Migrando vSphere 5.0 5.5 para servidores also e

Similar Questions

• Sears para servidor esx 4.1

  Hola,

  Fornuis desde version 3.5 to version 4.1 después las back su con Vmware vCenter as tenemos ahora used granjas me is fornuis back hosts independientes Quebec we have in the DMZ, para ello voy a fornuis has 4.1 con el script addition según el Ko 1009440, una vez en 4.1 tengo parchear has the ultima release como estan los ESX las granjas are, are para ello llevo usar el comando esxupdate idea. The duda tengo in los bundles than as descargar tengo para ello. Yo quiero parchear has the ultima release, the 988178 y me he descargado el zip used pero... ¿me basta con este o tengo than descargarme e instalar todos los beams desde liberation than tender after upgrade be the 260247're decir, 4.1 original?

  Gracias photos,.

  Kind regards

  Hola

  A mi sale me esta version (porque're lo as licenciado tengo) y he probado than reconoce UN 3.5

  https://my.VMware.com/Web/VMware/details?downloadGroup=VSP510-VCLI-510&ProductID=285

  Hay UN video del Ko than dice como hacerlo, pero tambien as need pasar primero el esxupgrade para hacerlo correctamente, por lo esto're a poco Complementatrio

  http://www.YouTube.com/watch?v=PudPMGJmmdg

  Need montar, in una Máquina (vale of you UN portatil) con acceso a SC Red of you solo dmz, a Web server, ftp o, o a nfs share.

  Cuanto a lo del espacio, porque a lo mejor need ampliar el/var o algo en el particiones scheme change, are me suena than esx 3 era of 10 particiones en y en of of esx 4 don't solo 5, but if no you ha don't dado problemas antes, ahora no nada pasar should.

  Me comenta otro compañero as el kb of plots are http://kb.vmware.com/kb/1022140 y el del scrip are http://kb.vmware.com/kb/1009440 (este're con el as andabas)

• Consulta mejor opcion para configurar networking "virtual Switch".

  Hola todos espero esten very well...

  Tengo una consulta tengo q instalar 4 ESXI vphere 4.5 en mi granja servidores para el cual tengo q hacer ESXI a cluster are q el material nuevo are muy diferente al los servidores ago instalados.

  Tengo una consulta con respecto a part of networking

  nosotros tenemos currently assigned a con x amount of vmnic virtual switch a virtual swicht este para los servidores in una vlan especifica

  Office of y tambien tenemos otro con virtual switch x amount of vmnic para our Máquinas, o sea maquinas office q usan como desktop users con otro vlan especifica

  hace poco lei q best practices keep comunicación en esta era una en UN virtual switch solo?

  Partamos respond as las best no son solo eso practices, good practices there no estan en piedra, por cada uno debe set so what requested una best practice in particular to asil o has nuestro stage o an our needs.

  Dejando en esto claro, you have several options, partiendo por the config as you currently have there than in any caso esta mala.

  Según lo than tiendo tienes 2 vSwitch, uno para servidores office y otro para escritorios office, con cada vSwitch a number x of physical NICS.  Esta config you permite urban el trafico ambos types for office, asegurando además cierto nivel redundancia the conexion en Máquinas.

  Otra opcion, works that you are using VLAN, you have a vSwitch solo con todas las NIC that usan los 2 vSwitch configurados currently.  In unico vSwitch puedes crear este 2 exchanges, cada uno con una VLAN para urban el trafico las maquinas office, para lo cual las NIC physical deben estar his in modo los fisicos, pasando both switches trunk VLAN.  Esta config you permite una mayor red redundancia marine y ancho Mayor of banda, use todas las are for VLAN cada that could cards available for en el vSwitch network.

  Both options igual son of validas y lo you depende Niños y como are the Red architecture of you plataforma.

  Saludos!

• lspci to detect i350t2 but not the vsphere

  I followed to adapters Intel®, VMware ESXi Server * driver and NVM Image compatibility information and chose only the version of the driver. It is installed successfully. Esxi is now while I'm cli and type:

  ~ # lspci | grep network

  0000:09:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection [vmnic2]

  0000:09:00.1 Network controller: Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection [vmnic3]

  0000:0f:04.0 network controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5715 [vmnic0] Gigabit Ethernet

  0000:0f:04.1 network controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5715 [vmnic1] Gigabit Ethernet

  It's ok, but then

  ~ # esxcfg - NICS - l

  Name PCI Driver link speed Duplex MAC address MTU Description

  vmnic0 0000:0f:04.00 tg3 up to 1000Mbps Full 00:19:99:0 has: 34:2 has 1500 Gigabit Ethernet Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5715

  vmnic1 0000:0f:04.01 tg3 Down 0Mbps has a half 00:19:99:0: 34:2 b 1500 Gigabit Ethernet Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5715

  It is also missing in vsphere client = > network cards. This is also only Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet BCM5715. How to initialize completely I350t2? What is the problem?

  Strange, the so-called vmkernel detected and claimed the devices, by assigning them to vmnic2 and vmnic3 (see the "VMkernel name" in the detailed output of material), which means that the driver should be ok.

  You can run these commands? :

  # ethtool-i vmnic2

  # esxcli network nic get - nic - name vmnic2

  # grep-i /etc/vmware/esx.conf vmnic

  module system esxcli # get - module igb

  # esxcfg - module - retrieves the igb options

  # enum_instances VMware_EthernetPort root/cimv2

  You don't have a pass through vmdirectpath active on a virtual machine with these cards, right?

  Someone in a similar thread said that he was working for them after an update of the firmware of the NETWORK adapter, have you tried? : Re: Intel I350-T4 only recognized by Esx 5.5, not by 5.5 U2

  Download Intel® Ethernet Boot Utility connections, images PXE and EFI drivers

  If all else fails, so at this time I can only imagine that maybe there is some BIOS or NIC configuration server BIOS interfering here. In general, this could be a parameter associated with interrupt handling. Update the server BIOS can help too.

  Have you tried another host or move the NETWORK card to a different physical PCI slot? Also, you might consider upgrading to 5.5 U3 independently to know if this will fix the problem.

• vSphere Essentials Plus to level 4.1 to 5.5

  Hi all

  I begin the process of upgrading a 4.1 Essentials in addition to 5.5, also essential Plus.

  My question is not directly related to the issue of upgrading, but rather ask some advice from a more experienced user. I'll try to explain my problem.

  Our current data center consists of three physical servers each with, among other material:

  -2 physical CPU

  -32 GB OF RAM

  -6 GB/s NIC

  We also have two switches to provide redundancy of the network between the host computers

  The current network layout, as far as the ESX hosts are concerned, do not reside on the implementation of VLAN. He is the current approach of the network by the hosts:

  -Each two NIC are grouped into 3 groups NIC

  -Each group NIC is connected to two switches, for purposes of availability

  -There are basically 3 different physical networks

  The problem with the current provision is that almost all communications are limited to 1 Gbps.

  Another problem is the issue of scalability not having a VLAN.

  I take this window of upgrade, not only for vSphere upgrade to version 5.5, but also to try to improve the scalability and performance of the network.

  One of the main goals is to get more than 1 Gbps on communications. Now, this is my way of thinking on this:

  -J' I will consolidate the network cards in a group of 4 network cards and another of 2 NETWORK cards. This will give me a total of 2 Gbps on the network management and 4 Gbps on the other networks. QoS can be applied, giving different layouts, but I'm just trying to keep things simple for you (the reader)

  As far as I know there may be several approaches:

  (1) use of Cisco Nexus 1000v: as far as I know, this isn't an option, because it requires the Enterprise Plus version, which is not an option ;(

  (2) creation of LACP aggregation not between multiple network cards and two switches: switches HP 2510, which do not support inter trunking switch so it can be done.

  So, I find myself with a few, in my perspective two poor approaches:

  (3) create two standard vSwitch, subgroups of the Group of four of the NETWORK card into two groups of two network cards and connecting each vSwitch to a different physical switch. The issue of availability should be ensured on each of the virtual machines that contain two vNIC, one tied to each vSwitch. That would get me a rate of 2 Gbps.

  (4) I use single vSwitch for all 4 cards but, connect it to a single physical switch. I then configure the second switch as a watch only pass with the same configuration as the asset. This would require manual intervention in the case of the failure of the active switch, which would be very unpleasant.

  This is the help that I need. Is that all that I'm missing? Is there anything else I can do to try to take advantage of our current infrastructure?

  If you have done this far, thank you for your patience .

  Thank you all,

  Rui Santos

  From a design point of view, one key rule is to keep it as simple as possible. You don't want to introduce the complexity of your environment. I guess it's only a small environment (the license you have and the number of networks, not not using virtual LANs). 1 GB network is already saturated? My approach to this is to identify where the bottleneck can be. Majority of the number with vSphere performance is in stock, not in the network. If you are really worried about the scalability of the network, the simplest approach for me is to enable a VLAN and allow circuits. You can then combine the 4 NICs in a vSwitch and let (route in port ID function) default load balancing policy do its thing.

  Just my 2 cents...

• VI3 esx 3.5 license will work after upgrding to vsphere

  Hi I m with infrastructure vi3 esx 3.5 update 4.  and I have the license for 50 cpu. now, I want to upgrade to vsphere 4.0. now please tell me if I'm updating thease to vsphere 4.0 then will require work to license all or we new license file.  because vsphere work on esx license keys.and also what about vc 2.5 to vcenter 4.0 license.

  Go to VMware.com, select Connect.

  Destination-> manage product licenses

  Product-> VMware vSphere 4

  Come on!

  Check to ensure that your Infrastructure 3 licenses have been upgraded, if so, use the product keys listed under your account.  If this is not the case, check with your dealer or vmware support.

  Once you have vCenter and an upgraded to vSphere ESX host 4, you should have the possibility to use the fault tolerance as long as you meet all the conditions.

• Licença ESXI

  BOM dia colegas,.

  I have a question.

  Com a licença ESXI EU poderia virtualizar but 1 physical server?

  Minha ideia e more 2 Servidores over com 2 servidores tolls cada.

  Desde ja Agradea§o a bonitos,.

  Marcello,

  A licença devera ser cadastrada no seu servidor fisico wave você instalou o ESXi of acordo com o licenciamento/processadores nro. ISSO basta!

  E insensitive to voce tera 10 para servidores tolls or 50 nao ha restricao o maquinas tolls related ao licenciamento nro.

  segue um comparativo licença. http://www.VMware.com/products/vSphere/buy/editions_comparison.html

  Atirbua pontos is a faith util resposta.

• Material minimo o como "sonar" con instalar ESXi 4.0 ESX 4.0 en o a PC...

  Hola,

  Alguien to ha sown not con the situation of querer vSphere test pero no material of UN disponer "como Dios Manda?"   (todos los servidores estan occupied y en con production ESX 3.5update3... y sin vistas a actualizarse a Vsphere...)

  Se that can reach a "instalar" ESX VMWare Workstation dentro o VMWare Server ( http://xtravirt.com/ http://xtravirt.com/xd10072 ) pero the idea o el objetivo are coming has a PC of montar con el material minimum necessary (CPU x 64, a 2 GB of RAM mimino, nightclubs, SATA, SAS, SCSI,...)

  ES posible? Alguien lo ha hecho y sabe exactamente material minimum necessary hay than tener para montar o ESXi ESX 4.0?

  The tests las estoy realizando con an Acer PC Veriton M410 ADM64, 3 GB of RAM, 200 GB SATA HD, Ethernet 10/100/1000 y al lanzar the instalacion of ESXi 4.0 llega a momento that appears el siguiente error:

  -Cannot load the tmp

  -Failed to load lvmdriver

  Gracias.

  Gracias.

  Buenas tardes Krax,

  El siguiente enlace can serte utility are only covers muy detalladamente the instalacion of vSphere 4 tanto como Workstation molten. Also el tema of the stupid red card las easy incursions can reach has hacer funcionar. http://punchingclouds.com/?p=779. El of He present arrancar ESX con 768 MB of RAM tal y como is comenta en information del enlace.

  Ojo, hay par UN of errata, the street vmx seria en Sección segunda:

  Monitor.virtual_exec = "hardware".

  Monitor.virtual_mmu = "hardware".

  Monitor.Control.enable_svm = 'true '.

  Monitor.Control.restrict_backdoor = 'true '.

  VMX.allownested = true '.

  Al hacer copy & paste las dobles comillas you pueden dar algun disgustillo... Pero works fairly well.

  Espero sea of utility.

  Kind regards

  Alejandro.

• Licenses 5 hypervisor

  Licenses 5 hypervisor

  Tiendo Québec fired her USO del hypervisor 5're para servidores hasta back microprocesadores sin Core limit there's 32 GB of RAM

  MI pregunta are: TR instalo hypervisor in a con servidor 5 4 processors o than 32 GB of RAM are as sucede lo? Administratar sabe El hypervisor 5 solo los recursos para los than has to license o esto can cause algun problema Técnico.

  Gracias

  Bernardo

  No have any problema Técnico, simplemente no podras provisionar mas maquinas por encima of the memory of 32 GB.

  LTC

• Mercado Virtualizadores - Hyper-V e RedHat

  Uma opinião Gostaria sober outros virtualizadores ambiente, como Hyper-V e RedHat

  Of na truth gostaria do saber qual e o segundo but aceito no mercado, occupied em devoted:

  -Estabilidade do Virtualizador.
  -Funcionalidades
  -Preco x benefício
  -Aceitacao no Mercado (pequeña / e Media large empresas).

  
  Alguem tem if Anthony empresas than use, eles nou3man o?

  Obrigado.

  Segundo while Mauro da propria vmware.

  Segue cross da are das empresas para servidores virtualizacao:

  1 - Vmware

  2 - Microsoft

  3 - Xen

  4 - Outros

  Na parte of virtualizacao office:

  1 - Xen

  2 - Vmware

  3 - Microsoft

  ESSA Informação faith me glance em uma palestra da propria Vmware

  Saulo Quinteiro Dos Santos

  Sistemas associate

  MPS Informatica Curitiba

  Bacharel em Ciência da computing - UFPR

  MSN: [email protected]<>[email protected]>

  Cel: 41-9927-5236

  4/27/2011 MauroBonder [email protected]<>[email protected]>

  Http://communities.vmware.com/index.jspaVMware communities >

  Mercado Virtualizadores - Hyper-V e RedHat

  created by MauroBonderhttp://communities.vmware.com/people/MauroBonder> in Brazil VMware User Group - see the discussion complete onhttp://communities.vmware.com/message/1744031#1744031

• Limitacao of LUNS not ESX 3.5?

  Good afternoon,

  Alguem aqui ja ouviu speak as a nao aconselha one of com but 1 TB LUN Criação Vmware? I have a client that comprou um Equalogic Dell com but of 6 TB of Espaço, o client possui 04 para servidores Vmware ESX 3.5, ele quer criar uma 2 TB LUN than estes servidores is conectem nesta LUN e assim no client o futuro possa ativar a funcionalidade HA Vmotion, no momento ele nao tem vCenter Server para isso com.

  Só Qué, um especialista da Dell infrormou that one of corn nao aconselha criar LUN com 1 TB, mas o Vmware client não soube me explain qual a Razão pelo especialista informed da Dell, o mesmo aconselha client o scream 4 LUNS of 500 GB com todos os servidores enxergando estas LUNS, ao investment of uma so 1 TB...

  Alguem sabe say that desta as por aqui da Dell? Any Limitacao are no Vmware than impeca an order of large LUN?

  Valeu a todos.

  Ivanildo Galvão

  Technology consultant

  Microsoft: MCP - MCT - MCSA

  VMware: VSP

  http://www.ivanildogalvao.com.br

  Twitter: @ivanildogalvao

  na truth an e ate 2 TB size limitacao, very da problems of performance, imagina 1 TB saindo por uma controller only LUN e tendo requisicao 100 Máquinas e tolls etc... complicated doesn't...

  o aconselhavel e as LUN na media 500 GB cabe use Oum number Máquina virtual historic e nao da gargalo... a recomendacao e Justice nisso... para nao causa gargalho asked no storage...

  Da uma take nessa forum tem LUN com maiores details...

  only the uma coisa, usually e o manufacturer do vai recomenda use LUN com size specific storage is necessario. Voce pode procurar no google any documentacao manufacturer storage (EX. DS8100 with VMware)...

  http://communities.VMware.com/thread/104211

  QQ coisa em relaçao a doubt of tamho UM datastore ve aqui--> http://www.vmware.com/pdf/vi3_35/esx_3/r35/vi3_35_25_config_max.pdf maximo

  1 unit number logic pode ter 2 TB, mas você pode ter EXTEND´s lun... (EU NAO SVETILA)...

  ABCs

• ESXi - Espelhamento em Doi servers fisicos. E possible?

  Boa noite.

  Client UM para criar um ambiente para servidores 5 linux virtual (simple Servidores, hoje rodam em 5 desktop computers P3-500 com 128 RAM e todos em recurso sobra!).

  BOM, virtualizar e facil, o ele me doctor, EU nunca fiz.

  ELE quer usar servidores fisicos, totally iguais Doi e caso um servidor fisico falhe between o outro automatically. Como todos os servidores linux virtualizar virei e usar o ESXi, gostaria of sabre: possible criar redundancia/espelhamento or balanceamento direto E no ESXi? ELA vai replicar todas as Máquinas tolls automatically?

  Para ter 7 servidores tolls (5 of processo e homologacao 2), todos bem surveys, 256 MB of memory, disco of 60 ~ 120 GB, o me recomendam material?

  Penso em um Quad-core, 2.3 Ghz, 8 GB of MP, 500 GB SAS 15 k, rede 1 GB between servidores direto para 1 GB to switch e. Aguenta? E muito, posso recomendable hw but simple e economico?

  Muito obrigado,

  Igor

  SIM, e possible, mas um compartilhado storage, como requisito primeiro voce precisa ter para Solução essa. Are o HA, mas com o HA nao seria espelhamento, seria uma redundancia no qual is o host falha ele liga a Máquina virtual em outro servidor Fisico.

  UMA Solução EU daria para voce e use a tecnologia of FT (Fault Tolerance), very precisa checkar a feature back processadores compatibilidade para essa, e also precisa uma rede estavel e uma rede dedicated placa para o FT como pratica boa para fazer esses espelhamento.

  Da uma look no manual para ter details: http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/resources/ft_virtualization_wp.pdf

  Outro artigo bem specific para a tecnologia e o seguinte: http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1013428

  A compatibilidade processador voce verificar em http://www.vmware.com/resources/compatibility/search.php?hl=pt-BR&sourceid=gd&rlz=1Q1GGLD_pt-BRBR358BR359 you can

  Espero ter helped.

  If you have found this information useful, please consider awarding points to 'Correct' or 'Useful'*.

• MAS of paths of y...

  Hola

  that type of "track selection" haceis vosotros usually, o mejor, cual recomendais?

  

  cutting en como este y me pasa algo raro (no target El appears) pero el caso are works, sabeis one what can deber?

  Gracias.

  VCP 410

  Hola Jose,

  Tal como muy well say los compañeros aside to have some sober knowledge Tecnología iscsi, in concreto in el tema Multipathing, recomendable conocer como lo understand y vmware asi como el manufacturer regardless of you cabina SAN (the caso you dell en)

  ASI than diria como aquel, vamos por partes

  Primero're muy recomendado the arrows a look has the vmware for the iscsi san configuration guide .

  Tampoco you olvides verificar if you launched soportada VMware poresta cabina. Not estarlo (tranquilo as lo esta) nadie you Zapatero than none you can carry una "sorpresa"... (me lo mid cuenten con una EMC AX150i Vsphere en...)

  Finalmente're también muy recomendable that indagues / averigues of her part of the manufacturer of the telephone box, that dan information/manuals/recommandations en the integration con vSphere. Ago that conociendo a poco las caracteristicas of you cabina (TR for example are activa / activa o activa / pasiva) you can reach get UN Mayor provecho a y integrarla mejor con vSphere.

  Te paso par UN documents as explican como programming you good cabina con vShpere:

  http://www.Dell.com/downloads/global/solutions/md3000i_esx_deploy_guide.PDF

  http://www.delltechcenter.com/page/VMware ESX4.0andPowerVault MD3000i

  In concreto're interesante el tutorial as explica como montar cabina using el path selection plugin (PSP) en modo round robbin.

  Ago por ultimo, you paso unos enlaces sober el tema del iscsi multipathing (consulta también el're para Vi3, no tiene desperdicio) Québec básicamente encuentro practice in este tema (enlaces sobretodo los back first):

  http://virtualgeek.typepad.com/virtual_geek/2009/01/a-multivendor-post-to-help-our-mutual-iSCSI-customers-using-VMware.html

  http://virtualgeek.typepad.com/virtual_geek/2009/09/a-multivendor-post-on-using-iSCSI-with-VMware-vSphere.html

  http://blogs.VMware.com/storage/2009/10/vStorage-multi-paths-options-in-vSphere.html

  (Creo tienes para a lectura entretenida largo rato)

  Respecto did you pregunta, el Método path selection depends on UN poco in cada caso mejor. Sobretodo viene determínado por las caracteristicas of the cabina y como is integrated quiera con vSphere. El mas 'conservador"por asi decirlo (y el is replaced by vmware Recomiendan if revisas the compatibility web guides VMware para you cabina) is the MRU. Este works well in 99.99999% of las situations. El fixed one administration del anterior, pero as segun como can give algun problemilla con segun than cabina (por esas cosillas del way screw up). A level of performance theory as must the mejor opcion sea configurar el path/caminos como round robbinlos load balancing .

  Por cierto. If revisas el tutorial mas arriba del delltechcenter you can see what the "particularidad" a veces no salga cadena of text from los target también pasa al autor. Parece ser than any hay as preocuparse por ese tema

  Bueno espero acercado reason en algo, Jose

  Best wishes / Saludos.
  Pablo

  Please consider awarding

  all useful or correct answer. Thank you!! -

  Por favor considered premiar

  any respuesta correcta o util. ¡¡MUCHAS gracias!

  Virtually noob blog

• Dudan con SQL Server 2005 Express Edition

  That tal, estoy planeando una instalacion vCenter, how many maquinas office can soportar sin problema el SQL Server 2005 express edition incluido in the instalacion? Esto para saber if dejo este o mejor instalo SQL Server 2005 Enterprise, pensando a futuro en cuanto can crecer infrastructure.

  Buenas

  Express no esta en entornos production practice. Esta limitada has 3 GB of ram, 4 GB of DB y UN unico del micro core.

  Perfectly validated para mind in una VM BBDD para servidor haga you're VC (pero not you aconsejo Quebec sea el mismo) y otra para update manager if you want to.

  In total there speaks esto al extremo con 4 esxi y cabina iscsi y el restaurant por virtual, en 35 MV ago begins ser y lento con 45're intratable

  If esta u otra respuesta're util, por favor su marca used notificador.

  Gracias / looks

• USO of memoria Máquina virtual Windows Server 2003 R2 STD

  Hola dear grupo,

  Queria hacerles una consulta no dado than no entiendo como memoria RAM asigna a las maquinas Office ESXi 4.0. 2 detallo docking 1 del ESXI donde indica el uso en el host memoria y otra el administrator of tasks of Windows where indicates that tiene mas memoria RAM Escalin Québec esta using in el ESXi host.

  How this can be?

  Desde el tiempo por leer mi message thank is.

  A gran Saludo!

  Martin Morana

  Hola MMorana

  ES debido has the technology of VMware, llamada overcommitment, decir, you server ESX overcommited, lo cual esta are no bueno, desde el punto performance vista, pero esta tecnologia hace as el ratio of page para servidores ESX sea Mayor in otras soluciones Virtualizacion.

  Saludos,

  Jose Maria Gonzalez,

  Founder and president of JmGVirtualConsulting.com

  -