Mercury Playbak Engine and GTX 470?

Hey everybody,

I'm kinda a noob here, but I tried to optimize my experience with first CS5. I have an intel i7-950 @3. 07 GHz with 6 GB of RAM. I also have a GTX 470 1.25 GB of RAM. I'm a little angry at my slow rendering time. When rendering, my ram fills up to the maximum (planning for a bit more) and my cpu works in a mid to high level between the cores. I feel that my gpu should be a little more help with the load, and I wanted to activate the CUDA cores for the mercury playback engine. I have two questions, though. First of all, how much will this help me to make time? And second, allegedly after the hack I'm supposed to change the general framework of Mercury Playback Software only playback with the mercury GPU acceleration. However, I have not done the hack, but I already seem to have the selected GPU acceleration. Does this mean that my card is just used without CUDA? Just want some clarification. Thank you in advance,

M65

The GTX 470 is on the list of approved cards and so didn't need the hack to activate hardware MPE.

in_Adobe_Premiere_Pro_CS5_system_requirements http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/Policy-Pricing/System-Requirements-Premiere-Pro.html#ma

GLenn

Tags: Premiere

Similar Questions

  • MPE and GTX 470

    Hey guys, I just installed a GTX 470 and something is not quite right.
    I checked that the card is on the list of the compatible for the Mercury playback engine.
    When I playback of my NX5 the CPU goes to 100%, while the GPU is around 11%.

    Any advice?

    Processor Q6600, 8 GB of RAM, RAID 0, GTX 470 graphics card.

    Execution of drivers up to date to 10/23/10 on all devices.

    All Adobe updates have been installed from the aforementioned date as well.
    I've included a screenshot of my GPUSniffer results.
    I tried to run the Benchmark in CS5, but when it runs the .vbs file all that he did was a mistake.
    Thank you

    GPUSniffer Results.jpg

    John,

    Use of your CPU/GPU numbers are quite logical if you do not use a lot of transitions or effects supported MEP. You will see more use GPU if you apply more effects taken MEPS supported in your timeline. Decoding is only, CPU effects and transitions can be GPU assisted if they are noted as such.

    If you try the Référence PPBM5 , you will notice a much larger the GPU use, because it is filled with accelerated effects. However, you said that you had a problem with the script. Follow the instructions for a new try at the end of the Readme file carefully. Follow them to the letter. Even a slightly different approach can cause the script to fail.

  • Graphics card to enable the Mercury playback engine

    I work with first as part of the CS5 for a few years with good results but wants to speed up the Assembly.

    I tried to add my card to the list within Adobe programming to enable the mercury playback speed but no go.

    My card is ATI Radeon HD 5400.

    Y at - it someone could recommend to replace the Radeon which first would automatically use a card?

    The system is:

    Intel Core 2 Quad CPU Q 8200 @ 2.33 ghz

    4 GB of ram

    64-bit operating system

    Thanks much for the tips

    Norman

    Must be NVidia for CS5

    creation http://blogs.adobe.com/premiereprotraining/2011/02/CUDA-Mercury-playback-Engine-and-Adobe--pro.html

    If your nVidia card at least 1Gig of video ram, use the nVidia Hack http://forums.adobe.com/thread/629557 - which is a simple entry in a file "supported cards.

    For your computer, don't spend much, go to the Page Tweakers and find the article on a balanced system

  • GTX 460 vs GTX 470

    From what I can find on the ' net, there is no much difference between the GTX 460 and GTX 470 graphics cards.  But there is a price difference.  That I would be absent if I bought GTX 460 instead of the GTX 470?

    J. D.

    Nothing to really. Both perform excellently and PR, there is virtually no difference in performance. Your best bet is probably 2 GB GTX 460.

  • EVGA GTX 480 and Mercury playback engine

    I think that my first Pro CS 5.5 supports the GTX 480, BUT the Mercury playback engine is only the software.  Any ideas on how to get hardware acceleration work?  If it is not supported by Adobe is there a Hack to replace the software only.  Thanks for the help.

    Hello

    Make sure that you have the video card is entered correctly.  It should be GeForce GTX 480 is case-sensitive.

    Also, try to put it on the first line of the file cuda_supported_cards.txt.

    I assume that you are running Windows 7.  If you are, follow these steps:

    1. which Start in the lower left corner of Windows 7 icon.

    2. then click on all programs , and then click the Accessories folder.

    3. look in the Accessories folder for Notepad and RIGHT click on Notepad

    4 the left, click on run as administrator

    5. When Notepad opens, click on file , then Open

    6. go to the folder Program Adobe Adobe first Pro CS5.5

    7. find the file: cuda_supported_cards.txt then click on it to select the file, then click Open

    9. you will see a list of maps, add your video card to the list like this GeForce GTX 480

    10. click on file , then click Save.  Then quit Notepad.

    Now start first CS5.5 and you should be able to put it to GPU acceleration.

    Dave

  • With the help of NVIDIA GTX970, it will allow acceleration GPU rendering and playback instead of Mercury playback engine software only option?

    I want to buy GTX 970 NVIDIA,

    With the help of NVIDIA GTX970, it will allow acceleration GPU rendering and playback instead of Mercury playback engine software only option?

    Yes.

  • The Mercury Playback Engine GPU acceleration and activate mercury pass question

    So, I'm working on Windows 7 Professional 64 bit SP1 (my father built my desktop and here all the info I get off Speccy on its parts)

    -CPU: AMD Phenom II X 4 965

    Deneb 45nm technology

    -RAM: 8.00 twin DDR3 @ 669 MHz

    -Motherboard: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. CG1330 (AM3)

    -Graphics: VX2770 series j (1920x1080@60Hz)

    ATI Radeon HD 5700 Series (ASUSTeK Computer Inc.)

    -Hard drives: 932GB Seagate ST31000528AS peripheral ATA (SATA)

    -Optical discs: BD - RE of HL - DT - ST WH14Ns40


    Now, recently I'm subscribed to Adobe first CC 2015 and I open a project file that was originally a Mac computer (the disc has been formatted to be read by the PC and I got this done before so thing Mac PC should not be a problem)

    The first message, I thought "this project has been modified used with playback engine Mercury GPU acceleration (OPEN CL), which is not available or not certified on this system. Only Mercury playback engine software is used.

    I didn't know what to do with that I just said ok, just the project upward and running and everything is fine except the audio continues by cutting. He will play for about a minute on it before the audio starts to cut.

    I played a bit with my preferences and settings and preferences in reading, there is a setting that says "Enable mercury transmit." Thereby the option checked I get the audio cutting out (there are a few options with the audio device being Adobe DV or Adobe Desktop Audio sub and an option for the video device said Adobe DV and I can check or leave it disabled but results remain substantially the same.) Now I have it on Adobe audio, DV with Adobe DV checked and it goes a little long before audio cutting comes in)

    Now, if I uncheck Mercury Select pass he plays wise audio fine but after about a minute, playback stops. Literally paused, it is it's not freezing acts as I pressed pause when I touch my mouse or keyboard.

    I tried to do a new project and import all of the images in it to see if it would help, but the problem persists. My pictures comes from multiple sources, including a Sony DSLR and Iphones.

    Please tell me this is a fixable bug and Adobe CC is not incompatible with the office somehow.

    CineForm is a codec made specifically to be a "Digital Intermediate" or post-processing format. The company that created it was bought by the people of the GoPro and is used in some of their cameras. It is designed for the achievement of quality thanks to a multi-generation processing pipeline post, without loss of quality when a step is rendered on export to another station in the process.

    There were two objectives: one, it kept ALL quality through export operations repeated at a high-end professional examination and two that it was like 'light' on the processor of a computer while encoding off to play as possible. So it is not nearly as packed as many other codecs (like most H.264 & tel) and puts MUCH less strain on the CPU. It's usually large files, well that say not nearly as big as as DPX frames-based form. Does a little more direct work on the disc reading process to have been a bit bigger... but... This is a place you should have excess capacity in your system. We rarely have spare CPU capacity.

    To get it, you go to the website of the GoPro and download their free GoPro Studio, I think it is called and install. Who installs Cineform on your computer, and then you can transcode via the endoder that comes with PrPro, Adobe Media Encoder, which allows batch and same file transcoding and control things like a time for a process. Or you can do it via using Adobe prelude to ingest, rename and say: place the renamed files 'original' in a single folder permanent conservation while making another series of the same name but transcoded to X codec and laid in this case here to work with.

    Of course, you can use the (Mac) ProRes and DNxHD/R (PC) to work with, and in their larger versions, less compressed, they work just as well.

    All three codecs can be used for import in each program level pro, I know. PC cannot export ProRes that Apple will not allow the codec out of 'their' sandbox sand and DNxHD/R has been designed to work in Windows (although as ProRes, can be read / most of the Mac edition). CineForm works anyway.

    And as always in the work of pro, we deliver an export of output in that to the customer at the end of the job. If the original codec of the camera and the codec to work when editing... does not matter. Other than to be a step in the process.

    Neil

  • Playback engine Mercury CS5.5 and map of Cuda with After Effects

    Cuda card and the Mercury playback engine applies to the AE or only first delivery on their part.   I was really looking forward to faster and more long previews / makes in AE with purchase CS 5.5

    on a mac intel pro OS 10.6.8

    Thank you

    At this point only first Pro uses these features. However, this may change to the CS6. You never know...

    Mylenium

  • NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 470 PhysX years CS5

    Hello world

    A quick question...

    Fact Engine reading Mercury of Adobe CS5 only works with NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 470 CUDA™ or it can also work with NVIDIA® GeForce® GTX 470 PhysX®?

    PS please tell me it works very well with both!

    Thanx


    PhysX and 3D stereovision, aspects of many cards nVidia, generally available in console driver setting and are used in gamining and possibly in 3D applications. Going back a few years and also versions of Adobe programs, nVidia has chosen to have these two WE by default with the installation of several drivers. These functions caused problems with several Adobe programs, and the "fix" was to go to the console and turn them off the COAST, when you work with these programs Adobe. They could then be turned back ON, when you've been playing, or by using a 3D application. After about 2 versions of the nVidia drivers, the company has decided to assign the default OFF, but they can still be turned on, when required.

    I would leave PhysX and 3D stereovision (name of it might have changed?) OFF, when you work with Adobe programs, but it never hurts to test.

    Good luck

    Hunt

  • Active not material Mercury playback engine

    I am a novice first pro CS5 user (Beginner) and bought the next video card:

    MSI N470GTX Twin Frozr II NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 (Fermi) 1280 MB 320 - bit GDDR5.  The 470 is on the compatibility list.

    When I opened the Premier and go on:

    'project' / 'settings of the project' / 'general' - and go to the bottom of the menu, the selection for the equipment / engine software mercury playback engine is grayed out, and it is in the mode of selection of software.  I can't use the drop down menu to change equipment.  I've updated my NVIDIA driver directly tonight too and that did not help.  Is there something I need to add (software) or something I need to change to make it work?  I read a post where they said I needed to load the CUDA SDK to work (from NVIDIA).  I forget something basic here to make this work?

    Thanks in advance...

    That should fix it. Read here: Premiere Pro CS5 (5.0.2) update: bug fixes and support CUDA "Premiere Pro workspace .

    Premiere Pro CS5 (5.0.2) for Windows also supports the following graphics cards speed up using CUDA on GPU technology: GTX 470, Quadro 4000 and Quadro 5000.

    Yes, it's for 5.0.2 but which is included in 5.0.3 (current) as well. Your card is "official." just need to the appropriate platform.

  • Reading software now Mercury only engine

    Just do updates of Adobe, and Prime Minister will now use Mercury Playback Engine Software only - he has already used the hardware acceleration. Years and until today, I used a slightly modified "cuda_supported_cards.txt, adding my card to the list: 'GeForce GTX 260'."  That has always worked, and I have not yet looked for this txt file recently. Now I discover that there is no file is no more, and with this upgrade of playback engine Mercury is only linked software now.

    It is a machine Windows, NVidia GeForce GTX 260. Under display, I tried to update and received a message that it is to this day (did not go on the site of). I can't find any settings change, but I'm not very familiar with these cards.

    How can I resume physical capacity.

    Thank you very much

    KDOC

    KDOC salvation,

    Premiere Pro 2015.3 can work with maps video designed on a newer architecture.

    We seem to be issues that Premiere Pro is not able to detect the old cards.

    I suggest you to roll back the video driver but still cannot guarantee that it will work with Premiere Pro 2015.3

    If you want you can restore the previous version of Premiere pro:

    https://forums.Adobe.com/thread/2170895

    Thank you

    Ilyes Singh

  • CUDA Mercury playback engine in Premiere Pro CS6 but not show in first Pro CC. Why is this?

    G ' Day of the Australia again.

    I've been using Premiere Pro CS6, and during this time the Mercury Playback Engine GPU acceleration of the reduction (CUDA) appears as an option for the rendering engine.

    But now that I've updated for first Pro CC, the rendering engine does not appear, only the Mercury Playback Engine software.

    My computer is

    Windows 7 Professional

    Service Pack 1

    Processor Intel R COre TMi7

    24 GB RAM

    64-bit operating system

    Graphics card

    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570

    Could someone help me please get the CUDA converter to appear with first Pro CC.

    Thanks a lot for your help.

    The following text appears when I run the Premiere Pro Cs6

    CUDA.jpg

    Adobe switched to a DLL that universally supports all GPU 'qualified '.  You upgrade the drivers for that?

  • Mercury Playback Engine GPU is not available

    I have read through the forum messages and have not found a solution, so I apologize if there is only a solution posted elsewhere.

    I have an iMac 27 "(fin 2012) with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX running Mac OS graphics card 10.8.5."

    I use Adobe first Pro CS6.0.3, and when I upgraded my OS to 10.9 Maverick, I started to experience several problems, including:

    1. The dreaded spinning beachball and "first meets not.»
    2. "This project has been modified used with Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration (CUDA) which is not available on your system. Mercury Playback Engine Software only will be used.
    3. Video files - I think they were all. MOV - became "crushed" to the top of the program screen (film picked up only about 1/3 of the window the program monitor).

    After a long conversation with the Support from Adobe, it stated that the update to 10.9 Maverick was the problem, then i:

    1. Updated for first 6.0.5 but who has not fixed any issues.
    2. Logged in as 'Root', who worked for a while but I got 3 'first encountered problem and must close.'
    3. Remove preferences, repaired permissions, database troubleshooting practices, etc., but problems persist.

    No help.

    Finally I restored my computer from a Time Machine backup to a day before the OS 10.9 update and this seemed to resolve all issues. So I was for Mac 10.8.5 and first 6.0.3.

    But the. MOV-compressed-in-the-program-monitor problem began to surface again (see photo below).

    Screen Shot 2013-11-04 at 4.34.04 PM.png

    So I updated for first to 6.0.5 (but not my OS - it is still 10.8.5), and the "Mercury playback engine" error is returned.

    Screen Shot 2013-11-04 at 2.58.47 PM.png

    And the. MOV files are always compressed in the program monitor. I have a project that I finished in 6.0.3 but is now messed up in 6.0.5.

    Help please. Is the only solution without downgrading to first 6.0.3 and if so, should I do a clean install of the program of the DVD?

    Thank you

    RW Harris, Director of training

    Express oil change & tire engineers

    Birmingham, AL

    NVidia Windows Hack http://forums.adobe.com/thread/629557 - which is a simple entry in a file 'supported cards' - and Mac http://www.vidmuze.com/how-to-enable-gpu-cuda-in-adobe-cs6-for-mac/

  • When the latest EVGA video card will be approved for Mercury Playback Engine GPU acceleration?

    I built my system of video editing, Windows 7 Ultimate, EVGA GeForce GTX 570 graphics card and motherboard ASUS Rampage III Extreme i7 920 Mhz, 24 GB of RAM. I decided to update my video card for EVGA 660Ti with many more CUDA processors and 3 GB of memory, but when I made the video I got this message "the project last used with Mercury Playback Engine acceleration GPU, which is not available on this system." Software playback engine Mercury only will be used. "and it seemed that the rendering is slower. Even if the newer video cards EVGA have more memory and processor and power more CUDA cores and best score on Intex experience Windows, Adobe does not approve them and say that they use the GPU Merecury Playback Engine acceleration. Why? Quadro cards are much more expensive have less memory, less CUDA cores but are rated higher by Adobe for creating and rendering, why is - this? What gives? Why EVGA which seem more powerful and cheaper cards rated lower than cards Quadro? This will never change?

    These cards just have not been tested yet, is all.  But if you go in the program of the PP folder and just delete the cuda_supported_cards.txt file, you should be good.

  • Mercury playback engine

    Hello, I just bought first Pro CS 6 and the Mercury playback engine does not work. I also first pro CS 5 and the Mercury playback engine works perfectly. I have a Nvidia GTX 285 graphics card. How to operate also in Version CS6 first pro?

    The standard answer n ° 1: update your graphics driver.

    Mylenium

Maybe you are looking for