New OTA in Room 7 and 8 users

Similar Questions

• I have created a new domain with win2012r2 and created users. Add after the client in my area so that the newspaper with the user I get error below.

  Hello

  I have created a new domain with win2012r2 and created users. Add after the client in my area so that the newspaper with the user I get error below.

  "You cannot connect because the logon method, you use is not allowed on this computer, please, see your ad min for more information network"

  Please help me with that and I don't want to give permission to admin for all users group...

  Hello

  Post your question in the TechNet Server Forums, as your question kindly is beyond the scope of these Forums.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home?category=WindowsServer

  See you soon.

• I have a corrupt user profile. Windows XP. When I add a new can be the same, or should be different. And the user's profile should match the user ID?

  Corrupted user profile

  I have a corrupt user profile.  Windows XP. When I add a new can be the same, or should be different.  And the user's profile should match the user ID?

  If the profile has recently become corrupted, you can probably get the same user by performing a system restore operation:

  "Windows XP problems if your profile is corrupted"
    <>http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/326688 >

  Otherwise, you will need to create another user and copy your data.  The simplest procedure is here:

  "How to recover damaged Windows XP user profile"
    <>http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/555473 >

  HTH,
  JW

• Hello, I would like to take advantage of the promotions on Adobe Photoshop for a single user (valid until tomorrow), but I have two questions.  First of all, I intend to buy a new computer for a month and for the moment, I don't know if it will be

  Hello, I would like to take advantage of the promotions on Adobe Photoshop for a single user (valid until tomorrow), but I have two questions.  First of all, I intend to buy a new computer for a month and for the moment, I don't know if it will be a pc or a mac. Do I have to decide at the time of the purchase, what system I'll use?  Secondly, I also have a plan for about a month to open an individual company. If I buy the program as a person, could I then use it as a business?

  Creative cloud is cross-platform. Licensing is not serious. By definition, an "enterprise" might as well be a single person. It is totally irrelevant, as long as you purchase a full license appropriate regardless of any promotion.

  Mylenium

• Fields personalized rooms, just as for users?

  Hello

  I note for users, we can define custom UserManager, through fields, but not for rooms with RoomManager. (I checked RoomManager and RoomSettings).

  I would like to add a custom field, so I can set if the game started in the room or not, and if so, I'll not send all users.

  We can extend State room with custom maybe values?

  PS: It would also be nice to be able to retrieve a piece that has the custom property

  Post edited by: Mickey79

  One reason, you cannot simply create your own 'State' CollectionNode / node?

  Because it makes it easier to share the custom properties associated with all the users connected to a room (so that all users in a room can potentially display these additional properties), users have custom fields.

  For a room I don't see how making this feature available in RoomManager is more efficient to manage a collection node / node (except that you must create the new node in advance, but you can easily solve with a model of the House.

  In addition, what do you mean by "It would also be nice to be able to retrieve a piece that has the custom property". Are you thinking of some sort of query on all parts in your account for those who have this property (or the property set to true?). This is not possible from the persistent state room is stored as a BLOB that we do not know how.

  But you can use the server API to retrieve this property value for a particular room. For more, you need to keep that kind of information in a 'base', you keep.

• Device and the user does not add security to the family account

  First post.

  Win8 running on a laptop. He was previously a partner in a family safety account, that I had put in place. I removed the unit and the user to try to resolve a problem with a web page. However, the account will now add the user or the device back to when clicking on many user form accounts for managing issues online.

  Family safety account is under my email address. laptop user is my child, who is defined as a child with a separate e-mail account. The security account for the family is still working and control another portable under win7 under a separate connection.

  Help!

  I managed to solve my problem.

  I created a new administrator account on the laptop under different parents email address.

  Logged in under that account, I was able to edit on behalf of a child who then it adds the new parental control under the new e-mail address of the parent.

  Only problem I have now is a child under a security account for the parental family and one under the other, but I can live with that...

  Steve

• Remove temporary files from the local disk c/documents and settings/user/localsettings/temp name

  Remove temporary files from the local disk c/documents and settings/user/localsettings/temp name

  By definition, this folder should contain only the elements you don't need.  If I understand correctly, this temporary folder is a place where temporary files are stored during program facilities and the facilities.  However, I have seen references other sites to help saying some programs can store folders and files.

  I do my own temporary file elsewhere, name it accordingly and move all the files in the temp folder to the new folder. Use your computer normally for a while, and if nothing complains about missing files, you have a good indication that none of the moved files are important and should be safe to delete.

• I have problems keeping records and files of the administrator and the user separate in my laptop (HP Pavilion dv6700) under Windows Vista Home Premium.

  I have problems separating records and files of the administrator and the user. My computer is a laptop (HP Pavilion dv6700), used as a home computer only by myself, I like to keep the two distinct roles, but am unable to as Vista seems to be considered as one and the same. This scenario has arisen as follows:

  Initially, when I bought the laptop - approx. 18 months back - Windows Vista Home Premium was preinstalled, with the name 'Administrator' as an administrator. To customize the operating system and to use safely, I installed a user 'Renault', as a Standard account user.

  After awhile, I changed the name of the Director of "Renault", for reasons I have can not remember now. This caused Vista to combine folders and files of the two "users" in one, I found difficult to deal with, that I could not operate my laptop as just a Standard user, but is still considered the "administrator." On the one hand, this greatly increased spam in my email accounts. So I tried to reset the name of the administrator as 'Administrator' itself and keep my user name as "Renault", as originally the case.  But Vista me has failed to create a new user under the name "Administrator". So I created a new user under the name "System administrator", with administrative privileges. This has been accepted by Vista.

  But I forgot to change the user account for 'Renault', on the Standard account, so there was BOTH administrator accounts at the same time on my laptop! I realized that now only. The net result was that all the files that I created under the system administrator user were still being displayed under the user account of Renault. A few days back, I realized this and tried to separate the files correctly, but it has not been possible. No matter what I copied the account of the user in the files under the system administrator account, the files have been copied on account of the user himself.

  I tried to fix this by changing the name of the user account in something very different, AND as a Standard user. but this also does not work, as all folders and files under the administrator account system shows it as being under the user account of "Renault" only!

  Then, I deleted the user 'Renault' from the list of the user, but he was not yet of any help. Whenever I tried to create a new file under the system administrator, Vista responds with the message, "C:\user\Rajaram folder is not present. Will I create a new? ", which defeat the same purpose of my tent to isolate the administrator account and the user account.
  
  SOMEONE HELP ME PLEASE WITH A SOLUTION, - OTHER THAN REFORMATTING MY C:\ DISK AND REINSTALL VISTA AGAIN - TO GET OUT OF THIS MESS, IT SEEMS TO ME YOU HAVE CREATED AND HELP ME TO HAVE AN ADMINISTRATOR ACCOUNT AND OTHER UNIQUE STANDARD USER ACCOUNTS PROPERLY ISOLATED.

  I would be always grateful for a quick and helpful response.
  Thanks in advance.

  -RAJARAM77
   
  Thanks for your reply. It was very helpful / sorry your proposed solution has not solved my problem. Kind regards. -Rajaram77

  Better to delete the user account except the one that was built in the administrator account that you renamed. Before this backup all your data files of these user accounts.
  Then rename the buil into account administrator as 'administrator '. Then you create another administrator account and use it and never the user built in Administrator account and leave it alone.

• Not able to open a session in Windows 7 message service user profile service does not logon and the user profile cannot be loaded

  the user profile service service has no logon and the user profile cannot be loaded. IAM not able to switch on the laptop. How to solve this problem?
  My laptop is Sony's new Vaio. Windows7. 4 GB of ram and 2.1 billion hertz processor with dual-core

  Hi ravichandrans36,

  Thank you for using Microsoft Windows forum.

  This error can occur if the group policy setting "do not connect to users with temporary profiles" is configured.

  To resolve this issue, follow these steps:

  1 delete the profile by using the computer properties dialog box. To do this, follow these steps:

  a. Click Start, right-click computer and then click Properties.
  b. click on change settings.
  c. in the System Properties dialog box, click the Advanced tab.
  d. under user profiles, click settings.
  e. in the user profiles dialog box, select the profile you want to delete, click on remove and then click OK.
   
  2. Click Start, type regedit in the start search box and then press ENTER.

  3. Locate, and then expand the following registry subkey:
  HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\ProfileList

  4 right-click the SID that you want to delete and then click on remove.

  5 log on to the computer and create a new profile.

  For more information, see: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/947215

  EDITING REGISTRY WARNING:
  Important:   This section, method, or task contains steps that tell you how to modify the registry. However, serious problems can occur if you modify the registry incorrectly. Therefore, make sure that you proceed with caution. For added protection, back up the registry before you edit it. Then you can restore the registry if a problem occurs. For more information about how to back up and restore the registry, click on the number below to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:
  How to back up and restore the registry in Windows: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/322756

  Kind regards
  Aziz Nadeem - Microsoft Support

• BlackBerry smartphones where can suggest us new things for Yahoo Messenger and other RIM IM clients?

  I just downloaded the new version of Yahoo Messenger and I like the user interface. But whenever a new version comes out, this application creates a less complete story of contact behavior. There are several versions the contact's status appeared in the open conversation, as well as of the timestamp, the date on which the status. This includes Idle and Custom state changes. Who has disappeared. In the latest version, we could see the time the contact signed in or out last and sometimes both. Now they are gone as soon as you close the conversation.

  The idea of having Yahoo until on the BlackBerry all the time, it's that you don't have to be staring at the screen all the time, you should be able to come out of your pocket and find the events that took place that does not trigger alarms. I would like to that story all contact to be there, as long as I want to keep active. How can I make this suggestion to RIM for the next version of Yahoo Messenger? Thank you.

  Alternatively, you can send your suggestions to [email protected]

• I have a problem with the guest account, defined as the administrator and other users as standard.

  Original title: "Guest account" is defined as an administrator and other users are standard. Unable to create new accounts or edit the ranks.

  Hello.
  I have a Dell INSPIRON 1545
  Windows 7 Home Premium

  Somehow my "guest" account that you can toggle is administrator.
  my other 'Ordinary' user is a standard user and I can't do the promotion.
  Because this "guest" account is Administrator I can't ' create new accounts / change accounts / disable comments / CMD refuse orders. "
  "I don't have the"windows drive"so there is no need to restore my windows / safe mode does not help either.

  I read a thousand threats and issues on this topic but nothing helped me.

  Help, please!

  to be honest I don't know if the administrator account is enabled.

  You have fallen into a popular trap, the trap of not plan and create an alternative emergency admin account, even if you have a spare emergency House key. It's now cause you a lot of grief. If the problem occurred recently, then you can resolve as follows:

  1. Use your repair Windows CD to start the machine in Repair Mode.
  2. Invoke the system restore to configure Windows to a point before the problem occurred.
  3. Plan in advance and create, test, and document this absolutely essential spare admin account.

  If this does not work then send me a note (pegasusDOTfnlATgmailDOTcom).

• Why do we establish oinstall under the main group of oracle and grid users?

  IM and RDBMS version: 11.2.0.4

  Platform: RHEL/OL 6.5

  Why do we set oinstall under the main group for OS proprietary oracle software and grid?

  I would say "The Central stock" is the watchword here.

  orainstall is actually called the "oraInventory group." Member of (oracle and grid) users who belong to this group must read, write and execute privileges on the directory Central inventory which will serve as a catalogue of all oracle related software installed on the server. Whenever users put oracle or grid to level, the patches from the software they own, they should be able to update the respective news in this catalogue.

• Can I re-download Adobe XI to a new PC under my purchase and the original serial numbers?

  Please help me how to re - download Adobe XI to a new PC with the purchase and the original subscription? I'm still the original user, but have updated my PC.

  Download and Installation Help-

  https://helpx.Adobe.com/download-install.html

  Acrobat XI, X - http://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/kb/acrobat-downloads.html

• Is it possible to synchronize the SFDC and Eloqua users?

  I know that I can create an automatic synchronization to download SFDC users; However, it is not a user Table in Eloqua (Eloqua customer s US have access, in any case). I guess it's impossible?

  This would be really useful for the creation of new sellers in Eloqua on the fly, their updating, deletion, when they left, etc.. With Salesforce.com being the registration system, this reduce manual processes, clean the data and effectively enable and disable users. Still, this would allow Signature rules for customization of Email to bring more quickly.

  We are of course we can not synchronize users? I created in an AutoSync yesterday and noticed the ability to import into a table "users" Eloqua. Here's the Eloqua dashboards and not Salesforce ones (Contact, company, Outlook, data cards, etc.). See the screenshot below...

  

• Separate authentication for external and internal users?

  Hello
  
  Asked me to come with a CEP for a client who wants a new system APEX is accessible to internal and external users. The client security team want to have two separate copies of the request for the APEX and both copies of the auditor of the APEX on separate databases on two separate servers from Weblogic to support different security requirements for both internal and external users. I don't think that is necessary as APEX should be able to impose conditions depending on what type of user is connected, by questioning the cookie passed in which could contain a flag to say whether the user is internally and externally. In addition, CAE can be used to further restrict external access.
  
  The middleware for the customer solution is managed by a third party, who have made the following recommendations:
  
  The domestic channel requires SSO to configure on WebLogic while the outside lane. Internal users must be validated on Active Directory, with RSA Authentication Manager used for external users. We cannot set up a listener APEX instance to use and not to use SINGLE sign-on at the same time. Two applications are necessary.
  
  Now, I understand from my understanding limited the listener of the APEX, it is possible to implement different rules depending on the type of user to access. However, might just as well not be managed from Magnatune APEX? We could write a custom authentication procedure that verifies again road and the SSO user authentication cookie or otherwise, as required.
  
  So my question is this: can it really be necessary to implement two versions of an APEX application, with two distinct on different servers APEX headphones, to meet the security requirements of separate here? Ultimately at the end of the day if that's what the customer wants, we have to build it, but I'm looking to reassure them via a CEP that won't be necessary. I think that the seller of hardware/middleware recommend that the client just because they do not know available in APEX itself custom authentication options.
  
  Please forgive any simplifications or the lack of details in the above - I'm more a developer APEX as a person of the infrastructure and a bit of a 'newbie' where the listener APEX is concerned. All advice gratefully appreciated!
  
  Graham.

  Hi Graham,

  It's a matter of people paranoid how and to what extent they trust their own infrastructure. Things could be easier than to split the environments, but I don't know if I just depends on the cookie because cookie can be easily rigged. But I think that the following architecture would be safe:
  1 internal users connect APEX listener somehow security team requires, come to APEX and maybe be identified using the internal IP address (range). To simulate the INVESTIGATION period should be difficult for external users.
  2. external users connect APEX listener through a defined gateway, preferably a proxy. All future requests through this gateway would be considered external users.
  You may add additional logic to the proxy, for example use something like 'mod_headers' in Apache HTTPD to add a page header to requests, so that you may identify as external users.
  You could, of course, also put it the other Tower and allow internal users to use some proxy to enforce certain rules of IP based address, or perhaps a few additional references as authentication for access to the proxy (which again could be transparent user in AD-configuration, at least if you stick with IE).

  You can easily implement the separation in your custom authentication process. But this architecture also allows some other compromise: even if someone does not trust your application logic to handle two types of application successfully, you can also use the proxy to enforce the specific call for an application id. Certainly you don't need to duplicate the infrastructure...
  Most of the companies already have a proxy for external users, for example to activate SSL and to hide other internal resources, for load balancing,... so I think you just need to put some configuration of the existing infrastructure and end up needing no component additional. Even if there is no proxy and yet, it would be an element of very light weight, easy to handle.

  So far, all this has nothing to do with the earpiece of the APEX. It's 'just' a web front-end for the instance of the APEX in the database. I wouldn't put a logic of network security in this service, but the split things upward front. The APEX listener can be patched to add some logic, but which was not supported.

  I think that this would work and should be sufficient for most of the safety requirements.
  If my picture was not painted understandable, let me know.

  -Udo