ORA-01733 on update of version (view) table join

Similar Questions

• MV incremental update on remote database table join query

  Hello
  
  I am creating a MV with incremental refresh option on a join query with 2 tables of database remote.
  
  Created journals of MV on 2 tables in the remote database.
  DROP MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON emp;
  CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON emp WITH ROWID;
  DROP MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON dept;
  CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON WITH ROWID dept;
  
  Now, try to create the MV,
  
  Mv_emp_dept CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW
  IMMEDIATE CONSTRUCTION
  REFRESH QUICKLY
  START BY SYSDATE
  1 /(24*15) NEXT SYSDATE+.
  WITH THE PRIMARY KEY
  AS
  SELECT e.ename, e.job, d.dname FROM emp@remote_db e, dept@remote_db d
  WHERE e.deptno = d.deptno
  AND e.sal > 800;
  
  Get the error ORA-12052.
  
  Can you please help me.
  
  Thank you
  Anjan

  Need to include the ROWID in the mview. Should be something like: -.

  CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW mv_emp_dept
  BUILD IMMEDIATE
  REFRESH FAST
  AS
  SELECT e.rowid rowide, e.ename, e.job, d.rowid rowidd, d.dname
  FROM emp@remote_db e,dept@remote_db d
  WHERE e.deptno=d.deptno
  AND e.sal>800;
  

• ORA-01733-virtual column not allowed here - insert using inline view

  Does anyone know why I get ORA-01733-virtual column not allowed here
  
  SQL > select * from v version $;
  
  BANNER
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
  PL/SQL release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
  CORE 11.1.0.6.0 Production
  AMT for 32-bit Windows: Version 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
  NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
  
  
  
  -no error without the WITH CHECK option
  
  SQL > INSERT INTO
  2 (SELECT
  3 location_id,
  4 city
  5 l.country_id
  6 OF country c, localities, regions r l
  7 where l.country_id = c.country_id
  8 and c.region_id = r.region_id
  9 and r.region_name = 'Asia')
  10 VALUES (5500, 'Common Wansdworth', 'UK');
  
  1 line of creation.
  
  SQL > rollback;
  
  Complete restoration.
  
  
  -error with WITH CHECK OPTION
  
  
  SQL > INSERT INTO
  2 (SELECT
  3 location_id,
  4 city
  5 l.country_id
  6 OF country c, localities, regions r l
  7 where l.country_id = c.country_id
  8 and c.region_id = r.region_id
  9 and r.region_name = 'Asia' WITH CHECK OPTION)
  10 VALUES (5500, 'Common Wansdworth', 'UK');
  INSERT INTO
  *
  ERROR on line 1:
  ORA-01733: virtual column not allowed here
  
  
  
  
  I was expecting
  
  ORA-01402: discovers the violation of where WITH CHECK OPTION clause
  
  for the second. Am I missing here?

  Coskan wrote:
  Randolf

  Thanks a lot for the update of this old question
  After reading the link, I think I should ignore this error and accept him as ORA-01402

  The information that you have asked me to check me do not have an understanding of the different error types.

  Coskan,

  I didn't know this is an old thread that somehow got updated by someone else.

  Regarding your question: you're right that the output of the script is not really that useful.

  I have just run on 10.2.0.4 and in general, it seems that the output of USER_UPDATABLE_COLUMNS is incorrect regarding the views of join using the WITH CHECK OPTION.

  For example although the location_id from the TEST_V_2 column appears as non-editable (probably because of the rule that "the columns used in the join expression" cannot be modified in a join view when you use the WITH CHECK OPTION) I can run successfully your insert if statement I choose a location_id less than 2000.

  It seems that summed up the difference if you join more than two tables, you'll always get the error "ORA-01733" when you try to insert in the join with the enabled OPTION CHECK view. For example to add a third table TEST_V_2 which does not change the original view, but simply joined meaning for example COUNTRIES to LOCATIONS, will show the same behavior to throw an ORA-01733, however it works fine when the omission of the WITH CHECK OPTION.

  So overall, I tend to say it is really a limitation of the implementation and it is not actually an ORA-01402 but looks like Oracle is simply trying to tell you: Amendment No. INSERT in this possible view. Updates however seem to work, at least I can find some examples of work.

  There seems to be other restrictions of implementation with the WITH CHECK OPTION in place even when the only membership as two tables, for example when trying to join the COUNTRIES and PLACES but by selecting only in PLACES and by using a filter on the COUNTRY_ID predicate fails with ORA-01733 when this predicate is applied to the COUNTRY. COUNTRY_ID but it works if this predicate is applied to PLACES. COUNTRY_ID.

  I could imagine that Oracle has quietly added some of these restrictions with each patch set due to the angle of the case/adverse reactions encountered. I saw this for other features, too.

  Kind regards
  Randolf

  Oracle related blog stuff:
  http://Oracle-Randolf.blogspot.com/

  SQLTools ++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
  http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676 /.
  http://sourceforge.NET/projects/SQLT-pp/

• Update of a Base Table in a view with a UNPIVOT function.

  Hello
  I have a requirement to upgrade a Base Table in a view.
  This view has the query by using a function of the UNPIVOT operator to display the columns in the tables of the basic of the lines.
  I need to update/insert in / remove the Base Table by accessing the view (the user has access to the Base Table, so the DML on the view).
  
  Here is the table I created:-
  

  CREATE TABLE PERSON_DETAILS
  (
    PID            VARCHAR2(10 BYTE),
    FIRSTNAME      VARCHAR2(1000 BYTE),
    LASTNAME       VARCHAR2(1000 BYTE),
    PHONENUMBER    VARCHAR2(1000 BYTE),
    ADDRESS1       VARCHAR2(1000 BYTE),
    ADDRESS2       VARCHAR2(1000 BYTE),
    COUNTRY_CODE   VARCHAR2(1000 BYTE),
    LANGUAGE_CODE  VARCHAR2(1000 BYTE),
    EMAIL          VARCHAR2(1000 BYTE)
  )

  The sample values are inserted in this table using the script below: -.
  

  insert into person_details values ('1','XYZ','ABC','1234567890','India','Asia','IN','EN','[email protected]');
  insert into person_details values ('2','XYZ2','ABC2','1234567890','India','Asia','IN','EN','[email protected]');

  The code for the display is as below: -.
  

  CREATE OR REPLACE FORCE VIEW PERSON_DETAILS_VIEW
  (
     PID,
     CD_NAME,
     CD_VALUE
  )
  AS
     SELECT "PID", "CD_NAME", "CD_VALUE"
       FROM person_details UNPIVOT INCLUDE NULLS (cd_value
                           FOR cd_name
                           IN  (firstname AS 'First Name',
                               lastname AS 'Last Name',
                               phonenumber AS 'Phonenumber',
                               address1 AS 'address1',
                               address2 AS 'address2',
                               country_code AS 'Country Code',
                               language_code AS 'Language Code',
                               email AS 'Email') );

  Here are the values of the view:-
  

  PID CD_NAME         CD_VALUE
  1    First Name       XYZ
  1    Last Name       ABC
  1    Phonenumber  1234567890 
  1    address1         India
  1    address2         Asia
  1    Country Code   IN
  1    Language Code EN
  1    Email               [email protected]
  2    First Name       XYZ2
  2    Last Name       ABC2
  2    Phonenumber  1234567890
  2    address1         India
  2    address2         Asia  
  2    Country Code   IN
  2    Language Code EN
  2    Email               [email protected]

  The user would fire any statement as below: -.
  

  update person_details_view 
  set cd_value = 'US' where CD_NAME = 'IN'

  The statement above should update the PERSON_DETAILS database table.
  
  I understand that I can write an INSTEAD OF trigger, but I don't know what logic to write in the trigger so that the condition is met.
  
  My Version of Oracle
  

  Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
  PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
  CORE    11.1.0.7.0    Production
  TNS for Solaris: Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
  NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production

  Any help would be much appreciated.
  
  Thank you
  Ankit Khare.
  
  Published by: Ankit_Khare84 on June 28, 2012 14:47

  It is definitely possible with an INSTEAD of trigger.

  for example:

  create or replace
  TRIGGER ioft_person
  INSTEAD OF UPDATE
  ON person_details_view
  FOR EACH ROW
  declare
  firstname1  person_details.firstname%type;
  BEGIN
  
                SELECT firstname_new into firstname1
                FROM   (SELECT pid, cd_name, cd_value
                        FROM   
  
                            (
                                select * from person_details_view where (pid, cd_name) not in (select :new.pid, :new.cd_name from dual)
                                union all
                                select :new.pid, :new.cd_name, :new.cd_value from dual
                            )
  
                        )
                PIVOT  ( max(cd_value) AS new FOR (cd_name) IN
                                                        ('First Name' AS firstname,
                                                          'Last Name' as lastname,
                                                          'Phonenumber' as phonenumber,
                                                          'address1' as address1,
                                                          'address2' AS address2,
                                                          'Country Code' as country_code,
                                                          'Language Code' as language_code,
                                                          'Email' as email
                                                          )
                )  where pid = :old.pid;
  
    UPDATE person_details
    SET firstname = firstname1
    WHERE pid = :old.pid;
  END ioft_role_perm;
  

  and that run

  update person_details_view
  set cd_value = 'X|X' where cd_name = 'First Name' and pid=1
  

  The logic is: you need to convert back the view through swivel

• How to make an update of a view online two tables...

  When the unique constraint of the second table includes three columns?
  
  I have two tables A and B and I want to update a table column, one using an update of a view online two tables.
  
  Table A:
  col1 primary key
  col2
  
  Table B:
  col1 u1
  col2 u2
  COL3 u3
  COL4
  col5
  
  Table col1 primary key, table B has a unique constraint on col1, col2 and col3.
  
  Tables A and B are joined in this way:
  

  select  A.col1, A.col2 as KEY_OLD, B.col5 as KEY_NEW
  from    A, B
  where (B.col1 = 'literal_1') and (B.col2 = 'literal_2') and (A.col1 = B.col3) and (A.col2 = B.col4)

  And now, I want to update this view and set KEY_OLD = KEY_NEW.
  
  Because of the first three conditions in the where clause for each entry in the table A there is just a matching entry in the table B.
  So the table should be preserved in the join key.
  
  But during the update
  

  update (select  A.col1, A.col2 as KEY_OLD, B.col5 as KEY_NEW
              from    A, B
              where (B.col1 = 'literal_1') and (B.col2 = 'literal_2') and (A.col1 = B.col3) and (A.col2 = B.col4)
             )
  set     KEY_OLD = KEY_NEW;

  I get an error ORA-01779.
  
  I did the updates on inline views this way several times in recent weeks and it work very well.
  But so far the unique constraint on the table B was just a column ;-)
  
  So what I need is to make it work with the unique constraint on the application of the three-column table B.
  
  Thank you very much in advance for any help.
  
  Hartmut cordially

  Preserved key criteria must be met by the join columns, the optimizer does not agree (in fact I never tried in 11g) just a combination of columns, literals and join.

  The alternatives you have are subqueries online (which as you point out can do rather worse), the command MERGE or indicator BYPASS_UJVC semi undocumented.

• ORA-30506: triggers system cannot rely on tables or views

  Hai all,
  
  
  Why the b/m trigger fails with the error;
  
  create or replace trigger audit_ddl_trg after the ddl on the TABS
  *
  ERROR on line 1:
  ORA-30506: triggers system cannot rely on tables or views
  
  
  

  create or replace trigger audit_ddl_trg after ddl on TABS
  declare
    sql_text ora_name_list_t;
    stmt VARCHAR2(4000) := '';
    n number;
  begin
    if (ora_sysevent='TRUNCATE')
    then
      null;
    else
      n:=ora_sql_txt(sql_text);
      for i in 1..n
      loop
        stmt:=substr(stmt||sql_text(i),1,4000);
      end loop;
      insert into audit_ddl(d, osuser,current_user,host,terminal,owner,type,name,sysevent,sql_txt)
      values(
        sysdate,
        sys_context('USERENV','OS_USER') ,
        sys_context('USERENV','CURRENT_USER') ,
        sys_context('USERENV','HOST') ,
        sys_context('USERENV','TERMINAL') ,
        ora_dict_obj_owner,
        ora_dict_obj_type,
        ora_dict_obj_name,
        ora_sysevent,
        stmt
      );
    end if;
  end;

  Thank you
  Kai

  Kai,

  check this Doc ID metalink note: 107481.1 for the possible resolution, if not, see after outbreak of the sample

  CREATE OR REPLACE Trigger test
   AFTER LOGON
   ON SCOTT.SCHEMA  <==== The corrected line.
   BEGIN
    NULL;
   END;
  

  Concerning

• update multiple columns in table B of table based on the corresponding pass.

  Hello
  
  Will have two tables as below,
  

  create table billing_info 
  (MS number,
  RT_ID number,
  BILL_NO number)
  
  create table mu 
  (MS number,
  RT_ID number,
  BILL_NO number)
  
  insert into billing_info (MS,RT_ID,BILL_NO) values (1,99,635);
  insert into billing_info (MS,RT_ID,BILL_NO) values (2,99,635);
  insert into billing_info (MS,RT_ID,BILL_NO) values (3,999,1635);
  insert into billing_info (MS,RT_ID,BILL_NO) values (4,599,7635);
  
  insert into mu(MS) values (1);
  insert into mu(MS) values (2);
  insert into mu(MS) values (3);
  insert into mu(MS) values (4);

  Here the table mu got nullability for columns RT_ID, BILL_NO. I need to update this coulmns in the mu of table with the RT_ID, BILL_NO of billing_info of table corresponding to the value of MS.
  
  How to on this subject.
  
  I tried the follwing examples
  
  http://asktom.Oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0:P11_QUESTION_ID:43440209618042
  
  and
  
  http://decipherinfosys.WordPress.com/2007/01/31/update-data-in-one-table-with-data-from-another-table/
  
  but without hope...
  
  It throws errors like ora-01779...

  UPDATE mu
     SET rt_id = (
        SELECT rt_id
          FROM billing_info
         WHERE billing_info.ms = mu.ms )
   WHERE EXISTS (
        SELECT 1
          FROM billing_info
         WHERE billing_info.ms = mu.ms )
  

  updates all lines of MU with the RT_ID of the line in BILLING_INFO where there is a MS value assuming that such a line exists in BILLING_INFO. This assumes that MU is unique in both tables. If there are duplicates, you will need to explain how to know which line of BILLING_INFO corresponds to a particular line of MU.

  Of course, from the point of view of standardization, two tables with the same key and the same nonkey column should be extremely unusual.

  Justin

• ORA-12008: error path refresh materialized view

  Hello world
  
  I get a weird error when I try to do a quick refresh on my materialized view. My basic approach is simple, that I had a newspaper of MV on my fact table with all the columns required by the materialized view, sequence, including NEW rowid VALUES.
  
  I have my setup of materialized with a view my summary level, COUNT (*) and COUNT (EXP) for every SUM (EXP). I check the MV_CAPABILITIES_TABLE, and of course, it can be run with fast refresh. I have my fact table in the schema USER1 and my materialized in USER2 schema view.
  
  When I create the materialized view, there is no problem. If I immediately executes a fast refresh (EXEC DBMS_MVIEW. REFRESH ('MY_MV', 'F'); ), once again, no problem.
  
  However, if I run the ETLs that update the source fact table, and then I run the quick update again, I get ORA-120008.
  
  But if I do the exact same MV in the scheme of the User1, I have no problem making quick refreshes. What is happening with this? Is the owner of the table must be the one with the materialized view? User1 and USER2 are on the same PB and have the same table space. Should User2 also select additional subsidies on the source fact table? What I give to select on the MVIEW connect you somehow?
  
  Thanks for the help!
  
  -Joe

  The mview journal is a separate table. You must grant select, insert, update, delete on it to the user mview.

• ORA 01407 - cannot update column null - but I put as possible null

  Hi, I want to change the column datatype varchar2 to the number, but I have given in the column and I can not remove this column from table so I try this:

  change table tux

  Add subscribe_type_copy number (3);

  updated tux

  Set subscribe_type_copy = subscribe_type;

  change table tux

  change (subscribe_type, null);

  updated tux

  Set subscribe_type = null;

  -mistake here: ORA-01407: cannot update ("TUX". "" NOTIFY ". (' "SUBSCRIBE_TYPE") with the NULL value

  -- ? Why? I changed the column to accept NULL value

  -I want to do it now:

  change table tux

  Edit)

  subscribe_type number (3) - precision (total number of digits)

  );

  concerning

  What is FK or Pk?

  HTH - Antonio NAVARRO

• ORA-03134: connections to this version of the server are no longer supported in 11.2 to 9.2.0.8 database

  Hello

  I use the ODP.NET 11.2 (Oracle.DataAccess.dll 4.112.3.0) for .NET 4.5 (in Visual Studio 2012). I can connect to 11g databases but when trying to connect to 9.2.0.8 database, this error is thrown:

  ORA-03134: connections to this version of the server are no longer supported

  I do not understand why, like I could connect using Toad, but not a .NET application.

  Furthermore, I use Windows 7 64 bit.

  Any idea?

  Thanks in advance,

  Dave

  Hi Dave,.

  I see that you have version 12 of the supplier in the GAC (i.e. Version = 4.121.1.0). But only for the x 86 and you mentioned that you had Windows 7 64 bit. Your application is compiled as x 86, x 64 or Any CPU?

  You have confirmed that your application does not load this version? For example, because policy redirects in the GAC (such as Policy.4.112.Oracle.DataAccess, Version = 4.121.1.0).

  You can use a tool such as SysInternals Process Explorer or the Assembly Binding Log Viewer (i.e. the SDK fuslogvw) to confirm if necessary.

  It is true that version 12 would return ORA-3134 when you attempt to connect to a database of 9.2 because this combination is not supported.

  Thank you

  Mark

• ORA-12083: must use DROP MATERIALIZED VIEW to drop

  Hi all
  
  Oracle 10 g 2
  Solaris 10
  
  face below question... can't go below the user because of the MV... Please let me know how to delete user and MV...
  SQL > drop user cascade DW_USR;
  *
  ERROR on line 1:
  ORA-00604: an error has occurred at the SQL level 1 recursive
  ORA-12083: must use DROP MATERIALIZED VIEW to drop
  'DW_USR '. "" Dept_account_MV_M ".

  I tried as you said... .but no luck.
  .. is this a bug?

  I hope that's not a bug...

  I hope.. materialized view appears to be abandoned by the drop command but recreation fails because of some disctionary sys tables. the origin of the problem... it's suspicious only...

  check once... otherwise connect you SR with metalink...

• ORA-01731: definition of a circular view encountered

  Hello all;
  
  I created a view of table emp1.
  
  SQL > select view_name, text of dba_views where VIEW_NAME = "EMP1_VIEW";
  
  VIEW_NAME TEXT
  
  EMP1_VEW empid select ename, Dept. of emp1, qual
  where empid between 1000 and 1010
  
  Now, I tried to use create or replace option
  
  SQL > create or replace view emp1_view as
  * Select 2 * of emp1_view with read-only; *
  create or replace view emp1_view as
  *+
  ERROR on line 1:
  ORA-01731: definition of a circular view encountered
  
  
  In fact I want to read only view (emp1_view);  without doping.

  >
  Just tried this search in documentation and found this,
  >
  This article from doc talks about views of the object and does not apply to the example of PAHO.

  OP uses the SAME object (same name) in the CREATE VIEW as in the SELECT. This is the circular reference OPs.

  The views of the object identified in the doc never directly refer to the same object. Each object is a reference to the 'other' object and one of the objects is a view of the object.

• ORA-1653: impossible to extend the ABC table in tablespace APPS_TS_TX_DATA

  Facing problem
  ORA-1653: impossible to extend the ABC table in tablespace APPS_TS_TX_DATA
  Searched many forums but no specific update

  PL don't post duplicates - what table belong to which table

• Version Viewer in CS6 settings

  I just updated my V27 Viewer, but when I go to create a new folio it does not give me an option above 25. I use all the DPS tools updated for the latest version of CS6 V27. Has anyone encountered this problem? Is there a setting that needs to be changed?

  You may have to scroll to get to 27.

• need to update Adobe Content Viewer app

  Hello

  I'm trying to view my publication on the Adobe Content Viewer on iPad via

  (1) if creative cloud synchronization

  Then I get this message. However when I go to the App Store, it is said that all my applications are to this day.

  I deleted the Adobe Content Viewer application from my iPad and reinstalled. I still get the same message.

  

  (2) through Folio Builder Preview

  

  Can someone tell me how I can update my Adobe Viewer when the App store says there is no update available?

  There's nothing wrong with my App store app. I've already updated until other applications without problem.

  Thank you!

  You will have to wait for Apple to approve the new Viewer.

  In the meantime, you create as version 24 folios.

  Bob