The scenario that is balanced with two static routes without remote administration.

Hello

I'm setting up a switch 3750 PSI using MHSRP provider on the side. In fact I use two GigaEthernet connections.

I want to create my side by using the static routes of load balancing, but traffic flows that I see are not identical or similar.

See the router # running | Start iproute

[...]

IP route 10.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.255.255.1
IP route 10.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 10.255.255.6

[...]

Router # show ip route

[...]
S * 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 192.168.0.254
10.0.0.0/16 is variably divided into subnets, subnets 23, 5 masks
10.0.0.0/16 S [1/0] via 10.255.255.6
[1/0] via 10.255.255.1

[...]

Either way, ip cef is already activated

Here is the result:

Interface 1

GigabitEthernet1 is up, line protocol is up (connected)

[...]

Strategy of queues: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 35046000 bps, 4638 packets/s
5 minute output rate 8671000 bps, 3846 packets/s

Interface 2

GigabitEthernet2 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
[...]
Strategy of queues: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 1000 bps, 2 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 3859000 bps, 1714 packets/s

IP CEF:

router ip cef #show
Interface of the jump following the prefix
10.0.0.0/16 10.255.255.1 Vlan99
10.255.255.6 Vlan99

I have no configuration is no longer on the interfaces. I would add the ip per instruction packet load balancing?

By default cef uses per load balancing destination, set ip load balancing by package on the concert links try again, are your equal to up to 10 links network on each side

Tags: Cisco Network

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for