Sorting problems

Similar Questions

• Playlists sort problems after upgrading to iTunes 12.3.2.25

  Hello.

  My system is 64-bit Windows 10 and everything was fine until I upgraded to (today) to iTunes version 12.3.2.25.

  Now I see that, although my old playlists are always sorted alphabetically, each new playlist that I create is placed at the end of my list (at the bottom, the very last, regardless of the letter, that it starts from)!

  Anyone else having this problem?

  Thank you in advance.

  p.s. Should I restore my system to the restore point that I created just before I installed this version? It will bring me to the previous version that worked without problems?

  Yes, I guess that creating a Restore Point before each update of iTunes is a necessary step in our days... Well, I learned my lesson.

  Only, I restored my system to the restore point that I took just before the update to iTunes, she went back to the 12.3.1.23 version and playlists are now sorted properly...

• SanDisk Clip + sort problem

  Hi all, I read the previous messages in the forum about this problem but nothing is me helped.  I call my mp3 music (more than 2000 of them) starting with an acronym of 3 letters for the band, and then a number that corresponds to the order I want the song to play in this particular group (ex: Frank Zappa songs = ZPA 01 first song name, ZPA 02 second name of the song, ZPA 03 third name of the song) etc.).  Many of my albums are structured with 1 song merging into another, so it is crucial that they play in the proper order.  It works fine when I go to 'Music'-> 'Play All' on my clip +.  Problem is if I go to the 'music '->' artists'-> 'Play All' they are in a competely different order!  Even when I do a different type of subselect as 'Music'-> 'Types '->' Play All'.

  I need to be able to select a specific artist, and control the order of the songs from this artist, so can someone tell me:

  (1) why this happens?

  (2) what can I enter in the MP3 tag which specific for it to sort the way I want to force?

  Thank you!

  Artist, Album, Genre are all labels. No records. The Clip concludes these labels ID3 Tags.

  But if you click on to the bottom of the artist, Album, etc., you'll see the folders. You can read the file in the order the names of the tracks.

  Play everything probably goes into music, and I play through each Album in alphabetical order by title of the album.

  Or you can fix the ID3 tags.

  Download the free program mp3tag. http://www.mp3Tag.de/en/

  When you install it let it be added to the context menus (an option during installation).

  After installed, open it and go to tools, Options, Tags, Mpeg and under writing choose ID3v2.3 and ISO-8859-1. (ISO-8859-1, this is how Windows displays the text in the English language).  Make sure that those who are saved.

  Click on an album, and then look at the tags. Click on the header name of the file to put in order - as you did the names of files - and then fill in the other fields correctly. You can labelled the album both highlighting everything and put the artist, Album, etc. in the box on the left.

  MP3 tag also has some other nifty features. One is assistant tools/auto-numbering. Make sure the files are in order, from top to bottom, reading, choose the option of leading zeros. If an album has 10 tracks and they are labeled, 1, 2, 3, etc., the Clip will play 1, 11, 12, 13, before 2.  This is perhaps what is happening. Leading zeros fixed that.

  Under Convert, you can convert your files in tag names.  It's pretty obvious, how it works, each field is shown by the artist %, etc.  So in the conversion box, you can type ZPA Track %%d % title % and he should ignore ZPA and fill in the other fields. This could be your best option, but mp3tag is very flexible, and you should understand something.

  It is best to take off the Clip files problem, fix them on the computer and return. You can also remove MTABLE. SYS of the clip - which is the database of the ID3 tags - and when you unplug it will make a fresh shiny new MTABLE. SYS to your new tags.

  Further, it takes about 5 seconds to run the wizard to autodial on each album, until you add it to the clamp and it will prevent many problems.

• ATG 10.2 CSC ticket history sort problem

  Hello

  I am facing an issue related triage in the grid of 'Historical Ticket' of the CSC.

  In this grid, there are several columns - ticket Id, Description, creates, age, status, but the sort option only works when I click on the 'ticket Id' column.

  By clicking on the sign of the arrow next to the ticket Id, all columns are get sorted but same behavior does not work when I click on the other columns -Description, creation, status, age.

  I tried to console alert in various jsp but unable to find so exact of these columns are rendered.

  I know that these grid/table are defined in /Service-UI/Framework/Agent/config/atg/svc/agent/ui/tables/ticket/CustomerTicketGrid.properties but of jsp perspective I'm not able to understand.
  

  Can anyone suggest / Help on this issue?

  
  

  

  
  

  Kind regards

  Prateek Gupta
  

  
  

  I am able to fix this by myself.

  There is no need to find jsp; It is a configuration problem.

  We need only set the sortField property and sorting works fine then.

  Kind regards

  Prateek Gupta

• Sort problem: ORDER BY the numbers all first instead of characters first

  Hello
  
  I need help with the problem of the following sort:
  
  create table test01 (sorting_column varchar2 (30));
  
  insert into values test01 ('Test123');
  insert into values test01 ("Test987");
  insert into values test01 ("123Test");
  insert into values test01 ("987Test");
  insert into test01 values (string 'test');
  
  Select sorting_column from test01 arrested by sorting_column;
  
  SORTING_COLUMN
  ------------------------------
  Test string
  Test123
  Test987
  123Test
  987Test
  
  This is not the order that I need. I really wish it were (numbers before characters):
  
  123Test
  987Test
  Test123
  Test987
  Test string
  
  Can anyone help?
  
  Thanks in advance,
  Marc

  SELECT sorting_column
  FROM test01
  ORDER BY nlssort(sorting_column, 'NLS_SORT=BINARY')
  ;
  

  Can be set at the level of the session as well:

  ALTER SESSION SET NLS_SORT = BINARY;
  

  Published by: odie_63 on June 20, 2011 17:45

• Oracle matrix report - sorting problem

  I have developed a relationship of type matrix in the query I wrote the correct sort order. If I run the query in the TOAD sort order is correct. Display of the data on the report is to give the problem the sort order is different. Could you please tell me is it possible to get the desired sort order.

  In a matrix, you can manage the sort order of the rows/columns by going directly in the field presentation and changing the order of the breakdown, by default the pause command is growing... so your columns/rows are already sorted by default.

  I guess you try to get a descending order, and that's what you see not applied with your ORDER BY clause...

• Sort problem

  It's sorting"available"by lexigraphic... I don't want coming down from the largest to the smallest.

  Can someone tell me why it is sorting this way and how to fix it?

  < pre >

  #header info

  $style = ' < style > BODY {do-family: Arial;} '. do-size: 10pt ;} »

  $style = $style + "TABLE {border: 1px solid black;}. border-collapse: collapse ;} »

  $style = $style + "TH {border: 1px solid black;}. background: #dddddd; padding: 5px; }"

  $style = $style + "TD {border: 1px solid black;}. padding: 5px; }"

  $style = $style + ' < / style >.

  $report = new-Object - TypeName System.Collections.ArrayList

  {foreach ($cluster Get-cluster)

  Get-VMHost-location $cluster | Get-Datastore. %{

  $info = "$($_.)". Datacenter).

  $info += "$($cluster.)." (Name) ".

  $info += "$($_.)." (Name) ".

  $capacity = [math]: Round($_.capacityMB/1024,2)

  $info += "$($capacity)".

  $provision = ([math]: Round (($_.))) ExtensionData.Summary.Capacity - $_. ExtensionData.Summary.FreeSpace + $_. ExtensionData.Summary.Uncommitted)/1GB,2))

  $info += "$($provision)".

  $Available = ([math]: Round (([math]::Round($_.capacityMB/1024,2)) - ([math]: Round (($_.)))))) ExtensionData.Summary.Capacity - $_. ExtensionData.Summary.FreeSpace + $_. ExtensionData.Summary.Uncommitted)/1GB,2)),2))

  $info += "$($available)".

  $avail = ([math]: Round (([math]::Round($_.capacityMB/1024,2)) - ([math]: Round (($_.)))))) ExtensionData.Summary.Capacity - $_. ExtensionData.Summary.FreeSpace + $_. ExtensionData.Summary.Uncommitted)/1GB,2)),2))

  $capacity = ([math]: Round($_.capacityMB/1024,2))

  $percent = "{0:N2}" f (($avail/$capacity) * 100)

  $info += "$($percent)".

  [void] $report.add ($info)

  }

  }

  $html = "< br br > < br > > <.

  $html += ($report |) ConvertFrom-Csv-Header 'Data center', 'Cluster', 'name', 'Ability', ' service ', 'Available', 'PctFree | 'Available' Tri-objet - descent). ConvertTo-html-head $style

  $html > report.html

  < / pre >

  You can try something like this

  $html = "

  #header info

  $style = " "

  $report = @)

  {foreach ($cluster Get-cluster)

  Get-VMHost-location $cluster | Get-Datastore. %{

  $info = "| Select the center of data, Cluster, name, capacity, put in service, available, PctFree

  $info. DataCenter = $_. Datacenter.Name

  $info. Cluster = $cluster. Name

  $info. Name = $_. Name

  $capacity = [math]: Round($_.capacityMB/1024,2)

  $info. Capacity = $capacity

  $provision = ([math]: Round (($_.))) ExtensionData.Summary.Capacity - $_. ExtensionData.Summary.FreeSpace + $_. ExtensionData.Summary.Uncommitted)/1GB,2))

  $info. Set service = $provision

  $info. Available = $capacity - $provision

  $percent = "{0:P2}" (($capacity-$provision) f / $capacité)

  $info. PctFree = $percent

  $report += $info

  }

  }

  "$html +=".
  
  "

  $report | Tri-objet-property available - descending | ConvertTo-html-head $style > report.html

• Producer folio sort problem

  I want to be able to sort the folios of publication descending (year, month, day) so that the most recent editions are on the top... and for folios of 2013 that it works this way, however, he spends in 2010, 2011 and 2012 and all these questions are randomly sorted... I expect that issues of 2012, 2011 and 2010 are sorted in chronological order, so...

  ???

  Unfortunately, the organizer of the Folio producer currently isn't support sorting.

• Check the printing sorting problem

  In our checks check printing program do not come in order. On research I discovered that the check numbers are considered to be rather in the form of text and number, so to solve that I am trying to convert the text to a number first check number and then use the sort expression. I am using now, but in error...
  
  <? sort: (<? xdofx:to_number(PaymentNumber/CheckNumber)? >)? >
  
  Could someone point me on whats wrong I do here?
  
  Thanks in advance for your answer.
  Dinesh

  use

• Language sorting problems

  In our multilingual application, we use (primary) Dutch, french and English.
  On some pages, we sort tables or sort lists of the shuttle.
  
  There is a strange behavior on these pages.
  It seems like this Dutch and french differently from the English.
  Dutch and french tri A-B-C-0-1-2-3
  English sort 0-1-2-3-A-B-C
  
  When we look at our nls settings I don't see a value in nls_sort, so I'm assuming that the Apex sets this property somewhere in the application. How can I change this behavior, because we always want to sort as 0-1-2-3-A-B-C, in all languages.

  If you do not set NLS_SORT sorting is dependent on the NLS_LANGUAGE (and that one is defined, by default depends on the language of your browser).

• Crosstab sort problem

  Hi all, I have the following XML

  <LIST_G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>x</ORD>
  <ID>920486</ID>
  <NAME>MLF Ltd</NAME>
  <DATE_ID>2009-04-01T00:00:00.000-05:00</DATE_ID>
  <MONTH_YR/>
  <BEGIN_DATE>04/30/2009</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.76</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>y</ORD>
  <ID>920486</ID>
  <NAME>MLF Ltd</NAME>
  <DATE_ID/>
  <MONTH_YR>2009-01-01T00:00:00.000-06:00</MONTH_YR>
  <BEGIN_DATE>2009 Avg.</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.76</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>x</ORD>
  <ID>274</ID>
  <NAME>Capital LP</NAME>
  <DATE_ID>2008-11-01T00:00:00.000-05:00</DATE_ID>
  <MONTH_YR/>
  <BEGIN_DATE>11/30/2008</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.551</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>x</ORD>
  <ID>274</ID>
  <NAME>Capital LP</NAME>
  <DATE_ID>2008-12-01T00:00:00.000-06:00</DATE_ID>
  <MONTH_YR/>
  <BEGIN_DATE>12/31/2008</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.608</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>x</ORD>
  <ID>274</ID>
  <NAME>Capital LP</NAME>
  <DATE_ID>2009-01-01T00:00:00.000-06:00</DATE_ID>
  <MONTH_YR/>
  <BEGIN_DATE>01/31/2009</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.59</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>x</ORD>
  <ID>274</ID>
  <NAME>Capital LP</NAME>
  <DATE_ID>2009-02-01T00:00:00.000-06:00</DATE_ID>
  <MONTH_YR/>
  <BEGIN_DATE>02/28/2009</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.549</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>x</ORD>
  <ID>274</ID>
  <NAME>Capital LP</NAME>
  <DATE_ID>2009-03-01T00:00:00.000-06:00</DATE_ID>
  <MONTH_YR/>
  <BEGIN_DATE>03/31/2009</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.576</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>x</ORD>
  <ID>274</ID>
  <NAME>Capital LP</NAME>
  <DATE_ID>2009-04-01T00:00:00.000-05:00</DATE_ID>
  <MONTH_YR/>
  <BEGIN_DATE>04/30/2009</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.726</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>y</ORD>
  <ID>274</ID>
  <NAME>Capital LP</NAME>
  <DATE_ID/>
  <MONTH_YR>2009-01-01T00:00:00.000-06:00</MONTH_YR>
  <BEGIN_DATE>2009 Avg.</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.61025</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>y</ORD>
  <ID>274</ID>
  <NAME>Capital LP</NAME>
  <DATE_ID/>
  <MONTH_YR>2008-01-01T00:00:00.000-06:00</MONTH_YR>
  <BEGIN_DATE>2008 Avg.</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>6.90583333333333333333333333333333333333E-01</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>y</ORD>
  <ID>274</ID>
  <NAME>Capital LP</NAME>
  <DATE_ID/>
  <MONTH_YR>2007-01-01T00:00:00.000-06:00</MONTH_YR>
  <BEGIN_DATE>2007 Avg.</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>1.10675</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>x</ORD>
  <ID>12</ID>
  <NAME>GCapital LP</NAME>
  <DATE_ID>2008-11-01T00:00:00.000-05:00</DATE_ID>
  <MONTH_YR/>
  <BEGIN_DATE>11/30/2008</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.725</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>x</ORD>
  <ID>12</ID>
  <NAME>GCapital LP</NAME>
  <DATE_ID>2008-12-01T00:00:00.000-06:00</DATE_ID>
  <MONTH_YR/>
  <BEGIN_DATE>12/31/2008</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.713</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>x</ORD>
  <ID>12</ID>
  <NAME>GCapital LP</NAME>
  <DATE_ID>2009-01-01T00:00:00.000-06:00</DATE_ID>
  <MONTH_YR/>
  <BEGIN_DATE>01/31/2009</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.6</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>x</ORD>
  <ID>12</ID>
  <NAME>GCapital LP</NAME>
  <DATE_ID>2009-02-01T00:00:00.000-06:00</DATE_ID>
  <MONTH_YR/>
  <BEGIN_DATE>02/28/2009</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.557</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>x</ORD>
  <ID>12</ID>
  <NAME>GCapital LP</NAME>
  <DATE_ID>2009-03-01T00:00:00.000-06:00</DATE_ID>
  <MONTH_YR/>
  <BEGIN_DATE>03/31/2009</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.582</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>x</ORD>
  <ID>12</ID>
  <NAME>GCapital LP</NAME>
  <DATE_ID>2009-04-01T00:00:00.000-05:00</DATE_ID>
  <MONTH_YR/>
  <BEGIN_DATE>04/30/2009</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.73</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>y</ORD>
  <ID>12</ID>
  <NAME>GCapital LP</NAME>
  <DATE_ID/>
  <MONTH_YR>2009-01-01T00:00:00.000-06:00</MONTH_YR>
  <BEGIN_DATE>2009 Avg.</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.61725</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>y</ORD>
  <ID>12</ID>
  <NAME>GCapital LP</NAME>
  <DATE_ID/>
  <MONTH_YR>2008-01-01T00:00:00.000-06:00</MONTH_YR>
  <BEGIN_DATE>2008 Avg.</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.8865</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>y</ORD>
  <ID>12</ID>
  <NAME>GCapital LP</NAME>
  <DATE_ID/>
  <MONTH_YR>2007-01-01T00:00:00.000-06:00</MONTH_YR>
  <BEGIN_DATE>2007 Avg.</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>1.47333333333333333333333333333333333333E00</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>x</ORD>
  <ID>135</ID>
  <NAME>Fund Ltd</NAME>
  <DATE_ID>2008-11-01T00:00:00.000-05:00</DATE_ID>
  <MONTH_YR/>
  <BEGIN_DATE>11/30/2008</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT/>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>x</ORD>
  <ID>135</ID>
  <NAME>Fund Ltd</NAME>
  <DATE_ID>2008-12-01T00:00:00.000-06:00</DATE_ID>
  <MONTH_YR/>
  <BEGIN_DATE>12/31/2008</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.705</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>x</ORD>
  <ID>135</ID>
  <NAME>Fund Ltd</NAME>
  <DATE_ID>2009-01-01T00:00:00.000-06:00</DATE_ID>
  <MONTH_YR/>
  <BEGIN_DATE>01/31/2009</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.617</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>x</ORD>
  <ID>135</ID>
  <NAME>Fund Ltd</NAME>
  <DATE_ID>2009-02-01T00:00:00.000-06:00</DATE_ID>
  <MONTH_YR/>
  <BEGIN_DATE>02/28/2009</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.562</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>x</ORD>
  <ID>135</ID>
  <NAME>Fund Ltd</NAME>
  <DATE_ID>2009-03-01T00:00:00.000-06:00</DATE_ID>
  <MONTH_YR/>
  <BEGIN_DATE>03/31/2009</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.587</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>x</ORD>
  <ID>135</ID>
  <NAME>Fund Ltd</NAME>
  <DATE_ID>2009-04-01T00:00:00.000-05:00</DATE_ID>
  <MONTH_YR/>
  <BEGIN_DATE>04/30/2009</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.733</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>y</ORD>
  <ID>135</ID>
  <NAME>Fund Ltd</NAME>
  <DATE_ID/>
  <MONTH_YR>2009-01-01T00:00:00.000-06:00</MONTH_YR>
  <BEGIN_DATE>2009 Avg.</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.62475</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>y</ORD>
  <ID>135</ID>
  <NAME>Fund Ltd</NAME>
  <DATE_ID/>
  <MONTH_YR>2008-01-01T00:00:00.000-06:00</MONTH_YR>
  <BEGIN_DATE>2008 Avg.</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>.705</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  <G_EXP>
  <ORD>y</ORD>
  <ID>135</ID>
  <NAME>Fund Ltd</NAME>
  <DATE_ID/>
  <MONTH_YR>2007-01-01T00:00:00.000-06:00</MONTH_YR>
  <BEGIN_DATE>2007 Avg.</BEGIN_DATE>
  <PCT>2.26833333333333333333333333333333333333E00</PCT>
  </G_EXP>
  </LIST_G_EXP>
  My crosstab looks like below..
  (1,1)<?horizontal-break-table:1?>
  (1,2)<?for-each-group@column:G_EXP;./BEGIN_DATE?><?sort:ORD;'ascending';data-type='text'?><?sort:DATE_ID;'ascending';data-type='text'?><?BEGIN_DATE?><?end for-each-group?>
  (2,1)<?for-each-group:G_EXP;./NAME?><?variable@incontext:G1;current-group()?><?NAME?>
  (2,2)<?for-each-group@cell://G_EXP;./BEGIN_DATE?><?sort:ORD;'ascending';data-type='text'?><?sort:DATE_ID;'ascending';data-type='text'?><?($G1[(./BEGIN_DATE=current()/BEGIN_DATE)]/PCT)?><?end for-each-group?><?end for-each-group?>
  My current output for column headings is...I'm unable to provide my whole o/p here due to space constrains I guess..
               11/30/2008 12/31/2008 01/31/2009 02/28/2009 03/31/2009 04/30/2009 2007 Avg. 2008 Avg. 2009 Avg.
  Can I get something like...Check the last 3 columns...
               11/30/2008 12/31/2008 01/31/2009 02/28/2009 03/31/2009 04/30/2009 2009 Avg. 2008 Avg. 2007 Avg.
  Thanks in advance..

  Published by: user10280715 on May 28, 2009 13:05

  I think 4 + ways of dealing with this right now.

  One:
  Separate the grouping based on the data and the year of the avg.
  the solution is below.

  1,1 = 
  1,2 = 
           
           
           
  1,3 = 
           
           
          
  2,1 = 
  2,2 = 
           
           
           
  2,3 = 
           
           
           
           
  

  two:
  Simply adding the desc in the field of the MONTH_YR.

  1,1 = 
  1,2 = 
         
         
         
         
         
  2,1 = 
         
         
  2,2 = 
         
         
         
         
         
         
  

  Third:

  If you want to reduce sorting in RTF, that I prefer, then may be small change in the query is required.

  Delete the order of 3,1,4,5 desc of the query, since your order and the sorting is done in RTF ;)
  It is useless code, unless you need it for other reasons.

  Use the same RTF you have. and use the following query.

  SELECT 'x' ord,
         id,
        name,
         to_date(month_begin_date_id,'YYYYMMDD') date_id,
         null month_yr,
         to_char(last_day(to_date(month_begin_date_id,'YYYYMMDD')),'MM/DD/YYYY') begin_date,
         pct/100 pct
  from tables.
  union
  SELECT 'y'||10000-to_char(to_date(month_begin_date_id,'YYYYMMDD'),'YYYY') ord,
         id,
         name,
         null,
         trunc(to_date(month_begin_date_id,'YYYYMMDD'),'YYYY') month_yr,
         to_char(to_date(month_begin_date_id,'YYYYMMDD'),'YYYY') || ' Avg.' begin_date,
         avg(pct/100) pct
  from tables.
  group by 'y'||10000-to_char(to_date(month_begin_date_id,'YYYYMMDD'),'YYYY'),
           id,
           name,
           trunc(to_date(month_begin_date_id,'YYYYMMDD'),'YYYY'),
           to_char(to_date(month_begin_date_id,'YYYYMMDD'),'YYYY')
  

  Fourth:
  I prefer to reduce sorting in model;).
  I like to take the burden of the model ;) and give the beautiful Monster database to manage heavy work.

  SELECT 'x'||month_begin_date_id ord,
         id,
        name,
         to_date(month_begin_date_id,'YYYYMMDD') date_id,
         null month_yr,
         to_char(last_day(to_date(month_begin_date_id,'YYYYMMDD')),'MM/DD/YYYY') begin_date,
         pct/100 pct
  from tables.
  union
  SELECT 'y'||10000-to_char(to_date(month_begin_date_id,'YYYYMMDD'),'YYYY') ord,
         id,
         name,
         null,
         trunc(to_date(month_begin_date_id,'YYYYMMDD'),'YYYY') month_yr,
         to_char(to_date(month_begin_date_id,'YYYYMMDD'),'YYYY') || ' Avg.' begin_date,
         avg(pct/100) pct
  from tables.
  group by 'y'||10000-to_char(to_date(month_begin_date_id,'YYYYMMDD'),'YYYY'),
           id,
           name,
           trunc(to_date(month_begin_date_id,'YYYYMMDD'),'YYYY'),
           to_char(to_date(month_begin_date_id,'YYYYMMDD'),'YYYY')
  
  I assumed the month_begin_date_id columns holds the data in YYYYMMDD format.
  else use to_char function to convert it to YYYYMMDD 
  

  And in the template, remove sorting on DATE_ID. Just use spell on DSB ;)
  delete

  (1,1)
  (1,2)
         
         
  (2,1)
         
  (2,2)
         
         
         
  

• Group sorting problems

  I have three tables in a management system of contacts that I use. The first is the prmContacts with First, Last and other info. The second is prmFollowup which refers to the prmContactID and contains a comment and in the field of the appointment. The third is a prmInfo that contains the name of the company and the active/inactive status.

  I need to generate a repeating list which contains the name, name, company name and fields of appointment. I've got evertything worked except that I can't seem to make the attraction info displayed up to the last field of appointment.

  Here is my SQL query.

  $query_activeContactsRS = "SELECT prmContacts.id, prmContacts.custFname, prmContacts.custLname, prmInfo.companyName, prmFollowup.nextAppointment, prmFollowup.nxtTime.

  OF prmContacts, prmInfo, prmFollowup

  WHERE the prmContacts.id = prmFollowup.prmContactID AND prmInfo.prmContactID = prmFollowup.prmContactID AND prmContacts.custActive = 'Yes '.

  GROUP BY prmContacts.id DESC

  ORDER BY prmFollowup.id DESC";

  Let's talk about the request. Match the customer contact and the prmFollowup is perfect. The GROUP OF prmContacts.id keep duplicate for each prmContact.id entries shows upward so that I find myself with a list of only my contacts. Although the GROUP BY method, I find myself with a new line for each field of prmFollowup. What I want is just the last displayed the tracking record. With this request I display the first row of follow-up.

  If anyone has any ideas on how to make this work please let me know. At this point, that the only work-around, I can think of involves a link to another page to view the next apporintment for the contact.

  > This should not be so difficult.

  It is not, but you should know a few things. The most simple is to create a list of IDS that meet your selection criteria - that is, get the max (ID) to each contact - and then use it in the WHERE clause of the main, SELECT

  This will produce the list of identifiers that you need for each contact.

  SELECT Max (prmFollowUp.ID) AS MaxOfID

  OF prmFollowUp

  GROUP BY prmFollowUp.contact;

  Include in the main statement like this:

  SELECT contacts, favColor

  OF prmFollowup

  WHERE ID in

  (SELECT Max (ID)

  OF prmFollowUp

  Contact GROUP)

  There are other ways to do it too - using correlated subqueries and derived tables. If you do not have as many lines probably little matter, but as your number of lines increases you can optimize by using one of these other methods. Here is an example: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/438938/sql-server-only-last-entry-in-group-by

• Sites Web using php and mysql successfully stopped the week last of sorting drop-down lists. Change something?

  We run a programme of internal timesheet open source called Timesheet Next Gen available on Sourceforge. We have it worked for a few years without any problems. We moved all of our Firefox users because the developer has indicated that there are questions of the sort associated with PHP and MYSQL via Internet Explorer. Dropdown lists using surveyed data did not follow the order of sorting and list have been blurred without order with duplicate entries. We had experienced this on our Windows 7 workstations in Internet Explorer (any version) and everything worked fine in Firefox. For some of us with the MacBook, the sort worked well in Firefox and Safari.

  Departure last week (perhaps Tuesday or Wednesday) all our users to Workstation Windows 7 has started to have the same sorting problems in Firefox with our internal website of timesheet. There is no change for timesheet Web site or the server that is running as much as php and server extensions web apache. I've since updated the server (Ubuntu) and apache, mysql and php are underway. Now sort in Firefox has stop working on our mac workstations. Safari is the only browser that works. We have installed Chrome on mac and Windows 7 and it does not sort either.

  To wrap to the top of this thread, the solution is available here: http://sourceforge.net/p/tsheetx/discussion/779084/thread/02841540/

  The general idea behind that the solution can be applied to other projects where a JavaScript object is created in PHP and you need access to its members in order of addition.

• sorting of the column 'To' of windows live mail is not sort correctly

  Windows Live Mail email sort problem

  I'm trying to sort email in the "To" column, but it does not properly sort by the name of the recipient. In fact, the kind that result is meaningless.

  Ask in the Windows Live Solution Center Mail Portal. Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]
  --------------------------------
  https://MVP.support.Microsoft.com/profile/Brian.Tillman
  If a response may help, please vote it as useful. If a response to the problem, please mark it as an answer.

• Wireless internet problems

  Hello

  I have a laptop HP G60, I find that I can not connect to internet. It was working fine last week, but today, my wireless switch remains red and my wireless connection is not on the network. I use windows 7

  I've updated all the drivers, but I still get no joy.

  Any help greatly appreciated

  Sort problem. All I had to do was press the wifi button twice and he reconnected!