Consulta mejor opcion para configurar networking "virtual Switch".

Similar Questions

• Segments of network & virtual switches

  Hello. I have a question on the Association of the physical NIC ports to a virtual switch.                                                                                I have two network segments. The first has a group of VLAN ID. The second has a network isolated from the VLAN ID to evoke. Can I combine the physical NETWORK adapter ports that are connected by physical switches on the two network segments, on the same virtual switch defined in VMware ESX 3.5 / vSphere? I guess I'd better associate the two network segments with two virtual switches, but I'd like to hear from you.

  Thanks in advance for your help

  If you cannot physically route between the two segments then you can create exchanges on a vswitch and have dedicated NICs for each group of ports and plug the network adapters in the relevant physical switches that connect to network segments or if total isolation is necessary, then create a separate vswitch and do the same thing...

• Fully automated DRS cual're mejor opcion para trabjar con vdi

  Hola todos,

  Tengo una duda sober opcion cual en DRS fully automatic

  Tengo mas of 150 office maquinas y varios servidorres dentro del esxi host quisiera balancear carga lo mejor q can sin anti el performance of the machine.

  entonces don't be TR leave has half a ponerlo UN mas agresive UN 75% not so is a UN 75% will a comenzar a maquinas por cambio cuando realmente o any mover you need pasarse otro countless

  OPCION cual me be replaced by Recomiendan are in mi tengo mas of 150 escritorios ambiente y virtualizados no quiesiera anti el performance of las vdi

  Saludos,

  If no you puedes enabling urban en no clusters, lo mejor usar pools are (fijar base del reparto en una amount para cada uno y mas al cluster tire what if needed, pero con lo as tiene el otro reserved)

  Lo said a level of vdi. Users con 150, have al menos el repartido total en varios pools por temas performance

• DNS will work within a private network that includes only a virtual switch?

  I have a private network defined in free ESXi 5.5 using only one virtual switch.

  Virtual machines on this virtual switch can ssh them using their IP addresses.

  I have configured the DNS on one of the virtual machines in this private network, but it will not

  resolve hostnames to IP addresses.

  Simple question, DNS can run on a private network that is composed

  only a switch virtual ESXi?

  Yes it will work, but you first need to register all the names of virtual machines and the IP address on the DNS server and point the entry of DNS server on the virtual machines to IP address of the DNS server that you deployed.

• Virtual network and switch Option grayed out?

  I have two hosts on my environment, clustered. Web client (using Vsphere 5.5), I choose a host-> manage-> virtual switches, but all the options are greyed out (add host network, refresh the network hosts, manage physical network cards, etc.). I go to another host and choose the same thing, and these options are available. I don't know why this is happening? I have googled around, but can't find anything useful.

  You can do it in vSphere Client Host? Sometimes the Web client takes forever to load the icons change to the virtual switches.

  Maybe you should give the vCenter, a little more RAM and the Java process Web client as well.

  See a good explanation on how to increase Java memory for customer Web here: Improve vSphere Web Client Performance. Tom Fojta & #039; s Blog

• Network management - only the virtual switch

  I installed latest ESXi 4 Update 1, which is available. I m running Active Directory LAB on several virtual servers Windows 2008 R2 and one of them acts as a router with RRAS role. I m creating 3 different subnets and one of them must be only virtual - no material connection NIC in the interface of ESXi´s it seems that I can't do this, while creating the new switch virtual it forces me to select NIC it becomes a problem, because if I use a virtual switch for Windows 2008 router has the physical NETWORK map It will come to mean that the cable is disconnected. And I need a virtual connection between virtual servers only, that they will be the single subnet between them and communication to physical clients will go through this router´s of Windows 2008 NIC that is not supposed to be physical.

  How can I archive with ESXi?

  You can create a vSwitch without attached Teddy.

  Do not select any NIC, or delete them after the creation of the vSwitch.

  André

• Advice on how best to configure the network adapters and virtual switch in ESX host

  I'm new to VMware and am its implementation.  I got my training a few weeks ago, and now I'm configing my hosts.  I have 3 guests, each have 2 network cards.  There is a virtual switch that ESX creates when it is installed (vSwtich0).  The books said that it is advisable to delete the VM network port of virtual machine that is assigned to the value group default virtual switch and put it on another virtual switch so that you keep your management network separated from the network of the vm for performance and security.  If I do this, all my virtual machines will have to go to 1 NIC b/c I only have 2 NICs per host.  I thought that I have just to keep all my groups of ports on the default vSwitch0 and add my second NETWORK adapter so that I can take advantage of the Association of NICs for redundancy and load balancing.  However, I'm not sure on the performance and the security risks.  Do you have any ideas or advice?  I could also create two virtual switches and put my virtual machines on one which would have a NETWORK card dedicated and put my service and Kernal VM console on another virtual switch with a dedicated network card.  However, in this scenario, I have no fault tolerance or load balancing.  We are a small shop and we have about 10-15 VMs on each host.  I don't have access to b/c distributed switching we paid only for the company (not more).  Thank you.

  Hi and welcome to the forums,

  With 10-15 VMs per box and I guess that I would seriously consider adding two extra cards for each host in the production machines. You could then do something like:

  vSwitch0 - vmnic0, vmnic2, vmnic3 - Console of Service, VM LAN network

  vSwitch1 - vmnic1 - VMkernel

  That would give you redundancy and performance to access your hosts (SC) and also for all your virtual machines. The VMkernel would get a NETWORK card dedicated for vMotion and could be on a separate network. He didn't need redundancy really as if the NIC sank the only issue is that you cannot vmotion virtual machines. In this case you would just move one of the NIC workgroup through to those switches manually.

  If you only have 2 network cards, then I would say having a vSwitch with two attached network adapters and VLAN the VMkernel may be off. I want absolutely to the redundancy of having two cards together.

  Hope this helps,

  Dan

• Can not pass traffic with label of vmware virtual switch fabric 10 GB

  Hello

  I need to understand how to move traffic labeled VMware VST to these virtual Fabric switch. Blades IBM HS22 connecting internally to the virtual switch between ports 1 to 14. I use 2 external ports (17-18), one connects to the Netgear switch and another to the other switch to virtual fabric. Did the same on the other virtual fabric switch. My Synology rackstation is configured with LUN iscsi that connect to the Netgear switch and I would like to connect my HS 22 rackstation blades. My main concern is that I can't ping the IP of netgear on the same interface vlan. I can ping my Synology diskstation to the netgear which are in the same vlan. NETGEAR and BNT switches are connected by cables DAC SFP +.

  

  Even VLAN is also configured on Netgear switch. The default pvid is set as 1 on all interfaces, can I disable this? Do I need to use tagpvid-penetration on all interfaces.

  SH run

  Current configuration:
  !
  version "7.8.7.
  switch type "IBM Networking OS virtual fabric 10 Gb Switch Module for IBM BladeCenter"
  iscli-new
  !
  timezone system 295
  ! Europe/Denmark
  Advanced System
  !

  SNMP-name of the server "BNT01".
  !
  hostname "BNT01".
  !
  !
  enable access userbbi
  !
  INT1 interface port
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1, 16-50, 3998-4000, 4095
  output
  !
  INT2 interface port
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1, 16-50, 3998-4000, 4095
  output
  !
  INT3 interface port
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1, 16-50, 3998-4000, 4095
  output
  !
  INT4 interface port
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1, 16-50, 3998-4000, 4095
  output
  !
  INT5 interface port
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1, 16-50, 3998-4000, 4095
  output
  !
  INT6 interface port
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1, 16-50, 3998-4000, 4095
  output
  !
  INT7 interface port
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1, 16-50, 3998-4000, 4095
  output
  !

  INT8 interface port
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1, 16-50, 3998-4000, 4095
  output
  !
  INT9 interface port
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1, 16-50, 3998-4000, 4095
  output
  !
  INT10 interface port
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1, 16-50, 3998-4000, 4095
  output
  !
  INT11 interface port
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1, 16-50, 3998-4000, 4095
  output
  !

  INT12 interface port
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1, 16-50, 3998-4000, 4095
  output
  !
  INT13 interface port
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1, 16-50, 3998-4000, 4095
  output
  !
  interface INT14 port
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1, 16-50, 3998-4000, 4095
  output
  !
  EXT1 interface port
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1, 16-50, 3998-4000
  output
  !
  EXT2 interface port
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 1, 16-50, 3998-4000
  output
  !

  !
  VLAN 1
  the name "Default".
  !
  VLAN 16
  name "VLAN16".
  !
  VLAN 17
  name "VLAN17".
  !
  VLAN 18
  name "VLAN18".
  !
  VLAN 19
  name "VLAN19".
  !
  VLAN 20
  name "VLAN20.
  !

  .

  .

  .

  .

  .

  .

  ..

  VLAN 46
  name "VLAN46".
  !
  VLAN 47
  name "VLAN47".
  !
  VLAN 48
  name "VLAN48".
  !
  VLAN 49
  name "VLAN49".
  !
  VLAN 50
  name "VLAN50".
  !
  VLAN 3998
  name "iscsi".
  !
  VLAN 3999
  name "vmotion".
  !
  VLAN 4000
  name "mgmt".
  !
  !
  !
  spanning tree mst configuration
  lethosting-name "region1".
  revision 2
  output
  !
  spanning tree mst mode
  !
  spanning tree mst configuration
  example of 1 vlan 16-50
  instance 2 vlan 3997,4000
  example 3 vlan 3998-3999
  output

  The configuration is for Teddy. I donno what I'm missing here? Any ideas would be very appreciated.

  Yes. Finally managed to do work. Tagged traffic now connects blades with ESXI 5.5 U2 to the Synology rackstation.

  It was the same thing we had. ESXi 6.0 is not supported by this adapter emulex. Also ESXi 5.5 does not I think with the iSCSI driver. So I have updated drivers using esxcli.

  VMware

  Updated network driver

  / tmp # software esxcli vib install v - /tmp/elxnet-10.0.575.9-1OEM.550.0.0.1331820.x86_64.vib
  Result of the installation
  Message: The update completed successfully, but the system must be restarted for the changes to be effective.
  Restart required: true
  VIBs installed: Emulex_bootbank_elxnet_10.0.575.9 - 1OEM.550.0.0.1331820
  VIBs removed: VMware_bootbank_elxnet_10.0.100.0v - 1vmw.550.0.0.1331820
  VIBs ignored:

  ISCSI driver update

  / tmp # software esxcli vib install v - /tmp/scsi-be2iscsi-4.6.261.0-1OEM.550.0.0.1198611.x86_64.vib
  Result of the installation
  Message: The update completed successfully, but the system must be restarted for the changes to be effective.
  Restart required: true
  VIBs installed: Emulex_bootbank_scsi - be2iscsi_4.6.261.0 - 1OEM.550.0.0.1198611
  VIBs deleted:
  VIBs ignored:
  / tmp # software esxcli vib install v - /tmp/ima-be2iscsi-4.6.261.0-1OEM.550.0.0.1198611.i386.vib
  Result of the installation
  Message: The update completed successfully, but the system must be restarted for the changes to be effective.
  Restart required: true
  VIBs installed: Emulex_bootbank_ima - be2iscsi_4.6.261.0 - 1OEM.550.0.0.1198611
  VIBs deleted:
  VIBs ignored:

  esxcli system set to true EI maintenanceMode
  esxcli system shutdown reboot - r = driverupdate d = 10

  After that, I created iSCSI vmkernel ports with the grouping. Ping has started working and now I can connect to the storage

• Flow of virtual switch

  I have a simple confirmation request.

  I have a standard virtual switch created from 4 physical nic, each with 10 GB uplink.

  This virtual switch throughput will be still only 10 GB or 40 GB?

  If it is 40 GB so how traffic is load-balanced through each physical network adapter, it is divided evenly?

  Is there a way I can find what virtual machines on this virutal turnout traffice going through physical nic at a time given time?

  The virtual network adapter (which in this case is probably a vmxnet3 adapter) is connected internally to the virtual switch, not to the link bottom-up itself. In fact, it is the same as in a physical world. Think of an Internet router. If this router has internal port 100MBit/s, that's what you'll see on your PC, but you will be very probably do not have a 100 Mbps Internet connection!

  André

• A Question about VM traffic through a virtual switch

  I have a question please. I though I read somewhere that if you have 2 virtual machines on the same host ESXi and they are on the same VLAN, when these virtual machines want to talk to each other that they don't let the ESXi host through physical network cards.

  Now, I read in the documentation which is only correct if the virtual network, they are on doesn't have an attached physical network adapter. In other words, you create a group of uplink / Port without an attached physical network adapter.

  So, since I'm using a distributed switch and say I have a Port named Phoung(VLAN 2) group that has an attached physical network adapter. Now I have 2 virtual machines on the same host ESXi on this VLAN and when they talk to each other the traffic will remain in the ESXi host, or will still be out of the physical network to the network card and come back.

  Read various documents on this subject has me a little confused. Thank you very much.

  Where did you read that the traffic will leave the virtual switch?

  If I have something miss me the traffic leaves the host if either the virtual machine is on different subnets (i.e. need to delivery), or if they are on different virtual switches.

  André

• Virtual switch with virtual bases DMZ

  Hi all

  trying to wrap my hands around it.  Sure you can have an ESXi installation without creating a virtual switch OK?  I have a scenario where they have 3 all current hosts to run ESXi 5.x.  It have a physical NIC card which is plugged in the demilitarized zone on the firewall and another NETWORK card inside network.  They want to get up some virtual machines in the DMZ.  I was under the impression that if dididn can't you have a virtual switch with a virtual DMZ then it would be a security risk.  Is the separate physical NIC enough?

  Thanks in advance!

  It doesn't matter what you need a virtual switch in order to have something to connect to the VM too.  If you like inside the network and a DMZ network then you can set up a separate virtual switch for each NETWORK card, that way you have separation virtual switch and physical NIC.  This way VM is placed only on the demilitarized zone would only speak and other DMZ VM inside VM is placed on the virtual switch inside would only speak to those.  Because of the way virtualization works it should be not to mention and the operating system is not between the two.  Now if that's enough, it's your security staff.  Some COMPUTER security requires a complete physical separation of workloads DMZ, some require only virtual separation.

• Distributed Virtual Switch supporting guests with different numbers of natachasery

  Our environment has had the same ESXi host model for some time. Each has interfaces from 2 to 10 GB for the traffic of the virtual machine. We use a virtual switch distributed with 2 uplinks. Now, we stand at a new environment where there are 2 types of hosts. (1) a small workload ESXi host with interfaces of 2 to 10 GB and (2) a large load of work sESXI host with 4 to 10 GB interfaces. They are seperasted in 2 groups (large and small workload workload).

  I had planned to share a Distributed Switch between the 2 groups, so I could move freely between them according to the needs. The only distinction of level of ESXi host is the power of horse and the I/O bandwidth (storage and networks VM will be used will be the same). It dawned on me that the distributed switch is configured with a particular number of uplinks. I'm trying to picture how this will work in this situation? I thought that I create a vSwitch distributed with 4 uplinks and finish by only using 2 of these uplinks when adding a small amount of work ESXi host to it. This is a valid configuration. Should I disable or do something special with the uplinks unused? I have not met this configuration so I wanted some tips on the correct configuration.

  I have validated this configuration as described previously. A dVS with 4 uplinks can take care of the guests with "up to" 4 interfaces. Hosts with only 2 interfaces will have 2 of the 4 links rising dVS associated with natachasery while the other 2 will remain unused. In my case, I decided to use the uplink 1 and 2. Uplinks 3 and 4 are not used with these hosts.

• Unable to add host to the distributed virtual switch

  Hello

  I'm trying to add a host to a virtual switch distributed through API (ReconfigureDvs_Task).

  I'll put the following text:

  VMWareDVSConfigSpec - configVersion, host

  DistributedVirtualSwitchHostMemberConfigSpec - operation, host, support

  DistributedVirtualSwitchHostMemberPnicBacking - pnicSpec

  DistributedVirtualSwitchHostMemberPnicSpec - pnicDevice

  Reconfigre_DvsTask fails with the following error in vcenter:

  An error occurred during the configuration of the host. the exception (vim.fault.PlatformConfigFault)

  VCenter newspapers also have the following information about this error:

  [error 04244 "utilshostMethod"] [HostMethodDispatcher::ProcessTaskResult] The appeal [createDistributedVirtualSwitch] host [host-*] failed with the exception [vim.fault.PlatformConfigFault]

  [error 03856 opID 'operationhostOp' = a0963b99] [MoDVSwitch::SendHostMemberChangeToHostsInParallel] failed calling host dvs Manager (op = add): got [exception vim.fault.PlatformConfigFault:]

  -> (vim.fault.PlatformConfigFault) {}

  -> dynamicType = < unset >

  -> faultCause = (vmodl. NULL in MethodFault),

  -> faultMessage = (vmodl. [LocalizableMessage)

  -> (vmodl. LocalizableMessage) {}

  -> dynamicType = < unset >

  -> key = "com.vmware.esx.hostctl.default"

  -> arg = (vmodl. [KeyAnyValue)

  -> (vmodl. KeyAnyValue) {}

  -> dynamicType = < unset >

  -> key = "reason."

  -> value = "error Sysinfo on operation returned status: busy.» See the VMkernel detailed error information log. "

  -->             }

  -->          ],

  -> message = ' operation failed, the diagnostic report: error Sysinfo on operation returned status: busy.» See the VMkernel detailed error information log. "

  -->       }

  -->    ],

  -> text = ""

  -> msg = "an error occurred during the configuration of the host."

  ->}]

  Any help will be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you!

  try to add the host by using some unused network cards...

• Configuration of virtual switch distributed to a display environment

  Are there specific practices around implementation of control network IO for a display environment. It is always better to separate the service console and keep on a standard virtual switch?

  I think that now its all what you're most comftorable with.  How many cards you like who could dictate how you would be put in place?

• Distributed Virtual Switch 5.1 update

  Hi all

  We have a vmware vsphere Cluster with 7 v 5.1 ESXi hosts 838463

  We have the form of upgrade version 5.0 to 5.1 ESXi ESXi and vCenter Server since version 5.0 to 5.1 September 2012.

  Now, I noticed that (just a little late...  ;-)) all the distributed virtual switches (we have 2 DVS) need to upgrade.  Version of DVS resulted, in fact, to be 5.0.

  (I saw in vSphere client connected to the server vCenter Server - networking).

  I wasn't expecting this behavior, DVS independent upgrade of host or vcenter server upgrade?

  It is possible DVS upgrade during the normal activity of the infrastructure?

  Thanks in advance

  Anna

  Think about the situation,

  don't forget that a dVS is a virtual switch split on all hosts, if the dVS has been automatically upgraded to the new version and there were incompatibilities or new features that were not available in the switch downstream you might run the risk of a network outage.

  in my opinion rightly done VMware cela a phyiscal post upgrade task,