Toshiba Tecra M2 - very slow performance
Hello
During the last quarter of 2004, we invested on two Toshiba Tecra M2 with Windows XP SP2 and standard generation of Tosh.
In addition, laptops are configured for our use and loaded with the following software:
* MS Office 2003
* Autocad 2002
* Photoshop CS
Configured for our use and now affected by a shift of noticeble during the task execution when:
* opening closing documents MS Office 2003 Pro power switch of the network)
* create opening files and of new designs/plot in Autocad 2002 (with the latest service packs and patches loaded)
* loading Photoshop CS and various applications.
Because of the date of purchase of these laptops, we were informed by our reseller, we cannot return these items. Now, we're certainly stuck with them, but I need to find a solution as to why they are slow in performance, fix it right and lie to my peers.
Thanks for your time.
Laure
Hi Philippe,.
As far as I know there are Tecras with several specifications. Can you please tell us are you?
Tags: Toshiba
Similar Questions
-
Satellite T110-11U: WLan connection dropped and very slow performance
Hi people,
I use a Satellite T110-11U running windows 7 Home premium.
After having initially was very satisfied with its use, it now becomes more and more frustrating to use with wifi, with connections dropped and very slow performance.
I have updated the BIOS and think I have updated all drivers wirelss, but could be the problem. It seems that wireless, software of management is at fault because the networks are detected, but not clinging.
Any suggestion or tips to try will help save my sanity!
Thanks for your help.
John
> have updated the BIOS and think I have updated all drivers wirelss, but could be the problem.
If you need to make sure that you use the latest WLan driver.
The driver can be downloaded here:
http://APS2.toshiba-tro.de/WLAN/The laptop uses the Realtek RTL8191SE of WLan card.
Please also reset the settings of the Wlan router. I had a lot of problems with my WLan and after the reset of the router, performance problems disappeared. -
Very slow performance of my Macbook
Hello
My MacBook is very slow. It is still slow when I'm browsing with Safari.
I have no intention of buying additional RAM but want to tune up.
Someone could analyze the report I had running EtreCheck and give me advice how I could improve it?
Thanks in advance and here is the report:
EtreCheck version: 2.9.12 (265)
Report generated 2016-06-10 21:53:26
Download EtreCheck from https://etrecheck.com
Time 05:52
Performance: Below average
Click the [Support] links to help with non-Apple products.
Click [details] for more information on this line.
Problem: Computer is too slow
MacBook (13-inch, aluminum, late 2008)
[Data sheet] - [User Guide] - [warranty & Service]
MacBook - model: MacBook5, 1
1 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo CPU: 2 strands
2 GB RAM - Insufficient RAM! Extensible - [Instructions]
BANK 0/DIMM0
ok 1 GB DDR3 1067 MHz
0/DIMM1 BANK
ok 1 GB DDR3 1067 MHz
Bluetooth: Old - transfer/Airdrop2 not supported
Wireless: en1: 802.11 a/b/g/n
Battery: Health = Normal - Cycle count = 214
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M - VRAM: 256 MB
Color LCD 1280 x 800
OS X Yosemite 10.10.5 (14F1904) - since startup time: less than an hour
TOSHIBA MK2555GSXF disk0: (250,06 GB) (rotation)
EFI (disk0s1) < not mounted >: 210 MB
Macintosh HD (disk0s2) /: 249,20 (Go 191,92 free)
Recovery HD (disk0s3) < not mounted > [recovery]: 650 MB
HL-DT-ST DVD - RW GS21N)
Built-in ISight from Apple Inc..
Apple Inc. Apple keyboard / Trackpad
Computer, Inc. Apple IR receiver.
Apple Inc. BRCM2046 hub.
Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB host controller.
Mac App Store and identified developers
/ Library/Application Support/VirtualBox
[loading] org.virtualbox.kext.VBoxDrv (4.3.10 - 2016-06-07) [Support]
[loading] org.virtualbox.kext.VBoxNetAdp (4.3.10 - 2016-06-07) [Support]
[loading] org.virtualbox.kext.VBoxNetFlt (4.3.10 - 2016-06-07) [Support]
[loading] org.virtualbox.kext.VBoxUSB (4.3.10 - 2016-06-07) [Support]
[loaded] 4 tasks Apple
[loading] 148 tasks Apple
[operation] 60 tasks Apple
[failure] com.apple.Kerberos.digest - service.plist
com.apple.Kerberos.kdc.plist [failure]
[loaded] 47 tasks Apple
[loading] 137 tasks Apple
[operation] 75 tasks Apple
[failure] com.teamviewer.teamviewer.plist (2016-06-10) [Support]
[failure] com.teamviewer.teamviewer_desktop.plist (2016-06-10) [Support]
[loading] org.macosforge.xquartz.startx.plist (2012-06-01) [Support]
[loading] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist (2016-05-09) [Support]
[loading] com.teamviewer.Helper.plist (2016-01-07) [Support]
[failure] com.teamviewer.teamviewer_service.plist (2016-06-10) [Support]
[loading] org.macosforge.xquartz.privileged_startx.plist (2012-06-01) [Support]
org.VirtualBox.startup.plist [no charge] (2016-06-07) [Support]
com.apple.FolderActions.enabled.plist [no charge]
com.apple.FolderActions.folders.plist [loading]
org.VirtualBox.vboxwebsrv.plist [no charge] (2016-06-07) [Support]
[loading] 369 tasks Apple
[operation] 150 tasks Apple
FlashPlayer - 10.6: 21.0.0.242 - SDK 10.6 (2016-03-17) [Support]
QuickTime Plugin: 7.7.3 (2016-06-10)
Flash Player: 21.0.0.242 - SDK 10.6 (2016-03-17) [Support]
iPhotoPhotocast: 7.0 (2010-11-02)
Default browser: 600 - SDK 10.10 (2016-06-09)
Flash Player (2016-05-09) [Support]
Time Machine not configured!
40% syncdefaultsd
3% launchservicesd
2% safari
com.apple.WebKit.WebContent (3) 2%
kernel_task 2%
Top of page process of memory: ⓘ
457 MB com.apple.WebKit.WebContent (3)
Kernel_task 220 MB
Safari of 68 MB
WindowServer 41 MB
37 MB App Store
49MO RAM free
1.95 used GB RAM (448 MB cache)
Used Swap 0 B
10 June 2016, 21:17:52 self-test - spent
June 10, 2016, 21:11:32 /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/Safari_2016-06-10-211132_[redacted].hang
/Applications/Safari.app/Contents/MacOS/Safari
June 9, 2016, 02:29:43 /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/installd_2016-06-09-022943_[redacted].cpu_resou rce.diag [details]
/System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/PackageKit.framework/resources/installd
Wow, proof that Yosemite - can - run on only 2 GB of memory. I had not thought that it was possible in the real world.
If you are serious about not not upgrade the RAM I would recommend uninstalling/disabling the Flash Player and possibly disable Java Script as well. WEBCONTENT is currently the #1 drain resource on your mac, in order to prevent intensive pieces more than memory of the internet of the race should improve performance throughout the system. Usually I also recommend also downgrade to a less intensive old OS version resources such as the Mavericks or Mountain Lion, but given that you must have been to Yosemite for months I guess it works for you.
-
Qosmio G30-126 (PQG32E) - very slow performance of HARD drive
I have improved my Qosmio G30 126 at 4 GB of Ram, SSD 64 HDD as windows7 boot partition and 500 GB 7200 64cache HARD drive as drive HARD secondary but I have a very slow HARD drive performance when working in windows7, but when I work on a virtual machine Windows XP, the disk HARD perforemance is fine.
I've upgraded all drivers from toshiba.com for windows7 ultimate 32-bit drivers including drivers from the chipset intel but my problem is not solved. I also check all other performance issues and its OK.
The same problem exsists on my old HARD drive on Windows Vista Ultimate 32-bit and Windows 7 ultimate 32 bit.
I used HD tune software to check my HARD drive it accelerates gives about 100bps in windows 7 for my SSD and it gives 285mbps (this is the actual read speed) in the machine virtual Windows XP and the actual speed is significantly different.
Please tell me what to do because I suffer from my laptop very slow and spend a lot of mony on it without more.
Hello
To be honest it is really hard to tell why you have slow HARD drive performance but especially it s associated with a large number of programs they are running in the background. How many processes are started after Windows starts?
Also, the antivirus program may affect the performance of the computer. I would recommend using the AntiVir freeware tool and the Windows Firewall. That's enough if keep you Windows up-to-date and use a new Internet browser.
Also check the other discussions of the forum on the slow performance. You can find a lot of useful tips to improve performance. For example:
-Defragment HARD drive
-Disable the startup programs you don't need
-Uninstall unnecessary programs
-Run the CCleaner tool to remove old registry keys -
Tecra A2: Very slow start sequence
Hello
I use a PC laptop Toshiba Tecra A2, in my laptop startup sequence is very slow, it takes almost 10-15 minutes to display the login screen of the Windows XP splash screen. I formatted my laptop and installed XP fresh twice but the problem is still their.
Please help me...
Thanks in advance.
FloquetHello valerie
What is some external device connected to your laptop?
-
Very slow performance with Windows 7 on i7 Quad
I bought my wife a Lenovo E530 i7 quad with screen 1600 x 900 and running Win 7 in September 2012. Previously, she had an Asus Core 2 Duo also with Win 7. The laptop is used to picture (scanning, editing, cataloging) work, family, the navigation and email history.
The E530 was desperately slow at the beginning. Not better, not faster than the Asus. Performance seems to vary from slow to excruciatingly slow.
Features include:
-very slow to open programs
-slow to react to the choice of menus and clicks
-slow to react to the touchpad
-scrolling is not smooth, vibrates, much worse than Asus
-often distorts the sound and video, audio stutters
-IE9 make often video has properly - green band across the bottom with the rest of the colors shifted upward - change the video quality will fix it sometimes
-very slow internet response compared to the other machines on the same network of navigation.
However, startup speed seems to be OK.
I spent weeks (months?) through the forums, verification of updates, deletion and restoration of various programs and drivers looking for driver clashes. I tried the clean boot with only Windows drivers and various other combinations, and it made no difference.
For a long time wifi would be max 54 Mbps but somewhere through the process he begins to operate at up to 300Mbps.
Nothing seems to stand out in reports on health of the system and the event viewer. Windows experience scores seem to be everything I expected from my older i7.
Resources and performance monitor reports a problem with the hard drive:
The average disk queue length = Max 16 = 106
%Idle = 0
Disk read/s Ave = 0.093 Max = 3
Disk sec/Transfer Ave = 0,067 Max = 1
Disk s/write = 0.022 Ave
Even when the computer runs slower the CPU usage, and memory usage is not mounted and ceiling ever.
SFC report any breach of integrity.
FixIt MS - slow performance does not detect any problems.
The disk check is not a problem any.
It's so frustrating that my wife threatens to throw it in the trash and buy a Mac (the horrors :-)).
Any ideas on what I might have missed or what I should look at?
Thank you
Ken
Ken
Wish I had a 128 GB SSD. I suppose you see a serious helping hand to the performance of the system.
Please do not forget to mark the answer.
-
Very slow performance after P2V
Hi all
We did a P2V of a server and after his conversion, he must have very high use of the processor and extremely slow performance as a virtual machine. We did it,
1. all cleanings after P2V.
2. VMware tools update.
3. an increase in the CPU, RAM.
Nothing seems to work, any help please.
Thank you
Please confirm that you have removed the old equipment after P2V and all related material linked from the drivers, utilities, officials.
1. open a Windows command prompt and type the following command:
set devmgr_show_nonpresent_devices=1
This sets an environment variable that tells the Device Manager to display all the devices.
2. at the same command prompt, type
devmgmt.msc
You can also try to run msconfig and disable microsoft non-related services to help you identify what could be the cause of the problem.
- On the Services tab
- Select "Hide all Microsoft Services"
- Click on "disable all".
- Mark the VMware vCenter Converter Agent
- Mark the VMware vCenter Converter Server
- Click 'apply '.
- Click "close".
- Click "restart."
-
EBS 11i AutoInvoice very slow Performance
Hi all
EBS 11i
Oracle 9.2.0.6 32-bit
AutoInvoice transfer program has been listening to the bottom of the company, a bad start for 2013. Please help for this serious problem :(
Attached is the report "STATSPACK" for slow performance time.
... more... > http://www.datafilehost.com/download-60d3df1e.htmlSTATSPACK report for DB Name DB Id Instance Inst Num Release Cluster Host ------------ ----------- ------------ -------- ----------- ------- ------------ OAPROD 4204192100 OAPROD 1 9.2.0.6.0 NO oel5.prod e.local Snap Id Snap Time Sessions Curs/Sess Comment --------- ------------------ -------- --------- ------------------- Begin Snap: 551 02-Jan-13 22:00:04 123 59.1 End Snap: 553 03-Jan-13 00:00:02 97 48.7 Elapsed: 119.97 (mins) Cache Sizes (end) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Buffer Cache: 288M Std Block Size: 8K Shared Pool Size: 288M Log Buffer: 10,240K Load Profile ~~~~~~~~~~~~ Per Second Per Transaction --------------- --------------- Redo size: 54,437.02 65,579.53 Logical reads: 2,053,336.52 2,473,626.15 Block changes: 383.39 461.86 Physical reads: 43,270.67 52,127.57 Physical writes: 46.63 56.18 User calls: 35.83 43.16 Parses: 25.53 30.76 Hard parses: 0.18 0.21 Sorts: 186.25 224.38 Logons: 0.08 0.10 Executes: 108.76 131.02 Transactions: 0.83 % Blocks changed per Read: 0.02 Recursive Call %: 85.81 Rollback per transaction %: 3.18 Rows per Sort: 3.77 Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Buffer Nowait %: 99.99 Redo NoWait %: 99.98 Buffer Hit %: 97.90 In-memory Sort %: 100.00 Library Hit %: 99.87 Soft Parse %: 99.31 Execute to Parse %: 76.52 Latch Hit %: 99.96 Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %: 37.01 % Non-Parse CPU: 99.98 Shared Pool Statistics Begin End ------ ------ Memory Usage %: 95.13 94.82 % SQL with executions>1: 83.58 95.42 % Memory for SQL w/exec>1: 79.28 92.57 Top 5 Timed Events ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ % Total Event Waits Time (s) Ela Time -------------------------------------------- ------------ ----------- -------- CPU time 74,717 84.80 latch free 181,788 8,101 9.19 db file scattered read 47,546,136 2,893 3.28 db file sequential read 23,092,208 2,006 2.28 buffer busy waits 1,812,920 193 .22 ------------------------------------------------------------- ^LWait Events for DB: OAPROD Instance: OAPROD Snaps: 551 -553 -> s - second -> cs - centisecond - 100th of a second -> ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second -> us - microsecond - 1000000th of a second -> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last) Avg Total Wait wait Waits Event Waits Timeouts Time (s) (ms) /txn ---------------------------- ------------ ---------- ---------- ------ -------- latch free 181,788 180,378 8,101 45 30.4 db file scattered read 47,546,136 0 2,893 0 7,957.5 db file sequential read 23,092,208 0 2,006 0 3,864.8 buffer busy waits 1,812,920 2 193 0 303.4 log file switch (checkpoint 124 51 69 560 0.0 log file parallel write 21,251 0 39 2 3.6 log file sync 4,072 0 21 5 0.7 control file parallel write 3,061 0 12 4 0.5 library cache load lock 5 2 9 1806 0.0 log file switch completion 54 6 8 148 0.0 PX Deq: Execute Reply 7,268 0 6 1 1.2 PX Deq: Signal ACK 297 103 6 21 0.0 PX qref latch 310 279 5 16 0.1 PX Deq: Msg Fragment 4,301 0 4 1 0.7 PX Deq Credit: send blkd 1,256 0 2 2 0.2 PX Deq: Parse Reply 267 0 2 7 0.0 process startup 46 0 2 39 0.0 PX Deq: Table Q Sample 84 0 2 22 0.0 library cache pin 337 0 1 4 0.1 kksfbc child completion 116 76 1 11 0.0 write complete waits 2 1 1 491 0.0 PX Deq: Join ACK 212 0 1 4 0.0 SQL*Net break/reset to clien 2,152 0 1 0 0.4 enqueue 80 0 1 7 0.0 db file parallel read 38 0 0 13 0.0 SQL*Net more data to client 24,272 0 0 0 4.1 log file single write 160 0 0 2 0.0 PX Deq: Table Q qref 62 0 0 4 0.0 control file sequential read 4,336 0 0 0 0.7 direct path read 45,818 0 0 0 7.7 library cache lock 1 0 0 76 0.0 direct path write 22,821 0 0 0 3.8 LGWR wait for redo copy 5,387 0 0 0 0.9 PX Deq Credit: need buffer 206 0 0 0 0.0 undo segment extension 40,035 40,028 0 0 6.7 db file parallel write 3,904 0 0 0 0.7 db file single write 40 0 0 0 0.0 log file sequential read 160 0 0 0 0.0 async disk IO 40 0 0 0 0.0 SQL*Net message from client 269,626 0 337,613 1252 45.1 pipe get 5,313 5,286 21,063 3964 0.9 queue messages 1,466 1,464 14,023 9566 0.2 wakeup time manager 239 238 6,738 28191 0.0 PX Idle Wait 3,475 3,042 6,026 1734 0.6 jobq slave wait 961 960 2,824 2939 0.2 PX Deq: Execution Msg 9,423 1 159 17 1.6 PX Deq: Table Q Normal 1,362 4 8 6 0.2 SQL*Net more data from clien 12,643 0 2 0 2.1 SQL*Net message to client 269,616 0 0 0 45.1 ^LWait Events for DB: OAPROD Instance: OAPROD Snaps: 551 -553 -> s - second -> cs - centisecond - 100th of a second -> ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second -> us - microsecond - 1000000th of a second -> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last) Avg Total Wait wait Waits Event Waits Timeouts Time (s) (ms) /txn ---------------------------- ------------ ---------- ---------- ------ -------- ------------------------------------------------------------- ^LBackground Wait Events for DB: OAPROD Instance: OAPROD Snaps: 551 -553 -> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last) Avg Total Wait wait Waits Event Waits Timeouts Time (s) (ms) /txn ---------------------------- ------------ ---------- ---------- ------ -------- log file parallel write 21,251 0 39 2 3.6 latch free 407 353 13 32 0.1 control file parallel write 2,981 0 12 4 0.5 db file scattered read 3,464 0 5 1 0.6 db file sequential read 1,756 0 2 1 0.3 rdbms ipc reply 137 0 2 16 0.0 log file single write 160 0 0 2 0.0 enqueue 17 0 0 6 0.0 control file sequential read 3,346 0 0 0 0.6 LGWR wait for redo copy 5,387 0 0 0 0.9 db file parallel write 3,904 0 0 0 0.7 direct path read 1,833 0 0 0 0.3 direct path write 1,833 0 0 0 0.3 log file sequential read 160 0 0 0 0.0 buffer busy waits 21 0 0 0 0.0 rdbms ipc message 41,753 9,476 33,069 792 7.0 pmon timer 4,438 2,164 7,021 1582 0.7 smon timer 522 1 6,820 13064 0.1 ------------------------------------------------------------- ^LSQL ordered by Gets for DB: OAPROD Instance: OAPROD Snaps: 551 -553 -> End Buffer Gets Threshold: 10000 -> Note that resources reported for PL/SQL includes the resources used by all SQL statements called within the PL/SQL code. As individual SQL statements are also reported, it is possible and valid for the summed total % to exceed 100 CPU Elapsd Buffer Gets Executions Gets per Exec %Total Time (s) Time (s) Hash Value --------------- ------------ -------------- ------ -------- --------- ---------- 5,636,117,159 28 201,289,898.5 38.1 ######## ######### 835260576 Module: RAXTRX INSERT INTO RA_INTERFACE_ERRORS (INTERFACE_LINE_ID, MESSAGE_ TEXT, INVALID_VALUE) SELECT INTERFACE_LINE_ID, :b_err_msg6, ' trx_number='||T.TRX_NUMBER||','||'customer_trx_id='||TL.CUSTOMER _TRX_ID FROM RA_INTERFACE_LINES_GT IL, RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_LINES TL, RA_CUSTOMER_TRX T WHERE IL.REQUEST_ID = :b1 AND IL.INTERFAC 511,626,129 20 25,581,306.5 3.5 8155.90 15045.56 205460129 Module: JDBC Thin Client select TRANSACTION_BRANCH , BRANCH_ADDRESS_1 , BRANCH_ADDRESS_2 , BRANCH_PHONES , BRANCH_FAX , BRANCH_TIN , TRX_NUMBER , TRX_NU MBER_DISP , TRX_DATE , TRX_DATE_DISP , BILL_TO_CUSTOMER_ID , BIL L_TO_CUSTOMER_NAME , SHIP_DATE_ACTUAL_DISP , SHIP_TO_NAME , SHIP _TO_ADDRESS1 , SHIP_TO_ADDRESS2 , SHIP_TO_ADDRESS3 , SHIP_TO_ADD 114,013,000 8,544 13,344.2 0.8 2919.47 4527.54 803969757 Module: JDBC Thin Client SELECT COALESCE(DELV_ADDR.CITY, DELV_ADDR.PROVINCE) FROM APPS.OE _ORDER_HEADERS_ALL OE_HEADERS , APPS.RA_SITE_USES_ALL DELV_SITE , APPS.RA_ADDRESSES_ALL DELV_ADDR WHERE TO_CHAR(ORDER_NUMBER) = :B1 AND DELV_SITE.SITE_USE_ID(+) = OE_HEADERS.DELIVER_TO_ORG_ID AND DELV_ADDR.ADDRESS_ID(+) = DELV_SITE.ADDRESS_ID 113,972,897 8,550 13,330.2 0.8 2924.20 4550.22 3761220362 Module: JDBC Thin Client SELECT DELV_ADDR.ADDRESS1 FROM APPS.OE_ORDER_HEADERS_ALL OE_HEAD ERS , APPS.RA_SITE_USES_ALL DELV_SITE , APPS.RA_ADDRESSES_ALL DE LV_ADDR WHERE TO_CHAR(ORDER_NUMBER) = :B1 AND DELV_SITE.SITE_USE _ID(+) = OE_HEADERS.DELIVER_TO_ORG_ID AND DELV_ADDR.ADDRESS_ID(+ ) = DELV_SITE.ADDRESS_ID 113,972,850 8,551 13,328.6 0.8 2919.13 4533.69 4273350236 Module: JDBC Thin Client
If this download file...
Uncheck the [use our Download Manager and download recommended downloads
Your help is very appreciated.
Thank you very much
Janyxes2013 wrote:
Thanks again,Users are complaining that applications oracle is suspended although few users use only as 4 users, and sometimes even no one is using it... so weird. Can it
be caused by simultaneous on-demand batch running background?It is possible, and it depends on what simultaneous programs are underway.
How can I enumerate all running simultaneous tasks?
Query FND_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS - http://etrm.oracle.com/pls/trm11510/etrm_pnav.show_object?c_name=FND_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS&c_owner=APPLSYS&c_type=TABLE
Simultaneous treatment - what are the meanings of the Codes in the STATUS_CODE and the PHASE_CODE FND_CONCURRENT_REQUESTS Table columns? [152209.1 ID]
Thank you
Hussein -
The performance of Lightroom on my computer became, at times, horribly slow. My iMac is rebooted and do not open any other programs or browsers, it just took about eight minutes to import the 23 files and a few more minutes to build 1:1 previews. When things work very well that it may take a minute. (I always build 1:1 on import previews and it comes up with the recently imported as well as the older files, is not a matter of having to build previews on the fly). I have had extremely slow performance ("Loading") just go from one photo to another in the library modules and develop or move from one module to another, usually up to about 90 seconds, or when LR "prepare the file" for export or edit in PS. But not always - sometimes it is quite zippy - and there is no pattern that I can see. Generally when this happens, 'pressure' of the memory and the processor are normal, but it happens when its use is minimal as well. Sometimes, there is a ball rotation range, but are generally not.
My catalog has about 30 k pictures and very few presets of any kind. Probably 75% of these records were never published at all. I do not hundreds of local equalization, rarely more than a decade in an image. I have about 40 smart Collections with an average of several hundred images each. I rarely use intelligent previews. I optimize and save the catalog each time that I use LR, which is a few times a week. My file/folder structure is simple and clean: / Pictures/year/day.
I use LR 5.4 on an iMac mid-2011, 3.4 GHz Intel Core i7 with 16 GB of memory. I have the Lightroom Catalog and previews on the primary drive, which is a 250 GB SSD with about 100 GB free. (The problem happened when my catalog was the different internal disk, too). My Pictures folder is on an internal hard drive with 100 GB available. I have set to 50GB maximum cache size. I'm running the Mavericks but it was just too slow under Mountain Lion. It was just as slow in the previous Lightroom, major and minor versions. Other programs/applications run fine on my computer, including Photoshop. (Generally, LR performance is the same whether the PS is running.) The only problem with performance, I noticed since switching to the Mavericks is Finder to hold for a few seconds each time than in quite awhile.
I've seen this problem in Lightroom called on various forums, including the Adobe forums for some time - years - and I've never seen a definitive solution. I think that I have answered all the questions that are commonly asked. Is there a solution to this? I use LR 30-40 hours per week. I am pulling my hair and the ability to switch to another program would be the last resort, but I might have to do.
I appreciate the suggestions. I tried to use a new catalog with only a couple hundred pictures and the same thing happens. I'm sure that my ssd is very good because Photoshop and many other applications use without delays. However, so far I have never had these problems on my Macbook, which runs also Maverick, so I start to wonder if it is largely a problem with my iMac.
-
Very slow performance on EVA4400
Hello guys,.
I need help about:
So I have a configuration consisting of a few servers HP ProLiant DL380 G5 (2 x Quad-Core Xeon X 5470 + 24 GB of RAM) with dual-port HP FC2242SR 4 GB/s HBA (enforcement of a vSphere 4.1) connected to a HP EVA4400 consisting of 24 300 GB 15K FC disks.
The servers each have 2 network cards connected to a Cisco 2960 G switch and connected to a dvSwitch in vSphere.
The disks are grouped into a single DiskGroup on the EVA, and I a Vdisk 1040 of GB (LUNS) created with RAID level 5.
Well, now I have a virtual machine with Windows Server 2008 R2, acting as a file server. Is the virtual material consists of 4 GB of ram and 4 cores of the processor and the LUN I mentioned above is mounted as a data store VMFS to the host and divided up like a vmdk of 40 GB for the OS (with LSI SAS controller) and an another vmdk of ~ 1 TB on a controller separated from Paravirtual... .intended for real storage of files. The two drives are configured as Thin Provisioning
And also it has a single VMXNET3 NIC.
The problem is that the file server is running very bad, it is about 10-12 Mbps for writing and 20 to 30 Mbps per bed.
I tested it by transferring ~ 2, 3 ~ and ~ 4 GB .iso files to and from the server.
I have tried to my workstation, other virtual machines & physical servers... the performance is the same.
I also vMotioned the file to another server hosts... still the same thing.
I thought that maybe it is something wrong with the virtual machine itself... so since I was an another windows 2008 R2 VM residing on a smaller (150 GB) LUN I did the same test by copying .iso to that... and the performance was the same. And I also did a Linux VM... his thing.
Any ideea what the problem is there... because it just seems very bad performance... it's as much slower even than a normal PC
Basically there is virtually no traffic on the fibre channel network most of the time... it's not congestion or anything like that.
The EVA and the FC switches are running the latest firmware.
Help, please.
Thank you
fight the block cache on EVA are fully charged? or is there any failuer disk raid reconstruction is done in the background.
-
Original title: I have a BIG problem!
When I start my computer I is no longer able to enter my tab start. It is empty. When I shoot computer (search) it says that I have nothing. All files have been deleted! A program called OnPay, Inc. (USA) check my computer using the recovery of files. OnPay, Inc. says that it is a system utility. It is capable of S.M.A.R.T. (so it says). I used to have Microsoft Security Essentials, but my computer can't find it. When I go on the Internet or in another file, a Service Manager window pops up saying that t8EXTPEx.dll is missing or still missing. This program of OnPay, Inc. just wants me to buy their service - but won't give me their price. Windows Security Center can't be started is another message that I get. I also get the window that Windows Defender encountered error 0 x 80070424. The specified server does not exist as an installed service. Help! My computer is very slow. I have Internet through pdli.net (Pioneer). My email address is: * address removed privacy e-mail. *
I hope that I'm not a lost cause! Thank you very much for your help!
Jan Bornemann
Address removed from electronic privacy. *
Phone number removed for privacy protection *.
Hello
Method 1:
I suggest to go through the steps from the link provided and check if it helps.
Levonorgestrol error 0 x 80070424 when you use Windows Update, Microsoft Update, or Windows Firewall
http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/968002
I also suggest you to start the computer in safe mode with network and run a full scan using the Microsoft Safety Scanner and check.
Method 2:
Step 1:
Start your computer in safe mode with networking;
http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/start-your-computer-in-safe-mode
Step 2:
Scan the computer by visiting the link below:
http://www.Microsoft.com/security/scanner/en-us/default.aspx
Note: there is a risk of data loss if all the files are infected and which can be removed in the cleaning process.
Hope this helps and keep us posted.
-
Toshiba Satellite L655D very slow
Recently, I deleted it from my laptop and started more as it kept crashing and was very slow. The only programs I loaded on it that wiping it was Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2010 we bought through a program offered by the school district in my children, Norton and Silhouette Studio (for my craft cutting machine). My laptop has a processor dual core AMD turion II p540 2.40 GHz and 4 GB of RAM (3.74 GB usable) and it's a 64-bit OS Windows 7 Home Premium with service pack 1.
I feel is no longer a problem with it crashing, but it continues to be slow... opening web pages in particular. I heard it might be Norton do not interact with office or office is too big for my laptop. Any thoughts? I look at Norton switch in another protection software or add RAM? I appreciate help with this. I don't have the money to go and buy a new laptop and looking for some inexpensive ways to extend the life of it. :)
Michele
In my humble OPINION Symantec/Norton should not be placed on any machine, but I don't think that the software installed is causing your slow.
I don't think RAM will help (chances are that you do not use all you need)
We need a lot more information
Was never not slow computer on win 7?
How fast is your internet connection?
What are the specifications of the system?
etc, etc, etc.
-
Very slow performance on iMac, please help
I installed VMware Fusion on my iMac and my normal iMac works perfectly. However, the VMware runs MUCH MORE slow. Here are the specs on my computer:
2.7 GHz i5
8 GB 1600 Mhz DDR3
I thought it might be a ram problem, even if on the side of the virtual machine from things I have only a single internet window open, and is to show that I'm allocate 2 GB of ram.
What you think may cause these slow speeds and what can I do about it?
Thank you!
Hello
As you mention that you have an imac, please take a look at this answer of DariusD here:
Yosemite and Fusion 7 - very very slow
Note that not all iMacs have this problem.
You can check if you have the problem by checking if your computer has the storm of interruption as described here by HPReg :
Re: Fusion 7 runs VERY SLOWLY on the GM of Yosemite
--
Wil
-
Satellite A200-1BP: very slow performance
I'm not completely satisfied with the performance of my laptop Satellite A200-1BP.
It is so slow that I expected although it has 2 GB of ram.What could be the problem?
It is thanks to Norton Antivirus what?How can I configure my phone for maximum performance?
Someone help please!
Maximum performance is fairly general term. I hope that you know very well that Vista needs far more resources than Windows XP Home edition and, in general, it might be a little more slowly. Of course, performance is dependent on all the background running processes.
To be honest, the first thing I did is to delete preinstalled Norton. I'm sure that without Norton System work better. Please also check all the tools and utilities that begin with OS (START > RUN > MSCONFIG) and disable all the stuff, you do not need.
What you can also do is to disable all hardware components, you must not like modem or PCMCIA slot. As you can see there are many ways to optimize the operating system and to run faster.
Good bye
-
Portege R400: Very slow Performance with Vista Ultimate
Hi all
Portege R400 is delivered with Windows Vista Ultimate 32-bit Edition and Vista is really - honestly - incredibly slow! (especially with R400, due to the configuration of the laptop)
So I decided to install Windows XP Tablet PC... But I discovered that there is no driver available for R400 XP.I'm not directly complaining on the Portege models/series...
It's a great design and I bought it, knowing the configuration. But I didn't know how Vista was eager for system resources...I complain on Toshiba policy or what-so-ever ONLY to the Vista and not XP drivers.
Microsoft is desperately trying to sell Vista because they know, they really don't have this time and I heard stories about how they block their own market XP... .and I think that Microsoft and Toshiba can have an agreement on "selling only computers laptop Vista..." (just a guess but it seems so... correct me if I'm wrong)
It is a torture to use Vista on Portege R400 and other equivalent configurations. (even when all the Visual effects system, disabled etc.)
On the other hand, I can't use my XP on R400 tablet... so...So, trust me when I say I'm going to throw it away!
But before doing this, if anyone of you knows a solution to my problem. Please let me know,
because I paid a lot of money for this turtle.concerning
PS: I hope that this is a democratic platform and my post not be erased or changed.
Hello
First of all, you don't have to suspect Microsoft or Toshiba has an agreement with Vista. Toshiba isn't the only primary selling units with just a VIsta operating system, almost every laptop to the manufacturer it.
And you're right, Vista is a slow operating system, because it has a new UI with lots of graphic effects here and there and many features like the sidebar, you have really not at all.Since I bought my first one Vista laptop at the beginning of the year, I thought, as I don't want to not be installed and want my XP back and so on and there was no available to manufacturers of XP drivers download page either. I have a Toshiba laptop no and had the same frustration as you.
Now, I had two options, check every important feature on my own via google or using tools such as engineering pilot or pimp my Vista driver installation.
Firstly I did an installation of XP, all drivers to research, I need, who did not take my as much as I thought it would be. But after a while, I wanted to give the new Microsoft OS a chance.Used disk recovery and first wiped all the software I didn't need, so goodbye almost every tool installed on my machine, which was not unique to microsoft.
Disabled many features, that I didn't want and I can say, speed increased a lot! This brought my buy an original version of Vista, made a new installation, installed all the drivers necessary, and hey, I'm happy with it.Thus, ended with my story, you have two options now. Search XP drivers on your own, using the tools and google or tweak your Vista. There are many guides on the internet that can help you.
And do not be angry with Toshiba, as it's the same problem with other manufacturers too, as you can see in my case.
HomerJ
Maybe you are looking for
-
Is it possible to remove the dye on the top bar in firefox?
If you don't know what I'm talking about http://imgur.com/OWIEVsL
-
I've recently updated 12.3.3.17 on W10, after what all my music was missing from my iTunes library. I have a cloud beside my purchases and my rips of CD disappeared. All the music is always in the iTunes media folder, but I can't seem to find my iT
-
How to permanently delete movies and to clear the cache?
Some time ago I synced a few videos my iPhone 6. While I was scrolling my phone later I looked to the top of all the videos that I have synced, so I crept just left and deleted all of the videos that I have synced. I also deleted them from my PC and
-
Update of map chart/PSU (power supply) for Lenovo Thinkcentre A70-7844C1U
Specifications of the computer: Lenovo Thinkcentre A70-7844C1U Processor Intel Pentium Dual Core E5500 (2.80 GHz) 4 GB of DDR3 RAM (upgrading to 2 GB) Intel GMA X 4500 (integrated graphics) 180-watt power supply I decided my computer needed some acti
-
Vista-the date and time are reset to dec 2007
Whenever my computer load now, the date and time are reset to dec 2007 and I continue to have this change manually. I am owner of Acer - windows Vista purchased in 2008. Help, please!