OrSplit-Join and conditional transition

Similar Questions

• Difference-conditions (join and a Where Clause)

  Hi people,

  I need to clearly agree on what a difference exactly when we put any condition in INNER JOIN and the WHERE Clause.

  I have tried both way and found the same results. Even in the statistics Plan not much differences.  Any help would be appreciated.

  As:

  1 here, I use filter store in the join condition - Inner

  "SELECT i., Gl * Sc1.Item I.

  Inner Join Sc1.Part P

  On P.Part_Id = I.Part_Id

  Inner Join Sc1.Location Gl

  On Gl.Location_Id = I.Location_Id

  And Gl.Location_Id in (1767, 1747,202,1625)

  Inner Join Sc1.Condition C

  On C.Condtion_Id = Gl.Condition_Id

  Where I.Inactive_Ind = 0

  And I.Condition_Id! = 325

  2. here I use filter store in Where clause-

  SELECT i., Gl * Sc1.Item I

  Inner Join Sc1.Part P

  On P.Part_Id = I.Part_Id

  Inner Join Sc1.Location Gl

  On Gl.Location_Id = I.Location_Id

  Inner Join Sc1.Condition C

  On C.Condtion_Id = Gl.Condition_Id

  Where I.Inactive_Ind = 0

  and I.LOCATION_ID in (1767, 1747,202,1625)

  And I.Condition_Id! = 325

  Thank you

  Mark
  

  
  

  
  

  Hello

  MarkCooper wrote:

  Hi guys,.

  To reply to all - I understand.

  1. its good practice to use conditions / filter (except CLAUSE) in the WHERE Clause rather Inner join? bon ?

  2. now, in my previous example. We could use the location code in where clause as it was in the two tables.

  What is the best practice to use the code to location here ( 1 /2) ?

  1. here I use filter store in the Inner join condition ( guess the location code is not in the article table)).

  "SELECT i., Gl * Sc1.Item I.

  Inner Join Sc1.Part P

  On P.Part_Id = I.Part_Id

  Inner Join Sc1.Location Gl

  On Gl.Location_Id = I.Location_Id

    And Gl.Location_Id in (1767, 1747,202,1625)

  Inner Join Sc1.Condition C

  On C.Condtion_Id = Gl.Condition_Id

  Where I.Inactive_Ind = 0

  And I.Condition_Id! = 325

  2. here I use filter store in Where clause (assume that the location code is not in the article table)-

  SELECT i., Gl * Sc1.Item I

  Inner Join Sc1.Part P

  On P.Part_Id = I.Part_Id

  Inner Join Sc1.Location Gl

  On Gl.Location_Id = I.Location_Id

  Inner Join Sc1.Condition C

  On C.Condtion_Id = Gl.Condition_Id

  Where I.Inactive_Ind = 0

    And Gl.Location_Id in (1767, 1747,202,1625)

  And I.Condition_Id! = 325

  Thank you

  If location_id isn't in the item table, then the join condition

  On Gl.Location_Id = I.Location_Id

  will cause an error.

  Once more, it should not affect results or performance if a condition like

  Gl.Location_Id in (1767, 1747,202,1625)

  is in the clause or the WHERE clause.  No matter if it is be a column called location_id in any other table, or if the same column Gl.Location_Id is used in other conditions.

  As this condition only refers to a table (GI), I recommend you put it in a WHERE clause, just to make the code clearer.

  Yet once, this applies only to the inner joins, not for outer joins and not to CONNECT BY queries.

• How to write a query to join and right join

  Hello

  With the help of 10 gr 2:

  I have a scenario where generate us a report by joining a few tables.

  same goes for ex:

  Select col1, col2, col5, col10 col22...

  from tableA, tableB.

  where tableA.col1 = tableB.col1 etc.

  I have a requirement where choose a flag in the front-end server must be a right join.  so, if the flag is N, I need to return the data returned by the join; but, if the flag is there I need to make a right join and returns all the data corresponding to table A and table B, as well as the data in table B.

  (I did mention only two tables, as they are, they main engines, there are very many other tables joined in this request)

  It is possible to write a query, so that the two scenarios can be addressed based on the flag?

  Thanks in advance

  Hello

  user565033 wrote:

  ... When Oracle treats of the WHERE clause that starts from the bottom or the top?  So it's best to put filters that reject the unnecessary lines at the beginning of the place where clause or end?  Is how important it? ...

  No, it does not matter.

  The optimizer evaluates what condition will be faster and/or more selective (that is, will eliminate the most lines) and make the first condition.

  If the optimzer cannot decide on what terms will be faster or more selective, it can arbitrarily don't close at the end of the WHERE clause first, but, even if you already knew for sure, this is exactly the kind of thing that is likely to change from one version to the other, or platform to another.

  The optimizer (in recent versions, at least) is very good.  If the optimizer can not say what conditions should apply first, then, chances are, there is really no significant difference, so it would be not serious of which one was made first.

  If you read something that indicates the order is important, it is very outdated.  Long ago (version 6), there was no cost-based optimizer and the order of the conditions in the WHERE clause was important.  The cost-based optimizer was introduced in Oracle 7 (1992) and has been greatly improved by Oracle 8.1 (1998).  Also later Oracle 10, the older optimizer ("regulated") was available for those who really want to continue to use it.

• BAD RESULTS WITH OUTER JOINS AND TABLES WITH A CHECK CONSTRAINT

  HII All,
  Could any such a me when we encounter this bug? Please help me with a simple example so that I can search for them in my PB.
  
  
  Bug:-8447623
  
  Bug / / Desc: BAD RESULTS WITH OUTER JOINS AND TABLES WITH a CHECK CONSTRAINT
  
  
  I ran the outer joins with check queries constraint 11G 11.1.0.7.0 and 10 g 2, but the result is the same. Need to know the scenario where I will face this bug of your experts and people who have already experienced this bug.
  
  
  Version: -.
  

  SQL> select * from v$version;
  
  BANNER
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
  PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
  CORE    11.1.0.7.0      Production
  TNS for Solaris: Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
  NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production

  Why do you not use the description of the bug test case in Metalink (we obviously can't post it here because it would violate the copyright of Metalink)? Your test case is not a candidate for the elimination of the join, so he did not have the bug.

  Have you really read the description of the bug in Metalink rather than just looking at the title of the bug? The bug itself is quite clear that a query plan that involves the elimination of the join is a necessary condition. The title of bug nothing will never tell the whole story.

  If you try to work through a few tens of thousands of bugs in 11.1.0.7, of which many are not published, trying to determine whether your application would be affected by the bug? Wouldn't be order of magnitude easier to upgrade the application to 11.1.0.7 in a test environment and test the application to see what, if anything, breaks? Understand that the vast majority of the problems that people experience during an upgrade are not the result of bugs - they are the result of changes in behaviour documented as changes in query plans. And among those who encounter bugs, a relatively large fraction of the new variety. Even if you have completed the Herculean task of verifying each bug on your code base, which would not significantly easier upgrade. In addition, at the time wherever you actually performed this analysis, Oracle reportedly released 3 or 4 new versions.

  And at this stage would be unwise to consider an upgrade to 11.2?

  Justin

• Is it possible to modify an existing join, and more?

  In Discoverer Plus, is it possible to modify a join in a relationship? Currently I have only access to the office (10.1.2.2), but if it can be done more it is perhaps something worth pursuing.
  
  My situation is, I have a pretty complex spreadsheet where I need to change an existing join to an outer join. I can't change the join itself, in Admin - which would affect the other reports that use it. I know that in the office, if I remove all the elements of the joined table (including the Calc and conditions that reference), and then add them back, it will prompt me for how to use join. However, in this case, at the time when I remove and re-add all of these, I basically had to rewrite the report.
  
  I'm sure that's what I have to do, but I hope that someone will be aware of a workaround that I'm missing. If access to the more will make things easier, it would be worth.
  
  Thank you!

  Hello
  I'm afraid you would fare no better and more is like the same thing will happen here. You need to remove all the elements that use the existing join as soon as you start adding back in you will be asked to choose a join.

  There are many good reasons to use, this is not one of them as the feature, or lack of function from your point of view, is the same.

  Best wishes
  Michael

• Problem with Outer join and filter

  Hello
  
  I join two tables in the source using a left outer join. Outside of the join, I have a filter specified with condition TabA.C1 > TabB.C2.
  
  Now, when ODI generates the query it puts the left outer join on the filter condition as well. So he puts filter as
  
  where
  (1 = 1)
  And ((TabA.C1 = TabB.C1 (+)) AND)
  (TabA.C2 = TabB.C2 (+))
  And TabA.C10 > TabB.C14 (+)
  
  How to avoid this problem. I tried this performance on stage as well, always generated query remains the same.
  
  I use the incremental update of the IKM Oracle. My source and target are both on the same PB.
  
  
  ~ Chikk

  Hi Chikk,

  If you analyze the data, you'll see it's OK to have the "(+)" to the filter...

  Anyway, if you want to drop it, leave it as inner join and put the "(+)" manually to the join object.

  This help you?

• Unable to accept the terms and conditions of the icloud

  My iPhone IS / 10.0.2 IOS does not allow me to accept to iCloud and conditions: therefore, not able to connect to the Apple ID server and cannot connect to Wi - Fi. I have already change network settings - did not help. Erase all content and settings & restored - did not help. Do not connect to a Wi - Fi network didn't happen until I applied IOS 10.02. iCloud question began the week last while on IOS 9.35 - thinking update IOS would be the solution - NOT.

  Try a reset.

  Reset device

  Try a reset.

  Reset - iPhone 7

• May not accept the terms and conditions, try to

  Hello

  IM trying to update my subscription to an application and I get an error that indicates that I must accept the new terms of Apple and Conditions but brings me to the possibility of accepting these terms and conditions as I normally get.

  I restarted twice now and I'm still not able to do.

  Thanks for the help.

  Have you tried to sing and then again in the app store?

  1. Open app store
  2. Scroll to the bottom of the page
  3. Click sign out
  4. Click on connect

• screen locked on the terms and conditions. Help!

  screen went to the terns and conditions. Now, it won't move off the screen. Do not what anyone, cannot turn off because it blocks the screen access to anything whatsoever

  Have you tried to do a hard reset? (Hold down the sleep/wake button and the "home" button).

• Unable to accept the terms and Conditions

  Summary of the issue
  Other issues of Windows Live family safety

  What version of Windows Live Family Safety do you use?
  Version 2011 (15.4.3538.513)
  Choose your operating system version:
  Windows 7

  Additional details
  I am trying to accept the terms of the Windows Live, but when I press the button "I accept" the "review and accept the agreements I get an error indicating that:

  There is a temporary problem

  There is a temporary problem with the service. Please try again. If you continue to receive this message, try again later.

  I tried different user accounts on the PC and different browsers but get the same error. I can find other people have had a similar problem, but don't see anywhere that he was properly treated. This prevents currently put me parental controls on user accounts for my children.

  Hi Stu has,

  The error message 'it is a temporary problem with the service. Please try again. "If you continue to receive this message, try again later." When accepting the terms and Conditions will occur if the profile that is associated with your account is incomplete. We suggest that you first connect to http://account.live.com and update your profile information. After updating your profile information, sign in to your account and accept the terms and Conditions again. If this problem persists always, reply to this message with the address affected so that we can help you further.

  Thank you

  Gerard G.

• EBS: Model contract terms "how to set withdrawal terms and Conditions?

  EBS: XSL - FO-> general terms and conditions contract template

  Hello Oracle:

  I work with EBS - contracts in. objective: removal of the terms and Conditions contained according to the hierarchical level.  Contract terms of content is controlled by the model XSLFO planted, called "OKCTERMS_en.xsl".   How would you recommend I change indentation for the terms and Conditions?

  Please send links to reliable articles on even.

  Thank you

  TreeStrepk

  This is solve it.  * Use the StructureLevel attribute that is passed via XML to calculate the withdrawal start outline and text clause.  Here is the code snippet.

  

  

  

  

• Dynamic action - when the 'event' and 'condition' seems to have no sense

  Step by step, I am trying to get free Javascript coding so I can rely on what natively offers the Apex. It was an interesting experience, however I have noticed certain situations sicesdonneessontdisponibles options seems to have no sense, at least to date, and you will certainly help me which can be cleared up. I tried to put one of them into words. I just created a new dynamic action that will just set the focus to an element whenever my page is loaded.

  Why my new dynamic action allows me to choose the "Page loading" event and condition "sucks"? I don't understand why this combination is available. There is probably no effect anyway, but I decided to leave the condition "without condition."

  Thanks in advance.

  Franklin.Jr wrote:

  Step by step, I am trying to get free Javascript coding so I can rely on what natively offers the Apex. It was an interesting experience, however I have noticed certain situations sicesdonneessontdisponibles options seems to have no sense, at least to date, and you will certainly help me which can be cleared up. I tried to put one of them into words. I just created a new dynamic action that will just set the focus to an element whenever my page is loaded.

  Why my new dynamic action allows me to choose the "Page loading" event and condition "sucks"? I don't understand why this combination is available. There is probably no effect anyway, but I decided to leave the condition "without condition."

  It's just that there is a basic LOV status of one size for all types of events. Most of the conditions it contains is relevant to events associated with the elements. "Page Load" + "sucks" doesn't in fact make sense, but 'P4_END_DATE' + 'is null' fact. The Condition property remains visible and active so that the option "JavaScript expression" are available, as this can be used to make any event conditional.

• Questions about the terms and conditions

  Dear team of Adobe Stock,

  I am considering a subscription for an e-commerce site that I am developing. I have a few questions about the terms and conditions:

  3.5 social media use. You can view or download an unmodified version of the book on the Social media Site if (A) you include a notice of copyright in the work itself (© author name - stock.adobe.com) and (B) the terms of use governing the Social media Site do not include any provision that would grant exclusive rights or the ownership of those works or alterations to anyone. "Social Media Site" means a website or application that puts the main emphasis on facilitating social interaction between its users and allowing users to share content in such social interaction

  What I have to insert in each post on social media on behalf of the author? Generally, this information is displayed only for free images. What I have to insert this information even if I signed up for a plan?

  Thank you

  Hello

  Please see the link below for help:

  http://wwwimages.Adobe.com/content/dam/ACOM/en/legal/servicetou/Adobe-stock-additional-ter ms_20160119.pdf

• I just joined and have acrobat/cloud but can't figure how to change text on my document?  Can someone help me?

  I just joined and have acrobat/cloud but can't figure how to change text on my document?   Can someone help me?

  Hi annc36037142 ,

  I would like to point out that after installation of Acrobat Pro DC, open the document & tools 'Edit PDF' option, you can edit PDF files.

  Please refer to this article:- https://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/using/edit-text-pdfs.html

  I would like to know if it works.

  Kind regards

  Christian

• join with condition

  Hi all

  Is there a possible way to cross the join with condition?

  I want something like this:

  Table A: custid, accu_id, sum

  CustID, accu_id unique =

  CustomerID amount accu_id

  10 25 400

  10 35 447

  10 29 420

  20 30 510

  30 35 472

  .

  .

  .

  Table b: accu_id, description

  accu_id description

  shoes 25

  Book 29

  30 computer

  pen 35

  Note: in table A, it is a mismatch of the accu_id values that do not use. Please, take into account this.

  I want to see all the columns in the TABLE B for each custid in A. TABLE (something like cross join but with ONE article.) The following query does not work.

  Select * from a right join B on A.accu_id = B.accu_id;

  10-25

  10-29

  10-30

  10-35

  20-25

  20-29

  20-30

  20-35

  30 25

  30 29

  30 30

  30-35

  What should I do for this?

  Thanks in advance

  Use partition outer join:

  with a (too)

  Select double union all 10 custid, accu_id 25, amount 400

  Select 10,35,447 from all the double union

  Select 10,29,420 from all the double union

  Select 20,30,510 from all the double union

  Select double 30,35,472

  ),

  b like)

  Select accu_id 25, "shoe" description of all the double union

  Select 29, 'book' from dual union all

  Select 30, 'computer' from dual union all

  Select 35, 'pen' from dual

  )

  Select a.custid,

  a.accu_id,

  a.amount,

  b.

  a

  by (a.custid) partition

  right join

  b

  On a.accu_id = b.accu_id

  order of a.custid,

  a.accu_id

  /

  AMOUNT ACCU_ID CUSTID DESCRIPT
  ---------- ---------- ---------- --------
  10 25 400 shoe
  10 29 420 book
  10 35 447 pen
  10 computer
  20 30 510 computer
  shoe 20
  book 20
  20                       pen
  30 35 472 pen
  30 shoe
  30 book

  AMOUNT ACCU_ID CUSTID DESCRIPT
  ---------- ---------- ---------- --------
  30 computer

  12 selected lines.

  SQL >

  SY.