nested in a region to show/hide for more details.
  3. in the processRequest() CO, the association is defined as
  OAWebBean outerTable = (OAWebBean) webBean.findChildRecursive ("ResultsTable");
  OAWebBean innerTable = (OAWebBean) webBean.findChildRecursive ("PmtInstructionsTable");
  If (outerTable! = null) {outerTable.setAttributeValue (CHILD_VIEW_ATTRIBUTE_NAME, "PaymentServiceRequestId");
  outerTable.setAttributeValue(VIEW_LINK_NAME,"PsrToPmtInstructionsVL1") ;}
  If (innerTable! = null) {innerTable.setAttributeValue (CHILD_VIEW_ATTRIBUTE_NAME, "PaymentServiceRequestId");
  innerTable.setAttributeValue (VIEW_LINK_NAME, "PsrToPmtInstructionsVL1");
  4. When you press a button to refresh on this table, executeQuery() is called on MasterVO.
  In the test case, I change some attributes in both your. Problem here is that, after this update, the master is on the line is being updated but the detail of any line of MasterVO, is not updated DB. I confirmed this JDev logs too this detail VO query is not executed.
  It is not supposed to have the details updated through VL line?
  Try each of the following:
  a. clearCache() on innerTable
  b. executeQuery() on DetailVO during the refresh.
  c. instead of the programmatic association of the master / detail, defined the relationship of step 3
  
  It seems that AdvancedTable used to detail is cached information. How can this be avoided? Or am I missing something else?
  
  For reference,.
  CO: http://aru.us.oracle.com:8080/src/R12/120.9/ap/java/payments/psr/webui/PsrSearchCO.java & & 120.9
  VOImpl: http://aru.us.oracle.com:8080/src/R12/120.14/ap/java/payments/psr/server/PsrSearchVOImpl.java & & 120.14
  
  
  I tried to implement the various forum posts but always failed, so posting it here.
  
  Thank you
  Combet

  I had problems with the lines of childVO does not show correctly when you use a train, I have cleared the cache on the table with the following processRequest code

  Table OAAdvancedTableBean = (OAAdvancedTableBean) webBean.findChildRecursive ("childTableRN");
  table.clearCache (pageContext);

  don't know if this will help with your problem but if it's worth a mention.

  Bravo, Mike

• Validation problem unique scenario master detail.

  Hello

  I have three tables involved in a scenario master / detail.  Tables A, master, detail B and C join him table for the * to * relationship between A and B.  The Association links were already in place to illustrate the relationships.  The doDml() of the main entity was substituted to support business logic. Has also been overridden preprareForDml() method.  When running the tester Application Module to test the scenario for a single validation, the following error appears:

  

  I use Jdev 12.1.3

  in the same way as in doML():

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E12839_01/apirefs.1111/e10653/Oracle/JBO/Server/EntityImpl.html#prepareForDML%28int, %20oracle.jbo.server.TransactionEvent%29

  https://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E25178_01/Web.1111/b31974/bcrules.htm#sm0240

  but I would like to do these operations in the click on the button create/edit (before calling Commit), OR DB trigger level and then refresh the data of VO

• How to use createRowSetIterator with 3 level master-detail?

  Hi experts,

  
  I use Jdev 12.1.3 and I need to iterate over objects in view of the AM lines (I have 3 level master-detail).

  With this code, I had access to the VO parent and create an iterator:

  ViewObjectImpl viewObject = getParentVO();  
  RowSetIterator rsIterator = viewObject.createRowSetIterator(null);  
  rsIterator.reset();  
  while (rsIterator.hasNext()) {  
     Row row = rsIterator.next();  
     // DO what do you want in Row  
  }  
  rsIterator.closeRowSetIterator(); 
  

  .. .but I don't know how to create iterators according to the parent of the child

  Any idea?

  Best regards
  Jose.

  OK, suppose that a relationship of master-detail Department and employees of the HR db schema. The link to the view that defines the master detail between the tables looks like

  

  The name of the accessor is EmployeesView. In the t generate line interfaces, including the accessors

  

  Make the avlailable of the accessor to the VO clinet interface

  

  and now you can iterate the children lines as

  private static ADFLogger _logger is ADFLogger.createADFLogger (DepartmentsViewImpl.class);.

  public void dummyTest() {}

  get the first line of the departmetns

  Line first = this.first ();

  DepartmentsViewRow depRow = (DepartmentsViewRow);

  lines children handler for employees

  RowIterator empView = depRow.getEmployeesView ();

  iterate over employees of the Prime Ministry

  Line row2 = empView.first ();

  While (row2! = null) {}

  do something with line 2

  _logger.info ("Emp:" + row2.getAttribute (0));

  row2 = empView.next ();

  }

  }

  This method is implemented in the DepartmentsViewImpl class.

  Timo

• How to make a request for validation of master-detail

  Hello all;

  I have an attribute Total points in Master table... I want to apply validation on secondary table where the attribute is get marks.

  Ways to say what teacher enter brands in retail VO (attribute obtain marks) and then get marks must be equal or less then total points of master table.

  Thank you

  Concerning

  Jason Sheharyar wrote:

  Dear Ashish;

  I do the same thing... as you said... this link

  Born in DeBug: entity attribute Validation rule (business rule) from master view object attribute example ADF 11 g

  I got the error shows

  STRINGMANAGER: Key: entity.exam.classExamResultEO_Rule_0 not found in oracle.javatools.resourcebundle.ResourceBundleRT bundle

  Hi Jason,

  Do you use resource bundle in your application to display label and text?

  If Yes, then set your commit message in your xml file and put the key in handling tab of EO Validation rule failure

  then go to the source of the OT and see res_id should be identical to your key, if not then paste there

  ensure that there should be a reference for your configured resource package and go after the source XML Eo

  <>

  MsgBundleClass="mstapp.view.label.Resource"/ > / / change this according to your classpath in Java resource file guidelines

• Master detail relationship with condition enforcement in the secondary table

  Hello

  I have two tables are Dept (Master), PMCs (Detail). I have to show emp details with somewhere condition.

  Ex;

  I have a "Dept_effect_date" field in the dept table. When I m showing PGE details in the Details view, it must the EMOS who are hired after the dept_effect_date.

  Sainaba.

  Hello

  The request of the employees table looks very good. Although it seems more logical to get the service id of the employeesEO instead of DepratmentsEO.

  The next step should be to create a viewLink between the DepartmentsVO and the EmployeesVO based on the service ID field.

  Once you have done this, add the EmployeesVO as a DepartmentsVO child in yout request module (and it will appear as such in the DataControl), so use these your to create master/detail table.

  Updating the data based on the selected master will be automatically managed by ADF.

  Kind regards

  Elias.

• Strange behavior of validation with the fields 'user entered - required '.

  I have a situation where I have a form with several 'user entered - required"text fields  Some required fields are pre-populated by a server process before being presented to a user in the workspace.  When the user fills the remaining fields and submits the form (by clicking the button "Done" in the workspace), the of standard validation 'required' message, even if all required fields contain data.

  The shape where I discovered this problem is moderately complex, so I built a form simple and process to try to understand what is happening.  The simple form contains exactly two text fields, both are user entered - required.  A field is filled by a server process when the task of the associated workspace is called, B field must be filled in by the user.  There is no script customized beyond the bridge of form and a Submit button.  It's about as simple as it gets.

  If the field is filled, and then the user fills B field and click on 'Finish', the message appears saying 'at least one required field is empty... "even if the two fields contain data.

  If I return to the form and remove the B field (and redeploy the form and remember the process), to field is pre-filled and the user clicks on 'Finish', no message is displayed and the form is sent.

  As far as I know, the built-in for required fields validation works correctly only if all fields are pre-filled or none of them are pre-filled.

  Can someone explain what is happening?

  EDIT: I forgot to mention, I also created and configured an extract of the data for the simple form.  The data preview only contains a value for the to field.  When displayed in the preview of the Designer tab, everything works as expected.

  After a little work I have a better understanding of what is happening and a solution.  I have scripted several calls to xfa.host.messageBox (...) on different events.  It turns out that the pre-filled fields are not the culprit - they have values as expected.  The problem is with the non-pre-filled fields, and and a subtle behavior of the event model that causes a problem when using the workspace INTERFACE (at least on SS3).  Field values may not be resolved until a field loses focus (for example when a user moves to another field, or click a button).  Form used outside of the workspace, by clicking a "submit" button causes the focus to move to the button, which causes the values to be bound to the fields.

  Solution: Use an indirect Submit on the form button and submit indirect click handler used (in addition to your normal code):

  xfa.host.setFocus(null);
  xfa.resolveNode("[[fully qualified name of the real submit button]]").execEvent("click");
  

  Working space should detect and then make an Indirect button and run the associated click Manager, claiming in turn the form submit true button.

  This is where begins the next bit of fun: there is a bug in the form bridge (at least in the ES3 version) code prevents him from indirect detection submit buttons when you use JavaScript as a language Manager click of the button and

  Here is my hack to solve this issue:

  1. Open the 'ContainerFoundation_JS' script in the Script of Designer Editor
  2. Ignore the warning at the top of the file
  3. Find the named function: isIndirectSubmitEvent (it's on the line 1512 or something)
  4. Change the line that reads:

     • if (script.indexOf(button.name + ".execEvent") != -1) {
       

       TO:

       if (script.indexOf(button.name + ".execEvent") != -1 || script.indexOf(button.name + "\").execEvent") != -1) {
       

  5. Save and deploy the form

  If there is a better way to achieve this, please share.

• Urgent! Master - detailed with the option/Hide search

  Hello
  
  I developed a page OFA master / detail with the option/Hide.
  
  in my search option, I have main and detail columns.
  
  
  How can I control query vo level of detail.
  
  
  For example. If I pass point not in the search option as well as customer, I could get only this line item for this CUST.
  
  
  I created the main query parameters and I'm passing param values in a methos to AM.
  
  When I click on show details his exception throw.
  
  
  Can someone help me please how to do this. Its urgent...
  
  
  
  Thank you

  Hello

  Error is due to the original Version of details may not get the value of the bind variable when judicially.

  Check your steps with this link http://apps2fusion.com/at/51-ps/333-oa-framework-master-detail-region-mandatory-steps.

  If still you face the same thing then let us know.

  Kind regards
  GYAN