Three blocks in the same way, belong to the same table

Similar Questions

• Building blocks in the reference table of contents page

  In the reference page for 8 FM to my OCD, I have this:

  < $chapnum >. < $paranum >: < $paratext > < $pagenum >

  The < $chapnum > section: < $paratext > < $pagenum >

  The < $chapnum > section: < $paratext > < $pagenum >

  After an update of the exit book TOC looks like this:

  Section 2: Concepts RTXLNET & characteristics

  Section 2: Organizing data

  2: day of the specifications

  Absent from the output is the second issue of the level of heading 3, for example the "." 1"in" 2.1: Date specifications. What is the correct Foundation? < $paranum > is apparently not correct.

  Thank you

  William

  <$paranumonly>gives you just the info of the meter.

  <$paranum>gives you everything in the AutoNumber field

• Boots only to the Startup Repair. Hardware diagnostics found bad blocks on the hard disk. is it possible to move data outside of Windows?

  Original title: Hi, I have a Dell Inspiron 1545 laptop.  Recently, he stopped working and would go only to the screen that asks if you want to run the Startup Repair tool.

  Of course whenever I launch it, it goes back to this screen.  Check the diagnostics through the F12 boot, I had three error codes: 0F00:1344, 0244 and 1 A 44.  These were all on the same three blocks.  The message was impossible to read, replace the drive.  I'm really the most responsible for recover my photos, documents, etc. and have an external hard drive.  Is it possible to do so, even if Windows (Vista in this case) will not start?

  Hello

  You can try these methods

  Data recovery

  1. remove the hard drive and it slave in another computer

  2 buy or borrow a USB disk drive hard put in yout case then plug it into another computer and read the hard drive like this

  3. try Knoppix

  http://www.Knopper.NET/Knoppix/index-en.html

  BUT this method depends on your hardware in the computer that failed

  If this does not work, you may need to contact the data recovery specialists

• Repeat all the page tables

  I have four tables in the model.
  
  I want to display the first three pages and the fourth table (which also has lines of repeatng) to be displayed after three early paintings.
  
  I don't want to use the concept of the header.
  
  This is possible.
  
  AJ

  Send me the model to [email protected] and I'll take a look.

  Thank you!

• three loops in the same VI

  Hello

  I have three loops that run in the same VI. The first loop gain using fifo control data (we call it a loop of producer) and the other receive data from producer loop and save it to a TDMS file. While the last of them acquire loged the TDMS file data and display it on the graph

  My data is backed up to the TDMS file, but this is not shown on the grahe.

  I was wondering if the data are not displayed because the Labview does not turn three loops on the same time or cause I made a mistake in the third loop.

  Thanks in advance for reply

  My best regards

  PS: Please find attached the VI

  First, use a real queue to pass data from your Director to your consumption.  There is no need to put awaits your consumption.  The dequeue will limit the rate of the loop.

  Then put the graph in your loop of producer.  It will save you so much headarches.

• I look integrated in the block of the legend of slide show, a widget like "Accordion" for, with one click, or by the way with the mouse, open a new caption for each photo. I tried with 'Accordion' Muse, it does not work. I haven't tried to copy and paste,

  Issue.

  I look integrated in the block of the legend of slide show, a widget like "Accordion" for, with one click, or by the way with the mouse, open a new caption for each photo. I tried with 'Accordion' Muse, it does not work. I haven't tried to copy and paste, but no result. The widget disappear into the legend of block. disappear. Do you have a solution?

  Thank you

  Loïc

  Accordion Panel tabs should, with click and open the container.

  Please provide the url of the site where it does not, also if you can provide an example where we can see the exact action, then it would help us.

  Thank you

  Sanjit

• Several blocks of the same canvas and window update

  Hi all
  
  I want to update several blocks from the same canvas and the window. I also want to find an alert before saving the data. Based on the current record, I want to update only
  data in the record.
  
  Can you help me anyone in this regard.
  
  Arif

  You must write the validation key trigger to the block level

  I don't think so. As it is not possible to hire only a single block, what would be the use of a KEY VALIDATION trigger at the level of the block? The only effect would be that the shape has according to different where the cursor is positioned.

  If you want the dynamic Blockname (and all blocks of share the same fields that you are filling), you can do something like

  if show_alert('ALERT_TO_VERIFY')=alert_button1 then
    COPY('3', :SYSTEM.TRIGGER_BLOCK || '.REC_STATUS');
    COPY('P', :SYSTEM.TRIGGER_BLOCK || '.TASK_STATUS');
    COPY('P', :SYSTEM.TRIGGER_BLOCK || '.PERMISSION_UPDATED');
    commit_form;
    execute_query;
  end if;
  

  BTW... Why is - that update you the block after commit?

• Two blocks using the same Web

  I'm working on a program of forms for some users will be investigation only table X, but others will be able to update not all but some of them, most delete records, but not insert.
  The new form a trigger will focus on the user account, then go_block to (survey only) Block1 or Block2 (authorized update).
  The two blocks contain the same elements, but the properties are different. Both are set to the same canvas.
  __
  In the canvas, both sets of fields are super imposed on the other. How to trigger
  User survey: visable Block1, Block2 not
  User update: visable Block2, block 1, no?
  __
  I could have separate canvases, but I thought that it would save some time if I only had to maintain a.
  __
  Thank you
  Sandy

  WHEN_NEW_FORM_INSTANCE fires when you open the form (after the opening session, but before the block operations, as the query).
  in a block of several ranks, the integrated SET_ITEM_PROPERTY changes the properties of all the elements (all recordings), SET_ITEM_INSTANCE_PROPERTY for a single element of a defined line.
  Maybe it is enough to change the properties of a block like this:

  IF USER = 'A' THEN
      SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY('A', INSERT_ALLOWED, PROPERTY_FALSE);
      SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY('A', UPDATE_ALLOWED, PROPERTY_FALSE);
      SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY('A', DELETE_ALLOWED, PROPERTY_FALSE);
  ELSE
      SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY('A', INSERT_ALLOWED, PROPERTY_TRUE);
      SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY('A', UPDATE_ALLOWED, PROPERTY_TRUE);
      SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY('A', DELETE_ALLOWED, PROPERTY_TRUE);
  END IF;
  

• FRM - 40202:Field must be entered on two blocks with the same table

  I have two blocks, blockA and blockB, both from the same table that is tableX.
  
  When I ask of blockA and it worked, then I go to blockB and modify data, and save, there is no problem. But when I do not run the query of blockA or if the query did not return any results, I go to blockB and change some data then save, I got this error. The cursor then go to first blockA point. So now, I have to delete this empty line before the Save.
  
  
  Any suggestion?

  you set a few initial values programmatically for a block?
  in this case, the status changes to INSERT and you will get this message.
  You can check the staus with GET_RECORD_PROPERTY (1, "A BLOCK", STATUS), e.g. with the trigger KEY-COMMIT.

• 2 blocks from the database data insert into the same base table?

  Hello
  I have the C_NEW canvas. On this canvas, elements of 3 blocks are usable by the user.
  
  1 block NEW_HEAD: 3 Articles say X 1, X 2, X 3
  2 block NEW: record multi say Y1 thru Y10 text fields. Also a scroll bar.
  3 block NEW_ACTION: 6 buttons say B1 to B6 (one of them is N_OK which matches the element in question)
  
  two NEW, NEW_HEAD blocks are blocks of db and have the same basic so-called BT table when users click on the N_OK (after filling the data in the NEW_HEAD and then NEW block in that order), I need the data between the two the NEW, NEW_HEAD to enter the BT. currently only the NEW data goes to BT. in the BT table fields that correspond to the fields X 1, X 2, X 3 in the NEW_HEAD remains null after clicking on the N_OK button. I put commit_form in the N_OK code, since the blocks are blocks of db (as suggested by the people, it is easier to issue a commit_form that a lot more work in writing my own SQL).
  
  How can I achieve this?
  
  Thank you
  Chiru

  There is therefore no N_LC_DMG_ALLOW column in the table, that the block is the result. You must set the property "Section of the database" not for all the elements that are not of the columns in your database table.

  And when an error occurs, then the full treatment stops, so its clear that there is no inserted record.

• Blocking of the appellant 'unknown '.

  I get at least three calls a day from the appellants 'unknown '.  I don't touch my phone when these calls come, because I suspect there is some malware attached when the call is answered or if I responded in kind.  I just let it ring until the call is abandoned.  These calls come with no number, so there is nothing to block in the current Apple 6 implemented.

  Y at - it an app that can track these until Apple developed the code that will allow users to block calls?

  There is no way to attach any malware to a phone call, but it is probably marketing or crook calls.

  Check with the carrier service provider. Some offer a way to block unknown callears before it happens even on your phone.

• Why doesn't Java Deployment Toolkit (click-to-play) is blocked, as the referenced bug is closed and there is no security problem not known in Version 7 U51?

  In my view, it is important to block insecure addons. But if you do it should be an open bug assigened. The bug referenced to this add-on is already resolved, so I do not know why this plugin is disabled. https://Bugzilla.Mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636633

  I have the problem that I want to use Secure_Auth that uses the Deployment Kit Java of nasty (via javascript) way that firefox does not see the deployment kit must be started. This is why I have not expected this plugin still for this web site. Since there is no available documentation how to do this configuration in a config file that I'm stuck at the moment.

  I'm a little surprised liitle which blocks all versions (same secure versions) is a way to get a good user experience.

  Concerning

  Martin

  MG_DAU,

  Why do you think that the problem is caused by the block of Java Deployment Toolkit, not Java itself? See http://www.java.com/en/download/faq/deployment_toolkit.xml and this document I found with a google search:

  • Oracle Java blocking the Java Applet of SecureAuth due unsigned Java components

  For general information on the use of Java on trusted sites, see:

  • How to allow Java on trusted sites
  • The Java plugin to view interactive content on Web sites

• Insert data into the same table based on certain conditions

  Hello. I'm new to this forum.
  I have to write a stored procedure to insert data in a table MYTABLE say, having a structure like:
  
  Col1 Col2 Col3... TotalInstallments CurrentInstallment PaidAmount MonthYear
  I have to insert all the data that it is in the same table (MYTABLE) except change some fields based on certain conditions:
  
  1. if PaidAmount > 0 & & CurrentInstallment < TotalInstallment then
  
  CurrentInstallment = CurrentInstallment + 1
  
  2. in the field MonthYear I have data ex. 01/2012, 11/2012 formate(month/year)...
  
  So, I have to insert data by incrementing the month and year. for example:
  
  If currentdata is 11/2012 next data will be 12/2012
  
  But following will be 01, 2013
  I have to select all records that belongs to the previous month (across the field MonthYear) and put the audit on each record selected and insert data and then turns them into table (MYTABLE) even.
  
  How to achieve that?
  
  Thank you.

  978184 wrote:
  Hello. I'm new to this forum.
  I have to write a stored procedure to insert data in a table MYTABLE say, having a structure like:

  Col1 Col2 Col3... TotalInstallments CurrentInstallment PaidAmount MonthYear
  I have to insert all the data that it is in the same table (MYTABLE) except change some fields based on certain conditions:

  1. if PaidAmount > 0 & CurrentInstallment

  CurrentInstallment = CurrentInstallment + 1

  2. in the field MonthYear I have data ex. 01/2012, 11/2012 formate(month/year)...

  So, I have to insert data by incrementing the month and year. for example:

  If currentdata is 11/2012 next data will be 12/2012

  But following will be 01, 2013
  I have to select all records that belongs to the previous month (across the field MonthYear) and put the audit & on each of the selected data record and insert then turns them into table (MYTABLE).

  You can do this way:

  This is not tested, but if you can provide the example of table structure and data (IN create table and insert scripts), it can be put to the test.

  insert into your_table
  (col1, col2, col3...current_installment, month_field)
  select col1, col2, col3..,
         current_installment +
         case when paidamount > 0 and current_installment < total_installment then
          row_number() over (
                              partition by column1, column2,.. columnn      -->You may choose partition if you want the
                                                                            --Increment of Current_installment to reset after particular combination ends
                              order by primary_key        -->Order the Increment, you may choose to add more columns to order by
                            )
        else
          0                                               --> if condition is not met, then Add 0
        end curr_installment,
        add_months(to_date(month_field, 'MM/YYYY'), 1) nxt_month
    from your_table;
  

• 2 forms to modify the same table at the same time

  I have a block record multi and now we add more fields to the table. I thought I had
  users press a button for a specific record in the block and then he would open another form (or something like that)
  to set up a regular shape where they may enter these details).
  But then I think two forms at the same time, changing the same table is going to be a problem.
  right?
  Is there a way to do what I want? I want the user to choose and to be able to change some things of 'a grid.
  aka multi-record block and then be able to go to a non tabular entry in the details form. Is it possible to do?

  then he would open another form (or something like that)

  Could be another form, or just another block in a different window/canvas or even field in the same block using 'Reflect the elements' ('synchronize with' - property)

  But then I think two forms at the same time, changing the same table is going to be a problem.

  Not necessarily. If you use CALL_FORM or OPEN_FORM without having to open a new session it is no problem to do so. You just check that the modifications of the form "first" are recorded or posted at least before opening detailed form.

• Blocker withdraws the deadlock trace file (self)

  Hello
  
  Recently, I had a problem on a 10.2.0.4 database to single instance where blockages are produced. The following test case reproduced the problem (I create three tables parent, a child table with foreign keys indexed to all parents three tables and a procedure that performs an insert in the child table in a standalone transaction):
  

  create table parent_1(id number primary key);
  
  create table parent_2(id number primary key);
  
  create table parent_3(id number primary key);
   
  create table child( id_c number primary key,
                     id_p1 number,
                     id_p2 number,
                     id_p3 number,
                     constraint fk_id_p1 foreign key (id_p1) references parent_1(id),
                     constraint fk_id_p2 foreign key (id_p2) references parent_2(id),
                     constraint fk_id_p3 foreign key (id_p3) references parent_3(id)
                     );
   
  create index i_id_p1 on child(id_p1);
  
  create index i_id_p2 on child(id_p2);
  
  create index i_id_p3 on child(id_p3);
  
  create or replace procedure insert_into_child as
  pragma autonomous_transaction;
  begin
    insert into child(id_c, id_p1, id_p2, id_p3) values(1,1,1,1);
    commit;
  end;
  /
   
  insert into parent_1 values(1);
  
  insert into parent_2 values(1);
  
  commit;

  And now the action that causes the deadlock:

  SQL> insert into parent_3 values(1);
  
  1 row created.
  
  SQL> exec insert_into_child;
  BEGIN insert_into_child; END;
  
  *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource
  ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.INSERT_INTO_CHILD", line 4
  ORA-06512: at line 1

  My question is: How can I determine which integration into the CHILD table waiting for? He could wait on a combination of these, PARENT_3, PARENT_2, PARENT_1, or even on the CHILD if I tried to insert a primary key that is duplicated in the CHILD. Since we have the full test case, we know that he was waiting on PARENT_3 (or better said, he expected to perform a commit / rollback of the transaction 'parent'), but is it possible to determine that only from the deadlock trace file? I ask that because to identify the problem, I had to perform redo log mining, tracing pl/sql with DBMS_TRACE and manual debugging on a clone of the production database that has been restored to a SNA just before blocking is product. So, I had to do a lot of work to get to the trainer table and if this information is already in the deadlock trace file, it would have saved me a lot of time.
  
  Here is the deadlock trace file. In section "DML LOCK", I assumed that the child table (tab = 227042) holds a 3 way locks (SX), all other tables of three parents have a mode 2 locks (SS), but from this excerpt, I see that parent_3 (tab = 227040) blocks the children insert:
  

  Deadlock graph:
                         ---------Blocker(s)--------  ---------Waiter(s)---------
  Resource Name          process session holds waits  process session holds waits
  TX-00070029-00749150        23     476     X             23     476           S
  session 476: DID 0001-0017-00000003     session 476: DID 0001-0017-00000003
  Rows waited on:
  Session 476: obj - rowid = 000376E2 - AAA3biAAEAAA4BwAAA
    (dictionary objn - 227042, file - 4, block - 229488, slot - 0)
  Information on the OTHER waiting sessions:
  End of information on OTHER waiting sessions.
  Current SQL statement for this session:
  INSERT INTO CHILD(ID_C, ID_P1, ID_P2, ID_P3) VALUES(1,1,1,1)
  ----- PL/SQL Call Stack -----
    object      line  object
    handle    number  name
  3989eef50         4  procedure SCOTT.INSERT_INTO_CHILD
  391f3d870         1  anonymous block
  .
  .
  .
  .
          SO: 397691978, type: 36, owner: 39686af98, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00
          DML LOCK: tab=227042 flg=11 chi=0
                    his[0]: mod=3 spn=35288
          (enqueue) TM-000376E2-00000000  DID: 0001-0017-00000003
          lv: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  res_flag: 0x6
          res: 0x398341fe8, mode: SX, lock_flag: 0x0
          own: 0x3980df420, sess: 0x3980df420, proc: 0x39859c660, prv: 0x398341ff8
          ----------------------------------------
          SO: 397691878, type: 36, owner: 39686af98, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00
          DML LOCK: tab=227040 flg=11 chi=0
                    his[0]: mod=2 spn=35288
          (enqueue) TM-000376E0-00000000  DID: 0001-0017-00000003
          lv: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  res_flag: 0x6
          res: 0x3983386e8, mode: SS, lock_flag: 0x0
          own: 0x3980df420, sess: 0x3980df420, proc: 0x39859c660, prv: 0x3983386f8
          ----------------------------------------
          SO: 397691778, type: 36, owner: 39686af98, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00
          DML LOCK: tab=227038 flg=11 chi=0
                    his[0]: mod=2 spn=35288
          (enqueue) TM-000376DE-00000000  DID: 0001-0017-00000003
          lv: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  res_flag: 0x6
          res: 0x398340f58, mode: SS, lock_flag: 0x0
          own: 0x3980df420, sess: 0x3980df420, proc: 0x39859c660, prv: 0x398340f68
          ----------------------------------------
          SO: 397691678, type: 36, owner: 39686af98, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00
          DML LOCK: tab=227036 flg=11 chi=0
                    his[0]: mod=2 spn=35288
          (enqueue) TM-000376DC-00000000  DID: 0001-0017-00000003
          lv: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  res_flag: 0x6
          res: 0x39833f358, mode: SS, lock_flag: 0x0
          own: 0x3980df420, sess: 0x3980df420, proc: 0x39859c660, prv: 0x39833f368
        ----------------------------------------

  Thanks in advance for your comments,
  Swear

  user633661 wrote:

  My question is: How can I determine which integration into the CHILD table waiting for? He could wait on a combination of these, PARENT_3, PARENT_2, PARENT_1, or even on the CHILD if I tried to insert a primary key that is duplicated in the CHILD. Since we have the full test case, we know that he was waiting on PARENT_3 (or better said, he expected to perform a commit / rollback of the transaction 'parent'), but is it possible to determine that only from the deadlock trace file?

  There is no way to get the answer from the deadlock trace.

  At this stage and with your example, the waiting session waits for a lock of the TX (transaction) - this means that he has no idea (and uninteresting) in the involved actual data, that it is simply waiting for a location of transaction undo segment header table clear.

  An easy way to demonstrate, it is as follows:-
  

  
  create the parent and child tables with the activated FK constraint
  Session 1 - set a save point, then insert line into parent but do not commit
  Session 2 - insert a load line in the child - the session will pass a waiting for TX lock on the parent transaction
  Session 1-restoration to the point of backup
  

  Because restoration is a save point, session 1 always held a TX lock in exclusive mode, even if it will take is more all lock TM (table).
  Session 2 will still wait for session 1 to commit or rollback - even if the parent required row does not exist, even in a State that is not validated.

  Concerning
  Jonathan Lewis
  http://jonathanlewis.WordPress.com
  Author: core Oracle