This should be a simple query, shouldn't it?

Similar Questions

• Not sure if I can do this with a simple query.

  CREATE TABLE primary_table (SSN VARCHAR2 (15) VARCHAR2 (30) FIRST_NAME, LAST_NAME VARCHAR2 (30), VARCHAR2 (20)) of the STATE;
  
  insert into primary_table VALUES ('111-11-1111, 'Elvis', 'Presley', 'ACTIVE');
  insert into primary_table VALUES (222-22-2222', 'Gift', 'King', 'ACTIVE');
  insert into primary_table VALUES ('33-333-3333, 'Lex', 'Harrison', 'ACTIVE');
  
  CREATE TABLE secondary_table (SSN VARCHAR2 (15) NOT NULL, ARRIVAL DATE, NUMBER of LENGTH_OF_STAY);
  
  insert into secondary_table VALUES ('11-111-1111 ", 1 January 2011", 10);
  insert into secondary_table VALUES (' ' 222-22-2222 ", March 1, 2011", 10);
  insert into secondary_table VALUES (' ' 222-22-2222 ", June 1, 2011", 20);
  insert into secondary_table VALUES ('' 33-333-3333, January 1, 2011 ", 10);
  
  ========================================================================================
  
  Hello
  
  I created two very simple tables for this exercise. I don't know if I can do this with a simple query, or must use pl/sql.
  
  I want to join primary_table secondary_table of SSNand list the fields of primary_table, but only if the join returns only a line.
  
  In other words, I would like to create a list of data primary_table for primary_table lines that have only one line on the secondary table.
  
  
  Concerning

  RF25 wrote:
  CREATE TABLE primary_table (SSN VARCHAR2 (15) VARCHAR2 (30) FIRST_NAME, LAST_NAME VARCHAR2 (30), VARCHAR2 (20)) of the STATE;

  insert into primary_table VALUES ('111-11-1111, 'Elvis', 'Presley', 'ACTIVE');
  insert into primary_table VALUES (222-22-2222', 'Gift', 'King', 'ACTIVE');
  insert into primary_table VALUES ('33-333-3333, 'Lex', 'Harrison', 'ACTIVE');

  CREATE TABLE secondary_table (SSN VARCHAR2 (15) NOT NULL, ARRIVAL DATE, NUMBER of LENGTH_OF_STAY);

  insert into secondary_table VALUES ('11-111-1111 ", 1 January 2011", 10);
  insert into secondary_table VALUES (' ' 222-22-2222 ", March 1, 2011", 10);
  insert into secondary_table VALUES (' ' 222-22-2222 ", June 1, 2011", 20);
  insert into secondary_table VALUES ('' 33-333-3333, January 1, 2011 ", 10);

  ========================================================================================

  Hello

  I created two very simple tables for this exercise. I don't know if I can do this with a simple query, or must use pl/sql.

  I want to join primary_table to secondary_table of NSSand the list of fields in the primary_table, but only if the join returns only a line.

  In other words, I would like to create a list of data primary_table for primary_table lines that have only one line on the secondary table.

  Concerning

  Something like...

  select p.
  from primary_table p
  where p.ssn in (select s.ssn from secondary_table s group by s.ssn having count(*) = 1)
  

• Problem with a simple query

  Hello, I'll start by saying that I am a noob. in any case, I'm trying to do what I thought was a simple query for records that are greater or equal to the date of the day: it's my request...

  < cfquery name = "getUpcoming" datasource = 'events' >
  SELECT title, eventDate FROM event WHERE eventDate > = #Now () # ORDER BY ASC eventDate
  < / cfquery >

  It works, so, I get the records that are greater than the current date, but all records that match to are not.

  I guess that it is looking at the time as well, or should I completely wrong. I do not know? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Good reading up on top of (http://help.adobe.com/en_US/ColdFusion/9.0/CFMLRef/WSc3ff6d0ea77859461172e0811cbec22c24-7f 6f.html), which you must use when you pass dynamic values to the DB, instead of hard-coding the in your SQL string.  And when using , use a param of CF_SQL_DATE type, and must ignore the time portion of the date/time value, you pass (I'm not 100% certain of this... only about 99% certain... but give it a go).  Or spend only the date part of the date/time value in the query.  Using createOdbcDate() fact, without all the extra horsing around adding things together and using the dateFormat() attribute as the previous poster suggested.

  --

  Adam

• Improve a simple query

  Here's a simple query, what I want to know, I added superior select d.name, which is the description of region_code for. Can I get a whole result with a single statement select
  
  SELECT t.region_code, d.name, t.emp_contr
  Of
  (SELECT c.br_region_fo_code as Region_Code,
  Sum (c.employer_contribution) AS emp_contr
  OF core_business.cb_contr_emp_pmt_slip c
  T GROUP BY c.br_region_fo_code),
  general_information.cb_region_fo d
  WHERE t.br_region_fo_code = d.region_fo_code;

  Try this:

  SELECT c.br_region_fo_code as Region_Code,
             d.name,
             SUM(c.employer_contribution) OVER(PARTITION BY  c.br_region_fo_code ORDER BY c.br_region_fo_code) AS emp_contr
  FROM   core_business.cb_contr_emp_pmt_slip c,
             general_information.cb_region_fo d
  WHERE
             c.br_region_fo_code = d.region_fo_code;
  

• Decode the simple query

  Decode the query
  Simplified version of the query below.
  
  SELECT
  d.REG,
  d.DP,
  c.CHANNEL
  Of
  CUSTOMER c,.
  ACCOUNT d
  WHERE c.ID = d.ID
  D.REG GROUP, d.DP, c.CHANNEL
  
  
  Channel field in the Customer Table contains several store ID (1 Store, tray 2, tray 3, store 4 etc.) - basically, I want to use decode on the channel field so that instead of all the store ID being issued what is fate of the channel are
  Store 1 = "big".
  Store 2 = 'average '.
  Store 3 = "Small".
  All other stores = 'other '.
  
  Where the decode to insert statement and what should be the format - attempt below
  DECODE (c.CHANNEL, "keep 1, 'Big', ' Store 2', 'Medium', 'Store' 3', small ', 'Other' ') of

  Hello

  This should be what you are looking for:

  SELECT   d.REG,
           d.DP,
           DECODE (c.CHANNEL, 'Store 1','Large', 'Store 2','Medium', 'Store 3','Small', 'Other') Channel
  FROM     CUSTOMER c,
           ACCOUNT d
  WHERE    c.ID = d.ID
  GROUP BY d.REG,
           d.DP,
           c.CHANNEL
  

  City where to move them in decoding...

• Simple query in Oracle Table in MS Access causes a full table scan.

  I run a very simple query in MS ACCESS to an Oracle table attached as follows:
  
  Select *.
  EXPRESS_SERVICE_EVENTS-(EXPRESS is the name of the related table. SERVICE_EVENTS)
  When executed > MyDate()
  
  or
  
  Select *.
  EXPRESS_SERVICE_EVENTS-(EXPRESS is the name of the related table. SERVICE_EVENTS)
  When executed > [Forms]! [MyForm]! [Date1]
  
  We have more than 50 machines and this query works well on more than half of them, using an Oracle Index on the field "run." Exactly the same thing running on other machines results in a full table scan, so regardless of the index (the DB access even access all machines).
  
  Strangely, if we write the query as follows:
  
  Select *.
  Of EXPRESS_SERVICE_EVENTS
  When executed > # 2009-09-04 08:00 #.
  
  It works fast everywhere!
  
  Any help with this "phenominon" would be appreciated.
  
  We did the things:
  Check the locale settings of the ODBC driver, MS Access settings (as in tools-> Options), we have the latest XP and Office service packs and re-related all the Access Tables on the slow and fast machines independently).

  All machines use the same version of the ODBC driver?

  If you have access to Metalink, check the following note:
  Note.257828.1 Scan of Table full Ext/Pub while seeking the DATE columns using the ODBC Oracle driver:

  In a Word, try "bind timestamp date" option in the dsn configuration and do not forget to update the links in the table.

  It will be useful,
  Greg

• simple query help :)

  I have table with date, customer number, salary... Now, I want to extract the total number of client whose salary is between 2000 and 3000 and deposited consistantly for the last 6 months.
  Can someone help me with this...

  user12183668 wrote:
  I used your query... its working well... but there are a few County for the date (NTC) which I am less than 6... .and I want to exclude these documents at the level of the query.

  How can I do this

  By encapsulating the query as an interior view, something in this way:

  select *
    from (
  select
   empno
  ,count(distinct trunc(hiredate,'MM')) cnt
  from emp
  where
  sal between 2000 and 3000
  and
  hiredate >= add_months (trunc(sysdate, 'MM'), -5 )
  group by empno
  ) a
  where a.cnt = 6;
  

• A simple query with as wrong return result

  Hello
  
  I run a simple query with like.
  If I use the parameter I get incorrect results.
  If I use the request without parameter results are ok.
  
  My script:
  
  ALTER SESSION SET NLS_SORT = BINARY_CI;
  ALTER SESSION SET NLS_COMP = LINGUISTIC;
  
  -drop table abcd;
  create table abcd (col1 varchar2 (10));
  
  INSERT INTO VALUES ABCD ('122222');
  insert into abcd values ('111222');
  
  
  SELECT * FROM ABCD WHERE COL1 LIKE: 1. -bad result with 12%
  /*
  COL1
  ----------
  122222
  * 111222 *.
  */
  
  "Select * ABCD where col1 like 12%; -result ok
  /*
  COL1
  ----------
  122222
  */
  
  I use Oracle Database 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64 bit Production
  and query, run in Oracle SQL Developer 3.1.07.

  I think it's just a bug, and it is set to 11.2.0.3:

  11.2.0.1:

  DB11.2.0.1>> select * from v$version where rownum=1;
  
  BANNER
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
  
  1 row selected.
  
  DB11.2.0.1>> ALTER SESSION SET NLS_SORT=BINARY_CI;
  
  Session altered.
  
  DB11.2.0.1>> ALTER SESSION SET NLS_COMP=LINGUISTIC;
  
  Session altered.
  
  DB11.2.0.1>> create table abcd (col1 varchar2(10));
  
  Table created.
  
  DB11.2.0.1>> INSERT INTO ABCD VALUES ('122222');
  
  1 row created.
  
  DB11.2.0.1>> insert into abcd values ('111222');
  
  1 row created.
  
  DB11.2.0.1>> VARIABLE A1 VARCHAR2(10);
  DB11.2.0.1>> EXEC :A1 := '12%';
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  
  DB11.2.0.1>> SELECT * FROM ABCD WHERE COL1 LIKE :A1;
  
  COL1
  ----------
  122222
  111222
  
  2 rows selected.
  

  11.2.0.3:

  DB11.2.0.3>> select * from v$version where rownum=1;
  
  BANNER
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
  
  1 row selected.
  
  DB11.2.0.3>> ALTER SESSION SET NLS_SORT=BINARY_CI;
  
  Session altered.
  
  DB11.2.0.3>> ALTER SESSION SET NLS_COMP=LINGUISTIC;
  
  Session altered.
  
  DB11.2.0.3>> create table abcd (col1 varchar2(10));
  
  Table created.
  
  DB11.2.0.3>> INSERT INTO ABCD VALUES ('122222');
  
  1 row created.
  
  DB11.2.0.3>> insert into abcd values ('111222');
  
  1 row created.
  
  DB11.2.0.3>> VARIABLE A1 VARCHAR2(10);
  DB11.2.0.3>> EXEC :A1 := '12%';
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  
  DB11.2.0.3>> SELECT * FROM ABCD WHERE COL1 LIKE :A1;
  
  COL1
  ----------
  122222
  
  1 row selected.
  

  Kind regards
  Sayan Malakshinov
  http://orasql.org

• This should be easy! How can I change the background color of my domains?

  My apologies if this has already been posted but nothing has developed by Google, nor the Forum search.

  I'm sure that this should be easy, but it really does my head!

  I have a number of text boxes, drop-down lists, etc. in my form - I put backgrounds customized to each that are visible in Design view. However, in the PDF preview all the fields have a blue color by default and don't change to my origins custom when you enter in the field.

  Is it possible to remove the coloring by defect in the fields while it's the same as my Custom background? My Custom backgrounds are "linear downstairs" so I don't want just the value one-colour border.fill.color.

  Thanks for any help,

  Hello

  If you include this Javascript in the node docReady event root (default ' form1').

  app.runtimeHighlight = false;
  

  This will stop the highlight of field. It does not prevent the user from back on the highest point, it means that your screen opens with the highlight off the coast.

  Hope that helps,

  Niall

  Ensure the dynamics

• Wat is the problem with this simple query?

  I use 10gxe.
  This is the query that does not work
  Whenever I'm him running a pop-up windows is coming
  and asks me to enter the bind variables... Should wat I do?
  Here's a question prntscrn.
  
  http://potupaul.webs.com/at.html
  
  
  G_message VARIABLE VARCHAR2 (30)
  BEGIN
  : g_message: = "Œuvres of My PL/SQL block;
  END;
  /
  G_message IMPRESSION
  
  Edited by: user4501184 may 18, 2010 12:42 AM

  use sqlplus 't's work' ng

  run
  cmd
  sqlplus / as sysdba
  G_message VARIABLE VARCHAR2 (30)
  BEGIN
  : g_message: = "Œuvres of My PL/SQL block;
  END;
  /
  G_message IMPRESSION

  hope this helps
  Daniele

• Cannot get this simple query!

  Hi guys,.
  
  There is this requirement easy to write a query that selects many columns in a table, but grouped on 3 columns in the same table.
  
  Table Str:
  C11 col2 col3 col4 col5 col6 col7 col8 col9 col10
  
  Mandatory:
  Group By: Col9, col10
  Columns to select: C11 col2 col3 col4 col5 col6 col7 col8
  
  I know there is something simple that I'm missing.
  
  any help will be appreciated.
  
  Thank you!

  Hello

  What produces the output you asked for the data that you have posted:

  SELECT       MIN (col1)
  ,       MIN (col2)
  ,       MIN (col3)
  ,       MIN (col4)
  ,       MIN (col5)
  ,       MIN (col6)
  ,       MIN (col7)
  ,       MIN (col8)
  ,       col9
  ,       col10
  FROM       str
  GROUP BY  col9
  ,       col10
  ;
  

  If the fact

  WITH     got_rnum     AS
  (
       SELECT  str.*
       ,     ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY  col9
                           ,             col10
                           ORDER BY        col1
                           ,             col2
                           ,             col3
                           ,             col4
                           ,             col5
                           ,             col6
                           ,             col7
                           ,             col8
                           )     AS rnum
       FROM     str
  )
  SELECT     col1
  ,     col2
  ,     col3
  ,     col4
  ,     col5
  ,     col6
  ,     col7
  ,     col8
  ,     col9
  ,     col10
  FROM     got_rnum
  WHERE     rnum     = 1
  ;
  

  With the sample data that you posted both queries produce the same results.
  With other data, both queries will produce different results.

• How to make the simple query for this scenario... ?

  Hello:
  
  Dummy table provided for simplicity.
  
  It's my database table (Table_A)
  
  Date1 | Plane1 | Category | Duration | Fees
  01/01/2011 | A | Gold | 5. 2
  01/01/2011 | C | Money | 4. 11
  01/01/2011 | B | Gold | 6. 2
  01/01/2011 | D | Gold | 2. 4
  01/01/2011 | B | Gold | 3. 5
  01/01/2011 | A | Money | 4. 8
  01/01/2011 | B | Gold | 1. 3
  
  I need to write a query to get the result below:
  
  Date1 | Plane1 | Sum_Duration | Sum_Charge | Sum_Gold_Duration | Sum_Gold_Charge | Sum_Silver_Duration | Sum_Silver_Charge
  01/01/2011 | A | 9. 10. 5. 2. 4. 8
  01/01/2011 | B | 10. 10. 10. 10. 0 | 0
  01/01/2011 | C | 4. 11. 0 | 0 | 4. 11
  01/01/2011 | D | 2. 4. 2. 4. 0 | 0
  
  This query will provide the 1st four columns:
  
  SELECT Date1,
  base1,
  Sum (Duration) Sum_Duration,
  Sum (load) Sum_Charge
  FROM TABLE_A
  GROUP BY date1, rarateplan
  
  But I need to know how to get the rest of the columns (i.e. Summary according to categories; from 5 to 8 columns)? Is this can be done in a single query without writing subqueries?
  
  Please let me know, (with code), the best way.
  
  Thank you-
  Tanvir

  Use like this:

  SELECT Date1,
  base1,
  Sum (Duration) Sum_Duration,
  Sum (load) Sum_Charge,
  SUM (decode(Category,'Gold',duration,0)) Sum_Gold_Duration,
  SUM (decode(Category,'Gold',charge,0)) Sum_Gold_charge,
  SUM (decode(Category,'Silver',duration,0)) Sum_Silver_Duration,
  SUM (decode(Category,'Silver',charge,0)) Sum_Silver_charge
  FROM TABLE_A
  GROUP BY date1, rarateplan

  Published by: SANT007 on August 11, 2011 11:04

• help me with this simple query

  Hi, I have reached the results by querying the table twice. so, how can I get the results by hitting the table only once.
  version 10g
  

  with t as 
  (select 100 parent , 1 child , 'Y' flag from dual union all
  select 100 parent , 2 child , 'N' flag from dual union all
  select 100 parent , 3 child , 'N' flag from dual union all
  select 100 parent , 4 child , 'N' flag from dual union all
  select 100 parent , 5 child , 'Y'  flag from dual union all
  select 100 parent , 6 child , 'N' flag from dual union all
  select 100 parent , 7 child , 'N' flag from dual union all
  select 100 parent , 8 child , 'Y' flag from dual union all
  select 100 parent , 9 child , 'N' flag from dual)
  select * from t where parent in ( 
  select parent from t
  where child = 1)
  and flag = 'N'
  order by child;

  Hello

  Here's one way:

  WITH     got_good_cnt     AS
  (
       SELECT     t.*
       ,     SUM (CASE WHEN child = 1 THEN 1 END)
                OVER (PARTITION BY  parent)          AS good_cnt
       FROM    t
  )
  SELECT       *     -- or list all columns except good_cnt
  FROM       got_good_cnt
  WHERE       good_cnt >= 1
  AND       flag        = 'N'
  ORDER BY  child
  ;
  

  The best way may depend on your data, for example, the columns that are unique.

  Each line in your sample data has the same value for parent. Is this the best game of test data?

• How to write this Simple query?

  Select * from student

  where

  (select count (first_name) of student) > 1;

  Basically I want a list of student table where the counties of first names are more than 1. However he shows me the output for

  Select * from student;

  any suggestions?

  Hello

  2776946 wrote:

  Select * from student

  where

  (select count (first_name) of student) > 1;

  Basically I want a list of student table where the counties of first names are more than 1. However he shows me the output for

  Select * from student;

  any suggestions?

  Think about it.  The subquery tells you the number of rows in all of the table have a first name.  It will always tell you the number of rows in all of the table name.  You don't want to know how many rows in the table have a name, you want to know how many rows in the table have the same name.

  One way to do is a correlated subquery:

  Select *.

  student m-m is for hand query

  where)

  SELECT count (*)

  student s-s is for the subquery

            where s.first_name = m.first_name

  )  > 1

  ;

• This should be simple...

  I'm working on a book cover, which is built on the model in the ID provided by the printer. In order to check my design, I create a PDF file and print on paper folding of the cover such that the book would be. The book is 6 x 9 "placed on the upper right of a 14 x 11 with landmarks of the printer model.

  I want to check the coverage of the design on one A4 (which obviously will not allow full propagation) sheet of the ID/PDF and have tried various printing options, but only get the wrong part of the lid.

  If everyone can visualize this, what could I try to do to print just the front (not back) cover of the present sheet oversized?

  Owen,

  Luca

  What I would do is export to PDF, which will automatically open in Acrobat, press C to activate the crop tool, drag around what I want to print, press on enter, then print it out.  Pretty fast once you're used to, I always export to PDF format in my work anyway.