Validation problem unique scenario master detail.

Similar Questions

• Problem of page master details

  Hi all

  I have problem with the Master details page:

  If I change the catID after the connection to other ID to another user his show me the content? How can I restrict the user to see he's happy?

  Please your help as soon as POSSIBLE.

  Thank you and best regards,

  FAIZ ALI

  He solved

  That's what I did:

  
  

  <>

  Dim WebsiteName

  WebsiteName_cmd Dim

  WebsiteName_numRows Dim

  Set WebsiteName_cmd = Server.CreateObject ("ADODB.Command")

  WebsiteName_cmd. ActiveConnection = MM_mybag_STRING

  WebsiteName_cmd.CommandText = "SELECT * FROM WebName WHERE WebGroupID =?" and UserID =? ORDER BY WebNamID DESC '.

  WebsiteName_cmd. Prepared = true

  WebsiteName_cmd. Parameters.Append WebsiteName_cmd. CreateParameter ("param1", 5, 1, -1, WebsiteName__MMColParam1) ' adDouble

  WebsiteName_cmd. Parameters.Append WebsiteName_cmd. CreateParameter ("param2", 5, 1, -1, WebsiteName__MMColParam) ' adDouble

  Set WebsiteName = WebsiteName_cmd. Run

  WebsiteName_numRows = 0

  %>

  Thank you

• Problem with application master / detail with AdvancedTable

  Hello
  
  We have a region of master / details in a standard way as follows.
  1. a MasterVO, a child VO, ViewLink connecting them.
  2. on the page, we have an AdvancedTable based on MasterVO and an AdvancedTable nested in a region to show/hide for more details.
  3. in the processRequest() CO, the association is defined as
  OAWebBean outerTable = (OAWebBean) webBean.findChildRecursive ("ResultsTable");
  OAWebBean innerTable = (OAWebBean) webBean.findChildRecursive ("PmtInstructionsTable");
  If (outerTable! = null) {outerTable.setAttributeValue (CHILD_VIEW_ATTRIBUTE_NAME, "PaymentServiceRequestId");
  outerTable.setAttributeValue(VIEW_LINK_NAME,"PsrToPmtInstructionsVL1") ;}
  If (innerTable! = null) {innerTable.setAttributeValue (CHILD_VIEW_ATTRIBUTE_NAME, "PaymentServiceRequestId");
  innerTable.setAttributeValue (VIEW_LINK_NAME, "PsrToPmtInstructionsVL1");
  4. When you press a button to refresh on this table, executeQuery() is called on MasterVO.
  In the test case, I change some attributes in both your. Problem here is that, after this update, the master is on the line is being updated but the detail of any line of MasterVO, is not updated DB. I confirmed this JDev logs too this detail VO query is not executed.
  It is not supposed to have the details updated through VL line?
  Try each of the following:
  a. clearCache() on innerTable
  b. executeQuery() on DetailVO during the refresh.
  c. instead of the programmatic association of the master / detail, defined the relationship of step 3
  
  It seems that AdvancedTable used to detail is cached information. How can this be avoided? Or am I missing something else?
  
  For reference,.
  CO: http://aru.us.oracle.com:8080/src/R12/120.9/ap/java/payments/psr/webui/PsrSearchCO.java & & 120.9
  VOImpl: http://aru.us.oracle.com:8080/src/R12/120.14/ap/java/payments/psr/server/PsrSearchVOImpl.java & & 120.14
  
  
  I tried to implement the various forum posts but always failed, so posting it here.
  
  Thank you
  Combet

  I had problems with the lines of childVO does not show correctly when you use a train, I have cleared the cache on the table with the following processRequest code

  Table OAAdvancedTableBean = (OAAdvancedTableBean) webBean.findChildRecursive ("childTableRN");
  table.clearCache (pageContext);

  don't know if this will help with your problem but if it's worth a mention.

  Bravo, Mike

• Problem when Rollback an operation of creating scenario master / detail

  Hello.

  I use 11.1.1.7.0, and I'll try to explain my problem as clear as I could.

  I have in my DataControls

  • StateView1
    • SubstateView2

  I did drag SubstateView2 to my .jspx and create a master table - table in detail. This method works.

  My data are: State1 and State2, state3, air conditioned and have related subreports.

  Then I drag and drop a button to make the new State functionality. Create operation is called, a popup with the form is open, and it works too.

  Then I drag and drop a button to make the new subreport feature. Create1 operation is called, a popup with the form is open. This is somethig wrong.

  Suppose I chose State2.

  I click on subreport again, but I cancel the operation. Rollback is executed, and it works too.

  My question is now: I click on new New subreport button with State2 selected in the main Table. In this case:

  • I don't know how, but State1 is selected (and I did this).
  • Then, reload table detail with State1 associated subreports.
  • Popup is open to create a subreport State1 (but not State2 substate than I expected).

  What I am doing wrong? Any help would be much appreciated.

  Concerning

  Well, finally, when you close or cancelling the popup, this code works fine:

  DCIteratorBinding parentIter = ADFUtils.findIterator("StateView1Iterator");
  Key parentKey = parentIter.getCurrentRow().getKey();
  //You can add your operation code here, i have used simple Cancel operation with Rollback andExecute
  OperationBinding rollback = ADFUtils.getBindingContainer().getOperationBinding("Rollback");
  rollback.execute();
  // Execute for StateView1
  OperationBinding execute = ADFUtils.getBindingContainer().getOperationBinding("Execute");
  execute.execute();
  // Execute for SubstateView2
  OperationBinding execute1 = ADFUtils.getBindingContainer().getOperationBinding("Execute1");
  execute1.execute();
  parentIter.setCurrentRowWithKey(parentKey.toStringFormat(true));
  

• Strange problem in relationship master detail

  I have a form of purchase order that contains the editable for invoice line table. I have a commandButton control in PanelCollection surrounding table that inserts the new row into the table by running the createInsert operation. I save the purchase order including those running a business defined in ApplicationModule anyway. In this process I download the order form and assigns a primary key for buy order and the elements of each line. Now the problem is that when I enter a single line item, I get 0 topic in my business method but when I get home from two or more line items, I am everything. I get headings and order form by using the findViewObject method. Kindly help me

  I remember now that you work with JDev 11 g, then the correct Developer's guide would be called something like "the fusion developer guide.

  In the manual of 10g I was talking (B25947_01) is 26.7 section I was talking about. Here's the intro to this section:
  26.7 entity control validation of order to avoid constraint Violations
  Due to data constraints, when you perform DML operations to save changes to a
  number of entity associated with objects in the same transaction, the order in which the
  operations may be important. If you try to insert a new line containing
  references to foreign keys before inserting the line referenced, the database can
  to complain of a constraint violation. This section helps you understand the default
  prescription for the treatment of objects of entity at validation and how to
  programmatically influence this order when necessary.

  I understand that this problem is not an exact match to your question, but I have the feeling that something about this causing you problems.

  Michael F.

• Page insert mode form validation problem

  Hello

  We must implement a validation on a page (master/detail) that stores the registration and registration details.

  I place a validation of the page which should avoid duplicates of detail data using the SQL NOT EXISTS function.

  This type of validation is triggering on page editing mode, but is not when initial data is inserted.

  No idea how to fix it.

  Express Oracle 11g.

  Request Express 4.2.2.00.11

  Thanks in advance.

  You can validate the SQL query you use for validation.

  Also, please see 'Condition' of validation he go off creating and editing mode.

  Kind regards

  Hari

• Problem with page validation APEX_APPLICATion master detail.  Help!

  I'm having a problem with the Apex_Application.g_fxx data structure.  I'm trying to validate the lines in my page master detail and need to use apex_application.g_f10 as the name of the variable inside the HTML data source electricity.  The name of the item I need is "f10" because it matches the database column "status" on my page.  I'm trying to validate that all the detail items have the same status, or an error is reported.  I use the following PL/SQL block that returns a Boolean value:

  < code >

  declare
  l_first_value varchar2 (4000);
  Start

  -f10 = column PO_STATUS of PO_DETAILS table on a part as a table on the page.

  l_first_value: = apex_application.g_f10 (1);
  because me in 2... apex_application.g_f10. COUNTY
  loop
  If l_first_value! = apex_application.g_f10 (i)
  then
  Returns false;
  end if;
  end loop;
  Returns true;
  end;

  
  < code >

  The HTML data that I is not intended to "f10" are the following:

  < code >

  < td headers= "Status" class= "t20data" >

  < label for= "f10_0000" class= "hideMeButHearMe" >status< /label>

  < Select name="f10"  id="f10_0000">

  < option value= "" selected= "selected" >make a selection< /option> ""

  < option value= 'APPROVED' >APPROVED< /option>

  < option valeur= « FERMÉ » >FERMÉ< /option>

  </ Select >

  < entry type="hidden" name="f02" value=""  id="f02_0000" />

  < entry type="hidden" name="f03" value="30427" id="f03_0000" />

  < entry type= 'hidden' id= "fcs_0000" name= "fcs" value= "2158A9B101842608F4CA966C0BC1433D" >

  < entry type="hidden" id="frowid_0000" name="frowid" value="" />

  < entry type="hidden" id="fcud_0000" name="fcud" value="D" />

  </ td >

  
  

  < code >
  

  So I do not know why there could be a problem when used to work before this validation.  The PL/SQL block takes the first line of F10 data and compare it to successive lines.  If the data is not equal, then an error occurs and the user is prompted to adjust the data.

  It doesn't work anymore, although I checked and the status are still of points in F10.

  I left mouth gaping.  I do not use an official page master detail previously.  I used two separate front pages: one for the header and one for show master detail.  I've updated the page for the treatment of the more fluid user. I think that even if the data structure would be the same, but maybe I'm wrong.

  Any ideas?

  
  Thank you!

  Thank you to reproduce the problem so overall. Note that if you will share your workspace in this way you need to change your username to something else than a direct email address and don't use not the actual data for your test cases. Create a guest account to developer without administrator privileges to work space for the members of the forum to use.

  Validation in this app is coded to use a different picture of the description in this thread. Above, you have identified the point like g_f10 dashboard, but the validation code is using g_f09:

  declare
    l_first_value  varchar2(4000);
  begin
  -- f09 = PO_STATUS column of PO_DETAILS table
    l_first_value := apex_application.g_f09(1);
    for i in 2 .. apex_application.g_f09.COUNT
    loop
      if l_first_value != apex_application.g_f09(i)
      then
          return false;
      end if;
    end loop;
    return true;
  end;
  

  Therefore (thanks to instrumentation code added), the validation is running by using the values of the previous column, which was be the one that I have changed according to your instructions:

  0.09114	0,00018	... Posting type "Status check IN." -: FUNC_BODY_RETURNING_BOOLEAN	4	0%
  0.09132	0,00049	... Run the statement: select count (*) in the sys.dual where exists (Select 1 from PO_DETAILS where PO_ID =: P230_PO_ID)	4	0 g
  0.09181	0,00015	...... Result = true	4	0%
  0.09196	0.00573

  ... Run the statement: declare function x return boolean is begin declare

  l_first_value varchar2 (4000);

  Start

  -f09 = PO_STATUS table PO_DETAILS column

  l_first_value: = apex_application.g_f09 (1);

  apex_debug.message ('g_f09 (1): %s, l_first_value);

  because me in 2... apex_application.g_f09. COUNTY

  loop

  (apex_debug.message('g_f09(%s): %s, i, apex_application.g_f09 (i));

  If l_first_value! = apex_application.g_f09 (i)

  then

  Returns false;

  end if;

  end loop;

  Returns true;

  end;

  Returns a null value. end; begin wwv_flow.g_boolean: = x; end;

  4

  28%

  0.09769

  0.00005

  g_f09 (1): TEST2

  4

  0%

  0.09773

  0.00010

  g_f09 (2): TEST

  4

  0%

  0.09783

  0,00003

  ...... Result = false

  4

  0%

  0.09786

  0.00004

  ...... Does NOT pass

  I created a new liquidation which uses the correct column, but at some point the validation passes and data, so I didn't get a chance to conduct tests.

• Master / detail createInsert jumping required attributes validation with part delivery = true

  Hi all

  I use JDev 11.1.1.7.0

  I created master / detail on table emp dept and slipped and fell from CreateInsert in both tables.

  I put partial Submit true for these two buttons.

  Scenario: when I add a record in the master and try to add another rec, mandatory validation fires and it doesnot allow me to add new rec if already a rec void is there.

  But after adding in master, if I add a new rec in child, isn't shooting the validation of required attributes in the parent table. So a new blank record is created is in the child. ]

  If I put part delivery = false for child createInsert, fires of validation.

  Question: in my application, I set partialSubmit = true to CreateInsert child. Although I gave the partial trigger for the main table, validation of required attributes is not get fired for master.

  How to solve this? User should not be able to add a record of the child without filling out the required attributes

  
  

  
  

  < af:form id = "f1" >

  < af:panelStretchLayout id = "PSL1" topHeight = "400px" >

  < f: facet name = "center" >

  < af:panelCollection id = "pc1" >

  < f: facet name = "toolbar" >

  < af:toolbar id = "t4" >

  < af:commandButton actionListener = "#{bindings." CreateInsert1.execute}"text ="CreateInsert1. "

  Disabled = "#{!}" bindings. CreateInsert1.enabled}" id ="cb2" partialSubmit ="true"/ >

  < / af:toolbar >

  < / f: facet >

  < af:table value = "#{bindings." Var EmployeeVO1.collectionModel}"="row ".

  lines = ' #{bindings. " EmployeeVO1.rangeSize}.

  emptyText = "#{bindings." EmployeeVO1.viewable? "{'No data to display.': 'Access Denied.'}".

  fetchSize = "#{bindings." EmployeeVO1.rangeSize}' rowBandingInterval = '0 '.

  filterModel = "#{bindings." EmployeeVO1Query.queryDescriptor}.

  queryListener = ' #{bindings. " FilterVisible EmployeeVO1Query.processQuery}"="true"varStatus ="vs. "

  selectedRowKeys = ' #{bindings. " EmployeeVO1.collectionModel.selectedRow}.

  selectionListener = "#{bindings." RowSelection EmployeeVO1.collectionModel.makeCurrent}' = 'single '.

  id = « t2 » "" partialTriggers = ": cb2: pc2:t1: pc2:cb1">

  < / af:table >

  < / af:panelCollection >

  < / f: facet >

  < f: facet = 'top' name >

  < af:panelCollection id = "pc2" >

  < f: facet name = "toolbar" >

  < af:toolbar id = 't3' >

  < af:commandButton actionListener = "#{bindings." CreateInsert.execute text}"="CreateInsert. "

  Disabled = "#{!}" bindings. CreateInsert.enabled}" id ="cb1"partialSubmit ="true"/ >

  < / af:toolbar >

  < / f: facet >

  < af:table value = "#{bindings." Var DepartmentVO1.collectionModel}"="row ".

  lines = ' #{bindings. " DepartmentVO1.rangeSize}.

  emptyText = "#{bindings." DepartmentVO1.viewable? "{'No data to display.': 'Access Denied.'}".

  fetchSize = "#{bindings." DepartmentVO1.rangeSize}' rowBandingInterval = '0 '.

  filterModel = "#{bindings." DepartmentVO1Query.queryDescriptor}.

  queryListener = ' #{bindings. " FilterVisible DepartmentVO1Query.processQuery}"="true"varStatus ="vs. "

  selectedRowKeys = ' #{bindings. " DepartmentVO1.collectionModel.selectedRow}.

  selectionListener = "#{bindings." RowSelection DepartmentVO1.collectionModel.makeCurrent}' = 'single '.

  id = « t1 » "" partialTriggers = ": cb1: pc1:cb2">

  < / af:table >

  < / af:panelCollection >

  < / f: facet >

  < / af:panelStretchLayout >

  < / af:form >

  
  

  
  

  Kind regards

  Deepti
  

  This means that it is a bug

  If you put your version Jdev or submit together partial false to get it working in the current version

  and drop a SR with Oracle Support

  Ashish

• Master detail problem

  Scenario is,

  I have a form master detail. using DBSequence on the two keys on the master and detail. But I am facing problem Parent key not found do not where to insert data. I think that Seqnce with master detail creating problem

  J Dev Version: 11.1.2.0.0

  Consult the:

  http://Ahmed-alzamer.blogspot.com/2013/09/entities-Association-not-composition.html

  Liu Wuhua technology and learning of Notes: insert master / detail in ADF BC

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E23943_01/Web.1111/b31974/bcadveo.htm#ADFFD1149

• Updating of the master/detail does not work after the failure of the validation

  After validation of the judgment of the further processing of a page page page master detail, I get the error message Oracle depending on the display of the detail portion:

  < code >

  ORA: 01445: cannot select ROWID, or sample, a view of join without key preserved table.

  ORA-06510-PL/SQL unhandled exception defined by the user.

  < code >

  
  

  Clues as to why this might happen?  The master of the page displays fine as well as the validation error message personalized appropriate. It's just part of detail (from SQL-based report) that is causing the problem.  I use either a ROWID.

  
  

  Thank you!
  

  Just an info for all those who may have this same problem in the future.  I corrected the error and it had nothing to do with the ROWID or views or something like that.  Under the section of Page rendering when you set the definition of the region in the source section, I included the "order by" clause in my SQL statement.  This was the cause of my ORA-01445 error!  When I removed the clause of the definition of the source, and instead included in the attributes report by checking the box of the appropriate column sorting (which allows the apex generate so for me), the error has disappeared!  The error message Oracle NEVER would have given me a clue to what caused the error.  I joined just thinking 'what if I take the order by clause.  What's a flukey fix!

• Unique constraint in the form of master detail error

  Hi all

  I need help, the following requirement.

  I have a master detail form developed on master-child table. the tables have the composite key.

  Old masters has a composite key on columns (A, B)

  Children table has a composite key on columns (A, B, C)

  Child block look something like below

  C       A          B

  10 AAA 1000

  20 1300 BBB

  30 CCC 1400

  40 DDD 1200

  Increments of column C with 10 for each record, and if a new record is insert in intermediaries the records it is incremented to 5.

  My requirement is when an end user attempts to insert record between 20 and 30 or 30 and 40 and clicks on save, the value of the C column must regenerate as shown below

  C       A          B

  10 AAA 1000

  20 1300 BBB

  XXX 30 900

  40 CCC 1400

  50 DDD 1200

  Button Save I wrote the following code

  Declare
    ln_Count NUMBER :=0;
    ln_c number :=0
    cursor c1 is
    select c
    from child
    where a=:child.a
    and b=:child.b
  Begin
    Go_Block('Child');
    First_Record;
    LOOP
    ln_Count:= ln_Count+10;
    :child.C := ln_Count;
    EXIT When :System.Last_Record = 'TRUE';
    Next_Record;
    END LOOP;
  
  
    For c_cur in c1 Loop
    update child
    set c:=ln_c+10
    where a=:child.a
    and b=:child.b 
    and c=c_cur.c
    end loop;
    Forms_DDL('commit');
       
       commit_prc('Commit');  -- We have our own program unit to call commit_form
  
  END;
  

  I tried above in a way because, before approving the changes to the table, I update the existing values in the table of the C column so I would not get unique constraint error.

  When you click the button Save, I get a constraint exception. Hope I made my requirement clear.

  Can someone give me a clue to this implementation.

  Thank you

  malandain

  With this update, all your C-columnvalue became negative. When you post the form thereafter, forms update agaion records one by one the new positive figures. Because the numbers of 'old' in the db are now negative, there will be no violation-UK.

• Problem of master / detail

  Hello

  I have 3 blocks in my form

  control unit 1 for the search criteria.

  2. master / detail blocks (2), where ownership of the main block clause is "' item_id =: search.item_id", the block of research concerns the search criteria (control block), "

  -: search.item_id is what I am looking for with its value.

  I open the form, I write 2 the: search.item_id, the data is retrieved in the main blocks and details, but what happens is that when I change the "2" "3"

  the data contained in the block of retail have disappeared, and the data in the master is still such what without change, I don't know why.

  I am sure that he has given belong to the number '3 '.

  -the search button has this code:

  go_block ('stock');      -stock is the main block.

  execute_query;

  Thanks for the reply,

  1. I found the problem,

  There is a function in the form

  function qty return number is
  begin
  select something , something2 , something3
  into :item1 , :item2 , :item3
  from dual ;
  return 6 ;
  end ;
  

  and there was an article that I created to entrust this function as a formula, but I think that the function that create must return a variable not a number.

  and this variable should be in the clause 'in', he has solved when I changed it.

  2-i, created a control block, because the user can change the item_id and save the form, does not search form, then it will update the data. right?

• Problem with vertical scroll bar of the block master detail

  Have a TC of canvas by tabs with 3 tabs - tab A, B and C

  Tab C contains a block of master child multi. Each block can display 5 records.

  C tab

  -> Master Block can display 5 records

  -> Child block can show 5 records. Child block has nearly 20 columns to display. It is therefore a big canvas

  question

  It comes with vertical toolbars on Master Block and child block.

  The horizontal toolbar works very well.

  But if there are more than 5 records, we are not able to scroll the vertical toolbar.

  Remember reading somewhere that for a block of single bar scrolling can be active. Please specify if this is correct and indicate what are the appropriate actions that we can take.

  Thank you

  951614 wrote:

  But if there are more than 5 records, we are not able to scroll the vertical toolbar.

  You have a separate master and detail block, right scroll bar?

  If so, then which bar scroll creating problem for you, master? detail? or both?

  Make sure you have the block with the appropriate scroll bar card, it can possible you have set the bar of scrolling detail with master block and main scroll bar with detail block.

  951614 wrote:

  Remember reading somewhere that for a block of single bar scrolling can be active. Please specify if this is correct and indicate what are the appropriate actions that we can take.

  It is not correct.

  You used the scroll bar with individual block. There is no restriction.

• Validation of tabular form regarding the item master detail

  Hi guys,.
  
  I have installation master detail on my page with a layout table below.
  
  The master record has a field called RCV_QTY.
  
  The tabular presentation has a column called box_qty.
  
  What I'm trying to do is to validate it against the user to add lines in the table form which when added, is more than the amount of heading RCV_QTY.
  
  I tried the following function returns the validation text error but it's not enough work.
  
  As the line in the custom of tabular form be seen by the following SELECT INTO statements on submit, I guess I need more of a process of dynamic action type?
  
  
  DECLARE
  
  v_hdr NUMBER;
  v_line NUMBER;
  
  BEGIN
  
  SELECT hdr.rcv_qty
  IN v_hdr
  OF XXMEL_VMI_RCV_HDR_TMP hdr
  WHERE the hdr. VMI_RCV_HEADER_ID =: P2_VMI_RCV_HEADER_ID;
  
  SELECT SUM (line. BOX_QTY)
  IN v_line
  OF XXMEL_VMI_RCV_HDR_TMP hdr
  Online XXMEL_VMI_RCV_LINE_TMP
  WHERE the hdr. VMI_RCV_HEADER_ID = line. VMI_RCV_HEADER_ID
  AND hdr. VMI_RCV_HEADER_ID =: P2_VMI_RCV_HEADER_ID;
  
  
  IF (NVL(v_line,0) - NVL(v_hdr,0)) < 0
  THEN
  RETURN (' ERROR: the sum of the quantities of tag is greater than the quantity of the received header ');
  ON THE OTHER
  RETURNS A NULL VALUE.
  END IF;
  
  END;
  
  Any help would be great.
  
  I use Apex V4.0.

  Hello

  You must use the API APEX_APPLICATION total up to the Box_Qty of detail in Validation, and compare with the RCV_QTY. something like

  DECLARE
    V_BOX_TOT NUMBER := 0;
  BEGIN
    FOR I IN 1..APEX_APPLICATION.G_F01.COUNT LOOP
       V_BOX_TOT := V_BOX_TOT + TO_NUMBER( NVL(APEX_APPLICATION.G_F01(I),'0'));
   END LOOP;
   IF V_BOX_TOT > :P1_RCV_QTY THEN
      RETURN FALSE;
   ELSE
     RETURN TRUE;
   END IF;
  EXCEPTION
    .....
  END;
  

  Kind regards

• Validation of the detail in a form records master detail.

  Hi all
  
  IAM trying to validate the detail records in a form master detail. I have a check box in the detail Section. I want to add validation that all the detail records are checked or all are unchecked. To do this, I added valdation method on the entity to master, but it only runs when any attribute of the master record is changed, but not when it comes to his detail record is updated or inserted. Please tell me where I can write this validation logic or how can I trigger to perform the validation method when a child record is updated.
  
  Thank you, Pradeep

  Please ask such questions on the JDeveloper forum in the future because it is not related to the JHeadstart.

  To get the desired behavior, you must check the Association membership on the association of the entity between the master and detail EO.

  Steven Davelaar,
  Jheadstart team.