Multichannel policy statement

Similar Questions

• Some VMDK of getting scratched twice when the policy States 1 stripe. Disc format 6.0 VSAN 2.

  So I noticed this strange problem on my virtual SAN. 99% of my VMDK are properly implemented with 1 witness and a raid 1 array with 1 disk of two hosts. Like in this picture.

  

  Now, here is an another VM, with the same storage policy, creating a raid 0 of mirrors and to use more space than I care to provide to the virtual machine.

  

  I tried to reapply policies and nothing changes. It's not a huge deal, but I'm just curious to know what would cause this. Oh yes and the kicker is still its in line with the policy says VSAN.

  

  It's perfectly normal in a number of situations and is not a bug. For example, let's do all this time, a VMDK is larger than 255 GB. We are also when there is not enough disk space. See the series of Cormac Virtual SAN (VSAN) - CormacHogan.com blog and specifically part 23: http://cormachogan.com/2014/04/23/vsan-part-23-why-is-my-storage-object-striped/

  I also want to clarify that, contrary to what you said that a RAID-0 doesn't consume additional disk space. It is simply a way to split a mirror into smaller pieces. In short, the size changes however.

  Regarding compliance, if you find the definition, StripeWidth is a _minimum_ of batteries by mirror number to use. VSAN is free to use several axes. Note also in previous cases where we use RAID-0, we can place two strips on the same disc, as long that satisfy the minimum of StripeWidth pins of the requested user.

  Christian

• Issues of multichannel policy parameters

  Hi all

  How it the multipath initially set to data warehouses? Storage decide? We could see performance degraded the latency of IO, and a representative of support 3PAR recently suggested changing the Round Robin of the value default MRU we ran on the LUNS of 3PAR. I don't know how this will help because I don't think that Round Robin has been link aggregation, turning rather just paths to push the e/s down.

  Anyway, when I checked my paths of an EMC device, we also, they were already the Round Robin value, so I was wondering if the table defines this and if yes, why 3PAR suggests something different from their table defines by default.

  Hello sel57,

  By default, ESXi checks the type of storage, then depending on the type of storage it sets the default policy that is ideal for this type of storage. For more information, you can check the following:

  Chapter 23: Understanding multipath and failover

  http://pubs.VMware.com/vSphere-55/topic/com.VMware.ICbase/PDF/vSphere-ESXi-vCenter-Server-551-storage-Guide.PDF

  Also, you can check the link HCL. For each storage vendor, the type, the Firmware version and the version of ESXi, there is a suggested path selection policy. So according to storage provider, type, Firmware version, and esxi version the best access path selection policy is enabled by default.

  VMware Compatibility Guide: search for storage/SAN

  For example, in the link above, I searched for EMC and ESXi 5.5 U1.

  So, in summary, the default value is set and tested and the time to begin the best appropriate policy is selected. Is there is no specific reason or suggestion of the storage provider then only you must modify the default policy or not.

  Hope that answers the question.

• Policy statement multi-channel datastore/RDM

  I'm looking to create a fairly complex data .csv store report - the data / the following columns:

  Data Center |  Cluster |  HostName (short name, not FQDN |)  Identification (name of the data store, if not datastore call RDM |)  Canonical name.  LUN # |   Political MPP |   Name of the vendor

  I know that these data can be obtained with several different commands, however put it all together in a single report is another challenge...

  Any help would be appreciated...

  I use a variation on this script that displays the Monday in the matrix (instead of text).

  Try this one

• See Multipathing policy

  
  How can I check the policy of Multipathing through all hosts on my cluster?

  Take a look at 3 Re: multichannel policy statement  

  Instead of making for all ESXi hosts in a cluster, you can just do a Get-VMHost to cover all ESXi hosts.
  

• Initial startup error on new NB305-106

  Hello

  I have recived my NB305-106 new this afternoon, but it is coming up with an error on the ethernet controller on the first boot: PXE - E61: media test failure, check cable. PXE - M0F: Exit PXE ROM.

  I saw a few forums AV requesting the change of boot order, but I do not have access in the menu of configuration for some reason any. The next policy statement is that the hard drive is not split in properly so everything must go out and get new. Is this the case?

  Thank you

  Amy Lawrence

  > but I do not have access in the menu of configuration for some reason any

  I don't know what's the problem with him. But to enter into the Bios (F2) and check the 1st boot priority device, should be the hard drive

  > The next policy statement is that the hard drive is not split in properly so everything must go out and get new. Is this the case?

  Perhaps the hard drive is not well connected.

  Anyway, if I understand correctly, it ' quite new and you need to replace if does not work.

• Is it possible for Microsoft to scan any computer for reasons of "public security"?

  is it not real elements like Panther allow a virtual environment that is almost undetectable by the IT Admin means? My data and user / open safety of MS changed at a session using the virtual environment that is secretly activated through programs / "features" like the Panther and CBS (sp?), etc.?  Has been done for one user so far?

  I'm not the first and I think that this technology is used to violate the civil rights of others on a mass scale.  Given that this could be a matter of national security, I am reaching out.

  I'm being hacked by what appears to be aggressive MS security, using the Panther, and other 'features' of this virutualize my PC... .ESP all drivers seem to be based USB mimicking their physical counterparts.

  I think that this is done to steal information in real time. Each device can be controlled and even crime prepared by the staff.

  My directories are deleted esp my user profile and all files under it.

  most patches are disabled as any device to save the data. my SD card is not recognized, and when that I log out I get windows blue screen which I think happens when the profile is deleted during a session.

  It's very dangerous for me.  VERY so... I need help!

  No restore points left or I'm not familiar with the operating system to learn how to restore them since I do not know where they live.

  I did this activity more and more malicious for more than a month on several PC.  I keep two on sneaker net so I have a database of illegal activities.

  I have never agreed to any person using my hard drive, steal my personal and because files that I am involved in a case of corruption of local authorities in the County, I hope that charges to go to the way a federal investigation since I posted this question for some time.  This isn't a joke.

  for example, the trash is moved or deleted, but to help to restore I have much evidence to prove my case to the FBI.  I am trying to get a response from Microsoft before I go this route.

  Tai-Decker

  The best answer I can give you is to point you in the direction of some here Microsoft privacy policies:

  Microsoft Privacy

  Microsoft online policy statement .

  In what concerns the intentions of ability and real Microsoft then you have to make that determination for yourself. Any comment here would be conjecture and enter the realms of the "conspiracy theories". Personally, I honestly have no knowledge on this subject and will not comment.

• Army of DOD wiping hard drives software

  Looking for a military DOD certified disk formatting hard/wiping Softeare, I see a lot of websites for it but that one is for real?

  As far as I KNOW, there is no such thing as DoD "certified" disk wiping software.  Currently, the only way to clean up the acceptable magnetic media for the DoD is degaussing--> http://www.oregon.gov/DAS/OP/docs/policy/state/107-009-005_Exhibit_B.pdf?ga=t

  Effective immediately, DSS will approve is more crushing for procedures for the disinfection or decommissioning (e.g. communication to lower the level classified information controls) IS storage devices (for example, hard drives) used for classified processing.

  I think that some more paranoid 3-letter agencies require the physical destruction of the magnetic media (for example, merge in an oven).

  If you only want in the protection of your personal data, Darik Boot and Nuke (among other things), provides several methods, including even the method of "Dod short" should be more than enough.  See, for example, http://users.telenet.be/mydotcom/howto/data/dbantest.htm

• How to configure DiffServ on PC6200

  Hello

  I need to configure DiffServ on a switch of PC6248 and PC5548. Can you provide an example config coomands creating 2 classes. 1 video and 1 data and assign it at the end of the ports of the device.

  Also how to configure ports trunk with classes? It is even necessary?

  Thank you

  To use DiffServ QoS, we must first define their criteria and categories:

  1. class: create classes and define criteria of class

  2. political: create strategies, associate political classes and define policy statements

  3. service: Add a policy to an incoming interface

  Packets are classified and treatment on the basis of criteria defined. The classification criteria is defined by a

  class. The treatment is defined by the attributes of a font. Policy attributes can be defined on a per class

  each instance and it is these attributes that are applied when a match occurs. A policy can contain

  multiple classes. When the policy is active, the measures taken dependent on the class that matches the package.

  Package treatment begins by checking the class for a packet matching criteria. A policy is applied to a package

  When a class is within this policy is found.

  The Differentiated Services menu page contains

  If you had a video on VLAN 22 and wanted to assign a specific preference and assign it to port 1. Orders should look like this.

  class-map correspondence test22 ipv4

  game of vlan 22

  output

  Policy-map test23 in

  class test22

  Assign-queue 4

  output

  interface ethernet 1/g1

  service-policy in test23

  There are several different match criteria that can be used. The user and CLI guides describe the available options.

  http://www.Dell.com/support/manuals/us/en/19/product/PowerConnect-6224

  Hope this helps

• KB3075249, KB3080149 and KB3068708: they are really uninstalled?

  After learn today that Microsoft has decided to follow the users of Windows 7 and 8, how they are tracking Windows 10 users, I decided to uninstall the 3 updates that track.  I found in my history of update, clicked on "Install updates", found in this list, click on each one and uninstalled.

  When this was complete, I rebooted and went back into Windows update to see if they were offered to me even once so I could hide.  But they were not available.  So I rechecked my update history, and all three are still in the history.  But they are no longer in the list of "installed updates".  This means that they're really gone?

  I hope that update history still shows them because they are a part of history, but they are of installed updates, because they are installed is no longer.  Is this correct?

  I am running Windows 7 Professional SP1.  TIA for any help you can offer.

  Jane

  Hello Jane,.

  Thanks for posting your query on the Microsoft Community.

  To respond to your request, uninstalled updates will continue to display in the history of the update. If they are uninstalled they should not appear in the installed updates. As you mentioned that these numbers KB updates do not appear in the installed updates, they are completely uninstalled from your computer.

  Also, I would like to inform you that there is no monitoring Microsoft's plan. This information is incorrect. Windows updates are available only to keep your operating system up-to-date and secure. If you do not want a particular update to be installed on your computer you can hide, or if you do not want to upgrade your computer at all you can disable updates. It is entirely at your discretion. Microsoft has no control over the information on your computer.

  For more information: you can view Microsoft privacy policy statement.

  Microsoft privacy statement

  https://www.Microsoft.com/en-us/privacystatement/

  See also: Trustworthy Computing

  http://www.Microsoft.com/en-us/TWC/privacy/default.aspx

  Hope that answers your query. Write us back for any additional assistance with Windows, we will be happy to help you.

• E2 engine issue

  Dear Sir/Madam,

  I got four probes of Cisco IPS SSM-20. I'm running 6.0 (3) E1 and did not particularly want to spend 6.0 (4) due to the following:

  CSCsm60273 AIP - SSM rest in State does not respond after the start of ASA5500

  I have a number of downs to this year but he should continue to install updates of the signature, but cannot if I do not upgrade to 6.0 (4) E2 according to your comment below.

  WARNING: After releasing the E2, your sensors must be running release 7,0000 E2 or 4,0000 E2 in order to continue the installation of the updates of the signature.

  I'd rather stay on 6.0 (3) and upgrade to E2 (as this version is eligibale for upgrade of the engine) and wait for the caveat CSCsm60273 is resolved - hopefully in 5,0000 but I then won't be able to apply the signature updates.

  Please can you help me?

  Thanks in advance for your time.

  Rich,

  Understand that CSCsm60273 is not specific to 6.0 (4). It can also happen with the 6.0 (3) that you are already running and likely earlier versions as well.

  It will be also not fixed in 6.0 (5).

  Instead, it was determined to be a bug in the ASA/Rommon and not in the image of the IPS.

  It can be fixed in 6.0 (5) and instead needs a new ASA and/or Rommon to obtain the fix.

  If this bug does not affect your decision whether to move to 6.0 (4).

  Regarding E2 understand than 6.0 (3) is NOT eligible for upgrade to E2. E2 will be created only for 6.0 (4).

  6.0 eligibility (3) for E2 was missing at the end of April.

  Signature policy States "(b) Signature update support for service packs of software currently supported major and minor releases will be supported for at least sixty 60 days after the introduction of a new service pack."

  That's why 6.0 (3) has been fully supported the signature updates (and so engine updates) 60 days after 6.0 (4) published.

  6.0 (4) published at the end of February, so 6.0 (3) support was only guaranteed for 60 days and that was the end of April.

  Now in May is no longer a guarantee of support for signature (or updates to the engine) to 6.0 (3).

  As the E2 does not come you can always install updates of the E1 signature on any sensor E1 (including the 6.0 (3) E1). But when E2 is released it only supports 6.0 (4). It will not support 6.0 (3) because when E2 break it will have been more than 60 days since 6.0 (4) has been released.

  NOTE: E2 will also support the latest service pack on the train 5.1 which is 5.1 7.

• Config of ASA 8.3 NAT pre then no. - NAT

  Hello

  I'm trying to set up a VPN S2S on a SAA V8.0.

  I want NAT 10.1.1.1 20.2.2.2 (as a result of conflict of IP address to the other side) then exempt from NAT cela on the remote VPN to the subnet of 30.3.3.3

  10.1.1.1 is based on the 'inside' interface, the cryptomap VPN is configured and applied to 'outside' interface.

  The ACL Crypto is:

  VPN line 1 permit access list extended ip 10.1.1.1 host 30.3.3.3

  (1) am not familiar with pre 8.3 config, only used 8.4 + in the past, can someone please send the config that NAT / No. - NAT will be.

  (2) in the ACL crypto you define real address (10.1.1.1) as the source or the Natt treat (20.2.2.2)?

  3) there is also an ACL on the external interface, you allow 30.3.3.3 (remote vpn) access to destination IP, the actual address (10.1.1.1) or the NATT (20.2.2.2) treat?

  Thank you!!

  It is not a double NAT.

  So 10.1.1.1 is simply translated to 20.2.2.2 when the destination IP address is 30.3.3.3.

  If this example is correct IE. your acl made reference to the real IP of 10.1.1.1 and 3.3.3.3 destination IP address.

  Then the static policy statement NAT uses 20.2.2.2 and refers to the acl.

  It is the NAT policy.

  Jon

• How IDS and IPS notify added new sound signatures?

  I was told that they do so by sending the email from some sort of mailing list.

  My questions are,

  1. is it any way, or the best way to do it?

  2. If the shipment is the only way, where can I join this mail list?

  Thank you

  Han

  Threat defense Bulletins can be found here.

  http://Tools.Cisco.com/Security/Center/bulletin.x?i=57

  To subscribe to the HTML version or the text in the list:

  To subscribe to the HTML version of the mailing list: send an email to [email protected] / * / with the subject "subscribe". (The content of the message does not matter). You will receive confirmation, instructions and a list policy statement.

  To subscribe to the version in plain text for the mailing list: send an email to [email protected] / * / with the subject "subscribe". (The content of the message does not matter). You will receive confirmation, instructions and a list policy statement.

  Please note that applications should be sent to [email protected] / * / or [email protected] / * / and not the list itself.

  Individuals must send messages from the account that will be subscribed to the list. We do not accept subscriptions for one account that are sent from a second account.

  Those wishing to subscribe to this mailing list may also send an e-mail message to [email protected] / * / requesting access.

• Public static political static NAT in conflict with NAT VPN

  I have a situation where I need to create a VPN site-to site between an ASA 5505 using IOS 7.2 and a Sonicwall NSA4500. The problem arises where the LAN behind the Cisco ASA has the same subnet an existing VPN currently created on the Sonicwall. Since the Sonicwall cannot have two VPN both run on the same subnet, the solution is to use policy NAT on the SAA as well as for the Sonicwall, the new VPN seems to have a different subnet.

  The current subnet behind the ASA is 192.168.10.0/24 (The Sonicwall already has a private network virtual created for another customer with the same subnet). I try to translate it to 192.168.24.0/24. The peer LAN (behind the Sonicwall) is 10.159.0.0/24. The ASA relevant configuration is:

  interface Vlan1

  IP 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0

  access extensive list ip 192.168.24.0 outside_1_cryptomap allow 255.255.255.0 10.159.0.0 255.255.255.0

  list of access VPN extended permit ip 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.159.0.0 255.255.255.0

  public static 192.168.24.0 (inside, outside) - list of VPN access

  card crypto outside_map 1 match address outside_1_cryptomap

  In addition, there are other static NAT instructions and their associated ACLs that allow certain traffic through the firewall on the server, for example:

  public static tcp (indoor, outdoor) interface smtp SERVER smtp netmask 255.255.255.255

  The problem is this: when I enter the static strategy statement NAT, I get the message ' WARNING: real-address conflict with existing static "and then it refers to each of the static NAT statements reflecting the external address to the server. I've thought about it, and it seemed to me that the problem was that policy NAT statement must be the first statement of NAT (it is the last one) so that it is run first and all traffic destined to the VPN to the Sonicwall (destination 10.159.0.0/24) tunnel would be properly treated. If I left him as the last statement, then the other static NAT statements would prevent a part of the 10.159.0.0/24 network-bound traffic to be correctly routed through the VPN.

  So, I tried first to my stated policy NAT upward in the ASDM GUI interface. However, moving the declaration was not allowed. Then I tried to delete the five static NAT statements that point to the server (an example is above) and then recreate them, hoping that would then move up the policy statement NAT. This also failed.

  What Miss me?

  Hello

  I assumed that we could have changed the order of the 'static' , the original orders, but as it did not work for some reason any then it seems to me that you suggested or change, that I proposed should work.

  I guess that your purpose was to set up static political PAT for the VPN for some these services, then static PAT of public network access, then static NAT to policy for the rest of the network in-house.

  I guess you could choose any way seems best for you.

  Let me know if get you it working. I always find it strange that the original configuration did not work.

  Remember to mark a reply as the answer if it answered your question.

  Feel free to ask more if necessary

  -Jouni

• VPN Hub and Spoke with NAT

  Hello! I have a VPN network star topology, I need configuration for our customers to access. I have 3 points of endpoint in this example: VPN, Pix 515e and Linksys RV042 hub. The hub is the site of our parent company, the Pix 515e is our data center and the RV042 is at the customer's site. What I currently have is a VPN connection between our Pix 515e and the hub, and another between our Pix 515e and the RV042 VPN. What I need is for the server on the client (RV042) site to talk to the hub network via our Pix 515e. I also need to be coordinated traffic so it looks like it's from the same subnet on our Pix 515e to the hub.

  Hub (MEAN): 10.1.6.x

  PIX 515e (HUB): 172.16.3.x

  RV042 (SPOKEN): 192.168.71.x

  PIX 515e (HUB):

  Outside - 12.34.56.78

  Interior - 172.16.1.1

  Hub (TALK):

  Outside - 87.65.43.21

  Interior - 10.1.6.1

  RV042 (SPOKEN):

  Outside - 150.150.150.150

  Interior - 192.168.71.1

  The hub allows all traffic to my Pix 515e on subnet 172.16.3.x and vice versa. The RV042 allows all traffic from 172.16.3.x to talk to 192.168.71.x and vice versa. I need to get 192.168.71.5 on RV042 network 10.1.6.x the network hub through the Pix 515e and make it look like its 172.16.3.71 entry. So I need NAT traffic in the tunnel to another tunnel. Attached config running under the direction of privacy. Any help is greatly appreciated.

  On PIX you need a static policy statement,

  NAT list allowed access host ip 192.168.71.5 10.1.6.0 255.255.255.0

  public static 172.16.3.71 (external, outside) 192.168.71.5 nat access list

  And modify the ACL of appropriately crypto to include natted address.