PL/SQL table

Similar Questions

• Nested PL/sql tables passing of ADF

  Hi all

  I'm moving a nested pl/sql table parameter of adf for the stored procedure.

  I have the following code to bind the variable in my AMImpl

  ArrayDescriptor desc = ArrayDescriptor.createDescriptor ("STATION_FEATURES_T", st.getConnection ());

  TABLE array = new ARRAY (desc, st.getConnection (), stationFeatures);

  For the first time, the code runs successfully. However, on the call to the AMImpl method even once, the ArrayDescriptor.createDescriptor get the following error:

  java.lang.ClassCastException: oracle.jdbc.proxy.oracle$ $1jdbc $1replay $1driver $1NonTxnReplayableBase $2oracle $1jdbc $1OracleTypeMetaData Array$ $$Proxy cannot be cast to oracle.sql.ArrayDescriptor

  I checked that the connection object is done correctly both times.

  I also tried to set the setting force = true in ArrayDescriptor.createDescriptor to replace any descriptor be cached.

  Pointers would be much appreciated.

  You must mention jdev version because there are changes in the ojdbc7 driver (jdev 12 c +).

  For example, this (old) approach with ArrayDescriptor.createDescriptor () is deprecated in favour of factory of conn.createOracleArray () or conn.createARRAY () methods.

  Also, how do you get 'st' object?

  Dario

• Calling PL/SQL table...

  I have a procedure called from a package that returns all the data, the package uses a PL/SQL table that I do not know HOW to call or values that I would need to run the XXINV_PWB_HIST_FCST_PUB. XXINV_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL (structure) with in the package, can someone tell me how it's done?

  Call package is downstairs, the record structure is less than the package call.

  DECLARE

  P_ITEM_NUMBER VARCHAR2 (200);

  DATE OF P_CURRENT_DATE;

  X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL APPS. XXINV_PWB_HIST_FCST_PUB. XXINV_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL;

  BEGIN

  P_ITEM_NUMBER: = NULL;

  P_CURRENT_DATE: = NULL;

  -Modify the code to initialize the variable

  -X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL: = NULL;

  XXINV_PWB_HIST_FCST_PUB. () GET_ORG_DETAILS

  P_ITEM_NUMBER = > 91,

  P_CURRENT_DATE = > 2 February 2014 ",

  X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL = > X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL (which values should I put in the section)

  );

  Legacy release:

  DBMS_OUTPUT. PUT_LINE ('X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL =' |) X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL);

  -: X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL: = X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL;

  END;

  TYPE XXINV_PWB_Hist_Tbl IS TABLE OF THE XXINV_PWB_Hist_Rec

  INDEX OF DIRECTORY;

  TYPE XXINV_PWB_Org_Hist_Rec IS RECORD

  (

  Org_Hist_Index_Id NUMBER: = ".

  Item_Number Varchar2 (30): = ".

  Number of Quantity_1: = ".

  Number of Quantity_2: = ".

  Number of Quantity_3: = ".

  Number of Quantity_4: = ".

  Number of Quantity_5: = ".

  Number of Quantity_6: = ".

  Number of Quantity_7: = ".

  Number of Quantity_Total: = ".

  Date of Date_History: = ".

  Month_Year Varchar2 (15): = ".

  Number of Quantity_8: = ");

  Sorry I'm not familiar with PL/SQL tables...

  Thank you

  Help

  I can't go through your entire code. From there, you no need to use this plsql don't table as an input parameter because you do not pass anything... You're just fill with your values hard-coded... Then you can try the below stated

  DECLARE

  -declare the plsql table

  X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL APPS. XXINV_PWB_HIST_FCST_PUB. XXINV_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL;

  BEGIN

  XXINV_PWB_HIST_FCST_PUB. GET_ORG_DETAILS (91, TO_DATE('02-FEB-2014','DD-MON-YYYY'), X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL);

  -The legacy output:

  BECAUSE me in X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL. FIRST... X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL. LAST

  LOOP

  -Add all columns to dbms_output print and test values

  DBMS_OUTPUT. PUT_LINE ('X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL =' |) X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL (i). Org_Hist_Index_Id | «, » || X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL (i). Item_Number);

  END LOOP;

  END;

• How to execute a SQL statement that is stored within a SQL Table

  Hello

  If someone please help me with the following problem I would be eternally grateful

  I have a SQL statement that is stored inside a certain SQL table, I want to use this SQL statement inside my PL/SQL procedure.

  Thought a simple solution was to get the SQL statement in a table, and then run it, but how could I do so exactly with PL/SQL? I only started to play with PL/SQL in the last days.

  Thanks in advance!

  This is what it looks like more or less:

  Display result for:

  ---------------------

  SELECT TRIM (OBJ_VALU_TXT)

  OF OBJ_VALU_DOC

  WHERE TYPE_OBJET = 'FLD '.

  AND OBJECT_CODE = 15443

  AND OBJ_VALU_CD = 'CAB '.

  ORDER BYDOC_SEQ_NO

  00001

  ------------------------------------------------------------------

  SELECT

  VALUE (MAX (RECEIPT_NO) + 1,: OUT-COMP-FACTOR)

  THE FRONT DESK

  WHERE (RECEIPT_NO BETWEEN

  (: OUT-COMP-FACTOR AND: OUT TO A NUMBER) OR

  (RECEIPT_NO >: OUT-COMP-FACTOR AND)

  (: OUT-TO-NUMBER = 0)

  Here's a demo of your condition.

  create table t (col1 varchar2 (200));

  table created

  insert into values t ('select * from double ');

  1 row inserted

  declare
  v_col varchar2 (200);
  v_val varchar2 (200);
  Start

  Select col1 in t v_col;

  run immediately v_col in v_val;
  dbms_output.put_line (v_val);
  end;

  -----
  X

  Use in the clause, you can use as many variables as needed. But the basic approach remains the same.

  But storage in DB SQL is not an efficient design.

  Ishan

• SOA calling a MS SQL table to insert data.

  Hello
  I configured a XA driver to insert data into the MS SQL Server table. When I execute the stream with a SOAP user interface. I was able to insert the data from MS SQL table. But in the end, the transaction is rolled back.
  
  
  I would ask you
  < soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv = 'http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/' xmlns:mvn = "http://xmlns.oracle.com/MVNEIDM/MVNESelfRegistration/MVNESelfRegistration" >
  < soapenv:Header / >
  < soapenv:Body >
  < mvn:MVNESelfRegistrationRequest >
  < mvn:subscriberId > 12345 < / mvn:subscriberId >
  < mvn:Keyword > 456 < / mvn:Keyword >
  < mvn:completionDt > 2013-02-06 T 16: 24:06.952 < / mvn:completionDt >
  < mvn:expirationdt > 2013-02-06 T 16: 24:06.952 < / mvn:expirationdt >
  < / mvn:MVNESelfRegistrationRequest >
  < / soapenv:Body >
  < / soapenv:Envelope >
  
  
  Erros on SOAP UI are:
  
  < env:Envelope = "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:env >
  < env:Header / >
  < env:Body >
  < env:Fault >
  env:Server < faultcode > < / faultcode >
  incorrect object name < faultstring > [FMWGEN] [SQLServer JDBC Driver] [SQL Server] ' dbo. SelfRegistration'. < / faultstring >
  < faultactor / >
  < detail >
  < exception / >
  < / details >
  < / env:Fault >
  < / env:Body >
  < / env:Envelope >
  
  The managed server log the error is
  
  
  Form weblogic server: -.
  Error committing transaction:; nested exception is: Exception [EclipseLink-4002] (Eclipse - 2.1.3.v20110304 persistence Services - r9073): org.eclipse.persistence.exceptions.DatabaseException internal Exception: weblogic.jdbc.sqlserverbase.ddc: invalid object name [FMWGEN] [SQLServer JDBC Driver] [SQL Server] ' dbo. SelfRegistration'. Error code: 208
  
  
  The process ends with an error, but why he is rolling abck the transaction at the end. The table of the object was existing in the database and I traced the table to insert the data from the input variable reception to invoke the input variable. BPEL Instance he executed until the end, but in the end, the transaction is rolled back.
  
  Thank you
  Newcomer Raja

  Invalid object name ' dbo. SelfRegistration'

  I'm assuming you can see a SelfRegistration table in your database... So, I guess that BOD is not the name of the diagram on the right...

• Performance issue Bulk Insert PL/SQL table type

  Hi all
  
  I put in work of a batch to fill a table with a large number of data records(>3,000,000). To reduce the execution time, I used PL/SQL tables to temporarily store data that must be written to the destination table. Once all documents are piling up in the PL/SQL table I use a FORALL operator for bulk insert the records in the physical table.
  
  Currently, I follow two approaches to implement the process described above. (Please see the code segments below). I need to choose how to best wise performance between these two approaches. I really appreciate all the comments of experts about the runtime of the two approaches.
  
  (I don't see much difference in consumption of time in my test environment that has limited the data series. This process involves building a complex set of structures of large product once deployed in the production environment).
  
  
  Approach I:_
  DECLARE
  TYPE of test_type IS test_tab % ROWTYPE directory INDEX TABLE;
  test_type_ test_type.
  ins_idx_ NUMBER;
  BEGIN
  ins_idx_: = 1;
  NESTED LOOPS
  test_type_ (ins_idx_) .column1: = value1;
  test_type_ (ins_idx_) .column2: = value2;
  test_type_ (ins_idx_) .column3: = value3;
  ins_idx_: = ins_idx_ + 1;
  END LOOP;
  
  I_ FORALL in 1.test_type_. COUNTY
  INSERT INTO test_tab VALUES (i_) test_type_;
  END;
  /
  
  
  Approach II:_
  DECLARE
  Column1 IS a TABLE OF TYPE test_tab.column1%TYPE INDEX DIRECTORY.
  Column2 IS a TABLE OF TYPE test_tab.column2%TYPE INDEX DIRECTORY.
  Column3 IS a TABLE OF TYPE test_tab.column3%TYPE INDEX DIRECTORY.
  column1 column1_;
  column2_ Column2;
  column3_ Column3;
  ins_idx_ NUMBER;
  BEGIN
  ins_idx_: = 1;
  NESTED LOOPS
  column1_ (ins_idx_): = value1;
  column2_ (ins_idx_): = value2;
  column3_ (ins_idx_): = value3;
  ins_idx_: = ins_idx_ + 1;
  END LOOP;
  
  FORALL idx_ in 1.column1_. COUNTY
  INSERT
  IN n_part_cost_bucket_tab)
  Column1,
  Column2,
  Column3)
  VALUES)
  column1_ (idx_),
  column2_ (idx_),
  column3_ (idx_));
  END;
  /
  
  Best regards
  Lorenzo
  
  Published by: nipuna86 on January 3, 2013 22:23

  nipuna86 wrote:

  I put in work of a batch to fill a table with a large number of data records(>3,000,000). To reduce the execution time, I used PL/SQL tables to temporarily store data that must be written to the destination table. Once all documents are piling up in the PL/SQL table I use a FORALL operator for bulk insert the records in the physical table.

  Performance is more than just reducing the execution time.

  Just as smashing a car stops more than a car in the fastest possible time.

  If it was (breaking a car stopping all simply), then a brick with reinforced concrete wall construction, would have been the perfect way to stop all types of all sorts of speed motor vehicles.

  Only problem (well more than one actually) is that stop a vehicle in this way is bad for the car, the engine, the driver, passengers and any other content inside.

  And pushing 3 million records in a PL/SQL 'table' (btw, that is a WRONG terminology - there no PL/SQL table structure) in order to run a SQL cursor INSERT 3 million times, to reduce the execution times, is no different than using a brick wall to stop a car.

  Both approaches are pretty well imperfect. Both places an unreasonable demand on the memory of the PGA. Both are still row-by-row (aka slow-by-slow) treatment.

• Is it possible to use the record type or a PL/SQL table in the Select statement

  Hi all
  
  My requirement is that.
  I want to write a query and write a function, function, I want to return multiple columns at the same time in a Select statement.
  I select the return values in the Select no statement in a PL/SQL block.
  Is it possible to use the PL/SQL Table or Variable of Type record, or any other method in the statement Select?
  
  Please help me understand the solution.
  
  
  Kind regards

  830960 wrote:
  do we like it?

  In general, Yes, if the function is a function table, you can do something like:

  select  t.col1,
          t.col2,
          f.col1,
          f.col2,
          f.col3
    from  table_name t,
             table(some_table_function(param1,...paramN)) f
  /
  

  SY.

• Dimension to build using the SQL table and process to populate the SQL table

  I have a dimension in a cube that is manually* built by one of our power users. Now, I have to get all the information of members of this dimension in a SQL table (example: with columns... Level0, level0property, level1, level1property etc...) to use this table in the STUDIO for the responsibility of the Member.
  
  Is there any easy process to do this? Currently I am building each line manually in the SQL table and there are 1100 + members in that manually built dimension. Please advice.

  Look at the outline of applied olap Extractor is a free utility

• PL/SQL tables

  Hello guys,.
  I have a few questions about the PL/SQL tables
  
  (1) if I don't specify the 'INDEX BY' clause, they are indexed by PLS_INTEGER default, right?
  
  (2) consider this package specification
  

  CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE Testxyz AS
  
  TYPE tab_Numbers IS TABLE OF PLS_INTEGER;
  
  PROCEDURE TestNumber(ptab_Numbers IN tab_Numbers := NULL);
  
  
  END Testxyz;

  So I created a table (I hope it's standard indexed by type of data pls_integer) and I am in him passing as parameter to a procedure. Because I want this parameter be optional I assign null inside.
  
  Now, I change the table definition for:
  

  CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE Testxyz AS
  
  TYPE tab_Numbers IS TABLE OF PLS_INTEGER INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;
  
  PROCEDURE TestNumber(ptab_Numbers IN tab_Numbers := NULL);
  
  
  END Testxyz;

  Try to compile it and you get:
  Error (5.53): PLS-00382: expression is of the wrong type
  
  Why?
  
  (3) because I need this optional parameter, I use the first statement:
  

  CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE Testxyz AS
  
  TYPE tab_Numbers IS TABLE OF PLS_INTEGER;
  
  PROCEDURE TestNumber(ptab_Numbers IN tab_Numbers := NULL);
  
  
  END Testxyz;

  Now I create an anonymous block, and you want to set something in the table
  

  DECLARE
     vtab_Numbers TESTXYZ.tab_Numbers;
  BEGIN
  
     vtab_Numbers(1) := 5;
  
  
  END;
  /

  When you try to run it, I got:
  06531 00000 - 'refers to an uninitialized collection.
  
  Can someone help me understand this problem?
  Is it possible to have input of type PL/SQL table setting and have a standard null, are assigned?
  
  Thanks, Dan

  (1) if I don't specify the 'INDEX BY' clause, they are indexed by PLS_INTEGER default, right?

  N ° or somehow.

  More critical, and using official terms of [url http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/appdev.112/e25519/composites.htm#CHDBHJEI] documentation so that we don't get into unnecessary arguments about the correct terms for these features, it's the difference between types of ASSOCIATIVE TABLE and the IMBRIQUEE TABLE collection.

  If you omit the "INDEX BY" clause, it is a type of TABLE IMBRIQUEE collection. A type of TABLE IMBRIQUEE is always indexed by PLS_INTEGER.

  When you include the ' INDEX OF ', this is an ASSOCIATIVE ARRAY.

  (2) consider this package specification
  Try to compile it and you get:
  Error (5.53): PLS-00382: expression is of the wrong type

  Why?

  Because you cannot assign NULL to an ASSOCIATIVE ARRAY.

  In the same way, you cannot do this:

  SQL> DECLARE
    2   TYPE tab_Numbers IS TABLE OF PLS_INTEGER INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;
    3   v1 tab_Numbers;
    4  BEGIN
    5   v1 := NULL;
    6  END;
    7  /
   v1 := NULL;
         *
  ERROR at line 5:
  ORA-06550: line 5, column 8:
  PLS-00382: expression is of wrong type
  ORA-06550: line 5, column 2:
  PL/SQL: Statement ignored
  
  SQL> 
  

  If you want two entry points to TestNumber with an ASSOCIATIVE ARRAY or NULL then overload the procedure.

  If you want to call a procedure with a TABLE IMBRIQUE collection type you can the default empty:

  SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE Testxyz
    2  AS
    3   TYPE tab_Numbers IS TABLE OF PLS_INTEGER;
    4   PROCEDURE TestNumber(ptab_Numbers IN tab_Numbers DEFAULT tab_Numbers());
    5   PROCEDURE TestNumber;
    6  END Testxyz;
    7  /
  
  Package created.
  
  SQL> 
  

  (3) because I need this optional parameter, I use the first statement
  When you try to run it, I got:
  06531 00000 - 'refers to an uninitialized collection.

  Because you have not initialized it.

  Different collection types require different semantics.

  SQL> DECLARE
    2   TYPE tab_Numbers IS TABLE OF PLS_INTEGER;
    3   v1 tab_Numbers;
    4  BEGIN
    5   v1(1) := 5;
    6  END;
    7  /
  DECLARE
  *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-06531: Reference to uninitialized collection
  ORA-06512: at line 5
  
  SQL> DECLARE
    2   TYPE tab_Numbers IS TABLE OF PLS_INTEGER;
    3   v1 tab_Numbers := tab_Numbers();
    4  BEGIN
    5   v1(1) := 5;
    6  END;
    7  /
  DECLARE
  *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-06533: Subscript beyond count
  ORA-06512: at line 5
  
  SQL> DECLARE
    2   TYPE tab_Numbers IS TABLE OF PLS_INTEGER;
    3   v1 tab_Numbers := tab_Numbers();
    4  BEGIN
    5   v1.extend();
    6   v1(1) := 5;
    7  END;
    8  /
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  
  SQL> 
  

• Help with PL/SQL table

  Hi all
  
  Newbie when it comes to PL/SQL tables...
  
  Can someone explain to me why it works and how exactly I can do the following without triggering an error?
  
  I have a function that accepts a PL/SQL table like in parameter.
  
  The PL/SQL table is defined as...
  

  Type TTimeTable is table of xxtzg_otl_iface_stg%rowtype index by binary_integer;

  the xxtzg_otl_iface_stg table has many columns including error_message and error_flag. If I find an error, I want to update the error_message and error_flag function. If I can get it works I will then modify the function to return to the table of PL/SQL instead of BOOLEAN
  

  FUNCTION validate_timecard (pTimeTable IN TTimeTable
                                               ) RETURN BOOLEAN IS
  
    lc_module            CONSTANT VARCHAR2(25)        := 'validate_timecard';
    lEmployeeCount    PLS_INTEGER;
    lEmployeeError     VARCHAR2(1000);
    lErrorCount          PLS_INTEGER :=0;
    
    BEGIN
  
       FOR i IN 1 .. NVL(pTimeTable.COUNT,0) LOOP                                   
                                           
       xxtzg_concurrent_utils_pkg.write_log(  p_package =>  gc_package
                                                              , p_module  =>  lc_module
                                                              , p_text    =>  'Processing timecard for employee_number: '||pTimeTable(1).employee_number
                                                             );               
     
       -- Call validations before submitting the timecard to the API
       --validate employee
  
          begin
             select count(*)
               into lEmployeeCount
               from per_all_people_f
              where employee_number = pTimeTable(1).employee_number;
              
              if lEmployeeCount = 0 then
              
              -- Set the errors
  
              -- This assignment below does not work, I get an error message saying...
              --[Error] PLS-00363 (137: 27): PLS-00363: expression 'PTIMETABLE.ERROR_MESSAGE' cannot be used as an assignment target
  
              PTimeTable(i).error_message :=  'Employee Number '||pTimeTable(1).employee_number||' is not a valid employee';
              PTimeTable(i).error_flag := 'Y';
  
              end if;
              
          end;    
          
       END LOOP; 
       
       IF lErrorCount = 0 THEN 
       RETURN TRUE;
       ELSE
       RETURN FALSE;
       END IF;
                                             
    END;

  blue72TA wrote:

  FUNCTION validate_timecard (pTimeTable IN TTimeTable
  ) RETURN BOOLEAN IS
  ...
  
  -- This assignment below does not work, I get an error message saying...
  --[Error] PLS-00363 (137: 27): PLS-00363: expression 'PTIMETABLE.ERROR_MESSAGE' cannot be used as an assignment target
  
  PTimeTable(i).error_message :=  'Employee Number '||pTimeTable(1).employee_number||' is not a valid employee';
  PTimeTable(i).error_flag := 'Y';
  

  Your table is declared as IN only (the default if you do not explicitly set it), so you are not allowed to change its attributes in all respects, IN = read-only.

  If you want to be able to modify the values of a parameter, it must be declared as OUT parameters.

• Variable from PL/SQL table?

  Hello
  
  I need to process some data in PL/SQL.
  The first thing I would do, is to write a query that collects all the mydata from different tables in exactly one table on which I can make simple queries.
  
  What is the preferred way to do this?
  Temporary table, or view, or something else?
  
  I would preffer not not to create the physical table for this. I want to use only a PL/SQL variable.
  
  Thank you

  user610868 wrote:
  Hello

  Thanks for your advice, but I would still do it.
  Is it possible or not? (fully searchable custom table in a PL/SQL variable)

  Yes and no.
  Yes, it is possible to get all your data and put it in a PL/SQL 'table' (better known as an array or a collection, because they are not tables)
  No, you will not be able to 'interrogate' the data in this array/collection, simply because there isn't a table, and SQL will not work against it.

  You can do all kinds of PL/SQL code to process the data in the table or the collection to simulate what would do SQL, but it will be several times slower than that of SQL, and to be honest, no expert here is likely to give you code to do because it's just the wrong way to do things.

  If you can give a legitimate situation where you needed to load the data in a table or the collection in order to treat it, then of course someone can show you how to do this, but it is likely that most of the situations describe you would be better made using SQL tables from database etc..

• doubt in PL/SQL table

  If I said PL/SQL table and populated with 10 values.
  
  If I want to find a perticular values are in the list populated how can I find.say I have values from 1 to 10.
  and I want to find if 9 is in the list.
  I tried with loop. Is there another way. I use 10g.
  
  declare
  tr_nm number_array;
  i the number;
  Start
  I'm in 1.10
  loop
  tr_nm.extend;
  tr_nm (i): = i;
  end loop;
  for j from 1... tr_nm. Count
  loop
  If tr_nm (j) = 9 then
  i: = i + 1;
  end if;
  end loop;
  If i > 0 then
  null;
  end if;
  end;

  Please try this code
  Note: this code runs from 10 g.

  DECLARE
  type num_type is table of NUMBER;
  v_num_arr num_type;
  v_num number;
  v_var number :=9;
  BEGIN
  select level
  bulk collect into v_num_arr
  from dual connect by level <=10;
  
  dbms_output.put_line('Count - '||v_num_arr.count);
  
  if v_var member of v_num_arr then
   dbms_output.put_line('Found ');
  end if;
  
  END;
  

• What is the best TWG or Pl/Sql Table

  Hello
  
  One of the best MNC asked me a question. for example,.
  
  What is the global temporary Table table / b/w difference Pl/Sql? What is the best to maintain the data manipulations?
  
  
  Pls advise me... !!
  
  for example, it is very useful.
  
  Adv.Thanks
  Prabhu

  As usual if you search for it you would have found your answer at this time.

  He has already been asked here before and responded. The link is

  PL/SQL table for the TWG vs

  Concerning

  REDA

• Pl/sql table as an input parameter

  Hello.
  
  I need to know if it is possible to use a pl/sql table as an input parameter to a stored procedure in a package.
  
  Right now I ve compiled the procedure correctly, but when I try to call, I´ve-PLS-00330.
  
  EXAMPLE:
  This is the package:
  
  CREATING a PACKAGE test IS
  TYPE table_list IS TABLE OF VARCHAR2 (20) INDEX directory.
  PROCEDURE proc_test (list IN table_list);
  END TEST;
  /
  
  Test to CREATE THE PACKAGE BODY IS
  PROCEDURE proc_test IS
  BEGIN
  BECAUSE me IN the list. ... FIRST list. LAST
  LOOP
  DBMS_OUTPUT. Put_line (i);
  END LOOP;
  END proc_test;
  END test;
  /
  
  And I m trying to call with a block anonimous like this:
  
  BEGIN
  DECLARE
  TYPE ΠIS TABLE OF VARCHAR2 (20) INDEX directory.
  BEGIN
  call_list (1): = "my_record_1";
  call_list (2): = "my_record_2";
  call_list (3): = "my_record_3";
  test.proc_test (call_list);
  END;
  
  And then, I ve
  ORA-06550: line 8, column 2:
  PLS-00330: invalid use of the name of type or subtype
  
  Do you understand how I have to do?
  
  Thanks for your help.
  
  Respect of

  You call it with the type that you defined.

  BEGIN
  DECLARE
  call_list test.table_list := test.table_list();
  BEGIN
  call_list(1) := 'my_record_1';
  call_list(2) := 'my_record_2';
  call_list(3) := 'my_record_3';
  test.proc_test(call_list);
  END;
  

• How to find the second largest in a pl/sql table

  Hello friends,
  
  I want to find the first and second maximum items in a pl/sql table.
  
  Here's the code...
  
  DECLARE
  Max_earnings_type TYPE TABLE IS NUMBER;
  max_earnings_tab max_earnings_type: = max_earnings_type();
  number of v_count: = 0;
  number of v_max_earnings;
  
  
  Can someone give me how to find the maximum first max and second in the type of the given table.
  
  appreciate your help.
  
  Thank you/kumar
  
  Published by: kumar73 on October 21, 2010 09:42

  kumar73 wrote:

  When I tried to implement your logic in my application, I get the following error...

  PL/SQL: digital or value error: NULL index key value table

  What happens if the PL/SQL table has NULL values. Question is how you want to handle NULL values. You want to ignore nulls as GROUP BY do? If you want to consider NULL values, you can say if you want to order the NULLS FIRST or NULLS LAST. I guess that logical GROUP BY:

  DECLARE
      TYPE max_earnings_type IS TABLE OF NUMBER;
      TYPE max_earnings_sorted_type IS TABLE OF NUMBER
        INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
      max_earnings_tab        max_earnings_type;
      max_earnings_tab_sorted max_earnings_sorted_type;
  BEGIN
      SELECT  sal + comm
        BULK COLLECT
        INTO  max_earnings_tab
        FROM  emp;
      FOR v_i in 1..max_earnings_tab.count LOOP
        IF max_earnings_tab(v_i) IS NOT NULL
          THEN
            max_earnings_tab_sorted(max_earnings_tab(v_i)) := 1;
        END IF;
      END LOOP;
      DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('MAX value in PL/SQL table is ' || nvl(to_char(max_earnings_tab_sorted.last),'NULL'));
      DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Second MAX value in PL/SQL table is ' || nvl(to_char(max_earnings_tab_sorted.prior(max_earnings_tab_sorted.last)),'NULL'));
  END;
  /
  MAX value in PL/SQL table is 2650
  Second MAX value in PL/SQL table is 1900
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  
  SQL> SELECT  sal + comm
    2    FROM  emp;
  
    SAL+COMM
  ----------
  
        1900
        1750
  
        2650
  
        1500
  
    SAL+COMM
  ----------
  
  14 rows selected.
  
  SQL>
  

  SY.

• How to create a type of record and a pl/sql table of this record type in the database

  Hello
  I want to create a record type, and then I want to create a PL/SQL table in the oracle 9i database.
  I did block PL/SQL.
  But when I'm doing it in the database it throws me a few errors.
  Could you please tell me how can I do?
  
  Concerning

  user576726 wrote:
  Hello
  I want to create a record type, and then I want to create a PL/SQL table in the oracle 9i database.
  I did block PL/SQL.
  But when I'm doing it in the database it throws me a few errors.
  Could you please tell me how can I do?

  Concerning

  RECORD type is only supported in PL/SQL for SQL, you must use the OBJECT type.