PS6210XS usable storage

Hi all

I am in the Middle watching a refresh of storage hardware, and I am currently at the PS6210XS with 17x1.2TB 10 K disks SSD SAS and 7x800GB, which has a gross capacity of 26 TB.  I am aware that this table can have accelerated RAID6 configured, so I wonder therefore if someone could let me know the real capacity of "usable" after the RAID and a spare drive have been taken into account?

Thank you very much.

Hello

About 19 to.

Tags: Dell Products

Similar Questions

  • database of songs vs clarification of usable storage capacity

    Any new rocket today. My 2 year old Toshiba Gigabeat is dead - like, but the battery capacity was pitiful. Have a Shure headphones and look forward to this player.

    I read a few posts on storage and this issue has been raised.

    Question: A poster wrote that Sansa Fuze has capacity of 4000 songs "database".   Database suggests to me that the "brain" can manage, sort, file, bookmark, select and play, etc. up to 4000 entries (songs).   How is it that is related to internal vs storage card Micro SD?

    I took a Spanish course at GB 5.4 on internal memory and are planning to buy an SD card for storing music and photos added.  I can get up to a 16 GB card, but need to know if this problem of 'database' limit how much storage can be used.  If Yes, I'll get get a 4 or 8, because adults are not cheap.

    Thank you for your patience and know how.

    Rick W.

    Salem, Oregon

    Will be difficult to surpass the 4000 songs at bitrates > 128 K and the next firmware will increase the limit.

    The maximum number of songs taken currently supported 4000.

    New firmware is due to this quarter.

  • storage problem iPad Pro - is there a fault?

    I have a new iPad 32 GB Pro who claims to have 26.3 GB of usable storage. However, I'm running out of storage already and I do not see why. Depending on the settings > storage my Apps (including software) amounts to 2.2 GB. I have no music, no video and very few photos. I also deleted the cache of Safari and Messages to see if this is the problem but still have no idea why I'm running out of storage. I have less memory than my old 16 GB iPad 3! Any ideas?

    A 32 GB iPad was initially about 28 GB of usable storage after formatting, installation of iOS and all pre-installed applications.

    In addition, subtract your 2 GB of your data and you have remaining 26 GB of free storage space.

    What is your iPad Pro tell you currently?

    What is the current amount of free space that is the calculation of your iPad Pro?

  • How many songs can be store in an IPod touch 64GB?

    How many songs can be store in an IPod touch 64GB?

    If you want to just load up on music and do not load on apps and leave about 4 GB of free space for a reliable operation of iOS and depending on the quality of encoding, compression of data or not, of anywhere, at least 4000 songs and, eventually, up to perhaps 8 000 songs or, approx.

    My new, 6th gen iPod Touch, 64 GB of storage (56 GB of usable storage space) has my music library complete on this subject with about 2000 songs that use 16 GB of storage on my device

    I use the best encoding settings formats AIFF or Apple Lossless quality.

    I have about 23 GB of free storage space.

    So I wouldn't be able to get up for another 2500 songs or so, if I use another 20 GB of free space for the music, for a CA.  total of 4500 songs.

  • How much space I'll assign to 10 windows?

    I own a macbook air early 2015. It has about 70-80 GB of usable storage after you have added all my pictures and music, now I intend to install windows on my mac 10. How much space to partition windows bootcamp is recommended?

    PS: - I use windows for mostly gaming.

    You need at least 50-60 GB for W10 - How to install Windows using Boot Camp - Apple Support . You may need more depending on the memory installed on your specific model.

  • My macbook shows 119 GB of total space instead of the designed 120 GB

    I erased my macbook SSD to install el captain and since then, the total space available about this mac > storage shows 119.45 instead of 120.77 as before. No idea how to solve this problem?

    Not sure why he showed 120.77 before, 120,77 sounds like the physical capacity of the drive, however the usable storage volume will always be a little lower than this, 9% to be precise. See the article below for more information on this topic, its normal.

    ard-disk-loses-some-space-after-formatting-https://www.DaniWeb.com/hardware-and-software/Microsoft-Windows/threads/432819/h

    I hope that answers your question!

  • question: How can I format external h. disk connected to the computer by USB. Thank you, scrameric

    Computer is Windows XP Home Operating System and I would like to format hard drive is connected in a basket through the USB port to the decision-making of the motherboard... The problem is that the computer recognizes that the drive has been connected, but it is not present in the list of workstation. It is defined as working properly and turned on, but not recognized as a drive of usable storage. I understand that if it has been correctly formatted it would be accepted, as are the other external storage drives that I use. Thanks for your suggestions.

    Click Start > right click my computer > manage. In the left pane, click Disk Management. The content should expand in the right pane. Right-click on the device and choose assign a drive letter.

  • SanDisk ultra fit 128 GB of low size, slow and defective

    I just bought 3 USB keys at amazon. A 128 GB PNY (very fast) and 2 Sandisk ultra fit (32 GB and 128 GB). The Sandisk 128 GB must errors about 114 Go in 115 GB of total space. I plan to replace with amazon, but wonder it is possible to download some software from Sandisk to try to 'fix' the faulty unit. I've never done this before, where my question. I read on some overheating problems on this forum that could be the cause of the cells fried in flash. I don't know anything about, but it raises concerns about the ability to keep the camera steady for the 5-year warranty you provide. I have reflected on a downloadable software on your Internet site for repair, but found none. Could you please answer to, it is possible to fix it or if I better return it for a refund and get another brand or maybe even just a simple replacement. Speed of 4K of the 128 GB it is half that of the 32 GB (read and write - 3½MB/s against 7 Mbps and 2 Mbps vs. 4 MB/s). Usable storage of 128 GB of Sandisk's 115GB. The PNY 128 GB usable storage is 126 GB. The issue of size is of no interest, just raise it now that I had a problem. However, the issue of speed could be linked to the flash error and raise a few red flags.

    Thank you

    Kasper Lindvig

    I'm not aware of all solve this software for your problem, and even if there is I would not recommend it for a new purchase.  What you bought seems to be used or defective and I return it.  And I would buy one that follows from a different source.

    You also have the option to send it to SanDisk for a replacement, who will be guaranteed is not a used one.

  • 9271 LSI on C240M3 reports constantly "sense unexpected."

    I have a relatively new (2 months or almost) C240M3, happened to pass by the MMIC today and I noticed the log storage has the following entry of the RAID controller every 3-10 min:

    "Feel unexpected: Encl. PD 08 path a80c0dc0ce0000bd, PEH: 1a 08 1 c 00 ff 00, feel: 5/00/00.

    the CDB alternates between that which precedes and "1a 00 08 00 ff 00" from time to time.

    My interpretation of the message and a little googling, I think told me there is a new drive to slot 8 (or PD08), however I have no drive in slot 8, the MMIC physical disk Info tab confirms that the beach is empty and my current account of physical disk is correct. I noticed that my Device ID box is 8 under reader information and checked all 14 records for any other information that matches the message, my OEM SSD have SAS paths of "a80c0dc0ce00008a" and "a80c0dc0ce00008b" which is very close to the 'journey' in the list, but not a match and none of my SAS drives are still close to him.

    Any ideas on what is that message?

    I think you might be hitting this bug (as long as you use the recommended drivers for the controller): https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuj10535 , it reads "VMware seems to treat all storage devices in the same way, whether they are righteous or enclosures SAS drives. The messages that you see means (ESX) host sending commands in mode sense envelope and the envelope do not give a valid answer because the commands in mode sense are not a command that must be sent to a speaker. If the unexpected sense of enclosure messages are benign info. »

    Check workaround:

    "

    Is there way to 'disconnect' the enclosure from the point of view of ESX. It should not have a negative impact that the speaker is not a usable storage device.

    For now, you can try the following on your test system:
    1. open the ESX console
    2. run this command: 'esxcli storage core device list' and look for the device that was "pregnant" in its name.
    3. write down its identifier, usually beginning by naa...
    4. run this command: "esxcli storage device together--State = off? d NAA.x"but replace naa.x with the ID of your device.
    This should eliminate the messages of the vmkernel.log and Cisco Storage BMI journal. »

    HTH

    -Note all useful answers

    Kenny

  • ESXI & HP VSA data store size

    Is - well configured?

    I have 2 hosts HP DL360P VMware 5.5 with 2 500 GB hard drives with hardware raid 1. iSCSI data store configured with 690 GB of disk space in vSphere. 2 HP VSA is appearing 350GB of storage available. The HP CMC shows 690 GB of available disk space. When I install the volume, RAID10, and available disk space as thick, it shows a maximum of 347GB - because of RAID10 storage space.

    My concern is the gap in the amount of available storage space depending on whether display you the data in vSphere (690 GB datastore) store and the CMC showing only 347 GB of usable storage space. So in vSphere it will probably lead someone to believe that there are more storage available there are currently available on the volume.

    Is something wrong with that or should it?

    Mystery solved, someone has decreased the size of the volume in the CMC, which explains the difference in size.

  • failure of the system, looking for answers

    Need help for the guys. Had a major failure of the system last week, and I'm a bit confused as to what happened and why I was unable to get free. I lost a bit of my confidence in Vsphere, and I'd like to renew that.

    A bit on the environment, esxi 5.0 U1, with servers HP Gen 8 3 node cluster running. HP P4500 SAN iscsi for vmfs data storage. ESXi is installed on HP's CF cards in servers. This cluster has been upward and running for about 6 months, not a single hiccup before that.

    Wednesday we have migrated 2 of our vm (SQL and progress) to this cluster 5.0 database, the virtual machine went on different hosts in the cluster. The virtual machine was running on a cluster 2 older nodes with esxi 4.1 U2. Machines migrated fine, fine tools updates, reboot, everything seemed fine.

    About 2 hours after that the migration, we started to receive calls that our Progress database is down, users could not connect. Then we started getting more calls, other machines were inaccessible. Glancing from vcenter I could see all the virtual machines in question were on the same host, and I was unable to open the console in vsphere for VMs on that host. The host showed he was connected, showed all the vm connected, but I could not open the console or the desktop remotely to one of the VMs on that host. I started studying, and of course this host fell all the SAN Iscsi network connections. The railways have shown dead. Ports of nic card viewed active, the switch ports showed activity, but the connections were down. I could always ping the address of management for the host however, and ports for vmotion were in place.

    At this point, I started to try and vmotion VMs on that host data base progress, he would not migrate, just sat at 8% prepare to migrate. I tried other virtual machines with the same result. I started to wonder why HA had not kicked, and why I couldn't move anything. At this stage the host started disconnecting from the cluster. I could always ping on the host, but vsphere showed as disconnected. I couldn't move my VM, and I couldn't go to the host via vcenter, via the vsphere client pointed directly to the host, or by using the DCUI.

    So I called VMware support, got an engineer on the line with me, and it became clear we were going to have to power cycle that host and crash all virtual machine running on it. It wasn't a very pleasant for me answer because this database of progress is our main production system, and I was afraid of corruption. We had no choice, so we did. When the host came back upward, fortunately the virtual machine came very well. VMware engineer digging in the newspapers and said that this was with a particular NIC card driver with known issues. He showed me the KB on this issue, and it seemed to be a known issue. We have updated these drivers on all hosts, and that's all.

    My problem with this is that, how is the cluster ran fine for 6 months without problem, and how come the redundant path to the SAN did not keep the connection active when with the path with the bad nic card driver failed? I have 2 different, with 2 NICs different paths for the Iscsi SAN. The other card had no known driver issue. Why both paths failed not just in cause of a driver on one of the cards problem? More worrying is also how is it that I could not immigrate anything, and why no HA kick in?

    Sorry for the novel here, but without all the details is not part of a story. My biggest concern, that's why I couldn't move anything? In the event of a host failure, what you're supposed to do in order to migrate the machines if they don't migrate via vsphere client? We were down for about 2.5 hours, and a lot of questions were thrown on me the senior management as to why my "system available, redundant high" took hours to retrieve...

    Guys here any ideas, thoughts on how I would have handled it differently, reasons why I should be confident everything is fine now?

    Thanks for your time

    Kevin

    trink408 wrote:

    Thanks Matt.

    I guess some of the problem is not completely understand how the HA or Vmotion. I was under the impression once that the virtual machine was not reachable HA wouldn't kick and move the virtual machine? The virtual machine was not to ping requests or accessible by the Office remotely. I couldn't get their power off or do anything through vcenter either.

    If they had no link usable storage, this seems possible.  HA simply does not address the failures of storage.  Not at all.  It IS possible to activate at the level of the VM HA, but it isn't on by default - must be activated on a per-VM basis.  You should read the book by Duncan Epping on this - it's the bible of the AH.

    So in case something happens with the connection of storage, you have really no way to vmotion anything right here, and your only option is to kill the host / VM running on it, and then migrate or leave HA move them?

    Fix.

    I didn't know that I wouldn't be able to vmotion virtual machine if the host has lost its connection to storage. The other hosts in the cluster saw storage.

    The source host is controlling these VMDK, as far as the other guests are concerned (they see a lock on the file) and when they ask the host if its still alive, he answers (because it has not powered the network lost or down, which are the failure mode THAT HA is designed to handle). So they take charge.

    The reason why it took so long was because I didn't kill the host with my concerns for the database. I was hoping that the VMware engineer may have a way to gracefully close things down. So he spent some time looking around and trying to determine what was going on. Ultimately we just power cycle the host, so I could have done much earlier, and if we are facing this again in the future, I would.

    As long as you follow the seller advised for more decent databases (keeping the transaction logs, etc.), don't have good backups, theres no real risk of data corruption.  VMware does not significantly change the i/o path, in order to have the same exposure than on a physical host.

    I still do not understand why the two paths were marked as dead and the host completely lost connection to the SAN, as well as to show finally disconnected in vcenter.

    Well the host went offline because it got stuck in an all-paths-down scenario, which is common for 5.0.  5.1 solves this problem a little.  I don't know why all roads fell, but I suspect that you have a misconfig somewhere... normally you expect at least 4 paths in a system set up correctly on the left.  Check with HP to ensure that you follow best practices.

    Maybe all the IP stack has been corrupted or something?

    Possible, of course, but unlikely.  Never heard before.

    I appreciate the help and the preview, I thought that the problem was a lack of understanding on my part and fully accept it.

    HA and vMotion are complex.  At least now you can go back to mgmt and tell them why he fell more (because it was a failure outside the scope of the software scenario) and may ask for money to build a proper SQL cluster.  Definitely recommend the book of Duncan Epping: http://www.amazon.com/VMware-vSphere-Clustering-Technical-Deepdive/dp/1463658133/ref=la_B002YJMRCY_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1363622697&sr=1-2

  • iSCSI LUN maximum

    So I'm looking at the documentation for maximum rates of configuration and it is said that the maximum LUN of Fiber Channel is 2 TB. This also applies to the iSCSI LUNS?  For example, I have an iSCSI LUN 5 TB ESX 'sees', but when I try to establish VMFS on it and add it to the usable storage, it allows me to choose the whole 5 TB, but only write 930GB and says "complete".

    I have to chunck this 5 to in max 2 TB LUNs, and then write my 5 to VMFS on multiple LUNS instead of one?

    Thank you!

    Yes, the limitation applies to iSCSI too. As you said already correctly, you must present the LUNS with Max 2 TB less than 512 bytes.

    The reason for this limitation, see http://kb.vmware.com/kb/3371739

    André

  • Size of physical disk in RAID Utility

    Hello

    I just purcahsed a Dell Power edge 620 and am trying to configure the virtual disks of RAID. I noticed that, before even as I set up the RAID type physical disk sizes indicated by the utility RAID is less than the size of real disk. Why would it be?

    For example all the 146 GB drive shows at 136,12 GB and all 300 GB disk showing only 278.7 GB

    I never configured the HP servers and they always showed the same size disk as the size of the acutal disc.

    Here is my configuration:

    Disc 2 x 146 GB RAID 1 configured

    10 x 300 GB drives configured for RAID 5

    RAID Controller PERC H710P adapter Bios configuration utility 4.03 - 0002

    is nayone knows why this would be? is this s setting?

    It's normal... explanation:
    http://www.dslreports.com/FAQ/9716

    If HP tells you the size, then they are like Apple made and shows you the binary size.  Windows and other operating systems and devices (Dell tools) and even some Linux distributions will show you the size in decimal.

    You think that you have found all of the 300 GB when presented in binary, but the thing you need to remember is that a file will take more space than decimal, binary for the same reason, fill your fastest storage space.  That storage is provided in binary format or see the usable storage, you will only ever get binary (x) = decimal (.93x) for storage.

  • Storage of ThinkPad Twist

    Hello!

    This will be like a silly question, but I can't answer on my own, so I thought I would ask here.

    My company has just purchased a Lenovo's ThinkPad Twist for me (I'm a big fan of Lenovo). I'm just trying to give a sense specifications for storage. In my local disk system details, he said I have a 456 GB HDD (which I understand to be the hard drive), but on the fact sheet on the product, it says 128 GB SSD (that I understand to be a solid state drive). I think it means that I have both, in other words, I have storage hybrid, right? And if I don't have a hybrid storage, is it correct to assume that the solid state drive is used to store my files on the system and it is inaccessible as usable for me storage space, right? I noticed that the speed at which the system starts and I know that it is an advantage of SSDS. I like that!

    I learn only recently on the SSDS and I am eager to learn more. I would appreciate any information anyone! Thank you!

    The most common for a twist storage options are either:

    (1) HARD drive coupled with a small mSATA SSD storage (about 24 GB) hybrid. In this configuration, the SSD is used only as a caching drive. Transparent caching disk data caches to speed up startup and operating system and is generally not accessible to the user. If you have a caching drive, it is usually as a disk 1 tab of the Task Manager performance and disk 0 is normally the main drive.

    (2) SSD without disk caching. More full-size SSD being faster than the getting started disc cache which is included on these models, there is no point in adding in an mSATA cached disk.

    Your business could have gone with configuration, either a custom when ordering the machine configuration. You can watch the PO to determine how your company has decided to set up the machine.

  • Technology Intel Rapid Storage from BIOS

    I have an Aspire S5 with a 128 GB SSD. The SSD is seen in the laptop as two 64 GB drives and is configured as RAID0 as default. At one point the RAID has not and I tried factory reset, but the laptop would not get into the recovery mode (by pressing ALT + F10 and all variants of ALT/CTRL/F keys) then I reinstalled manually with a USB key.

    In the BIOS, both drives are considered to be of 64 GB, but Windows only a drive on which I have installed is considered 64 GB, it is still considered the RAID drive (128 GB). It is not usable because I need to format it first, but I dare not do this. I see that the recoverypartition is still on it, but since in RAID0 RAID0, I'm assuming that all data on this partition Ghost is not usable in some way.

    When starting the laptop I get the fast Intel Rapid Storage Technology technology (press CTRL + I), and it is said that the RAID has failed, listing the two disks (partitions), one of them as a member and the other (the one I reinstalled Windows on) not as a member. So I deleted this configuration and recreate and reinstall Windows again. But when I deleted the configuration I can access any more to technology Intel Rapid Storage Technology, the guest never happen! It just directly boots into Windows. By pressing CTRL + I on startup does not, probably because the FIRST is not loading...

    I'm going to assume that the recoverypartition disappeared forever, since I have already reinstalled on one of the partitions, but I'd like to at least get a RAID running again.

    TL; DR - technology Intel Rapid Storage Technology itself uninstalled from the Board of Directors, how can I enable it again?

    If you are not using windows 7, I strongly suggest you to re - install under UEFI.

    I suggest you update the BIOS if no update for your S5 is available, perhaps this may solve your problem of TSRI:

    http://www.Acer.com/AC/en/us/content/support

    If you still have problem with CTRL-I

    Have a look here:

    http://community.Acer.com/T5/S-and-R-series-laptops/R13-R7-371T-RAID-0/TD-p/366145/page/2

    and check the post of KEHinWA

Maybe you are looking for