Membership of rule complex

Similar Questions

• CPU AND ram supermetric of use

  Hi all

  I use vcops 5.7

  I need the alarm when using cpu and ram are two < 40% for a week on a host system.

  I think a supermetric can help me, but I don' t know how.

  I think that something like this:

  If (< 40 CPU usage) AND (use of mem < 40) then supermetricvalue = 1

  can I define a KPI like this: If supermetricvalue = 1 to 840 collection and then alarm

  but I don't know if it is possible to define a supermetric like that.

  Any suggestion?

  Thank you

  IG

  better try this with an alert at several levels.

  Help:

  ------------

  Configuration of Mulitilevel alert rules

  You can configure alert rules complex that evaluate several conditions on related resources. For example, you can write an alert multi-level rule that generates an alert if the workload on a VM exceeds A to B cycles, health is less than C and the host CPU usage is greater than the dynamic threshold.

  Because the conditions of hard threshold in several levels alert rules generate no additional alerts, multilevel warning function reduces the number of alerts and allows you to that you will concentrate only on important alerts.

  Alert rules several levels do not have a specific alert type in vCenter Operations Manager user interface. The user interface displays an alert at several levels in the form of alerts KPI HT, but the alert description identifies the alert for Multi level rule. Triggers and the details of the rule appear in the pane of the reason on the Details of the alert page. Multi-level alerts are also visible as violation HT KP in mashup for the alert graphic and INFO displays the details of the rule.

  ------------

• How to consume specific complextype in several xsd complextypes

  Hi all

  Here below the xsd I need to consume the subject, he has 7 complex types and 5 common elements for all complex types. In my project, we maintain simple xsd. My requirement is I have to create the proxy service (Customer Service), every time that membership or email complex type produce section. I mean that we maintain different target systems. I need to build a target for members and e-mail system.  I know how to create the customer service, but I do not know how to validate the Member-specific data and email. When I consume the payload form my payload section can has my complex types required or not. If she has, I would like to carry the data, otherwise not. Could you please tell me how to validate it.

  I don't want to use the Action validate because someone used this action when they produced in the topic.

  < ns0:action > < / ns0:action >

  < ns0:memberNumber > < / ns0:memberNumber >

  < ns0:acxiomkey > < / ns0:acxiomkey >

  < ns0:studentUserid > < / ns0:studentUserid >

  < ns0:studemtName > < / ns0:studemtName >

  < ns0: Individual / > [ComplexType]

  < ns0:Membership / > [ComplexType]

  < ns0:Address / > [ComplexType]

  < ns0:Email / > [ComplexType]

  < ns0:phone / > [ComplexType]

  < ns0:Certification / > [ComplexType]

  < ns0: Profile / > [ComplexType]

  Thank you

  You can use the Validate action to validate the data you receive in the payload of the request against wsdl or schema validation... Or you can just add if condition that has fn: contains the function to check the tag membership or by e-mail in the request payload. If one of them is to present the process other data will leave the service.

  I hope this helps.

  Kind regards

  Karan

• Role membership rule does not

  Hi guys,.

  When I create a role and assign 'rule of membership', the members appear in the preview screen.

  But they may not see the place in the screen of the members of this role.

  My environment is 11 GR 2 SP1.

  It works fine in GR 11, 2 base. But some Pack bundle and then it doesn't.

  1. is it normal?

  2. If so, why is it changed?

  3 and how shoul I assign members to the role?

  (as a solution, I modified the memner arrtibute. = > does not)

  and restart IOM, = > still does not

  and restart the server. (> still does not...)

  can anyone help with this?

  Kind regards

  dongsu

  There is a bug similar to oracle support. There is a workaround solution given but the fix for OIM11gr2ps1 would be in BP4 and later versions

  IOM R2 - when we create a basic role of rule in IOM - UI does not show the results in 'Direct' or 'All' (Doc ID 1598658.1)

  Bug 17362271 : IOM R2 - WHERE WE CREATE a ROLE of BASIS of RULE IN the IOM - UI DOES NOT SHOW RESULTS

• Unrecognized in Excel Docs membership rule.

  Hello

  I have defined a membership rule in a WORD doc and try to use the same relationship (used in the membership rule) to define the scope of an entity in the EXCEL doc.

  But it throws an error that "function not supported. This function cannot be used in rules modeled with EXCEL.

  Please help me with an alternative solution.

  Any suggestion is welcome.

  Essentially scope functions (everything that has an alias as a potential parameter) do not have a metaphor for representation available in Excel matching rule and are therefore not supported. However the other functions of the entity are supported (exists, forall, instancecount etc.).

  According to the request of Andrew: If you can explain what you're trying to do (and why do you think Excel is the best option for this) then we can help.

  But yes: some things cannot be done in Word.

• Complex "validation rule" using Java Bean code

  Hello
  
  I've never used with jdeveloper validation rules, but I need a complex validation rule to a column of my table.
  
  Can I put a 'validation rule' on an attribute of an object of display or on a column in a table, using the Bean code?
  
  My column must contain different values depending on the other columns in the table, so I think I can't do this without java code...
  
  I tried to doubleClick on column to create a validator, but I put a 'printing' inside and saw that running many times, but I want to run validation only when the value of the column change!
  
  How can I do this? What should I use?
  
  Kind regards
  Trigger

  Trigger,

  If you want to validate an attribute that is dependent on another attribute - you must upgrade the VO (or EO), not at the level of the attribute. You can write a validator method (which is a Java method) to achieve this. I don't think that nini will work for postings that depend on several attributes.

  John

• How to create LDAP filter rule to verify membership in a group of OAM

  Hi people,
  
  I have a hard time to create an allow rule to verify membership in one group ldap. I followed article "Configure a user authorization" of the Oracle's (http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E10761_01/doc/oam.1014/b32420/v2authz.htm#BABHBFEJI) Web site and created an authorization plan w. ldap_attribute_name as a parameter of the user and ruleExpression as a required parameter. Then, within my policy, I created an authorization based on my plan w. attrib Authz rule to allow access rule based on the filter that looks like this:
  LDAP://LDAP_SERVER:port / or = People, o = Company, c = US? void? (ldap_attribute_name = ldap_attribute_value)
  It works very well.
  
  Now, I've added another rule based on the filter under the same Authz rule/allow access:
  LDAP://LDAP_SERVER:port / or = Groups, o = Company, c = US? uniqueMember? SUP? (& (objectClass = groupOfUniqueNames)(cn=ldap_group_name))
  While the query looks somewhat OK and works as a (slightly modified format) command line argument, it does not in OAM (means people w on req group membership - d can still connect).
  
  Can someone direct me to the right direction concerning the I do:
  1 change/correction of the ldap query
  2. create new Authz uniqueMember userParameter regime; create new rule Authz based on a schema new authz; Create new filtering rule to allow access with the ldap query that I
  3. do sth else
  
  Any help is greatly appreciated.
  Thank you, novel

  Can you explain to me how you have implemented the solution 2, which should work for any kind of group with any LDAP filter.

  Is a fundamental error, which I think you do, you provide a filter for group to the RULE, which will be always true because this filter can not contain the Member attribute. This is why you will always have access.
  This is the reason why you need to have a plugin custom to get the correct value.

  Sagar

• 10g membership rule does not get an assessment

  In 10 G, I created a rule to assign to a grave Group.User of IOM in the criteria of the rule bt still the user is not assigned to this group of IOM. Any ideas anyone?

  You use the fields of the UDF in the assessment of the rules? I think I saw some problem where the length of the UDF could cause problems. You can try the rule with a few other UDF?

  -Marie

• Implement the map with complex to associate the rule of

  Hello
  
  How can I implement this MERGE statement in OWB 11G mapping (TARGET_TABLE are not all unique constraints):
  merge into TARGET_TABLE t
  using
  (select key key_value, param_low, param_high look_up_table) mq
  on (t.lookup_key = mq.key
  and t.param between mq.param_low and mq.param_high
  )
  when matched, then update set t.updated_field = mq.key_value
  
  How can I use 'between' statement in game? Or OWB can generate MERGE statement only with the '=' operator in the section WE (...), isn't?
  
  Published by: ABelash on December 9, 2008 10:52

  You need not use the match by constraints for fusion.

  If you change the game by the constraints of 'NO_CONSTRAINTS' scoreboard operator property, you can set the columns of criteria for (the columns to match by updating the line and ensure that these columns are not also defined to "load the column when new line"). This will give you your x = y part of the "merger on." There is also a filter to target for the property update on the target table operator, now the expression builder allows you to use the columns in the target table operator... but... these columns do not need to be all real columns in a table, you can add one or two columns start_date and end_date to scoreboard operator and their map of the flow and then use them in the target for the expression filter update to make the hiring between start_date and end_date date clause type. (The downside is that if you were doing an outgoing combine/synchronize these columns would be added to the table in OWB.)

  I hope this makes some sense, otherwise, I can post an example to illustrate.

  See you soon
  David

• quick way to add multiple subnets of Server 2008 firewall rules?

  I set up a firewall in windows server 2008.  I need to add several subnets to a rule for inbound traffic, but it is making me add subnets one at a time.  Is it possible to add several subnets simultaneously?  I tried separating them by commas and add them via the GUI, but he wouldn't take it (he said that specify an address valid).  Also if you have already entered a long list of subnets in a firewall rule is it possible to copy it to another firewall rule?

  Hi Goatberg,

  Your question of Windows Server 2008 is more complex than what is typically covered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the IT Pro TechNet public. Please post your question in the Technet Forum. You can follow the link to your question:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/WindowsServer

• Details of complexity of password on vista or windows 7

  In previous versions of Windows, when a user changes his password, but fails to meet the requirements of the password policy domain, the error message was very helpful (though this KB821425 done better). However, in Vista and windows 7, we seem to have worsened. He said just now. "Unable to update the password. The value provided for the new password does not meet the length, complexity, or requirements in the history of the area. "That doesn't tell the user WHAT are the requirements in detail; That is to say: the number of characters, what are the rules of complexity or how many passwords is stored (unlike XP, 2003, 2000, etc.).

  Is there a way to fix this?

  Hi Santosh,

  It seems that it is not possible in Windows 7. If you want to provide feedback about this, then make reference to:

  Windows 7 comments

• Calculation of rule DSP for voice routers

  Hi all, I know that Cisco has a DSP calculator, however, there are some values that he asks that I'm not sure of when you try to use it.

  Someone at - it a fundamental rule that they use when they decide how much DSP to add a router to voice FMC?

  I have a Cisco 2911 with 1 VIC2-4FXO, 1 port VIC3-2FXS/DID and currently I have a PVDM3 DSP DIMM 1 with 16 channels. I would add a VIC2-2FXO card for additional analog lines. I read that you need at least to have the same number or channels that you have FXS/FXO ports. If this is the case, then I am currently using only 6 of the 16 channels.

  Here is the command of DSP Group:

  DSP groups on slot 0:
  DSP 1:
  State: UP, firmware: 32.1.2
  Signal/voice of max channel: 16/16
  Max credits: 240, voice credits: 240, video credits: 0
  num_of_sig_chnls_allocated: 6
  Transcoding allocated channels: 1
  Group: FLEX_GROUP_VOICE, complexity: FLEX
  Credit splitting: 100, reserved credits: 0
  Signs of the allocated channels: 6
  Voice of the allocated channels: 0
  Appropriations used (rounded): 0
  Group: FLEX_GROUP_XCODE, complexity: MEDIUM
  Credit splitting: 0, reserved credits: 20
  Transcoding allocated channels: 0
  Appropriations used (rounded): 0
  Group: FLEX_GROUP_CONF, complexity: CONFERENCE
  Credit splitting: 0, reserved credits: 120
  Codec: CONF_G729, maximum of participants: 8
  Sessions by dsp: 4
  Slot: 0
  Idx device: 0
  PVDM slots: 0
  Type DSP: SP2600

  Thank you

  Dan

  Yes, the most basic math are need at least the same number of channels on your DSP (s) that you would have TDM0 channels, which means that you will only use G.711, because the number of channels, G.711. This just for the termination of the TDM.

  With what you have, if you decide to use G.729A/G.722, it would come down to 12 channels, with G.729/iLBC drops to 10, and you get only 3 channels, if you use the ICCS.

• Differentiated assessment posture based on membership of AD machine.

  Hello everyone

  You guys you have a document or an idea on how to start to set up a policy to assess a host based on its members? Essentially two groups, desktop computers and laptops and both have different requirements to be declared compliant.

  Authentication machine and user are works well, and is based on the user posture. The requirements for desktop computers and laptops have already been created, but I can't figure out how to link them to the Organization of machine units. User accounts have no attribute based on the machine.
  Posture can operate at the level of the computer?

  Tips, ideas and docs are always welcome.

  Running distributed ISE 1.3.

  Thank you!
  Guido

  Hi new Guido, what you can do is the following:

  -Put all the laptops in their own security group in AD

  -Place all the workstations in their own security group in AD

  -At ISE, in the policy framework > Posture: you can create different rules are put in correspondence with the specific AD group membership

  With regard to the documentation here is an older guide written by TAC:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/identity-Services-engine/116143-config-CISE-posture-00.html

  In addition, the book of Cisco Press ISE is a very good resource:

  http://www.CiscoPress.com/store/Cisco-ISE-for-BYOD-and-secure-unified-access-9780133103656

  I hope this helps!

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• Rules of ISDN GW 3241

  Hi all

  I have set up next week an ISDN gw 3241.  I've done a few readig on it (the user guide and other cisco docs).

  In my implementation we hane one ISDN gw with 1 E1 (several DID).  several points of video endpoints (VEP) will use this ISDN gw.

  All IP VEP are registed to the VCS.

  I want to set it up this way:

  IP for ISDN

  No matter what IP VEP, when calling IE 88XXXXXXX (88 is the prefix of video isdn gw), the call will be routed to the ISDN GW.

  ISDN to IP

  If the remote call of VEP ISDN GW number + 44335xxxx01, call get routed to IP VEP1

  If the remote call of VEP ISDN GW number + 44335xxxx02, call get routed to IP VEP2

  If the remote call of VEP ISDN GW number + 44335xxxx03, call get routed to IP VEP3

  If another number in this range is this is to say composed + 3245xxxx06, appeal to be rejected.

  Can someone share some shots of a configuration of ISDN gw with commentary and similar rules? Thanks in advance.

  Kind regards

  Hi friend

  With regard to the fraud free, I usually use a simple methodology that brings a security level pleasant without requiring a complex configuration. CPL is a nice option too, but it's too complex in some environment, and it is difficult to manage and troubleshoot in my opinion.

  Normally I restrict access to the ISDN gateway by only search rules. Try this:

  1. Let's say your code access to the PSTN is 9. If your end points would call a PSTN number dial 9 + number.
  2. Let's say that your ISDN gateway is to register the prefix 9 for VCS, so that when you dial 9XXXX the call is routed to the ISDN gateway that is registered in the local area of VCS
  3. Create a rule to search specific to ISDN calls, see example below, examine the marks:

  

  Please, follow all the instructions, I mentioned above, it is so important.

  If you have several access codes to the PSTN, you can create several rules of research as a result of this procedure, or you can use a regex to sum up the roads. For example, let's say you have 99, 98 and 97 as codes PSTN, your template string may be (99 | 98 | 97) \d*. This route matches any number including the prefix is 97 or 98 or 99.

  Another important consideration is, if you have PSTN access codes (not having not makes no sense), you need to design a numbering plan that avoidsmismatch between your access codes to the PSTN and your alias and routes. It is extremely important! For example, the suggestion that I placed above, you should not have any endpoint whose alias begins in 9 , because it would result in a conflict with your ISDN search rules.

  Prior to performing any configuration, save time for thinking and planning. I also suggest make you several test after the implementation of your ISDN integration with free fraud prevention.

  I hope that this is useful.

  Best regards

  Paulo Souza

  Please note the answers and mark it as "answered" as appropriate.

• Return TopCPU process variable rule data

  I try to customize the rule runaway_process and have some difficulty to retrieve the values of the data model. The goal is to have an email sent when this rule fires for some hostnames. The scope was pretty easy, but get the values of process variables to be included in the e-mail message is a challenge.

  The rule is defined in the TopCPU table and below that is Process_TopCPU. Can I return the latest value data there with:

  Server.get("DataService").retrieveLatestValue (Scope, "Process_TopCPU"). GetValue()

  However, this seems to return the rows in the table of 5 albums processes. I want to return the details (order, Pct_CPU) from the top of the page process only and looks like you have to go a little further below and pull data from Process_TopCPU_Entry. I do not understand how to return these individual values but... can anyone help with this?

  The difficulty here is that the Observations are so-called Observation complex (several processes CPU high of perception at any time)

  The following Scriptlet will work (assuming you reach on the host object.)

  It will search all ALBUMS of Cpu processes in the current collection that correspond to a specific filter criteria and create a string that contains name and uses CPU for each of them. I hope this will help you to build your own version for your use case.

  // Define the filter closure. you could do this inline but I like to declare this on it's own section for readabillitydef filter = { processEntry->  return processEntry.cpuUsage > 0.03}
  
  // use teh find Observation entries function which is part of the Foglight core functionallity and filter for Processes that use more then 2% CPU in my casedef entries = findObservationEntries(#topCPUProcesses from $scope.cpus#,filter)
  
  // Header def msg =  "Processes with high CPU Usage :\n"
  
  // create a single line for each process using a GString templatemsg += entries.collect{ "Name: $it.command  cpu: ${it.cpuUsage *100} %"}.join("\n")
  
  // return the message return msg  
  

  I've also attached a screenshot which describes the function used