Rules of the authz in ISE 1.2 Max?

Hi all

Is there any doco on what the current limit of rules Auth Z in ISE 1.2

I read 1.1.x had a limit of 140 authz rules.

I also consider the political use sets whether this increases the total authZ rules.

See you soon

Peter,

Here are the numbers for the version 1.1.x and 1.2.  I hope this helps.

* ISE 1.1.x

# ISE 1.2

Authentication policy rules

* 50

# 400

Conditions by the rule of the order of AuthC

u

# 8

Rules of authorization policy

* 140

# 600

Identity authorization groups

* 20

# 1000

Conditions by AuthZ policy rule

* 6

# 8

Authorization profiles

* 30

# 600

Please rate useful messages and mark this question as answered if, in fact, does that answer your question.  Otherwise, feel free to post additional questions.

Charles Moreton

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • How to combine the two groups under the single authorization rule in the OAM

    Hi people,

    I have an authorization rule that allows the user to access resources based on their ldap group memberships (the name of the group appears indeed as a people tab entry allow access). However, it does work if I have a single defined group. I would add another group, OAM begins to enforce an OR operator, instead of one and. In other words, if the rule Authz groups A and B, and that the user is a member of Group B, but no group has, it still gets access. The only way that this works if I create one rule Authz by each LDAP group, I'm interedted, then use one AND inside the Authz Expression.

    Any help is appreciated
    Thank you, novel

    Hi Roman,

    It is as expected. When you select several groups in an authorization rule, you are saying 'allow access to these groups. This is consistent with when you select several people - 'allow access to one of these people. " The everything (i.e. or) is implied and I think that it is valid. In addition, as you say, OAM gives you a way to reach the AND through the expression.

    If your folder is AD or ADAM, membership in the group details are also stored in the user profile and so there, you might be able to achieve what you want in a rule unique authz via LDAP rule.

    -Vinod

  • In all the hearts of Windows games, it seems that they do not know the rules. The Queen of Spades is just like a heart in the real rules

    In all the hearts of Windows games, it seems that they do not know the rules.  The Queen of Spades is just like a heart in the real rules. I don't have to play the Queen.  If hearts have been broken, and all I have left is some hearts and the Queen of Spades, I can play a weak heart rather than being forced to play the Queen.  The windows game apparently does not know this rule.

    original title: rules of hearts

    Hello

    Actually if the Queen of Spades breaks hearts and cannot therefore be considered a heart
    is optional. The basic rule is that the Queen of Spades does not break hearts and must be conducted
    If a player has the Queen of spades and still hearts if hearts have been broken.

    My preferences are the Queen of Spades or a heart can be played on the 1st round Sub in the Clubs.
    And the Queen of Spades does not break the hearts and must be conducted if only he and hearts are
    left in the hands and hearts have not been broken. Those who make for much more difficult game
    MY HUMBLE OPINION.

    Hearts
    http://www.Pagat.com/reverse/hearts.html

    Hearts, the rules
    http://www.toycrossing.com/hearts/basic-rules.shtml

    Hearts
    http://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/hearts

    Hearts
    http://www.kemenel.org/cards/hearts.php

    Plays in the heart and stings for years, but the bridge is even more fun.

    Bridge Base online - play for free at all levels (beginner to the World Champions and yes the world
    Champions play there - it has same vugraphs live tournaments around the world - free.)
    http://www.bridgebase.com/

    I hope this helps.

    Rob Brown - Microsoft MVP<- profile="" -="" windows="" expert="" -="" consumer="" :="" bicycle="" -="" mark="" twain="" said="" it="">

  • How to enable and disable, copy or rename the rules via the groovy script?

    A client, we received this question:

    How to enable and disable, copy or rename the rules via the groovy script?

    Foglight 5.7.5

    Hello

    There is this example of support KB

    support.Software.Dell.com/.../99059

    and there is also documentation of Service layer of the administration on the RuleService console.

    Best regards

    Golan

  • Available rules for the transformation of the URL in the cartridge 5.9.6 Java

    Dear all,

    We have recently improved our cartridge java Java EE 5.8.3 to servers-Java version 5.9.6 Appliction. We are aware that the 5.9.6 version got some default rules for the transformation of the URL. But as we have upgraded, we are not able to find these rules. Please let us know the default rules available for the transformation of the URL.

    Thanks in advance.

    Kind regards

    Red Amandine

    Hello

    Check if this link under edocs help.

    [See:edocs.quest.com/.../frameset.htm]

    Best regards

    Golan

  • Logic and rules of the NAC

    I have a question about WINXP rules in the NAC server and more specifically, if a rule reports a failure, but it's part of a! the rule, this means - happening?  For example:

    / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Table Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 à 5.4pt 0 à 5.4pt ; mso-para-marge-top : 0 ; mso-para-marge-droit : 0 ; mso-para-marge-bas : 10.0pt ; mso-para-marge-left : 0 ; ligne-hauteur : 115 % ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-bidi-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-bidi-theme-font : minor-bidi ;}

    &(!pc_Windows_ehkeyctl|pc_XP_MCE_KB973768_MS09-037) (red indicates failure)

    The NAC is reported as a check failed:

    pc_Windows_ehkeyctl, File Check [$SYSTEM_ROOT\ehome\ehkeyctl.dll is]

    It is a failure because it finds the file and there is a negative on the rule?

    What about this:

    / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Table Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 à 5.4pt 0 à 5.4pt ; mso-para-marge-top : 0 ; mso-para-marge-droit : 0 ; mso-para-marge-bas : 10.0pt ; mso-para-marge-left : 0 ; ligne-hauteur : 115 % ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-bidi-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-bidi-theme-font : minor-bidi ;}

    &(!pc_XP_2115168_MS10-052_FileChk|pc_XP_2115168_MS10-052)

    The first part of the reports as passage, and the second reports failure... but logically, this part of the rule must pass because only after the first part?  Which apparently correct?

    Thank you!

    Gavin - Budd

    He actually reports a failure audit - and in many cases, it is expected (and confusing!).  For example, with Windows controls preconfigured, if it is a 32-bit client you will see fail the verification of 64-bit.

    Same with your second example check

    &(!pc_XP_2115168_MS10-052_FileChk|pc_XP_2115168_MS10-052)

    We expect that it is not the first cheque or spend the second control - but one of these controls will show as failed.  Clear as mud?

  • Break the password of ISE in a virtual environment.

    Hi all

    I forgot my password of my ISE. Infact, it is running in a Secure Network Server 3415.  This equipment has been installed by my colleague and he left the organization. Please help me and let me know how to break the password in ISE; that runs in a virtual environment.

    Please let me know if you need more information.

    Kind regards

    Shafi U

    ISE ISO can be downloaded at http://goo.gl/ECqB57

  • Cannot open the URL of the CWA with ISE

    Hi people,

    I have a problem when you perform the CWA with ISE so that I can give you access to the network for the guests.

    Everything is fine except the URL of the CWA: when guests, open Explorer and enter a domain name after you have connected the SSID, they will be redirected to the URL like 'https://hostname.demo.com:8443 / guestportal /... ". " which begins with the hostname of the ISE and the domain name of the ISE, but for us, we have not any announcement and the LAN DNS for our network so that we cannot translate the hostname.demo.com in the IP address of the ISE, so can I just change the URL type of intellectual property like"https://10.10.10.70:8443 / guestportal?

    Screenshot of an attached screenshot (sorry).

    Basically it's in the authorization policy, allows you to use a static DNS or IP address

  • Loops rule in the clouds of the OPA

    Hi OPA developers,.

    We currently use the OPA Cloud (may 2015) for the requirements on annual sales.  Unfortunately found an error of loop rule to requirements such as:

    * an e balance at beginning of the yearmust be equal to its previous year-end balance less pension his previous year of

    * but a balance end of year is equal to balance at the beginning of the year more value temp of the year

    The year is an entity.  Balance of year and end of year sale run loop in a debugger because even if we refer to the previous year, he always uses the same entity instance attribute.  Loop rule is not supported in the cloud (as opposed to how we can configure the properties of the rule in the version on site).

    Please let know us if you have a work around to do this.  The only alternative we have is to turn them into global attributes and enter the number of the year in the name, such as the balance of the year 2nd = 1st year sale - 1 year temp value, balance of 3 year = 2nd year balance - 2nd year temp value, etc.  But then, it is instances of entity year 100 x each attribute start and end loop so it will be a very large document/s for us to create and to business users to maintain.

    If all goes well there is something we can use entity and relationship functions... but always try to figure out how to do.  Any help is very appreciated!

    Thank you!

    Unfortunately there is no support for rule lines in the version of may 2015.  We are looking for by adding back to a later version.

    I'm guessing that your example is simplified, but you wrote it you don't need a loop of rule to solve.  The final value is just:

    InstanceSum (years, value temp of the year) - InstanceSum (the years, pension year of)

  • How to configure Enterprise Manager Database Control (MCCD) to make it work on 2 servers (primary and standby) work according to the rules of the DG

    Hello everyone I use Oracle Database EE 11.2.0.4 with DG.

    In these cases, I need to get Enterprise Manager Database Control running against DB with no CARS and no DG I do the following:

    I have SQLPLUS logon as user SYS or SYSTEM and drop the account sysman and business objects:

    DECLARE

    CURSOR c1 IS

    SELECT master, synonym_name name

    OF dba_synonyms

    WHERE table_owner = "SYSMAN";

    BEGIN

    TO r1 c1 LOOP

    IF r1.owner = "PUBLIC" THEN

    RUN IMMEDIATELY "DROP PUBLIC SYNONYM ' |" R1. Name;

    ON THE OTHER

    RUN IMMEDIATELY "DROP SYNONYM ' |" R1. Owner: '. ' || R1. Name;

    END IF;

    END LOOP;

    END;

    /

    Mgmt_view DROP USER CASCADE;

    /

    DROP ROLE mgmt_user;

    /

    Sysman DROP USER CASCADE;

    /

    After that, I run

    EMCA - config dbcontrol db-rest recreate

    But what do I do in case I have 2 servers (primary and standby) work according to the rules of the DG?

    Hello

    It is not possible to monitor and administer a basic physical or logical standby, IE using Enterprise Manager Database Control Data Guard.  This is mainly due to the fact that Database Control is designed to monitor the 1-database and an environment Data Guard, by definition, includes more than 1 database.

    If you attempt to run emca against a database of pending, you will get an error like (i.e. ORA-01219: database is not open).

    Of course, database Control, can be used to monitor the current main database (with no capacity to administer or control Data Guard related features).  In such a case, failover Database Control needs to be reconfigured to run on the new primary database using the commands described in detail in Note 278100.1 how to remove, create and recreate DB Control In A Database, section c. recreate/ReConfig DB control, Option 2 10 g. recreate the control DB Configuration files and repository.

    Enterprise Manager Grid Control or Cloud control provides the functionality for display, monitor, and administer the primary and standby databases in a Data Guard configuration.

    Reference: It is Possible to configure the database for a logical or physical Standby Database command? (Doc ID 315116.1)

    You can effectively use EM 12 c cloud control to monitor and manager ensures DB

    Ref to the link for more details below

    Set up and manage to Oracle Data Guard with Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud control 12 c

    Kind regards

    Rahul

  • How to exclude from the SOUL of the rules if the invoice distribution amount is &lt; 0 (i.e. the negative amount) to the existing rule

    How to exclude from the SOUL of the rules if the invoice distribution amount is < 0 (i.e. the negative amount) to the existing rule.

    Requirement: I have an obligation to send the invoice approval group approval specified when the invoice distribution account is 4567 and charge the amount of distribution > 0

    Finished configurations:

    1. Set condition: the string value to using 4567 supplier_invoice_distribution_gl_account attribute
    2. The condition set: SUPPLIER_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTION_AMOUNT is greater than or equal to 0
    3. Definition of new rule setting the terms of the 1st and 2nd stage and also group attached to this rule approval

    Note: Approval is not required is defined for invoices IN. matched in SOUL.

    Test case:

    1. Corresponding invoice with PO (PO amount is 8000)
    2. Amount of invoice header 5000
    3. Distribution account invoice 5568 as well as the amount is 8000
    4. Inserted 4567 distribution and quantity is - 3000

    Behavior of real: system sends the approval of the Bill for approval related group account 4567

    Expected behavior: invoice approval status should be 'Not necessary', since it is a corresponding purchase order invoice and 4567 account amount is < 0

    Kindly let me know how to set the rule to exclude the ve - amount distribution associated with lines

    Hello

    Then set a rule all 3 conditions:

    If attribute SUPPLIER_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTION_PO_MATCHED = No. and the SUPPLIER_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTION_AMOUNT attribute is less than the 0 attribute and supplier_invoice_distribution_account = <> then no permission.

    Concerning

    Yvette

  • How affect Dtx200 never participate in the rule of the load instead of doing in the sketch?

    I only know how to right click the Member that I wanted and click on modify member properties, then never changing the storage of data to share. But how to do it within the rules of charge? I also use essbase ASO.


    What I have in my .txt file. that is open in the loading rules that have columns.

    Member1

    Member2

    Member3

    What I did after having built the loading rules in the cube.

    Stored DataStorageTest # Default # (3)

    Member1 (+)

    Member2 (+)

    Member3 (+)

    What I want to achieve by using loading rules and not to do in the sketch

    Stored DataStorageTest # Default # (3)

    Member1 (+) (never share)

    Member2 (+) (never share)

    Member3 (+) (never share)

    Hello

    That's what I want to say my dear... The query answered in the mentioned thread. However, there are some codes that are used to set the properties in the rules of the load. The value of a column the file generation of dimension with the code that you want to use and tag the column as a property in the State of charge.

    For example, use N never share.

    Code Description
    % Expressed as a percentage of the total current in consolidation
    * Multiply by the total current in consolidation
    + Add the total current in consolidation
    - Deducted from the current sum in consolidation
    / Divide by the total current in consolidation
    ~ Exclude the consolidation
    ^ Exclude all Essbase - Consolidations / aggregations in all dimensions
    A Treat it as an element of balance of medium time (applies to dimensions only accounts)
    B Exclude data values of zero or #MISSING in the rest of the time (applies to size accounts only)
    E Treat it as an element of expenditure (applies to dimensions only accounts)
    F Treat as a first element of balance time (applies to dimensions only accounts)
    L Treat as a last element of balance time (applies to dimensions only accounts)
    M Exclude the data values of #MI or #MISSING of the balance of time (applies to dimensions only accounts)
    N Never allow the sharing of data
    O Tag as Essbase - Label only (store no data)
    S Member of the stored membership (non - dynamic Calc and not the label only)
    T Require an Essbase - calculations of re-encoding (applies to dimensions only accounts)
    V Create like Essbase - dynamics and store calculations
    X Create like Essbase - dynamic calculations
    Z Exclude given values of zero on the balance of time (applies to dimensions only accounts)

    Hope this helps,

    Kind regards

    Amit Khanna

  • How to make consolidation operator (~) instead of (+) by placing it in the rules of the load.

    Because by default it will make my child (+) values after build in the cube. I don't want one by one change the operator of consolidation in the values of the child to (~) in the outline. It must therefore be made in the rules of the load. For your information, for my build parameter dimension, I have defined this reference generation and in the dimension of the generation properties, I put as a generation like the field and field number 2. I can't find the setting to make all my child operator of consolidation so that it takes (~) in the rules of the load. Thank you

    What I have in my .txt file. that is open in the loading rules that have columns.

    Value1

    Value2

    Value3

    What I did after having built the loading rules in the cube.

    Stored MyDimensionName # Default # (3)

    Value1 (+)

    Value2 (+)

    Value3 (+)

    What I want to achieve.

    Stored MyDimensionName # Default # (3)

    Value1 (~)

    Value2 (~)

    Value3 (~)

    Hello, I did it before I saw your reply. I add a first column to help to create a field using text, and I type in ~. So total I now have two columns

    Field1 Field2

    Value1 ~.

    Value2 ~.

    Value3 ~.

    After that, for my dimension build setting, I put it as a reference of generation. In the generation of dimension properties, I put it Field1 as generation for the field and field2 as a property for the field. I have set as number2 Field1 and field2 as number2. I need to change my stored MyDimensionName # Default # (3) stored MyDimensionName # Default # (3) (Label only) If no, it will not work. That's how I did it. Haven yet tried your method. That means that u create using a field using text that is gen1 for column1, and ~ to Column3? In total it is therefore 3 columns?

  • Script to display the VM who do not respect the rules of the DRS

    Hello

    I'm looking for Powercli script to get some information from DRS rules:

    I explain the details of the bellows of the application

    I have 2 DRS rules:

    The first rule (R1) run several VMS on ESX Details. The ESX name starts with SRV1xxxx... The virtual machine are on data warehouses whose name starts with DTX1_...

    The second rule (R2) run several VMS on ESX Details. The name of ESX starts with SRV2xxxx. The virtual machine are on data warehouses whose name starts with DTY2_...

    For 2 rules above, I need to be sure that VM running on the datastore DTX1, are on servers ESX, named SRV1xxx, then VM that are running on the DTY2 data store, are on the ESX servers named SRV2xxx

    Summary:

    Rule 1: List of virtual machine that runs on DTX1 and SRV1xxxx

    Rule 2: List of virtual machine that is running on DTY2 and SRV2xxxx

    The script should check and view the virtual machines that do not respect the rules. For example, if a virtual computer runs DTX1 and SRV2xxx, or a virtual computer runs on DTX2 and SRV1xxx, I need to put the name of the virtual machines in an excel file and send the result by mail.

    Thanks for your help.

    Kind regards

    Try this variation

    Get - VM |

    Select Name,

    @{N = "Datastore"; E={$_. ExtensionData.Config.Files.VmPathName.Split(']') [0]. "Split('[') [1]}},"

    @{N = "Iddm"; E={$_. ExtensionData.Config.Files.VmPathName.Split(']') [0]. Split('[') [1] - match ' \D+(? \d+)\D+' |) Out-Null; $matches ['number']}},

    @{N = 'ESXi'; E={$_. VMHost.Name}},

    @{N = "ESXid"; E={$_. VMHost.Name.Split('.') [0] - match ' \D+(? \d+)\D+' |) Out-Null; $matches ['number']}} |

    where {$_.} Iddm - not $_. ESXid} |

    Select the name of the data store, ESXi

  • rule of the VM host affinity Vcloud managed cluster.

    Hi all

    I have an automated DRS Cluster in which we want to create a vm host affinity rule. This cluster is added to Vcloud Director. Can we create a rule of VM host affinity on the cluster added to the Vcloud directory?

    Kind regards

    Vikram kumar.

    There is nothing you can do that.  But they only persist as long as this specific VM exists.  for example if you copy this catalogue, the resulting virtual machine will not have the same affinity rule.

    So yes it is possible, but it may be best to use some sort of automation to perform the task for 'remember' If you happen to have more than 1-2.

    I know that people have done that to save on license of operating system/Application fees.  The only downside to know is that pass by the maintenance mode could violate the rule of the DRS.

Maybe you are looking for