Too many photos in the catalog?

Similar Questions

• Is it possible to prevent or remedy to have too many files in the DCIM folder?

  Is it possible to prevent or remedy to have too many files in the DCIM folder?  In a group of friends, when you view folders DCIM iPhone in Windows 8, three of us have many, many files (such as 101APPLE, 327APPLE, 328APPLE).  Phones concerned: 5 c, 6: 6.  Some have only one photo per file, some files have just a few pictures.  In addition, two friends have files dated 1969.  I think everyone has the most current ioS. What is the cause and is at - it a way to overcome it?

  No, it isn't. The DCIM and its content was never for public use to shoot photos and videos.

  Here's the right way to go about it.

  Import photos and videos from your iPhone, iPad or iPod touch - Apple Support

  If you want something more specific Windows, I suggest you watch here.

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-8/import-photos-videos

• "The file... is associated with another photo in the catalog" problem

  I have about 300 000 images stored on a disk in Drobo. Due to a hardware problem with the Drobo itself, I had get a new Drobo. I placed my old drives inside the new unit and everything appeared fine in the Finder. But in LR, everything happens with the "...". the original file is not found. "When I try to locate and correct the association I get, 'the file... is associated with another photo in the catalog. Each file can be associated with a picture. "There are not many copies. How can I solve this problem? Thank you.

  Are the files in the same place exactly as they were before your accident of drobo? i.e. the volume is a not the structure exact same name and folder? If Yes, you shouldn't have to re-associate the files and you should be able to double-click on an image and Lightroom it true already knows where is the image. If it isn't, you may need to stop Lightroom, disassemble the drive and reassemble and then open Lightroom again. I saw Lightroom being very slow to recognize the disk he thought no was not available was in fact already mounted.

• Too many problems with the latest version of Lightroom

  Hi all

  I have too many problems with the latest version of Lightroom (CC 2015.2.1 1046594)

  In fact, the latest version of 3 or 4 were bad: instead of doing better, I always had more problems.

  So I would like to go back to a previous version of lightroom

  Adobe customar care, in Italy, is unnecessary:

  they can just to:

  -looking for answer on this forum

  -saying "you solve your problems just with the de-insall and re-install it.

  stop, no more...

  in this way they create me a lot fo iusses...

  I use the English version of the PS and LR, but they made me reinstall the Italian version of CC because it has been blocked

  the result was that CC does not recognize software, due to a different language version

  so, I contacted again Adobe Customer Care... they said "no problem, uninstall LR, delete these files and install this...

  I did and I let go 2 years to develop the parameters on the correction of the colors for my clients because they told me to remove a folder, I need!

  so, I ask you now if there is a way to return to a previous version of lightroom, any previous version...

  I never found better performance in more recent versions...

  I've always found, performance slower, more problems...

  personal idea: I do not understand why adobe are boicotting itself, but I think he do!

  Thanks to you all

  Hi ramontillo,

  6.3/CC 2015.3 Lightroom is now available - try to update to this version which includes the previous import feature, bug fixes and new support for photo/target device profile: Lightroom CC 2015.3 / 6.3 now available

  Concerning

  Pete

• I use Lightroom 4.4 on windows 8. Less than 500 photos on the catalog and the catalog size is currently at 2.16 GB. Lightroom works fine, but I'm taking a risk by leaving the catalog to grow beyond 2 GB?

  I use Lightroom 4.4 on windows 8. If I have less than 500 photos on the catalog, I do a lot of alterations and cleaning of the images and therefore the size of the catalogue is currently at 2.16 GB. Lightroom works fine, but I'm taking a risk by leaving the catalog to grow beyond 2 GB? Should I close it and start a new catalog? Thanks for your suggestions.

  Many local adjustments (brush strokes, spot healing) can have a huge impact on the overall size of the catalog because they are all saved as stages of the individual history and so I wouldn't worry - there is nothing wrong with your catalog. See my thread here since a few years back: which affects the size of the Lightroom catalog file? where Rob Cole usefully thought of it for me.

  You could delete the history if you wanted and that I'd be willing to bet that the size would be reduced considerably. That said, my catalog file is larger than 10 GB (as I do a lot of local changes as stated in the thread I linked to) and it causes no problem at all, apart from resulting in a backup of slow catalogue (my previews resume another 30 GB or more). I have not yet felt the need for the history of the Reformation, but doing so probably would increase my catalog to about 1 GB, so it's an option if size becomes a problem for me.

  My advice: continue anyway and don't worry in this regard.

  M

• Acquisition of images with 3 USB cameras causing too many uses of the memory/cpu

  Dear experts,

  I'm trying to capture images with 3 cameras USB, located in 3 different positions. I have to initialize each cameras using USB list vi camera when switching between cameras. I realize that, by making this method causing too many uses of the memory/cpu and can cause CPU hang up. If I stop the program, the memory/cpu counter are down.

  Do you know how to reduce this problem.

  Thank you

  Hart

  
  

• Houston-25013: too many objects match the [primary key Lookup.USR_PROCESS_TRIGGERS USR_EMP_TYPE] oracle.jbo.Key.

  Hello

  I am trying to open the Console of the IOM of Sysadmin,

  try checking the research,

  search specific "Lookup.USR_PROCESS_TRIGGERS".

  and get the error on the screen

  Houston-25013: too many objects match the [primary key Lookup.USR_PROCESS_TRIGGERS USR_EMP_TYPE] oracle.jbo.Key.

  This known issue?

  This patch it for it?

  tried searching discussion forums, nothing here

  Thank you

  Check from the console design.  Looks like you have a duplicate key Code value.

  -Kevin

• message error "the file is associated with another photo in the catalog.

  CC of LR, windows, photos on external hard drive

  Files that I was still using yesterday now are more connected to the catalog.  Try to locate the files I get the message "the file is associated with another photo in the catalog. How can I find and solve.

  Thank you

  This is because this same image, same time date and time of the device, is already in the catalog using a different file name.

  Conversely having not happening again is to STOP Renaming files on import or manually in the file manager or with another image, software.

  Each camera has a system that can be customized if necessary if you have 2 cameras of the same brand and model of separate file naming. And even then, they are separated by the serial number of each camera.

• I'm 7 days in LR to the trial. After creation and 'use' to develop to edit 6 catalogues, I find without changing this or that all catalogs when opening, now have a bright red nail in different areas of the photos in the catalog. Some of the

  I'm 7 days in LR to the trial. After creation and 'use' to develop to edit 6 catalogues, I find without changing this or that all catalogs when opening, now have a bright red nail in different areas of the photos in the catalog. Some of the catalogues have been created several days ago and were considered OK, but now this 'red' hue appeared in all the catalogues without any intervention by me.

  I don't know why you create several different catalogs. Lightroom is managed much more efficiently using a single catalog. But regardless of this issue, it seems that if you have enabled clipping indicators. Pressing the J button makes the point high and indicators on shadow clipping or out of service. Or you can click on the small square in the upper corners of the histogram. Clicking the square to the left turns clipping shadow power. Clicking the square to the right will turn point highlight clipping power. I leave switched indicators so that I can identify areas that need to be adjusted so that I can eliminate all clipping.

• Too many objects match the [2044 primary key] oracle.jbo.Key. ;

  When I try to use the Accounting Setup Manager Wizard, I get an empty error message and when I click once again, I get the following exception:
  
  Application: DNF, Message name: FND_GENERIC_MESSAGE. Chips: MESSAGE = oracle.jbo.TooManyObjectsException: Houston-25013: too many objects correspond to the oracle.jbo.Key [2044 primary key]. ;
  
  
  Any ideas?
  
  P.S. I did all my storage spaces, CanGrow, I chose a method of accounting, and I checked to make sure my balance field has a valid value defined.
  
  EDIT: I made a new calendar and it worked. Sorry for the question as "stupid". It's a pretty stupid error if, in my defense
  
  Published by: ASCI Sep 21, 2012 11:32

  Please see these documents.

  R12: Accounting Setup Manager errors with Houston-25013 too many objects Match The Primary Key oracle.jbo.Key [604784.1 ID]
  Accountant Assistant with Exception Houston-25013 [ID 1276858.1] Setup Manager
  General Ledger FAQ for Accounting Assistant Setup Manager (ASM) [ID 778826.1]
  Houston-25013: too many objects correspond to the primary key [730055.1 ID] oracle.jbo.Key
  How to create a book of model with minimal GL installation for the installation of the Agency? [1300365.1 ID]

  Thank you
  Hussein

• File is associated with another photo in the catalog?

  Hi all

  I got LR4 running on a laptop computer and an external hard drive to store my images. I bought an imac and upgraded to 5. I also bought a new large external hard drive and copied all my images on the new drive.

  I created a new catalog and began importing images and everything was fine. Then I wanted to work on an old image and couldn't find it so plugged the old hard drive and there's DNG format.

  Now, I'm back on the mac, and most of my catalog went gray. I and exclamation mark in the corner! the nail of the thumb. It says it cannot locate the file. If I found the file nothing happens, so I try once Mithraeum locating in exactly in the same place and this time it says the file is associated with another photo in the catalog?

  My a few catalogs are a mess, I know. I don't really understand the whole import/DNG/catalog file, storage system. So I watched a tutorial on a combination of catalogs I want just one master, used on my mac, stored on my drive. So, I created a master and used catalog "import from another catalog. I've lived and all imported, so all of my images are in the new catalogue, but most of the images is still grey!

  I used the thought of plugin of duplicates which could clean it upward, but no, still the same.

  I worked on that a lot of my DNG files are on my old drive in a TEMP folder. I have to sort, move them to my new hardrive and bind them to the images? In addition, to solve the problem together "associated with another photo in the catalog.

  Then I can remove the old catalogs (such as a backup has been configured on an another new disc!) and I'm all clean and go back to sleep!

  Any help will be much appreciated and I hope to end my life of youtube tutorials!

  Thanks Mark.

  Mark, take a look at this point by Julianne Kost.

• Drop-down list invites 'TOO MANY VALUES' from the list

  I did a dashboard quickly with a list box down and I'm getting "too many values at the end of the fall to the bottom of the list box.
  
  I want that all the values to display.
  
  Anyone has a solution, thanks
  
  I saw in the FAQ about the instanceconfig.xml file and the tag
  
  value of < guests > < MaxDropDownValues > you must < / MaxDropDownValues > < / guest >
  
  But I did not work for me, I use the KISS we and not POET...
  
  Published by: Jim Nolette on June 4, 2010 09:07

  You've restarted services? and location also tags important, it should be inside tags serverinstance.

• Paradigm of photo storage? (too many Go to the new computer)

  Summary:

  I'm at the point of having to upgrade and get a new iMac for me.  Most of them have not nearly enough storage space for my photos/videos stored in the pictures.  I'm looking for advice in planning to implement a new "main" computer for the home/host Photos that will work for me. I know I maybe need to update my paradigm of Setup to get the best solution (had to do to get photos for devices of the family and now that I thought about it, it works very well!).

  Details:

  My current main computer is a big iMac 2009. With a 1 TB drive - who doesn't have 2 - 3 years. Replaced by a 2 TB drive (Seagate) which lasted a whole year and failed.  Replaced by a 3 TB drive (I think it's a Western?) which works very well... so far.  I have Time Machine backups on a dedicated (3 TB) external drive, so it took a lot of getting up and running when it happened, fortunately.  I did the physical replacement of the disks myself without incident.

  My current photo library says it's 708GB in size. Library.photolibrary of iPhoto is 558 GB (I can do without it?).  In my storage of 'about this Mac' tab he said films take 609GB, and take some Photos 379 GB. "Free of 2.79 to 1.18 TB."

  I've considered using iCloud, but I can't currently feel like I can afford $ 120 / year for storage...  Amazon has unlimited storage for $60 / year, but I'm not wanting something that do not integrate well (even if I am slightly consider it for a backup option).

  These are all our personal digital photos/videos for the past 14 years and no, I'm really not to split the library and not have everything at my fingertips... In addition, I want that they all in an accessible digital format for now.

  My ideas:

  I could buy a new iMac or slightly used and replace the hard drive with a bigger drive (not sure how friendly models current are for that!) and as I have.

  I could get the new iMac and keep an external drive running with the storage of Photos on it. But then I have questions on it being backed up with Time Machine.

  What else is there to implement I think not?  Are there other aspects that I think not?

  My current photo library says it's 708GB in size. Library.photolibrary of iPhoto is 558 GB (I can do without it?)

  If you don't use iPhoto, you can delete the iPhoto library but you don't get the whole GB 558.  The two libraries share the same data on the HDD through hard links initially so that they only take twice the amount of space on the hard disk.

  New photos added to each library are independent of the other library.

  Here is more information about hard links:

  Photos saves disk space to share images with your iPhoto or Aperture - Apple Support libraries

  The (hard) link between Photos and iPhoto

  I've considered using iCloud, but I can't currently feel like I can afford $ 120 / year for storage...  Amazon has unlimited storage for $60 / year

  The iCloud is not a storage system off Mac where you can put your library of PHotos and the operator there from there.  It's a synchronization system that allows you to synchronize your photos between all devices that are connected to the same Apple ID and the active library iCloud.  You may have the option for the version store only optimized on your Mac to save space.  However, the full versions will have to be downloaded any time, that the pictures are needed for printing, in a project or for a slide show.

  All iCloud options are features of synchronization and require files to be obscured on Mac.

  iCloud Photo library FAQ - Apple Support

  iCloud Drive FAQ - Apple Support

  Also there is no option of storage online library of Photos that can be stored on and used or recovered in a guaranteed condition.  Their servers are not correctly formatted and are incompatible with the libraries of Photos.

  I could get the new iMac and keep an external drive running with the storage of Photos on it. But then I have questions on it being backed up with Time Machine.

  This is the solution that I would recommend.  Time Machine backs up any external hard drive connected to your iMac. I have 2 EHD connected to my iMac that is backed up to my 3rd DHM with Time Machine.

  For best performance, I'd get an iMac with an internal SSD and at least 8 GB of memory.  If you get the iMac to get Apple just RAM standard because you can update yourself much less expensive by getting the modules from Crucial.com or otherworldcomputing.com.  Be aware, however, that several iMac 21 "cannot have their RAM added after purchase. They are not updated in the user level.   All the iMac 27 "have expandable RAM user.

  If you buy an iMac opportunity do not forget the former owner has prepared according to this document from Apple: what to do before you sell or give away your Mac - Apple Support. Otherwise, you could get the problems of implementation for your use.

  

• On sending a message, the server sent a wrong message: #4.4.5. too many connections to the host

  On sending a message, an error has occurred "the mail server has sent a wrong message: #4.4.5 too many connections to this host..."
  The mail is displayed as sent in envoys, but is not received by the recipient. On sending several messages to test myself this fault seems to be intermittent.

  Hmm did you get mail outbound scanning performed by an anti virus program? Turn the power off.

  Have the e-mail account on your phone? try turning off your phone.

  Is the IMAP or POP account?

• Why firefox causes 429 block too many applications on the Vimeo site?

  When I try to visit vimeo.com with Firefox (version 37.0) I get a message block server called 429 too many requests. However, I can then use another browser (Konqueror - provided with my Fedora KDE plasma system [fc21]) to access the site without problem.
  I tried to clear the cookies and the cache of Firefox and running in safe mode with all add-ons disabled, but he always brings the 429 error message.
  I'm puzzled. Any advice?

  You can delete all data stored in Firefox with a specific area through "Forget this Site" in the context menu of a history entry ("" history > view history "or" view > sidebar > History "") or via the subject: permissions page.

  Using "Forget this Site" will delete all data stored in Firefox in this area as bookmarks, cookies, words of past, cache, history, and exceptions, so be careful and if you have a password or other data from that domain you don't want to lose then check that back up these data or make a comment.

  You can't recover from this "forget" unless you have a backup of the files involved.

  It has no lasting effect, so if come back you on such a 'forgotten' site, then the data of this Web site will be saved once more.

  Create a new profile as a test to see if your profile is the source of the problem.

  See "create a profile":

  • https://support.Mozilla.org/KB/Profile-Manager-create-and-remove-Firefox-profiles
  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/Standard_diagnostic_-_Firefox#Profile_issues

  If the new profile works then you can transfer files from a profile already used in the new profile, but be careful not to copy files corrupted to avoid transporting more problems.

  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/Transferring_data_to_a_new_profile_-_Firefox