Question of tipping pix 515e

Similar Questions

• Question of BandNew PIX 515E

  I got some new PIX 515E security infra-red and I had sex 2 questions about everything I tried. I installed a 5 port switch inside and cannot ping anything from the console. I have a computer on the switch, and he is able to ping other devices on the switch, but not the PIX.

  What I find strange is that when I try to ping from the inside interface on the PIX of one inside computers, PIX displays the MAC address of the computer inside in the arp table.

  My goal is to upgrade the PIX to ver7.0 but I can't do so until I can solve this problem.

  Here are some information among the PIX.

  #sh worm

  Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.3 (4)

  Cisco PIX Device Manager Version 3.0 (2)

  Updated Saturday 2 July 04 00:07 by Manu

  pixfirewall up to 29 minutes 33 seconds

  Material: PIX-515E, 128 MB RAM, Pentium II 433 MHz processor

  Flash E28F128J3 @ 0 x 300, 16 MB

  BIOS Flash AM29F400B @ 0xfffd8000, 32 KB

  Hardware encryption device: VAC + (Crypto5823 revision 0 x 1)

  0: ethernet0: the address is 0015.625a.f7da, irq 10

  1: ethernet1: the address is 0015.625a.f7db, irq 11

  2: ethernet2: the address is 000d.8810.902c, irq 11

  3: ethernet3: the address is 000d.8810.902d, irq 10

  4: ethernet4: the address is 000d.8810.902e, irq 9

  5: ethernet5: the address is 000d.8810.902f, irq 5

  Features licensed:

  Failover: enabled

  VPN - A: enabled

  VPN-3DES-AES: disabled

  The maximum physical Interfaces: 6

  Maximum Interfaces: 10

  Cut - through Proxy: enabled

  Guardians: enabled

  URL filtering: enabled

  Internal hosts: unlimited

  Throughput: unlimited

  Peer IKE: unlimited

  This PIX has a failover license only (FO).

  #sh run

  interface ethernet1 100full

  nameif ethernet1 inside the security100

  pixfirewall hostname

  domain testlan

  access-list acl_out permit icmp any one

  No external ip address

  IP address inside 192.168.1.222 255.255.255.0

  No IP failover outdoors

  No IP failover inside

  #sh int e1

  interface ethernet1 'inside' is up, line protocol is up

  The material is i82559 ethernet, the address is 0015.625a.f7db

  IP 192.168.1.222, subnet mask 255.255.255.0

  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit full duplex

  Hi M8,

  Your firewall has a license of FO, you must enable this device to be able to see it.

  Run the command:

  active failover

  With this command, the device turns into the 'Active' from a perspective of failover state. It will work after that.

  See you soon.

  Salem.

• Question of config PIX 515E

  I'm an amateur at this so please be patient with me.

  One of my users is to get an application that needs to communicate with the host of vendors. The seller tells me that my workstation users needs a public IP address to make it work, but they did the job with a NAT IP address ' ed. This is my preferred method of as giving commection to this user that a public IP address would be a difficult task.

  The question is: How can I go about setting up the IP address of users for port 80 and a few other ports (I did receive the other ports still)?

  Relevant config info:

  > outgoing ip access list allow a whole

  > IP outside 170.x.x.242 255.255.255.248

  > IP inside the 10.x.x.1 255.255.254.0

  > route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 170.x.x.241 1

  From other access rules we have put in place for other needs, that's what I think of adding:

  > list of allowed inbound ip access any host 170.x.x.246

  > static (inside, outside) 170.x.x.246 10.x.x.38 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  Which would be correct and if not, what Miss me? If any other information is needed, let me know.

  Thanks in advance,

  Ben

  You have the line:

  Permitted connection ipsec sysopt

  in the configuration?

  If so, that's why you can even remove the command line which allows the ESP. The sysopt opens IPSEC throughout the world and does not check if the list of access on the interfaces.

  sincerely

  Patrick

• Question of PIX 515E

  Hi all

  We just bought a PIX 515E and try to use it, but got a number of questions. Here's the NVA of show:

  PIX-151st #show version

  Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.3 (1)

  Cisco PIX Device Manager Version 3.0 (1)

  Updated Thursday 19 March 03 11:49 by Manu

  PIX-515E up to 5 hours and 15 minutes

  Material: PIX-515E, 64 MB RAM, Pentium II 433 MHz processor

  Flash E28F128J3 @ 0 x 300, 16 MB

  BIOS Flash AM29F400B @ 0xfffd8000, 32 KB

  0: ethernet0: the address is 000f.2457.4b12, irq 10

  1: ethernet1: the address is 000f.2457.4b13, irq 11

  Features licensed:

  Failover: enabled

  VPN - A: enabled

  VPN-3DES-AES: enabled

  Maximum Interfaces: 6

  Cut - through Proxy: enabled

  Guardians: enabled

  URL filtering: enabled

  Internal hosts: unlimited

  Flow: IKE peers unlimited: unlimited

  This PIX has a failover license only (FO).

  Problem is that we cannot ping inner harbor, if we do not switch light, but this is a unique machine. Here's another message once we turn on the switch:

  PIX-515E # config t

  WARNING *.

  Configuration of replication is NOT performed the unit from standby to Active unit.

  Configurations are no longer synchronized.

  PIX-515e (config) #.

  Please help solve this problem. I wonder if we buy the wrong license? Thank you very much.

  you have in your possession a PIX failover. That's why says in the "sh run".

  This device is intended to be used only as a failover for a live device. It will work as a live PIX, but behave badly. It is cheaper than a PIX with an unrestricted license, as it is not intended to be used as a standalone device. Check with the one that you bought to get the situation sorted.

  Good luck

  Steve

• PIX 515E failover recover

  I have two PIX 515E firewall v7.01 configured in a failover scenario.

  The two units were operating without problem. Primary worked very well and the configuration changes have been transferred to secondary school.

  By TAC support, the only thing needed to test the failover was to issue a command to 'reload' in the primary and the secondary, take on main. Then, "active failover" question on the once rebooted device it was up in the secondary role.

  Failover to the secondary unit worked without problem, it is a smooth transition to the secondary unit.

  The problem came in that the original primary unit is stuck in a loop when you try to reload with what looks like now configuration errors. It will not properly start upward.

  Is not a valid procedure to test the failover?

  It seems that in the real world, this could actually happen that failover should work?

  Among what is shown:

  Config ERROR: invalid journal / level keyword specified; level must be emergencies (0) - debugging (7)

  Config error - acl_in list extended access permit tcp any newspaper SMTP host 208.13.32.36 eq

  Out of config line 359, "access-list acl_in exten...". »

  Config sync error: Suite not command could be executed in standby mode

  Platform

  acl_in list access permit tcp any host 208.13.32.36 eq smtp log inactive

  Use BREAK or ESC to interrupt boot.ridge/vlan/modify flash): m

  e inactivea VLAN

  REPLICATION OF CONFIGURATION OF ACTIVE TOWARDS THE RESCUE UNIT IS INCOMPLETE,

  Reading of 115200 bytes of the image of the flash.

  TO AVOID THE EVE OF TAKING OVER AS ACTIVE WITH A PARTIAL CONFIGURATION UNIT, THE EMERGENCY UNIT WILL NOW RESTART *.

  You're not going to like this answer.

  It seems that commands typed in and abstract by cisco in the configuration are not valid when copied/pasted in or when the firewall is rebooted or receives an active firewall configuration.

  I don't know exactly what you did, but here's what I did to reproduce your problem:

  I typed in the command:

  acl_in list access permit tcp any host 208.13.32.36 eq smtp interval 300 inactive information newspaper

  Given that "interval 300 ft newspaper is the default, it is actually saved in the running-config like:"

  acl_in list access permit tcp any host 208.13.32.36 eq smtp log inactive

  It's * not * a command invalid (the word "journal" following address must be a logging level), if you try to kick it. When you restarted the firewall, he tried to shoot the active configuration of the device (because it is now pending), received this line and since he can't run it (because it is not a valid command), it keeps restarting itself so that it cannot take over and be the active firewall.

  Best way to do is to hold this line (and other lines like him) outside the firewall active now - the line is marked "inactive" in any case, this should not affect you. The other way would be to change that line to something by default (the recording level change may be easier). In this way when the primary/secondary itself restarts again, the order received will have a valid log level (or if you take the lines out, they will not be a problem) and will allow the rest of the configuration process.

  You can also report to cisco as a bug, if they are not combing these forums already.

  -Jason

  This rate if this can help.

• PIX 515e - Web VPN

  Hello

  Just a quick question, am I right to think that a PIX 515e would not support Web VPN?

  Concerning

  J Mac

  You are right!

• Cannot ping PIX 515e Interfaces

  I know it's a very silly question for this forum, but I have already tried many things and cannot get the answer from the PIX firewall interfaces.

  It's my (very easy) installation:

  Using a FastEthernet port on router, I have a cable connected directly to the outside I / F of the PIX-515e. (Crossover cable works, I have already tested). Router <-->PIX directly connected.

  I configured the PIX firewall to allow pings (I used different commands):

  ICMP allow any response of echo outdoors

  ICMP allow all outside

  ICMP permitted - echo outside response

  I tried to configure each of them and also combined.

  Also tried to send the PIX to its default values. Supposed to be after that the PIX should allow all pings if no "icmp" command is configured.

  I have configured the ports on both sides to 100 Full

  On both sides of the link (PIX and router) I have the links to the top. The lights are on.

  The 'show interest' on the PIX firewall shows to the top/top

  The same thing on the router...

  The two interfaces are configured in

  10.1.1.0/24 (10.1.1.1 & 10.1.1.2)

  What I am doing wrong?

  This should be very easy...

  Hello

  Majority of the time interfaces refuses explicitly to ICMP packets unless you indicate otherwise. Here is a link to a pretty good setup guide... Have a look at the link to the ping Security Appliance Interfaces section in this guide. I'm really frustrated myself during the installation/testing phase because the pings are not working and it helped. Hope this helps a little and makes your life easier =) (rate if it please and thank you)

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00805521b6.html#wp1059645

  Thank you

  Chris

• IPSEC VPN between Pix 515E and 1841 router

  Hi all

  BACKGROUND

  We have implemented a site to site VPN IPSEC between a Pix 515E 8.0 operation (4) and an 1841 using static IP addresses at both ends. We used CCP on the router and the ASDM the pix to build initial tunnels. Now the site with the router is evolving into a dynamic IP address from the ISP so we have implemented dynamic DNS to update dynamic IP address.

  PROBLEM

  The problem is that ASDM will not allow us to set a domain as the address of peers, it will not accept an IP address. We believe that the solution will be to remove the static Crypto map and replace it with a dynamic Crypto map on the side of Pix. Our questions are simply; is this the best solution? can change us the original static list or is it better to delete and make a new dynamic encryption card? Y at - it a shortcut to change the config command-line? This is a real network, so just check it out before make us any changes on the live kit.

  Any help much appreciated.

  You don't have to change anything when the peer-address changes. The dynamic crypto map aims to take dynamic peer connections. The only thing to remember, is that only the dynamic peer can initiate the connection. And you reduce your security if you use Pre-Shared key that now you can use a generic-PSK character.

  As I remember, the PIX / ASA does not support the dynamic use of FQDNs for peer-resolution. This feature is supported in IOS.

  For a feature, it would be preferable to static IP addresses on both sides.

• 4240 IPS blocking queries with Pix 515E

  I have activated the lock on the 4240 and put locking as our Pix 515E. When I look at the Configurations of Signature quite a few Signature Actions are set to alert only produce. If blocking is enabled you also go and the Actions of signing the Deny value or TCP Reset? So far my attackers show dosen't IPS refused and he detected the high level of traffic which I assume must now be blocked. Thanks John

  Yes, go under the signatures that you want and enable blocking for them as an action. Globally blocking configuration (setting the blocking device, the interface, the connection of the device information, etc.), does not actually blocked on the sensor itself, we must still go and activate the blocking of this particular signature. When this particular GIS fires in the future, the sensor it will block on the device that you configured.

  Be very careful with blocking, the reason that we're not blocking simply all the signatures, it is that it would be very dangerous to blindly add access lists to a device that will stop traffic. You must first make sure that you don't get any number of false positives on the signatures and end up blocking valid traffic. In addition, on a busy sensor you could easily overrun detector and locking to writing and deleting 1000's of top access lists. And finally, although probably not, blocking can even be used as an attack denial of service, where an attacker, if they know what signatures you block, can usurp packages past your sensor so that it denies traffic to our legitimate guests.

  You have to look at what signatures you really want to block, and then enable blocking on them individually.

• Cisco VPN Client Authentication - PIX 515E-UR

  Hi all

  I need your expert help on the following issues I have:

  1. I would like to create more than 1 client VPN on my PIX-515E groups. This is so that I can give a different part of the internal network access to different type of VPN connection. For example, I want a group to have no XAUTH, while the other group must use RADIUS XAUTH. Is it possible for me to do this? I see the PIX automatically enable RADIUS on both groups of VPN clients.

  2. the RADIUS server is a Microsoft ISA with IAS server and it is located on the PIX inside interface. The VPN endpoint is external interface of the PIX. Is there a problem with this Setup? Do I need to have the RADIUS server that is located on the external interface?

  3 can. what command I use to debug RADIUS authentication?

  Thanks in advance for your help.

  Hi vincent,.

  (1) you can use the vpngroup *-authentication server ipaddress to specify the IP address of the Radius Server on a particular group... If you do not specify this, the authentication of the user is made locally... also check for vpngroup * order of user authentication

  (2) there should be no problem with the installation of your... should work fine... If the RADIUS is outdoors, it is subject to many attacks... so have it inside...

  (3) use the "RADIUS session debug" or "debug aaa authentication..."

  I hope this helps... all the best... the rate of responses if found useful

  REDA

• Clearing its IPSec on a PIX 515E

  Hello

  Is it possible to delete a particular IPSec security association to a PIX 515E Version 6.3 (1)?

  Concerning

  Lisbeth

  Clear [crypto] ipsec his destination-address spi protocol entry

  is what you are looking for.

• PIX 515E for VPN remote site

  Hello

  7.0 (1) version pix

  ASDM version 5.0 (1)

  I have a situation where you go paas-thanks to the VPN feature goes on our PIX 515E. I tried to put this on the pix using a VPN Wizard Site to site

  who is enabled. I was unable to connect to the pix from the remote site. Witch's journal replied negotiate the pix is OK and the success

  The problem is when I try to set up the tunnel to the top of the remote site. I fall without failure.

  where can I see the vpn pix for error log?

  is there a manual for the solution of site to site VPN using the wizard

  Help, please.

  Thanks in advance

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00804acfea.shtml#ASDM

  the section 'use adsm' (step 14) gives an example on how to set up vpn lan - lan via adsm

  Newspaper to go to the section "check".

• Configuration of RADIUS and accounting AAA + PIX-515E

  Dear All;

  I want to put the accounting of PIX.

  Here is the composition of the equipment.

  ACS SE: 4.1.1.23.5

  PIX 515E: 7.0 (6)

  PIX of setting is as follows.

  GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server

  AAA-server GANYMEDE + host xx.xx.xx.xx

  key xxxxx

  order of accounting AAA GANYMEDE +.

  Console telnet accounting AAA GANYMEDE +.

  Thus, the configuration setting was written in ACS.

  But the user name is enable_15. (attached 1.jpg)

  Is it a restriction?

  Kind regards

  Reiji

  Hi Marilou,

  Looks like we have the authority to command configured on the pix. You must enable authentication configured on the RADIUS server then only we would get username is accounting, unlike pix Device IOS doesn't send user name to the RADIUS server, he would send enable_15 as username for all users.

  Configure the following command to make it work.

  AAA authentication enable console LOCAL + Ganymede

  HTH

  -Philou

• RV320 PIX 515E tunnel

  Hi all...
  I have a RV320 (internal LAN 10.78.0.0/24) connection to a PIX 515E (10.10.0.0/24) using the VPN Tunnel.
  The tunnel between the two is in place and working.

  My workstation (10.10.0.47), I can ping and connect to a server on the LAN of RV320 (10.78.0.54)

  Now if I remote in the 10.78.0.54 area, I cannot ping or connect to my desktop (10.10.0.47).
  However, I can ping the inside interface of the PIX 515E 10.10.0.252

  So what am I missing here?

  The LAN is 10.78.0.0/24. Do the remote VPN pool 10.78.1.0/24. Then use 10.78.0.0/23 as the field of encryption.

• PIX 515E failover

  I have a pair of PIX 515E (6.3) running in failover mode. They are currently connected to a single chassis base. We are upgrading our network with the heart, dual 6500's. Is there a way to connect each PIX to a separate kernel (1 PIX - Core1, PIX 2 - Core2) to allow a failure of the base?

  Core 1 and Core 2 will have a L2 link between them. If the current active PIX is connected to Core1 and Core 1 dies, this would not lead to support PIX failover. All LAN traffic would go through Core 2, but since he does not have an active path to the active PIX 1, traffic would drop. My reasoning is correct?

  Is there a way to connect the PIX to two cores running V6.3?

  Hello

  If you use the cable-based failover, you can change the basis of LAN failover.

  Read http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/pix/pix63/configuration/guide/failover.html#wp1024836

  I hope this helps.

  Best regards.

  Massimiliano.