ORA - 29857:Domain index and objects secondary exists in Tablespace

Similar Questions

• ORA-29861: area index is shown LOADING/FAILURE/UNUSABLE

  Hello friend
  
  
  I'm download the xml file in the users table, so why ORA-29861: area index is shown LOADING/FAILURE/UNUSABLE fire of error.
  
  
  
  
  Concerning
  
  Vikas

  link below might help you

  http://ORA-29861.ora-code.com/

  https://www-304.IBM.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21427516

  http://www.oracleerrorcodes.com/Oracle-database-error-code-ora-29861-domain-index-is-marked-loadingfailedunusable/

• Impdp ORA-39083 error: INDEX could not create with object type error:

  Hi Experts,

  I get the following error when importing schema HR after a fall it. The DB is r12.1.3 11.2.0.3 & ebs

  
  

  I did export with this command.

  patterns of HR/hr = hr = TEST_DIR dumpfile = HR.dmp logfile directory expdp = expdpHR.log statistics = none

  that the user HR with the option drop waterfall.

  
  

  And try to import it HR schemas in the database by the following.

  Impdp System/Manager schemas = hr = TEST_DIR dumpfile = HR.dmp logfile directory = expdpHR.log statistics = none

  Here is the error

  imported 'HR '. "" PQH_SS_PRINT_DATA "0 KB 0 rows

  ... imdoor 'HR '. "" PQH_TJR_SHADOW "0 KB 0 rows

  . . imported 'HR '. "" PQH_TXN_JOB_REQUIREMENTS "0 KB 0 rows

  . . imported 'HR '. "" PQH_WORKSHEET_BUDGET_SETS_EFC "0 KB 0 rows

  . . imported 'HR '. "" PQH_WORKSHEET_DETAILS_EFC "0 KB 0 rows

  . . imported 'HR '. "" PQH_WORKSHEET_PERIODS_EFC "0 KB 0 rows

  . . imported 'HR '. "" PQP_ALIEN_TRANSACTION_DATA "0 KB 0 rows

  . . imported 'HR '. "" PQP_ANALYZED_ALIEN_DATA "0 KB 0 rows

  . . imported 'HR '. "" PQP_ANALYZED_ALIEN_DETAILS "0 KB 0 rows

  . . imported 'HR '. "" PQP_EXCEPTION_REPORTS_EFC "0 KB 0 rows

  . . imported 'HR '. "" PQP_EXT_CROSS_PERSON_RECORDS "0 KB 0 rows

  . . imported 'HR '. "" PQP_FLXDU_FUNC_ATTRIBUTES "0 KB 0 rows

  . . imported 'HR '. "" PQP_FLXDU_XML_TAGS "0 KB 0 rows

  . . imported 'HR '. "" PQP_GAP_DURATION_SUMMARY "0 KB 0 rows

  . . imported 'HR '. "" PQP_PENSION_TYPES_F_EFC "0 KB 0 rows

  . . imported 'HR '. "" PQP_SERVICE_HISTORY_PERIODS "0 KB 0 rows

  . . imported 'HR '. "" PQP_VEHICLE_ALLOCATIONS_F_EFC "0 KB 0 rows

  . . imported 'HR '. "" PQP_VEHICLE_DETAILS_EFC "0 KB 0 rows

  . . imported 'HR '. "" PQP_VEHICLE_REPOSITORY_F_EFC "0 KB 0 rows

  . . imported 'HR '. "" PQP_VEH_ALLOC_EXTRA_INFO "0 KB 0 rows

  . . imported 'HR '. "" PQP_VEH_REPOS_EXTRA_INFO "0 KB 0 rows

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/SCHOLARSHIP/OWNER_GRANT/OBJECT_GRANT

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/SCHOLARSHIP/CROSS_SCHEMA/OBJECT_GRANT

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/COMMENT of treatment

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/PACKAGE/PACKAGE_SPEC of treatment

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/PACKAGE/COMPILE_PACKAGE/PACKAGE_SPEC/ALTER_PACKAGE_SPEC

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/INDEX/INDEX

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/INDEX/FUNCTIONAL_INDEX/INDEX

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/CONSTRAINT/treatment

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/INDEX/STATISTICS/INDEX_STATISTICS of treatment

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/INDEX/STATISTICS/FUNCTIONAL_INDEX/INDEX_STATISTICS

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/PACKAGE/PACKAGE_BODY of treatment

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/CONSTRAINT/REF_CONSTRAINT of treatment

  Object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/STATISTICS/TABLE_STATISTICS treatment

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/INDEX/DOMAIN_INDEX/INDEX

  ORA-39083: Type what INDEX failed to create object error:

  ORA-29855: an error has occurred in the execution of routine ODCIINDEXCREATE

  ORA-20000: Oracle text error:

  DRG-50857: error oracle in drvxtab.create_index_tables

  ORA-00959: tablespace "APPS_TS_TX_IDX_NEW" does not exist

  Because sql is:

  CREATE INDEXES ' HR'.»» IRC_POSTING_CON_TL_CTX' ON 'HR '. "" INDEXTYPE IRC_POSTING_CONTENTS_TL "("NAME") IS"CTXSYS. "' CONTEXT ' PARALLEL 1

  Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/POST_SCHEMA/PROCACT_SCHEMA

  Work 'SYSTEM '. "" SYS_IMPORT_SCHEMA_01 "completed with error (s 1) at 11:16:07

  SQL > select count (parameter), object_type from dba_objects where owner = 'HR' group by object_type.

  OBJECT_TYPE COUNT (OBJECT_NAME)

  ------------------ -------------------

  INDEX 37 PARTITION

  SEQUENCE OF 799

  TABLE 12 PARTITION

  LOB 70

  4 BODY PACKAGE

  PACKAGE OF 4

  3 RELAXATION

  2936 INDEX

  TABLE OF 1306

  Could you please suggest.

  Thank you

  MZ

  MZ,

  I get the following error when importing schema HR after a fall it. The DB is r12.1.3 11.2.0.3 & ebs

  
  

  Export and import of individual patterns of Oracle E-Business Suite stocked are not supported as this will violate referential integrity (except for custom schemas provided, you have no dependencies).

  Thank you

  Hussein

• (ORA-00955) conflict of naming for index and constraint when you use a unique index (.. desc,.. CSA)

  Hello

  indexes and constraints are in different namespaces, so it should be possible to give them the same name.

  In the following case that apparently does not work:
  

  create unique index orders_year_show_uq
    on orders (year desc, show_orders asc);
   
   alter table orders
    add constraint orders_year_show_uq unique (year, show_order);
  

  When I run these statement, I get a "SQL Error: ORA-00955: name is already used by an existing object". ""

  If I clean and I execute the same instructions as above with the only difference on the 2 line, using "asc year" instead of "year desc":

  
    on orders (year asc, show_orders asc);
  

  then it success.

  I can't explain it, you have an idea?

  Thanks in advance.

  Kind regards

  Giovanni

  First of all, you have show_orders in index and show_order in the constraint. I'll assume that it's a typo. Second, when you create constraint without index enhance the specification Oracle seeks indexes existing on the same set of columns in ascending order. If this index does not exist (and it's your case, since one of your columns to index is in descending order), Oracle tries to create one with the same name as the constraint. That's why you get ORA-00955: name is already used by an existing object. In general, you can specify explicitly the index name to force the Oracle by using the existing index. But it will not help you. If you issue

  ALTER table orders add unique constraint (year, show_orders) orders_year_show_uq using index orders_year_show_uq;

  You will get the ORA-14196: specified index cannot be used to apply the constraint.

  In any case, Oracle does not support using index DESC for PK/UK.

  SY.

• What happens to the existing after the partition of table index and created with local index

  Hi guys,.

  / / DESC part id name number, varchar2 (100), number of wage

  In an existing table PART I add 1 column DATASEQ MORE. I wonder the part of table based on dataseq.now, the table is created with this logic of partition

  create the part table partition (identification number, name varchar2 (100), number of salary, number DATASEQ) in list (dataseq) (values partition PART_INITIAL (1));

  Suggestionn necessary. given that the table is partitioned based on DATASEQ I wonder to add local indexes on dataseq. to dataseq, I have added a local index create index idx on share (dataseq) LOCAL; Now my question is, already, there are the existing index is the column ID and salary.

  (1) IDX for dataseq is created locally so that it will be partition on each partition on the main table. Please tell me what is happening to the index on the column ID and salary... it will create again in local?

  Please suggest

  S

  Hello

  first of all, in reality 'a partition table' means create a new table a migration of existing data it (although, theoretically, you can use dbms_redefinition to partition an existing table - however, it's just doing the same thing behind the scenes). This means that you also get to decide what to do with the index - index will be local, who will be global (you can also reassess some of existing indexes and decide that they are not really necessary).

  Second of all, the choice of the partitioning key seems weird. Partitioning is a data management technique more that anything else, in order to be eligible, you must find a good partitioning key. A column recently added, named "data_seq" is not a good candidate. Can you give us more details about this column and why it was chosen as a partitioning key?

  I suspect that the person who proposed this partitioning scheme made a huge mistake. A non-partitioned table is much better in all aspects (including the ease of management and performance) that divided one wrongly.

  Best regards

  Nikolai

• Find all the segments that belong to a DOMAIN index (effective)

  Hello

  I'm going through several diagrams to a different tablespace (because some objects have been created in wrong tablespace).

  Although this isn't a big deal index and ordinary table, I can't figure out how to find the segments that belong to a DOMAIN index to check whether they are in the good (or bad) tablespace.

  A select * from dba_indexes where index_type = 'DOMAIN' gives me these indexes.

  The only way to understand the corresponding segments for secondary objects seems to match the segment names. So if the index is the name of FOO_IDX, the segments would be DR$ FOO_IDX$ I, DR$ FOO_IDX$ K, DR$ FOO_IDX$ R and DR$ FOO_IDX$ N.

  What I currently have, is the following statement, but it takes forever (> 5 minutes) to find the clues of the field on the 'bad' even for just a single user tablespace:

  select *
  from dba_indexes idx
  where idx.owner = 'FOOBAR'
  and idx.index_type = 'DOMAIN'
  and exists (select 1 
              from dba_segments seg
              where regexp_replace(seg.segment_name, '^DR\$|\$[RIKN]$', '') = idx.index_name
                and seg.owner = idx.owner
                and seg.tablespace_name = 'WRONG_TBS'
                and seg.segment_type = 'TABLE');
  
  

  I can't find a system view, linking a segment to the 'owner' index directly without going back to the distortion of the name.

  It's my version of Oracle:

  Oracle Database 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64 bit Production

  PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production

  CORE 11.2.0.1.0 Production

  AMT for Linux: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production

  NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production

  Andrew, beautiful recoding of the SQL.

  casorp, how you looked at the content of the all_secondary_objects?  I think that this point of view has the information you want, but I don't have any domain defined index I can think to use as a check.

  - -

  HTH - Mark D Powell.

• ORA-01092: ORACLE instance is complete. Forced logoff ORA-00942: table or view does not exist on the 12 c CARS

  Hey Geeks,

  I met a problem when starting my 12 c RAC database.

  To mount it fine, but when I try to open, he throws me an error.

  System Global area 1.5400E + 10 bytes

  Bytes of size 4737560 fixed

  2952791528 variable size bytes

  1.2415E + 10 bytes database buffers

  Redo buffers 26857472 bytes

  Mounted database.

  SQL > alter database open;

  change the database open

  *

  ERROR on line 1:

  ORA-01092: ORACLE instance is complete. Disconnection forced

  ORA-00942: table or view does not exist

  Process ID: 11338068

  Session ID: 1429: No.3

  Here is the output of the trace file...

  ORACLE_HOME = / oracle_home/app/orahome

  Name of the system: AIX

  Name of the node: INS1

  Version: 1

  Version: 7

  Machine: 00C8CCA74C00

  Instance name: INST1

  Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1

  Oracle process number: 7

  The Unix process PID: 20381876, image: oracle@ins1 (TNS V1 - V3)

  2014-11-27 22:49:20.892

  SESSION ID: (197.5) 2014-11-27 22:49:20.892

  CUSTOMER ID :() 2014-11-27 22:49:20.892

  NAME OF THE SERVICE :() 2014-11-27 22:49:20.892

  NAME of the MODULE: (sqlplus@ins1 (TNS V1 - V3)) 22:49:20.892 2014-11-27

  ACTION NAME :() 2014-11-27 22:49:20.892

  2014-11-27 22:49:20.889716: start the recovery of field = 0, valid = 0, flags = 0 x 4

  2014-11-27 22:49:24.580

  Awarded with 32 slaves of recovery success

  With the help of 3 buffers overflow by slave of recovery

  2014-11-27 22:49:24.740

  1 post of thread: logseq 15, block 2, CHN 3510749

  cache-bass rba: logseq 15, block 3

  RBA on disk: logseq 15, block 72, RCS 3510824

  Start the recovery at logseq 15, block 3, Yvert 0

  2014-11-27 22:49:24.981

  Started the resilvering redo thread 1 seq 15 blocks 72-73

  2014-11-27 22:49:24.994

  Finished resilvering redo thread 1 seq 15

  2014-11-27 22:49:24.994

  Started writing zeroblks thread 1 seq 15 blocks 74-81

  2014-11-27 22:49:24.994

  Completed written zeroblks thread 1 seq 15

  = Redo read statistics for thread 1 =.

  Total physical reads (from disk and memory): 4096 KB

  -Redo read_disk - statistics

  Read rate (ASYNC): 35KO in 0,25 s = > 0.14 Mb / s

  Long: 0 Ko, moves: 0/104 (0%)

  Longer LWN: 2 k, moves: 0/33 (0%), moved: 0 MB

  Redo last scn: 0x0000.0035922b (3510827)

  ----------------------------------------------

  -Recovery Hash Table statistics

  Hash table buckets = 262144

  More long string hash = 1

  Hash string average = 25/25 = 1.0

  Max compares by lookup = 1

  AVG compares by lookup = 151/176 = 0.9

  ----------------------------------------------

  2014-11-27 22:49:25.007

  KCRA: start the debt for 25 blocks of data collection

  2014-11-27 22:49:25.039

  KCRA: treated blocks = 25/25, has claimed = 25, eliminated = 0

  2014-11-27 22:49:25.054

  Online Redo Log recovery: thread 1 mem Group 6 Seq 15 reading 0

  2014-11-27 22:49:25.060

  Ask again filled with 0.02 MB

  2014-11-27 22:49:25.235

  Control of completed recovery point

  -Recovery Hash Table statistics

  Hash table buckets = 262144

  More long string hash = 1

  Hash string average = 25/25 = 1.0

  Max compares by lookup = 1

  AVG compares by lookup = 176/176 = 1.0

  ----------------------------------------------

  Recovery thread nab 1 seq 15 to 74 with 8 zeroblks sets

  2014-11-27 22:49:26.000

  2014-11-27 22:49:26.000433: validate the domain 0

  2014-11-27 22:49:26.001348: valid domain 0, flags = 0x0

  2014-11-27 22:49:28.315

  County ofsmtab$: 0 entries

  2014-11-27 22:49:28.732

  ORA-00942: table or view does not exist

  ORA-00942: table or view does not exist

  2014-11-27 22:49:28.738

  USER (ospid: 20381876): put an end to litigation because of the 942 error

  

  In my case, the problem solved by running the following...

  GRANT SELECT on SYS. The USER$ in XDB.
  GRANT SELECT on SYS. The USER$ in CTXSYS.
  GRANT SELECT on SYS. The USER$ to DVSYS;
  GRANT SELECT on SYS. The USER$ to LBACSYS.
  GRANT SELECT on SYS. The USER$ to APEX_040200;
  GRANT SELECT on SYS. The USER$ to DV_SECANALYST;

  See the screenshot above.

• ORA-01654: impossible to extend the APEX_040200.WWV_FLOW_ROW_TEMPLATE_PK index by 8 in the APEX_APP_USER tablespace

  Hi all!
  need help - creating an application in Application Express 4.2.4.00.08 and got this error when you click Create:

  ORA-01654: impossible to extend the APEX_040200.WWV_FLOW_ROW_TEMPLATE_PK index by 8 in the APEX_APP_USER tablespace

  everything worked perfectly before...

  installed on the local computer on Oracle 11 g...
  

  all solutions?

  Hello

  You can find APEX schema tablespace and data file using for example query

  SELECT f.tablespace_name
    ,f.file_name
  FROM dba_data_files f
  WHERE EXISTS (
    SELECT 1
    FROM dba_users u
    WHERE u.username = 'APEX_040200'
    AND u.default_tablespace = f.tablespace_name
  );
  

  Then increase the size of the data file or add the new data file. In addition, you can activate the automatic extension.

  Modify and maintain storage

  If you use database 11g XE and you have installed APEX SYSAUX tablespace, you may have worn size the system tablespace (s) max.

  Kind regards

  Jari

• dbms_mview. Refresh giving "ORA-00942: table or view does not exist.

  Hi all

  I am trying to update the MV using the dbms_mview package but its gives me the following error.

  "ORA-00942: table or view does not exist.

  I have a MV named TESTMV in my environment. I'm running the following command,

  Start

  dbms_mview. Refresh('TESTMV,'C');

  end;

  ORA-00942: table or view does not exist

  ORA-06512: at "SYS." DBMS_SNAPSHOT", line 2545

  ORA-06512: at "SYS." DBMS_SNAPSHOT", line 2751

  ORA-06512: at "SYS." DBMS_SNAPSHOT", line 2720

  ORA-06512: at line 3 level

  Any suggestions would be much appreciated.

  See you soon,.

  ATOM

  This could be because the underlying source objects are now started to change. Is there any night script that changes or modifies the table of the source? If Yes, this means you will have to recompile the mview before running the update. You can add this line in front of your refresh command.

  You won't see this problem in your new instance if you do not change your source object. It could very well be someone changed your source object only once and you won't have the same problem in the future.

  Please mark this thread as answered if you think that the problem is resolved.

• ORA-00942 Table or view does not exist when you run a procedure

  Hello
  
  I have a procedure called FND_GLOBAL under a scheme called APPS and I have granted execute privilege on this procedure to another schema called CIVICA
  
  However when I run the procedure of the CIVIC scheme I get
  
  ORA-00942 Table or view does not exist
  ORA-06512 at APPS. FND_CORE_LOG, line 25
  ORA-06512 at APPS. FND_GLOBAL, line 104
  ORA-06512 at APPS. FND_GLOBAL, line 1620
  ORA-06512 at APPS. FND_GLOBAL, line 2171
  ORA-06512 at APPS. FND_GLOBAL, line 2313
  
  I'm guessing that some of the sub components must also be given to the CIVICA?
  
  How does work to define rights? Subcomponents should not also be accessible via this procedure being owner / defined by Apps but executed by CIVICA?
  
  Jim

  Hi, Jim,.

  Jim Thompson wrote:
  Sorry Frank - in order to clarify

  I wanted to CIVICA to be able to execute procedures and functions in applications. Package FND_GLOBAL

  However this package has been defined with the rights of the plaintiff - CIVICA must be explicitly object privilege to all objects used by the package (or packages of sub that he calls, that there are some - it is really a case to view the hierarchy of this package and ensure that each object is explicitly given to CIVICA)

  What do you mean by "explicitly granted to CIVICA"? ". Do you mean granted directly to CIVICA, and not a role that CIVICA has?
  Once more, the privileges granted to the roles are good enough for packages AUTHID CURRENT_USER (also known as the "rights of the applicant"). The only time where you have to say "GRANT."... CIVICA"is when granting a role to the CIVICA; all other privileges may be granted to this role, or some other roles that are granted to the role that CIVICA has.
  Mnight want to create a role that has all the necessary privileges to use the package and grant this role to users like CIVICA.

  ... So, it seems as if I have no choice but to get my pen and paper and trace through the nested packages and objects called by FND_GLOBAL and to ensure that they are explicitly granted to CIVICA! I hate days like these!

  CIVIA want to have all the privileges that has APPS? You can query dba_tab_privs (and oither views in the data dictionary) to find (and write statements of "GRANT... ("for) all these privileges.

  You can also create another packet (let's call it FND_GLOBAL_I) in applications with rights of the author. Specification of package would be identical to the specification of FND_GLOBAL package, except that it says FMD_GLOBAL_I instead of FND_GLOBAL. The FND_GLOBAL_I package body are very similar to the spec. The body of each procedure or function would simply be a call to the corresponding functuion in FND_GLOBAL. Since FND_GLOBAL has hundreds of procedures, it will be a lot of work, but perhaps less work than to find exactly what privileges are needed.

• Creating indexes and a default tablespace

  Hi Experts,
  
  Need your help to understand a basic tablespace clause when creating any object.
  I have a table owned by the user and reside on tuberculosis tablspace, table A has two indices i1 and i2, index i1 A user-owned and created by error index i2 belonging to user B.
  index i1 resides on the tb_index tablespace, i2 index created by mistake lies also on same tablespace tb_index.
  I have a question above given the scenario
  
  I2 index that was created by mistake lies in tablespace tb_index, despite mentioning any tablespace clause. How it can be created on the tb_index tablespace when the developer did not mention the tablespace.
  tablespace tb_index is neither database tablspace default is default not storage for user B.
  
  No idea about this help me a lot.
  
  Thank you

  Maybe something like that happening?

  SQL> conn / as sysdba
  Connected.
  SQL> conn test/test
  Connected.
  SQL> select * from user_indexes;
  
  no rows selected
  
  SQL> select table_name, tablespace_name from user_tables;
  
  TABLE_NAME                     TABLESPACE_NAME
  ------------------------------ ------------------------------
  TAB1                           USERS
  
  SQL> conn / as sysdba
  Connected.
  SQL> grant create any index to system;
  
  Grant succeeded.
  
  SQL> conn system/oracle
  ERROR:
  ORA-28002: the password will expire within 7 days
  
  Connected.
  SQL> conn test/test
  Connected.
  
  SQL> revoke index on tab1 from system;
  
  Revoke succeeded.
  
  SQL> conn system/oracle
  ERROR:
  ORA-28002: the password will expire within 7 days
  
  Connected.
  SQL> create index tidx on test.tab1(a);
  
  Index created.
  
  SQL> set pagesize 9999
  SQL> select index_name, table_name, tablespace_name, owner from all_indexes where table_name='TAB1'
    2  ;
  
  INDEX_NAME                     TABLE_NAME
  ------------------------------ ------------------------------
  TABLESPACE_NAME                OWNER
  ------------------------------ ------------------------------
  TIDX                           TAB1
  SYSTEM                         SYSTEM
  

  HTH
  Aman...

• Try first with I BDB - indexes and legacy trouble... (FIXED)

  Hi Mark,
  
  Mark wrote:
  
  Hi, I'm a newbie here to try a few things on I BDB. And now I'm having
  I am happy to help you with this, but I have to ask you to re - ask this question on the forum I BDB, which is...
  
  Sorry for the mistake. Now, I know this is the place to post my doubts.
  
  I am really interested in product I BDB. I think it's fantastic!
  
  About my first post on "Index and legacy" I BDB, I discovered that the fix for this and in fact, he was not on the 'Index and legacy' but ' * legacy and sequence * ' because I my ' @Persistent public abstract class AbstractEntity ' with a '@PrimaryKey (sequence = "ID_SEQ") private Long id' property.
  
  This class is completed by all my business class (employee @Entity and @Entity Department) in order to have my business classes their autoincremented PrimaryKey in the sequence.
  
  But all of my business classes have the same name of the sequence: 'ID_SEQ' then when I start my BDB I running for the first time, I start saving 3 new items Department and the sequence of these objects star Department with "#1"and ends with #3.»
  
  Then I continue the registration of Employee objects (here was the problem) I thought that my next sequence number might be #4, but in fact it was #101 then when I tried to save my first employee, I put the property 'managerId = null' as this employee is the Manager, then, when I tried to save my second employee who works under one (Officer) I got the following exception message:
  
  TryingJEBDBApp DatabaseExcaption: com.sleepycat.je.ForeignConstraintException: (I 4.0.71) secondary persist #EntityStoreName #com.dmp.gamblit.persistence.BDB.store.eployee.Employee #* managerId *.
  foreign key not allowed: it is not present in the foreign database
  #EntityStoreName #com.dmp.gamblit.persistence.BDB.store.eployee.Employee persist
  
  The solution:
  I fixed, it will change the value managerId from "4" to "101" and it works now!
  
  Right now, I'm trying to understand the mechanism of the sequence and the refining of the concerns about the handling of cursors...
  You have any good material on these subjects, maybe a link where I can find more detailed information on these?
  
  Thanks in advance the Mark, thank you for your attention and I'll post more doubts in the future for sure. 0)
  
  Kind regards
  
  Diego
  

• re-installation of iTune error, get"objects"already exists.

  To remove iTunes and reinstall the same, I was informed by System 7 Upgrade Advisor.  I uninstalled iTunes, but decided to not upgrade the system, due to some hardware problems.  When I try to re - install iTunes I get an error "object already Exists."  I had a similar problem a few months ago with the installation of any kind of software on the same machine.  Someone in the community suggested that the installer has been damaged by a update file.  The solution was to remove this file from update.  Unfortunately, I has not documented this event with care.  I do not think the current issue are the same anyway, because I downloaded other software with similar incidents.  When you try to win the support of Apple on the issue, they advise their archives are not familiar with this issue, that I'll probably get the installation of other software, and I have to contact Microsoft Support.  MS has no obvious trace of that particular difficulty.  Anyone out there have any suggestions?  Thank you for your kind attention.

  Hello

  Uninstall everything according to the instructions from Apple:

  «Remove and reinstall iTunes, QuickTime, and other software components for Windows Vista or Windows 7»

  http://support.Apple.com/kb/HT1923

  It is also the same list of what to remove what is in the link above from Apple:

  http://pcsupport.about.com/od/findbyerrormessage/a/MSVCR80-DLL-not-found-missing-error.htm

  Or try this program to remove it:

  http://www.revouninstaller.com/revo_uninstaller_free_download.html

  Then, download and save the iTunes on the desktop > then right click > select run as administrator to install.

  If the advice already given does not, please contact Apple for assistance.

  "Not to install iTunes or QuickTime for Windows"

  http://support.Apple.com/kb/HT1926

  "iTunes support-how to use iTunes.

  http://www.Apple.com/support/iTunes/

  "Contact iTunes Support.

  http://www.Apple.com/support/iTunes/contact/

  Or ask in the community Apple iTunes:

  https://discussions.Apple.com/community/iTunes

  See you soon.

• Question indexing and backup...

  Couple questions.

  1 indexing - I created a directory "backup" off the rooy on my device via the file browser. Even with the pictures etc..., it's the area that I intend to backup just things, documents, programs, etc... To my surprise, images in this directory is indexed and illustrated with photos. Is this by design? In any case stop as long as these are usually the images that go with the product installs.

  2. I noticed in the backup agent it refers to \\myhubname\backup but that folder does not exist (this is why I created it). "However, on this backup operation (the one that installs by default), it stores data to \\myhubname\import\"directory file names "... strange.

  Any thoughts would be appreciated.

  Thank you.

  udflyer

  1. Yes, it's by design. Nothing in the files of importation or the media is indexed. I suggest using the backup folder.

  2. strange that the backup folder was not there. It is a default action.

• Cipher.exe object already exists error

  Hello, I had a customer bring a laptop Windows 7 Professional to the other day saying she has difficulty to create a folder that is encrypted for the work. Long story short is that it must have a file encrypted on the machine for this application to work and it must be able to use it for his job. She is the only user in its place with this question and their residents IT guy is as puzzled as I am.

  When I run "cipher /e s:test" or "cipher /e s:C:\users\naomi\test" cipher returns the error "the object already exists.

  It does no file encrypted on the computer, and to my knowledge, she has never tried to use encryption so far. I ran the System File Checker to see if she could be a problem with some files on the system, but no joy there.

  On the off chance that maybe their was something wrong with its key set so I tried to launch the /k option for him generate a new key and received the same error again.

  Thinking that maybe there was a problem in their user profile, I created a test called Administrator account and tried to use encryption for the new account and continue to receive the same object already exists error.

  Personally I have never seen this problem before and what research I did did not find me any useful results. Has anyone seen here this error before and know the cause or have any suggestions on what I might try next?

  Thank you

  Chris

  Chris

  You stand a better chance of getting an answer if repost you this on Technet

  This issue is beyond the scope of this site and must be placed on Technet or MSDN
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home

  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home