my ram speed is too low

Similar Questions

• My internet speed is too low. How to increase internet speed?

  I use the broadband internet connection. I check my internet speed.
  My internet speed is too low. How to increase internet speed?

  Message was edited

  Hello

  : D you can not increase the speed of the internet!
  It depends on your internet service provider and only the ISP can increase!
  If you have some problems with the speed of data transfer, I recommend contacting your internet service provider!

  Good bye

• Windows Virtula memory minimum too low

  I get this error message - "virtual memory Minimum too low Windows - your system is low on virtual memory paging file. During this process, application memory for some applications may be denied. "I have read HP on how to reset virtual memory and did.  I market too low because when I open my browser sometimes it cannot open emails, etc.. I have a Compaq Presario SR2032X with memory 2 slots; 256 MB and 256 MB. I removed almost all of my files and put on a memory stick. I removed all the programs that I don't use.  Is it possible to remove the virtual memory paging file?  I wonder if I need to buy more memory so that will fix the problem. I would appreciate your help to solve this problem. Thank you.

  Hello

  What operating system is installed in your PC?

  For Vista:

  Right-click on MY computer, and then select advanced system settings.

  On the Advanced tab, select performance--> click the settings button and select adjust for best performance.

  Now select the tab advanced at the top.

  below, you will see virtual memory. Select Edit. Note the amount which is to the right of the recommended. Select custom size and put this number in size initial and maximum size, then together, then OK.

  Your PC must be restarted.  Later when the reboot is complete and you have logged in to windows, you should notice a faster response from your PC.

  Now in the start menu-> type %tmp% and select the temp folder. Inside the temp folder... Everything you can delete. It won't hurt a thing that all files are exactly what suggests the name of the folder.

  Temporary files serve no purpose after an installation of program/utility or surf the web for a month or two and should be removed from time to time through this method.

  Now you should have a faster desktop PC.

  Congratulations! Your have polished your desktop PC for the fastest possible response given the amount of RAM and video card is installed.

  You can improve even more as a result of the recommendation below.

  I recommend that you upgrade your RAM at least 2 GB of appropriate guaranteed compatible RAM memory important manufacturer (Kingston, Crucial, Geil, OCZ)

  When you upgrade the amount of physical RAM installed, you can go back to the advanced system settings and reselect the Performance, then select set to improve the appearance.

  Kind regards

  ERICO

• How can I get more memory? Should I go through Dell (it is a Dell computer)? I get the message too low virtual memory.

  I get the message "out of virtual memory"... In order to buy more memory, can I contact Dell for this (there is a Dell computer)?

  "Out of virtual memory" has nothing to do with the amount of physical RAM you have installed.  These errors are caused by incompatible programs, too little free capacity available on the hard drive, correctly configured virtual memory (you set it so Windows automatically manages) or sometimes even by a severely fragmented hard disk partition.

  Virtual memory in Windows Xp too low WARNING

  http://www.troublefixers.com/fix-virtual-memory-too-low-warning-trouble-in-Win-XP/

  TIPS COMPUTER virtual memory insufficient attention Trouble in win xp and vista

  http://www.tricksystem.com/2009/01/virtual-memory-too-low-warning-trouble.html

  But, if you decide you want to increase your RAM anyway, memory Crucial (www.crucial.com) website has a database to help find the right RAM for your specific brand and model computer or the motherboard.  (By the way, Crucial is the only company I have ever buy RAM.)  I've never been disappointed.)  And it will be significantly cheaper than buying at Dell.

• What can I do on my virtual memory is too low?

  Windows keep saying its increasin the memory, but 2nite the warnin says "no virtual memory!" Please sumone can help me

  Please provide additional information on your system:

  What is your system brand and model?

  What is your Version of XP and the Service Pack?

  Describe your current antivirus and software anti malware situation: McAfee, Symantec, Norton, Spybot, AVG, Avira!, Defender, ZoneAlarm, PC Tools, MSE, Comodo, etc..

  If you mean that you see a message like this:

  Virtual memory minimum too low: your system is low on virtual memory.  Windows is increasing the size of your virtual memory paging file.

  This means that Windows XP is to let you know that he does his work.  The message is not an error message - this is an informational message.

  If XP thinks that the size of the swap file (usually c:\pagefile.sys) is too small to accommodate your day-to-day transactions to happen on it to enlarge and display this message.

  Most of the time this means someone has been tampering with the swap file to try to solve another problem that usually has nothing to do with their paging file.

  To see what your current, make settings right click my computer, properties, advanced, Performance settings, Advanced tab change button, virtual memory.

  Unless learn you more about managing memory than Windows XP, you should let XP manage the size of your virtual memory paging file.

  The best setting for the size of the paging file is usually going to be:

  System managed size

  Windows XP will attempt to affect a swap file approximately 1.5 times the total amount of RAM installed on your system.  To manage the size of paging file Windows XP is enough for most configurations.

  If yours is not set to the size of the managed system, you must determine how it changed and why (usually a bad reason), take note of the current settings, change the size of the managed system setting, click define and apply the changes (you will be asked to restart).

  "Because someone told me to" is not a good reason to start just making adjustments to the size of pagefile.  You must understand and fix it well - not just trying things.  It may need adjustment, but you should at least try to know what you're doing and why you need to do it at all.

  After making the settings, restart, then check the paging file settings again to ensure that they stick, then retest your system and see if you still get the messages.

  If you still see the message, you must determine what applications you are running that consume a large part of the virtual memory that Windows XP keeps needing to adjust it.

  Some antivirus applications are known to consume large amounts of virtual memory (as the Teatimer from Spybot - do you have installed?).

  You can determine how the applications use virtual memory using the Task Manager.

  To do this:

  Click with the right button on the taskbar, choose Task Manager and select the processes tab.

  Click View, select column, check the box that says: virtual memory size.  Expand the height and the width of the Task Manager by dragging the edges to see if possible all the columns and the processes in a single window.

  Double click on a column heading in TM to sort the column.  For example, sort tasks in the column size CPU or virtual memory manager.

  Here's what my poor Task Manager looks like:

  http://img820.imageshack.us/img820/8817/taskmanagerk.PNG

  On your system, what are the processes on top using the more virtual memory?

  If you need another set of eyeballs on your parameters, describe the top 5 applications that see you in the Task Manager using virtual memory and then do this:

  Click Start, run and enter in the box:

  Msinfo32

  Click on OK and when the system info summary appears, click on Edition, select all, copy, and then paste the results here.

  There will be some personal information (such as the user name and the name of the system), and what appears to be personal information for you, simply delete the personal information of the pasted information.

  This minimize back Q & A and eliminate the guesswork and assumptions.

  Do, or do not. There is no test.

  I need YOUR voice and the points for helpful answers and propose responses. I'm saving for a pony!

• The volume on my MP3 player is too low after extraction and synchronization with windows media player. What can I do?

  I intend to play my MP3 in my car, but the volume is too low. I tried to adjust the volume on the car radio and the MP3 player, but the volume is still too low. I tore and synchronized through windows media player with MP3 and the speed of transmission of high-quality files. Also I tried to drag and drop in windows Explorer, but once again the volume is still too low.

  I tried also exactly the same with an IPOD shuffle, but again, the volume is too low.

  Try the steps in the article provided

  http://www.ehow.com/how_7464813_increase-DVD-rip-volume.html

• Is RAM speed issue?

  Introduction:

  Hello, I ran some tests today to see if RAM speed really makes a difference when it comes to After Effects. In short, my conclusion is that, no, it makes no difference. At least not for the type of project I tested it with. Here are my conclusions, but first of all, my system specs.

  System Specs:

  Intel Core i7 - 3930K (4.3 GHz OC) cooled water

  120 GB Sata II SSD for the OS and programs

  256 GB Sata III SSD for the files of project and after effects of Disk Cache

  16 GB (4x4Go) Corsair Vengeance RAM (hourly stock are 1600 MHz @ 8,8,8,24)

  1 GB Nvidia GTX 460 SE

  Test project:

  The project involved 6 AVCHD videos played simultaneously and a few very basic effects such as corner pinning and cc removal of thread. The after effects memory and multiprocessing settings were as follows. 5 GB reserved for other programs, 2 CPUs reserve for other programs, 2 GB by heart.

  Results:

  1333 MHz, 12, 12, 12, 24 @ 1.57V

  Render time: 03:22

  1333 MHz, 7, 7, 7-24 @ 1.6V

  Render time: 03:17

  1866 MHz 9, 9, 9, 24, @ 1.57V

  Make the timer 03:14

  1866 MHz, 12, 12, 12, 24 @ 1.57V

  Render time: 03:19

  2133, 12, 12, 12, 24 @ 1.6V

  Render time: 03:15

  Conclusion:

  So, in my tests, I found that RAM stpeed is not really play a big role in this situation. However, after thinking about this a bit, I realized that this is probably due to the fact that my RAM must load data from and data dump to my SSD in this project. Even if my SSD is able more 500 MB/s had R/W, it is still not even remotely near speed, were one of these RAM speeds.

  So my question to you all is then as follows, can you recommend a type of project with effects that will mainly use the RAM without having to access my SSD? While my tests show a good example of 'real world' of the effects of the speed of the RAM, they do not show the full picture. With your recommendations, I'll create a new project that will best contribute to the effects of the speed of the RAM and add these conclusions about it.

  Yes... just a little space to fit... you could literally get 8 + of my tricks inside of your and still have room.

  In any case, I did a few tests more and discovered more interesting things on the search for the best speed of RAM.

  Test project

  Just a rubix cube in rotation with 6 iterations of keylight to key of all colors. The AE memory and multiprocessing settings were as follows: 5 GB reserved for other programs, 2 CPUs for other programs, 2 GB by heart. See original post for the specifications of the system. NOTE: I increased the frequency breaks through a little following GHz 4,427 during this test.

  
  

  Results:

  NOTE: Purged of the means I have "purged all" immediately before you click the record button.
  

  24 999 1553 (32.839ns total latency)

  Purged of time 1: 03:37

  Time without purge 1: 03:15

  Time without purge 2: 03:22

  24 999 1864 (27.360ns total latency)

  Purged of time 1: 03:51

  Time without purge 1: 03:03

  Time without purge 2: 03:08

  Time served 2: 03:09

  22 999 1864 (26.287ns total latency)

  Purged of time 1: 03:41

  Time without purge 1: 03:08

  Time without purge 2: 03:07

  Time without purge 3: 02:48

  Time served 2: 03:12

  2174 12 12 12 24 (27.599ns total latency)

  Purged of time 1: 03:45

  Time without purge 1: 03:20

  Time without purge 2: 03:18

  Conclusion:

  These figures all seem to be pretty conclusive that the most important part for After Effects displays must have the total latency as low as possible. So if you're in the market for RAM, get some will give you the lowest total latency, even if it means the passage with the 1600 MHz RAM on the 2400 MHz RAM. The argument according to which the higher latency will consist in transfer rate does not appear to apply here. In fact, it makes sense because a single address in RAM should contain nearly 500 MB for just a difference of 8ns in total latency. (Actual capacity of a single address is probably considerably smaller than that. I sent an email to Corsair to know what the maximum capacity. I'll post here again if they ever come back to me). So in the example above, where cpachris can run either 1600 MHz to 24 777 or to 10,11,10,30 2133 MHz, it would be MUCH better off running at 1600 MHz.

  Other important details:

  Intel says that the speed of RAM they recommend is 1600 MHz (Haswell of 1866 MHz however). I think it's because the hearts intel (at least those I did research) have a clock (bclk) standard base of 100 MHz. everything is based on this bclk. Your CPU frequency is generated by multiplying the bclk by a number. So for 4.4 GHz would multiply you a bclk to 100 MHz by 44. Pretty simple. RAM has now (I think) a multiplier locked which has the value 8. 100 MHz x 8 = 800 MHz, multiplied by 2 for Double data rate (DDR), which means, gives you 1600 MHz. If you try to set your frequency high that WITHOUT changing the bclk then you RAM may very well be running at 1600 MHz, just with worst timings.

  Now, if you were to increase the bclk for 116.625 your RAM frequency would become 116.625 x 8 x 2 = 1866. The tests I ran support this. In the original post, I had my bclk of 100 MHz (RAM max of 1600 MHz frequency). This test showed that, if I went more than 1600 MHz there is no advantage. In the next round of tests, I tested only the values min and max for those who do not give a picture complete. In the last test I boosted my bclk to 116.5 who gave me a RAM of 116.5 x 8 x 2 = 1864 MHz frequency. It is at this frequency that I gave my best results. So, if you use valued at more than 1600 MHz of RAM I encourage you to try to increase your bclk to where it corresponds to the frequency of your RAM and then run tests to see if that makes a difference. I'll go back and try to run the same tests with 1600 MHz to see where that falls to help support or defeat my argument.

  If someone objects to my statements above, please comment and let me know why so we can understand this stuff. All my findings are based only on some readings I've done and what my test results show.

  EDIT:

  I just ran some tests more and got subsequent synchronizations during execution of 1600 MHz at the time 8,8,8,24.

  1st series of tests:

  1600-888-24 (latency total 30ns)

  Duration: 03:14

  2nd series of tests:

  1600-888-24 (latency total 30ns)

  Time:05:34

  The time difference between 1600 and 1866 enforcement was minimal. It was exactly the same time for the first test and the time of 1600 in 4 seconds slower than the calendar of 1866 came. Compare the differences to run the same tests AFTER increase the bclk and this discrepancy increases to 15 + seconds. (by only comparing tests performed to the highest cpu frequency because that plays a very important role in the performance).

• Impact of the RAM speeds on site/server

  Hi and welcome to the Finland!

  I am suppose to accuire new material and I don't know what is the most effective way to go.

  I have two options at hand: the R900 and Poweredge R710/R910.

  I just wonder, how much speed RAM (not the amount but the speed) affect a server that will host a website? The site/s is / are quite heavy and at least put a toll on the side of viewers of the performance, but since the R900 supports only 667 Mhz RAM, is really worth to at least double the budget and go for R710/910 supporting 1333 Mhz RAM?

  The speed of RAM affect a server that much?

  Overall the R900 would have a total of four 2, 94Ghz quad-cores and about 100 gigabytes of RAM, 15 k HARD drive of

  The R710/R910 would have about one-third less the CPU performance and about 50 gigs of RAM, you would be 1333 Mhz.

  Think you folks?

  This is an issue involving too variable. In the past, I've seen servers with slower speed ram perform easily out of servers with faster ram, in general, it is the reverse.

  «The R710/R910 would have about one-third less the CPU performance and about 50 gigs of RAM, you 1333 Mhz.»

  CPU speed trumps ram speed usually, especially 33% difference, even taking into account the web servers are mainly intensive reading.

  Not sure how much disk space you need, but if it's a reasonable amount I would look in SSDS for extreme drive speed. If no SSD, and if you have the resources, raid 10 is fast enough.

• My iPhone airpiece is too low

  my iPhone 6 more airpiece is too low despite being at maximum volume

  If you connect the headset with another device such as a computer is it the same problem?

  If you connect one headphone mini-jack 3.5 mm on the phone is it the same problem?

  If your problem is with the headset or the phone should answer these 2 questions

• resolution of the laptop too low for the new working version

  While the new version of firefox works a treat on my main computer, the maximum resolution of my computer laptop is1366X768 that is too low so that it can display correctly

  See this:
  https://support.Mozilla.com/en-us/KB/page+zoom

  The function Zoom of Page Firefox does a level of field by field to save the zoom level settings users's favorite, there is no default Page Zoom level setting in Firefox, as with some other browsers.

  Try the extension Default FullZoom Level:
  
  https://addons.Mozilla.org/en-us/Firefox/addon/6965

  Or the NoSquint extension:
  
  https://addons.Mozilla.org/en-us/Firefox/addon/2592/

• Satellite Pro M70-113: the modem speed is too slow

  Hello

  I have a satellite pro m70-113 laptop.
  The problem is that I am not able to web surf, when you are connected to the Toshiba software modem that is integrated, because the speed is too slow.
  Connecting about 40 Kbps, but I can't even open the yahoo site just because it's very slow. I mean it seems that there is no data transfer... I have to wait 5 min load yahoo.com!
  I tried uninstalling, reinstalling the drivers, but the problem is the same...

  And on the same telephone line, when I connect to the net on my desktop, I get a decent speed. If the problem is not telephone line or my ISP, but something on my laptop hardware modem, or its drivers.

  Please can someone help me...

  Thank you, hoping for an answer...

  Hello

  Please check the maximum speed of the port and set it to the maximum level. You can find it in the properties of the modem in Device Manager.

• Satellite L50 - A - headset volume is too low

  Windows 64-bit of 8.1

  The volume is too low when using a headset. I tried headphones and two different types of headphones on ear, both with no result. Office volume is set to maximum, as is iTunes and VLC.
  I also DTS enabled, which has stimulated a little volume, but it is still too quiet.

  Google search suggested the so-called "Compensation of volume" (playback devices > properties > improvements > Loudness equalization), which seems to be the generally accepted the problem solution, but that has not helped me at all.

  I am a student in music that makes a fair bit of audio processing for the good sound is important to me and it makes me crazy, does anyone have any suggestions?

  Thank you

  Eh, it's really hard to tell what the problem is here. As far as I know there is not much difference in how he works with internal or connected speakers earphones/headphones.

  I have two Toshiba laptops and there is absolutely no any kind of difference. When I change the sound level, it reacts as usual, regardless if headphones are connected or not.
  When you start some application open the volume mixer and check if the noise level is identical with a sound level for the speaker.

• The sound is too low on Satellite L650 - 10G

  My new L650 - 10G, running on Windows 7 64 bit, is disappointing. I can live with that, but what is a problem, is that the peak power is poor. In other words, the volume of the ridge is not strong enough. It's probably fixable, because I don't know that the speakers can produce at a higher level, even if they are not very good.

  I have the latest audio drivers. Any suggestions - outside the use of external speakers?
  Thank you.
  Andy

  > But even taking into account, of low quality speakers, sound production max is too low

  This is a typical problem for laptop speakers. Fortunately, my model is equipped with Harmon Kardon and the sound is impressive. For you, I would recommend to get the external speakers...

• Satellite A200 - 14 d - the internal microphone volume is too low

  Hello, I installed the latest version of bios and drivers, but the problem with the internal mic has not changed: the volume is too low (levels the MAX value)-> unusable.

  And when the AC is plugged in, a heavy background noise appears in the hip or trendy helmet speakers.
  In addition, in the mic plugged in too... :(

  Hello

  I found similar topic where the user called Andrej wrote:

  Try this please:
  1. the right of the mouse, click on its icon in the task bar choose sound option
  2. change in the recording tab
  3. mark the front mic and click Properties
  4. change in the last tab named advanced
  5. in exclusive mode, uncheck the box first one

  Please test now and give me some feedback.

• Volume too low check on iPad.

  I tried to record that I play on my electronic keyboard. The level of the microphone on my iPad 4 seems to be too low. There is no way to settle either. Even after put the volume of the keyboard to the max, and by setting the iPad on the speaker with the microphone down in the speaker, the recorded sound is extremely quiet. It is not a hardware problem since I can use FaceTime, Dictation or record audio with other applications without problem.

  I noticed a lot of comments in the app store to complain of the same show. It seems to be mostly from the iPads. There are people who specifically referred to problems with the iPad 4, iPad 2, iPad mini 2 and iPad Air. Some have said that they do not have the same problem when using their iPod Touch or iPhone 6. Any ideas or suggestions?

  I've seen several reports, that the problem has been resolved after updating to iOS 9.2.1.   Is this the version you are using on your iPad?