The exported photos has random resolution

Similar Questions

• the exported photos are lighter

  Hallo,

  I use LR for years, started by 3.

  Now I'm starting ro reduce the no of pictures and also the size here.

  One way is exporting to a smaller size.

  By doing this, I observed that the exported photos are lighter than the developed version!

  What can I do to achieve the same quality?

  Data settings:

  Org photo. has about 12 MB (Nikon NEF RAW of =)

  Export to: JPEG, sRGB, quality 100, size 1 MB

  No additional parameters

  Please enlighten me

  Thank you

  Edgar

  Am 29.02.16 um 16:34 dj_paige wrote:

  >

  the exported photos are lighter

  created by dj_paige https://forums.adobe.com/people/dj_paige> in

  / Photoshop Lightroom /-see complete discussion

  https://forums.Adobe.com/message/8546817#8546817>

• I can't open my library of Photos. After trying to fix it I get the message - Photos has attempted to repair the library 'Photos', but is unable to open it.

  I recently got a new iMac - 2.8 GHz, 16 GB RAM, El Capitan running. I transferred most of my backup files to my old iMac which had been damaged during a lightning strike. In the five or six weeks I had the new a whole has been very well. Today, I tried to open the pictures. I received the message that my photo library had some inconsistencies and that it should be repaired. After I pressed the button fix I looked at 95% and then it stop the progress bar and I got the message - "Photos has attempted to repair the library 'Photos', but is unable to open it.  I don't suspect that the lightning had something to with him because I opened pictures at least once on the new iMac. I've set up a new library 'Photos library2', and it seems to work very well how can I recover the pictures that are on the "damaged library"?

  where the library "damaged"? If a disk external hard whrta format is it and how is it connected?

  LN

• watermark does not appear on the exported photos

  I followed all the instructions and steps to follow for the tattoo and it was working fine and now it does not want to add a watermark to the exported photos

  If you zoom in on exports that you thought no watermark, you would discover that nestled very tiny in the left corner of the image was a very likely diminutive watermark. The standard watermark does not work well if the size of your image is too large, it will become absolutely tiny. You can add a copyright sign by placing it in the field of copyright of metadata or by creating a custom watermark (menu Lightroom-> edit watermarks...). This will allow you to create a text watermark which will scale to any size of export. How to type a copyright sign a lot depends on the operating system.

  On a Mac it's-g option: on windows you press the ALT key and type '0169"while holding down the alt key.

• The exported photos do not appear in the Finder

  I just discovered a quirk in the photos that might confuse some users how it confused me for a while.   It seemed to me to export successfully to the photos and videos from the photos app in a folder on my desktop, but they do not. Everything seemed to work. What was wrong?

  I used the Terminal command to "show all files" and... that is, they were there exactly where I put them. What happened is that I have selected 'use the title' for the name of the file, but I had deleted all the titles, there is no information. Now I realize that I would have changed my preference finder to show all file extensions, and would have shown the speed to the top with nothing else than the extension:

  .jpg

  .jpg (1)

  .jpg (2)

  .jpg (3)

  etc.

  The lesson is, do not delete your pictures titles or if you do, do not export your photos by selecting this option.

  WoW!  It's really interesting. Thanks for sharing this!

  I tried to reproduce this, and of course, I see the same thing on OS X 10.11.4.  The problem is, that a title erasing does not remove the title but creates a blank title, so that the picture has a title that is invisible.

  As a test, import three new photos to multiple:

  

  The first has a title, the other had a title, but deleted, the third party has never had a title.

  When I select and export with title use 'as filename', only two photos will be displayed in the Finder.

  The problem is, that deleting a title does not remove the title, but adds an empty title. If the photos are exported with the filename ".jpg".

  And even make the Finder always show file extensions will not reveal the exported '.jpg' files in the Finder.

  

  As a workaround solution, do not erase the title completely, but use an underscore character, as in the empty title '_' or similar. There needs to be a visible figure, a space is not enough.

  

  Have you filed a bug report?   Apple - Photos - comments

• What is the difference between the export photos and pictures of unmodified export

  I'm trying to export my library of photos of 30 GB on a hard drive. When you choose file > export gives two options: export the Photos... and export Unmodified Original...

  Is there a difference between the two options?

  When I export the location data is backed up?

  The original unmodified are image files full-size that have been imported into the library at the start.

  Export Photos will give you the edited version (if it is edited).  Also, you will have a chance to change the size of the file (Mbs) and/or the image (pixels) size when exporting and to change the JPEG, tiff or png.

  

• Watermark not appearing is not on the exported Photos

  So, I got the picture of fixed size. But, now I can't get the watermark to appear on my exported photos.

  Can someone help me here please?

  Thank you, Jesse Williams

  When you go (Lightroom - watermark)

  You choose the style of watermark: text (for testing)

  You choose a font (not important)

  Effect of watermark you choose 100% (for test)

  You choose a size of the watermark 30 (just to test)

  You should now see an example of the watermark on an image. Is this correct?

  Then try an another export.

  kind regard

  Daniel (from Switzerland)

• All the exported photos to Photoshop Fix get their reduced resolution

  Hi all

  All pictures exported from Photoshop Fix get their resolution reduced to 2048 x 1152 (the original was 4240 x 2384). I tried to use photos directly from the cloud (without lightroom), but it's the same question. Soon, I want to export to Photoshop (office) or save to cloud the library, the resolution is reduced. Any tips?

  Thanks for your help

  Jean-yan

  Hello! Fix can now open image full resolution instead of images of downsizing to 2048px opening compared to the Creative clouds > Lightroom. You attempted to update your application and checking if the problem persists with the new version?

  Thank you!

  -Kathleen

• Don't want all the exported photos when developing ONE - (STUPID BEHAVIOR)

  It is a default setting very stupid that Lightroom has.

  I was working on a group of photos. I went to edit the meta and then synchronize this data to all the photos. Once I'm done with it, I double click on a photo and went into the development of this last. Then I've switched back to library to export and export ALL my photos.

  Why the hell would they do this by default?

  How can I stop that does not happen? (please don't say go back and deselect all photos, because this behavior has no other product from Adobe)

  When you double-click on something, he should solo as he does EACH WHERE OTHER. If you have a picture in development mode and click on export you should only export this 1 photo. It must be something to do if you want to export all. This behavior has cost me an extra 1 HR unravel what I edited and what I didn't.

  I don't even know if my changes in development mode has been applied to everything that has been exported.

  You had all the photos highlighted so that you could synchronize metadata. A double click on the single image didn't cancel the culmination of all of the other images. When you went in the dialog box export images highlighted have been exported. If you want to undo the highlighting of several images, you must click in the grey border around the image. By clicking on the image itself will bring focus to this image, but will not deselect the other images. The only "flaw" in this regard is that all images that are highlighted will BE exported. You just look a little closer

  .

• Now the Export Module has disappeared, how do I convert a thousand goals as JPEGS (but only where they do not already exist)?

  I need to create files JPEG of hair in a few hundred subfolders.  They need to save in the same place as their original TIF and skip record if the jpeg already exists.

  A walk in the Park by using the defunct export Module.  I spent an hour studying how do I do this now, it is gone and I can't for the life of me get by.

  I investigated the Photoshop Image Processor and batch - not only it would be incredibly slow, as it is open each file in photoshop and then save again, there is no option to skip the file if it already has a saved jpeg file.  In fact, worse still, it just seems to add a "_1" on the end of the file it creates eventually give me hundreds of duplicates.

  Anyone knows how is to take about it?

  Dan

  You can do this with a script.

  For example this will convert all tif to jpg files in the current folder if they do not exist.

  #target bridge;
  if( BridgeTalk.appName == "bridge" ) {
      tif2jpg = MenuElement.create("command", "Convert TIF to JPG", "at the end of Tools");
  }
  tif2jpg.onSelect = function (){
  app.document.deselectAll();
  var sels = app.document.getSelection("tif");
  for(var z  in sels){
  var Thumb1 = new Thumbnail(sels[z]);
  var jpgName = Thumb1.spec.toString().replace(/tif$/i, "jpg");
  if(File(jpgName).exists) continue;
  app.synchronousMode = true;
  bm = Thumb1.core.fullsize.fullsize;
  app.synchronousMode = false;
  if(bm.width != undefined) {
  bm = bm.rotate(Thumb1.spec.rotation);
  bm.exportTo(new File(jpgName),100);
      }
      }
  };
  

• What book format uses the exported photo sort order?

  I've sorted in a photo album. I want to use this order even for a book that I've created.  The options in book styles do not seem to honor my sorting system.  Is there a particular format or style should I use? or do I have to count and sort like that?

  Or add them and place them in small batches - in the book they are in chronological order - suggest an option to Apple - http://www.apple.com/feedback/photos.html

  LN

• PhotoShop scaling of the evil on the export photos

  Hi there, funny thing here... When I export images, jpg, png och psd:s same, photoshop scaling to the horizontal av the bad image, look at the captures. It started when I updated the software of the other day.

  Any ideas?

  

  

  Could you post the image itself?

  In Photoshop, what is the point of view > setting the format of pixels?

• The export of Lightroom only in low resolution

  I can't export photos from Lightroom with high resolution more since last week (or my last update of Lightroom). Export settings are always the same (jpg, quality 100, sRGB, 300 pixels). The export file has 190 KB, although the image itself is about 43 MB. What could be the reason and what can do?

  Thank you very much!

  Monika

  500 x 500 pixels, 190 KB in size is a reasonable number.   Post screenshots of your settings dialog box export and as a DJ asked, the size of the CROPPED photo that you export.

• How can I get rid of the tattoo the automatic imputation of exported photos?

  I am eager to preferably Ligthroom 6 so that the tattoo will not appear in the exported photos.  How can I do this?

  Hi gregm

  Please uncheck watermark under "Watermarking".

  

  Concerning

  Assani

• Check if a photo has adjustments

  Hello

  I develop an export filter and I am looking for a way to determine if a LRPhoto has any adjustment applied (i.e. If the icon "Photo has develop adjustments" is displayed).

  Because I couldn't find anything in the API, I now use LRPhoto:getDevelopSettings() and check if some common parameters are different from their default values.

  Of course, it is quite fragile, so I want to know if there is a better way to do it.

  Invoke the catalogue: findPhotos() with the criterion "hasAdjustments = true AND file name starts with "and then test if the photo is in the photo array returned. "  This should be fast enough to call for each photo in question.  If this isn't the case, you can call the entire catalog and cache the results.