Print quality image must be exported for web advertising

Similar Questions

• Export for web CC2015: better or worse?

  Hi people,

  I must have missed something.

  Export for the web old fashioned way you choose the profile of colors... and 'new' export seems not to have this feature.

  Same image exported with new exports right lost red colors.

  The image is much more neutral. But if I can't fix this... better stick with good old for web export...

  Also note that with the same JPEG compression (50%), that the "not" export provide a file size about half. How they do that?

  Thanks for the clues

  Didier

  

  I prefer the legacy SFW. Some speculations that the other export features were released in advance.

  Could you also know the extension, export assistance. A button to access the features.

  https://creative.Adobe.com/addons/products/12270#.VZwlbYsWlW9

  Gene

• Whitespace around image when you save for Web

  I have to draw a simple square in Illustrator CS6 then export it to a PNG using save for Web. The preview shows 1px thick of white space on the right side. Sometimes it's on 2 sides or more.

  No other hidden element is around the image. Clip on the artboard in not clicked.

  Why is it happening and how to get rid of him?

  For once I want to meet a good post and say somehting about snap to grid of pixels.

  Turn it on

  Your image now align with the pixel grid

  

  Turn the power off when you do not not web work, or will you crazy in the car.

• Export for Web/PC of PAL settings

  Hello

  I work primarily in video production for playback on a PC or the Web; usually from SD PAL and widescreen.

  So I try to export to Progressive standards 4:3 but crop source 4:3 so that I can resize the video to "square" standard dimensions (320 x 240, 480 x 360, etc.).

  Normally, I choose the H.264 - YouTube SD preset. Change to the PAL standard (which restores the size of frame for some reason any), harvest 4:3 and the size of the image to 640 x 480. I just leave all the other settings by default and export.

  However, with CS5 new preset for Vimeo, I noticed that it affects the proportions 1:1 - pixel square. While the YouTube preset keeps it to 4:3. I never noticed that before exports still looks correct.

  Which is right, is that what I've been doing wrong all this time? What is the 'best' procedure to export the PAL video to PC and web video?

  Thanks for any response.

  I reason on the assumption that, if you resize a video in 720 x 576 (D1/DV PAL 1.09) 640 width, the width must be 512?

  Fix.

  But change to square Pixels should enable a size of 640 x 480; without boarders and cropping?

  Fix again.

  Black borders appear only if you resize 16 x 9 material to 640 x 480 (which is 4 x 3), not if you resize to 640 x 360.

  Again, the export with pixels square like this:

  16 x 9-->> 640 x 360

  4 x 3-->> 640 x 480

  Then you will not have black borders. Check in the output tab before you run the file.

• The image exceeds the size to make save for Web and devices has been designed

  I just upgraded from CS3 to CS5. I assumed that save for Web & devices would have been redesigned so that it would not complain with modern large pictures they were just too big!

  However, it still doesn't work. I just do not get it. Photoshop in general now is editing of very large images. It should be able to manage them also in this function.

  Is this just a legacy message, or is it really true that this feature can only manage small images?

  Save for web is designed to optimize the web graphics by squeezing the bytes while retaining the quality.  It was not intended to scale and then optimize large images. This is shown in the alert message.

  You can present a feature request to Adobe to change the original intent of SFW.

  SFW can display 4 versions of an image in different types of optimization. We must save the 4 temporary files. Imagine trying to save a huge image 4 times at a time through the "File-Save As. That's why you see this warning message. It takes time to build these temporary files, especially when you throw a huge file at home.

  Consider a solution scripted this one where a copy of your image is first reduced and then transferred to SFW.

• Export of web problem

  Hello

  I have a problem with the export for the web, and devices. I use this script:

  var vOptions = new ExportOptionsSaveForWeb();

  vOptions.format = SaveDocumentType.JPEG;

  vOptions.quality = 90;

  myPsDoc.exportDocument (vFile, ExportType.SAVEFORWEB, vOptions);

  Everything works well except if before using this script, I manually export for web and devices and choose "HTML" or "HTML and images" on the format list. After that, when I run my script, I have the html file (or html file and image file in the folder) and not image.

  How can I change this setting?
  

  Thank you for your help.
  

  Yes, it's a bug, but there is a workaround by recording using output I.e. scriptlistener

  var saveFile = File(Folder.desktop + "/deleteMe.jpg");
  SaveForWeb(saveFile,80.);
  
  function SaveForWeb(FileName,Quality) {
  var doc = activeDocument;
  if (doc.bitsPerChannel != BitsPerChannelType.EIGHT) doc.bitsPerChannel = BitsPerChannelType.EIGHT;
      var desc7 = new ActionDescriptor();
          var desc8 = new ActionDescriptor();
          desc8.putEnumerated( charIDToTypeID('Op  '), charIDToTypeID('SWOp'), charIDToTypeID('OpSa') );
          desc8.putEnumerated( charIDToTypeID('Fmt '), charIDToTypeID('IRFm'), charIDToTypeID('JPEG') );
          desc8.putBoolean( charIDToTypeID('Intr'), false );
          desc8.putInteger( charIDToTypeID('Qlty'), Quality );
          desc8.putInteger( charIDToTypeID('QChS'), 0 );
          desc8.putInteger( charIDToTypeID('QCUI'), 0 );
          desc8.putBoolean( charIDToTypeID('QChT'), false );
          desc8.putBoolean( charIDToTypeID('QChV'), false );
          desc8.putBoolean( charIDToTypeID('Optm'), true );
          desc8.putInteger( charIDToTypeID('Pass'), 1 );
          desc8.putDouble( charIDToTypeID('blur'), 0.000000 );
          desc8.putBoolean( charIDToTypeID('EICC'), false );
          desc8.putBoolean( charIDToTypeID('Mtt '), false );
          desc8.putInteger( charIDToTypeID('MttR'), 255 );
          desc8.putInteger( charIDToTypeID('MttG'), 255 );
          desc8.putInteger( charIDToTypeID('MttB'), 255 );
          desc8.putBoolean( charIDToTypeID('SHTM'), false );
          desc8.putBoolean( charIDToTypeID('SImg'), true );
          desc8.putEnumerated( charIDToTypeID('SWch'), charIDToTypeID('STch'), charIDToTypeID('CHsR') );
          desc8.putEnumerated( charIDToTypeID('SWmd'), charIDToTypeID('STmd'), charIDToTypeID('MDNn') );
          desc8.putBoolean( charIDToTypeID('SSSO'), false );
              var list2 = new ActionList();
          desc8.putList( charIDToTypeID('SSLt'), list2 );
          desc8.putBoolean( charIDToTypeID('DIDr'), false );
          desc8.putPath( charIDToTypeID('In  '), new File( FileName) );
      desc7.putObject( charIDToTypeID('Usng'), stringIDToTypeID('SaveForWeb'), desc8 );
      executeAction( charIDToTypeID('Expr'), desc7, DialogModes.NO );
  };
  

• Save for web 72 dpi

  CS5 running on a 64-bit win 7 PC...

  When I use the option 'save for web' and select the 'include all the metadata information '.

  the recorded image (jpeg) isn't to 72 dpi, which is much better for the web, this is apparently the idea for our screens resolution.

  Instead it saves it at 300ppi

  (no please no debate on 72 dpi v's XXX ppi, there are enough posts on it).

  But if you disable metadata option 'include' then the image save as a jpg 72 dpi that I need.

  Someone has an answer to that.

  There is no reason why an image can be saved at 72 dpi and have metadata.

  Assumed that the entire function "save for web" is on the optimization of the image for this reason.

  This looks like a bug to me?

  so we're back to integrate adobe original, this feature for some reason, we all can edit, size of the image in PS, easy goto

  But adobe added this feature where you can choose "bi-cubique sharpness, etc etc...

  and that's why I want my metadata maintained in place and 72 DPI or 96 as stated above. That's why I always think it's a bug.

  I'm afraid you are confusing yourself and mixture of unrelated facts.

  PPI is unrelated to the web images. It is to be printed.

  A x 100px 100px image will appear on screen as 100 pixels of the image pixel x 100 image regardless of the screen resolution or image.

  Save for Web removes or retains metadata such as the copyright info, contact and camera to reduce the size of the file. That's all.

• Unable to save a slice with the original size using save for Web

  Hello

  For some odd reason, I can't increase the percentage more 45.84% in the section of the dialog Web Image size, save for

  so whenever I have save a slice, it ends up to half the original size.

  

  I remember ever change a setting that can get there... How Photoshop could prevent you to save your image in original size?

  Please help me. I manage to get the slice in the original size now to meet the deadline for my project.

  As far as I know, photoshop for the web economy imposes a limit of size about 8182 pixels height or width and if the range or image is larger, save for web shows that the image/slice has been resized.

  The strange part is if is not a click on one of the options the Image size, the image/slice seems to be saved in the original format, even if it is greater than 8192 pixels in height or width.

• Color Laserjet 2605dtn - deteriorated quality printing (with images for comparison)

  I have had my HP Color Laserjet 2605dtn for about 5 years and have been very happy with it.

  But last week, I noticed that my print quality has deteriorated over time.

  I noticed by accident after the reprint of a color image, that I had already printed two years ago and after that comparison of the two it became clear that both the sharpness that the colors are not what they used to be.

  I use my printer quite often but not on this scale it might show "wear" already. I'm a teacher and so my wife and we print and photo assignments at home from time to time, but the printer is not used as a printer of office of all kinds.

  Attached to this post, you will find two pictures of the same image (a board game cards, I have DIY'ed two years ago) and you can see that the images either crisp and bright colors while the other is a little blurry and pale colors.

  I've already printed or a configuration page that is useful for the experts here determine what teard ant normal wear due to the "age" of the printer or is something else.

  Number of pages printed: 21192

  Number of pages printed colors: 5612

  Monochrome RET = enabled (not sure what that means)

  Toner hp original with black again (to see if it was the cause of my problem)

  All color toners are 25%

  The "bars" of green toner are clean.

  I hope someone can give me an easy solution...

  Thanks in advance.

  I do not see your spare part but the seal should help.

• When you use "Save for Web" with slices, it puts the images exported to a/images folder. Can I turn that off?

  I don't want to create a new folder/images every time I export images. I just want to export directly into the folder I specified.

  Is it possible to change this? I could not find a way.

  Thank you!

  In the save for Web dialog go to the dropdown menu, click change output settings and under saving files, uncheck the Set of Images in the folder

  

• Why 'save for web' or 'Export as... ". ' change the hexadecimal color to my image?

  I save a series of images for use on the Web site using the background color #c54a90. This is achieved my having my background layer filled with color and other images then placing on the top (see screengrab below). However, when I export the image for the web or export in JPG the hexadecimal color replaces #c64a90. Does anyone know why this is? I have my RGB working space set to sRGB and the color profile is also sRGB. When I save it for the web, I tried embedding the profile and do not incorporate the profile and I get the same result. I also tried with and without conversion to sRGB in the Save Panel for web and has also no effect. Can anyone help? He drives me crazy!

  
  

  Here is an example jpg resulting.
  

  

  
  

  Here is the version stratified showing the original hex color:

  
  

  
  

  Compression JPEG WILL change your image color values, because it is a lossy compression format.

  Visually, the colors will be close, but the exact values are supposed to change.

• When I add images in MUSE, do photos resize for web quality (and therefore the page will load pretty quickly) or what I have to do using external software such as photoshop, etc. ? Thank you

  When I add images in MUSE, do photos resize for web quality (and therefore the page will load pretty quickly) or what I have to do using external software such as photoshop, etc. ?

  Also is there a way I can change the email of the contact form for my contact at the same time form a whole.

  I have over 100 contact forms and I want them to send the same email anyway I can do without going one by one?

  Yes, the new image is physically reduced (interpolated/oversampled) to the dimensions of the original image once that replace you it through the portal of IBE.

  Thank you

  Vikas

• Export to JPEG for Web printing

  I recently turned Chicago skyline at night and want to make a canvas print out of it (probably impression of Costco, it's my first time). They only accept JPEGs, so I tried to export the image from lightroom as a result. However, I get this strange effect of training in the jpeg format, which I suppose is the compression algorithm. Is there anyway that I can reduce the effect of the compression more? Or will it not serious on a canvas of 16 x 48 print?

  It is exported with the ripples jpeg:

  

  This is what it looks like before I export:

  

  I export to JPEG (duh) with sRGB and the slider all the way up to 100.

  Add a little noise with effects:

  

  And maybe make some smaller test impressions, cheaper just part of the image that includes the sky and part of a building, to see how good or bad the larger canvas could look like.

• On the image in print quality

  Sometimes, you will notice that when you print an image it does not appear as expected, the colors are just a little off - step as vibrant as you want it to. There is a reason for that, and that's because when you transfer an image on your computer the colors for the image change slightly.

  In the real world and in printing, the colors come from three primary colors - Cyan (light blue), Magenta (Pink) and yellow.  Then there is black which gives depth and a sound signal (CMYK).  However, on your computer screen, you're dealing with a different method. Most of the screens are made up of small LEDs that flash at very high speed to give you the colors you see. These diodes are blue, red and green (RGB).

  Now, these two color combinations are very similar, this is why there is not a radical change, and for some, this change might not be noticeable. Here is an example of printing from the computer-

  

  While this image is superb, the tones in some areas are a little more muted due to how the file was subtly shifted from CMYK to RGB. Now, you can find the details of this image by carefully creating presets for photo through various programs that essentially make up for this change, but there are other easier methods, I found.

  The first of them is to use ePrint. If you have a printer with web functionality, send the photo via email diretly to the printer cancels the transition and renders the image as it was originally. Not all printers have this feature, but it is becoming more common on many newer models often.

  The other method is one that you can use your printer directly if you have a card reader / USB port. Imbernon or load the image on one of these devices you can print again directly avoiding the color conversion. This will give your images a more pristine quality. Take a look at the same image printed directly from a USB key.

  

  Just a little more dynamic and has just a touch more in detail. To get the best quality and results, sometimes it requires outside the box thinking. Generally this method will provide you with great results without any necessary error.

  However, it is important to note that if you want to convert or use a format other than .jpg, it won't work, and you try to change the settings on the program that you use to compensate for the shift in color.

  I hope this information is useful to you guys, if you have any questions contact me for more help!

  Here's a cute baby tiger too!

  

• Put image in Indesign for web designers... Question about res - 72 or 300 ppi?

  I would like to create a blog with an image header. Not too sure that res images I placed in InDesign should be.

  Once the header of the blog I'll export as JPEG at 72 dpi, but when it comes to place the image should i:

  Place the image with 300ppi, then export blog header in JPEG format at 72 dpi?

  OR

  RES change of image at 72 DPI in Photoshop first, place the image in Indesign, and then export blog header in JPEG format at 72 dpi?

  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Thanks in advance for your time!

  Gina R.

  Just place the image.

  Select the image and choose window > Info you will see two things, effective and real.

  Real, is what is the image - and effective is the ppi is after the scaling.

  It is apparent, you need to find that he is above 72 dpi (doesn't bother me if it's 105, 19990000 or 193.392392 or 300 ppi) as long as it's above it.

  Once all the

  File > export, then choose PDF

  Open said PDF in photoshop (one of the few times that it is a legitimate thing to do)

  Then use file > save for Web and choose PNG 24 (or JPEG but PNG gives better quality)

  Also, make sure that your measurements are correct in the Web dialog box.

  That's all.