SEVERAL CRYPTO CARD

Similar Questions

• VTI and crypto card

  Hello

  I wonder if it is possible to have a configuration in IPSEC tunnel, in which one side of the tunnel is configured with static VTI and the traditional second with crypto-map.

  If so, how the configuration on the crypto-Map site should be configured.

  Thank you in advance for an answer.

  Concerning

  Lukas

  Lukasz,

  This config is impractical for several reasons.

  VTI dictates that a "any any" proxy set ID is negotiated. While this works well on a virtual interface, where routing can push traffic to a specific interface, it will make ALL traffic is encrypted on crypto maps side and expect all traffic is encrypted when it is recived (because crypto card is part of ECAS in the Lane exit).

  A more practical approach in the world of Cisco is multi SA DVTI, where a DVTI can put end to any kind of insider tunnel (i.e. allow us DVTI to manage several SAs under a virtual interface) it works very well in some cases.

  You can have DVTI on your end and allow the clients to use almost anything (from ASIT cryptographic maps).
  I'll shoot you as an email at the same time, a bit stuck on something at the moment.

  M.

• Site to Site VPN working without Crypto Card (ASA 8.2 (1))

  Hi all

  Find a strange situation on our firewall to ASA5540:

  We have a few Site to Site VPN and also activate on the ASA VPN cleint, all are working properly. But finding that a VPN from Site to Site is running without crypto map configuration. Is this possible?

  I tried to erase isa his and claire ipsec his then VPN came once again. Tested too, it's the ping requests to a remote site through the VPN.

  I saw there are config tunnel-group for VPN but saw no card crypto and ACL.

  How is the firewall knows what traffic should be encrypted for this VPN tunnel without crypto card?

  This is the bug?

  Thanks in advance,

  It can be an easy vpn configuration.

  Could you post output config operation remove any sensitive information.  This could help us answer your question more specifically.

• 'Crypto card' to the in-house/internal interface. Possible?

  Hi, I have a two routers on a VPN to a point where the 'Crypto Map' statement is attributed to external as usual. It works fine but I need each router to a different IP address to the external interface.

  For example:

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  life 3600

  privatekey key address 4.4.4.4 crypto ISAKMP xauth No.

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac 3des

  !

  crypto map 1 VPN ipsec-isakmp

  defined peer 4.4.4.4

  Set transform-set 3des

  match the vpn address

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/0

  IP 4.4.4.4 255.255.255.252

  NAT outside IP

  IP virtual-reassembly

  10 speed

  full-duplex

  No cdp enable

  VPN crypto card

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/1

  IP 8.8.8.8 255.255.255.248

  IP nat inside

  IP virtual-reassembly

  automatic duplex

  automatic speed

  Instead of the "4.4.4.4" presented to the other side of the VPN, I need the 8.8.8.8 will be presented. I tried to change just the Crypto statements like below, but she always presents the 4.4.4.4 probably because of the interface that the Crypto map is applied

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  life 3600

  privatekey key address 8.8.8.8 crypto ISAKMP xauth No.

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac 3des

  !

  crypto map 1 VPN ipsec-isakmp

  defined peer 8.8.8.8

  Set transform-set 3des

  match the vpn address

  How can I make sure that 8.8.8.8 is what is presented on the other side?

  Thank you

  Andy

  Hi Andy,.

  I suggest the following command:

  card crypto-address

  http://Tools.Cisco.com/Squish/9c85B
  

  To specify and name an interface identify to be used by the encryption for IPSec traffic card, use the card crypto - local address in global configuration mode command. To remove this command from the configuration, don't use No form of this command.

  card crypto map-name - address interface id

  no card crypto name of the map address

  Example:

  interface loopback0

  IP 4.2.2.2 255.255.255.252

  !

  mymap-address loopback0 crypto card

  !

  S0 interface

  crypto mymap map

  !

  Of course, you need to make sure that the remote end can reach this additional IP address.

  Let me know if you have any questions.

  Please note any workstation that will be useful.

• Multiple Crypto cards on simple external Interface

  Hi, I got the following encryption card configured on my ASA5505 to allow Cisco IPSec VPN clients to connect from the outside:

  crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 pfs Group1 set

  Crypto dynamic-map SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP 65535 value transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA ESP-AES-128-MD5 ESP-AES-192-SHA ESP-AES-192-MD5 ESP-AES-256-SHA ESP-AES-256-MD5 ESP-3DES-SHA MD5-ESP-3DES ESP-DES-SHA ESP-DES-MD5

  outside_map card crypto 65535-isakmp dynamic ipsec SYSTEM_DEFAULT_CRYPTO_MAP

  outside_map interface card crypto outside

  I'm now trying to set up a map of additional encryption - a static configuration to establish a tunnel with Windows Azure services. The configuration, they gave me is:

  Crypto map Azur-crypto-map 10 correspondence address azure-vpn-acl

  crypto azure-crypto-card card game 10 peers XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX (hidden)
  

  card crypto azure-crypto-map 10 set transform-set of Azur-ipsec-proposal-set

  Azur-crypto-card interface card crypto outside

  However, when I apply this configuration, my Cisco IPSec clients can connect is no longer. I think that my problem is that last line:

  Azur-crypto-card interface card crypto outside

  that blows away my original line:

  outside_map interface card crypto outside

  It seems that I'm stuck with just picking one of the maps to apply to the external interface. Is there a way to apply both of these cards to the external interface to allow the two IPSec tunnels to create? We lack ASA version 8.4 (7) 3.

  Hello

  You can use the same "crypto map"

  Just add

  card crypto outside_map 10 correspondence address azure-vpn-acl

  crypto outside_map 10 card game peers XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX (hidden)
  

  card crypto outside_map 10 set transform-set of Azur-ipsec-proposal-set

  Your dynamic VPN Clients will continue to work very well that their statements "crypto map" are in the order of precedence / low in "crypto map" configurations (65535) and VPN L2L is higher (10)

  And I want to say with the above is that, where a connection VPN L2L is formed from the remote end it will be naturally VPN L2L configurations you have with the number of configurations "crypto map" '10'. Then when a VPN Client connects it naturally will not match the specific configurations of the number "10" and will move to the next entry and the match (65535)

  If you happen to set up a new connection VPN L2L then you might give him the number "11" for example and it would still be fine.

  Hope this helps

  -Jouni

• The upgrade of several graphics cards?

  I'm interested the upgrade of my d5200t (and perhaps my SR5125CL) to several graphics cards in order to run BOINC projects that can use graphics cards (for example, GPUGRID) better.

  So far, I have found that:

  1. my computer room can not consume much more energy and stay at a comfortable temperature.

  2 GT240 and GTX275 boards have been recommended as the most profitable for the GPUGRID program I want to run.  Motherboards based on the ATI (probably HD58xx series or higher only) may eventually become usable, but not before some time after AMD/ATI releases the next updates of their OpenCL compiler.

  3. two GT240 boards instead of the 9800GT card I would be now about dual GPU computing without current power significantly more power.  How many of these cards motherboards will hold?

  Where can I buy the appropriate cards online, with an installation service?

  It's your motherboard.  It has only a 1 PCI - E x 16 slot for a video card.  Also watch the video chart area for restrictions.  Your PC specifications indicate that your PC has a 460 watt power supply which is good but not big enough for larger video cards.  The GTX 260 and above all probably need one more great power will provide.

  Review the specifications of performance ATI and NVIDIA . Look at the specifications of strip memory bandwidth and level of DirectX support.

  Your PC local repair shop and manage a video card and power supply installation. You can get a quote before you buy a video card.

  www.Newegg.com has a lot of video cards.

• I have several different cards to show the same article in a collection?

  I have several different cards to show the same article in a collection?

  Cause the client wants several different cards in the main browser page, but all of these cards must call or redirect to the cover or the main article intro!

  Thank you very much in advance guys!

  You may need to download the article several times.

• Multiple Crypto cards on a single Interface of ASA

  Hello

  I work with a TAC support engineer, and while troubleshooting it suggests to assign two different cryptographic cards on a single interface.

  It is technically possible to have multiple Crypto maps on a single Interface ASA?

  PS: I know have several sequences in a single encryption card would work, but it is a case that I must address multiple Crypto maps on a single ASA.

  Hi Ali,

  The rule is by interface, a single card encryption is supported. You cannot assign more than one encryption on a single interface card.

  Documentation: -.
  "You can only assign a single encryption card defined on an interface. If multiple crypto map entries with the same name of card but a sequence number different, they are part of the same series and are applied to the interface. ASA first assesses the entry card crypto with sequence number low. »

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ASA/ASA-command-reference/A-H/cmdref1/C6.html

  Kind regards
  Dinesh Moudgil

  PS Please rate helpful messages.

• Supported IOS 12.3 for Stateful Crypto cards

  I try to understand which version of IOS 12.3 to support 7206 and 2651 crypto with card condition. All the docs I found on cisco.com regarding emissions recommended by the 12.3 train are deferred. I thought because this feature was added in 12.2; then it would be available in 12.3. I tried business, IP Plus, IPSEC, 3DES packages in several releases of 12.3, but none understand the dynamic command at the end of the crypto map command applied to an interface.

  Erik,

  2651 routers are end of sale and 12.3 Mainline is the last mainline support. This is the reason why you see no T or Mainline 12.4 12.3 for routers 2651. Please see the below URL for more details.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/routers/ps259/prod_eol_notice09186a008032d4c2.html

  You must use a different chassis that supports T 12.3 or 12.4 mainline to test IPSEC Stateful.

  Kind regards

  Arul

  * Please note all useful messages *.

• [ERR] crypto card WARNING: this encryption card is incomplete

  I have ver6.3 (5) PIX 501 when I configure VPN I get this error message

  WARNING: this encryption card is incomplete to remedy the situation add a peer and a list of valid access to this encryption card.

  Although it seems very well in HS conf command

  but the tunnel is not started

  When I Review Journal I found

  sa_request, exchange ISAKMP Phase 1 started

  Put the following command on the PIX and try again:

  ISAKMP identity address

  Also please check the keys pre-shared at both ends (make sure that there are no spaces).

  If it still doesn't work, please send log of

  Debug crypto isakmp 127

  Concerning

  Farrukh

• Cisco 877 - issue crypto card

  We have implemented a L2L VPN between a cisco 877 and an ASA 5505.

  On the side of 877, we have:

  Dialer 0: connect to the internet and has a dynamic IP given by ISP

  Loopback1: has a static IP address of the public IP range assigned.

  VLAN 1: has a static private IP address for the local network

  FE3: Interface conencted to lan

  We have the following problem.

  We have applied the card encryption to the loopback interface and with this configuration we can reach the interface of the internal router (VLAN 1 IP) from the internal network of ASA, but except that we cannot reach any host inside the router's lan.

  If we apply the encryption card to the interface of FE3 we can ping also lan internal but we lose half of the ping and the return is high (500-800 ms applies rather than 70 to 80 when only 1 Loopback)

  So I need some help here. What should be the correct configuration to have it all works well?

  Thanks in advance

  In the first configuration (crypto-map applied to the loopback interface), you can try this:

  no ip (on Cisco 877) cef

  CEF in many versions have similar problems of your of

• All of a sudden, I can't import all of the photos from my camera. I can see them in the preview, but when I click on import null then imports in the catalog. I've tried several different cards, nothing will matter.

  Out of no where I can not import all the photos in my camera. Loading images and I can see them in a preview. Then when I click on import, it starts and nothing is imported. I tried several maps and images that nothing will matter. Help, please!

  I'm on my way to get a card reader now give that a try. How to use my operating system to copy the files. I see that I can import and add to my existing files on my Mac - photos.

  Once again, appreciate the help. Im going nuts!

• Problems with several PVSCSI cards per vm?

  Hi all - I have a Windows 2008 R2 SQL Server and 3 volumes... 30, 50 GB and 300 GB. I have a separated from PVSCSI adapter bound to each volume. Is this acceptable or favorite? I'm using iSCSI if that's important.

  The reason why I ask, I see latency on long-running queries to my web server to my volume (300 GB) database.

  Is it possible that 3 controllers PVSCSI is exaggerated? I am gaining anyhting with 3?

  Thoughts and comments or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

  What weight are SQL workloads?  PVSCSI driver is actually worse than the regular driver LSI under low I/O workloads.  Read the blog post following by Scott Drummonds (VMware performance guru), as well as this VMware KB on the same subject:

  http://vpivot.com/2010/02/04/pvscsi-and-low-IO-workloads/

  http://KB.VMware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalID=1017652

  In addition, I don't see really any advantage to have several cards PVSCSI by VM, unless you exceed the virtual SCSI devices per SCSI card number. If anything it complicates things a bit and won't give you the performance gains.

• family shares with several credit cards

  If I've set up the family sharing for my iPhone and my iPad 2 children (with 3 different apple id), would it be possible that the purchases for me (on my apple id) is paid by a credit card, and purchases of children (with the permission of me every time) is paid on an another credit card?

  The thing is that I want to have my personal on my personal credit card purchases and purchases families on our family credit card.

  The only thing I've seen so far is that all purchases can be paid my credit card (family sharing directors-apple ID), but this isn't what I want.

  To have your personal purchases on your personal credit card and not the families shopping, you can set up the other accounts with a gift card that gives them a store credit.    See article:

  Purchases and payments - Apple Support families

  Especially the section:

  Make purchases

  After you set up your family, anytime a family member throws a new purchase, that it will be charged directly to your account, unless the family member has gift or store credit. First of all, their store credit will be used to pay the invoice total or partial. The rest will be billed to the card of the family of the Organizer

• audio input read several sound cards

  Heey everybody,

  I have a problem. I want to read two different signals at the same time of 2 different cards. 1 sound card internal of my computer laptop and 1 usb sound card.

  So I used the VI of its acquisition.

  

  Reading the two signals at the same time is not a problem until I took more than about 30 seconds measurement time for. He gets a buffer overrun.

  

  So I tried to do the following:

  

  I did this with 1 signal first and it worked perfectly, every second he has updated.

  But when I added the second signal he wanted only to read the first second of the first signal and then it got stuck, and I had to stop closing software. And then the killing labview with the windows taskmanagement thingey.

  Someone has an idea what is the problem?

  Greetings,

  Jory

  OK, never mind, I have solved. I made the largest buffers (audio input configure block) and now it works like a charm