Translation issue

Similar Questions

• Language not displaying options do not Google Translate in Firefox

  Firefox is still having a problem displaying the languages in the drop-down control to Google Translate. This issue has been addressed in another thread, (now archived) here:

  https://support.Mozilla.org/en-us/questions/957611?ESAB=a & As = AAQ

  I still encounter the problem, and I created a SIMPLER example to illustrate the problem, here:

  http://www.Audiosparx.com/SA/testing/translate/test.htm

  What we have tried so far to solve:

  1. we tried the reset Firefox option, which did not solve the problem
  2 uninstall, reinstall, which did not solve the problem

  The strange thing is that it works very well on a system running Windows 7, and it worked for two Firefox, 23, 24 and 25, which were upgraded to the order. But it does not work on an another high-end system nine also runs Windows 7 and 25 of Firefox.

  It works very well on Google Chrome. Internet Explorer does not yet display control to translate! Something changed recently potentially with Google translation which is the cause of break. I'm not the first to report, although he seemed to have resolved for other people in some cases, without an explantation.

  A customer has reported this problem and we can reproduce it on a Windows 7 system, but also is not another system running Windows 7.

  Any help that you can offer to fix it for Firefox users would be much appreciated.

  Note that Google translation element requires Flash work, so if it does not work so make sure you who have installed the Flash plugin and you also authorize this plugin.

  You can check for problems with the latest version of the Flash plugin and try these:

  • disable an eventual extension of the browser for Firefox Plugin RealPlayer Record and if installed RealPlayer update
  • Disable protected mode in the plugin Flash (Flash 11.3 + on Windows Vista and later versions)
  • turn off hardware acceleration in the Flash plugin
  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/Flash#troubleshooting

• Issue a Qosmio X 505-Q870 - BSOD and display

  I get BSOD frequently (at least twice a week) and hope someone could help me with this. Unfortunately I do not have the minidump files, but I don't know the names of the files that caused it... Is the reason why I did not have the minidump files - the minidump file gets deleted after that I reload, I did not delete them manually...

  But I got a copy of the file when I had last week and I sent it to an admin in another forum, that's what he sent me

  "caused by:

  2: kd > lmvm nvlddmkm
  start end module name
  fffff880'0f4ec000 fffff880'10147300 nvlddmkm T (no symbol)
  Loaded symbol image file: nvlddmkm.sys
  Image path: \SystemRoot\system32\DRIVERS\nvlddmkm.sys
  Image name: nvlddmkm.sys
  Timestamp: Thu Mar 17 09:08:59 2011 (4D81C19B)
  CheckSum: 00C6915C
  ImageSize: 00C5B300
  "Translations: 0000.04b0 0000.04e4 0409.04b0 0409.04e4"

  and yesterday, after the bsod, I ran to see blue screen and it showed that 2 files were involved.
  1 dxgmms1.sys
  2 dxgkrnl.sys

  I guess it has something to do with the VGA, I also sometimes have these boxes of weird colors on my screen and when I move around the window that is open at the time, she disappears - these boxes began to appear on and outside of the time that I started using the laptop... Please note that I have the latest VGA drivers installed...

  Another issue that really bothers me is once the display is switched off automatically, I can't put it back on, I have to restart the laptop! After the screen saver, I put it to disable the display in 15 minutes, so when it is off, can not get the screen to the top... but I've heard fans work so I know that the pc works... even USB devices work... but what I do, the screen is just blank... It was not always like that, it happened after updating drivers in February (I think) and I kept the drivers up to date since then, but this problem persists...

  Really hope that someone will be able to give a quick solution and permanent on this subject. I bought this the United States and who are currently living in Australia, do not know the validity of the warranty...

  null

  If you see blocks of colors on the screen while using the provided Toshiba display driver, which usually indicates a problem with the hardware.

  I would like to send the phone in for warranty repair in a center of Service from Toshiba.

• my girls hotmail has been hacked and they have changed the security issue in Spanish

  my girls hotmail has been hacked and they have changed security issue for Spaniards and chenged the issue of safety to another question, not my original question how do I protect my little girl and RECOVER his Email account please.

  I found by registering for my daughter for a Facebook account, and they say that someonelse already had this account. It can't be the case because we had my acocunt girls for a long time!

  I FOLLOWED ALL the steps but because

  1. they changed the security question to "my favorite place" and also in Spanish (I have translated question online) (THIS ISN'T our original question)

  There is no way to change this.

  2. I have an account with the said email address. I changed the password and I tried to connect through the hotmail page log but would not yet allow him.

  Please HELP it is too young to have problems like this.  Thank you

  Hello

  I suggest you to post the question in the forum below and check if it helps:
  http://windowslivehelp.com/forums.aspx?ProductID=1

  It will be useful.

• Add language translator we for use offline in MS Office

  I work for a nonprofit and need a translator to add language that can be used without having to go online. We must work with MS Office 2007. The reason for the offline use is, my body has mandated state confidentiality issues.

  Download on a different machine, then move it to your machine on a USB stick and install it?

  <>http://www.Microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?displaylang=en&ID=5780 >

  HTH,
  JW

• Issue of the journal of diagnosis

  I'm an EQL PS6100 storage array usage in a disconnected site where items must be (absolutely no exceptions) reviewed before sending. Diagnosis of the table is encrypted and is not human-readable. I was able to work with support without diagnostic logs but am now running in a recurring issue.

  I would like to get these logs to Dell in order to identify a root cause. Is there a way to generate unencrypted newspapers or a certificate of sorts offered by Dell that indicates the data found in the newspapers themselves?

  Thanks for any input.

  Hello

  There is no document like this, I know.   Does not mean that it could not be written.

  Short version is the diag newspapers are the result of various exclusive commands that dump newspapers, the DB group, info on the H/W status, network status, .drive history, cache, etc.   As a block device table doesn't have access to the flies.  Blocks are translated in the pages of 15 MB.  Each page may have different parts of a volume on the subject.  Data on the pages is not used in the order.  So, even if the controller could access the data, it's like crack an egg to the EQL OS uses to start the controller.  The management software for network, iSCSI and all admin operations are handled by code EQL.   Only HTTP: / Telenet/SSH/ftp are managed by the OS default.

  Re: RCA.  Without complete diagnostic tests, I would say that it is impossible to determine the RCA.  Moreover, newspapers are circular, so longer you wait, the more likely some data will be restored by the newspapers.

  Re: on-site.  No, field technicians are lead in order to replace the failed H/W no triage.

  Kind regards

  Don

• My hotmail hacked, now I have to translate to English from Chinese. How can I get it back to English normally?

  I don't want to have to translate my email all the time, it should be in English normally tried everything that I can understand for c-Help...

  Hello

  While in Hotmail online - top-right - Options - Customize Hotmail - languages

  Answers is a peer group supported and unfortunately has no real influence on Hotmail.

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  HotMail has its own Forums, so you can ask your questions there.

  Windows Live Solution Center - HotMail - HotMail Forums Solutions
  http://windowslivehelp.com/

  Hotmail - Forums
  http://windowslivehelp.com/forums.aspx?ProductID=1

  Hotmail - Solutions
  http://windowslivehelp.com/solutions.aspx?ProductID=1

  How to contact Windows Live Hotmail Support
  http://email.about.com/od/hotmailtips/Qt/et_hotmail_supp.htm

  Windows Live Hotmail Top issues and Support information
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/316659/en-us

  Error message "your account has been locked" when trying to connect
  http://windowslivehelp.com/thread.aspx?ThreadId=77be7d82-a0e9-49c7-b46d-040ec654a9e2

  Compromised account - access unauthorized account - how to recover your account
  http://windowslivehelp.com/solution.aspx?SolutionID=6ea0c7b3-1473-4176-b03f-145b951dcb41

  Hotmail hacked? Take these steps
  http://blogs.msdn.com/b/securitytipstalk/archive/2010/07/07/Hotmail-hacked-take-these-steps.aspx

  I hope this helps.

  Rob Brown - Microsoft MVP<- profile="" -="" windows="" expert="" -="" consumer="" :="" bicycle="" -="" mark="" twain="" said="" it="">

• [Issue] How data is transferred when you use BlackBerry (NFC) Tag? WiFi Direct? Bluetooth 2.1? Bluetooth 3.0?

  Hello

  I saw a bunch of videos of demonstration of tag BlackBerry of all the cool things you can do with the NFC, but it wondered, what happens if all my other antenas wireless, WiFi and Bluetooth, are out of?

  NFC can be used to transfer data, but it is not good for large quantities. I looked a little further and I found this cool video showing the difference to use Bluetooth 2.1, Bluetooth 3.0 high speed and Wifi Direct to transfer large files, such as videos. BB10 already does support Wifi Direct? Bluetooth 3.0 high speed?

  I hope that BB10 supports ALL the performance and maximum compatibility.

  I don't know where to post this question so here's. Please move was a better place. I think that the community needs a session of general development for wider issues.

  See you soon!

  Hello

  Tag BlackBerry, and the APIs available for developers will automatically perform the best way to transfer the data. NFC supports something called "connect transfer" and are the largest payloads or certain types of data (photos, for example) rather than by peer-to-peer NFC, NFC mode data transfer is just used to negotiate alternative transport. In the case of the BlackBerry smart phones, this alternative will be bluetooth.

  For users of touch devices, there is a brief 'conversation' between the devices on the NFC and this translates into a bluetooth connection set up and data transfer initiated through the bluetooth connection faster. This is all without the usual matching process. After reaching the stage of bluetooth devices need closer will be of course.

  The same principle applies to both 7 BlackBerry and BlackBerry 10. In fact talk us a bit about this in our latest article on BlackBerry 10 NFC API:

  http://supportforums.BlackBerry.com/T5/native-development/BlackBerry-10-sharing-using-NfcShareManage...

  I hope this helps.

  For more information on see NFC:

  http://supportforums.BlackBerry.com/T5/Java-development/NFC-article-and-code-index/Ta-p/1538775

• NAT problem? Large amount of NAT translations.

  I have a client with a particular site who complains constantly of performance.

  They have a 871 at the location remote with 4 tunnels IPsec, built over WAN connections to their provider hosting the database and software.

  There are about 50 people who work at this place, but I show 3410 current connections with a peak of 14703. I don't see how that's possible with only 50 people and starts to lean towards the NAT config which can be the cause of the poor performance that users encounter.

  Auffen_Washington #show ip nat statistics
  Total active translations: 3410 (static, dynamic 0 3410; 3410 extended)
  Translations of crete: 14703, took place there is 2d05h
  External interfaces:
  FastEthernet4, Tunnel401, Tunnel0, Tunnel11, Vlan3, Tunnel101, Tunnel201
  Tunnel301
  Interfaces in reverse:
  Vlan1, Vlan2
  Hits: 574573468 Misses: 0
  CEF translated packages: 566630850, CEF punted packets: 45186206
  Expiry of the translations: 10381404
  Dynamic mappings:
  -Source inside
  [Id: 1] access-list interface Loopback1 refcount NAT_Wireless_DMS 0
  [Id: 2] NAT_Failover interface Vlan3 refcount route map 0
  [Id: 3] NAT_Primary interface FastEthernet4 refcount 3410 route map
  Doors appl: 0
  Normal doors: 0
  Queuing of packets: 0

  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you

  Russell Stamey

  NAT translations, by default, remain active for a very long time. If I remember correctly, is 24 hours, but I have to what to look for to be sure. They don't take a lot of memory, so this isn't normally a problem, but if you encounter conditions that you think may be due to this, it is quite easy to limit the wait time.

   ip nat translation timeout 1800

  This will set the timeout for new connections to half an hour. Existing connections will always keep the original deadlines, then you might want to wait a period of slow to change and the issue a "clear the ip nat translation *" right then to clear existing translations.

• Massive static NAT translations

  I have to perform a lot of NAT translations on a router (more than 300) for a management issue and I would like to find a way to do it without having to define each NAT command on the router.

  Is it possible to do? I thought to use wildcards or something of the sort, but don't know if it's possible.

  Thank you very much

  Enric

  Then this might help you.

  IP nat inside source static network 10.10.10.0 192.168.17.0/24

  In this example, NAT will be only the first three bytes (24 bits), leaving the rest untouched.

  for example. 10.10.10.27 becomes 192.168.17.27,

  10.10.10.141 will become 192.168.17.141 and so on and so forth.

• Anyone know of any compatibility issues with Windows 8 and RV series routers?

  I have a small network with a laptop computer, Windows 8, Windows XP desktop computer and a network MyBookLiveDuo storage device. I have sharing enabled between these devices. Everything worked well on a network switch. I replaced the switch with the RV110W VPN Firewall Router to add better security to my network before I have expand it. Since then, I have a laptop Windows 8 intermittent connectivity while the connectivity of the XP desktop computer shows no problem.

  On the laptop Windows 8 I ran network troubleshooting, and he complained that two devices on the network are (NAT) network address translation and the symptoms he describes is what I see. Problem is that I don't have a network Analyzer to look at the network in more depth. I looked online for the RV110W documentation and if NAT is listed as one of the characteristics, there is no discussion in the documentation on how to manage this feature in the router.

  I can connect to the Windows 8 laptop from Office XP and access shared content. I can connect to the Duo since Office XP without difficulty. However, except when they reappear periodically under the heading of my network in Explorer on the laptop Windows 8, I can't access the Office XP or the Duo of the laptop Windows 8. Curiously, however, I have a part of the Duo mapped as a network drive on the laptop Windows 8 and I can access it even when everything else has gone. Also, the interface of management for the Duo appears on the laptop Windows 8 and I can access the Duo to manage. Only, I can't access the shares on the Duo. Then all of a sudden they reappear under network in the file Explorer and I can then access. I think it must have to do with NAT, but I can't find anything out about it.

  If it's something I can turn on the router long enough to see if the problem goes away I would like to try, but I can't find it in the documentation, and I can't find it when I look aroiund in the management interface.

  The fact that I am not having the form of the XP desktop computer problem makes me think that a compatibility issue with Windows 8. Does anyone know if Windows 8 did anything with NAT? I try to get help from Microsoft Technical Support, but their level 1 tech told me to call Tech Support Pro when they open later this morning. Support cat Cisco won't open until Monday at 09:00.

  Also, throughout this connection problem Internet from the laptop through the router is never interrupted. It's strictly connectivity with other devices on the internal network that comes and goes.

  Hi Gregg,

  NAT must not play unless your applications on the internet. The "port Internet" or "WAN port" is a NAT port that converts your public IP address from ISP to your LAN subnet addresses. NAT allows multiple computers on a network to use 1 public IP address.

  If your devices are connected to the Ether "LAN ports" they are not affected by NAT unless they are Web applications. 4 'LAN ports"are 2 layer switch ports. This means that all local requests are forwarded by the switch ports.

  This device did replace exactly? The XP computers, DUET and window 8, make these products using the static IP address or you allow the RV110 to assign an IP address automatically? What IP address you are using on the LAN of the RV110?

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• No group of translation found for tcp src outdoors:

  Hello

  I can't understand, I VPN client, I am able to "numbering" to my PIX 515E 7.2 (2) w / ASDM 5.2 (2), but I can't access what whether on the network, I'm getting one of these famouse 'no group translation found for tcp src outside:192.168.1.129/49175 dst inside:192.168.1.251/65535. ' No matter what I do...

  can someone help me out here please?

  Thank you

  You're welcome dmitry. Can I ask you to start a new conversation for Windows auth and finalize this issue of assessment + choice of post "solved my problem?

  Concerning

• DMVPN and INTERNET VIA HUB RENTAL ISSUES

  Hello everyone,

  I really wish you can help me with the problem I have.

  I explain. I test a double Hub - double DMVPN Layout for a client before we set it up in actual production.
  The client has sites where routers are behind some ISP routers who do NAT.

  

  How things are configured:

  -All rays traffic must go through the location of the hub if no local internet traffic on the rays.
  -Hub 1 and 2 hub sends a default route to rays through EIGRP. But only Hub 1 is used.
  -Hub 1 is the main router to DMVPN. In case of connection / hardware failure of the Internet Hub 2 become active for DMVPN and Internet.
  -Hub 1 and 2 hub are both connected to an ISP and Internet gateway for rays.
  -Hub 1 and 2 hub are configured with IOS Firewall.
  -On the shelves I used VRF for separate DMVPN routning Global routning table so I could receive a default route of 1 Hub and Hub 2 to carry the traffic of rays to the Internet via the location of the hub

  What works:

  -All rays can have access to the local network to the location of the hub.
  -All the rays can do talk of talk
  -Working for DMVPN failover
  -Rais NOT behind the router NAT ISP (i.e. the public IP address) directly related to their external interface can go Internet via hub location and all packages are inspected properly by the IOS and Nat firewall properly
   
  What does not work:

  -Rays behind the NAT ISP router can not access Internet via Hub location. They can reach a local network to the location of the hub and talk of talks.
  IOS Firewall Router hub shows packages from rays of theses (behind a NAT) with a source IP address that is the router og PSI of public IP address outside the interface. Not the private address LAN IP back spoke.
  In addition, the packets are never natted. If I do some captge on an Internet Server, the private source IP is the IP LAN to the LAN behind the rays. This means that the hub, router nat never these packages.

  How to solve this problem?

  / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Tabel - Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 cm 5.4pt cm 0 5.4pt ; mso-para-margin : 0 cm ; mso-para-marge-bottom : .0001pt ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-bidi-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-bidi-theme-font : minor-bidi ;}

  Well I don't know that's why I need your help/advice :-)

  I don't know that if I have to configure a VRF on the location of the hub gets also like things might mess upward.

  The problem seems to be NAT - T the rays that are not behind a NAT, among which go over the Internet through a Hub and inspection of Cisco IOS and NAT are trying to find.

  I tested today with the customer at the start them talking behind nat could ping different server on the Internet but not open an HTTP session. DNS was to find work. The IOS Firewall has been actually

  inspection of packages with private real IP address. Then I thought it was a MTU issue, so I decided to do a ping on the Internet with the largest MTU size and suddenly the pings were no more.

  I could see on the router Hub1 IOS Firewall was inspecting the public IP of the ISP NAT router again alongside with rays and not more than the actual IP address private. Really strange!

  Attached files:

  I attach the following files: a drawing of configuration called drawing-Lab - Setup.jpeg | All files for HUB1, BRANCH1 and BRANCH2 ISP-ROUTER configs, named respectively: HUB1.txt, BRANCH1.txt, BRANCH2.txt and ISP - ROUTER .txt

  Hub1 newspapers when ping host 200.200.200.200 on the Internet of Branch2 (behind the NAT ISP router):

  Branch2 #ping vrf DMVPN-VRF 200.200.200.200 source vlan 100

  Type to abort escape sequence.
  Send 5, echoes ICMP 100 bytes to 200.200.200.200, time-out is 2 seconds:
  Packet sent with a source address of 192.168.110.1
  .....
  Success rate is 0% (0/5)

  * 06:04:51.017 Jul 15 UTC: % FW-6-SESS_AUDIT_TRAIL_START: start session icmp: initiator (110.10.10.2:8) - answering machine (200.200.200.200:0)

  If the IOS Firewall does not inspect the true private source IP address that can be, in this case: 192.168.110.2. He sess on the public IP address.

  HUB1 #sh ip nat translations
  Inside global internal local outside global local outdoor Pro
  ICMP 80.10.10.2:1 80.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1
  ICMP 80.10.10.2:2 80.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2
  UDP 80.10.10.2:4500 80.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500

  There is no entry for packets of teas present NAT

  Captge on Tunnel 1 on Hub1 interface (incoming packets in):

  7 7.355997 192.168.110.1 200.200.200.200 request ICMP (ping) echo
  So that the firewall controllable IOS to the 110.10.10.2:8 public IP sniffing capture said that the package come from private real IP address

  Inhalation of vapours on the server (200.200.200.200) with wireshark:

  114 14.123552 192.168.110.1 200.200.200.200 request ICMP (ping) echo

  If the private IP address of source between local network of BRANCH2 is never natted by HUB1

  If the server sees the address source IP private not natted although firewall IOS Hub1 inspect the public IP address 110.10.10.2:8

  Hub1 newspapers when ping host 200.200.200.200 on the Internet of Branch1 (not behind the NAT ISP router):

  Branch1 #ping vrf DMVPN-VRF 200.200.200.200 source vlan 100

  Type to abort escape sequence.
  Send 5, echoes ICMP 100 bytes to 200.200.200.200, time-out is 2 seconds:
  Packet sent with a source 192.168.100.1 address
  !!!!!

  * 06:05:18.217 Jul 15 UTC: % FW-6-SESS_AUDIT_TRAIL_START: start session icmp: initiator (192.168.100.1:8) - answering machine (200.200.200.200:0)

  This is so the firewall sees the actual private IP which is 192.168.100.1

  HUB1 #sh ip nat translations
  Inside global internal local outside global local outdoor Pro
  ICMP 80.10.10.2:1 80.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1
  ICMP 80.10.10.2:2 80.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2
  UDP 80.10.10.2:4500 80.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500
  ICMP 80.10.10.2:22 192.168.100.1:22 200.200.200.200:22 200.200.200.200:22

  The real private source IP address is also find natted 1 Hub outside the public IP address

  Captge on Tunnel 1 on Hub1 interface (incoming packets in):

  8 7.379997 192.168.100.1 200.200.200.200 request ICMP (ping) echo

  Real same as inspected by IOS Firewall so all private IP address is y find.

  Inhalation of vapours on the server (200.200.200.200) with wireshark:

  / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Tabel - Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 cm 5.4pt cm 0 5.4pt ; mso-para-margin : 0 cm ; mso-para-marge-bottom : .0001pt ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-bidi-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-bidi-theme-font : minor-bidi ;}

  67 10.441153 80.10.10.2 200.200.200.200 request ICMP (ping) echo

  So, here's all right. The address is natted correctly.

  __________________________________________________________________________________________

  Best regards

  Laurent

  Hello

  Just saw your message, I hope this isn't too late.

  I don't know what your exact problem, but I think we can work through it to understand it.

  One thing I noticed was that your NAT ACL is too general. You need to make it more

  specific.  In particular, you want to make sure that it does not match the coming of VPN traffic

  in to / out of the router.

  For example you should not really have one of these entries in your NAT translation table.

  HUB1 #sh ip nat translations
  Inside global internal local outside global local outdoor Pro
  ICMP 80.10.10.2:1 80.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1
  ICMP 80.10.10.2:2 80.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2
  UDP 80.10.10.2:4500 80.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500

  Instead use:

  Nat extended IP access list
  deny ip any 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 connect
  allow an ip
  deny ip any any newspaper

  If you can use:

  Nat extended IP access list
  deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 connect
  IP 192.168.0.0 allow 0.0.255.255 everything
  deny ip any any newspaper

  Also, I would be very careful with the help of the "log" keyword in an ACL, NAT.

  I saw problems.

  What are the IOS versions do you use?

  Try to make changes to the NAT so that you no longer see the entries of translation NAT

  for packages of NAT - T (UDP 4500) in the table of translation NAT on the hub. It may be

  This puts a flag on the package structure, that IOS Firewall and NAT is

  pick up on and then do the wrong thing in this case.

  If this does not work then let me know.

  Maybe it's something for which you will need to open a TAC case so that we can

  This debug directly on your installation.

  Mike.

• ORA-00980: synonym translation is no longer valid

  I have a two databases. CARRIER_DEV and TRANSPORT_DEV. Everything works fine in Oracle 11 g, but when we migrated to Oracle12c, INFO_FUNC (service Oracle) residing in CARRIER_DEV under carrier scheme is called TRANSPORT_DEV, throwing the ORA-01775: synonym of closure chain. which caused ~ 9 invalid objects.

  SELECT INFO_FUNC('1','NAME') FROM DUAL; This has been called TRANSPORT_DEV.

  The DB of TRANSPORT_DEV to CARRIER_DEV link has been created to help

  CREATE THE DATABASE LINK RCAR PUBLIC
  CONNECT TO CARRIER_USR
  IDENTIFIED BY < PWD >
  With the HELP of ' Carrier_dev. WORLD ';
  
  We have created the synonym and gave the CARRIER_DEV necessary.
  
  CREATE THE INFO_FUNC FOR CARRIER.INFO_FUNC PUBLIC SYNONYM;
  GRANT EXECUTE ON CARRIER.INFO_FUNC TO CARRIER_USR;
  
  Transport_dev database,
  
  I created the following synonym to access the CARRIER.INFO_FUNC
  
  CREATE THE INFO_FUNC PUBLIC SYNONYM FOR "PUBLIC".INFO_FUNC@RCAR;
  
  After analysis of the issue, I found that the public synonym in Transport_dev uses 'PUBLIC' as a schema instead of CARRIER name. (It works fine in Oracle 11 g. Explain what is 'PUBLIC' means here).
  
  So I decided to use the name of schema instead of 'PUBLIC '.
  
  CREATE THE INFO_FUNC FOR CARRIER.INFO_FUNC@RCAR PUBLIC SYNONYM;
  
  After this change, all invalid objects went into Oracle 12 c, but a new problem came.
  
  SELECT INFO_FUNC('1','NAME') FROM DUAL;  This SQL sataement now gives ORA-00980: synonym translation is no longer valid
  
  SELECT INFO_FUNC@RCAR('1','NAME') FROM DUAL; also gives the same error.

  
  CARRIER_DEV the database

  
  CREATE TABLE CARRIER. CARRIER_NAME
  (
  NAME_SEQ_NO NUMBER OF NON-NULL,
  LNAME VARCHAR2 (50 BYTE),
  FNAME VARCHAR2 (20 BYTE),
  MNAME VARCHAR2 (20 BYTE),
  VARCHAR2 (10 BYTE) SUFFIX
  );

  CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION CARRIER. "" INFO_FUNC "(pin_in VARCHAR2, field_in VARCHAR2: = 'TEST')
  RETURN VARCHAR2
  IS
  tmpVar VARCHAR2 (100);

  BEGIN
  
  SELECT lname | ',' | fname | » '|| mname | » '|| suffix
  IN tmpVar
  OF Carrier_Name
  WHERE name_seq_no = pin_in;
  
  END INFO_FUNC;
  /

  CREATE THE INFO_FUNC FOR CARRIER.INFO_FUNC PUBLIC SYNONYM;
  GRANT EXECUTE ON CARRIER.INFO_FUNC TO CARRIER_USR;
  
  In TRANSPORT_DEV
  
  CREATE THE INFO_FUNC FOR CARRIER.INFO_FUNC@RCAR PUBLIC SYNONYM;

  Please guide me.
  
  

  I've recreated the DBLink from TRANSPORT_DEV to CARRIER_DEV. The problem disappeared. Thank you for your help

  1. Re-create the synonym.
  2. Recreate the DBLink

• Translation of HFM entity Currency Adjustment and roll-up to the parent entities

  Hello

  I hope someone can help me understand why a Currency Adjustment amount entity does not and the roll-up for the entities of parents to the two accounts used in a journal entry. See below for more details:

  Journal entry

  

  After you run a "consolidate all Data with ' , I see the following results in Smart View:

  

  I was expecting to see the amount of translated paper winding to entities parent as indicated below in red (I manually added the Red amounts for demonstration):

  

  In addition, the translation done by the system uses EOMRate instead of PREVEOMRate exchange currency. 0115 account is the P & L account type and should be translated by using PREVEOMRate.

  I really appreciate any help you can provide.

  Thank you

  Carmen G.

  Hi Carmen,.

  I'm glad that you found the solution.

  However, I wouldn't consider the flag of Type switch to sink as a problem, but you have a better understanding of the issue.

  If you have any questions, can you please close the topic because it is too long?

  See you soon,.

  Thanos