Similar Questions

• 10g membership rule does not get an assessment

  In 10 G, I created a rule to assign to a grave Group.User of IOM in the criteria of the rule bt still the user is not assigned to this group of IOM. Any ideas anyone?

  You use the fields of the UDF in the assessment of the rules? I think I saw some problem where the length of the UDF could cause problems. You can try the rule with a few other UDF?

  -Marie

• E-mail rule does not always work.

  I have attached a copy of this message and the State which must have managed to get rid of it. If I change the rule and apply it, it works, but tomorrow if I get a similar message, the rule does not work. What's wrong?

  Thank you, Fred

  Try to delete the order and leave just the command Delete.  Back up e-mail in the junk mail folder in the Inbox and use the menu option Message ➙ apply rules to see if that solves it.

  

• ORA-01917: user or role ' OPS$ MSMIT110 ' does not exist

  Hi all

  I have a user OPS$ msmit110 in my database KONQ. I want to revoke create session privilege from this account. But when I try, I get error ORA-01917 same account already exists in the database. Here are the details:

  
  

  Konq > select name, open_mode from v$ database;

  NAME OPEN_MODE

  --------- ----------

  KONQ READ WRITE

  Konq > select username, account_status, profile from dba_users where username = ' OPS$ msmit110 ";

  USERNAME ACCOUNT_STATUS PROFILE

  ------------------------------ -------------------------------- ------------------------------

  OPS$ msmit110 OPEN ENDUSER_PROFILE

  Konq > select the BENEFICIARY, the PRIVILEGE of dba_sys_privs where DEALER = ' OPS$ msmit110 ";

  HOLDER OF PRIVILEGE

  ------------------------------ ----------------------------------------

  OPS$ msmit110 CREATE SESSION

  Konq > revoke create session to OPS$ msmit110;

  Revoke create session to OPS$ msmit110

  *

  ERROR on line 1:

  ORA-01917: user or role ' OPS$ MSMIT110 ' does not exist

  Please let me know the reason behind it and please help how can I solve this problem.

  Kind regards

  Michel

  > revoke create session to OPS$ msmit110;

  not as above but as below

  Revoke create session of "OPS$ msmit110";

• Rule does not fire

  Hi, I wrote a custom rule for checking a failover from the primary to a database of pending. The agent runs very well - without problems. Any other rule based on this agent also works. Information based on:

  The agent collects among other database status - which is a StringObservation. Te PRIMARY, STANDBY PHYSICAL values. Now I will inform each other DBA that a database from the database role.

  Scoping:

  _Table

  Data-driven

  Rule multiSeverity:

  Cond WARNING:

  def statusListe is server. DataService.retrieveLastNValues(scope,"database_role",2).value

  If (statusListe.size == 2) {}

  return statusListe [0]! = statusListe [1]

  } else return false;

  MessageText: whatever it is, all tested (with or without severity-level variables)

  If a failover is taken I don't receive any of my rule. But the condition in the rule editor (Scoped th my database) is true. Actual values:

  return the server. DataService.retrieveLastNValues(scope,"database_role",5).value--> [PRIMARY, PRIMARY, STANDBY PHYSICS, PHYSICAL STANDBY, PRIMARY]

  To test, I changed the rule also hunted time (30 years), but the result is the same - in no case.

  FMS is 5.5.4.7. Tips are welcome.

  Concerning

  Jochen

  Hi all

  solution of the problem of the rule:

  If a rule condition works with the server. DataService and that you do not use the ' #metric / observation #' notation in your rule, the services of the State has no knowledge on the correct extended metric and does not trigger the rule. The solution is quite simple:

  make a false definition with the notation "#". In my case:

  def a = #database_role #;

  It works, the rule fires.

  Concerning

  Jochen

• FVS336Gv3 multi-NAT inbound firewall rules does not

  I have about 30 Netgear FVS338 and a few FVS336Gv2 routers in use. I use for firewall and provide multi-NAT between industrial machines and WAN. The configuration was changed on Gv3 models and I can't get an answer behind the firewall or router in the diagnostics page when you use the WAN address.

  In the examples below the WAN is 10.62.

  

  Figure 1. Two different devices with two different configuration options.

  

  Figures 2 and 3. The first is bad - it would only connect from this address. Have I set up another correctly to the NAT WAN to LAN 10.3.110.215 address 10.62.31.55 address?

  Q1: Is Figure 3 configured correctly?

  Q2: Why is it forcing me to create a range of addresses? On the older routers, I had the opportunity to address.

  Q3: Is anyone aware of any problem with this router?

  For anyone having the same problem, the FVS336Gv3 requires the manual addition of each new address WAN-side. He is buried in the menu structure:

  

  Figure 1. Network configuration | WAN settings | WAN configuration. WAN1 - Edit.

  

  Figure 2. Select the secondary addresses.

  

  Figure 3. Add the required WAN addresses.

  Now configure the inbound firewall rules:

  

  Figure 4. Security | Firewall rules. Add or change. Note that the WAN secondary addresses are available in the drop-down list address WAN IP.

  Password

  There seems to be a problem with this router about the session timeout. I got them several times on the navigation menu and log on again and renavigate. Idle time-out is set to 90 minutes. I never saw this problem on routers earlier.

  Also, note that the password field now has a limited character set. for example, it does not accept ' $'.

• ACS 'Password change rule' does not work with telnet

  Hello:

  I am configuring users will have to change their password when they enter a network device, the first time they connect.

  I have a camera ACS 4.0, the option "disable TELNET change password against this ACS and send the following message to the telnet users session" is disable. When I try to enter in a Catalyst 6500, for example, I type user and pass and I get rejected (RADIUS is the protocol used).

  In the reports of the CSA, I can see, it seems the following error "Impossible authentic - CS expired password.

  I activated the option 'Apply the password change rule' in group settings, other options for the 'password aging rules' are disabled.

  Thanks for your help,

  Francisco

  You can use GANYMEDE + to get the change of password to work.

  Does not work with the RADIUS.

• HFM Calc Manager of rules does not appear through excerpts-> elements of the application

  Dear team,

  We have management rules defined in application consolidation HFM EPMA but during extraction through the workspace using snippets-> Application parts, few of them make their appearance, but not all.

  That's why I wonder that all Manager cal rules are run in the context of Consolidation or not. Please provide steps to check whether or not all the rules of calc manager associated with the application.

  According to my understanding, Manager of calc rules should extract through the workspace using snippets-> elements of Application please confirm if my interpretation is correct or not.

  We are om EMP 11.1.2.3

  Your immediate response is much appreciated.

  Thank you

  Hello. Check in the Calc Manager that the desired rules are rule groups that are marked for deployment. If the rules are not in a set of rules, or rules in some rulesets not marked for deployment, then the rules will be not responsible for HFM.

  Kind regards

  Eric

• Global rules, does not the kickoff when calling service Web CHECKIN_NEW

  Hi all
  
  We are trying to call web services CHECKIN_NEW/CHECKIN_UNIVERSAL with the required fields like the doctype, securitygroup, primary file title etc...
  
  It works fine, but the global rules were not the kickoff.
  
  Ex: Say, we have a rule that says that Field_A is mandatory when SecurityGroup = Public.
  
  But when we are invoking the webservice with SecurityGroup = Public, content is to check-in even if we do not value Field_A.
  
  We need global rules to kick sending and we give the error/warning that there is missing field...
  
  Can you please let us know if we are missing something here, there or another way to get this requirement?
  
  Thanks in advance,
  
  See you soon,.
  V

  Funny... I created a global profile rule that triggers a RIDC for CHECKIN_NEW call (my rule checks for the existence of a value in the comments field), and the call to RIDC fails (as I expected) when I only provided no commentary and works when I provided a comment. If the rule engine is indeed fired.

  I think you must post your profile rule. More precisely, exactly how do you define your rule? I think you use the check box "use default value" for the field, which is incorrect for your use case. Also post the rule conditions of activation. They are also probably wrong for the case of the intended use.

  Please do not ask for examples of code until you post your profile in the rule details.

• Incident rule does not for model OEM 12 c of the Golden Gate (12.1.0.5 window)

  Hi gurus,

  I practice OEM 12 c, I created Incident the rule for the target database Type that works well.

  Today morning, I created model extracted and Manager, GoldenGate and applied on the GG target, after created Incident rule with properties below

  Targets: Oracle GoldenGate. Oracle GoldenGate extract; Oracle GoldenGate Manager

  Article: incoming events and events updates

  Type: Alert metric (selected option button: all events of type alert metric)

  
  

  Add Action: Condition: always perform the actions

  Notice: E-mail me
  

  But I do not have the mail, even I kill or stop the process of mgr/extract

  When I check in the ENTERPRISE > SURVEILLANCE > INCIDENT MANAGER

  I can see the target are down and event showing her stockings.

  If someone body worked on this case. Please help me solve this problem.

  Thanks and greetings

  Jamsher Khan

  Try to use the button simulate rules in the window Incident rules.  It will show you the actions for different types of measures/events.   One thing I see here could be that the target down, will not appear in the alert metric type, this is a category of its own called target availability

• Error messages for cross validation rules does not properly

  We have implemented two rules of cross validation for our table GL accounts flexfield combinations.  We had implemented the first rule, and it was working properly and displays the error message associated with the rule.  When we added a second rule with a different error message, the application correctly applied the rule, however, now when a new combination of COA violates the first rule, the error message that is displayed is the second rule we created.  How can we get the error messages to be displayed for the correct error?

  Matt

  Yes, if you say that when the 3 segment is actually "OPEX", then it seems to me that the Include and Exclude are simply reversed for what you describe as the needs of the company. When you make a rule, the simplest way to define this term is usually with a universal Include statement (that is to say, we want that all combinations of account), then from there to make a statement that says Yes all except these (the exclude statement).

  Aware in Opex Department will exercise a universal declaration currently, which means that all of these accounts are not allowed (again, except if 7-9 segments have something else of zeros, while they may be permitted).

  If your site back how intervals are defined between the Include and Exclude in the Department and Opex, once registered, you can see if this gives now what you are looking for. If segment 3 is supposed to have a range rather than the value "OPEX", then the exclusion may need further tweaking and we can discuss that further if you wish. With the way in which it will be set to this change, it will not allow a segment 2 to 00000 if the Segment 3 is "OPEX" during a new combination.

  Please mark answers 'Proper' or 'Useful', as appropriate, to facilitate solutions to the other participants of the RTO.

• Validation controls rule does not

  Hi guys,.
  
  I am trying to build my project and I get the following compile errors (popup)
  
  
  -Compatibility of the server rule
  -Public name Check
  
  
  Could someone please advise.
  
  Thank you

  Using the OPM, search for the topic "fix a build error. It is what explains that control in fact.

  It seems that you have not given your attributes of basic level and level superior public names. You can give them public names or disable version control.

• CSS border-radius rule does not work in IE9

  Hi all.

  I wonder if anyone has a CSS border-radius rule to work with release of RoboHelp's WebHelp/WebHelp Pro in IE9?

  I have tried to create a new, empty project and have used some simple built-in CSS (no external CSS is called), namely:

  < style type = "text/css" >

  div {}

  border-radius: 15px;

  background-color: #f00;

  }

  < / style >

  and then, in the <>body, all this:

  < div >

  < p > Hello world. < /p >

  < / div >

  The result is exactly as expected when viewed as Safari, Chrome and Firefox, but IE9 stubbornly refuses to display curved corners on the div. The same code works perfectly in IE9 when I write it in Dreamweaver.

  I thought that I might have met around the problem when I found a site which proposes to add the following code to the head of <>:

  < meta http-equiv = "X-UA-Compatible" content = "IE = 9" / >

  It seemed to work when previewing the theme with the "Show selected item" button (it looks like a pair of glasses), but when the WebHelp output has been generated, the rounded corners were still left in IE9. The same is true when the output with WebHelp Pro.
  So, is the process of release of RoboHelp do something to remove the application of the rule of border-radius in IE9? By specifying values individual border-radius for each side of the div did not help either.
  I use RoboHelp 9.0.1.232.

  Hello

  Just did a quick test and it's certainly a bug in IE9. It seems that when you use frameset, the top frame rendering mode is used for all of the images below. Given that the appearance of WebHelp file still use the game of HTML 4 frames, the IE9 rendering mode is on quicks mode or something.

  Solution: Add the meta tag for IE not only your topics, but all of the htm files mode in your output. Try my rendered IE script tags: http://www.wvanweelden.eu/robohelp/scripts/ierendertags. This will add tags to all htm files in your output. Voila, the boundary curves are now visible in IE9.

  A note: I have no idea what standard mode of IE will be at the table of the contents/index/search/etc. of the WebHelp. I don't know if IE9 is already supported by Adobe so be sure to test your WebHelp.

  Take a bow

  Willam

• Filters & rules does not not in Hotmail

  Why don't the filters or rules no longer work in Hotmail.

  I tried for weeks to sort my Inbox in my existing files and eventually do it manually, I wanted to avoid.

  Is there an upgrade or something that has happened and is causing this frustration?

  Hey Madmel4,

  For assistance with Windows Live Hotmail please join the Windows Live Solution Center experts. The forum following the link will take you directly to their Hotmail forums:
  Windows Live Solution Center - Hotmail

• Why this rule does not generate an alarm

  Hi all

  I created a rule to the alarm on a DB2 table that is reaching a limit on the number of pages.  If I run this code in the editor of "Condition run the query" for a limited scope object which is known to have a number of pages, it returns true.  However, I never get a generated alarm.  I wonder if I am missing something, or if there is some newspapers or other place that I can look to see if it runs into an error.  Thank you.

  Scope of the rule: DB2_Database_Table

  Condition:

  condition = false 

  pages = server.get("DataService").retrieveLatestValue(scope,"data_object_pages")?.getValue().sum 

  pct_full = (pages / 16776960 * 100).round(2) 

  //Only lookup tablespace type if percent is high

  if (pct_full > 75){

     tbsp = scope.parents[0].table_spaces[scope.tbsp_id]

     if (tbsp.tablespace_content_type == "ANY"){

       condition = true

     }

  }

  return condition;

  Another obvious to check, but what is the behavior of rule value?

  

  Also, have you tested the rule?  Add the following at the beginning of your state of health:

  Returns true;

  You may also change your rule of tripping to make it work:

  

  If all goes well, this will trigger an alarm for each instance of limited scope - a bit messy if you have many objects whose scope, although

  Brian