Unable to VPN from the inside to another site

Similar Questions

• hp5610: unable to print from the internet regardless of search engine

  I'm unable to print from the internet regardless of internet search engine. I ran the impression scanning hp doctor who shows no match port, I don't know what that means. What I've tried is; power off printer, internet modem and usb ports restarted, changed, cable and ethernet cable. This problem has been resolved before by switching engines, this has no effect now. Help

  Mikev

  Welcome to the community of HP @mikiev,

  I read your current and previous posts about how you can't print from the internet, and I wanted to answer you with my suggestions. I understand that you have tried to use different however search engines, try to return to my colleague's response @RnRMusicMan on the link below and try to use another web browser altogether. Again, if you use Google Chrome, try Firefox or Internet Explorer.

  • problems printing from the internet

  If Chrome and Firefox will not print, try printing from NotePad, which is a program that is preinstalled on your system to see if the draws work from there.

  You can also try uninstalling and reinstalling Google Chrome or Firefox, whatever one you use often, to see if that helps the printing problem.

  Let me know what is happening and we can go from there!

  Good luck

• Launch .chm from the inside of the table of contents

  I am launching a file .chm from the table of contents of another .chm file. I was able to launch the new .chm with a button in a topic, but can not understand how it start from the inside of the table of contents. Any suggestions?

  Thank you!

  Hello

  I believe that I have documented this in my tips and tricks file.

  Click here to view the download page

  See you soon... Rick

  Start learning HTML RoboHelp 7 days - $24.95! Click here for authorized Adobe Captivate and RoboHelp HTML training Click here for the SorcerStone Blog Click here for RoboHelp and Captivate eBooks

• (2003 server) error 2019: the server was unable to allocate from the system non-paged pool because the pool was empty

  Hello

  I have a Windows 2003 server and get error (Server 2003) 2019: the server was unable to allocate from the system non-paged pool because the pool was empty.

  If anyone has encountered this error and has an instruction step by step to solve this problem please let me know.

  appreciate the help!

  Sincerely,

  Riaz

  This issue is beyond the scope of this site (for consumers) and to be sure, you get the best (and fastest) reply, we have to ask either on Technet (for IT Pro) or MSDN (for developers)
  *

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home s/fr-U.S./Accueil
  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/Forum
  
  
  If you give us a link to the new thread we can point to some resources it

• Unable to print from the Internet using HP printer psc 1210

  Original title: hp psc 1210 printer xannot can be identified by my laptop Viao soni

  I'm unable to print from the internet. This problem has not occurred before.
  What should I do or change the setting to be able to print again.
  Thanks for your help.
  Darius
  

  Hi Nicolas,.

  This problem may occur if the printer driver is corrupted, outdated or incompatible.

  1. what web browser do you use?

  2. the problem occurs with all web browsers?

  3. deal with any problem while printing from the computer?

  4. do you receive any error messages? If Yes, what is the exact error message?

  Method 1:
  I suggest you try the procedure described in the article, if you are using Internet Explorer 9.

  You receive a script error and are unable to print from Internet Explorer 9
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/2652062

  Method 2:
  If the problem is not resolved, I suggest you try the procedure described in the article and see if it helps.

  I can't print or preview before printing a Web page in Internet Explorer
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/973479

  You can check the link for more information:

  Solve printer problems
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/printer-problems-in-Windows-help#fix-printer-problems=Windows-7&V1H=win8tab1&V2H=win7tab1&V3H=winvistatab1&v4h=winxptab1

  Hope this information helps. Answer the post with an up-to-date issue report to help you further.

• Alienware X 51 R1 unable to boot from the CD

  I've noticed lately that my x-51 R1 running Windows 7, is unable to boot from the CD/DVD drive using the UEFI. I tried with a CD of Linux for the class, and I'm trying to reset my HP MediaSmart Server old ancestors via a disk recovery and in two attempts, the computer will boot directly from the HARD drive.

  Installation boot is CD/DVD, USB, CD/DVD or HARD drive.

  UEFI BIOS is

  Computer is running that Windows 7 Home Premium, Intel i3-2120 3.3 GHz bought in December 2012.

  Any help would be appreciated, I will try to answer all questions as well.

  Calling Customer Service would be good, but they try to charge me...

  The UEFI boot sequence does not take too kindly to optical drives. It is best to make a USB bootable using Rufus:

  http://Rufus.AKEO.IE/

  For an example, see here:

  http://dellwindowsreinstallationguide.com/converting-your-Dell-Windows-reinstallation-DVD-into-a-reinstallation-USB/

  If you make a recovery media using the latest version of Respawn Alienware be sure to use USB (USB key or external hard drive USB) and not a DVD media:

  http://dellwindowsreinstallationguide.com/Dell-backup-and-recovery-1-8-1-71/

• I have download ESXi 3.5 VMware site, write on CD, but unable to boot from the CD, why? ESXi installation does not

  I have download ESXi 3.5 VMware site, write on CD, but unable to boot from the CD, why? ESXi installation does not occur.

  Please help on this issue.

  Since there is no integration PAM for ESXi, you cannot authenticate to ESXi itself using active directory.  -What are you talking about?  You can always have virtual machine with windows and active directory.

  -KjB

  VMware vExpert

• Update problems, I just reinstalled XP pro and I can't get the updates from the windows update web site

  I just reinstalled XP pro and I can't get the updates from the windows update web site. Whats up with this please help

  There is no way that anyone might be able to help without more. My initial guess and it is just a guess, is that you have to update Internet Explorer .v8. Click HERE and download IE8 and install it. Try again updates once the installation is complete.

• VPN SSL from the inside on the external interface

  Hi all

  First of all I know that I can activate the SSL interface inside, but that's not what I need or want.

  Scenario:

  Several interfaces and VLAN on the SAA (running 8.0.5).

  SSL VPN configured and enabled on the external interface.

  Need to know if it is possible to access the SSL VPN from other interfaces directly to the IP address external interface, something like her hairpin.

  Possible a solution (if it exists) with or without NAT (I have public IPs on some interfaces).

  This will be useful for users who can connect any interface (inside, outside, or other) and with only a DNS record, I'll be able to manage everything.

  Concerning

  PS: Is DNS doctoring an option? The tests that I have done this does not work.

  Post edited by: rcordeiro

  Hello

  Unfortunately, it is not possible. You cannot communicate with an ASA interface which is not directly connected through the firewall.

  Kind regards

  NT

• You try to run a Site to site VPN and remote VPN from the same IP remotely

  We currently have a site to site VPN configuration between our offices call center and a 3rd party that allows them to access our training to their employees to use environment while being trained on our systems. This tunnel is running between our ASA and their ASA without problem; However, when we have managers come out to the call center, they are unable to use remote VPN to access our office.

  Apparently the same IP peer remote that we use for our site to the other tunnel is the same IP that our managers use to access the internet when they are on-site with the customer. When I look at the logs it shows the VPN attempt and then I get treatment Information Exchange has failed. So from what I can understand when our managers are trying to connect to our firewall from the same IP address as the counterpart of site to site it automatically tries to create a tunnel, according to the information of the site to the other tunnel. If our managers are anywhere else, they can connect through remote VPN with no problems.

  My question is if anyone knows of a way to make the firewall allow VPN site to site and remote connections with the same remote IP address.

  Hi John,.

  Basically, in older versions, when you hit a static encryption card and you does not match this static encryption completely map the connection continues until the dynamic encryption card. For this reason, you can connect your IPSec clients before. A bug has been opened on this vulnerability.

  CSCuc75090  Details of bug

  The crypto IPSec Security Association are created by dynamic crypto map to static peers

  Symptom:

  When a static VPN peer adds all traffic to the ACL crypto, a surveillance society is based even if the pair IP is not allowed in the acl to the main façade encryption. Are these SA finally put in correspondence and commissioning the dynamic crypto map instance.

  Conditions:

  It was a planned design since the first day that allowed customers to fall through in the case of static crypto map did not provide a necessary cryptographic services.

  The SA must be made from a peer configured statically and a dynamic crypto map instance must be configured on the receiving end.

  Workaround solution:

  N/A

  Some possible workarounds are:

  Configure a static nat device when you try to use the remote VPN if the firewall remotely will be hit with a different public IP address. It would be a good solution, but it will depend on how many ip addresses public you have available, if you really want one of these ip addresses for that access.

  Also, I thought you could use AnyConnect instead of the IPSec VPN client. I don't know how many users need to connect from your PC to the remote site, but the ASA has 2 licenses SSL available that you could use. Because Anyconnect uses the SSL protocol, it won't have a problem on your environment.

  Below some information:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ASA/asa84/configuration/guide/asa_84_cli_config/vpn_anyconnect.html

  Hope this helps,

  Luis.

• a public access remote vpn from an inside interface asa 5505

  I'm trying to see if it is possible to accomplish what I am trying. I have an ASA 5505 with the following configuration.

  1. There is an external connection, connected to the ISP. Let's say that it is 10.1.1.1/24 for ease. There is a remote VPN configuration as the access of people through this interface.

  2. There's the inside network, which is the normal LAN. It's cable system in the office. to say that it is 172.20.0.1/24.

  3. There is a wireless network on a VLAN separate called WLAN. It has an IP of 192.168.1.1/24. There is an ACL allowing traffic to that VLAN to the public internet.

  Essentially, I would like users to be able to use the same VPN settings they use when connecting from outside of the Office when you are connected to WIFI.

  Also, I would like that they can access public IP addresses that I have NAT would be to internal servers. In this way, they can use IP addresses when they use on the public internet.

  Is this possible?

  Hello

  Well that's not going to be possible, the only thing you can really do is to activate the crypto map on the WLAN facing interface, by design, you cannot not access VPN, ping or manage the device on an interface which is not directly connected to you.

  I hope this helps.

  Mike

• Cannot ping inside the ASA from the inside interface

  Don't know what I did wrong... appreciate any help

  Here is the page layout

  laptop--> cisco 3750 switch--> ASA5505 firewall--> future VPN tunnel

  Laptop, switch interface VLAN and inside the ASA are all in the same subnet

  Switch and ASA have all interfaces local network VIRTUAL 52 (the subnet in question), except for the external interface

  -----------------

  This is the problem

  laptop getting ip addressing and def GW via DHCP from the firewall

  switch and FW can ping each other without problem

  FW can't ping, still gets the DHCP scope.

  Thank you

  Dave

  Hello

  How did you setup?

  The laptop is connected to a port of the 3750 (VLAN 52).

  The connection between the 3750 and the SAA is a chest or a link L3?

  If the 3750 has a SVI belonging to VLAN52, you can ping from the correct PC? As well as the ASA?

  Federico.

• How to install Windows XP SP1 from the disc and not an error message indicating "unable to install from the web?"

  My laptop with Windows XP home (2002, upgraded to SP3), crashed after almost 10 years of perfect service. Then I reinstalled my OS (not OEM, bought and paid for a full installation of Windows XP Home, 2002), and after 3 hands hours hardware controllers and drivers, installation was finally able to connect to internet to make updates on Windows XP and hardware. Arriving at Windows Update of the site, I realized that I couldn't do web updates up-to-date, because my old version of Windows. It will not be updated to SP3, because I need SP1 or higher. So, I tried to download and install SP1a. Error says that I can not reach the server. So, I download SP1a on my other computer, burn a CD and try to install SP1a directly from CD. Now, I get an error message stating "error installing SP1a, unable to reach the server. Try again when you have access to the web... Hello! I'm not trying to install from the web... why this message? I even made my computer has been getting a good connection ethernet, just in case my computer needed to communicate with? While my computer has been updated by CD.

  It's probably something simple, but I'm frustrated. Help when the first thing I see on the Microsoft Update site is a special page, telling me that I am not able to update Windows. Help, please!

  You must use this upgrade path:
  Gold XP to XP SP2 to XP SP3.
  Note that installing SP1a is TOTALLY USELESS! (Not only that, the file available these days is EVIL, because you knew.)
  Here are the detailed instructions:

  1. download the installation files from SP2, SP3, IE8 and Microsoft Security Essentials, which is an effective antivirus/antimalware program. I prefer to keep these on a USB key, but this is optional. Here are the links to all the installation of three files:

  http://www.Microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?ID=28 (for SP2)

  http://www.Microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?ID=24 (for SP3)

  (You can TOTALLY ignore the message "intended for it professionals"!)

  http://www.Microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?displaylang=en&ID=43 (for IE8)

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/products/security-essentials (for MMS)

  2. disconnect Internet.

  3. temporarily disable the automatic updates.

  4. install SP2. Restart twice.

  5 install the SP3. Restart twice.

  6 switch to IE8. Restart twice.

  7 install an Antivirus software.

  (What happens very often is that someone has their software antivirus running as they try to install SP3, which often translates into chaos! "This is why it must be done after installing SP3 and IE).

  8 make sure that firewall Windows is activated (it should be).

  (Now you can physically reconnect to the Internet.)

  9 visit Windows Update to download and install only the critical security updates.

  10 re - enable automatic updates.

  After the back if you need guidance.

• Cannot access the Web server in the DMZ from the inside using IP global

  Hi all

  I hope it's a very simple question.

  I'm running a PIX 515 firewall v6.3. I set up a Web server in my DMZ and use static NAT for re-branded it overall static IP address. Access from the outside of the demilitarized zone works remarkably well. I can access inside the interface Web site using the internal IP, but I can't access it from inside interface using the global IP are entrusted to him.

  Is there a particular reason why this would not be allowed? My feeling was that the request would be forwarded via the external interface (as it is a global IP address) and then be bounced back by my sense of the ISP the request would come to the new external interface (as the static NAT is applied to the external interface).

  However if I try and access the global IP from my inside interface, then the browser can not find the server.

  can someone explain why this is so? Any information would be appreciated.

  see you soon,

  Wayne

  ---------------------------------

  6.3 (3) version PIX

  interface ethernet0 100full

  interface ethernet1 100full

  interface ethernet2 100full

  ethernet0 nameif outside security0

  nameif ethernet1 inside the security100

  nameif dmz security50 ethernet2

  hostname helmsdeep

  domain p2h.com.sg

  fixup protocol dns-length maximum 512

  fixup protocol ftp 21

  fixup protocol h323 h225 1720

  fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719

  fixup protocol http 80

  fixup protocol they 389

  no correction protocol rsh 514

  fixup protocol rtsp 554

  fixup protocol sip 5060

  fixup protocol sip udp 5060

  fixup protocol 2000 skinny

  fixup protocol smtp 25

  No fixup protocol sqlnet 1521

  fixup protocol tftp 69

  names of

  acl_out list access permit tcp any host 203.169.113.110 eq www

  access-list 90 allow the host tcp 10.1.1.27 all

  pager lines 24

  debug logging in buffered memory

  Outside 1500 MTU

  Within 1500 MTU

  MTU 1500 dmz

  IP address outside pppoe setroute

  IP address inside 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

  dmz 10.1.1.1 IP address 255.255.255.0

  no failover

  failover timeout 0:00:00

  failover poll 15

  No IP failover outdoors

  No IP failover inside

  no failover ip address dmz

  location of PDM 202.164.169.42 255.255.255.255 inside

  location of PDM 202.164.169.42 255.255.255.255 dmz

  location of PDM 10.1.1.26 255.255.255.255 dmz

  location of PDM 10.1.1.26 255.255.255.255 outside

  location of PDM 172.16.16.20 255.255.255.255 outside

  location of PDM 192.168.1.222 255.255.255.255 inside

  history of PDM activate

  ARP timeout 14400

  Global 1 interface (outside)

  Global (dmz) 1 10.1.1.101 - 10.1.1.125

  NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0

  NAT (dmz) 0-list of access 90

  NAT (dmz) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0

  static (dmz, external) 203.169.113.110 10.1.1.27 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  Access-group acl_out in interface outside

  Timeout xlate 03:00

  Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0: CPP 02:00 0:10:00 01:00 h225

  H323 timeout 0:05:00 mgcp 0: sip from 05:00 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00

  Timeout, uauth 0:05:00 absolute

  GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server

  RADIUS Protocol RADIUS AAA server

  AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol

  Enable http server

  http 192.168.1.222 255.255.255.255 inside

  enable floodguard

  string fragment 1

  Console timeout 0

  Terminal width 80

  Code v6 pix or less don't let you have traffic "back" or return flow via the same interface on which it was sent. Having also your bounce back off of an external server traffic is never a good idea, because you won't be able to distinguish which and rogue attacks by spoofing someone outside your network.

  Since you are using pix 6.3 code, you may be able to outside the NAT. Add this static to your config:

  static (dmz, upside down) 203.169.113.110 10.1.1.27 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

  You may need to run a clear xlate after adding the new static statement. Note that the interfaces: it's demilitarized zone, inside inside, dmz.

  I would like to know if it works.

• Œuvres of VPn on the inside of the interface, but not outside

  I have a PIX-525 with UR license.  I tried to get my VPN to work since my iphone over the weekend, but nothing helped.  Then, I changed the interface inside to see if my iMac could connect and bingo!  It worked.  I then tried to log in via the inside of the interface with my iphone and it worked.

  I have connected a PIX-515e and, using the same settings, can connect to the external interface via my iPhone.

  Strange.

  Now, to answer the pressing questions, yes I changed the IP address of the server in my client IPSEC settings to reflect the external and internal interfaces I was testing each of them.  I was using a pré-partagées secret.  Yes, the secret has been entered correctly and they have all matched... Yes, the name of the tunnel has been entered correctly.  I used the database local user for authentication with username/password name (i.e. no certificate of authorization to make things simpler for debugging).  I changed the syslog to debugging and I see absolutely no error when you try to connect my iphone to the external interface (i.e. turn off wifi so I'm on my 3G data network).  The only thing I see is where my iphone hits the external interface and it's disassembly (or whatever his name is) but that's all.

  Why this work like a charm with my PIX-515e and not my PIX-525?  VPN accelerator card in the 525 can be at fault?  The 515e doesn't have the aecellerator card.  No idea why can't I several a VPN connection inside the interface but not outside?

  Hi Tim,.

  Well it's not so much the DNS rewrite that is the problem (if you delete just the keyword dns VPN will still fail) but using the external interface for NAT. So all traffic intended for your address of the external interface is passed to the "gcbrouter", including vpn traffic.

  I'm thinking about a way to solve this problem, but I really can't find anythign right now. Using a different interface will not work because you can have only a single default route.

  I wonder if this would work:

  remove the NAT interface:

  not static (DMZ, external) gcbrouter netmask 255.255.255.255 dns interface

  Replace with PAT interface, i.e. add such a line for each port that you want to be contactable on the DMZ server:

  static interface tcp 80 gcbrouter 80 netmask 255.255.255.255 (DMZ, outside) dns

  static (DMZ, outside) of the 25 gcbrouter 25 netmask 255.255.255.255 tcp interface dns

  etc.

  In all honesty, I have never seen rewriting dns used with PAT so not quite sure if it will work.

  HTH

  Herbert