The use of the MessageFromExtr rule?

Similar Questions

• Issue while loading data using the file Rules Essbase

  Hi all

  I am facing problem while loading data using the Rules file. In the rules file, I rejected several members in two areas (two dimensions). Now if I load the data using the rules file I'm getting errors for all members in the dataload.err file. If I reject mutiple members of a single field, the data load without settling errors in the dataload.err file.

  I want to know how rmany members of several fields of ejection for loading data using the file Rules Essbase? Is it possible?

  Okay, okay... I think that you must assign Global Select / reject Boolean in the parameters of loading data as 'Or':

  

• can I use a disk repair from another win7 machine to fix the firewall rules missing registry keys?

  the two machines are win7 sp1, x 64.  The predefined rules, the other not.

  Nevermind, I fixed it by export/import of the missing registry keys.

• sequence Analyzer: data transfer between the Analyzer rule one sequence to another

  Is there a way by which I can send data to the Analyzer rule a sequence to another.

  I've created rules to count the number of SCOPE, step REQUIREMENT TEXT step, step in the PROCESS

  Now, I want to create another regulation that reads the values of each of these rules

  Tah44-

  One of my colleagues brought a different, probably better idea to my attention this morning:

  Use the AnalysisContext.GetRuleAnalysisData method to access the data of other rule analysis: http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/370052P-01/tsref/infotopics/sa_creating_analysis_modulesimpl...

  -Jeff

• Windows 7 firewall, just after the power rules

  Hello

  Setting up a private workgroup-to-peer network (not homegroup, no servers or domain) of several PC windows 7.  Have all network connections, defined as 'private' of networks.  At that time, the private firewall is disabled, and the Public firwall is enabled.  Administration tool using remote third 3rd RAdmin connect and control the PC.

  Strange behavior just after turn on/off the PC.  Can ping from one PC to another, but RAdmin tool fails to connect to a PC on just.  The 'Public' windows firewall log shows the RAdmin TCP packet dropped.  Once someone has logged on locally to the computer and then connected to the wide, the RAdmin packages are no longer considered (fell or permitted) by the Public firewall, and the RAdmin progam works great.

  I added a test rule to allow all TCP traffic through any firewall from any PC, any user, any port, etc. (essentially large open) and still have the problem where RAdmin specific TCP packets are lost by the Public firewall.

  I can get it to work by setting the 'incoming connections' for the Public firewall to 'Always allow', but is not an acceptable solution.

  I worked with the provider of 3rd party s/w (famatech) and they also have no idea why it works this way.

  Any ideas how the Windows 7 firewall works right after that the PC is on, but before the user login?  Any ideas how can I do an acceptable firewall rule which will be in force after powering on, but before that the user log?

  Thank you in advance for any help or any other ideas,

  Rick

  Answered my own question.  Found that a set Local GPO do not merge rules defined by the user.  When I moved the RAdmin rule throughout the local Group Policy object, problem goes away.

• Priority of the identity rules

  Our customers want to implement authentication with ACS 5.2 802.1 x and AD as base external identiti.

  But what device conect to 802 non802.1xcapable. 1 x active switch port authentication should be with Mac.

  We have configured the switch with 802.1 x and bypass auth MAC.

  Also define AD as a base external identiti and MAC addresses in internal hosts.

  There are two strategies in

  Access policies >... > Access Services> default access to network> identity

  2.

  AD                                        NDG:location in all places AD1

  1. Non802.1xCapableDevices

  NDG:location in all places internal hosts

  The problem is that the frst rule is considered. If we try to authenticate with laptop with 802. 1 x disabled (internal host is MAC) authentication - OK. When enable us 802. 1 x LAN there is no authentication (user not found).

  After that we have changed the order of policies:

  1.

  AD                                        NDG:location in all places AD1

  2. Non802.1xCapableDevices

  NDG:location in all places internal hosts

  The situation is reversed, the user is autenticated, but MAC is not.

  Where is the error?

  Thank you

  In access policies > Access Services > default network access > identity, if you use "Rule based selection of result."

  ACS should just use first game.

  You can set up a 'store of Idnetity sequence' in users and identity stores > store identity sequences, first make sure that you select the host "internal" and then AD. Then you can use this 'identity store sequence' in ' Default Network Access > Identity. "

• Best way to change the default rule in CSA

  People,

  Could someone guide me please how best to change the default rules on the CSA MC. I would like to address some of the rules and I do not know how to change the default rules, can be copied and change them and increase the priority?

  Thank you

  Use the wizard to create the exception. The default value is that it will create an exception to the policy by creating a new module of rule and assign to politics. Then, you can see how the exception works and you can change the exception rather than the rule. This keeps unchanged Moose rules but allows you to make all the necessary changes to get your apps to work.

  Tom S

• helps the nat rule

  Hello

  I try to create a second VPN connection on our companies cisco PIX. It almost works, but I'm having problems to make the nat rules to work for two virtual private networks.

  The config is attached, but the key areas are below.

  Access extensive list ip 192.168.60.0 LeasedLine_20_cryptomap allow London 255.255.255.0 255.255.255.0

  LeasedLine_40_cryptomap list extended access permitted ip object-group LAN_subnet-group of objects InsightLAN

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access LeasedLine_20_cryptomap

  NAT (inside) 101 192.168.60.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (DMZ) 101 172.30.60.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (GM3) 101 192.168.70.0 255.255.255.0

  card crypto LeasedLine_map 20 corresponds to the address LeasedLine_20_cryptomap

  card crypto LeasedLine_map 20 set peer 161.xxx.106.34

  LeasedLine_map 20 transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 crypto card game

  card crypto LeasedLine_map 40 corresponds to the address LeasedLine_40_cryptomap

  card crypto LeasedLine_map 40 set peer 213.xxx172.253

  card crypto LeasedLine_map 40 value transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA

  The problem I have is with the nat 0 command (inside). If I add the command

  NAT (inside) LeasedLine_40_cryptomap 0-list of access VPN 2nd (insight) works, but the first stops working.

  Can someone help me get this to work?

  See you soon,.

  Al

  Hello

  You can have several configurations that have "(inside) nat 0 access-list"

  Instead, you use a simple ACL to set the traffic you don't want NAT. Or for which you want to NAT0.

  If you can do this for example

  the INTERIOR-NAT0 extended ip 192.168.60.0 access list allow London 255.255.255.0 255.255.255.0

  access list to the INSIDE-NAT0 extended permitted ip object-group LAN_subnet-group of objects InsightLAN

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access to the INTERIOR-NAT0

  And the two connections should work perfectly.

  If you arrived to set up a third-party VPN connection for example you would simply add another line to the same LIST.

  Hope this helps

  Don't forget to mark the reply as the answer if it answered your question.

  Ask more if necessary

  -Jouni

• Prevent the business rule to run simultaneously

  Hi all

  We are on Hyperion Planning 11.1.1.3.500. One of our business rules makes the system completely meaningless with its results when some users are running at the same time. A person must have been necessary a HBR not to run when it is already running. I need your suggestions to avoid the business rule to run simultaneously.

  Thank you

  Hello

  • tell users check the console to work first, before you run the rule.

  or

  • have a member of the system in your dimension that you can use as a flag. You set it to 1 as the beginning of the rule to indicate he runs, 0 / #Missing at the end of the rule to indicate is finished. You then add a @RETURN to leave the calculation if this flag is set to 1 in your rule. Just be careful about this because if for any reason the calculation fails, or is killed by an admin then your flag is set to 1, but you can still have a form of admin to reset these flags easily if necessary.

  See you soon

  JM

• How to outsource reference data to the business rule processor?

  Details of the environment

  ======================

  Disqualification Version: 12.1.3.0.0

  By default, the reference (rules, controls and conditions) data used by the business rule processor comes to an excel file or stored in the repository database of the Disqualification.

  Is it possible to use a reference to the data that is stored in a different database (out of the repository database Disqualification) in the processor rule business?

  I tried the externalize option in the processor business rule, but on the identity tab, it is not allow me map the rule to the input attribute.

  

  

  Hello

  You can manage the rules from the outside, but you need to instantly and use research on stereotypes, because the rules of Business Check needs access to the rules at design time.

  -Mike

• Clicked by the decision rule

  I am creating a program and I'm using the rule of decision "Clicked through specific E-mail Web site". When the "Mobile view" or "Manage preferences" link in the email is clicked, is the part of the clicks that will use the decision rule?

  Check the HTML source code on the header and/or footer assigned to the email. It will look like this if it has the redirector link instead of a direct link with the object.

  Eloqua redirect link:

  http://now.Eloqua.com/e/er.aspx?s=xxxx&lid=1055&ELQ= recipientid

  Direct links to other objects are the following (if you use the provided OEM modules)...

  Read online:

  http://now.Eloqua.com/es.asp?s=xxxx&e=53447&ELQ= recipientid

  Global unsubscribe:

  http://app.EN25.com/e/u.aspx?s=xxxx&ELQ= recipientid

  Management of the subscription center

  http://now.Eloqua.com/e/SL.aspx?&s=xxxx&ELQ= recipientid

  Read on mobile

  I don't have it. Anyone want to post it for me? ;-)
  

• How to exclude from the SOUL of the rules if the invoice distribution amount is < 0 (i.e. the negative amount) to the existing rule

  How to exclude from the SOUL of the rules if the invoice distribution amount is < 0 (i.e. the negative amount) to the existing rule.

  Requirement: I have an obligation to send the invoice approval group approval specified when the invoice distribution account is 4567 and charge the amount of distribution > 0

  Finished configurations:

  1. Set condition: the string value to using 4567 supplier_invoice_distribution_gl_account attribute
  2. The condition set: SUPPLIER_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTION_AMOUNT is greater than or equal to 0
  3. Definition of new rule setting the terms of the 1st and 2nd stage and also group attached to this rule approval

  Note: Approval is not required is defined for invoices IN. matched in SOUL.

  Test case:

  1. Corresponding invoice with PO (PO amount is 8000)
  2. Amount of invoice header 5000
  3. Distribution account invoice 5568 as well as the amount is 8000
  4. Inserted 4567 distribution and quantity is - 3000

  Behavior of real: system sends the approval of the Bill for approval related group account 4567

  Expected behavior: invoice approval status should be 'Not necessary', since it is a corresponding purchase order invoice and 4567 account amount is < 0

  Kindly let me know how to set the rule to exclude the ve - amount distribution associated with lines

  Hello

  Then set a rule all 3 conditions:

  If attribute SUPPLIER_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTION_PO_MATCHED = No. and the SUPPLIER_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTION_AMOUNT attribute is less than the 0 attribute and supplier_invoice_distribution_account = <> then no permission.

  Concerning

  Yvette

• Unable to get the correct rules table result when the State is unknown

  Hi all

  I use OPA version 10.4. I'm writing a rule by using a table of rules. Requirement is such that when the State is unknown then conclusion should evaluate to 'Others' (for example). Now, I have a condition (text) attribute and attribute of conclusion (text). Now when the condition attribute value is "abc" then attribute of the conclusion must be "xyz" but when the condition attribute is 'unknown' or anything else then attribute conclusion must be 'other '. I tried to implement this in the two table rules in word doc and also in excel table of rule but failed to get the desired result. It assesses the 'unknown' conclusion when the condition attribute is 'unknown '. Please suggest.

  Thank you

  Mounia

  

  

  Hi Pascal,.

  As the table of treaty rules the rules in the top-down approach, so the 'unknown' State should be written before the value condition.

  If she meets the condition of value firstly she neglects the unknown state and gives the value of the conclusion as 'unknown '.

  Hi Sean,.

  Want your comments on that.

  See you soon,.

  Arup

• Doc to set up the existing rules for DB...

  Someone has a doc or examples of configuration of the severity and action tabs in the existing rules of SQL and Oracle.

  Hi Jim,.

  The available documentation is in using the Global Administration Options and set alarms. Remember, this is not specific to the rules of databases, but rather generic configuration of rules and alarms. If you have a specific question, please report it here so that we can better help you.

  Thank you

  Pedro

• What happened to the command of leaders in Acrobat DC? They appear in the view rules &amp; Guides.

  What happened to the command of leaders in Acrobat DC? They appear in the view rules & Guides.

  Hi alana561876,

  Please see this KB document using the grids, benchmarks and measures in the files PDF, Adobe Acrobat DC.

  Kind regards
  Nicos