RV180 rules of access and NAT
OK, I have a RV180 that I'm going to have some problems with access rules and one to one NAT.
What I have is very basic with regard to needs. Outgoing Internet flows very well.
I have an FTP server that does not use the WAN interface for the public IP address, so I created a One to One private NAT range Begin 192.168.8.28 for the inside address. I then enter the public IP 1.1.1.1 set the length of the range to 1 and the FTP service (also tried everything) and then saved.
In my access rules I created and rule of incoming traffic always allow ANY for FTP
192.168.8.28 is sent to the Server Local (DNAT IP)
Use another WAN IP address is active and set to 1.1.1.1 and the rule is enabled
No joy in the FTP connection and I don't see anything in the papers, showing the blocked port. What I'm missing here?
After you configure a rule one by one, the outbound traffic is allowed by default and incoming traffic is allowed by the services defined in the one-to-one NAT rule.
Tags: Cisco Support
Similar Questions
-
RV180 need some advice/Suggestion regarding the rules of access and Services
Hi, I expected to get some advice or suggestion with a RV180 question. I have a cable modem connection that connects to my port WAN RV180 and we have a single static IP address on the WAN port and everything works great. We have an internal Exchange Server, so we have a few inbound rules access allowing for ports 443 and 25. It all works.
This is the question that I encounter. We have now another service internal now needs outside inside access on port 443 (https), but I already have this configuration on the router for Exchange and when I have both sense, of course, it won't work correctly because the router just takes the first rules of access and use the one that works very well for traffic Exchange , but not my other service.
Is there another way to get this job where I can have two internal services on port 443 and the router can forward traffic appropriate to each of them since my first IP? (it doesn't really matter if I had two IP addresses because it always hits the same access list for internal services)
All advice or suggestion would be great
Hi, yours is a general networking, not specific to RV180 problem.
As you have only one IP public (on the WAN port), you only have a single port 443, you can support two services outside-to-inside.
The cheapest solution is one of the services to another port, if the service permits.
The most expensive solution is to have public IP addresses.
-
Remote access ASA, VPN and NAT
Hello
I try to get access to remote VPN work using a Cisco VPN client and ASA with no split tunneling. The VPN works a little, I can access devices inside when I connect, but I can't access the Internet. I don't see any errors in the log ASA except these:
1 Jul 04:59:15 % ASA-3-305006 gatekeeper: failed to create translation portmap for udp src outside:192.168.47.200/137 dst outside:192.168.47.255/137
1 Jul 04:59:15 % ASA-3-305006 gatekeeper: failed to create translation portmap for udp src outside:192.168.47.200/54918 dst outsidexx.xxx.xxx.xxx/53There is only one address public IP that is assigned to the external interface of DHCP. The Interior is 192.168.1.0/24 network which is PAT'ed to the external interface and the VPN network is 192.168.47.X.
I think my problem is that the net.47 is not NAT'ed out properly and I don't know how to put in place exactly. I can't understand how this is supposed to work since the net VPN technically provenance from the outside already.
Here are all the relevant config:
list of vpn access extended permits all ip 192.168.47.0 255.255.255.0
Within 1500 MTU
Outside 1500 MTU
IP local pool vpnpool 192.168.47.200 - 192.168.47.220 mask 255.255.255.0
IP verify reverse path to the outside interface
IP audit info alarm drop action
IP audit attack alarm drop action
ICMP unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
ICMP allow all outside
Global interface (2 inside)
Global 1 interface (outside)
NAT (inside) 0-list of access vpn
NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
NAT (outside) 2 192.168.47.0 255.255.255.0 outside
static (inside, outside) tcp 3074 XBOX360 3074 netmask 255.255.255.255 interface
static (inside, outside) udp 3074 XBOX360 3074 netmask 255.255.255.255 interface
public static (inside, outside) udp interface 88 88 XBOX360 netmask 255.255.255.255
public static tcp (indoor, outdoor) https someids netmask 255.255.255.255 https interfaceI can post more of the configuration if necessary.
Change ' nat (outside) 2 192.168.47.0 255.255.255.0 apart ' "NAT (2-list of vpn access outdoors outside)" gives these:
1 Jul 06:18:35 % gatekeeper ASA-3-305005: no group of translation not found for udp src outside:192.168.47.200/56003 dst outside:66.174.95.44/53
So, how I do right NAT VPN traffic so it can access the Internet?
A few things that needs to be changed:
(1) NAT exemption what ACL must be modified to be more specific while the traffic between the internal subnets and subnet pool vpn is not coordinated. NAT exemption takes precedence over all other statements of NAT, so your internet traffic from the vpn does not work.
This ACL:
list of vpn access extended permits all ip 192.168.47.0 255.255.255.0
Should be changed to:
extensive list of access vpn ip 192.168.47.0 255.255.255.0 allow
(2) you don't need statement "overall (inside) 2. Here's what to be configured:
no nat (outside) 2 192.168.47.0 255.255.255.0 outside
no global interface (2 inside)
NAT (outside) 1 192.168.47.0 255.255.255.0
(3) and finally, you must activate the following allow traffic back on the external interface:
permit same-security-traffic intra-interface
And don't forget to clear xlate after the changes described above and connect to your VPN.
Hope that helps.
-
Rule static versus Globan1 &; NAT rule
Hello
If I have a combination of static address translation and a global address translation & nat at the same public ip address, which rule takes precedence. Global or static & NAT.
It is a purely academic question.
Thanks in advance.
Concerning
CP
Hello
Static takes precedence, then nat0 with access-list and nat/global, then then nat0
Thank you
Nadeem
-
Firepower does not work when using the Active Directory group as a rule filter access control
I am PoV of Cisco ASA with the power of fire with my client. I would like to integrate the power of fire to MS Active Directory. Everything seems to work properly.
-Fire power user agent installation to complete successfully. Connection to AD work fine. The newspaper is GREEN.
-J' created a Kingdom in FireSight and you can download users and groups from Active Directory.
-J' created a politics of identity with passive authentication (using the field I created)
-Can I use the AD account "user" as a filter in access control rule and it work very well.
However, if I create the rule of access control with AD Group', the rule never get match. I'm sure that the user that I test is a member of the group. Connection event show the system to ignore this rule and the traffic is blocked by the default action below. It doesn't look like the firepower doesn't know that the user belongs to the group.
I use
-User agent firepower for Active Directory v2.3 build 10.
-ASA 5515 software Version 9.5 (2)
-Fire version 6.0.0 - 1005 power module
-Firepower for VMWare Management Center
Any suggestion would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Hello
You should check the download user under domain option. Download the users once belonging to a group is specified on the ad and then test the connection.
Thank you
Yogesh
-
ACS, Service access and authorization
I'm under ACS 5.2 and I'm trying to set up 3 new SSID, which 2 are not guaranteed and 1 which is secure. I'm trying to understand the best way to allow their evolution on which network they come. All authentication requests are from the same devices, LAN controllers without wire, so NDG cannot be used as criteria. I was watching either create 3 Access Services and using selection rules, or by creating 1 Service access and using permission to choose. However, I can't find an attribute to use for determining what network they came.
Anyone has a suggestion for the best way to do it? I have
Go to the elements of the policy-> Conditions of network-> end of Station filters and create a rule CLI/DNIS that includes the name of the SSID, and then use it as a condition to any rule you create for authentication. The SSID will be preceded by MAC address, then enter * ssidname (i.e., match whatever it is before the name SSID, then match the SSID). For example, if the SSID is called lab, then you must enter * lab.
Then go to access-> Service selection policies and create a service selection rule that has end Station filter as a criterion.
-
client ipSec VPN and NAT on the router Cisco = FAIL
I have a Cisco 3825 router that I have set up for a Cisco VPN ipSec client. The same router is NAT.
ipSec logs, but can not reach the internal network unless NAT is disabled on the inside interface. But I need both at the same time.
Suggestions?
crypto ISAKMP policy 3
BA 3des
preshared authentication
Group 2
!
ISAKMP crypto client configuration group myclient
key password!
DNS 1.1.1.1
Domain name
pool myVPN
ACL 111
!
!
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac RIGHT
!
Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10
Set transform-set RIGHT
market arriere-route
!
!
list of card crypto clientmap client VPN - AAA authentication
card crypto clientmap AAA - VPN isakmp authorization list
client configuration address map clientmap crypto answer
10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map clientmap Dynamics dynmap
!interface Loopback0
IP 10.88.0.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
/ / DESC it's external interfaceIP 192.168.168.5 255.255.255.0
NAT outside IP
IP virtual-reassembly
automatic duplex
automatic speed
media type rj45
clientmap card crypto
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/1/ / DESC it comes from inside interface
10.0.1.10 IP address 255.255.255.0
IP nat inside<=================ipSec client="" connects,="" but="" cannot="" reach="" interior="" network="" unless="" this="" is="">=================ipSec>
IP virtual-reassembly
the route cache same-interface IP
automatic duplex
automatic speed
media type rj45!
IP local pool myVPN 10.88.0.2 10.88.0.10
p route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.168.1
IP route 10.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.0.1.4
!IP nat inside source list 1 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload
!
access-list 1 permit 10.0.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 111 allow ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.255.255 10.88.0.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 111 allow ip 10.88.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.0.255.255Hello
I think that you need to configure the ACL default PAT so there first statemts 'decline' for traffic that is NOT supposed to be coordinated between the local network and VPN pool
For example, to do this kind of configuration, ACL and NAT
Note access-list 100 NAT0 customer VPN
access-list 100 deny ip 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.88.0.0 0.0.0.255
Note access-list 100 default PAT for Internet traffic
access-list 100 permit ip 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255 ay
overload of IP nat inside source list 100 interface GigabitEthernet0/0
EDIT: seem to actually you could have more than 10 networks behind the routerThen you could modify the ACL on this
Note access-list 100 NAT0 customer VPN
access-list 100 deny ip 10.0.1.0 0.0.255.255 10.88.0.0 0.0.0.255
Note access-list 100 default PAT for Internet traffic
access-list 100 permit ip 10.0.1.0 0.0.255.255 ay
Don't forget to mark the answers correct/replys and/or useful answers to rate
-Jouni
-
Cisco ASA Site to Site VPN IPSEC and NAT question
Hi people,
I have a question about the two Site to Site VPN IPSEC and NAT. basically what I want to achieve is to do the following:
ASA2 is at HQ and ASA1 is a remote site. I have no problem setting a static static is a Site to IPSEC VPN between sites. Guests residing in 10.1.0.0/16 are able to communicate with hosts in 192.168.1.0/24, but what I want is to configure the NAT with IPSEC VPN for this host to 10.1.0.0/16 will communicate with hosts in 192.168.1.0/24 with translated addresses
Just an example:
N2 host (10.1.0.1/16) contacted N1 192.168.1.5 with destination host say 10.23.1.5 No 192.168.1.5 (notice the last byte is the same in the present case,.5)
The translation still for the rest of the communication (host pings ip destination host 10.23.1.6 N3 N2 not 192.168.1.6 new last byte is the same)
It sounds a bit confusing to me, but I've seen this type of configuration before when I worked for the supplier of managed services where we have given our customers (Ipsec Site to Site VPN with NAT, don't know how it was setup)
Basically we contact the customer via site-to-site VPN hosts but their real address were hidden and we used as translated address more high 10.23.1.0/24 instead of (real) 192.168.1.0/24, last byte must be the same.
Grateful if someone can shed some light on this subject.
Hello
OK so went with the old format of NAT configuration
It seems to me that you could do the following:
- Configure the ASA1 with static NAT strategy
- access-list L2LVPN-POLICYNAT allowed ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0
- public static 10.23.1.0 (inside, outside) access-list L2LVPN-POLICYNAT
- Because the above is a static NAT of the policy, this means that the translation will be made only when the destination network is 10.1.0.0/16
- If you have for example a PAT basic configuration to inside-> external traffic, the above NAT configuration and the custom of the actual configuration of PAT interfere with eachother
- ASA2 side, you can normally configure NAT0 / NAT Exemption for the 10.1.0.0/16 network
- Note of the INTERIOR-SHEEP access-list SHEEP L2LVPN
- the permitted INSIDE SHEEP 10.1.0.0 ip access list 255.255.0.0 10.23.1.0 255.255.255.0
- NAT (inside) 0-list of access to the INTERIOR-SHEEP
- You will need to consider that your access-list defining the VPN encrypted L2L traffic must reflect the new NAT network
- ASA1: allowed to access-list L2LVPN-ENCRYPTIONDOMAIN ip 10.23.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0
- ASA2: list L2LVPN-ENCRYPTIONDOMAIN allowed ip 10.1.0.0 access 255.255.0.0 10.23.1.0 255.255.255.0
I could test this configuration to work tomorrow but I would like to know if it works.
Please rate if this was helpful
-Jouni
- Configure the ASA1 with static NAT strategy
-
Access and download FTP on VPN problem
Ok
Here's my situation, we connect to Cisco ASA 5505 on IPSEC VPN cisco forwards the request to our router Juniper. What we do on the VPN works exept FTP #1
Here I am the Cisco config (with personal information removed).
problem in society is the IP addressing as been IMO butched
We have 6 guests
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
Since most routers use 0,0 1,0 or 2,0 most of our clients cannot connect to the VPN, then my boss set up our Juniper to translate the IP address
So make us 202,0 access 2.0
Example if to access a server in 192.168.2.220 in RDP that write us in windows RDP 192.168.202.220 and converts of Juniper data 2,220 and everything works fine
EXCEPT FTP.
The FTP server is 192.168.2.19
So if I write in IE or Firefox (ps file zilla does not work)
FTP://192.168.2.19 I get the list of files. but when I click on a folder or file, I get a time-out error.
so that if I do ftp://192.168.202.19 I don't even no initial registration.
If I look in the Juniper I can see data entry
So the problem seems to be coming back from the Juniper or cisco.
The FTP server is also part 3, so when I called the company to see if it is active or passive. They said that it is both.
I guess that the problem comes from the Juniper but still take a chance
ASA Version 8.2 (1)
!
Terminal width 250
router host name
activate the encrypted password
encrypted passwd
names of
!
interface Vlan1
nameif inside
security-level 100
IP 192.168.192.2 255.255.255.252
!
interface Vlan2
nameif outside
security-level 0
IP x.x.x.x 255.255.255.248
!
interface Ethernet0/0
switchport access vlan 2
!
interface Ethernet0/1
!
interface Ethernet0/2
!
interface Ethernet0/3
!
interface Ethernet0/4
!
interface Ethernet0/5
!
interface Ethernet0/6
!
interface Ethernet0/7
!
passive FTP mode
grp_outside_in tcp service object-group
Description Ports require for internal transfer
EQ smtp port object
EQ port ssh object
access list inside-out extended ip allowed any one
access list inside-out extended permit icmp any one
permit no_nat to access extended list ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0
list access tunnel extended split ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 allow 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0
access-list 101 extended allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.201.0 255.255.255.0
access-list 101 extended allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 host 192.168.202.19
access-list 102 extended allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.202.0 255.255.255.0
access-list 102 extended allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0
access-list 103 extended allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 host 192.168.202.19
access-list 103 extended allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.203.0 255.255.255.0
104 extended access-list allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.204.0 255.255.255.0
104 extended access-list allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 host 192.168.202.19
105 extended access-list allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 host 192.168.202.19
105 extended access-list allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.205.0 255.255.255.0
106 extended access-list allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.206.0 255.255.255.0
106 extended access-list allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.202.0 255.255.255.0
114 extended access-list allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.214.0 255.255.255.0
114 extended access-list allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.201.0 255.255.255.0
114 extended access-list allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.202.0 255.255.255.0
114 extended access-list allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.203.0 255.255.255.0
114 extended access-list allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.204.0 255.255.255.0
114 extended access-list allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.205.0 255.255.255.0
114 extended access-list allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.206.0 255.255.255.0
access-list 200 scopes allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.203.0 255.255.255.0
access-list 200 scopes allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.204.0 255.255.255.0
access-list 200 scopes allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.205.0 255.255.255.0
access-list 200 scope allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 host 192.168.202.19
400 extended access-list allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.201.0 255.255.255.0
400 extended access-list allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.202.0 255.255.255.0
400 extended access-list allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.203.0 255.255.255.0
400 extended access-list allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.204.0 255.255.255.0
400 extended access-list allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.205.0 255.255.255.0
400 extended access-list allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.206.0 255.255.255.0
400 extended access-list allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.214.0 255.255.255.0
access-list 201 extended allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.201.0 255.255.255.0
access-list 201 extended allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.202.0 255.255.255.0
access-list 201 extended allow ip 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.206.0 255.255.255.0
extended access-list of 500 permit tcp 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.202.0 255.255.255.0 eq ftp
extended access-list of 500 permit tcp 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.202.0 255.255.255.0 eq ftp - data
extended access-list of 500 permit tcp 10.250.128.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.202.0 255.255.255.0 gt 1024pager lines 34
Enable logging
timestamp of the record
debug logging in buffered memory
recording of debug trap
asdm of logging of information
Within 1500 MTU
Outside 1500 MTU
IP local pool mobilepool 10.250.128.100 - 10.250.128.130 mask 255.255.255.0
ICMP unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
ASDM image disk0: / asdm - 621.bin
don't allow no asdm history
ARP timeout 14400
Global 1 interface (outside)
NAT (inside) 0-list of access no_nat
NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.x.x.x 1
Route inside 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.192.1 1
Route inside 192.168.201.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.192.1 1
Route inside 192.168.202.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.192.1 1
Route inside 192.168.203.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.192.1 1
Route inside 192.168.204.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.192.1 1
Route inside 192.168.205.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.192.1 1
Route inside 192.168.206.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.192.1 1
Route inside 192.168.214.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.192.1 1
Timeout xlate 03:00
Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
Sunrpc timeout 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 mgcp from 01:00 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
Sip timeout 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 prompt Protocol sip-0: 03:00 sip - disconnect 0:02:00
Timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
dynamic-access-policy-registration DfltAccessPolicy
the ssh LOCAL console AAA authentication
Enable http server
http 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 inside
No snmp server location
No snmp Server contact
Server enable SNMP traps snmp authentication linkup, linkdown cold start
Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac floating
life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800
Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association
Crypto-map dynamic dyn1 1 set transform-set floating
Crypto-map dynamic dyn1 1jeu reverse-road
mobilemap 1 card crypto ipsec-isakmp dynamic dyn1
mobilemap interface card crypto outside
crypto ISAKMP allow outside
crypto ISAKMP policy 1
preshared authentication
3des encryption
sha hash
Group 2
life 86400
Telnet timeout 5
SSH 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 inside
SSH 192.168.192.0 255.255.224.0 inside
SSH 10.0.128.0 255.255.255.0 inside
SSH timeout 5
SSH version 2
Console timeout 0
dhcpd outside auto_config
!a basic threat threat detection
Statistics-list of access threat detection
no statistical threat detection tcp-interception
WebVPN
internal mobilegroup group policy
internal mobile_policy group policy
attributes of the strategy of group mobile_policy
Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
Split-tunnel-network-list value split tunnel(User with the access restrictions section list)
type tunnel-group mobilegroup remote access
tunnel-group mobilegroup General-attributes
address mobilepool pool
Group Policy - by default-mobile_policy
mobilegroup group of tunnel ipsec-attributes
pre-shared key
!
Global class-card class
match default-inspection-traffic
inspection of the class-map
class-map inspection_default
match default-inspection-traffic
!
!
type of policy-card inspect dns preset_dns_map
parameters
message-length maximum 512
Policy-map global_policy
class inspection_default
inspect the preset_dns_map dns
inspect the ftp
inspect h323 h225
inspect the h323 ras
inspect the rsh
inspect the rtsp
inspect esmtp
inspect sqlnet
inspect the skinny
inspect sunrpc
inspect xdmcp
inspect the sip
inspect the netbios
inspect the tftp
!
global service-policy global_policy
context of prompt hostname
Cryptochecksum:4d936450878b9803a1fdde1c7f0fd807
: endI saw Application Layer Gateway (ALG of Juniper) give a problem with the FTP flow. Check to see if it is activated and flip on (or off) and try again your ftp.
ScreenOS 6 + (Netscreen firewall), the command is 'get alg '. For ScreenOS 5.4 or lower is a hidden command ' get the registry nat vector | I FTP ".
For the Juno (SRX Firewall) is to "see the alg decision."
-
VPN IPSec with no. - Nat and Nat - No.
On a 6.3 (5) PIX 515 that I currently have an IPSec VPN configured with no. - nat, using all public IPs internally and on the remote control. Can I add two hosts to the field of encryption that have private IP addresses and NAT to the same public IP in the address card Crypto? What commands would be involved in this?
Current config:
-------
ipsectraffic_boston list of allowed access host ip host PublicIP11 PublicIP1
ipsectraffic_boston list of allowed access host ip host PublicIP22 PublicIP2
outside2_outbound_nat0_acl list of allowed access host ip host PublicIP PublicIP
card crypto mymap 305 correspondence address ipsectraffic_boston
mymap 305 peer IPAdd crypto card game.
mymap 305 transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA crypto card game
life card crypto mymap 305 set security-association seconds 86400 4608000 kilobytes---------
I would add two IP private to the 'ipsectraffic_boston access-list' and have NAT to a public IP address, as the remote site asks that I don't use the private IP. This would save the effort to add a public IP address to my internal host.
Thank you
Dan
Hello
If for example you have an internal host 192.168.1.1 and you want NAT public IP 200.1.1.1 it address
You can make a static NAT:
(in, out) static 200.1.1.1 192.168.1.1
And include the 200.1.1.1 in crypto ACL.
Federico.
-
My iPhone 6 s + has been stolen. I got the code to access and iCloud, and I putted in find my iPhone. Here illegally, could unlock iPhone and log in icloud. I only had reference no.. MKV82LL/A, Series n F2 * RWV on the packaging. I wonder how do I get it back?
< personal information under the direction of the host >
Hello Miss116,
I am so sorry your iPhone was stolen, it's a terrible feeling, and I'm here to help you with everything I can.
1. go to a computer and go to iCloud.com and sign in with your Apple ID and password.
2. go find iPhone and all devices at the top, click on your iPhone.
3. click on lost Mode and put in a phone number where you can be reached.
4. click Next, then enter a message that says something along the lines, "Please find my iPhone, please call this number to return."
5. click on done
Best wishes to get your iPhone back safely.
-
The appleid on my iphone is an old email address that I no longer have access and for which I don't remember the password. My ID apple implemented through my pc is my new e-mail address. How can I change the application on my iphone to match my new email address
Here is the procedure to change the Apple ID:
Change your Apple - Apple Support ID
If bad comes to worse, use the link below to contact the Apple Support.
-
How to access and recover photos and data from icloud?
How to access and recover photos and data from icloud?
Sign up for settings/iCloud and turn on the various switches in sync. On a computer, go to system/iCloud Preferences, log in and check the different items to synchronize.
-
When I go online on Skype, my internet will with limited access, and I'll offiline
When I go online on Skype, my internet will with limited access, and I'll offiline
Hello
1. which version of Skype is currently installed on the computer?
2 is this problem limited only when using Skype?
3. what type of Internet connection you have (cable modem, DSL, or something else)?
4 when it disconnects what do I you end up doing for her return to the connection?
5. What is the exact error you get that tells you that the device is disconnected?
6. what version of operating system you are using on the computer?Method 1:
I suggest you run the network troubleshooter to check if it helps.Troubleshooting network in Windows 7 using:
http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/using-the-network-troubleshooter-in-Windows-7
You can provide the network store event logs.Method 2:
You can update the latest drivers of NIC manufacturers.Windows 7: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/Update-a-driver-for-hardware-that-isn ' t-work properly
Windows Vista: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows-vista/Update-a-driver-for-hardware-that-isn ' t-work properly
The question you have posted is related to Skype and would be better suited to the Skype forum community. Please visit the link below to find a community that will provide the best support.
http://Forum.Skype.com/ -
I created this account so that I can post this question on my real account associated with xbox live gamertag "kookamango" that is blocked.
So far, I've dealt with xbox live support, which all have confirmed that this problem is not solvable on their end. My last support Xbox Live call reference number is 1160762648My account has unauthorized access and fraudulent charges have been made. The situation has been studied, and my money was refunded to me. The number of service request for the investigation of fraud was 1160762648. My account has been blocked in the investigation and is still blocked even if the investigation is completed and I was sent my email account recovery. Despite the reset my password several times and multiple recovery emails, I couldn't again access to my account, because he always goes to a window saying: "your account has been temporarily blocked."Please unblock my account windowsliveHello
By facing the problem with Windows live account, it would be better to post the same question in the Windows Live Solution Center for assistance.
Windows Live Solution Center: http://windowslivehelp.com/product.aspx?productid=10
For more information, see the following articles:
http://support.Xbox.com/en-us/Xbox-Live/how-to/Xbox-Live-account-management/home
http://support.Xbox.com/en-us/Xbox-Live/how-to/Xbox-Live-account-management/manage-Live-ID
Hope the information is useful.
Maybe you are looking for
-
TDMS open - file format version
Fortunately it is a simple question... What is the difference between the version of the file format 1.0 and 2.0 in the PDM open vi and how will this affect my TDMS file?
-
I tried to update (KB968816), but it failed. I have a Vista 32 bit and I would also like to know how to delete a backup that I did? I think that I have backed up theall the computer and does know how to backup some files and now I have a Windows.old
-
I can't open my file of fire wall
I tried to run micosolf fix it, I, v tried to restore, my comp. Ihave ran check disk and repair program nothing worked
-
Whenever I try to run the game, Skyrim or the Skyrim error creation Kit "the point procedure entry D3DKMTOpenSyncObjectFromNtHandle be found in GDI32.dll dynamic link library" but I have this dll in my Windows/system folder and in my folder Kit creat
-
AJAX troubles after the Beta 3
Hello I recently installed the Beta 3 SDK. After which, the widget that I built under Beta 2 stops working. After that some digging, it seems that the piece that broke is the Ajax requests. The error: The answer comes back with an error 500 and a res