Performance problem - generating the SQL query

Hi experts,

We are facing a problem of performance on our dashboards. Used for testing dashboard page contains a prompt with two parameters (month & location) and 3 reports (1 table & 2 graphics). We put in the effort to optimize the speed of the query and the database returns the results after 1 sec. However, after changing values prompt, it takes up to 15 years before the request is sent to the database (based on the log).

We have done the following tests for an overview. Have tests in a test environment with clustered servers to exclude the possible implications of users numbers.

(1) raise the reports with the same prompt values
-> Page is returned immediately and the log shows that the results are retrieved from the cache

(2) run the page even with fewer reports
-> Removing a report from the page reduces the time to send the request to the database to 8 s

(3) check the traffic of a browser with sniffer
-> No. requests were sent 15-year timespan. Once the request is sent results instantly appear and the page is built in no time.

Can anyone provide an idea as to what happens between the time the user's request is triggered via the guest of dashboard and the request is sent to the database?

Hi Karl,
I'm so glad you have at the bottom of it. You might find that oracle can help you with more information about the ODBC via a SR statement.

Tags: Business Intelligence

Similar Questions

Performance problem on the SQL query that does not use the primary key index
Hello!

I have some performance issues on a single SQL query (Oracle 10 g).
I could solve the problem by using the INDEX indicator, but I would like to know WHY this is happening.

* Tables *.
create table jobs)
ID number (5) not null,
name varchar2 (100),
primary key constraint Job_PK (id)
)
/
-Record count: 298

create table Comp)
integer ID not null,
name varchar2 (100),
primary key constraint Comp_PK (id)
)
/
-Record count: 193

-Relation m: n
create table JobComp)
integer ID not null,
id_job integer not null,
id_comp integer not null,
primary key constraint JobComp_PK (id),
unique key constraint JobComp_UK (id_job, id_comp),
Constraint JobComp_FK_Job foreign key (id_job) refers to Job (id),
Constraint JobComp_FK_Comp foreign key (id_comp) makes reference Comp (id)
)
/
create index JobComp_IX_Comp on JobComp (Cod_Comp)
/
create index JobComp_IX_Job on JobComp (Cod_Job)
/
-Record count: 6431

* Ask *.

When I run this query, the execution plan shows the index using (JobComp_PK and JobComp_IX_Comp).
No problem.

Select JobComp.*
of JobComp
Join jobs
on Job.id = JobComp.id_job
where JobComp.id_comp = 134
/
-runs in 0.20 sec

But when I add the field 'name' of the work table the plan uses full access table to the table of work

Select JobComp.*, Job.name
of JobComp
Join jobs
on Job.id = JobComp.id_job
where JobComp.id_comp = 134
/
-runs in the 2.70 dry

With the help of the index

Select / * + INDEX (Job Job_PK) * /.
JobComp.*, Job.name
of JobComp
Join jobs
on Job.id = JobComp.id_job
where JobComp.id_comp = 134
/
-runs in 0.20 sec

* Doubt *.

This behavior is correct?

PS. : I tried to recalculate the statistics, but nothing changes:

analyze the job calculation table statistics.
/
change the statistical calculation of index Job_PK reconstruction;
/
Start
dbms_utility.analyze_schema (sys_context ('userenv', 'current_schema'), 'CALCULATE');
end;
/

[of]
Gustavo Ehrhardt
Gus.EHR wrote:
Hello.
I'm sorry for the plan unformatted.
The execution time of the querys "without field name' and 'with the field name with suspicion" are equal.
He has no problem caching, because I get the plans of the sequence different from the querys and repeated the performance. The result is always the same.

I don't think that there is no problem with oracle crossing LOOP IMBRIQUEE to the HASH JOIN when you include the field name and this should be the expected behavior. But it seems that your WORKING table has a degree of parallelism set against what is causing the query to run in parallel (as JOB table is now available with full table scan, instead of indexed access earlier). It could be that the parallel execution is contributor to extra Runtime.
(a) do you know why the degree of parallelism on the WORK table has been defined? Do you need it?

You can see if the following query provides a better response time?
```
select /*+ NOPARALLEL(JOB) */ JobComp.*, Job.Name
  from JobComp
  join Job
    on Job.id = JobComp.id_job
 where JobComp.id_comp = 134
```

problem with bind variables in the SQL query view object

Hi all
I use JDev 11.1.2.4.0.
I have a problem with bind variables in the SQL query view object.
This is my original SQL
```
SELECT sum(t.TIME) , t.legertype_id
FROM LEDGER t
WHERE t.nctuser_id = '20022' 
      AND to_char(t.insertdate,'YYYYMMDD') in ('20130930','20130929')
group by t.legertype_id
```
In my view .xml object query tab, I am writing this
```
SELECT sum(t.TIME) , t.legertype_id
FROM LEDGER t
WHERE   t.nctuser_id = '20022'
    AND to_char(t.insertdate,'YYYYMMDD') in :dddd
group by t.legertype_id
```
Davis here is a variable of Type liaison: String, updatable and necessary.
I try to deal with Davis as ('20130930 ', ' 20130929') hoping the view object, run as my original SQL.
But failed. The view object retrieves 0 line after that I run.
Why?
Thank you! ('2original SQL0130930', '20130929') ('20130930 ', ' 20130929')

A variable binding cannot be used as this is why you must use years table. Check decompilation binary ADF: using oracle.jbo.domain.Array with ViewCriteria to see a solution.

Timo

Table error ' can not analyze the SQL query!

Hi all
I created a view on my database called VIEW_MEMBER_PARTIC_PROJECTS
If I run a query showing the results of the view:
SELECT * FROM VIEW_MEMBER_PARTIC_PROJECTS
I get the following data
Projects Participants
1 31 S
2 41
3 19
4 3
5 3
6 1
7 2
Now, I wanted to represent this diagram in the APEX so I created a graphic region and entered the Source query generator and the manufacturer produces the following code
Select null, label projects, value1 Participant link
of "SCHEMANAME." "" VIEW_MEMBER_PARTIC_PROJECTS ".
With this code, I get an error:
Cannot parse the SQL query!
Select the link null, label projects, value1 "SCHEMANAME Participant." "" VIEW_MEMBER_PARTIC_PROJECTS ".
Some queries can be run when you run your application, if your query is syntactically correct, you can save your query without validation (see options below the source of the query).
The code looks OK, but I do not see to save options as the error code is mentioned.
No one knows how to fix this?
Thank you

JaReg wrote:

I finally found the problem.

I looked at the code for the view and changed the start of:

CREATE OR REPLACE FORCE EDITIONABLE VIEW "SCHEMANAME." "" VIEW_MEMBER_PARTIC_PROJECTS "("Participant","Projects")

AS

TO

CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW "SCHEMANAME." "" VIEW_REPEAT_PARATIC ".

AS

And that seemed to fix it. I'm not entirely sure why though.

The view was created using the quoted identifiers for column names. This makes them sensitive and means that they must always be referenced using double quotes. In the absence of quotation marks, Oracle is not case insensitive and automatically converts all uppercase identifiers. The application of graph:

Select the link null, label projects, value1 "SCHEMANAME Participant." "" VIEW_MEMBER_PARTIC_PROJECTS ".

has therefore been interpreted by Oracle:

SELECT THE LINK NULL, LABEL, VALUE1 "SCHEMANAME PARTICIPANT PROJECTS." "" VIEW_MEMBER_PARTIC_PROJECTS ".

and PROJECTS and PARTICIPANT columns were not recognized because the columns defined for the view have been 'Participant' and 'projects '. The graphic request should have been:

Select the link null, the label of "Projects", "Participant" value1 "SCHEMANAME." "" VIEW_MEMBER_PARTIC_PROJECTS ".

As you have now discovered, quoted identifiers are a source of nothing but obscure bugs and should never be used for database objects. He also pointed out the reason why you should always use a standardized, form tiny, coding style as it is faster to type, easy to read and less prone to errors.

Pool pane there problem with long sql query?

Hello
I use Jdeveloper 11.1.2.2.0
In the application I'm developing, there is a long sql query to call (it's a function from a package, which may take a few minutes to run) and I want to display a progress bar for the user.
The progress bar component is a "progress indicator" and the percentage of achivement is refreshed by a component 'pool' with 1-second interval.
The two components are connected in a javabean.
The function with the sql query is the javabean too.
To run the sql query that is long on background I am calling from a thread, and the pool component get the advancement of the percentage of a pipe filled with the sql function.
If the function to run is just a long loop of java operations the progress bar works fine, but if I put my long sql query instead, stop listener pool should be performed to stop long, s sql queryo progress are updated only at the end of the long sql query.
You have any ideas?
Thank you

Thanks for your replies. Unfortunately, it was not the solution to my case, sql procedures to block the entire application while ADF awaits them at the end...

To solve my problem, I finally used a PL SQL Job to call my sql procedure (dbms_job.submit).

The application is released right after the call and the component of the pool is not more secure!

Kind regards

Yann

Problem in the SQL because of the order by clause

Hi all
I am facing a problem in a sql query. I use Oracle 10 g 2.
Query is given below:

SELECT t1.ename
        FROM T1, T2
       WHERE T1.EMPNO = 1234
         AND T1.ACCOUNTNO = T2.ACCOUNTNO
         AND T1.SEQ = T2.SEQ
       ORDER BY T2.SEQ

The query Plan is:

.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                     | Name                 | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT              |                      |     2 |   218 | 11716   (1)| 00:00:41 |
|*  1 |  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID  | T1                   |     1 |    89 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   2 |   NESTED LOOPS                |                      |     2 |   218 | 11716   (1)| 00:00:41 |
|*  3 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T2                   |     2 |    40 | 11715   (1)| 00:00:41 |
|   4 |     INDEX FULL SCAN           | PK_T2_SEQ            | 58752 |       |   122   (5)| 00:00:01 |
|*  5 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN           | FK_ACCOUNTNO         |     3 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now, I want to reduce the time of this request.

If I remove order by clause query that the query performance is quite perfect, but with order by clause its take time.

I already set SORT_AREA_SIZE, but still nothing improves.

Welcome and thank you for your suggestions.

Thank you

Published by: BluShadow on June 23, 2011 07:55
addition of {noformat}

{noformat} tags and formatted explain plan to make it readable.  Please see {message:id=9360002} for details on how to post code and data

Hey, a quick test, try:

select ename from (
SELECT t1.ename, T2.SEQ
FROM T1, T2
WHERE T1.EMPNO = 1234
AND T1.ACCOUNTNO = T2.ACCOUNTNO
AND T1.SEQ = T2.SEQ
and rownum > 0)
ORDER BY SEQ

Amiel Davis

SQL (body of function from PL/SQL returning the SQL) query when you use to_char
We are trying to build a page of Type SQL Query report (body of function from PL/SQL returning SQL query).
our request is simple, to extract the month of the column recording_date.

declare
l_query varchar2 (1000);
Start
l_query: = 'select to_char (recording_date, 'MM') of re_productive;
Return l_query;
end;

but we would like the following for this query problem

Function returning SQL query: query cannot be parsed in the generator. If you believe that your query is syntactically correct, check the box of generic columns below the source of the region without analysis.
(ORA-06550: line 4, column 42: PLS-00103: encountered the symbol "MY" what awaits one of the following values:.) (* @ % & = - +; <>/ at is mod remains not rem <>or! = or ~ = > = < = <>and or as between | multiset Member SUBMULTISET_ the symbol ".") was inserted before 'MY' to continue.)

Notes:
1 - the request is correct and it has been tested under sqlplus and toad.
2. we tried option use generic name (analysis of query runtime only) column, but we get the same problem.

any quick help please.
Hello

You have not escaped your quote in the string. Try this...
```
DECLARE
l_query VARCHAR2(32767);

BEGIN

l_query:= 'select to_char(recording_date,''MM'') from re_productive';

RETURN l_query;

END;
```
See you soon

Ben

Classic report shows wrong "could not parse the SQL query: ORA-00942" error after migrating app to the new environment

After migrating my APEX 4.1 application to a new environment, one classic report displays a "cannot parse the SQL query: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist" error when the page is displayed. Change the region to report SQL source to somehow (e.g., remove spaces, changing the order of the variables in the WHERE clause) immediately solves the problem, but by returning to the source of the region causes the report error again (the source region valid code without error, however).
Throw the error message:
Select v.id,
v.Col1
of view_vw v
where (: P1_FILTER is null or)
v.col2 = :P1_FILTER)
Do not throw error:
Select v.id,
v.Col1
of view_vw v
where (:P1_FILTER is null or)
v.col2 = :P1_FILTER)
Changing the order of column in the report has the same effect; i.e. He arranges, but return back to the original column order causes the error to display.
It's as if a cached result for the correct select statement used by the report is displayed. However, the application does not use the caching of page/region. Any ideas of what could be the cause?

He solved. Ultimately, all that was necessary was to clear the DB cache using:

alter system flush shared_pool;

Clarification of the SQL query in 2 day + Guide APEX

I worked through the Oracle Database Express Edition 2 day + Application Express Developer's Guide, and try to decipher the SQL query in Chapter 4 (building your app).
The code is:
SELECT d.DEPARTMENT_ID,
d.DEPARTMENT_NAME,
(select count (*) from oehr_employees where department_id = d.department_id)
"Number of employees", he said.
substr (e.first_name, 1, 1) |'. ' || Select 'Name Manager',
c.COUNTRY_NAME 'place '.
OEHR_DEPARTMENTS d,
E OEHR_EMPLOYEES
OEHR_LOCATIONS l,
C OEHR_COUNTRIES
WHERE d.LOCATION_ID = l.LOCATION_ID
AND l.COUNTRY_ID = c.COUNTRY_ID
AND e.department_id = d.DEPARTMENT_ID
AND d.manager_id = e.employee_id
AND instr (superior (d.department_name), superior (nvl (:P2_REPORT_SEARCH,d.department_name))) > 0)
I don't know exactly what is happening in the last line. I think I understand what the different functions but I'm not clear on the use of the: P2_REPORT_SEARCH string.
What does this string? This code simply checking that d.department_name isn't NA?
I have SQL experience but am not very familiar with the Oracle PL/SQL implementation. Can someone please give me a brief breakdown that check is doing in the context of the overall query? The application seems to work even if the conditional statement is not included.
Thank you.

2899145 wrote:

Thanks for the reply. I apologize if the information I added was incomplete. The code came from the day 2 + Application Express (version 4.2) Developer Guide.

In the section 'your own Application of 4 Buuilding' https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E37097_01/doc.42/e35122/build_app.htm#TDPAX04000 , they describe the creation of a report

page that includes the "manager_id" and 'location_id '. The SQL query, I pasted above extracted from the data in other tables to substitute the real 'name of the Manager' and 'rent '.

for the corresponding ID values. It makes sense, and the part of the SQL query that explicitly doing this makes sense.

However, given that the document is a guide for the development of the APEX, I guess the command:

AND instr (upper (d.department_name), upper (nvl (:P2_REPORT_SEARCH,d.department_name))) > 0

done something valuable, and I do not recognize what is exactly the value.

From a practical point of view why would I need to include this conditional statement? Which only added to the application?

Looking at the guide in question, it is clear that the
```
AND instr(upper(d.department_name),upper(nvl(:P2_REPORT_SEARCH,d.department_name)))>0
```
the line is completely unnecessary in the context of this tutorial, and it can be removed. The search in the tutorial app page is implemented by using a report filter interactive rather than a P2_REPORT_SEARCH element, which does not seem to exist at all. (It's a quirk of the APEX that bind variable references to non-existent items are replaced with NULL silently rather than exceptions). I thought that perhaps it would be legacy code a version of the tutorial prior to the introduction of interactive reports at the APEX 3.1, but I can't find explicit instructions to create such an element of filter in the 3.0 tutorial. I guess it must have been automatically generated by the application wizard when you create a standard report page.

If you do not want to see the effect he would have (as described in the post above), leave it in the source report, add a text element of P2_REPORT_SEARCH, and a button "submit" on page 2 and experimenting to find different values of the element and clicking on the submit button...

How to select only the part by using the sql query

Hello
I have the task to retrieve only the integral of the input text by using the sql query.
The entry is as follows
Entry for the price setting
$12.5 (FYI without space)
$ 12.5 (FYI single space)
$ 12.5 (double space FYI)
$12.5 (FYI multiple space)
$12.5 (FYI multiple space)
Output expected of 12.5
The price is the type varchar2 column in the store_price table.
Please let me know how to achieve this.
Thanks in advance.

If this is always the case that you get a $ followed by a number of places, you can use something like:

Select to_number (ltrim ('$ 12.5',' $')) DOUBLE

or

SELECT ltrim ('$ 12.5',' $') OF double

but take care of your nls_numeric_character settings if they are defined so that, for example, a comma is the decimal separator, you will have a problem.

HTH

'||' Operator in the sql query
Hi all
We use the "|" operator in the sql query. Under the terms of the performance, it's beneficial or not?
Please suggest me.

Select * from EMP
where (ename | empno) in ('xxx' | 'yyyy')

Thanks in advance...
```
Select * from emp
where (ename||empno) in ('xxx'||'yyyy')
```
What is the reason using the ' |'?

Similar results could be achieved by article AND only
```
Select * from emp
where ename = 'xxx'
and empno = 'yyyy'
```

Export as .xls. Classic report type: SQL (body of function from PL/SQL returning the SQL) query

Hey guys,.
I'm using version 4.2.6 apex. The theme is 26.
IM also using Listener Oracle APEX.
I can print my classic report in PDF or CSV format.
But I need to export it as a .xls extension.
Report type: SQL (body of function from PL/SQL returning the SQL) query
I need is like this cause my 'where' clause type is dynamic.

Look at using this method: Tom's Blog: a non-standard export excel 2010 (.xlsx)

I do something similar for downloads to excel in my projects...

Thank you

Tony Miller
Software LuvMuffin
Ruckersville, WILL

Need help in the sql query

Hi all
Here is the sql query,
Select papf.employee_number,
-papf.full_name, ppa.effective_date, pp.payroll_name,
PET.element_name,
PIV. Name input_value,
prrv.result_value
-, ppa.payroll_action_id, ppa.time_period_id
Of
Apps.pay_payroll_actions App,
pay_assignment_actions AAP,
pay_payrolls_f pp,
pay_run_results prr,
prrv pay_run_result_values,
pay_input_values_f piv,
animal pay_element_types_f,
Apps.per_all_assignments_f ADP,
Apps.per_all_people_f women's wear
-where ppa.payroll_action_id =: payroll_action_id - give your payroll_action_id
where ppa.payroll_id =: payroll_id
and ppa.payroll_action_id =: payroll_action_id
- and paa.assignment_action_id =: assignment_action_id
and ppa.payroll_action_id = paa.payroll_action_id
and ppa.payroll_id = pp.payroll_id
and paa.assignment_action_id = prr.assignment_action_id
and prr.run_result_id = prrv.run_result_id
and prrv.input_value_id = piv.input_value_id
and piv.element_type_id = pet.element_type_id
and paaf.assignment_id = paa.assignment_id
and paaf.person_id = papf.person_id
and trunc (sysdate) between pp.effective_start_date and pp.effective_end_date
and trunc (sysdate) between pet.effective_start_date and pet.effective_end_date
and trunc (sysdate) between piv.effective_start_date and piv.effective_end_date
and trunc (sysdate) between paaf.effective_start_date and paaf.effective_end_date
and trunc (sysdate) between papf.effective_start_date and papf.effective_end_date
- and papf.employee_number = '1'
- and ppa.effective_date = July 22, 2014"
and pet.element_name in ('Local Mission allowance', "Compensation of Mission International")
order by 1.3
The result is:
Employee_number Element_Name Input_Value Result_value
1 compensation of Mission international day amount 1000
1 compensation of international Mission Distance days 4
1 value to pay compensation of 1200 International Mission
1 International Mission allowance Start Date 01/01/2014
1 compensation of Mission international day amount 800
1 compensation of international Mission Distance days 10
1 International Mission allowance pay value 2000
1 International Mission allowance Start Date 01/02/2014
1 compensation of Mission local day amount 500
1 compensation of local Mission Distance days 10
1 Mission allowance paid local value 1000
1 compensation of local Mission Start Date 01/11/2014
Desired output:
Employee_number Element_Name Day_Amount Distance_Days Pay_Value Start_Date
1 compensation of international Mission 1000, 1200 4 2014/01/01
1
International Mission allowance 800 10 2000 01/02/2014
1 Mission local compensation 500 10 1000 01/11/2014
Please suggest.
INSERT statement:
TOGETHER TO DEFINE
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('1', 'International Mission allowance', 'Day amount', '1000');
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('1', 'International Mission allowance', 'Day amount', '1000');
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('1', 'International Mission allowance', 'number of orders', '196');
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('1', 'International Mission allowance', 'number of orders', '195');
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('1', 'International Mission allowance', ' Distance days, 4 ");
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('1', 'International Mission allowance', ' Distance days, 1 ");
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
("1', 'International Mission allowance', 'employee Category", "scale of employment medical cities");
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
("1', 'International Mission allowance', 'employee Category", "scale of employment medical cities");
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('1', 'International Mission allowance', 'Class level', 'G3');
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('1', 'International Mission allowance', 'Class level', 'G3');
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('1', 'International Mission allowance', 'class of employment, ' ');
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('1', 'International Mission allowance', 'class of employment, ' ');
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('1', 'International Mission allowance', 'Country of Mission', ' 3003 - Kuwait ");
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('1', 'International Mission allowance', 'Country of Mission', ' 2004 - Canada ");
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('1', 'International Mission allowance', ' Mission days, 4' ");
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('1', 'International Mission allowance', ' Mission days, 3' ");
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('1', 'compensation of Mission international","End of Mission Date"' 2014/07/10 00:00:00 ');
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('1', 'compensation of Mission international","End of Mission Date"' 2014/07/19 00:00:00 ');
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('1', 'compensation of Mission international", 'Mission Start Date', ' 2014/07/07 00:00:00 ');
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('1', 'compensation of Mission international", 'Mission Start Date', ' 2014/07/17 00:00:00 ');
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('1', 'International Mission allowance', 'value of pay', '3000');
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('1', 'International Mission allowance', 'value of pay', '4000');
00:00 ');
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('70', 'Local Mission allowance', 'number of orders', '45');
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('70', 'Local Mission allowance', 'number of orders', "456789");
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('70 ', 'local Mission allowance', ' away days '0' ");
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('70 ', 'local Mission allowance', ' Distance days, 1 ");
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('70 ', 'local Mission allowance', 'Provided food', 'Y');
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('70', 'compensation of local Mission","Accommodation provided", 'Y');
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('70', 'compensation of local Mission","Accommodation provided", 'Y');
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('70 ', "local Mission allowance", "Mission City", "AL MEDINA");
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('70 ', "local Mission allowance", "Mission City", "RIYADH");
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('70 ', 'local Mission allowance', ' Mission days, 4' ");
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('70 ', 'local Mission allowance', ' Mission days, 5' ");
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('70', 'Local Mission allowance', 'End of Mission Date' ' 2014/06/16 00:00:00 ');
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('70', 'Local Mission allowance', 'End of Mission Date' ' 2014-06-14 00:00:00 ');
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('70', 'Local Mission allowance', 'Mission Start Date', ' 2014/06/13 00:00:00 ');
Insert into APPS. PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F
(EMPLOYEE_NUMBER, NOM_ELEMENT, INPUT_VALUE, RESULT_VALUE)
Values
('70', 'Local Mission allowance', 'Mission Start Date', ' 2014/06/10 00:00:00 ');
Thank you very much in advance.
Kind regards
Afzal.

So then... something like this:

SELECT employee_number

element_name

MAX (decode (input_value, 'Day amount', result_value)) AS day_amount

MAX (decode (input_value, 'Days of Distance', result_value)) AS Distance_Days

, MAX (decode (input_value, 'Value of pay', result_value)) AS Pay_Value

MAX (decode (input_value, 'Start Date', result_value)) AS Start_Date

from (SELECT papf.employee_number

pet.element_name

piv.NAME input_value

prrv.result_value

prrv.run_result_id

OF apps.pay_payroll_actions App

pay_assignment_actions PAA

pay_payrolls_f pp

pay_run_results prr

pay_run_result_values prrv

pay_input_values_f piv

pay_element_types_f pet

apps.per_all_assignments_f ADP

apps.per_all_people_f women's wear

-where ppa.payroll_action_id =: payroll_action_id - give your payroll_action_id

WHERE ppa.payroll_id =: payroll_id

AND ppa.payroll_action_id =: payroll_action_id

- and paa.assignment_action_id =: assignment_action_id

AND ppa.payroll_action_id = paa.payroll_action_id

AND ppa.payroll_id = pp.payroll_id

AND paa.assignment_action_id = prr.assignment_action_id

AND prr.run_result_id = prrv.run_result_id

AND prrv.input_value_id = piv.input_value_id

AND piv.element_type_id = pet.element_type_id

AND paaf.assignment_id = paa.assignment_id

AND paaf.person_id = papf.person_id

AND trunc (sysdate) BETWEEN pp.effective_start_date AND pp.effective_end_date

AND trunc (sysdate) BETWEEN pet.effective_start_date AND pet.effective_end_date

AND trunc (sysdate) BETWEEN piv.effective_start_date AND piv.effective_end_date

AND trunc (sysdate) BETWEEN paaf.effective_start_date AND paaf.effective_end_date

AND trunc (sysdate) BETWEEN papf.effective_start_date AND papf.effective_end_date

AND pet.element_name IN ('local Mission allowance', 'International Mission'))

GROUP BY employee_number

element_name

run_result_id

;

You should get your desired result.

Roger

CFGFWK-60850: the Test failed! CFGFWK-60853: A connection to the database, but no lines have been returned to the examination of the SQL query.

Hi all..
It's SOA 11.1.1.7... I created the schema and storage via RCU but when I try to configure JDBS schema components... his throw this error:
CFGFWK-60850: the Test failed!
CFGFWK-60853: A connection to the database, but no lines have been returned to the examination of the SQL query.
I created 3 users of UCR and who were all successful, because I have no error... of these three alone is managed in the configuration tree SOA...
No idea why like that...
Thank you
Aerts

This that I solved it by installing EMP 11.1.2.2 with UCR and SOA 11.1.1.6...

the SQL query result format

Format the results of the SQL query, currently, show as below.
Select license_type, correspondents of license_info where license_type in ('TEM', 'TDM') order by license_type;
TDM 1445140800000000000
TDM 1420952400000000000
TDM 1444363200000000000
TDM 1445054400000000000
TDM 1428724800000000000
TEM 1421125200000000000
TEM 1423890000000000000
TEM 1449637200000000000
TEM 1444968000000000000
TEM 1428724800000000000
I need formatting like below
Expected result:
TDM 1445140800000000000 TEM 1421125200000000000
TDM 1420952400000000000 TEM 1423890000000000000
TDM 1444363200000000000 TEM 1449637200000000000
TDM 1445054400000000000 TEM 1444968000000000000
TDM 1428724800000000000 TEM 1428724800000000000

I have sample data only, Blue said the change in your main table request

Try:

Select max (f1),

Max (F2),

Max (F3),

Max (F4)

de)

Select decode (license_type, 'TDM' license_type) f1,

Decode (license_type, 'TDM', expiration_date) f2,

Decode (license_type, 'TEM' license_type) f3,

Decode (license_type, 'TEM', expiration_date) f4,

ROW_NUMBER() over (partition by order correspondents license_type) r

Of

)

R group

----

Ramin Hashimzade

Projects	Participants
1	31 S
2	41
3	19
4	3
5	3
6	1
7	2

Performance problem - generating the SQL query

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for