Minimum time to wait in the loop of reading series

Similar Questions

• A wait timer is needed in a loop of consumer?

  I have a leak of test engine and motor servo which is a loop of consumer being called via "Start Asynchronous Call" several times for each device.  A contractor I work with said that I need to add a timer wait since the dequeue tie up the processor.  Is this true?

  I kind of logic that awaits the dequeue to treat something immediately, but I thought that the time-out would free the loop as a wait timer to zero.  He says he doesn't because he is still waiting to remove something.  What the experts think about it?

  

  nonecure wrote:

  So the dequeue will normally be on the CPU?  Is this similar to an empty loop without a wait timer?  Not a lot of treatment, but taking processor resources?

  Lol if there is nothing in the queue, Dequeue item causes a 'sleep '.  This is similar to the Structure of your event until the event.  They use no CPU while you wait for a message.

  Now if you have a lot of things in your queue, then your loop could run as fast as possible to play catch-up.

• complete the loop and get data

  I need to acquire the acquisition values of data every x seconds. Waiting in the loop of data acquisition is defined so that the next N samples are acquired after x seconds. Pressing stop the loop of consumer DAQ stops after the sec x which is connected to the wait function.

  1. how to stop the inner loop immediately when you press a stop?

  I also write acquired samples after doing some calculations on the samples.

  1. plan of sample of the queue to file consumer loop. Is there any other recommendations such as drop loop is not without samples? How many data can an expectation of the queue?

  Thank you.

  sonotk,

  You've missed the point. Rather than having a 5000 milliseconds of wait, use an expectation of 100 ms and count the number of times that you have been waiting for 100 ms.  When the count reaches 50, sample and start the count again.

  The counter is just in the shift register containing an integer. Inside the while loop you have a box structure. Test the shift count register to see if it is 50. If set to True, use the real case of the structure of the case. Inside, it's all in your loop except waiting and the logic of the judgment. In the case of false, you add 1 to the shift register and wait 100 ms.

  Looking at your picture code once again, it seems that the shift with TempData and VoltData regsiters are not necessary because you never use the data previous iteration on the left side.

  Ranjeet,

  Make a simple VI with two loops and some expectations.  Run with execution highlighting market to see what is happening.  It is a good learning tool.

  Lynn

• For the direction of the loop

  I need a direction with the loop For
  
  I use a loop to sink and Array. Everything works except that I need to wait for the loop. Each time that the loop runs that I download an image. I want to wait for the image download continue to the next wait image and continue the loop. The problem is the loop runs too fast, I use a loop or once a loop and an 'IF '?
  
  I don't want to use a timer, because it can take more time to download an image then the timer.
  
  Can someone put me on the right track?
  
  Thank you

  You can't make a loop to wait.

  use the functions of two (or several) to call each other. who will form a loop and any function call may be delayed while you wait for an asynchronous event (such as a load of movieclip) to occur.

• Then as the loop timer Timing vannes_ouvertes. Elements

  I would like this while loop to iterate through every second. But it seems that he doesen't recognize the loop timer. What's wrong?

  

  Just found the article to help talking about it: Debugging of FPGA screws using Mode Simulation (FPGA Module)

  At the bottom, it says:

  Understanding simulated time on the host computer

  If you use some FPGA resources and you run the FPGA VI in simulated using I/O simulation mode, the resource uses simulated time rather than real time. Simulated time could be faster than real time according to the number of events that occur during the simulation. For example, if you add a waiting VI (simulated time) for the schema and set the timeout to 1000 ms, LabVIEW does not attempt to delay a second of real time. Instead, LabVIEW delays as long as necessary before performing the next action scheduled in the simulation.

  The following resources are using the simulated time on the host:

  • Then the loops
  
  
  • Single-Cycle timed loops
  
  
  • VI of waiting (simulated time)
  
  
  • Loop timer Express VI
  
  
  • Number of cycles Express VI
  
  
  • FIFO, except DMA FIFO
  
  
  • Wait on Occurrence with Timeout based on ticks
  
  
  • Interrupt the VI, during her wait until this that clear is TRUE

• Model in the loop timed While the elapsed time

  Hello NOR community,

  I'm trying to use a while loop timed to run controller simulated for a mechanical system test. I need the time loop to run at an even 50 Hz to simulate the controller that will eventually drive the mechanical system. To check the speed at which the loop runs, I made a VI that gets a value from each loop clock and subtracts the value of the clock of the current iteration of the value of the clock of the previous iteration. I have eliminated all other codes this VI except for the recovery of the clock, to ensure that no problem with another code in VI. I find that the time between iterations is not constant, but it is consistent. In other words, the elapsed time can change at each loop, but it changes according to a specific model, such that the average elapsed time is equal to the value that I use for the timed loop. The loop will run faster than posed for several cycles, then slow down during a cycle even at the same time. Here are some examples:

  Running at 5 Hz: elapsed switches schedules between 0.203125 and 0,187500 seconds

  Clocked at 8 Hz: time is constantly 0.125 seconds.

  Operating at 10 Hz: elapsed switches schedules between 0,109375 and 0,093750 seconds

  By examining the differences between elapsed time and the stability of the 8 Hz setting, it seems that there is a minimum time of 0,015625 seconds (64 Hz) division. It is much worse than the 1ms accuracy claimed in documentation. This could be the cause?

  I am running Windows XP with LabVIEW version 8.5.1 and have observed this behavior on several computers with different screws

  Thank you!

  Erik

  Your problem is the function that you use to get the current time.  It's just the time of the Windows clock which has a resolution of 16 msec.

  You must use the function of number of cycles as Jarle has pointed out.

• Should I wait until the end of the execution time of the query for the execution plan?

  Hello Experts,

  I want to see the execution plan of the query below. However, it takes more than 3 hours. Should I wait all the time to see the execution plan?

  Note: EXPLAIN PLAN for does not work. (I mean that I do not see the actual line number, etc. with EXPLAIN the PLAN of market)

  You can see the output of the execution plan when I canceled the execution after 1 minute.

  My first question is: what should I do to see the execution plan for queries running out of time time?

  2nd question: when I cancel the query during execution in order to see the execution plan, will I see the specific plan of execution or erroneous values? Because the first execution plan seems inaccurate, what do you think?

  question 3: why EXPLAIN the PLAN for the clause does not work? Also, should I use EXPLAIN the PLAN of the clause to this scenerio? Can I see the result of running for long time without her queries?

  Thnaks for your help.

  Oracle Database 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64 bit Production

  PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production

  CORE Production 11.2.0.2.0

  AMT for Linux: Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production

  NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production

  Select / * + GATHER_PLAN_STATISTICS NO_PARALLEL * / J.INVOICEACCOUNT, J.INVOICEID, J.INVOICEDATE, (T.LINEAMOUNT + T.LINEAMOUNTTAX) price

  of custinvoicejour j join custinvoicetrans t on

  substr (nls_lower (j.DataAreaId), 1, 7) = substr (nls_lower (t.dataareaid), 1, 7) and

  substr (nls_lower (J.INVOICEID), 1: 25) = substr (nls_lower (t.INVOICEID), 1: 25)

  where

  substr (nls_lower (T.DATAAREAID), 1, 7) = '201' and T.AVBROCHURELINENUM = 29457

  and substr (nls_lower (j.dataareaid), 1, 7) = '201' and

  J.INVOICEACCOUNT in

  (select IT. Drmpos.avtr_seg_cust_campend ACCOUNTNUM this where THIS. CAMPAIGN = '201406' and THIS. SEGMENT_LEVEL in (', 'E'))

  and J.AVAWARDSALES > 190

  and substr (nls_lower (J.AVBILLINGCAMPAIGN), 1, 13) = '201406'

  "and J.INVOICEDATE between ' 04.06.2014' and ' 13.06.2014 ';

  SQL_ID, dznya6x7st0t8, number of children 0

  -------------------------------------

  Select / * + GATHER_PLAN_STATISTICS NO_PARALLEL * / J.INVOICEACCOUNT,.

  J.INVOICEID, J.INVOICEDATE, (T.LINEAMOUNT + T.LINEAMOUNTTAX) price of

  CustInvoiceJour j join custinvoicetrans t on

  substr (nls_lower (j.DataAreaId), 1, 7) =

  substr (nls_lower (t.DataAreaId), 1, 7) and

  = substr (nls_lower (J.INVOICEID), 1: 25)

  substr (nls_lower (t.INVOICEID), 1: 25) where

  substr (nls_lower (T.DATAAREAID), 1, 7) = '201' and T.AVBROCHURELINENUM =

  29457 and substr (nls_lower, (j.dataareaid), 1, 7) = '201' and

  J.INVOICEACCOUNT in (select CE. ACCOUNTNUM of

  drmpos.avtr_seg_cust_campend this where THIS. CAMPAIGN = '201406' and

  IT. SEGMENT_LEVEL in (', 'E')) and J.AVAWARDSALES > 190 and

  substr (nls_lower (J.AVBILLINGCAMPAIGN), 1, 13) = '201406' and

  "J.INVOICEDATE between ' 04.06.2014' and ' 13.06.2014 '.

  Hash value of plan: 2002317666

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | Operation | Name                           | Begins | E - lines. A - lines.   A - time | Pads | Bed |  OMem |  1Mem | Used Mem.

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |                                |      1.        |      0 | 00:00:00.01 |       0 |      0 |       |       |          |

  |*  1 |  HASH JOIN |                                |      1.   3956.      0 | 00:00:00.01 |       0 |      0 |  2254K |  1061K | 2190K (0) |

  |*  2 |   HASH JOIN |                                |      1.     87.  16676. 00:00:01.64 |     227K |   3552.  3109K |  1106K | 4111K (0) |

  |*  3 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | CUSTINVOICEJOUR |      1.   1155 |  31889 | 00:00:01.16 |     223KO |     15.       |       |          |

  |*  4 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN | I_062INVOICEDATEORDERTYPEIDX |      1.   4943 |    134K | 00:00:00.83 |   45440 |      0 |       |       |          |

  |   5.    SIMPLE LIST OF PARTITION.                                |      1.  82360 |    173K | 00:00:00.08 |    3809 |   3537 |       |       |          |

  |*  6 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL | AVTR_SEG_CUST_CAMPEND |      1.  82360 |    173K | 00:00:00.06 |    3809 |   3537 |       |       |          |

  |   7.   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | CUSTINVOICETRANS |      1.   4560 |      0 | 00:00:00.01 |       0 |      0 |       |       |          |

  |*  8 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN | I_064INVLINENUMCAMPAIGNOFPRICE |      1.   4560 |      0 | 00:00:00.01 |       0 |      0 |       |       |          |

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  1 - access("J".") "SYS_NC00299$"="T". "' SYS_NC00165$ ' AND SUBSTR (NLS_LOWER ('J'. "" "" REFFACTURE")(, 1, 25) = SUBSTR (NLS_LOWER ("T"." "" "REFFACTURE")(, 1, 25)).

  2 - access("J".") INVOICEACCOUNT '= SYS_OP_C2C ("EC". ". ACCOUNTNUM'))

  3 - filter("J".") AVAWARDSALES"> 190)

  4 - access("J".") SYS_NC00299$ "= U ' 201"AND "J". INVOICEDATE"> = TO_DATE(' 2014-06-04 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND

  "J"." SYS_NC00307$ "= U ' 201406"AND "J". INVOICEDATE"< = TO_DATE (' 2014-06-13 00:00:00 ',' syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')))

  filter ((' J'. "INVOICEDATE' > = 'J' AND TO_DATE(' 2014-06-04 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') '." " SYS_NC00307$ "= U '201406' AND"

  "J"." INVOICEDATE"< = TO_DATE (' 2014-06-13 00:00:00 ',' syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))))

  6 filter (("CE". "SEGMENT_LEVEL" = A "OR"THIS"." SEGMENT_LEVEL "=" E"))

  8 - access("T".") SYS_NC00165$ "= U ' 201"AND "T". AVBROCHURELINENUM "= 29457)

  filter ("T". ("AVBROCHURELINENUM" = 29457)

  EXPLAIN PLAN FOR

  Select / * + GATHER_PLAN_STATISTICS NO_PARALLEL * / J.INVOICEACCOUNT, J.INVOICEID, J.INVOICEDATE, (T.LINEAMOUNT + T.LINEAMOUNTTAX) price

  of custinvoicejour j join custinvoicetrans t on

  substr (nls_lower (j.DataAreaId), 1, 7) = substr (nls_lower (t.dataareaid), 1, 7) and

  substr (nls_lower (J.INVOICEID), 1: 25) = substr (nls_lower (t.INVOICEID), 1: 25)

  where

  substr (nls_lower (T.DATAAREAID), 1, 7) = '201' and T.AVBROCHURELINENUM = 29457

  and substr (nls_lower (j.dataareaid), 1, 7) = '201' and

  J.INVOICEACCOUNT in

  (select IT. Drmpos.avtr_seg_cust_campend ACCOUNTNUM this where THIS. CAMPAIGN = '201406' and THIS. SEGMENT_LEVEL in (', 'E'))

  and J.AVAWARDSALES > 190

  and substr (nls_lower (J.AVBILLINGCAMPAIGN), 1, 13) = '201406'

  "and J.INVOICEDATE between ' 04.06.2014' and ' 13.06.2014 ';

  SELECT * FROM table (DBMS_XPLAN. DISPLAY_CURSOR);

  SELECT * FROM table (DBMS_XPLAN. DISPLAY_CURSOR ('7h1nbzqjgwsp7', 2));

  SQL_ID, 7h1nbzqjgwsp7, number of children 2

  EXPLAIN PLAN for select / * + GATHER_PLAN_STATISTICS NO_PARALLEL * /.

  J.INVOICEACCOUNT, J.INVOICEID, J.INVOICEDATE,

  (T.LINEAMOUNT + T.LINEAMOUNTTAX) join price j custinvoicejour

  CustInvoiceTrans t on substr (nls_lower (j.dataareaid), 1, 7) =

  substr (nls_lower (t.DataAreaId), 1, 7) and

  = substr (nls_lower (J.INVOICEID), 1: 25)

  substr (nls_lower (t.INVOICEID), 1: 25) where

  substr (nls_lower (T.DATAAREAID), 1, 7) = '201' and T.AVBROCHURELINENUM =

  29457 and substr (nls_lower, (j.dataareaid), 1, 7) = '201' and

  J.INVOICEACCOUNT in (select CE. ACCOUNTNUM of

  drmpos.avtr_seg_cust_campend this where THIS. CAMPAIGN = '201406' and

  IT. SEGMENT_LEVEL in (', 'E')) and J.AVAWARDSALES > 190 and

  substr (nls_lower (J.AVBILLINGCAMPAIGN), 1, 13) = '201406' and

  "J.INVOICEDATE between ' 04.06.2014' and ' 13.06.2014 '.

  NOTE: cannot fetch SQL_ID plan: 7h1nbzqjgwsp7, CHILD_NUMBER: 2

  Check the value of SQL_ID and CHILD_NUMBER;

  It could also be that the plan is no longer in the cursor cache (check v$ sql_plan)

  NightWing wrote:

  Randolf,

  I don't understand. What you hear from the above statement that you mean A-lines and E will be incorrect, but the ratio between them remain the same. Therefore, you can deduct the bad things by comparing the differences.

  Thus, A-lines always give a wrong result for cancellation of queries, isn't it?

  Charlie,

  I think that Martin gave a good explanation. Here's another example that hopefully makes more obvious things:

  17:56:55 SQL >-things go very wrong here with a small buffer cache

  17:56:55 SQL >-T2 lines are badly scattered when you access through T1. FK

  17:56:55 SQL >--

  17:56:55 SQL >-"Small job" approach would have been a good idea

  17:56:55 SQL >-if the estimate of 100 iterations of the loop was correct!

  17:56:55 SQL > select

  17:56:55 (t2.attr2) count 2

  17:56:55 3 of

  17:56:55 4 t1

  17:56:55 5, t2

  17:56:55 6 where

  17:56:55   7  /*------------------*/

  17:56:55 8 trunc (t1.attr1) = 1

  17:56:55 9 and trunc (t1.attr2) = 1

  17:56:55 10 / *-* /.

  17:56:55 11 and t1.fk = t2.id

  17:56:55 12.

  T1

  *

  ERROR on line 4:

  ORA-01013: user has requested the cancellation of the current operation

  Elapsed time: 00:04:58.30

  18:01:53 SQL >

  18:01:53 SQL > @xplan_extended_display_cursor ' ' ' ' 'ALLSTATS LAST + COST.

  18:01:53 SQL > set echo off verify off termout off

  SQL_ID, 353msax56jvvp, number of children 0

  -------------------------------------

  SELECT count (t2.attr2) from t1, t2 where

  / / *-* trunc (t1.attr1) = 1 and

  trunc (T1.attr2) = 1 / *-* / and t1.fk = t2.id

  Hash value of plan: 2900488714

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  | ID | The NEST | DSB | Operation | Name | Begins | E - lines. Cost (% CPU). A - lines.   A - time | Pads | Bed |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  |   0 |     |   7. SELECT STATEMENT |        |      1.        |  4999 (100) |      0 | 00:00:00.01 |       0 |      0 |

  |   1.   0 |   8 2 GLOBAL TRI |        |      1.      1.            |      0 | 00:00:00.01 |       0 |      0 |

  |   2.   1.   5.   NESTED LOOPS |        |      1.        |            |  57516 | 00:04:58.26 |     173K |  30770 |

  |   3.   2.   3.    NESTED LOOPS |        |      1.    100.  4999 (1) |  57516 | 00:00:21.06 |     116K |   3632.

  |*  4 |   3.   1.     TABLE ACCESS FULL | T1 |      1.    100.  4799 (1) |  57516 | 00:00:00.19 |    1008 |   1087 |

  |*  5 |   3.   2.     INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | T2_IDX |  57516 |      1.     1 (0) |  57516 | 00:00:20.82 |     115K |   2545 |

  |   8 2 2 |   4.    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | T2 |  57516 |      1.     2 (0) |  57516 | 00:04:37.14 |   57516 |  27138 |

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

  ---------------------------------------------------

  4 filter ((TRUNC ('T1'. "ATTR1") = 1 AND TRUNC ('T1'. " ATTR2') = 1))

  5 - access("T1".") FK '= 'T2'.' (ID')

  You say here that I canceled a query after about 5 minutes, and looking at the statistics of content (RowSource) I can already say the following:

  1. the estimation of cardinality of T1 is far - the optimizer estimated 100 lines, but it actually generated more than 57000 lines when the query was cancelled. If this definitely seems like a candidate at the origin of the problems

  2. the query has spent most of the time in search of random table T2

  So while it is true that I don't know final A-lines of this cancelled query information, I can still say a lot of this and begin to deal with the problems identified so far.

  Randolf

• It's time to install el capitan.  I have yosemite with the latest updates and I want to wait until the el capitan has been debugged before the upgrade.  I noticed a significant el capitan updated dec 8 2015.

  It of time to upgrade my 10.10.5 yosemite to El Capitan or should I wait for another update or two?

  El Capitan: I upgraded a mid 2009 MacBook Pro about 2 months ago and have had problems since then. I usually wait a long time to upgrade to the new operating system, but it is my wife's laptop and not as critical that the machine I use for work so I've updated earlier against my rule for a long time to wait. Now I remember why I waited. I spent several hours trying to bugs, but nothing has worked so far. I had the hope that the update version 10.11.2 could solve these problems, but to no avail. I'll probably go back to the last backup with Yosemite. Some people have had success with El Capitan, but I've seen much info on problems with this updated online in my search for a solution for the MacBook Pro. If your computer is critical you I suggest you wait a while to update.

  iOS 9.2: I installed on the iPhone 5 s and have no problem I know.

• How can I control the working time so that the loop structure in the cases where the structure?

  Hi all

  My job is: Loop While structure generates the signal for 4 seconds when you press the 'start build' button, after that data has been backed up. You press the button "generate the beginning' once again, and the loop runs one again.

  My problem is: the first pressing, the loop, exactly 4 s (3, 999 s), but him second, third pressing on... The time elapsed is not 4 seconds, always smaller (even ~ s 0.003). The loop works correctly after press the "Exit" button and launch the program again.

  How can I control exactly time loop work While Structure without the press "Exit".

  Thank you any help!

  P/S: I used the number of cycles (ms) just to look at a working time of the While loop.

  NMCuong

  This shows a quick solution

  

• is this a correct way to write data every time the loop is executed?

  I created a VI, and my goal is to save data every time the loop is executed. So far, I only learned to write binary file... I wish I could write numeric value directly...

  The only problem is that I am not if my method is correct, because I'm afraid that each time that the loop is executed, the previous binary data will be replaced... I don't want that occur.

  Do you think that my logic is appropriate in what concerns the registration data?

  Thank you!

  Your logic is fine. You replace data because the file pointer will be that your data is written. If your program stops, and then you restart, and you want the data to add to the file, you can use the file value position VI and the pointer value 0 bytes of the end. set this position once, after you open the file (so out of the loop) and then data will be added.

  If what you mean by "write a number directly," is to write something in a human newsfeeds format, you can use writing to text file instead of writing to a binary file. Then, use the VI format string or fractional number string VI to convert your double into a string and write it.

• Why the execution time increases with a while loop, but not with "run continuously?

  Hi all

  I have a problem of severe weather that I don't know how to fix it because I don't know exactly where it comes from.

  I order two RF switches via a data acquisition card (NI USB-6008). One job at the same time can be selected on each switch. Basically, the VI created for this feature (by a colleague) resets all the outputs of acquisition data and active then those desired. It has three entrances, two chain simp0le controls and a cluster table, that contains the list of all the outputs and some practical information to know what is connected (specific to my application).

  I use this VI in a complex application, and I have some problems with the execution time, which increased whenever I said the VI, so I did a test VI (TimeTesting.vi) to determine where the problem came. In this special VI I record the execution time in a csv file to analyze then with excel.

  After several tries, I found that if I run this criterion VI with the while loop, execution on every cycle time increases, but if I remove the while loop and use the funtionnality "Continuous run", the execution time remains the same. In my high level application, I have while loops and events, and so the runtime increases too.

  I someone could explain to me why execution time increases and how can we avoid this? I have attached my VI test and the necessary subVIs, as well as an image of a graph that shows the execution time with a while loop and «run permanently»

  Thanks a lot for your help!

  Your SetReset_DO VI creates a channel whenever it is called.  And that you never delete a task.

  When running continuously, that it's as if it only runs once and LabVIEW has internal mechanisms to close references that will not be used again.  When a VI is used as a Subvi, LV does not know if she will be called again, and lacks these things until the first level VI stops. You have a memory leak.

  Just as you open and close your file outside the loop for, create your channel out of the loop.

  Lynn

• Help urgently needed! -User profile takes a long time to load and the rest of the screen with the message "Please wait loading profile service user.

  Hello

  Every time that connect us to servers of TS farm, the profile of the user load for a long time and she stays with a message "Please wait for the user profile service" for longer than 5-6 minutes. We work in two areas which is configured as "an endorsement of forest transitive way." The domain (domain A) with TS farms hence connect us a cross forest profile disabled so we cannot load the roaming profile in this area, whereas another domain (domain B) roaming profile user's roaming profile.

  Also in the directory the Active directory of the domain B, TS/RDS settings is enabled for the problematic profile.

  TS / RDS--> roaming profile path and TS home folder is configured. TS/RDS settings is configured because we use other farms of machines/TS citrix other than the one in which there is problem.

  When disable us TS/RDS of the directory settings active directory domain B, then it is extracted to improvement in time. But we're in a situation were we cannot disable TS/RDS settings as we use other Citrix machines also. So we tried configuration GPO in A TS domain as

  Which allows to "allow only the local user profile".

  Allowing 'profiles itinerant Prevent password propagation to the server.

  This allows to "Allow asynchronous user group policy processing when you connect via Terminal Server Services"

  But still, there is no improvement in the time taken by the server to connect. What is the adjustment to make in the field of A TS, such that he will not try to charge the roaming of the B domain user profile, even if TS/RDS settings for the user profile are configured?

  Forums of evil: you want to Technet forums.  It's more domestic consumption...

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/

• Why is the Table in the loop without delay time flashing

  Hello everyone

  Why I put Table in the loop without any delay, the front table still flashes?

  How can I avoid this situation?

  This situation is related to the level of the PC?

  

  Hello

  This problem was presented as a request for corrective measures, several years ago although there always seems to be involved.

  Sometimes this is because the table is constantly updated, but at a slow pace, enough to be visible. If you place a Boolean button on the table on front panel indicator and make transparent (I used a Cancel button that uses a locking mechanism when released), this will force off update screen and flashing minimum.

• Too much time in the queue empty in the loop of consumption

  I'm working on a VI used to screen analog converters above temperatures from room temperature to 175 C.  I have it set in place with a producer and a consumer loop.  The loop of producer makes all the measures, while consumer loop allows you to write tests that all measures in a spreadsheet file. There are 23 steps taken and recorded every second.  The test is run for about 60 minutes.

  Initially, I had trouble with data in the queue being lost when I stopped the VI.  I fixed that by ensuring that the queue was completely empty before you stop the VI.  Now my VI will continue to work long after I pressed the stop button.  I let it run for up to an hour and finally abandoned the operation and still lost a large number of measures on the end of the queue.  From my reading on the forums, it's because of the overload to write to a file of measure.  Opening and closing of the file every second is any slowdown.

  I've seen examples of creating a table of measured data and only writing every 100 samples or more.  Can someone help me see how I could implement something like this in my code?  Is there another reason, it takes so long to write all my test data?

  Thank you

  Matt

  You must use the real file i/o functions.  That made the express VI to write files to measure opens the file, writing the data and then close it.  When you do this several times, you get a really slow performance.  If you must open the file before you consumer loop and close it after the loop.  You will then be able to write as much as you want inside the loop.  But now, you need to format the data yourself.

• synchronize the loop with the time on the computer

  I'd like to run a while loop exactly all the 1 minute, with the minute that occur according to the time on the computer at 0 seconds.

  a timed loop runs a minute after the loop is started and is not synchronized with the 0 seconds of time on the computer.

  How do I get there? I realize the first loop will be less than 1 minute, due to the synchronisation.

  Thanks, that helped me.

  I thought at the start of the second 1 loop would consume resources additional, but realized it's negligible.

  I ended up using quotient/remainder on time on the computer in seconds and checking when the remainder is 0, as this allowed for the second interval.