Calling PL/SQL table...

I have a procedure called from a package that returns all the data, the package uses a PL/SQL table that I do not know HOW to call or values that I would need to run the XXINV_PWB_HIST_FCST_PUB. XXINV_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL (structure) with in the package, can someone tell me how it's done?

Call package is downstairs, the record structure is less than the package call.

DECLARE

P_ITEM_NUMBER VARCHAR2 (200);

DATE OF P_CURRENT_DATE;

X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL APPS. XXINV_PWB_HIST_FCST_PUB. XXINV_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL;

BEGIN

P_ITEM_NUMBER: = NULL;

P_CURRENT_DATE: = NULL;

-Modify the code to initialize the variable

-X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL: = NULL;

XXINV_PWB_HIST_FCST_PUB. () GET_ORG_DETAILS

P_ITEM_NUMBER = > 91,

P_CURRENT_DATE = > 2 February 2014 ",

X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL = > X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL (which values should I put in the section)

);

Legacy release:

DBMS_OUTPUT. PUT_LINE ('X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL =' |) X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL);

-: X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL: = X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL;

END;

TYPE XXINV_PWB_Hist_Tbl IS TABLE OF THE XXINV_PWB_Hist_Rec

INDEX OF DIRECTORY;

TYPE XXINV_PWB_Org_Hist_Rec IS RECORD

(

Org_Hist_Index_Id NUMBER: = ".

Item_Number Varchar2 (30): = ".

Number of Quantity_1: = ".

Number of Quantity_2: = ".

Number of Quantity_3: = ".

Number of Quantity_4: = ".

Number of Quantity_5: = ".

Number of Quantity_6: = ".

Number of Quantity_7: = ".

Number of Quantity_Total: = ".

Date of Date_History: = ".

Month_Year Varchar2 (15): = ".

Number of Quantity_8: = ");

Sorry I'm not familiar with PL/SQL tables...

Thank you

Help

I can't go through your entire code. From there, you no need to use this plsql don't table as an input parameter because you do not pass anything... You're just fill with your values hard-coded... Then you can try the below stated

DECLARE

-declare the plsql table

X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL APPS. XXINV_PWB_HIST_FCST_PUB. XXINV_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL;

BEGIN

XXINV_PWB_HIST_FCST_PUB. GET_ORG_DETAILS (91, TO_DATE('02-FEB-2014','DD-MON-YYYY'), X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL);

-The legacy output:

BECAUSE me in X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL. FIRST... X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL. LAST

LOOP

-Add all columns to dbms_output print and test values

DBMS_OUTPUT. PUT_LINE ('X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL =' |) X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL (i). Org_Hist_Index_Id | «, » || X_PWB_ORG_HIST_TBL (i). Item_Number);

END LOOP;

END;

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

  • SOA calling a MS SQL table to insert data.

    Hello
    I configured a XA driver to insert data into the MS SQL Server table. When I execute the stream with a SOAP user interface. I was able to insert the data from MS SQL table. But in the end, the transaction is rolled back.


    I would ask you
    < soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv = 'http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/' xmlns:mvn = "http://xmlns.oracle.com/MVNEIDM/MVNESelfRegistration/MVNESelfRegistration" >
    < soapenv:Header / >
    < soapenv:Body >
    < mvn:MVNESelfRegistrationRequest >
    < mvn:subscriberId > 12345 < / mvn:subscriberId >
    < mvn:Keyword > 456 < / mvn:Keyword >
    < mvn:completionDt > 2013-02-06 T 16: 24:06.952 < / mvn:completionDt >
    < mvn:expirationdt > 2013-02-06 T 16: 24:06.952 < / mvn:expirationdt >
    < / mvn:MVNESelfRegistrationRequest >
    < / soapenv:Body >
    < / soapenv:Envelope >


    Erros on SOAP UI are:

    < env:Envelope = "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:env >
    < env:Header / >
    < env:Body >
    < env:Fault >
    env:Server < faultcode > < / faultcode >
    incorrect object name < faultstring > [FMWGEN] [SQLServer JDBC Driver] [SQL Server] ' dbo. SelfRegistration'. < / faultstring >
    < faultactor / >
    < detail >
    < exception / >
    < / details >
    < / env:Fault >
    < / env:Body >
    < / env:Envelope >

    The managed server log the error is


    Form weblogic server: -.
    Error committing transaction:; nested exception is: Exception [EclipseLink-4002] (Eclipse - 2.1.3.v20110304 persistence Services - r9073): org.eclipse.persistence.exceptions.DatabaseException internal Exception: weblogic.jdbc.sqlserverbase.ddc: invalid object name [FMWGEN] [SQLServer JDBC Driver] [SQL Server] ' dbo. SelfRegistration'. Error code: 208


    The process ends with an error, but why he is rolling abck the transaction at the end. The table of the object was existing in the database and I traced the table to insert the data from the input variable reception to invoke the input variable. BPEL Instance he executed until the end, but in the end, the transaction is rolled back.

    Thank you
    Newcomer Raja

    Invalid object name ' dbo. SelfRegistration'

    I'm assuming you can see a SelfRegistration table in your database... So, I guess that BOD is not the name of the diagram on the right...

  • Nested PL/sql tables passing of ADF

    Hi all

    I'm moving a nested pl/sql table parameter of adf for the stored procedure.

    I have the following code to bind the variable in my AMImpl

    ArrayDescriptor desc = ArrayDescriptor.createDescriptor ("STATION_FEATURES_T", st.getConnection ());

    TABLE array = new ARRAY (desc, st.getConnection (), stationFeatures);

    For the first time, the code runs successfully. However, on the call to the AMImpl method even once, the ArrayDescriptor.createDescriptor get the following error:

    java.lang.ClassCastException: oracle.jdbc.proxy.oracle$ $1jdbc $1replay $1driver $1NonTxnReplayableBase $2oracle $1jdbc $1OracleTypeMetaData Array$ $$Proxy cannot be cast to oracle.sql.ArrayDescriptor

    I checked that the connection object is done correctly both times.

    I also tried to set the setting force = true in ArrayDescriptor.createDescriptor to replace any descriptor be cached.

    Pointers would be much appreciated.

    You must mention jdev version because there are changes in the ojdbc7 driver (jdev 12 c +).

    For example, this (old) approach with ArrayDescriptor.createDescriptor () is deprecated in favour of factory of conn.createOracleArray () or conn.createARRAY () methods.

    Also, how do you get 'st' object?

    Dario

  • PL/SQL tables

    Hello guys,.
    I have a few questions about the PL/SQL tables

    (1) if I don't specify the 'INDEX BY' clause, they are indexed by PLS_INTEGER default, right?

    (2) consider this package specification
    CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE Testxyz AS
    
    TYPE tab_Numbers IS TABLE OF PLS_INTEGER;
    
    PROCEDURE TestNumber(ptab_Numbers IN tab_Numbers := NULL);
    
    
    END Testxyz;
    So I created a table (I hope it's standard indexed by type of data pls_integer) and I am in him passing as parameter to a procedure. Because I want this parameter be optional I assign null inside.

    Now, I change the table definition for:
    CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE Testxyz AS
    
    TYPE tab_Numbers IS TABLE OF PLS_INTEGER INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;
    
    PROCEDURE TestNumber(ptab_Numbers IN tab_Numbers := NULL);
    
    
    END Testxyz;
    Try to compile it and you get:
    Error (5.53): PLS-00382: expression is of the wrong type

    Why?

    (3) because I need this optional parameter, I use the first statement:
    CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE Testxyz AS
    
    TYPE tab_Numbers IS TABLE OF PLS_INTEGER;
    
    PROCEDURE TestNumber(ptab_Numbers IN tab_Numbers := NULL);
    
    
    END Testxyz;
    Now I create an anonymous block, and you want to set something in the table
    DECLARE
       vtab_Numbers TESTXYZ.tab_Numbers;
    BEGIN
    
       vtab_Numbers(1) := 5;
    
    
    END;
    /
    When you try to run it, I got:
    06531 00000 - 'refers to an uninitialized collection.

    Can someone help me understand this problem?
    Is it possible to have input of type PL/SQL table setting and have a standard null, are assigned?

    Thanks, Dan

    (1) if I don't specify the 'INDEX BY' clause, they are indexed by PLS_INTEGER default, right?

    N ° or somehow.

    More critical, and using official terms of [url http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/appdev.112/e25519/composites.htm#CHDBHJEI] documentation so that we don't get into unnecessary arguments about the correct terms for these features, it's the difference between types of ASSOCIATIVE TABLE and the IMBRIQUEE TABLE collection.

    If you omit the "INDEX BY" clause, it is a type of TABLE IMBRIQUEE collection. A type of TABLE IMBRIQUEE is always indexed by PLS_INTEGER.

    When you include the ' INDEX OF ', this is an ASSOCIATIVE ARRAY.

    (2) consider this package specification
    Try to compile it and you get:
    Error (5.53): PLS-00382: expression is of the wrong type

    Why?

    Because you cannot assign NULL to an ASSOCIATIVE ARRAY.

    In the same way, you cannot do this:

    SQL> DECLARE
      2   TYPE tab_Numbers IS TABLE OF PLS_INTEGER INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;
      3   v1 tab_Numbers;
      4  BEGIN
      5   v1 := NULL;
      6  END;
      7  /
     v1 := NULL;
           *
    ERROR at line 5:
    ORA-06550: line 5, column 8:
    PLS-00382: expression is of wrong type
    ORA-06550: line 5, column 2:
    PL/SQL: Statement ignored
    
    SQL> 
    

    If you want two entry points to TestNumber with an ASSOCIATIVE ARRAY or NULL then overload the procedure.

    If you want to call a procedure with a TABLE IMBRIQUE collection type you can the default empty:

    SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE Testxyz
      2  AS
      3   TYPE tab_Numbers IS TABLE OF PLS_INTEGER;
      4   PROCEDURE TestNumber(ptab_Numbers IN tab_Numbers DEFAULT tab_Numbers());
      5   PROCEDURE TestNumber;
      6  END Testxyz;
      7  /
    
    Package created.
    
    SQL> 
    

    (3) because I need this optional parameter, I use the first statement
    When you try to run it, I got:
    06531 00000 - 'refers to an uninitialized collection.

    Because you have not initialized it.

    Different collection types require different semantics.

    SQL> DECLARE
      2   TYPE tab_Numbers IS TABLE OF PLS_INTEGER;
      3   v1 tab_Numbers;
      4  BEGIN
      5   v1(1) := 5;
      6  END;
      7  /
    DECLARE
    *
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-06531: Reference to uninitialized collection
    ORA-06512: at line 5
    
    SQL> DECLARE
      2   TYPE tab_Numbers IS TABLE OF PLS_INTEGER;
      3   v1 tab_Numbers := tab_Numbers();
      4  BEGIN
      5   v1(1) := 5;
      6  END;
      7  /
    DECLARE
    *
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-06533: Subscript beyond count
    ORA-06512: at line 5
    
    SQL> DECLARE
      2   TYPE tab_Numbers IS TABLE OF PLS_INTEGER;
      3   v1 tab_Numbers := tab_Numbers();
      4  BEGIN
      5   v1.extend();
      6   v1(1) := 5;
      7  END;
      8  /
    
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    
    SQL> 
    
  • Help with PL/SQL table

    Hi all

    Newbie when it comes to PL/SQL tables...

    Can someone explain to me why it works and how exactly I can do the following without triggering an error?

    I have a function that accepts a PL/SQL table like in parameter.

    The PL/SQL table is defined as...
    Type TTimeTable is table of xxtzg_otl_iface_stg%rowtype index by binary_integer;
    the xxtzg_otl_iface_stg table has many columns including error_message and error_flag. If I find an error, I want to update the error_message and error_flag function. If I can get it works I will then modify the function to return to the table of PL/SQL instead of BOOLEAN
    FUNCTION validate_timecard (pTimeTable IN TTimeTable
                                                 ) RETURN BOOLEAN IS
    
      lc_module            CONSTANT VARCHAR2(25)        := 'validate_timecard';
      lEmployeeCount    PLS_INTEGER;
      lEmployeeError     VARCHAR2(1000);
      lErrorCount          PLS_INTEGER :=0;
      
      BEGIN
    
         FOR i IN 1 .. NVL(pTimeTable.COUNT,0) LOOP                                   
                                             
         xxtzg_concurrent_utils_pkg.write_log(  p_package =>  gc_package
                                                                , p_module  =>  lc_module
                                                                , p_text    =>  'Processing timecard for employee_number: '||pTimeTable(1).employee_number
                                                               );               
       
         -- Call validations before submitting the timecard to the API
         --validate employee
    
            begin
               select count(*)
                 into lEmployeeCount
                 from per_all_people_f
                where employee_number = pTimeTable(1).employee_number;
                
                if lEmployeeCount = 0 then
                
                -- Set the errors
    
                -- This assignment below does not work, I get an error message saying...
                --[Error] PLS-00363 (137: 27): PLS-00363: expression 'PTIMETABLE.ERROR_MESSAGE' cannot be used as an assignment target
    
                PTimeTable(i).error_message :=  'Employee Number '||pTimeTable(1).employee_number||' is not a valid employee';
                PTimeTable(i).error_flag := 'Y';
    
                end if;
                
            end;    
            
         END LOOP; 
         
         IF lErrorCount = 0 THEN 
         RETURN TRUE;
         ELSE
         RETURN FALSE;
         END IF;
                                               
      END;

    blue72TA wrote:

    FUNCTION validate_timecard (pTimeTable IN TTimeTable
    ) RETURN BOOLEAN IS
    ...
    
    -- This assignment below does not work, I get an error message saying...
    --[Error] PLS-00363 (137: 27): PLS-00363: expression 'PTIMETABLE.ERROR_MESSAGE' cannot be used as an assignment target
    
    PTimeTable(i).error_message :=  'Employee Number '||pTimeTable(1).employee_number||' is not a valid employee';
    PTimeTable(i).error_flag := 'Y';
    

    Your table is declared as IN only (the default if you do not explicitly set it), so you are not allowed to change its attributes in all respects, IN = read-only.

    If you want to be able to modify the values of a parameter, it must be declared as OUT parameters.

  • Pl/sql table as an input parameter

    Hello.

    I need to know if it is possible to use a pl/sql table as an input parameter to a stored procedure in a package.

    Right now I ve compiled the procedure correctly, but when I try to call, I´ve-PLS-00330.

    EXAMPLE:
    This is the package:

    CREATING a PACKAGE test IS
    TYPE table_list IS TABLE OF VARCHAR2 (20) INDEX directory.
    PROCEDURE proc_test (list IN table_list);
    END TEST;
    /

    Test to CREATE THE PACKAGE BODY IS
    PROCEDURE proc_test IS
    BEGIN
    BECAUSE me IN the list. ... FIRST list. LAST
    LOOP
    DBMS_OUTPUT. Put_line (i);
    END LOOP;
    END proc_test;
    END test;
    /

    And I m trying to call with a block anonimous like this:

    BEGIN
    DECLARE
    TYPE ΠIS TABLE OF VARCHAR2 (20) INDEX directory.
    BEGIN
    call_list (1): = "my_record_1";
    call_list (2): = "my_record_2";
    call_list (3): = "my_record_3";
    test.proc_test (call_list);
    END;

    And then, I ve
    ORA-06550: line 8, column 2:
    PLS-00330: invalid use of the name of type or subtype

    Do you understand how I have to do?

    Thanks for your help.

    Respect of

    You call it with the type that you defined.

    BEGIN
    DECLARE
    call_list test.table_list := test.table_list();
    BEGIN
    call_list(1) := 'my_record_1';
    call_list(2) := 'my_record_2';
    call_list(3) := 'my_record_3';
    test.proc_test(call_list);
    END;
    
  • sort a pl/sql table

    Hi experts,
    Could you please tell me how can I put all the ename column table emp in a work table pl/sql and display of the enmae in a sorted order.

    Concerning
    Rajat

    Published by: Rene on July 15, 2010 09:47

    Rajat says:
    Thanks, but I don't want to store the value in a table.

    Why not? The best place for data is in a SQL table - where is can be indexed, ordered, filtered, put together and so on.

    It is also not such a thing as a «+ table PL +» This data structures is nothing like a table. It is a collection or a table - which is the correct terminology and terminology for the same data structures in languages ranging from Pascal to Java for Delphi and C/C++.

    Calling it a + "PL table +" creates the false idea that the data structure is SQL table as... which could not be further from the truth. They have almost nothing in common. There is a huge difference between a table and a collection from a table SQL.

    I want to
    table ALIGNMENT (TYPE list IS TABLE OF r_empobj ;) is assigned (type r_empobj IS RECORD (empid number, ename varchar2 (100));)

    These data resides inside the PL language like PL data structures It is not a structure of SQL data.

    The SQL language and the language PL are different languages with different runtimes. PL/SQL integrates and "connects" them--blurs the border between these two languages. But they are still clearly distinct and different languages.

    If you have three choices:

  • write a quick-sort /-bubble sort to sort the data PL. structure plastic
  • Copy the entire structure of data of PL SQL data structure, use the SQL engine for sorting and then copy the entire structure of SQL data in PL.
  • do not use a collection/table of PL structure, but use a SQL table instead.

  • How to execute a SQL statement that is stored within a SQL Table

    Hello

    If someone please help me with the following problem I would be eternally grateful

    I have a SQL statement that is stored inside a certain SQL table, I want to use this SQL statement inside my PL/SQL procedure.

    Thought a simple solution was to get the SQL statement in a table, and then run it, but how could I do so exactly with PL/SQL? I only started to play with PL/SQL in the last days.

    Thanks in advance!

    This is what it looks like more or less:

    Display result for:

    ---------------------

    SELECT TRIM (OBJ_VALU_TXT)

    OF OBJ_VALU_DOC

    WHERE TYPE_OBJET = 'FLD '.

    AND OBJECT_CODE = 15443

    AND OBJ_VALU_CD = 'CAB '.

    ORDER BYDOC_SEQ_NO

    00001

    ------------------------------------------------------------------

    SELECT

    VALUE (MAX (RECEIPT_NO) + 1,: OUT-COMP-FACTOR)

    THE FRONT DESK

    WHERE (RECEIPT_NO BETWEEN

    (: OUT-COMP-FACTOR AND: OUT TO A NUMBER) OR

    (RECEIPT_NO >: OUT-COMP-FACTOR AND)

    (: OUT-TO-NUMBER = 0)

    Here's a demo of your condition.

    create table t (col1 varchar2 (200));

    table created

    insert into values t ('select * from double ');

    1 row inserted

    declare
    v_col varchar2 (200);
    v_val varchar2 (200);
    Start

    Select col1 in t v_col;

    run immediately v_col in v_val;
    dbms_output.put_line (v_val);
    end;

    -----
    X

    Use in the clause, you can use as many variables as needed. But the basic approach remains the same.

    But storage in DB SQL is not an efficient design.

    Ishan

  • Performance issue Bulk Insert PL/SQL table type

    Hi all

    I put in work of a batch to fill a table with a large number of data records(>3,000,000). To reduce the execution time, I used PL/SQL tables to temporarily store data that must be written to the destination table. Once all documents are piling up in the PL/SQL table I use a FORALL operator for bulk insert the records in the physical table.

    Currently, I follow two approaches to implement the process described above. (Please see the code segments below). I need to choose how to best wise performance between these two approaches. I really appreciate all the comments of experts about the runtime of the two approaches.

    (I don't see much difference in consumption of time in my test environment that has limited the data series. This process involves building a complex set of structures of large product once deployed in the production environment).


    Approach I:_
    DECLARE
    TYPE of test_type IS test_tab % ROWTYPE directory INDEX TABLE;
    test_type_ test_type.
    ins_idx_ NUMBER;
    BEGIN
    ins_idx_: = 1;
    NESTED LOOPS
    test_type_ (ins_idx_) .column1: = value1;
    test_type_ (ins_idx_) .column2: = value2;
    test_type_ (ins_idx_) .column3: = value3;
    ins_idx_: = ins_idx_ + 1;
    END LOOP;

    I_ FORALL in 1.test_type_. COUNTY
    INSERT INTO test_tab VALUES (i_) test_type_;
    END;
    /


    Approach II:_
    DECLARE
    Column1 IS a TABLE OF TYPE test_tab.column1%TYPE INDEX DIRECTORY.
    Column2 IS a TABLE OF TYPE test_tab.column2%TYPE INDEX DIRECTORY.
    Column3 IS a TABLE OF TYPE test_tab.column3%TYPE INDEX DIRECTORY.
    column1 column1_;
    column2_ Column2;
    column3_ Column3;
    ins_idx_ NUMBER;
    BEGIN
    ins_idx_: = 1;
    NESTED LOOPS
    column1_ (ins_idx_): = value1;
    column2_ (ins_idx_): = value2;
    column3_ (ins_idx_): = value3;
    ins_idx_: = ins_idx_ + 1;
    END LOOP;

    FORALL idx_ in 1.column1_. COUNTY
    INSERT
    IN n_part_cost_bucket_tab)
    Column1,
    Column2,
    Column3)
    VALUES)
    column1_ (idx_),
    column2_ (idx_),
    column3_ (idx_));
    END;
    /

    Best regards
    Lorenzo

    Published by: nipuna86 on January 3, 2013 22:23

    nipuna86 wrote:

    I put in work of a batch to fill a table with a large number of data records(>3,000,000). To reduce the execution time, I used PL/SQL tables to temporarily store data that must be written to the destination table. Once all documents are piling up in the PL/SQL table I use a FORALL operator for bulk insert the records in the physical table.

    Performance is more than just reducing the execution time.

    Just as smashing a car stops more than a car in the fastest possible time.

    If it was (breaking a car stopping all simply), then a brick with reinforced concrete wall construction, would have been the perfect way to stop all types of all sorts of speed motor vehicles.

    Only problem (well more than one actually) is that stop a vehicle in this way is bad for the car, the engine, the driver, passengers and any other content inside.

    And pushing 3 million records in a PL/SQL 'table' (btw, that is a WRONG terminology - there no PL/SQL table structure) in order to run a SQL cursor INSERT 3 million times, to reduce the execution times, is no different than using a brick wall to stop a car.

    Both approaches are pretty well imperfect. Both places an unreasonable demand on the memory of the PGA. Both are still row-by-row (aka slow-by-slow) treatment.

  • Is it possible to use the record type or a PL/SQL table in the Select statement

    Hi all

    My requirement is that.
    I want to write a query and write a function, function, I want to return multiple columns at the same time in a Select statement.
    I select the return values in the Select no statement in a PL/SQL block.
    Is it possible to use the PL/SQL Table or Variable of Type record, or any other method in the statement Select?

    Please help me understand the solution.


    Kind regards

    830960 wrote:
    do we like it?

    In general, Yes, if the function is a function table, you can do something like:

    select  t.col1,
            t.col2,
            f.col1,
            f.col2,
            f.col3
      from  table_name t,
               table(some_table_function(param1,...paramN)) f
    /
    

    SY.

  • Dimension to build using the SQL table and process to populate the SQL table

    I have a dimension in a cube that is manually* built by one of our power users. Now, I have to get all the information of members of this dimension in a SQL table (example: with columns... Level0, level0property, level1, level1property etc...) to use this table in the STUDIO for the responsibility of the Member.

    Is there any easy process to do this? Currently I am building each line manually in the SQL table and there are 1100 + members in that manually built dimension. Please advice.

    Look at the outline of applied olap Extractor is a free utility

  • Variable from PL/SQL table?

    Hello

    I need to process some data in PL/SQL.
    The first thing I would do, is to write a query that collects all the mydata from different tables in exactly one table on which I can make simple queries.

    What is the preferred way to do this?
    Temporary table, or view, or something else?

    I would preffer not not to create the physical table for this. I want to use only a PL/SQL variable.

    Thank you

    user610868 wrote:
    Hello

    Thanks for your advice, but I would still do it.
    Is it possible or not? (fully searchable custom table in a PL/SQL variable)

    Yes and no.
    Yes, it is possible to get all your data and put it in a PL/SQL 'table' (better known as an array or a collection, because they are not tables)
    No, you will not be able to 'interrogate' the data in this array/collection, simply because there isn't a table, and SQL will not work against it.

    You can do all kinds of PL/SQL code to process the data in the table or the collection to simulate what would do SQL, but it will be several times slower than that of SQL, and to be honest, no expert here is likely to give you code to do because it's just the wrong way to do things.

    If you can give a legitimate situation where you needed to load the data in a table or the collection in order to treat it, then of course someone can show you how to do this, but it is likely that most of the situations describe you would be better made using SQL tables from database etc..

  • doubt in PL/SQL table

    If I said PL/SQL table and populated with 10 values.

    If I want to find a perticular values are in the list populated how can I find.say I have values from 1 to 10.
    and I want to find if 9 is in the list.
    I tried with loop. Is there another way. I use 10g.

    declare
    tr_nm number_array;
    i the number;
    Start
    I'm in 1.10
    loop
    tr_nm.extend;
    tr_nm (i): = i;
    end loop;
    for j from 1... tr_nm. Count
    loop
    If tr_nm (j) = 9 then
    i: = i + 1;
    end if;
    end loop;
    If i > 0 then
    null;
    end if;
    end;

    Please try this code
    Note: this code runs from 10 g.

    DECLARE
    type num_type is table of NUMBER;
    v_num_arr num_type;
    v_num number;
    v_var number :=9;
    BEGIN
    select level
    bulk collect into v_num_arr
    from dual connect by level <=10;
    
    dbms_output.put_line('Count - '||v_num_arr.count);
    
    if v_var member of v_num_arr then
     dbms_output.put_line('Found ');
    end if;
    
    END;
    
  • What is the best TWG or Pl/Sql Table

    Hello

    One of the best MNC asked me a question. for example,.

    What is the global temporary Table table / b/w difference Pl/Sql? What is the best to maintain the data manipulations?


    Pls advise me... !!

    for example, it is very useful.

    Adv.Thanks
    Prabhu

    As usual if you search for it you would have found your answer at this time.

    He has already been asked here before and responded. The link is

    PL/SQL table for the TWG vs

    Concerning

    REDA

  • call PL/SQL procedure from javascript

    Hello!

    How can I call PL/SQL procedure from JavaScript code?


    Thank you!

    Nihad

    Nihad,

    What APEX version do you use? Dynamic actions in 4.0 make is much easier than it was in previous versions of APEX...

    Kind regards
    Dan

Maybe you are looking for