Possible to disable cmd for some users?

Similar Questions

• Is it possible to hide a conditional function in responsibility. Say it together a small number of users, I need the function display and for some users, it must be hidden.

  Is it possible to hide a conditional function in responsibility. Say it together a small number of users, I need the function display and for some users, it must be hidden.

  Hello

  The normal thing to do is to create a similar additional responsibility and using Exclusions to 'hide' the features you want.

  Then assign it to restricted users.

  Kind regards

  Bashar

• Possible to make an element editable for some users and read-only for others

  Is it possible to make an element editable for some users and read only for others?
  
  I was able to achieve by catches of the select statement that I used to define an authorization scheme, placing in the State of read-only element. However, I would simply refer to the authorization scheme to use caching and to help keep things cleaner for future maintenance.
  
  Is it possible for a system of authorisation under a condition similar to the way point another element can be referenced by preceding with two reference points (e.g.: P1_First_Name)?

  I accomplished this in one of my applications by setting the value of a hidden Page 0 item on connect, for example P0_ACCESS_PRIVILIGES, and then use the feature 'Read only' integrated into the APEX for each article that I don't read for some users check the value of this element.

• Is it possible to set up for multiple users on the same computer to avoid entering the e-mail and the password

  Original title: Multi users

  Is it possible to set up for multiple users on the same computer to avoid entering the email and password every time that a new user want to check emails?

  Hello

  Welcome to the community forums of Microsoft and thanks for posting the question. According to the description, you need help in the creation of multiple user accounts. I've surely you will help find a solution on the issue.

  What is the operating system installed on the computer?

  User accounts, several people can easily share a single computer. Each person can have a separate user account with unique settings and preferences, such as a screen saver or desktop background. User accounts control files and programs users can access and what types of changes users can make to the computer. As a general rule, you'll want to create standard accounts for most computer users.

  If you use Windows Vista or Windows 7, see the article below:

  Create a user account

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-in/Windows7/create-a-user-account

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-in/Windows-Vista/create-a-user-account

  For Windows XP users:

  How to create and configure user accounts in Windows XP

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/279783?WA=wsignin1.0

  Hope this information helps. Answer please if you have more queries about Windows.

• RemoteScan is not for some users

  I recently installed RemoteScan on a new machine and got all this work in one programs installed on the RDS Server. In the other program requiring analysis, RemoteScan appears only for some users. I tried to recreate the user profile. I tried to copy it to the file remote.ini of a profile that works. I tried to reinstall RemoteScan on the workstation, but so far nothing has solved the problem. I have no idea what could be the cause and was hoping that someone could have encountered the same problem. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  RemoteScan files must be in the user homepath. These files should be as follows:

  TWAIN_32 (folder... RemoteScan internal folder)
  TWAIN_32.dll 44KO
  Twunk_32.exe

  All these RemoteScan files should be in the folder windows homepath from the user. To confirm the homepath from the user, you need to connect to the server as the user and then display a command prompt. Type set home.

  If you have questions contact RemoteScan to 406-721-0276.

  Thank you

• HP M477fdn printers have been impossible to install the driver for some users. We receive the error message following '0 x 00000006 '.

  have been unable to install the driver for some users. We do not receive the following error message.

  Error: 0 x 00000006

  Hi Sameer,

  Thanks for posting your query on the Microsoft Community.

  According to the description, I understand that you are getting an error code.

  I would like to know some information.

  1. You are connected to a domain network?

  2. When exactly do you get this error code?

  3. Do you also have any error message?

  This problem may occur if the print spooler service is stopped.

  To start the spooler service, follow these steps:

  1. click on Startand then click Control Panel.

  2. double-click Administrative Toolsand then click Services.

  3. double-click on the Printer Spooler service and then change the startup type to Automatic. This option sets the spooler service starts automatically when you restart the computer.

  4. If you want to start the spooler service immediately, click Start in the area of The State of the Service .

  I would also refer to the Microsoft Help Article below and check if that helps.

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/printer-problems-in-Windows-help#fix-printer-problems=Windows-7&V1H=win8tab1&V2H=win7tab1&V3H=winvistatab1

  Hope this information helps. Please let us know if you need any other help with Windows in the future. We will be happy to help you.

• VMware VIEW how to block or unallow USB for some users

  Hi guys,.

  I have a question, I can block or unallow USB for some users? not all users just someone, I have a pool with 25 machines and need block USB for 4 users, do you have any idea how to do that?

  Thanks for your help

  GPO USB - http://www.petri.co.il/disable_usb_disks_with_gpo.htm

• object is missing for some users

  Hello
  I have a custom connector and im doing request put in service, but for some users in the form of object-based is just jumping in based provisioning request. I have checked the Group and permissions, and all eyes. can pls someone tell what could be the reason?
  
  Thank you

  Hello

  I checked "Allow multiple" on the subject of resource and now the form object appears

  I don't understand this... no explanation?

• Is it possible to disable scanning for an e-magazine and just move on to other sites with

  Is it possible to disable scanning for an e-magazine and just move on to other sites with buttons?

  Read this entry form http://forums.adobe.com/message/4713104

  Basically, no, there are workaround solutions that may work for you, however.

• Questions not selectable answers in quiz slide for some users

  We have a training SCORM Captivate content published on our LMS (SAP Learning Solutions). Some users are unable to answer questions about the content. For these users, the answers are locked and can not be selected. In addition, don't seem not buttons validate and clear.

  The problem about 10% of our users.

  This training contains content and quiz slides slides.

  

  The content is published in SCORM 1.2 (SWF + HTML) with Adobe Captivate 5.5. We had the same problem for some users with the previous version of this training content with Captivate 4.

  All users have the same settings:

  Flash Player 10.3.183.11

  Internet Explorer 6

  Microsoft Windows XP

  Place a button on the first or second slide you need the user to click to go forward with the course.  I've usually place it on a slide that gives an overview of what the module will be about.  Once the user has finished with the slide, they need to click on this button to continue in the content.  The user is not aware that this button has a fixed score and the FACT that it has a score means that Captivate believes that it is part of the questionnaire, which means the scope quiz begins at this time, the first question of the quiz.

  Yes, you click the button, go to properties > reports and select the check box to include in the questionnaire.

• How to disable verification for specific user

  Hi all

  On our setting of database audit db is expanded, and verification information was resident on system tablespace.

  For some reason we allow audit to the specific user.

  VERIFICATION BY TOMMY BY ACCESS;

  CHECK DELETE THE TABLE, INSERT TABLE, SELECT THE TABLE, UPDATE TABLE BY TOMMY BY ACCESS;

  AUDIT EXECUTE ANY PROCEDURE OF TOMMY BY ACCESS;

  He wrote too much information and we want to disable this check for tommy. But we want to do without restarting database because our running System 7/24.

  We allow audit for tommy without rebooting, but we can't turn it off without restarting.

  NOAUDIT ALL BY TOMMY;

  NOAUDIT DELETE THE TABLE, INSERT TABLE, SELECT TABLE, TABLE UPDATE BY TOMMY;

  NOAUDIT PERFORM ANY PROCEDURE OF TOMMY;

  There is no error but it steel writes too much information, please help how we can disable it without reboot?

  2790572 wrote:

  Hi all

  On our setting of database audit db is expanded, and verification information was resident on system tablespace.

  For some reason we allow audit to the specific user.

  VERIFICATION BY TOMMY BY ACCESS;

  CHECK DELETE THE TABLE, INSERT TABLE, SELECT THE TABLE, UPDATE TABLE BY TOMMY BY ACCESS;

  AUDIT EXECUTE ANY PROCEDURE OF TOMMY BY ACCESS;

  He wrote too much information and we want to disable this check for tommy. But we want to do without restarting database because our running System 7/24.

  We allow audit for tommy without rebooting, but we can't turn it off without restarting.

  NOAUDIT ALL BY TOMMY;

  NOAUDIT DELETE THE TABLE, INSERT TABLE, SELECT TABLE, TABLE UPDATE BY TOMMY;

  NOAUDIT PERFORM ANY PROCEDURE OF TOMMY;

  There is no error but it steel writes too much information, please help how we can disable it without reboot?

  The change applies only to new sessions opened by TOMMY.

  So at a minimum all existing sessions belonging to TOMMY need to be terminated.

• DISABLE datepicker for some lines

  Hello
  
  I'm working on request Express 4.1.1.00.23
  
  I have a form of a table with a column that is displayed in the date picker,
  
  
  I put this code to avoid any user so far to ender for some rows based on column 3.
  
  script type = "text/javascript" >
  
  
  function lpad (pVal, pLength, pChar)
  {
  If (!) PVal)
  Return("");
  
  if(!pLength)
  Return (PVal);
  
  if(!pChar)
  Return (PVal);
  
  var pNewVal = pVal.toString ();
  while(pNewVal.Length<PLength)
  pNewVal = pChar + pNewVal;
  
  Return (pNewVal);
  }
  
  
  $(document) .ready (function () {}
  try {}
  jQuery.each ($('input[name="f03"]'), {function (index)}
  
  
  If ($(this) .val ()! = 1) {}
  
  for (x = 1; x < 3; x ++) / / f01, f02, f03, f12
  {
  $("#f" + lpad(x,2,"0") + "_" + lpad (index, 4, "0")) .css ("background-color", "Gray");
  $("#f" + lpad(x,2,"0") + "_" + lpad (index, 4, "0")) .attr ("readonly", true);
  
  
  
  }
  
  }
  
  
  });
  
  }
  {catch (Err)}
  Alert (Err);
  }
  
  });
  < /script >
  
  
  users can use the same date picker field is read-only
  How to disable the date picker?
  
  Best regards
  
  Jean-Marc
  
  Published by: jmniard on June 7, 2012 06:55

  Hi John,.

  I'm working now!

  There are two problems in your code

  One is the javascript for loop is not correct and incorrect values donations and as far as I know, you can't use here.

  A second is you should call this code after the page loads, so I wrapped it in a js function and added to the page load

  $(document).ready(function(){
    init();
  });
  

• Sync Center will fail for some users. Work for others. Is not dependent on machine. No error sync... just no sync.

  Using Windows 7 Pro on desktop computers, Windows Server 2008 on stocks. I have set up actions of the user (the same for everyone) on the server. The share of the 'always available offline' value, flash sync to logoff.

  Synchronization of some user without problem. Some never synchronize. Synchronization log indicates a successful synchronization. I even tried reallocation of a PC, that was fine synchronization for a user to another user. No synchronization to the second user.

  I tried everything I found on the forums, but nothing changes.

  I can manually run SyncToy or FreeFileSync and operation of synchronization. I tried to run these via scheduled tasks and they fail.

  Help please!

  Hi Paul,.

  Thanks for posting in the Microsoft community.

  The question you have posted is complex in this community. I suggest you post in the TechNet Forums.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/category/WindowsServer/

  I hope this helps!

• query not using the index for some user

  Hello
  
  I have a query that is running in less than a second for sys, system, or schema owner. However, another user (test_user) take 30 seconds to run the same query.
  
  I certainly dba and privileges identical to test_user as schmea_user, but the result is the same.
  
  I checked
  
  Select * from V$ SYS_OPTIMIZER_ENV;
  
  Both are the same for both users.
  
  I have check the plan to explain to both users. I noticed that for sys/system/schema_owner, the query uses an index, but not the test_user.
  
  All have experience the issue where a user uses an index, but not the other?
  
  Thank you for any assistance.

  Thank you for the display of formatting output, this output is much easier to read.

  One of the first things you notice about the execution plans that is for the owner non-schema "SQL_ID, 0wcs85uywn72m, number of children 1" appears in the output of DBMS_XPLAN, while "SQL_ID 0wcs85uywn72m, child number 0" (the same SQL_ID but a different number of child) appears for the schema owner. "" Whereas the SQL_ID is the same, which indicates that the client requires exactly the same SQL statement, so it's a good start.

  Then, note that in the predicate for the nonschema owner information section the following appears (sometimes with the order of the two conditions switched in position) as a condition placed on each table that is available in the schema:

  filter(("SEAL_FLAG" IS NULL OR "SEAL_FLAG"'Y'))
  

  The above suggests the presence of the virtual private database (or a superset of private database virtual) generated the predicates. You should be able to confirm that this is the case by querying V$ VPD_POLICY using the SQL_ID which was displayed in the DBMS_XPLAN output:

  SELECT
    *
  FROM
    V$VPD_POLICY
  WHERE
    SQL_ID='0wcs85uywn72m';
  

  As a test, I made a few minor adjustments to the example on this page:
  http://Antognini.ch/2011/09/optimizer_secure_view_merging-and-VPD/
  I changed the name of T to T12 and TESTUSER table specified for the schema names. I then created the function S of this page as follows:

  CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION s (schema IN VARCHAR2, tab IN VARCHAR2) RETURN VARCHAR2 AS
  BEGIN
    RETURN 'ID < 10';
  END;
  /
  

  I then added a couple of lines in the T12 test table:

  INSERT INTO T12 VALUES (1,1,NULL);
  INSERT INTO T12 VALUES (4,1,NULL);
  INSERT INTO T12 VALUES (10,1,NULL);
  INSERT INTO T12 VALUES (12,1,NULL);
  
  COMMIT;
  

  With an active 10053 trace, I executed the following SQL statement:

  SELECT id, pad
    FROM t12
    WHERE
    spy(id, pad) = 1
  

  The SQL_ID (in my case, found in the 10053 trace file) was 6hqw5p9d8g8wf, so I checked V$ VPD_POLICY to this SQL_ID:

  SELECT
    *
  FROM
    V$VPD_POLICY
  WHERE
    SQL_ID='6hqw5p9d8g8wf';
  
  ADDRESS          PARADDR            SQL_HASH SQL_ID        CHILD_NUMBER OBJECT_OWNER OBJECT_NAME                    POLICY_GROUP                   POLICY                 POLICY_FUNCTION_OWNER          PREDICATE
  ---------------- ---------------- ---------- ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ---------------------- ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  000007FFB7701608 000007FFB7743350 1518838670 6hqw5p9d8g8wf            0 TESTUSER     T12                            SYS_DEFAULT                    T_SEC                  TESTUSER                       ID < 10
  

  As noted above, the VPD test function named S added the predicate "ID".< 10"="" to="" the="" sql="">

  There are not many clues in the 10053 trace file in my test VPD generated additional predicates. Trace the following was found shortly after the beginning of the file (this is the SQL statement initially presented):

  ----- Current SQL Statement for this session (sql_id=6hqw5p9d8g8wf) -----
  SELECT id, pad
    FROM t12
    WHERE
    spy(id, pad) = 1
  

  I searched then down in the trace for final after changes query file (to be noted that this sentence could be slightly different in different versions of database Oracle). That's what I found:

  Final query after transformations: ******* UNPARSED QUERY IS *******
  SELECT "T12"."ID" "ID","T12"."PAD" "PAD" FROM "TESTUSER"."T12" "T12" WHERE "TESTUSER"."SPY"("T12"."ID","T12"."PAD")=1 AND "T12"."ID"<10
  kkoqbc: optimizing query block SEL$F5BB74E1 (#0)
  

  Note that the final query after transformation shows how the final version of the query that has been rewritten by the query optimizer before the SQL statement has been executed and this version of the query includes AND "T12". "" IDENTITY CARD ".<10. if="" i="" was="" attempting="" to="" determine="" how="" that=""><10 predicate="" was="" added="" to="" the="" sql="" statement,="" i="" would="" start="" at="" the="" "current="" sql="" statement="" for"="" line="" in="" the="" trace="" file="" and="" search="" down="" the="" trace="" file="" for=""><10* -="" in="" this="" case,="" the="" following="" is="" what="" i="" found="" as="" the="" first="" search="" result,="" very="" close="" to="" the="" "current="" sql="" statement="" for"="" line="" in="" the="" trace="">

  **************************
  Predicate Move-Around (PM)
  **************************
  PM:     PM bypassed: Outer query contains no views.
  PM:     PM bypassed: Outer query contains no views.
  query block SEL$F5BB74E1 (#0) unchanged
  FPD: Considering simple filter push in query block SEL$F5BB74E1 (#0)
  "TESTUSER"."SPY"("T12"."ID","T12"."PAD")=1 AND "T12"."ID"<10
  try to generate transitive predicate from check constraints for query block SEL$F5BB74E1 (#0)
  finally: "TESTUSER"."SPY"("T12"."ID","T12"."PAD")=1 AND "T12"."ID"<10
  

  As can be seen from the above (because the predicate again appeared before and after the line containing the word "Finally: '), the AND"T12 ". "" IDENTITY CARD ".<10 predicate="" was="" already="" added="" to="" the="" original="" sql="" statement="" by="" the="" time="" the="" predicate="" move-around="" section="" of="" the="" trace="" file="" was="" written,="" and="" that="" is="" the="" first="" mention="" of=""><10 in="" the="" trace="" file.="" in="" your="" case,="" you="" would="" search="" the="" 10053="" trace="" file="">

  "SEAL_FLAG" IS NULL
  

  If V$ VPD_POLICY revealed that there are virtual private database (VPD) generated predicates applied to the SQL statement, take a look at the following article in the Oracle documentation library:
  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/B28359_01/network.111/B28531/VPD.htm

  This article lists the different points of view, who can be interviewed to learn more about the VPD rules which are in force in the schema. For example, with my SPV test:

  SELECT
    *
  FROM
    ALL_POLICIES;
  
  OBJECT_OWNER                   OBJECT_NAME                    POLICY_GROUP                  POLICY_NAME                    PF_OWNER                       PACKAGE                       FUNCTION                       SEL INS UPD DEL IDX CHK ENA STA POLICY_TYPE              LON
  ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ----------------------------- ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ----------------------------- ------------------------------ --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ------------------------ ---
  TESTUSER                       T12                            SYS_DEFAULT                   T_SEC                          TESTUSER                       S                                                            YES YES YES YES NO  NO  YES NO  DYNAMIC                  NO
  

  He knows performance issues related to the use of VPD, some of which are Oracle Database version-dependent, and some have been fixed in recent versions. Take a look at the following articles if you have access to My Oracle Support:
  MetaLink (MOS) Doc ID 728292.1 ' known performance problems when you use transparent encryption data and indexes on the encrypted columns.
  MetaLink (MOS) Doc ID 967042.1 "How to investigate Query Performance regressions Caused by VPD (FGAC) predicates?"

  You might find working through the second of the above that the problem is caused by a bug in database Oracle.

  On a side note. Execution plans you have published include the 0 value in the column starts many of the operations in the execution plan. 0 indicates that the operation never actually executed. A 0 is included in the column starts on the line that includes the FULL ACCESS of TABLE of PEOPLE_TRANSACTIONS at least to the OPC. Value 123, a full table of PEOPLE_TRANSACTIONS table scan PROPERTY_CONTAINER_ID was not actually performed.

  Charles Hooper
  http://hoopercharles.WordPress.com/
  IT Manager/Oracle DBA
  K & M-making Machine, Inc.

• Stop the weekly reports for some users

  We have a few clients asking not to receive weekly reports of the site which are emailed to.

  How decide you who did and didn't receive these reports?

  Thank you

  Hi Paul,.

  All users can disable weekly reports under my details. For all users, they are enabled by default.

  See you soon,.

  -mario