ORA-12096: error in materialized view log

Similar Questions

• Bug: Cannot create materialized view log on XE 11 G

  Hello
  
  I connect as try and HR user create materialized view log

  CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON HR.EMPLOYEES;

  I get the error
  >
  Error from the 1 in the command line:
  CREATE LOG VIEW MATERIALIZED ON HUMAN RESOURCES. EMPLOYEES
  Error in the command line: 1 column: 0
  Error report:
  SQL error: ORA-00439: feature not enabled not: Advanced replication
  00439 00000 - "function not enabled: %s."
  * Cause: The specified feature is not enabled.
  * Action: Try not to use this feature.
  >
  
  You can create a materialized view log on 10G XE with no problems.
  
  Kind regards
  Jari
  
  http://dbswh.webhop.NET/dbswh/f?p=blog:Home:0

  Is this a bug in 11g or 10g?

  It was reported earlier in the beta forum now archived. {: identifier of the thread = 2214092}

  The current doc lists the MV sites only (and 'No' to the function of replication advanced):
  http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/E17781_01/license.112/e18068/TOC.htm#BABDFDAI

• The materialized view log and user...

  Hello
  Suppose a user, we will call him A has a table and another user B must create a log of materialized view on the table that a user has.
  While user B have all the privileges of object (direct priv insert, update, delete... not through a role) on the table to the user may not create a log of mv on this table on its schema...
  Thus, the insert/update/delete stmts on < table_name > are run successfully (after having logged on as user B).
  
  The error message ' ORA-00942: table or view does not exist ' appears when I run the command:
  Connect B/B;
  create log view materialized on table_name with sequence including new values;
  
  Note: I use ORADB 10.2.0.4 and it stands for table-name to user B (which tries to create the log of mv on)...
  
  The req. above is possible somehow?
  
  Thank you
  SIM

  The documentation says the following:

  The materialized view log is created in the same schema as the master of the target.

  HTH!

• create materialized view log on the table without a primary key

  Hi all

  CREATE TABLE client_months 
  (
    SUBJ_CODE         NUMBER(4),
    SERV_CODE         NUMBER(4),
    DEBIT_CODE        NUMBER(4),
    PERIOD_NUM        NUMBER(2),
    PERIOD_NAME       VARCHAR2(40 CHAR),
    FIRST_MON_DAY     DATE,
    LAST_MON_DAY      DATE,
    VALUE_MON_DAY     DATE,
    MONTHES           NUMBER(4,2),
    GARDENING_WEIGHT  NUMBER(5,4),
    REASON_CODE       NUMBER(5),
    STAMP_ACTION      VARCHAR2(1 CHAR),
    STAMP_CDATE       DATE                        DEFAULT SYSDATE,
    STAMP_DATE        DATE,
    STAMP_USER        VARCHAR2(15 CHAR),
    REGION_CODE       NUMBER(9)
  )
  table created.
  
  CREATE UNIQUE INDEX client_months_UK  ON client_months 
  (SUBJ_CODE, SERV_CODE, DEBIT_CODE, PERIOD_NUM, REGION_CODE)
  index created.
  
  CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON client_months with rowid;
  
  CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW client_months_mv 
  BUILD immediate 
  REFRESH FAST ON COMMIT 
  AS 
  SELECT * FROM client_months;
  
  ORA-12014: table 'CLIENT_MONTHS' does not contain a primary key constraint

  I don't want to refresh the mview when validation is performed on the base table.
  And I don't want to change the base table by adding a primary key.
  
  is it possible to create the mview journal using the unique index? or another solution?
  Please help
  Thanks in advance
  Naama

  Naamas wrote:
  No,
  I already read this post!

  Then you read wrong:

  SQL> CREATE TABLE client_months
    2  (
    3    SUBJ_CODE         NUMBER(4),
    4    SERV_CODE         NUMBER(4),
    5    DEBIT_CODE        NUMBER(4),
    6    PERIOD_NUM        NUMBER(2),
    7    PERIOD_NAME       VARCHAR2(40 CHAR),
    8    FIRST_MON_DAY     DATE,
    9    LAST_MON_DAY      DATE,
   10    VALUE_MON_DAY     DATE,
   11    MONTHES           NUMBER(4,2),
   12    GARDENING_WEIGHT  NUMBER(5,4),
   13    REASON_CODE       NUMBER(5),
   14    STAMP_ACTION      VARCHAR2(1 CHAR),
   15    STAMP_CDATE       DATE                        DEFAULT SYSDATE,
   16    STAMP_DATE        DATE,
   17    STAMP_USER        VARCHAR2(15 CHAR),
   18    REGION_CODE       NUMBER(9)
   19  )
   20  /
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX client_months_UK  ON client_months
    2  (SUBJ_CODE, SERV_CODE, DEBIT_CODE, PERIOD_NUM, REGION_CODE)
    3  /
  
  Index created.
  
  SQL> CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON client_months with rowid
    2  /
  
  Materialized view log created.
  
  SQL> CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW client_months_mv
    2  BUILD immediate
    3  REFRESH FAST WITH ROWID ON COMMIT -- pay attention to WITH ROWID
    4  AS
    5  SELECT * FROM client_months
    6  /
  
  Materialized view created.
  
  SQL>
  

  SY.

• MATERIALIZED View Log Index Tablespace

  Is anyone aware of the syntax or a framework to be able to specify the index of a materialized view of the journal storage space?

  We chunk our objects by tablespace - index, tables, CLOB.

  Creating a materialized view log and specifying the storage space in which it should be created created the mv log in the correct location, but the index that is created uses the default tablespace for the user.

  And Yes, I Googled it. LMGTFY

  create materialized view log on MY_TEST tablespace my_tablespace ;
  

  select table_name, tablespace_name
    from user_tables
   where table_name like 'MLOG%';
  

  TABLE-NAME	TABLESPACE_NAME
  MLOG$ _MY_TEST	MY_TABLESPACE

  select table_name, index_name, tablespace_name
    from user_indexes
   where table_name like 'MLOG%';
  

  TABLE-NAME	INDEX_NAME	TABLESPACE_NAME
  MLOG$ _MY_TEST	I_MLOG$ _MY_TEST	USERS

  I found these documents:

  Index on MLOG$ (materialized view Log): difference in behavior between 11.2.0.3 and 11.2.0.4 (Doc ID 1959657.1)

  Materialized View Log (Mlog$) Index not created in its default Tablespace (Doc ID 1959658.1)

  I guess you are running 11.2.0.4, right?

  In previous versions, no index has been created automatically for the journal of MV.

  Kind regards

  Bashar

• effect of pump or etl data on the materialized view logs

  Hi, we are mobile/upgrading an instance of 10g to 12 c, where one materialized view logs and expect to do one of the following:

  (1) extract/import the meta, only using data pump data and move data using an etl tool

  (2) comprehensive database extract/import using the data pump in

  are there questions that we must be aware of when the displacement of these with either scenario materialized view logs?

  Thanks for any information you can provide.

  > are there questions that we should be aware of when the displacement of these materialized view logs with either scenario?

  No problem

• Overhead of triggers VS materialized view log files

  If I need to log UPDTEs, insertions and deletions on a table - is there a difference in charge through newspapers vs MV triggers?
  
  Thank you

  You said that MV newspaper is slightly more effective than a trigger. I'm curious to know why. How they work differently under the hood?

  If the essence of the debate is only why MV newspaper is more effective than the trigger that I think that Justin has stressed that is below good technical points

  1. you don't have to order at the PL/SQL engine.
  2. you also write the binary data that you will put in the newspapers of recovery instead of column-level data.
  And below the text in the documentation:

  Trigger internal for the materialized view log

  When changes are made to the master table or master materialized with DML view, an internal trigger records information about the affected rows in the materialized view log. This information includes the values of the primary key, rowid, or id of the object or both, as well as the values for the other columns in the materialized view log. It is an intern AFTER trigger LINE that runs automatically when you create a journal of materialized to view table main target or master materialized view. It inserts a line in the materialized view log, whenever an INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE statement modifies data in the table. This trigger is always the last to fire.

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/B28359_01/server.111/b28326/repmview.htm#i30732

  3 trigger, i.e. we are coding for the track changes, newspaper MV i.e. tool/technology, which is provided by Oracle itself; So certainly "we are not that much able to write code that is equal to or better than the Oracle itself right?

  Feature of MV's trigger INSTEAD of, but under the hood, with close to internal components of Oracle.

  Concerning
  Girish Sharma

• Impact on performance at the addition of materialized view logs at the tables?

  I write a very complex query for a client of our database system transaction and this will require the creation of a materialized viewbecause, all attempts at development to make acceptable performance failed.
  
  I want to activate the fast refresh the MVIEW but I am confused about the consequences of the addition of the addition of materialized view logs to the base tables.
  
  Some tables are large and involved in a large number of transactions and I wonder if the INSERT/update performance will be seriously affected by the presence of a newspaper mview.
  
  Maybe it's a simple question, but I was unable to find an answer very clear in the literature.
  
  Thanks for all the answers!
  
  Chris Mills
  Biotechnology data management consultant

  There is an overload for the newspapers of the view materialized, a little less, but roughly on par with a trigger that writes to a table.

  If it is an OLTP system where you do a lot of low-value transactions, the general expenses percentage is probably not particularly great, something in the range of 5-10% maybe (although, of course, by running tests in the development environment would be desirable). If there are loads in bulk, the impact of the percentage could be higher.

  Justin

• ORA-12096 error in the log of the materialized on %s view. %s

  Hello
  I confronted the message special error 'error ORA-12096 in materialized view to connect... ". "When you try to insert it into a table. But... There is not a newspaper of view materialized (none in the current schema or the schema of other users).
  
  
  Note: I use OraDB10g v2
  
  Thank you.. .to much
  SIM

  SIM,
  There should be a mview newspaper that would create this error. This first success looking on google,
  http://www.orafaq.com/Forum/t/66160/0/
  Check 3 queries mentioned in there with mview and post comments. I hope that we would get little lead.
  See you soon
  Aman...

• Error ORA-01115 creating the materialized view

  Hi friends,

  When I create a materialized view it by throwing some error

  CREATE THE PNR_RES_MV MATERIALIZED VIEW
  TABLESPACE FAS
  NOCACHE
  LOGGING
  NOCOMPRESS
  NOPARALLEL
  IMMEDIATE CONSTRUCTION
  REFRESH THE STRENGTH TO DEMAND
  WITH THE PRIMARY KEY
  AS
  SELECT C_CREATION_DATE, C_PNR, B.CARRIER_CD1, B.CARRIER_CD2, B.CURRENT_STATUS_CD, A.CANCELLED_IND, A.BOOKING_OFFC_NMBR,-, B.LEG_NMBR, C_PAX_NMBR
  COUNT (CASE WHEN TRIM (B.CURRENT_STATUS_CD) = "HK" AND (TRIM (C_CHANGE_OR_CANCELL_IND) = "OR C_CHANGE_OR_CANCELL_IND IS NULL) THEN 1 OTHER TRAILING NULL) CONFIRMED_COUNT,.
  COUNT (CASE WHEN (B.CURRENT_STATUS_CD) TRIM = "HK" AND (TRIM (C_CHANGE_OR_CANCELL_IND) = "or C_CHANGE_OR_CANCELL_IND IS NULL) null THEN 1 OTHER END) cancELLED_COUNT
  OF PNR_RES_LEG_PAX_MV B, PNR_RES HAS
  WHERE A.PNR = B.PNR
  AND a.CREATION_DATE = b.CREATION_DATE
  - and A.BOOKING_OFFC_NMBR = '1F'
  - AND C_PNR = 'XE76V. '
  AND A.FILE_UPDATE_DATE. A.UPDATE_DATE IN (SELECT MAX (D.FILE_UPDATE_DATE |)) (UPDATE_DATE) OF PNR_RES D WHERE D.PNR = B.PNR AND D.CREATION_DATE = B.CREATION_DATE)
  GROUP OF C_CREATION_DATE, C_PNR, B.CARRIER_CD1, B.CARRIER_CD2, B.CURRENT_STATUS_CD, A.CANCELLED_IND, A.BOOKING_OFFC_NMBR;

  
  

  
  

  When executing it it gives this error

  
  

  ORA-01115: reading block IO file error 4 (block # 63757)
  ORA-01110: data file 4: ' D:\APP\IGT\ORADATA\ORCL\USERS01. DBF'
  ORA-27070: async read/write failed
  OSD-04006: ReadFile() failure, unable to read the file
  S/O-error: (27 OS) the drive cannot find the sector requested.

  
  

  
  

  And I checked through RMAN

  RMAN > validate the audit logic datafile 4;

  From post 11 March 14
  using the control file of the target instead of recovery catalog database
  allocated channel: ORA_DISK_1
  channel ORA_DISK_1: SID = 127 type device = DISK
  channel ORA_DISK_1: starting from the data file validation
  channel ORA_DISK_1: datafile (s) for specification validation
  Enter a number of file datafile = 00004 name = D:\APP\IGT\ORADATA\ORCL\USERS01. DBF
  RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
  RMAN-00569: = ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS =.
  RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
  RMAN-03009: failure to validate the command channel ORA_DISK_1 11/03/2014 13:0
  04:12
  ORA-19501: read error on the file 'D:\APP\IGT\ORADATA\ORCL\USERS01. DBF', block numbe
  r 63745 (block size = 8192)
  ORA-27070: async read/write failed
  OSD-04016: error queuing an asynchronous i/o request.
  S/O-error: (27 OS) the drive cannot find the sector requested.

  
  

  
  

  Please suggest me what to do it is a mistake to associate related database or OS. DB version is - 11 GR 2

  
  

  Kind regards

  
  

  Arya
  

  
  

  This is the error message that you should focus:

  > O/S-error: (27 OS) the drive cannot find the sector requested.

  Run disk checker utilities, eventually the file system is damaged.

  Hemant K Collette

• Create Materialized view and Materialized view log.

  I wanted to create a materialized view with option "REFRESH QUICKLY YOU COMMIT".

  (1) table 1 - it is partitioned range + list - added primary key

  (2) View1 - having primary keys on the base table of view

  Steps to follow:

  (1) create the materialized on Table1; view journal -primary key by default

  (2) create the materialized on view1 view log.  -It gives below error.

  ORA-00942: table or view does not exist

  I wanted to create Materialized view as below

  create a materialized view

  Quickly REFRESH ON validation

  as

  Select...

  ........

  ... from table1

  where c1 (select c1 from View1 which...);

  
  

  Question:

  (1) because I am getting above error when creating journal of MV on the view. Can one create log view MV or we create a MV newspaper on the base table of view?

  (2) to create the MV with "REFRESH QUICKLY YOU COMMIT' option, we need to have the primary key on the main tables?

  
  

  Pointers on this will be really useful.
  

  
  

  Thank you

  Prasad

  "When a materialized view is maintained by the ON COMMIT method, the time required to perform the validation can be slightly longer than usual." This is because the refresh operation is performed as part of the validation process. This is why this method may not be suitable if many users at the same time change the tables on which is based the materialized view. »

  See: basis of materialized views (refreshment options) for all the other options and how they work.

• ORA-12028: type of materialized view is not supported by the main site

  Hi guys!

  We face a problem these days about the materialized view.

  We have upgraded database version 9.2.0.7 directly to 10.2.0.5 (RHEL4 x 86) on the same host. Database uses the driver dg4odbc to connect with remote SQL Server 2012 through data binding called MIKSERI. Our developer team would like to have replicated SQL server table data side Oracle using the materialized view.

  They created Materialized view, but it is not at all to refresh the data. I tried to study a little bit, and whenever I try to change the view anyway I hit error:

  ORA-12028: view type is not supported by the master site materialized @ 'MIKSERI '.

  ORA-06512: at line 22

  I looked at the solutions proposed and discovered that it is maybe the compatible database parameter, so I changed from previous 9.2.0.0.0 to 10.2.0.1.0 but still no luck. Just to emphasize this database is of course different clone of production to a different database, with db name retained and other parameters, but on another host computer and listening port. I even try to change global name, but still no luck.

  Main problem is that refresh the work does not at all. To be more precise, we have created MV on the side of the Oracle and FULL Refresh should be done every 3 minutes. MV uses HS db link to the sql server database. During the creation of MV, we can see currently given to sql server, but the problem is that we cannot do MV to refresh every 3 minutes. When I try to change MV and put the refresh interval I get above error.

  Any kind of help would be greatly appreciated,

  Thank you

  I found the reason why my MV update jobs failed, job_queue_processes parameter was equal to 0. I change this setting and now works fine.

  Thank you for your time!

• Materialized view log table to clear

  Hello
  RDBMS: oracle 10.2.0.2
  
  I created the materialized with fast refresh view.
  Now as time passed, Mview journal tables grow much and more.
  
  I want to know, is it possible to shrink the Mview journal tables?
  
  Thank you
  Terranova

  read this link

  http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14227/rarmanmv.htm#sthref708
  

• Generate the ddl to create materialized view log...

  Hi gurus...
  
  Oracle db: 11g
  
  I am trying to generate / excerpt from script MVIEW Logs from prod to be applied on the test.
  I tried
  < code >
  DBMS_METADATA. GET_DDL (decode(object_type,'materialized_view_log'), object_name, owner)
  from dba_objects
  where owner = < ABC >;
  < code >
  
  above fails, any ideas?
  
  Thank you

  >
  Oracle db: 11g

  I am trying to generate / excerpt from script MVIEW Logs from prod to be applied on the test.
  I tried
  
dbms_metadata.get_ddl(decode(object_type,'materialized_view_log'), object_name, owner)
from dba_objects
where owner=;


  above fails, any ideas?
  >
  Please try to use the tags in code, but you need to add.

   on the line before and the line after your code instead of what you are using.
  
  The object type names are case-sensitive so you need to use
  

  DBMS_METADATA. GET_DDL ('MATERIALIZED_VIEW_LOG', object_name, owner)

  Why are you using DECODE?                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
  

• MATERIALIZED view log PPUR$ _

  Hello all;
  
  1. What is the purpose of PPUR$ _ ?
  

  Vs Mview unique Collection of Mview -when you perform a complete refresh

  -are all records deleted or truncated? -That one is true for both cases?
  
  Thank you...

  Case 1 (default) remove

  DBMS_MVIEW EXEC. REFRESH (LIST-ONLINE 'MV123' METHOD-ONLINE "C", ATOMIC_REFRESH => TRUE);

  Case 2 (default and faster) Truncate

  DBMS_MVIEW EXEC. REFRESH (LIST-ONLINE 'MV123' METHOD-ONLINE "C", ATOMIC_REFRESH-ONLINE FALSE);