Pregunta simple rules

Similar Questions

• Firefox does not take into account CSS rules that I put

  So, if you look at my site:

  http://leaveyourdailyhell.com

  In, say, Chrome and Firefox, you will see very different things. In Chrome, it seems I had intended; namely, the messages loop custom WordPress on the first page and the top of each "message" has correctly sized thumbnails, floated to the left. In other words, it obeys the CSS rules that I set. (And copy CSS I have, for the record, W3C validated - it came back perfect.)

  In Firefox, however, both of these div tags ignore CSS rules, I put. No floats; the images are their original sizes and, on the same page, where the band positions is supposed to have a custom background, it is not found. It is not even obey simple rules, such as the assignment of a custom color for the links. When I right click to inspect the elements, the CSS rules are not found!

  (And copy CSS I have, for the record, W3C validated - it came back perfect.)

  The validator displays 30 markup errors, 50 CSS3 CSS3 231 warnings and errors. The experimental unified validator returns 1763 CSS3 warnings.

  • http://validator.w3.org/ - markup validator.
  • http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ - CSS validator.
  • http://validator.w3.org/unicorn/ - experimental unified validator.

• vFoglight alert rule do not behave properly

  Hello

  I would like to create what I would think that should be a relatively simple rule, here are the details, if anyone can help that would be great.

  1. The rule must include only the virtual machines VMware than that name meet a specific criterion, i.e. 'maintenance -' (see screenshot 'definition of the rule')
  2. The rule should warn if the CPU reaches of varying levels, either warning 60, 70 for criticism etc. (see the attached screenshot "rule conditions").

  Here is what I expected to happen...

  The first must restrict the scope of the rule only the virtual machines that meet this criterion. If I check the box 'validate the scope of the rule' green in this section, it shows me a list of these virtual machines with this name. Large.

  The second point should then take these extended virtual machines and watch the CPU usage and compare that to the threshold defined in the registry variable.

  Regarding the screenshot 3 (alerts rule) - the first problem is that I get alerts for virtually all of the virtual machines, so it is ignoring the scope.

  The second issue is that it does not notice the severity level, so it's just alert for regardless of whether it reaches the threshold. All strangely I actually disabled the alarm 'WARNING' so it should be for this type of event be alert.

  Any advice would be very welcome. Or is there a better way to do what im aiming to do that would be fantastic.

  Thank you

  Additional accessories:

  • Rule Conditions.PNG
  • definition of the rule. PNG

  If you reboot the host and disable the alarms should fire on the virtual machines in the scope.  There is a bug that basically the rule sticks in memory and is not updated correctly.  Last I looked there is a fix on that provided for 6.6.2 (Core 5.6.4)

• HTTPS ASA AAA authentication rules prompt

  I'm trying to configure a simple rule of AAA in my lab to allow access to the internet web server via authentication GANYMEDE + (see attached configuration).

  This Setup seems to work fine when the authentication prompt is displayed using http, while the https login page seems to have some problems with a certificate error recognized from the browser with the message: SSL_ERROR_BAD_MAC_READ

  It seems that https login page redirection is not allowed due to server address certificate incompatibility.

  Advice and suggestions will be greatly appreciated.

  Seems to be a known issue.

  https://BST.cloudapps.Cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCus27650/?reffering_site...

  Kind regards

  Jousset

  ~ Make rate of useful messages.

• How to find spaces in a file extracted in order to trigger a rule MOVE_IT

  In the studio I'm setting a field of variable on a section and I want to learn from my file extracted using a simple rule of MOVE_IT.

  I'm going to pull information from a record that has spaces columns 10-14.  How to enter the required information in the DATA field to make the request?

  For example, if I pulled the information from a record who had 'XXXXX' in column 10-14, I know that the DATA field would be 10, XXXXX

  I can't figure out how to find space at a given offset.

  Thank you.

  As you know, normally spaces are considered as a delimiter in the search string and therefore would be ignored. Doing a search for "1, ABC, 10, ' would have been a mistake that it would look like had not provided you the final search key. However, there may be a way that you can accomplish this research by using the feature 'or' without a 'or '.

  If a search key begins with open paren, it is assumed that you will provide several possible matches. For example, you could do something like this: 1, ABC, 10,(XXX,YYYY,ZZ). That said, find the line of the snippet that starts with ABC in the first column and then a XXX or AAAA or ZZ from 10th column.

  This method 'or' uses commas to separate possible matches and not break on the spaces as a normal search mask. Therefore, you can actually do: 1, ABC, 10, (de) - where I have 5 spaces between the opening and closing paren. Note that I did not put in a comma because I only had one criteria. The system doesn't care what and will simply accept what is between the parens and pick him up.

• Annex rule Email led Action

  Hello

  I have a requirement of evaluation of a rule of planning focused on 3 times during the day, 13:00, 13:30 and 13:45 and email alerts in each of these moments as long as the condition is true.

  I have setup a program that acts as a trigger for my rule of multiple gravity at the fire in these moments there. "Activate the trigger without data has also been selected.

  The alert level has been activated in this rule and configured with an e-mail action.

  Due to the nature of several rules of gravity - once the warning level is raised (and e-mail is generated), no more emails are generated in the rest of the two periods.

  How can I provoke action of the alarm (action Email) to be pulled on a rule of conduct annex, even if the State of the object of assosciated with this rule is currently the State of gravity alarm even to serve as a reminder? Is it possible to do without making use of level critical and Fatal?  Perhaps by making use of the tab behavior or would it just be better to use a Simple rule?

  Thanks again in advance

  As you noted, several laws of gravity are State-based. This means that the rule actions are triggered only when the state changes. According to your description, the best approach to repeatedly trigger actions for the same condition is to use a Simple rule.

  Kind regards

  Brian Wheeldon

• Addition of vShield Edge NAT rules from a CSV using PowerCLI

  I recently read Alan great post on adding NAT here rules: http://www.virtu-al.net/2014/07/24/working-vcd-edge-gateway-rules-powercli/

  I used it successfully for simple rules in a lab environment, but hundreds of rules I need to do in Production.

  Although I managed to hack together an Excel spreadsheet that concatenated all these parameters to create each order, I was wondering if there was a faster way to do it.

  My plan was to modify the script to Alan to import a CSV file, and then loop through each line and generate the XML file in a single pass.

  However, I am very rusty on my scripting skills, so I thought I would first ask if this has already been done by someone else.

  Anyone know if there is a way to update the rules of NAT edge vShield from a CSV file?

  Adam,

  I was an associate of the original request for this feature. Alan made us most of the way with a function to create a single rule, but as in your use case, we also had a lot of rules to build everything at once.

  Our solution was rather minor tweaks and the creation of 3 functions rather than 2.

  * Feature: New DNATRuleXML and new SNATRuleXML.  We have created these two functions to build the string XML (one for the SNAT) and one for the DNAT, their results are stored in a global variable.

  * Function: New-NATXMLExecute. It is a function execute to execute the creation of the great XML string created in the above functions.

  You should change/use power rule XML functions to interface with one worksheet, and then you should be far away. It will be useful.

  Example of code is below:

  ===============================================

  Function (new-NATXMLExecute

  $EdgeGateway,

  $NATXML,

  $FirewallEnable) {}

  Write-Host "' no nExecuting add it NAT function"-ForegroundColor Cyan

  Write-Host "-----------------------------------------------------"

  Write-Host "EdgeGateway: 't' t$ EdgeGateway '.

  #Write - Host "' tNATXML: 't' t$ NATXML '.

  Write-Host "activate the firewall?: 't' t$ FirewallEnable '.

  Write-Host "-----------------------------------------------------"

  $Edgeview = search clouds QueryType - EdgeGateway-name $EdgeGateway | Get-CIView

  If (! $Edgeview) {}

  Write-Warning 'edge Gateway with $Edgeview name not found. "

  Output

  }

  $URI = ($edgeview. Href + ' / action/configureServices ")

  $wc = new-Object System.Net.WebClient

  # Add Authorization headers

  $wc. Headers.Add ("x-vcloud-authorization", $Edgeview.Client.SessionKey)

  $wc. Headers.Add ("Content-Type", "application/vnd.vmware.admin.edgeGatewayServiceConfiguration+xml")

  $wc. Headers.Add ("Accept", "application / * + xml;") version = 5.1 ")

  $webclient = New-Object system.net.webclient

  $webclient. Headers.Add("x-vcloud-authorization",$Edgeview.Client.SessionKey)

  $webclient. Headers.Add ("accept", $EdgeView.Type + ";") version = 5.1 ")

  [xml] $EGWConfXML is $webclient. DownloadString($EdgeView.href)

  [xml] $OriginalXML = $EGWConfXML.EdgeGateway.Configuration.EdgegatewayServiceConfiguration.NatService.outerxml

  #Check if the firewall is turned on

  $FirewallStatus = $EGWConfXML.EdgeGateway.Configuration.EdgegatewayServiceConfiguration.FirewallService.IsEnabled

  Write-Host "active current firewall status: $FirewallStatus.» "This will be changed to: $FirewallEnable.

  LogWrite "active current firewall status: $FirewallStatus.» "This will be changed to: $FirewallEnable.

  If (($NATXML) - or ($FirewallStatus - not $FirewallEnable)) {}

  $GoXML = '

  http://www.VMware.com/vCloud/v1.5">

  "' + $FirewallEnable +"

  drop

  fake

  true'

  $OriginalXML.NatService.NatRule | {Foreach}

  $GoXML += $_. OuterXML

  }

  $GoXML += $NATXML

  $GoXML += '

  '

  $script: NATXMLExecute = $GoXML

  [byte []] $byteArray = [System.Text.Encoding]: ASCII. GetBytes ($GoXML)

  $UploadData = $wc. UploadData ("POST", $URI, $bytearray)

  $EdGWStatus = EdgeGatewayStatus - EdgeGateway $EdgeGateway

  Write-Host - NoNewline "Waiting for EdgeGateway configure...". »

  LogWrite "Waiting for EdgeGateway configure...". »

  While ($EdGWStatus - no "ready")

  {

  Start-Sleep - seconds 3

  Write-Host - NoNewline ". »

  $EdGWStatus = EdgeGatewayStatus - EdgeGateway $EdgeGateway

  If ($EdGWStatus - eq "Error") {}

  Write-Host "Error Has occurred...". Check the EdgeGateway"- ForegroundColor Red

  LogWrite "Error Has occurred...". Check the EdgeGateway.

  breaking

  }

  }

  Write-Host - NoNewline ".» EdgeGateway Ready.

  Write-Host "' nNAT complete building.»  ForegroundColor - Green

  LogWrite "NAT complete building."

  }

  else {}

  Write-Host "no change necessary." No changes have been made to the EdgeGateway"- ForegroundColor yellow

  LogWrite "no modification required...". No change was made.

  }

  }

  Function (new-DNATRuleXML

  $EdgeGateway,

  $ExternalNetwork,

  $OriginalIP,

  $OriginalPort,

  $TranslatedIP,

  $TranslatedPort,

  $Protocol) {}

  Write-Host "Building DNAT rule XML" - ForegroundColor yellow

  Write-Host "' tEdgeGateway: 't' t$ EdgeGateway '.

  Write-Host "' tExternalNetwork: ' t$ ExternalNetwork '.

  Write-Host "' tOriginal IP: 't' t$ OriginalIP '.

  Write-Host "' tOriginalPort: 't' t$ OriginalPort '.

  Write-Host "' tTranslatedIP: 't' t$ TranslatedIP '.

  Write-Host "' tTranslatedPort: 't' t$ TranslatedPort '.

  Write-Host "' tProtocol: 't' t$ Protocol.

  $Edgeview = search clouds QueryType - EdgeGateway-name $EdgeGateway | Get-CIView

  If (! $Edgeview) {}

  Write-Warning 'edge Gateway with $Edgeview name not found. "

  Output

  }

  $URI = ($edgeview. Href + ' / action/configureServices ")

  $wc = new-Object System.Net.WebClient

  # Add Authorization headers

  $wc. Headers.Add ("x-vcloud-authorization", $Edgeview.Client.SessionKey)

  $wc. Headers.Add ("Content-Type", "application/vnd.vmware.admin.edgeGatewayServiceConfiguration+xml")

  $wc. Headers.Add ("Accept", "application / * + xml;") version = 5.1 ")

  $webclient = New-Object system.net.webclient

  $webclient. Headers.Add("x-vcloud-authorization",$Edgeview.Client.SessionKey)

  $webclient. Headers.Add ("accept", $EdgeView.Type + ";") version = 5.1 ")

  [xml] $EGWConfXML is $webclient. DownloadString($EdgeView.href)

  [xml] $OriginalXML = $EGWConfXML.EdgeGateway.Configuration.EdgegatewayServiceConfiguration.NatService.outerxml

  If {($Script:NewID)}

  $Script: NewID += 1

  $NewID = $Script: NewID

  }

  else {}

  $NewID = [int]($OriginalXML.NatService.natrule |) Sort identifier. (Select the Id - Last 1) user.user + 1

  If {($NewID-éq. 1)}

  #If NoID was found, set the correct ID of departure

  $NewID = 65537

  }

  $Script: NewID = $NewID

  }

  $strXML = '

  DNAT

  true

  ' + $NewID + '

  "' + $OriginalIP +"

  "' + $OriginalPort +"

  "' + $TranslatedIP +"

  "' + $TranslatedPort +"

  ' + $Protocol + '

  '

  $script: DNATXML = $StrXML

  }

  Function (new-SNATRuleXML

  $EdgeGateway,

  $ExternalNetwork,

  $OriginalIP,

  $TranslatedIP

  ) {

  Write-Host "Building SNAT rule XML" - ForegroundColor yellow

  Write-Host "' tEdgeGateway: 't' t$ EdgeGateway '.

  Write-Host "' tExternalNetwork: ' t$ ExternalNetwork '.

  Write-Host "' tOriginal IP: 't' t$ OriginalIP '.

  Write-Host "' tTranslatedIP: 't' t$ TranslatedIP '.

  $Edgeview = search clouds QueryType - EdgeGateway-name $EdgeGateway | Get-CIView

  If (! $Edgeview) {}

  Write-Warning 'edge Gateway with $Edgeview name not found. "

  Output

  }

  $URI = ($edgeview. Href + ' / action/configureServices ")

  $wc = new-Object System.Net.WebClient

  # Add Authorization headers

  $wc. Headers.Add ("x-vcloud-authorization", $Edgeview.Client.SessionKey)

  $wc. Headers.Add ("Content-Type", "application/vnd.vmware.admin.edgeGatewayServiceConfiguration+xml")

  $wc. Headers.Add ("Accept", "application / * + xml;") version = 5.1 ")

  $webclient = New-Object system.net.webclient

  $webclient. Headers.Add("x-vcloud-authorization",$Edgeview.Client.SessionKey)

  $webclient. Headers.Add ("accept", $EdgeView.Type + ";") version = 5.1 ")

  [xml] $EGWConfXML is $webclient. DownloadString($EdgeView.href)

  [xml] $OriginalXML = $EGWConfXML.EdgeGateway.Configuration.EdgegatewayServiceConfiguration.NatService.outerxml

  If {($Script:NewID)}

  $Script: NewID += 1

  $NewID = $Script: NewID

  }

  else {}

  $NewID = [int]($OriginalXML.NatService.natrule |) Sort identifier. (Select the Id - Last 1) user.user + 1

  If {($NewID-éq. 1)}

  #If NoID was found, set the correct ID of departure

  $NewID = 65537

  }

  $Script: NewID = $NewID

  }

  $strXML = '

  SNAT

  true

  ' + $NewID + '

  "' + $OriginalIP +"

  "' + $TranslatedIP +"

  '

  $script: SNATXML = $StrXML

  }

  ===============================================

• 'Invalid destination specified for this function' (HFM rules)

  Hello

  I'm stuck with an expression of the simple rule, and I get the following error:

  Invalid destination specified for this function: a #A39725. E #E051_OVAxxx.I #[ICP None]. C1 #S101_000.C2 #L980. C3 #GuarReclassNCI.C4 #EndBal.V # < entity motto >. W #YTD.

  Here's the complete rule:

  If povScenario = 'Act' and povYear > 2011 Then

  vBS_Guar_Tar = '. '. I have #[ICP no]. C1 #S101_000.C2 #L980. C3 #GuarReclassNCI.C4 #EndBal.V # < entity motto >. W #YTD ".

  vBS_Guar_Src = '. '. I have #[high PEAK]. C1 #TotalC1.C2 #TotalC2.C3 #UsGAAP_Alloc.C4 #TotalC4.V # < entity Curr Total >. W #YTD ".

  'Guarantor check - Reclass NCI

  Hs.Exp ' a #A39725.» E #E051_OVAxxx"& vBS_Guar_Tar &" = a #A39725.» E #OVA *-1 '& vBS_Guar_Src '.

  Hs.Exp 'a #ME. E #E051_OVAxxx"& vBS_Guar_Tar &" = a #A39725.» E #OVA *-1 '& vBS_Guar_Src '.

  End If ' if povScenario = 'Act' and povYear > 2011 Then

  Clues as to why it does not work?

  Thank you!

  Entity (with dimensions scenario, year, length and value) may not be specified on the left side of a HS. Equation of the exp.  These dimensions are considered in the calculation/consolidation "block" and are determined by the current point of view.

  If you want this logic runs only on specific entities, and you have more than one, I suggest to use a UDA on the entity.  Then you can do something like (written in pseudocode):

  If the entity currenty uda is RECLASSNCI then

• Period closing ball account includes combination of movements, even with a ruler. WHY?

  Hello chaps, I've been struggling with this for a few days now and I don't want to admit defeat. :(
  
  I'm trying to do two things.
  1. balance sheet view periodical movements
  2. get the correct custom closing balance to roll up once I did 1 (in the periodic display)
  
  What I've done.
  For Point 1. I use the SwitchTypeForFlow attribute on the flow members. This let's me see periodic according to balance sheet movements. Large.
  
  Which brings me on Point 2. While I can now see the movements of regular assessment according to, the closing balance (the parent opening + increases - decreases) is not total correctly. Instead of add opening + increases - decreases for a given period, he adds for ALL previous periods.
  
  OK, so to get round that, I thought I would just create a new Member, called "ClosingBal" and substitute that HFM. I now have two rules. The "OpeningBal" is just the ending balance of the last period. "ClosingBal" is simply the sum of the opening + increases - decreases for the period. This is so the two simple rules
  HS. Exp ' #OpeningBal C1 = C1 #ClosingBal.P #Prior.
  HS. Exp ' #ClosingBal C1 = C1 #OpeningBal + #increases - C1 #decreases C1.
  
  But when I do this, even with the rule, he ALWAYS adds the cumulative increases and decreases for all previous periods as well, not only those of the period. Why it does this? All I want is my opening balance to this one time equal to opening balance + increases - decreases. It works very well in sight for a YEAR, but the view not periodical. I need to work in regular mode
  
  any help much appreciated.
  Thank you
  SAL

  SAL,
  There is no solution here which allows the user to simply change the view of periodical to CDA Member, while keeping the same and get the desired results. However, you can create a solution when a user wants to issues of journals it would choose the Member of periodic view and then select a single member of the ClosingBal (eg. "ClosingBalPer") and a member of single OpenBal (for example. "OpenBalPeriodic"). When the user wants to CDA numbers it would choose member view for a YEAR and then select a member of ClosingBal as unique and different (eg. "ClosingBalYTD") and an OpenBal member as unique and different (eg. "OpenBalYTD").

  Here you have 2 different rules for you opening balances:
  HS. Exp ' #OpeningBalPer C1 = C1 #ClosingBal.P #Prior.
  HS. Exp ' #OpeningBalYTD C1 = C1 #ClosingBal.P #Last.Y #Prior.

  And your rules ClosingBal would look like this:
  HS. Exp ' #ClosingBalPer C1 = C1 #OpeningBalPer + #increases - C1 #decreases C1.
  HS. Exp ' #ClosingBalYTD C1 = C1 #OpeningBalYTD + #increases - C1 #decreases C1.

  Regarding the rules of ClosingBal, that are not necessary if you perform the Member ClosingBal a parent of the other members. If 'reduces' need to be subtracted then they should be reported as "SwithSignForFlow".

  Thanks to this solution if a user has selected for a YEAR with periodic or regular members with the members of the CDA then their number would not make sense then there would be some education user with this solution.

• How to record a set of rules to easily make a number of changes both in Adobe Acrobat 9?

  So right now I import a huge old trail of paper in PDF format via the scan. Once these files are analyzed, is it possible that I can implement a simple rule or save a set of process in order to:
  (A) adds a watermark indicating "DÉPÔT" and the date.

  (B) the document OCR

  (C) delete the pages scanned white (I understand that the blank page is an image of a blank page stored in the field).

  A solution with a single click would be optimal. I understand that it is never easy, but if you guys know a way to simplify, rather than go through the process on all the files (there are thousands of separate folders / days) I would appreciate the help.

  You can use a batch process to make the first two things. Remove white pages is not possible in general, especially for the scanned pages since they will never be devoid of content. It would be possible to use JavaScript to see what pages do not have any text on them after OCR and then delete these pages, but it is not clear to me if that would be enough.

• Word format / style rules to improve the conversion of PDF forms

  I remember seeing in a help file guides for people who use Office to adhear to a few simple rules to help when converting to a PDF form.

  We have many check list in different bets on the page and by different people with often little or no training or understanding.  (Notepad is complicated for their understanding - but I digress).

  Thus, we have checklists / Questions etc. in Word tables or in a document, etc.

  There are no guides I can find it recommends no spicific formatting to improve the conversion of Word to PDF format.

  For example.

  Name: OR name: _______ OR name.    Name the name in a field and the next field empty or _ _ or (_ = Undersore)

  So inconsistent as to what is a field and what is NOT...

  Then, it is the common problem of the users using "Insert symbol" like a box (how I hate forms of words that are filled with this Jem)

  Is there a formatting guide 101, which could help to provide assistance to those who are often responsible for "make a form / check list" so that when these documents are then required to be converted into a form PDF; do not start from scratch.

  There must be a document that identified what looks like the PDF Converter in deciding whether or NOT it is a domain!

  OH...  And is there a setting that will allow these symbols of checkbox dredded be recognized as a checkbox form?

  Thanks in advance.

  Mark

  First of all, when you set up the form in WORD, make sure that the Adobe PDF printer is selected in the menu of the printer so that the provision complies when converting to PDF. That has long been a problem with WORD documents/forms that reflow based on the connected printer.

  Acrobat Search essentially everything that seems to be a standard form element (a line of underscores, box or circle) and create a field related to these items. If you leave space, easy to use form tools in Acrobat to create your own fields (or modify those that Acrobat has attempted to add). The key is therefore what would be a normal type of the input in a form field. I'm not sure that the spaces after the colon are recognized as such. I suggest you create a simple shape style in WORD and add a variety of aspects of different shape type to the document and try the conversion. The manual says really nothing more that I mentioned. There are a few tutorials on the creation of the form at Adobe.

  You might find these useful tutorials: http://acrobatusers.com/tutorials/filter/search&keywords=wizard&channel=tutorials&category = 8 & 86 & tut_type = video-OnDemand-graphics-HTML /. I didn't help much in the present, but they can be useful for you.

• The Siebel data model with attribute mapping rule OPA?

  Hello
  
  Someone at - it has mapped siebel attribute of data model with the attribute rulefiles (rule of word doc file) (for example, p1, p2, p3... generated automatically)?
  
  I imported the siebel data model in OPM version 10.2. He created siebeldatmodel.xsrc file. all siebel attribute created with ID, model ID with the same name as the name attribute of siebel. but in the rulebook, we attributte with p1, p2, p3... names etc.
  
  The problem I am facing at I'm not able to map the attribute siebel generated with attribute (p1, p2, p3) rule book
  
  Any quick suggestions of experts will be very apperciable.
  
  
  Thank you

  There are a few simple rules for text attributes.

  1. unless the attribute belongs to the global level, the attribute must have the text of the entity included in its text. Thus, if the attribute belongs to the 'contact' it must understand that in its text. The possible options are:

  "* the contact work country."

  "the country of work of * the * contact."

  2. you cannot have two attributes with the same public name or the same text. So, you will get an error if you have two attributes with the same text "the country of work.

  Published by: frank.hampshire on July 27, 2011 13:50

  Published by: frank.hampshire on July 27, 2011 13:50

• Application of the rules to Instances of entity in a sequence (multiple calls necessary?)

  Hello
  
  In my OPA team, we have a situation in which it would be useful to be able to run a series of calculations on a set of instances sequentially. We wonder if there is an acceptable method for this in a single call to a modules, because the OPA does not allow a loop or a sequential processing of data in a way that seems obvious.
  
  Context:
  Consider a situation involving a computation that can be performed on a single Bill, but we have a series of bills to deal with. For example, let's say that there are a certain amount of a deduction or "co-payments" that must be subtracted from the large bills, but is deducted in greater quantity of invoices received earlier (rather than be distributed also among them) and then will deplete fairly once was subtracted in all. In this case, it is not sufficient to use a statement of the type «for each of the Bills...» "because the conditions for the calculation have to change with each invoice. This seems to require the ability to browse an ordered list, but we do not know if something like this is possible (without violating an axiom or advised).
  
  Ideas:
  The best idea we could come to would be to use a time stamp to identify the Bill earlier as a starting point and then use the function of 'unknown' to force the rules to calculate the deduction for 'other' more former Bill in sequence. The current solution will be to call several times modules by an external script that loops through the Bills.
  
  To sum up, we wonder whether there is an acceptable approach to apply a set of rules to an entity instance before to apply the same rules to others, without requiring multiple calls for modules.
  
  Thank you!
  -Patrick
  
  Published by: Patrick guess on July 6, 2011 19:11

  You started down the right path. To quickly answer questions, there is no need for multiple calls to the basis of rules, no for ranking explicit rules or data.

  The challenge when using unordered rules / systems of determinations is out procedural thinking (that loops or sequencing data explicit is required). The solution is by expressing the declarative logic equivalent (which requires no sequence with the right answer). In this case, consider the calculation from the perspective of one invoice at a time and write the rules that express properly how much to pay, what is the quota, etc. For the batch processing where running tallies are needed, there is something practical for use in the rule based systems - conclude the subtotal per each item being counted (for example, remaining annual quota through each invoice). This approach allows the declarative rules which "defined" the method calculate the score by a Bill, so that the following invoices can use the score of previous bills. Unfortunately, the description abstract approach always sounds more confused, so here is an example of rule of pseudocode that can communicate the key elements of the approach...

  Assume:
  Bills have numbers (or dates/hours) which can be used to conclude an absolute order for all bills (we will use Bill in ordering them in this example)
  Remaining annual quota of the person is the initial amount of copay remaining before the current batch of invoices is treated
  Each invoice must include a co-payment of $50 (for simplicity, although this could be concluded by rules and vary based on the services provided, etc.)
  Assume all bills are more than the share (again to simplify this example, this could be dealt with in the rules of both conditions)
  The main objectives of the basis of rules are to determine the share of each invoice and the balance sheet of the share of the person (i.e. copay they may still have to pay this year) after treats a batch of invoices.

  Pseudo rules to get the general concept:

  Set the order in which the bills need to be addressed...
  -The Bill (prior Bill) is a member of previous invoices of the invoice if the s prior invoice ID< the="" invoice's="">
  -The Bill (later Bill) is a member of the subsequent invoices of the invoice if the invoice later s ID > ID of the invoice
  -The Bill (Bill immediately preceding) is a member of if immediately before invoice
  the immediately previous invoice is a member, if the prior Bill of Bill AND
  the number of previous invoices of the invoice with ID > ID of the invoice immediately before = 0

  To conclude the first remaining share of each invoice... put them in a table of rules, so they can conclude the same attribute but use different logical formulas
  -Initial remaining Copay of the invoice = remaining share of the person if the number of the invoice is immediately previous bills is 0 (i.e. the first Bill in the batch)
  -Initial remaining Copay of the invoice = share of remaining final invoice of the immediately previous invoice (i.e. each ' initial rest copay "is the same that the invoice immediately before the 'final remaining copay)

  A table is used to define how much share for each invoice - two possible scenarios...
  -Share of the invoice = $50 if the original invoice remaining share > = $50
  -Share of the Bill remaining share = original invoice if the original invoice remaining quota<>

  A rule to determine the final remaining share of each invoice (i.e. after subtracting the share upward through this invoice of the annual overall amount of the person)
  -Copay remaining final invoice = remaining share original of the invoice - share of the Bill

  A rule to determine the person remains final share (i.e. After all invoices in this batch have been processed)
  -remaining share final person = final remaining share of the Bill if later the invoice s County bills = 0 (i.e. the final copay remaining of the 'last' Bill in the batch)

  Note that some attributes and relationships above are not absolutely necessary (i.e., it is not necessary to postpone the two remaining original co-pay and determine a final remaining share by invoice, but it retains the logic of each a little more simple rule).

  Hope that helps...

• The value of rule in State of Siebel models

  Hello guys,.
  
  We try to add multiple values in the value field of rule. For example, the status of Service request "under Testing-QA' would be available when the Type of problem is functional or technical. How to enter the 'Functional' values and 'Technical' without causing an error. I tried to enter two transitions is as well as one for the functional and one is technical, but it wouldn't work. So is it possible that this would be possible?
  
  Help, please.
  
  
  Thank you

  Harnois,

  If I understand your request, you will use the expression of field rule to enter your new requirement using a syntax similar to the syntax for calculated field. The rule of field/operator and the rule value can only be used for the constraint of "simple" rule

  Hope this has helped to clarify

  BR
  EvtLoglvl

• The rule of the Console Help

  I only know the basics of scripting languages. I want to exclude this condition for the simple rule called Console of PICA.

  checkObservationAlarms (#Sun_Console_ErrorVerbose to 1ms #,)

  {the entry->

  If (entry.get ("Severity") == "WARNING") {}

  return 2;

  }

  If (entry.get ("Severity") == 'CRITICAL') {}

  return 3;

  }

  If (entry.get ("Severity") == "FATAL") {}

  return 4;

  }

  return 0;

  },

  {entry, severity-> {switch (severity)}

  case 2:

  return "" + entry.get ("Error_Message") + "";

  case 3:

  return "" + entry.get ("Error_Message") + "";

  case 4:

  return "" + entry.get ("Error_Message") + "";

  by default:

  Return ' ';

  }}, "9f7f00b83f1b546f8d7d3c03de8c7e23") () .size > 0;

  Thank you very much I'm trying it right now.