two table Merge

Similar Questions

• Merge two tables 2D?

  Hello

  I have a question about the merger of the two 2D arrays. I have a program that generates two tables different interms of binary digits (attached file) and I wanted to arrange them as below.

  The first generation of table: 1110

  1101

  1011

  0111

  Second generated table: 0001

  0010

  0100

  1000

  Output should be: 1110

  0001

  1101

  0010

  1011

  0100

  0111

  1000

  Thank you.

  Hello

  Order the attached VI

  Kind regards

  Amine31

  (Give congratulations to good answers and Mark as a Solution If your problem is resolved)

• Merge two tables to a view

  I have two tables I have merged into a single view.
  All rows from both tables to merge into a single view.
  
  Not table 1 no criteria:

  MATERIAL     PLANT     QUANTITY     UNIT     POSTING_DATE

  Table 2 criteria:

  MATERIAL     PLANT     SALES_QUANTITY     UNIT     POSTING_DATE     RECORD_TYPE
  Where RECORD_TYPE IN('O','U')

  The view should look like this:

  MATERIAL     PLANT     QUANTITY     UNIT     POSTING_DATE

  I'm not going anywhere, what should I do?

  Hello

  Maybe you want something like this:

  CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW  table_1_and_ou_from_2
  AS
       --
  SELECT     material, plant,       quantity, unit, posting_date
  FROM     table1
       --
  UNION ALL
          --
  SELECT     material, plant, sales_quantity, unit, posting_date
  FROM     table2
  WHERE     record_type     IN ('O', 'U')
  ;
  

  The columns in the view will have the same names that the columns of the 1st branch of the UNION, then the 3rd column will be called quantity, not sales_quantity.

  I hope that answers your question.
  Otherwise, then, as mentioned above, post a small example data (CREATE TABLE and only relevant columns, INSERT statements) for all of the tables involved and also publish outcomes from these data (that is, the content of the view).
  Explain, using specific examples, how you get these results from these data.
  Always say what version of Oracle you are using (for example, 11.2.0.2.0).
  See the FAQ forum {message identifier: = 9360002}

• Comparing the sum of the two tables and correct by difference of amount in its second t

  Hello guys,.
  
  I have a very difficult task that I can't get my head around.
  The sample data looks like this:
  
  Master table
  Request - booking - debit - credit - MasterAmout
  1------------1----------------D---------------------------------15.3
  1------------2----------------D---------------------------------480.6
  1------------3------------------------------C-------------------496.8
  ------------------------------------------- 0.9
  
  
  The slave table
  Demande---reservation---debit---credit---slaveamout---slavecorrection
  1------------1------------D------------------------------------15.3---------------14.5
  1------------2------------D------------------------------------480.6-------------480.6
  1------------3-----------------------------C-------------------496---------------496
  -------------------------------------------0.1--------------------------------------0.9
  
  
  The reservation have a total amount of 0.1, but must be corrected to 0.9 because the main table has 0.9.
  
  Reservation 1 requires a correction so the slave table also has a total of 0.9 (business rule is, only corrections on the first booking). So we have
  to change the amount of 15.3 to 14.5. I plan my SQL like this:
  
  1 reservations sum of two tables for each claim. Compare the two for each individual claim.
  2. If Captain sum the amount shows a difference between master / slave
  2.1 select top 1 table reservation slave for the specific claim and increase/decrease by the difference of these two amounts.
  
  Who is?

  Hello

  Use MERGE to actually do the UPDATE.
  The ROW_NUMBER analytic function to identify the first booking in slave (unless you can count on which the reservation = 1).

  MERGE INTO     slave     dst
  USING     (
       WITH     master_summary     AS
       (
            SELECT       claim
            ,       SUM ( master_ampount * CASE
                                     WHEN  debit  = 'D'  THEN -1
                                     WHEN  credit = 'C'  THEN  1
                                 END
                       )     AS balance
            FROM       master
            GROUP BY  claim
       )
       SELECT     s.claim
       ,     s.booking
       ,     SUM ( s.slave_amount * CASE
                              WHEN  s.debit  = 'D'  THEN -1
                              WHEN  s.credit = 'C'  THEN  1
                             END
                ) OVER (PARTITION BY  claim) - m.balance     AS diff
       ,     ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY  claim
                           ORDER BY        booking
                         )     AS r_num
       FROM     master_summary     m
       JOIN     slave          s  ON     m.claim     = s.claim
       )          src
  ON     (     src.claim     = dst.claim
       AND     src.r_num     = 1
       )
  WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE
  SET     dst.debit      = CASE
                      WHEN src.diff      <  0 THEN 'D'
                                     ELSE NULL
                   END
  ,     dst.credit      = CASE
                      WHEN src.diff      <  0 THEN NULL
                                     ELSE 'C'
                   END
  ,     dst.slaveamount = ABS (src.diff)
  ;
  

  If you would care to CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements for the sample data (showing the two tables, as they exist before the DML) then I could test this.

  The design of history seems very uncomfortable. Instead of the debit and credit columns, it would be much simpler to have positive and negative amounts. Is it really worth now both not corrected and corrected the amounts in the table on the slave, especially if you keep only versions corrected debit and credit columns?

• compare two tables and update the differences

  Hi all
  Sorry for the newbie question, but I am a beginner in the present.
  
  I have two tables, both have same structure-
  
  CODE - code NUMBER (6,0) store is the primary key does not change and is unique
  ADDRESS1
  ADDRESS2
  ADDRESS3 - all VARCHAR2 (100)
  
  One of the tables is named MASTER, the other being updated. MASTER contains hundreds of lines, while the table of UPDATES may have anywhere from zero to 10 or more.
  I want to compare the table of UPDATES against the MASTER of the table and if there is a difference, ask the differences in the table in UPDATES to the MASTER of table - so if the address of an Exchange store, then the change is reflected in the MASTER table by crushing with the data contained in the UPDATES table.
  
  I thought that maybe using sliders and compare each field but there must be a more efficient way.
  
  I hope that I have explained quite clearly... any help would be greatly appreciated.
  
  Thank you
  Bill

  Education MERGE, assuming that your version supports supported the MERGER.

  SY.

• Two tables

  I have two tables;
  First data table
  second table also with data, but it will check with the first prod_code table, if the prod_code is not in the first table it will insert the values of the second array to the first table on the other not...
  
  SQL > declare
  2 cursor stk_val is
  3 select prod_code, prod_desc, prod_tran bal_Stock;
  4 mProd_code prod_tran.prod_Code%type;
  prod_tran.prod_desc%type mProd_desc 5;
  mProd_qty 6 prod_tran.prod_qty%type;
  7 whole valexits;
  8 whole bal_stock;
  9 whole vquantity;
  10 whole f_itemcheck;
  Begin 11
  12 stk_val open;
  loop 13
  14 stk_val of fetch in mprod_code, mprod_desc, mprod_qty;
  15 exit when stk_val % notfound;
  16 valexits: = f_itemcheck (mprod_code);
  17 if valexits = 0 then
  18. insert into prod_mast (prod_code, prod_Desc, bal_Stock)
  19 values(mprod_code,mprod_Desc,mprod_qty);
  20 elsif valexits = 1 then
  Update 21 prod_mast
  22 set bal_stock = bal_stock + vquantity
  23 where prod_code = mprod_code;
  24 end if;
  25 end of loop;
  26 close stk_Val;
  27 end;
  28.
  Declare
  *
  ERROR on line 1:
  ORA-06550: line 3, column 34:
  PLS-00320: the declaration of the type of the expression is incomplete or incorrect
  ORA-06550: line 3, column 6:
  PL/SQL: SQL statement ignored
  ORA-06550: line 16, column 22:
  PLS-00222: no function with name 'F_ITEMCHECK' does exist in this scope
  ORA-06550: line 16, column 10:
  PL/SQL: Statement ignored

  Hello
  (1) I am convinced that you can use merge ehre and avoid a slow row-by-row processing.
  (2) vquantity when you set this value?

  For education Merge ehre is the link.
  [http://www.psoug.org/reference/merge.html]

  See you soon!
  Bobin

• How to make an update of a view online two tables...

  When the unique constraint of the second table includes three columns?
  
  I have two tables A and B and I want to update a table column, one using an update of a view online two tables.
  
  Table A:
  col1 primary key
  col2
  
  Table B:
  col1 u1
  col2 u2
  COL3 u3
  COL4
  col5
  
  Table col1 primary key, table B has a unique constraint on col1, col2 and col3.
  
  Tables A and B are joined in this way:
  

  select  A.col1, A.col2 as KEY_OLD, B.col5 as KEY_NEW
  from    A, B
  where (B.col1 = 'literal_1') and (B.col2 = 'literal_2') and (A.col1 = B.col3) and (A.col2 = B.col4)

  And now, I want to update this view and set KEY_OLD = KEY_NEW.
  
  Because of the first three conditions in the where clause for each entry in the table A there is just a matching entry in the table B.
  So the table should be preserved in the join key.
  
  But during the update
  

  update (select  A.col1, A.col2 as KEY_OLD, B.col5 as KEY_NEW
              from    A, B
              where (B.col1 = 'literal_1') and (B.col2 = 'literal_2') and (A.col1 = B.col3) and (A.col2 = B.col4)
             )
  set     KEY_OLD = KEY_NEW;

  I get an error ORA-01779.
  
  I did the updates on inline views this way several times in recent weeks and it work very well.
  But so far the unique constraint on the table B was just a column ;-)
  
  So what I need is to make it work with the unique constraint on the application of the three-column table B.
  
  Thank you very much in advance for any help.
  
  Hartmut cordially

  Preserved key criteria must be met by the join columns, the optimizer does not agree (in fact I never tried in 11g) just a combination of columns, literals and join.

  The alternatives you have are subqueries online (which as you point out can do rather worse), the command MERGE or indicator BYPASS_UJVC semi undocumented.

• I need to save two tables 1 d to Excel in version 8.2

  Hello

  I can't find good examples for labview 8.2.

  I have two tables 1 d of 1024 items. I need to save each other in another column of an excel file.

  How can I do?

  Thank you.

  Hello

  You can use the spread worksheet function to save data in Excel. File extension should be .xls as test.xls

• I want to compare two tables and out a boolean

  This should be simple.  I want to compare two tables (5 items) and return a single Boolean value (T/F), not an array of Boolean.

  Thank you

  Kevin

  Right click on the comparison, the comparison mode, select compare the aggregates.

• Display two tables 1 d on Wavechart

  Hello

  How to display two tables 1 d of the same size on a WaveChart

  Thank you.

  No, aid is correct, if wire you a table 2D to waveform curve, you can transpose it in the context menu as follows:

  

  Checking / unchecking this option has the same effect than to put a 2D conversion table before you wire your table in the waveform table.

• Attach the two tables

  I have two tables I want to fix the end to end.  If I use the version table it creates an annexed table which is not what I want.  essntially im doing the opposite of WBS.  are there features that fit this description?

  in fact, I just found out 'insert into array' worked for me.  I'll try you method too next time

• graph drawn using two tables

  I have two table with 50 elements. I tried to draw a xy chart using these two tables. but the graph is not... someone can help me?

  Use build to set new values in an existing table, at the end.  Store the array between iterations of your loop for the use of shift registers.

  

• compare two table with cluster inside

  Hello

  I want to compare two tables containing a cluster with several groups in it. When you use the equal the result is the same pattern as the cluster of entry. But I just need a true or false. It doesn't bother me that it changed on position 1 or any other position.

  Is there an elegant way to do it?

  Thanks for any help.

  Yves

  Right-click equality and change to compare aggregations. That, or add a table and later.

  /Y

• Combine two tables 1 d in a 2D array

  Hi all

  Maybe I forget what is obvious, but I can't find a solution to combine two tables 1 d in a 2D array AND (it is the impossible part for me) using the tables columns instead of lines.

  Example:

  Table 1:1, 2, 3, 4

  Table 2:5, 6, 7, 8

  Result: 1, 5

  2, 6

  3, 7

  4, 8

  The 'build array' function seems to add all tables as lines... I guess I could transpose the table, but I want it runs in a Subvi in constructions of different loop and I feel a little uncomfortable with it - I guess one would be left with a completely mixed table. I was maybe blind just to find the right function?

  Cheers, Jessi

  Hi Jessi,

  by default, LV is combining tables in rows. So when you need columns you must transpose the sets or use a different indexing scheme...

• Question: two tables in a pool, load balancing, etc.

  Hello

  So I'm sort of confused about how it works.  I know I can put two tables that are part of the same group in the same pool, and I know I can create a volume that spans the two tables and the EQL will spread the volume also between two boxes, etc etc.

  My question, I guess that is the reliability...  Have I missed something or that seems like a "RAID 0" type thing between two EQLs?  I mean, if the volume is divided between the two boxes, how can I ever do a reset on a box?   What happens if one of the EQL breaks down?  What I lose this entire volume?

  What Miss me?   Or is it how it really works?

  I'm kind of fear put anything in production where a failure on a device would kill everything like that.

  Any explanation would be appreciated.

  The button is named "restart" and launch of a failover of the MC Eve always. Yes, there is no complete reboot option or task.

  Well... is the same "risk" to have a storage with multiple heads and a few shelves of extension. If storage with Betclic or groups on disc on shelves and you lose a comprehensive shelf, you're in trouble.

  In theory the risk increases if you put more members to a pool, because a volume divided on 3 volume by default. But it is a softlimit and you can adjust the distribution of volume more or less members. If you have a volume that is large and 3 members cannot provide this ability, he can go 4 or more members. The largest volume spreads i never saw in all 8 members.  Spread of the volumes between the members, that's how EQL scales on.

  If you do not as you turn this option off or copy your data with SyncRep option.

  Kind regards

  Joerg