Issues of multichannel policy parameters

Similar Questions

• Issue of group policy

  Is it possible to implement a group policy of global domain so that users cannot change their name to the machine, even if they are admins on their machine only?  Computers running Windows 7 or Mac OS 10.x

  Hello

  Thank you for details on the issue.

  If all the computers are connected to a domain network, then you can implement Group Policy.

  For further assistance in this matter, I would recommend posting your query in the TechNet forums.

  TechNet Forum
  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/Windows/en-us/home?category=w7itpro

  Thank you

• Multichannel policy statement

  Hello

  I use a script to get strategy multichannel for guests. What I need is a way so he could send me the report when it is in place. The problem is that it should report only on warehouses of data/hosts who do not conform.

  Example: (if we check for hosts who have a policy path defined as round robin report should have all the hosts that are against this rule - fixed/mru)

  $Hosts = get-Cluster cluster-name | Get-VMHost | Name sort

  {ForEach ($VMHost in $Hosts)

  $ScsiLunsInfo = $VMHost | Get-ScsiLun LunType - drive
  {ForEach ($ScsiLun to $ScsiLunsInfo)
  $PathPolicy = (get-ScsiLun CanonicalName - $ScsiLun - VmHost $VMHost). MultipathPolicy

  Logical #The is required in this case to display all hosts which have a policy of fixed/mru path. The format of CSV file should have something like "PathPolicy".

  "# of $ScsiLun on $VMHost is $PathPolicy.

  If ($PathPolicy - don't "RoundRobin") {}

  Export-csv "C:\somefile.csv".

  }}}

  THX,
  A

  This is the additional code, I wanted to say in my post in the previous post.

  One way to resolve this might be something like this

  $Report = @()
  
  $esx = Get-Cluster MyCluster | Get-VMHost| Sort Name ForEach ($VMHost in $esx) {
      $record = Get-ScsiLun -VmHost $VMHost -LunType disk |      where {$_.MultiPathPolicy -ne "RoundRobin"} |      select @{N="VMHost";E={$VMHost.Name}},CanonicalName,MultiPathPolicy    if($record){
        $Report += $record    }
  }
  if($Report){
    $Report | Export-Csv "C:\somefile.csv" -NoTypeInformation -UseCulture}
  

  In this case, there is no CSV file created when all LUNS have RoundRobin

• Issue of the POLICY of REMOVING ARCHIVELOG RMAN

  My Data Guard environment is configured for a single
  primary database to send to a single database pending ship with log archiving
  backups occur on the primary and standby mode. I have the primary removal
  strategy on POLICY of SUPPRESSION to SUPPORTED
  Up to 1 TIMES 'SBT_TAPE' and I would like to have the strategy set to standby
  Delete after 1 backup and the log has been applied, but it seems that I can
  set only one or the other. Is there a way to accomplish this policy?

  There may be a misunderstanding:

  CONFIGURE ARCHIVELOG DELETION POLICY...

  This is a retention policy. Nothing is deleted unless you tell RMAN to do. It is useful, for example, when you make an archvielog delete them all"" to avoid the archivelogs are deleted that must still be applied to the database pending or in have not been saved yet.

  If you want to delete all backups or archivelogs automatically, you can use FRA, which, as I replied to your previous thread, however only files if there is need disk space to continue.

• Issue of data policy drafting

  Hi, how can I apply for a policy of writing to multiple users, for example the code below

  DBMS_REDACT. () ADD_POLICY

  object_schema = > "TEST1."

  object_name = > "redacttest"

  column_name = > "credit_card"

  column_description = > 'credit card column can. "

  POLICY_NAME = > "redact_test_credit_comm"

  policy_description = > 'partially redacts the credit_card column. "

  function_type = > DBMS_REDACT. PARTIAL,

  function_parameters = > '9,1,6',

  expression = > 'SYS_CONTEXT ("USERENV", "SESSION_USER") = "TEST2" ');

  Like the code, I can only apply the strategy to use TEST2, how I apply this policy to user TEST2, TEST3, TEST4 and TEST5... so now

  Thank you

  DBMS_REDACT. () ADD_POLICY

  object_schema-online "TEST1."

  object_name-online "redacttest."

  column_name-online "credit_card"

  column_description-online "credit card column can."

  POLICY_NAME-online "redact_test_credit_comm."

  policy_description-online "partially redacts the credit_card column."

  function_type-online DBMS_REDACT. PARTIAL,

  function_parameters-online '9,1,6',

  expression => "SYS_CONTEXT ("USERENV","SESSION_USER") in ("TEST2","TEST3")");

• attestation / issue of access policy

  I created and access policy which gives access to a user in AD. No problem.
  Now, I created a certificate and a Manager click on 'rejects' for a user and that "repeals" the user to the AD and assigns "revoked" IOM. Now, if someone updates the record [or not] will give the strategy of access, and say that the user has access AD.
  In other words, are the access policy and attestation "Reject" is in contradiction with each other?
  
  Sunil

  I have not tested this specific case, but the behavior, I expect, is that rejection will remove the resource until something happens to the shape of the usr which will trigger a re-evaluation of the access policy which then will give the user the resource again.

  Creation of an architecture that suppors supply and application/attestation according to supply, often based on two rules becomes really complex.

  Best regards
  / Martin

• Event log issues...

  So im going through my event log to try to understand a blue screen I got recently, and I had a few questions about things I stumbled on in the case log...

  The first is what is IPSec and the IKE and AuthIP entered services modules strategy service agent?

  and on the other hand...

  "Security," it lists these "Audit success".

  In detail, it lists the user as "N/A"? Should I be worried?

  Hello

  Strategy IPSec IKE and AuthIP are all connected and used for internet security and computer security peer and authentication.
  The IKEEXT service hosts the Internet Key Exchange (IKE) and Authenticated Internet Protocol () AuthIP modules overlay. These input modules are used for authentication and key exchange in Internet Protocol security (IPsec). Stopping or disabling the IKEEXT service will disable IKE and AuthIP key with peer computers Exchange. IPsec is typically configured to use IKE and AuthIP; Therefore, stopping or disabling the IKEEXT service might cause IPsec to fail and compromise the security of the system. It is strongly recommended that you have the IKEEXT service operation.
  Internet Protocol security (IPsec) supports to the peer network level authentication, data origin authentication, data integrity, confidentiality (encryption) data and anti-replay protection.  This service apply IPsec policies created through the IP Security Policies snap-in or the command line tool "netsh ipsec '.  If you stop this service, you may experience network connectivity issues if your policy requires that connections use IPsec.  In addition, remote management of the firewall Windows is not available when the service is stopped.
  These two paragraphs were taken from descriptions of services of each of them.
  The system of audits to ensure that they work very well.
  You have run scans with your anti-virus or MSE?
  I hope this helps.
  Jim

• Secure Socket policy file problems

  OK, it's a little odd.  History: the site is internal - so rather than a second IP address to manage the socket connections, we use port 8088.  We also both a connection secured and unsecured.

  I wrote two simple java socket servers to meet the demands of policy file - insecurity on 843 and secure on 844.  The two seem to work as expected.  My logs show the request happens: 843 and the policy file is sent.  Connects also see the the request arrives: 844 and the policy file is sent.

  If I do not have a policy on 843 then the policy file on 844 is never read.

  So that security policy to read - I added this in one of the class files:

  Security.loadPolicyFile ("tlssocket://mydomain.com:844"); ")

  
  

  
  

  The policy file is the same for both.

  <? XML version = "1.0"? >

  <! DOCTYPE cross-domain-policy SYSTEM "/ xml/dtds/cross-domain-policy.dtd" > "".

  < cross-domain-policy >

  < site permitted-cross-domain-policies of control = "master only" / >

  "< allow-access-from domain =" "*" ports = "*" / >

  < / cross-domain-policy >

  The error being thrown suggests that, of course, the policy file is being played - however, it complains about the <>site-control tag and stops?

  Security Sandbox Violation

  Mydomain.com:8088 interrupted connection - not allowed to https:// mydomain.com/includes/myswf.swf?nocache=111115102420

  WARNING: Ignoring the tag < site-control > in the policy of tlssocket file: / /mydomain.com:844.  This tag is only allowed in the police files.

  Has anyone meet issues such as policy files course this portion?

  Yes, this article of server socket is not very useful.  In practice, many socket servers are customized or exclusive, so there is no convenient guide really useful to write on this front.

  Supported secure sockets becomes a little more complex, because some browsers (Chrome) have more complicated handles of hand than others for the TLS Protocol, so your server socket must be able to negotiate several styles of handshake, but is not a Flash issue by itself.

  Regarding making policies themselves, it's the best reference:

  File changes of strategy in Flash Player 9 and Flash Player 10 | Adobe Developer Connection

  This white paper offers a guide further on general policy files:

  White paper: Adobe Flash Player 10 security | Adobe Developer Connection

  In short, the master socket policy file must be served to 843.  This requirement exists, to prove that you administer the area.  All of this has to do is to serve this response, so you do not necessarily have something complex to make this work.

  The reasoning here (and it was all driven by abuse research and real world), it's that if any arbitrary port could set the policies for all ports on the field, which is very problematic, if for example, an attacker could exploit a weakness in a socket server which could then serve as the escalation of privileges to other services based on the socket running on many ports on the same domain.

  Master policy, you can set the capacity of the other ports to serve their own policies of port specific (although in practice, I can not think a good reason on top of my head), but you * have * to serve the master first.

  So, if you wanted to allow Flash to access port 844 on your domain, you would probably want to do something like this on port 843:

  At this point, if you need 844 to also serve a policy file to fine-tune the behavior of this port, and you have enabled it in the master served on 843 socket policy file, then we go to ask a second strategy of 844 file and analyze these guidelines as well.

  Also, if you want to argue that the port 844 SWF access request should be served to the client via HTTPS, then proceed as follows:

  Is not magically activate TLS on decision-making, but it make sure that the customer THAT SWF has been served safely to the customer.  (see, there no sense by encrypting the taking, if you can code MITM interacts with taking in the first place).

  If you want to establish the socket on a TLS connection, you must make the request from socket using the SecureSocket class, how I think asking 843 yet policy, but will fail if it cannot complete a TLS negotiation in this application (so the 843 and the target port should be able to handle the TLS negotiation for this area).

  Hope that helps to clarify things.

• See Multipathing policy

  
  How can I check the policy of Multipathing through all hosts on my cluster?

  Take a look at 3 Re: multichannel policy statement  

  Instead of making for all ESXi hosts in a cluster, you can just do a Get-VMHost to cover all ESXi hosts.
  

• The endangered network devices / system 58 with Net View error - something "randomly" seems to have occurred to my network 2-3 days ago

  I am running Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit on a Toshiba laptop computer on a network that also has a Synology Diskstation 710 +. There are other Windows 7 machines that continue to work perfectly with the NAS. My LAN is only small, so I run a working group called "WILF" owned computers and NAS.

  Until 2 days ago, everything worked perfectly and had been stable since the SIN happened more than six months ago. Then:
  -J' noticed that he was missing the NAS drive (which normally appears as "DISKSTATION" under "Network" in Windows Explorer).
  -Backup software was still able to access the drive normally.
  -I could manually create a connection to the drive in Windows Explorer by typing "\\DISKSTATION" into the address bar, which worked well.
  -Of course, I could ping the device, and I have confirmed that it is correctly in the my network router routing table. It has a static IP address in a reserved area.
  -L' other computer normally on the same LAN is a workstation running the same version of Windows, no problem.
  To try to find flaws, I went in the command and ran 'Net View'. The spokesperson system:
  "58 system error has occurred."
  I used the other workstation to confirm no problem with a network browser (in fact when writing the workstation is the master proposed stand-alone browser).
  Review of other forums, I saw references to Group Policy editing, etc. But (a) I already have pretty much everything these game settings they describe, but more to the point (b) I am a firm believer that computers do not start at random to behave differently, everything that happens all of a sudden started - network settings, group policy, IP addresses, the names of devices etc... None of this has changed. I find myself thinking that there cannot be a settings issue given that the parameters have been very well three days ago. However, there no obvious "triggering event" visible to me - so I wonder if a recent Microsoft patch (for example, a security patch) that auto-updated itself on my system has caused this.
  Any thoughts? Clearly, something went wrong, and I think even that relative layman I have to assume that low level network commands are not working is probably related to the fact that I can't see certain features in the Windows Explorer window.
  Help appreciated.
  Thank you.

  Hello

  Your question of Windows 7 is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the IT Pro TechNet public. Please post your question in the Technet forum. You can follow the link to your question:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/w7itpro

  Hope this information helps.

• 9.3.5 iOS iPhone 5s battery drain!

  Hello

  Having updated my iPhone to iOS 9.3.5 5s my battery lasts only 7 hours - and it is not left pending applications and use very little. My phone before the update took minimum 2 days with open applications and a lot of use. This update seems to be draining the battery at a ridiculous rate.

  Otherwise, anyone having this problem or knows if apple are aware of this problem? Are they highlight a new update for this problem?

  Thank you.

  Hello KWebby16,

  Thank you for using communities Support from Apple. I have a problem with your iPhone after an update is not what you expect. The steps and the following items will help to resolve your issue with the life of the battery on your iPhone:

  1. Firstly, restart the device as the closing down and starting process is important to keep the iOS software works correctly. Then test the issue and monitor the parameters > battery:

  Restart your iPhone, iPad or iPod touch

  2. then, setting parameters like background activity or rental and background as rental suggests this article and also check that you turn off Wi - Fi and Bluetooth when their use is not active:

  Batteries - maximize Performance - Apple

  See you soon!

• just your software uninstalled - don't want to support a business that trys to control the opinions of peoples - bye.

  Sorry to hear that a company with promise both looked to try to control thought and freedom of expression - here in the United States of America.

  Very disappointed - leaving your products to others.

  Hey again once, personally I agree with you that Mozilla should focus on a specific goal as advancing the State of the Web (openness, innovation and opportunity) that we can all unite around, any policies/religious/personal views we might argue otherwise.

  As I and most of the other AIDS in this forum are volunteers and other users of Firefox & mainly focused on technical support, maybe this isn't the best place to discuss the issues of organizational policy. If you are interested in pursuing the conversation, the governance of Mozilla mailing list at https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance would be the best place for your comments.

  Thank you!

• Configuration VPN FVS336G V3 FW 4.3.3 - 6:

  I just bought this firewall and I'm trying to configure a gateway VPN tunnel. I used the VPN Wizard and it worked well. However, when I try to change the 3DES, AES-256 encryption, it works very well for the IKE policy, but when I try to change the VPN policy encryption in the section Auto to AES - 256 policy setting, it says I need to configure some parameters of manual strategy before accepting my change. This seems not correct - I'm not trying to enter manual policy parameters. Is this a bug?

  JohnRo

  I reloaded the firmware, restore the default and restored the settings that I saved and VPN policy page seems to work fine now.

  Thank you!

  John

• Where is our 4.2.2 update?

  Let's see here, our tablets were more and yet the XTZ get 4.2.2?

  Of course, I guess I shouldn't wait for an answer to this question and many other issues, such as policy of Sony seems to be, 'buy our stuff at your own risk, we cannot guarantee that we will support you, after purchasing!

  Ok... Just check the 'Announcement' section and nothing there about 4.2!
  In fact, the latest announcement was 4 months ago!
  I sincerely believe that Sony is just wait there until the last guaranteed sold XTS is up, then they can sweep this whole mess under the rug!

• HP Mini 110 - question wireless WPA2-Enterprise

  Recently bought a HP Mini 110- 3098NR with the Atheros wireless card. It is currently running Windows 7 Starter edition, and whenever I try to connect to our wireless WPA2-Enterprise it does not connect. My HP 6930p connects fine to the same SSID with no problems.

  Anyone else have this problem or have a resolution?

  Found the issue... all parameters were an exact copy of my domain 6930p btu pc is where it was.

  Given that my netbook is not joined to the domain, I need to uncheck "automatically use the logon credentials.