V3.3.4 replication problems

I just upgraded to 3.3.4, and I see a problem with replication. I have two ACS servers and they are authenticating with a server CrytoCard. So I configured the external DB on both servers to point to it. I created the users and they are underlined as external DB. Everything works perfectly, even failover if I close the services on the main server.

However when I replicate the failover doesn't work anymore. What I see is if I look at a user on the server to backup the password for all users authentication section is 'unknown Radius server. I choose the CryptoCard server and everything works fine again.

Any ideas how I can fix/fix this?

Any help would be appreciated. TAC also works on this subject, but I wanted to see if someone else has experianced this problem.

BTW this forum works on a windows server...

I think we can delete the old entry from the database that ACS will not re-index numbers but am not very sure about this one.

Kind regards

Vivek

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • Upgrade of Windows 2003 to 2012 r2 DC replication problem

    Hello

    I added R2 2012 Windows server to windows 2003 sp2 (primary DC) DC and promotes as DC. After the promotion, I run dcdiag and it shows errors.

    Each of the servers have three NICs connected to different networks.

    Please help me with your expertise since I have to raise this Monday.

    Thank you

    Kind regards

    Charaf-eddine

    Here the dcdiag output new DC

    Directory Server diagnosis

    Perform the initial configuration:

    Trying to find the server at home...

    Home Server = CADPDC1

    * Identified AD forest.
    Made the initial collection of information.

    Make the required initial tests

    Test server: Default-First-Site-Name\CADPDC1

    Commencement of the trial: connectivity

    CADPDC1.engineer.com host name resolution error by

    IPv6 stack.

    WARNING: could not confirm the identity of this server in the

    Directory and names returned by DNS servers. Host name

    fixed error 0x2af9 "host is known."

    ......................... CADPDC1 passed test connectivity

    Primary testing

    Test server: Default-First-Site-Name\CADPDC1

    Commencement of the trial: advertising

    WARNING: DsGetDcName returned information for

    \\cadpdc. Engineer.com, when we tried to reach CADPDC1.

    SERVER IS NO ANSWER or IS NOT considered AS APPROPRIATE.

    ......................... CADPDC1 was not able to test advertising

    Beginning of the test: FrsEvent

    There are warning or error events in the last 24 hours after the

    SYSVOL is shared.  Don't not SYSVOL replication problems can cause

    The Group of political problems.
    ......................... CADPDC1 test FrsEvent

    Commencement of the trial: DFSREvent

    ......................... CADPDC1 test DFSREvent

    Commencement of the trial: SysVolCheck

    ......................... CADPDC1 test SysVolCheck

    Beginning of the test: KccEvent

    ......................... CADPDC1 test KccEvent

    Beginning of the test: KnowsOfRoleHolders

    [CADPDC] DsBindWithSpnEx() failed with the error-2146893022,

    The name main target is incorrect...
    ATTENTION: CADPDC is the owner of the schema, but does not meet the DS RPC

    Bind.

    [CADPDC] LDAP bind failed with error 8341,

    A directory service error has occurred...
    ATTENTION: CADPDC is the owner of the schema, but does not respond to LDAP

    Bind.

    ATTENTION: CADPDC is the owner of the domain, but does not meet the DS RPC

    Bind.

    ATTENTION: CADPDC is the owner of the domain, but does not respond to LDAP

    Bind.

    ATTENTION: CADPDC is the owner of PDC, but does not meet the DS RPC

    Bind.

    ATTENTION: CADPDC is the owner of PDC, but does not respond to the LDAP bind.

    ATTENTION: CADPDC is the owner of RID, but does not meet the DS RPC

    Bind.

    ATTENTION: CADPDC is the owner of RID, but does not respond to the LDAP bind.

    ATTENTION: CADPDC is the owner of Infrastructure Update, but is not

    meet DS RPC Bind.

    ATTENTION: CADPDC is the owner of Infrastructure Update, but is not

    respond to LDAP Bind.

    ......................... CADPDC1 failed test KnowsOfRoleHolders

    Beginning of the test: MachineAccount

    ......................... CADPDC1 test MachineAccount

    Beginning of the test: NCSecDesc

    ......................... CADPDC1 passed test NCSecDesc

    Beginning of the test: NetLogons

    Cannot connect in the NETLOGON share. (\\CADPDC1\netlogon)

    [CADPDC1] An net use or LsaPolicy operation failed with error 67.

    The network name was not found...

    ......................... CADPDC1 failed test NetLogons

    Commencement of the trial: ObjectsReplicated

    ......................... CADPDC1 test ObjectsReplicated

    From test: Replications

    [Check the replications, CADPDC1] A recent replication attempt failed:

    From CADPDC to CADPDC1

    Naming context: DC = ForestDnsZones, DC = engineering, DC = com

    The replication generated an error (-2146893022):

    The name main target is invalid.

    The failure occurred at 2014-06-27 17:05:59.

    The last success occurred at 2014-06-27 17:01:21.

    1 failures have occurred since the last success.

    [Check the replications, CADPDC1] A recent replication attempt failed:

    From CADPDC to CADPDC1

    Naming context: DC = DomainDnsZones, DC = engineering, DC = com

    The replication generated an error (-2146893022):

    The name main target is invalid.

    The failure occurred at 2014-06-27 17:05:59.

    The last success occurred at 2014-06-27 17:01:21.

    1 failures have occurred since the last success.

    [Check the replications, CADPDC1] A recent replication attempt failed:

    From CADPDC to CADPDC1

    Naming context: CN = Schema, CN = Configuration, DC = engineering, DC = com

    The replication generated an error (1727):

    The remote procedure call failed and did not execute.

    The failure occurred at 2014-06-27 17:05:59.

    The last success occurred at 2014-06-27 17:01:06.

    1 failures have occurred since the last success.

    [Check the replications, CADPDC1] A recent replication attempt failed:

    From CADPDC to CADPDC1

    Naming context: CN = Configuration, DC = engineering, DC = com

    The replication generated an error (-2146893022):

    The name main target is invalid.

    The failure occurred at 2014-06-27 17:05:59.

    The last success occurred at 2014-06-27 17:01:07.

    1 failures have occurred since the last success.

    [Check the replications, CADPDC1] A recent replication attempt failed:

    From CADPDC to CADPDC1

    Naming context: DC = engineering, DC = com

    The replication generated an error (-2146893022):

    The name main target is invalid.

    The failure occurred at 2014-06-27 17:05:59.

    The last success occurred at 2014-06-27 17:01:21.

    1 failures have occurred since the last success.

    ......................... CADPDC1 failure test replications

    Beginning of the test: RidManager

    ......................... CADPDC1 failed test RidManager

    Commencement of the trial: Services

    ......................... CADPDC1 test passed Services

    Beginning of the test: SystemLog

    A warning event occurred.  Event ID: 0x000727A5

    Generated time: 27/06/2014-17:01:38

    The event string:

    The WinRM service is not listening to the WS-Management requests.

    A warning event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 80050004

    Generated time: 27/06/2014-17:05:03

    The event string:

    HP 1 GB 2 332T adapter ports Ethernet: the network link is down.  Check that the network cable is connected correctly.

    A warning event occurred.  Event ID: 0xA004001B

    Generated time: 27/06/2014-17:05:06

    The event string: HP NC112T PCIe Gigabit Server Adapter

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 40000004

    Generated time: 27/06/2014-17:05:39

    The event string:

    The Kerberos client received a KRB_AP_ERR_MODIFIED error from the server of cadpdc1$. The target name was LDAP/cadpdc.engineer.com/*** Email address is removed from the privacy *. This indicates that the target server could not decrypt the ticket provided by the customer. This can occur when target server principal name (SPN) is registered on one different account that the target service uses. Ensure that the target THAT SPN is registered only on the account used by the server. This error can also occur if the password service target account is different from what is set up on the Kerberos key for this service target Distribution Center. Make sure that the service on the server and the KDC are configured to use the same password. If the server name is not complete, and the target domain (ENGINEER.COM) is different from the customer area (ENGINEER.COM), check if it is the same name of server accounts in these two areas, or use the fully qualified name to identify the server.

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 40000004

    Generated time: 27/06/2014-17:05:39

    The event string:

    The Kerberos client received a KRB_AP_ERR_MODIFIED error from the server of cadpdc1$. The target name was ldap/cadpdc.engineer.com/*** address email is removed from the privacy *. This indicates that the target server could not decrypt the ticket provided by the customer. This can occur when target server principal name (SPN) is registered on one different account that the target service uses. Ensure that the target THAT SPN is registered only on the account used by the server. This error can also occur if the password service target account is different from what is set up on the Kerberos key for this service target Distribution Center. Make sure that the service on the server and the KDC are configured to use the same password. If the server name is not complete, and the target domain (ENGINEER.COM) is different from the customer area (ENGINEER.COM), check if it is the same name of server accounts in these two areas, or use the fully qualified name to identify the server.

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 40000004

    Generated time: 27/06/2014-17:05:41

    The event string:

    The Kerberos client received a KRB_AP_ERR_MODIFIED error from the server of cadpdc1$. The target name was of cadpdc$. This indicates that the target server could not decrypt the ticket provided by the customer. This can occur when target server principal name (SPN) is registered on one different account that the target service uses. Ensure that the target THAT SPN is registered only on the account used by the server. This error can also occur if the password service target account is different from what is set up on the Kerberos key for this service target Distribution Center. Make sure that the service on the server and the KDC are configured to use the same password. If the server name is not complete, and the target domain (ENGINEER.COM) is different from the customer area (ENGINEER.COM), check if it is the same name of server accounts in these two areas, or use the fully qualified name to identify the server.

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 40000004

    Generated time: 27/06/2014-17:05:43

    The event string:

    The Kerberos client received a KRB_AP_ERR_MODIFIED error from the server of cadpdc1$. The target name used was GC/cadpdc.engineer.com/engineer.com. This indicates that the target server could not decrypt the ticket provided by the customer. This can occur when target server principal name (SPN) is registered on one different account that the target service uses. Ensure that the target THAT SPN is registered only on the account used by the server. This error can also occur if the password service target account is different from what is set up on the Kerberos key for this service target Distribution Center. Make sure that the service on the server and the KDC are configured to use the same password. If the server name is not complete, and the target domain (ENGINEER.COM) is different from the customer area (ENGINEER.COM), check if it is the same name of server accounts in these two areas, or use the fully qualified name to identify the server.

    A warning event occurred.  Event ID: 0x000727AA

    Generated time: 27/06/2014-17:05:43

    The event string:

    The WinRM service could not create the following SPNS: WSMAN/CADPDC1.engineer.com; WSMAN/CADPDC1.

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 40000004

    Generated time: 27/06/2014-17:05:55

    The event string:

    The Kerberos client received a KRB_AP_ERR_MODIFIED error from the server of cadpdc1$. The target name used was cifs/cadpdc.engineer.com. This indicates that the target server could not decrypt the ticket provided by the customer. This can occur when target server principal name (SPN) is registered on one different account that the target service uses. Ensure that the target THAT SPN is registered only on the account used by the server. This error can also occur if the password service target account is different from what is set up on the Kerberos key for this service target Distribution Center. Make sure that the service on the server and the KDC are configured to use the same password. If the server name is not complete, and the target domain (ENGINEER.COM) is different from the customer area (ENGINEER.COM), check if it is the same name of server accounts in these two areas, or use the fully qualified name to identify the server.

    A warning event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 84350444

    Generated time: 27/06/2014-17:05:58

    The event string:

    Information System Officer: health: Post errors have been detected.  One or more errors of Power-On-Self-Test were detected when the server starts.

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 40000004

    Generated time: 27/06/2014-17:05:59

    The event string:

    The Kerberos client received a KRB_AP_ERR_MODIFIED error from the server of cadpdc1$. The target name was E3514235-4B06-11D1-AB04-00C04FC2DCD2/5122bd13-c8ac-4265-a879-3a6831224994/*** Email address is removed from the privacy *. This indicates that the target server could not decrypt the ticket provided by the customer. This can occur when target server principal name (SPN) is registered on one different account that the target service uses. Ensure that the target THAT SPN is registered only on the account used by the server. This error can also occur if the password service target account is different from what is set up on the Kerberos key for this service target Distribution Center. Make sure that the service on the server and the KDC are configured to use the same password. If the server name is not complete, and the target domain (ENGINEER.COM) is different from the customer area (ENGINEER.COM), check if it is the same name of server accounts in these two areas, or use the fully qualified name to identify the server.

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 40000004

    Generated time: 27/06/2014-17:05:59

    The event string:

    The Kerberos client received a KRB_AP_ERR_MODIFIED error from the server of cadpdc1$. The target name used was ldap/cadpdc.engineer.com. This indicates that the target server could not decrypt the ticket provided by the customer. This can occur when target server principal name (SPN) is registered on one different account that the target service uses. Ensure that the target THAT SPN is registered only on the account used by the server. This error can also occur if the password service target account is different from what is set up on the Kerberos key for this service target Distribution Center. Make sure that the service on the server and the KDC are configured to use the same password. If the server name is not complete, and the target domain (ENGINEER.COM) is different from the customer area (ENGINEER.COM), check if it is the same name of server accounts in these two areas, or use the fully qualified name to identify the server.

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0x0000410B

    Generated time: 27/06/2014-17:05:59

    The event string:

    The request for a new account identifier pool failed. The operation will be retried until the request succeeds. The error is

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 40000004

    Generated time: 27/06/2014-17:06:07

    The event string:

    The Kerberos client received a KRB_AP_ERR_MODIFIED error from the server of cadpdc1$. The target name used was LDAP/cadpdc.engineer.com. This indicates that the target server could not decrypt the ticket provided by the customer. This can occur when target server principal name (SPN) is registered on one different account that the target service uses. Ensure that the target THAT SPN is registered only on the account used by the server. This error can also occur if the password service target account is different from what is set up on the Kerberos key for this service target Distribution Center. Make sure that the service on the server and the KDC are configured to use the same password. If the server name is not complete, and the target domain (ENGINEER.COM) is different from the customer area (ENGINEER.COM), check if it is the same name of server accounts in these two areas, or use the fully qualified name to identify the server.

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0x0000041F

    Generated time: 27/06/2014-17:06:30

    The event string:

    The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the computer name. This can be caused by one or more of the following:

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0x0000041D

    Generated time: 2014/06/27 17:07:07

    The event string:

    The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the user name. This can be caused by one or more of the following:

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0x0000041F

    Generated time: 2014/06/27 17:11:32

    The event string:

    The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the computer name. This can be caused by one or more of the following:

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0x0000041F

    Generated time: 27/06/2014-17:16:33

    The event string:

    The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the computer name. This can be caused by one or more of the following:

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 40000004

    Generated time: 27/06/2014-17:16:38

    The event string:

    The Kerberos client received a KRB_AP_ERR_MODIFIED error from the server of cadpdc1$. The target name used was LDAP/5122bd13-c8ac-4265-a879-3a6831224994._msdcs.engineer.com. This indicates that the target server could not decrypt the ticket provided by the customer. This can occur when target server principal name (SPN) is registered on one different account that the target service uses. Ensure that the target THAT SPN is registered only on the account used by the server. This error can also occur if the password service target account is different from what is set up on the Kerberos key for this service target Distribution Center. Make sure that the service on the server and the KDC are configured to use the same password. If the server name is not complete, and the target domain (ENGINEER.COM) is different from the customer area (ENGINEER.COM), check if it is the same name of server accounts in these two areas, or use the fully qualified name to identify the server.

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0x0000041F

    Generated time: 2014/06/27 17:21:35

    The event string:

    The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the computer name. This can be caused by one or more of the following:

    ......................... CADPDC1 failed test SystemLog

    Commencement of the trial: VerifyReferences

    ......................... CADPDC1 test VerifyReferences

    Running partition tests: ForestDnsZones

    Beginning of the test: CheckSDRefDom

    ......................... ForestDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom

    Beginning of the test: CrossRefValidation

    ......................... ForestDnsZones passed test

    CrossRefValidation

    Running partition tests: DomainDnsZones

    Beginning of the test: CheckSDRefDom

    ......................... DomainDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom

    Beginning of the test: CrossRefValidation

    ......................... DomainDnsZones passed test

    CrossRefValidation

    Running partition tests: schema

    Beginning of the test: CheckSDRefDom

    ......................... Schema passed test CheckSDRefDom

    Beginning of the test: CrossRefValidation

    ......................... Schema passed test CrossRefValidation

    Running partition tests: Configuration

    Beginning of the test: CheckSDRefDom

    ......................... Configuration test past CheckSDRefDom

    Beginning of the test: CrossRefValidation

    ......................... Configuration test past CrossRefValidation

    Running partition tests: engineer

    Beginning of the test: CheckSDRefDom

    ... engineer passed test CheckSDRefDom

    Beginning of the test: CrossRefValidation

    ... engineer passed test CrossRefValidation

    Running tests of the company: engineer.com

    Commencement of the trial: LocatorCheck

    ... engineer.com passed test LocatorCheck

    Commencement of the trial: cross-site

    ... engineer.com passed test intersite

    Hi Chamarasi,

    I suggest that you post the application on Microsoft TechNet forum because we have experts working on these issues. You can check the link to post the same query on TechNet:

    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home?category=WindowsServer

    Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have other questions related to Windows.

  • ACS 3.2 (2) Build 5 replication problem

    Hi all

    There are two ACS servers, sits inside an ASA 5510 at Headquarters and the other is inside an ASA 5510 on the hot site.

    These 5510 s ASA have been developed to replace two 515Es PIX and the claim is that since the ASAs went replication has stopped working. Of course, it makes no sense to me because there is communication between the ACS server and the firewall is down not anything whenever "replicate now" is issued.

    Unfortunately, I dunno much about ACS then is there something I can look for to help troubelshoot it ACS newspapers say

    WARNING cannot replicate to '4' Server - server does not

    That doesn't help us much, this is a way to get more detailed info journal which could indicate a problem? Thank you.

    Hello

    ACS uses the port TCP/2000 for replication. This port is also used by the skinny Protocol, making the port used by the ACS replication process.

    Fails replication of the ACS from the primary to the secondary, primary school reported that he cannot contact the secondary, and secondary shows any replication of the primary activity.

    A firewall between the two servers, ACS is configured to inspect the skinny Protocol, which uses the same port (TCP/2000) that the ACS replication process.

    If you do not have a call manager behind your firewall, please disable

    Skinny inspect if it is enabled.

    #Under overall policy, take the skinny inspection out of the inspection_default #class.

    don't inspect skinny

    You need to do this on both sides.

    HTH

    JK

    Please evaluate the useful messages-

  • TimesTen replication problem

    I'm currently implementing replication between two data stores timesten (11.2.1.8.0) created on two servers (asdbsl01poc and asdbsl02poc). Both servers have the same hardware and software configuration.

    TimesTen@asdbsl01poc/opt/TimesTen/linux/bin $. / ttVersion
    TimesTen release 11.2.1.8.0 (64-bit, Linux/x86_64) (linux:53388) 2011-02 - 02 T 02: 20:46Z
    Admin of the Forum: timesten
    Instance home directory: / opt/TimesTen/linux
    Group owner: timesten
    Demon base directory: / opt/TimesTen/linux/info
    PL/SQL active.
    TimesTen@asdbsl01poc/opt/TimesTen/linux/bin $

    TimesTen@asdbsl02poc/opt/TimesTen/linux/bin $. / ttVersion
    TimesTen release 11.2.1.8.0 (64-bit, Linux/x86_64) (linux:53388) 2011-02 - 02 T 02: 20:46Z
    Admin of the Forum: timesten
    Instance home directory: / opt/TimesTen/linux
    Group owner: timesten
    Demon base directory: / opt/TimesTen/linux/info
    PL/SQL active.
    TimesTen@asdbsl02poc/opt/TimesTen/linux/bin $

    The/etc/hosts on each of the systems have entries on the other. I created a replication system using the link according to [http://download.oracle.com/otn_hosted_doc/timesten/1121/aspair.html]:

    Command > repschemes

    Active replication system standby:

    Master store: TT20110620 on ASDBSL01POC
    Master store: TT20110625 on ASDBSL02POC


    Excluded arrays:
    None

    Excluded groups Cache:
    None

    Excluded sequences:
    None

    Store: TT20110620 on ASDBSL01POC
    Port: (self)
    Newspaper Fail threshold: (none)
    Retry timeout: 120 seconds
    Compress traffic: disabled

    Store: TT20110625 on ASDBSL02POC
    Port: (self)
    Newspaper Fail threshold: (none)
    Retry timeout: 120 seconds
    Compress traffic: disabled

    + 1 replication schema found. +
    Command >

    After you create the replication on asdbsl01poc (Master DB) system, I spent asdbsl02poc duplicate DB and follow this link [http://download.oracle.com/otn_hosted_doc/timesten/1121/aspair.html]:


    When I ran, ttRepAdmin-duplicate - tt20110620-asdbsl01poc - uid host *-pwd * - keepCG - cacheuid *-cacheuid * "DSN = tt20110625; UID =; PWD = "*, the link above to create a database of duplicate, I came across problems and got this error message:"

    TT12080: Any subscriber found to swap with
    TT12080: subscribed DSN: TT20110625; Host: ASDBSL02POC. FMR.COM. file: repSelf.c, line: 923

    Please let me know what the problem is. The pointers will be greatly appreciated!


    Thank you
    Vikram

    So that both copies (and indeed replciation) work corretcly, several criteria must be met:

    1 host names used in the names of data store in the REPLICAZTION CREATE or CREATE instructions ACTIVE standby must exactly match the names of local host returned by the command "hoistname".

    2. the host names must be able to be resolved on all the systems involved in the replication system.

    3. on each local system, the host name must be resolvable to an IP address that we can unequivocally identify an assigned to an interface on the local system.

    Most of the problems with double giving this error are because one or more of these criteria have not been met.

    My suspicion is that you used the Plains hostnames in your replication scheme, but the system host names are defined (wrongly) to include the domain name (i.e. the "hostname" command returns "asdbsl02poc.fmr.com" instead of just "asdbsl02poc". Best practice dictates that system hostnames does not include the domain information.

    Chris

  • ACS replication problem

    I have two ACS with replication configured. Manual replication works fine, but when setting up scheduled replication, server said "preliminary checks indicate a unnecessary outgoing replication - completed cycle. Even if the new features have been added to the main server, replication is irrelevant.

    Any thoughts?

    Please check this bug,

    CSCsd02854 : automatic replication has not triggered after changing the config

    components

    Symptom: When it is configured for automatic replication, only the changes to the users/groups/SPC are replicated automatically. Changes to the configuration of NAS, Admin, PAN, external databases

    components do not replication trigger.

    Conditions: This is seen when the automatic replication (intermittently or at a specific time) is configured.

    Solution: Start the replication manually after configuration changes for the affected

    components have been made.

    http://Tools.Cisco.com/support/BugToolKit/action.do?hdnAction=searchBugs

    Please make sure that the secondary ACS server, we have all the replicated network devices

    from the primary ACS server successfully. If they are not, and we have configured replication scheduled to take place, then we are hitting this bug.

    Kind regards

    ~ JG

    Note the useful messages

  • GoldenGate Bidirectional replication problem

    Hello

    I followed the below post for two-way replication with GoldenGate
    http://vishaldesai.WordPress.com/2011/02/24/Golden-Gate-bidirectional-replication-Oracle-to-Oracle-example/
    I am not able to do two-way.
    Although I have tested the two streams (from the source to the target and vice-verse) separately (they work well)

    my user to
    source side ggs
    ggs1 target side


    constraint unique error, certainly because of parameter TRANLOGOPTIONS EXCLUDEUSER
    but I mentioned this setting in my respective extracts.

    in the snippet next to the source, I used TRANLOGOPTIONS EXCLUDEUSER ggs1
    in the snippet next to the target, I used TRANLOGOPTIONS EXCLUDEUSER ggs

    is this correct. If yes then could you help me why my replicat is abending.


    Details of my scenario:

    source side1_

    extract
    extract soext119
    SetEnv (ORACLE_SID = GGDB)
    GGS ID USER, PASSWORD ggs12345
    RMTHOST localhost, mgrport 7810
    TRANLOGOPTIONS EXCLUDEUSER ggs1
    -GETAPPLOPS +.
    -IGNOREREPLICATES +.
    RMTTRAIL ./dirdat/rt
    -The DOF INCLUDE ALL THE +.
    TABLE ggs.stocksrc.

    replicat
    REPLICAT sorep119
    SetEnv (ORACLE_SID = GGDB)
    ASSUMETARGETDEFS
    GGS ID USER, PASSWORD ggs12345
    -The DOF INCLUDE ALL THE +.
    -HANDLECOLLISIONS +.
    CARD ggs1.stocksrc, ggs.stocksrc of the TARGET.

    face 2 source_

    replicat
    REPLICAT trep119
    SetEnv (ORACLE_SID = GGDB)
    ASSUMETARGETDEFS
    Ggs1 username, PASSWORD ggs12345
    -The DOF INCLUDE ALL THE +.
    CARD ggs.stocksrc, ggs1.stocksrc of the TARGET.

    extract
    EXTRACT text119
    SetEnv (ORACLE_SID = GGDB)
    Ggs1 username, PASSWORD ggs12345
    RMTHOST localhost, 7809 MGRPORT
    TRANLOGOPTIONS EXCLUDEUSER ggs
    -GETAPPLOPS +.
    -IGNOREREPLICATES +.
    RMTTRAIL ./dirdat/rs
    -The DOF INCLUDE ALL THE +.
    TABLE ggs1.stocksrc.




    Thank you
    Vikas

    Hello

    1. Why do you use user GG (ggs) at end of replication? Have you tried with another user?

    2. you must exclude the transaction user "ggs" in the source database and exclude ggs1 user transaction in the target database during extraction.

    If you use tables user gg for replication in bi directional certainly, you'll get the constraint violation error.

    Try the below test facility

    1. create the new user next to the source like CBC and create the stocksrc table in the schema of the CBC,

    2. create the new user in the target tgt database and create the stocksrc of the table under schema tgt.

    3 use user ggs for gg admin only in the source also ggs1 for target gg admin and exclude the user transaction gg on the two parameters of the extract.

    side source extracted:

    extract
    extract soext119
    SetEnv (ORACLE_SID = GGDB)
    GGS ID USER, PASSWORD ggs12345
    RMTHOST localhost, mgrport 7810
    TRANLOGOPTIONS EXCLUDEUSER ggs
    -GETAPPLOPS
    -IGNOREREPLICATES
    RMTTRAIL ./dirdat/rt
    -The DOF INCLUDE ALL
    TABLE src.stocksrc.

    replicat
    REPLICAT sorep119
    SetEnv (ORACLE_SID = GGDB)
    ASSUMETARGETDEFS
    GGS ID USER, PASSWORD ggs12345
    -The DOF INCLUDE ALL
    -HANDLECOLLISIONS
    CARD tgt.stocksrc, src.stocksrc of the TARGET.

    Side of the target:

    replicat
    REPLICAT trep119
    SetEnv (ORACLE_SID = GGDB)
    ASSUMETARGETDEFS
    Ggs1 username, PASSWORD ggs12345
    -The DOF INCLUDE ALL
    CARD src.stocksrc, tgt.stocksrc of the TARGET.

    extract
    EXTRACT text119
    SetEnv (ORACLE_SID = GGDB)
    Ggs1 username, PASSWORD ggs12345
    RMTHOST localhost, 7809 MGRPORT
    TRANLOGOPTIONS EXCLUDEUSER ggs1
    -GETAPPLOPS
    -IGNOREREPLICATES
    RMTTRAIL ./dirdat/rs
    -The DOF INCLUDE ALL
    TABLE tgt.stocksrc.

    HTH

  • Replication problem

    Hello

    I have a very weird and one urgent problem.

    (My Source database is 10gR2(10.2.0.3/RedHat4) and my target database is 11gR2(11.2.0.3/RedHat4)

    Database of source:* _

    extract E_DPRD
    Ogg@OSIRIS1 username, password xxx
    exttrail/oracle/product/goldengate/data/PD
    PURGEOLDEXTRACTS
    DBOPTIONS ALLOWUNUSEDCOLUMN
    TRANLOGOPTIONS ASMUSER sys@ASM_OSIRIS, ASMPASSWORD xxxx
    dynamic wildcardresolve
    TABLE OSIRIS.*;
    OSIRIS TABLEEXCLUDE. TOAD_PLAN_TABLE

    extract P_DPRD
    PassThru
    rmthost 10.206.30.129, mgrport 7840
    rmttrail/app/oracle/product/goldengate/data/PD
    table OSIRIS.*;

    Target databases:+ _

    extract P_DPRD
    PassThru
    rmthost 10.206.30.xxx, mgrport 7840
    rmttrail/app/oracle/product/goldengate/data/PD
    table OSIRIS.*;

    All processes are runing and it seems that the 2 databases are synchronized, but the problem is for 4 tables GG replicate all columns! It replicates just the PK and some columns...

    Kind regards

    Published by: vittel on June 7, 2012 16:53

    Published by: vittel on June 7, 2012 16:54

    Keep TABLEEXCLUDE OSIRIS. TOAD_PLAN_TABLE on top of TABLE OSIRIS.* in params.

    If you have enabled trandata now, there will be inconsistency of data on the target database.you need to go to the initial charge once more.

  • Windows Server 2012R2 replication errors

    Hi, just work through exams 2012R2 if it is in a lab environment, but would like some help on this one that I had trouble finding a solution on this one.

    Just to give you a little history, until recently, I had a single DC 2012R2 environment on my lab. About 6 months ago I had to follow the nets below to retrieve my DC after what can't that assume was an unclean shutdown of my host.

    http://blog.Shiraj.com/2014/10/how-to-fix-c00002e2-directory-services-could-not-start-blue-screen/

    https://support.Microsoft.com/en-us/KB/2751452

    I'm working through scenarios without problem until recently.

    I added a 2nd DC to the existing successful domain although while they inspected the State of replication I seem to come through a few questions in relation to the folder sysvol replica don't properly on the additional domain controller.

    The folder and subfolders are but empty during the 2nd DC.

    I run DCDiag on the original domain controller today, the majority of the tests pass ok (some have failed, but I transfer the roles, closing the vms on and outside, as I used it, but the below was obvious as I promoted the 2nd DC):

    There are warning or error events in the last 24 hours after the
    SYSVOL is shared.  Don't not SYSVOL replication problems can cause
    The Group of political problems. (from DCDIAG)

    I ran the monitor of the replication on the original domain controller health and get the 2 outputs following.

    1. the DFS replication service failed to recover from an internal database error on the C: volume. Replication stopped for all folders replicated on this volume until the database is automatically rebuilt. If the database is rebuilt successfully, replication will resume once the reconstruction is complete. If the database cannot be rebuilt, a separate event is generated. If you see this error more than twice in seven days, we recommend that you run Chkdsk on the volume that contains the database. Event ID: 2104

    2. the service stopped DFS replication on the C: volume replication. This failure can occur because the disk is full, the disc is a failure or a quota limit has been reached. Event ID: 2004

    I followed the discussions to try and resolve this problem without a bit of luck, I can also confirm that the disk is not full or failed.

    On the 2nd DC health is:

    This member is waiting for initial replication for replicated folder SYSVOL share and does not currently participate in replication. This delay can occur because the Member is waiting for the replication service DFS retrieve the settings from Active Directory Domain Services replication. After the Member detects that it is part of the replication group, the Member will start the initial replication.

    Where papers on the original domain controller I was also picking up the following event logs:

    Log name: Application
    Source: ESENT
    Date: 16/04/2016 13:51:57
    Event ID: 516
    Task category: registration/recovery
    Level: error
    Keywords: Classic
    User: n/a
    Computer: server.domain

    Description:
    \\.\C:\System Volume Information\DFSR\database_6A02_9B3F_29B_F67\dfsr.db SRBHT (1388): database \\.\C:\System Volume Information\DFSR\database_6A02_9B3F_29B_F67\dfsr.db: Page 46 (0x0000002e) due to a timestamp mismatch verification failure.  The timestamp "before" persisted in the paper of record was 0x10fbb, but the current timestamp on page 0 x 11004.  The update 'after' timestamp 0 11017 x which would have updated the time stamp on the page.  Recovery/restore will fail with the error-567.  If this condition persists then please restore it from a previous backup. This problem is probably due to a defective material 'lose' one or more colors on this page in the past. For further assistance diagnosing the problem, contact your hardware vendor.
    The event XML:

     
       
        516
        2
        3
        0 x 80000000000000
       
        7033
        Application
        Server
       
     

     
        SRBHT
        1388
        \\.\C:\System volume Information\DFSR\database_6A02_9B3F_29B_F67\dfsr.db:

        \\.\C:\System volume Information\DFSR\database_6A02_9B3F_29B_F67\dfsr.db
        46 (0x0000002e)
        0x10fbb
        0 x 11004
        -567
        0 x 11017
     

    Log name: Application
    Source: ESENT
    Date: 16/04/2016 13:51:57
    Event ID: 454
    Task category: registration/recovery
    Level: error
    Keywords: Classic
    User: n/a
    Computer: server.domain
    Description:
    \\.\C:\System Volume Information\DFSR\database_6A02_9B3F_29B_F67\dfsr.db SRBHT (1388): database recovery/restore failed with the error unexpected-567.
    The event XML:

     
       
        454
        2
        3
        0 x 80000000000000
       
        7034
        Application
        Server
       
     

     
        SRBHT
        1388
        \\.\C:\System volume Information\DFSR\database_6A02_9B3F_29B_F67\dfsr.db:
        -567
     

    I think that these are related to my original question, but any advice would be appreciated.

    Thank you

    Please post your query to:

    https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/

    Server issues are better addressed there.

  • Replication of VSphere marked as non-active

    Dear all,

    I configured the SRM connection between two sites. I have them paired with success and set up the connection to VR.

    Problem is when I put a replication for certain one VM, once the wizard is finished, vsphere replication monitor displays status - not Active. The events and tasks of the VM, I found the following warning:

    No connection to the server of VR: do not answer

    I am able to ping/telnet port 80 two of these machines of this virtual machine replication.

    Could you please help me solve this problem.

    Thank you

    Aleksandar Aleksandrov

    Hi again,

    OK, here's the problem.

    Basically when pair you it with DR site both VR servers are to exchange information between them for example VRS server target. So in this case you end up with the following situation:

    (1) VRS on the DR site has different IP address than the Production site

    (2) production site ESXi tries to connect to VRS IP at the Dr site not directly through your port transfer machine

    (3) what makes the replication to go to idle state

    Please check the messages in the vmkernel.log file located in your source ESXi machine. Here's a useful KB KB VMware: VMware vSphere troubleshooting replication problems that might be useful.

    Thank you

    Dzhem

  • Questions about replication configuration

    Hello

    We currently have the configuration of the following replication to a backup Timesten hot facility:

    CREATE REPLICATION REP1
    A store of DATA of ELEMENT
    MASTERS ds on "host1".
    SUBSCRIBED ds on "host2".
    RETURN TWOSAFE
    ELEMENT b DATASTORE
    MASTERS ds on "host2".
    SUBSCRIBED ds on "host1".
    RETURN TWOSAFE
    STORE ftappttprd on "host1" PREMISES COMMETTRE ACTION COMMETTRE
    RETURN SERVICES OFF WHEN REPLICATION STOPPED
    SUSTAINABLE COMMITMENT ON
    RESUME BACK 300
    Ftappttprd on "host2" LOCAL STORE COMMIT ACTION COMMITTING
    RETURN SERVICES OFF WHEN REPLICATION STOPPED
    SUSTAINABLE COMMITMENT ON
    CVS BACK 300;

    1)
    (a) only the part of the sentence 'COMMIT LOCAL ACTION VALIDATION' implies whenever replication fails on the Subscriber, so the update will be hired locally on master? that is, it is actually becomes a commit sustainable.
    (b) only apply to the timeout for replication scenario? What about other cases where commit at the Subscriber cannot be done.
    (2) if we do not have the expression of DISABLE RETURN as above, would be 'SUSTAINABLE ON COMMETTRE' and 'SUMMARY BACK' always to news?
    in other words, if we decide to stop the replication agent after failover mode standby
    -service back end
    -txn on master will commit sustainable
    -the return service will resume automatically when the replication agent is started again (after the replication problem is fixed)

    Thank you

    Mike

    Here are the answers:

    1)
    (a) only the part of the sentence 'COMMIT LOCAL ACTION VALIDATION' implies whenever replication fails on the Subscriber, so the update will be hired locally on master? that is, it is actually becomes a commit sustainable.

    CJ > if there is a timeout of servcie to return for a transaction twosafe the default behavior is that the transaction state remains "pending" and the appl; ication must include logic to keep retrying the validation until it succeeds or the application decides to abandon. By configuring LOCAL ACTION COMMIT ENTER, when a timeout occurs the transaction committed locally the band except manipulation (or ignore) the return servcie timeout warningf application has no need to make special anythnin.

    (b) only apply to the timeout for replication scenario? What about other cases where commit at the Subscriber cannot be done.

    CJ > it applies to delays. If you get a different kind of validation error then the application must decide what to (force a local commit or rollback).

    (2) if we do not have the expression of DISABLE RETURN as above, would be 'SUSTAINABLE ON COMMETTRE' and 'SUMMARY BACK' always to news?

    CJ > COMMETTRE SUSTAINABLE can be valid deoending on other factors, RETIURN RESUME is not valid (or useful)

    in other words, if we decide to stop the replication agent after failover mode standby
    -service back end
    -txn on master will commit sustainable
    -the return service will resume automatically when the replication agent is started again (after the replication problem is fixed)

    CJ > I guess you mean "failure" of the day before. Yes, with this configuration, you should see the behavior that yopu described above. The curriculum VITAE of RETURN should not be necessary.

  • Toshiba Satellite L50-B-1DJ does not supply power to the top after removing the HARD drive

    Hello world!

    I have a Toshiba Satellite L50-B-1DJ. It has a 750 GB HARD drive, but it wasn't enough for me. So I bought a Toshiba 1 TB HARD drive. I have undone all the screws, carefully (using my driver's license), lifted up the plastic and removed a HARD disk.

    BTW, I really like this plastic solution on the HARD drive!

    Then I realized, that all my stuff is still on it.
    So I put the HARD drive, I'm going to copy everything on my drive hard Ext. planning.
    Well I screwed it back, got the battery, put the back of the AC adapter.

    Battery charge light was on, indicating that the current flows. I pressed the 'Start' button, and nothing happened. He broke yet still nothing. I plugged the battery and the AC output adapter, I held the Power button for 30 seconds, put everything back still nothing. I got scared. Opened back once more, just to take a look at, so anything that slipped on. Nope.

    Everything is a okay. What should do? I have the warranty? I hope not.
    Can I fix myself without void my warranty? I hope so!

    And also: I bought the laptop in Hungary, but I'm in Germany. Can I fix here in case my warranty is valid?

    Thank you very much for your help!

    Sincerely,
    Bertold Juhasz

    PS: As you say that English is not my native language, please don't flip out on my grammar I know it's wrong

    I just took the hard drive out of mine and put it back to see if I could reproduce your problem after trying several times I had no problem.
    Have you checked the pins at the end of the hard drive to see if all are damaged, another that I can't imagine what else.

    ICH habe just die Fliegengitter aus von mir gemacht und wieder, um zu sehen, ob ich das problem nach dem Versuch're mehrmals I had keine zu make a replication problem.
    Haben Sie die pins am Ende der Tiger uberpruft, um zu sehen, wenn eine beschadigt sind, dass ich nicht, except a great denken nichts.

  • Keywords in Photos: I'm the only one?

    I am a heavy user of Photos with 20 000 (non-professional) pictures in my library. I spent hundreds of hours of editing, new date and keywording photos pictures (and iPhotos before that). I had a very rough transition from iPhotos to Photos, lost randomly some images, lost random meta data. I am running the latest version of iOS and were at the Apple store dozens of times trying to address any inconsistencies in my photo library. They tried everything short of the nuclear option of pictures of wiping and re - install new, no back-up, which is probably damaged. This option is not possible for me given I would lose all the work that I gave to this labor of love. At this point, I just hope that someone smarter Apple will address these glitches, so I can save my sanity.

    I'm struggling with the loss of functionality in the Photos that I wait patiently for features to be restored (securities transfer of lots, bulk as of a date change, etc.) In the meantime, keywords are sent adjustments. Keywords that I delete do not disappear and appear in searches. I have four key words called '4 star' who all have different pictures in them. I sometimes manually put the different lots '4 stars' key words a single keyword '4 star', but a new keyword is often re-creation. In other words, it's a manual solution sometimes, but only temporary. According to the issue of not really deleting keywords, keywords because duplicate like tribbles makes the problem even worse. I have at least half a dozen keywords in double at some point. Replication problem of keyword seems to be more common with the keywords 'stars' who were previously only stars, but there are many other duplicate keywords.

    My question is: does anyone else have these questions, and if so, did you understand any workaround? I am beyond frustrated. I went full-Apple and full-pictures for this project, and can't give up now. Other chronic problems with Photos?

    P.S. I have also submitted comments from the Apple but don't hold my breath.

    Can you please tell us something about the origin of your photo library?  All my problems with keywords in the Photos had their problem in Aperture and my photo stream.

    Your photo library a new library, was born in pictures, with new photos that have never been in another library, or did you migrate your library somewhere.

    If your library consists only of new photos, and all the keywords have been affected in the Photos, it should help to use the keywords and click on "Edit keywords".  You can use the edit mode to remove all unused keywords.

    But if your library has been migrated from a different library (iPhoto, Aperture) and allowed you to open write the key words in the original images, you're stuck with old advertising keywords, misspellings in them. Photos cannot remove key words written to the original captain of the files.

    I used exiftool from the Terminal to remove all the original files of the masters key words and started in Photos.

    To install exiftool: http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/%7Ephil/exiftool/install.html

  • There is no such thing as Netlogon share

    Hi all

    I have problems with SBS 2008. I am a consultant and the company has a computer scientist. I don't get all the answers I need, but for now, I am all that and that person is not allowed on the servers.

    I get the error 'Failed to connect in the NETLOGON share!' when you run DCDIAG. I followed the discussions here and completing restore of sysvol. There place in the SYSVOL directory while now I SYSVOL\SYSVOL C:\Windows. Replication seeme to work. When I performed the restoration of authorittive got event 13516 newspaper FRS indicating that AD is no longer prevents this computer from becoming a domain controller. Here are the results of the DCDIAG. Thanks for any help on this.

    Directory Server diagnosis

    Perform the initial configuration:

    Trying to find the server at home...

    Home Server = HHTSBS

    * Identified AD forest.
    Made the initial collection of information.

    Make the required initial tests

    Test server: Default-First-Site-Name\HHTSBS

    Commencement of the trial: connectivity

    ......................... HHTSBS passed test connectivity

    Primary testing

    Test server: Default-First-Site-Name\HHTSBS

    Commencement of the trial: advertising

    ......................... HHTSBS passed test advertising

    Beginning of the test: FrsEvent

    He cautioned there or error in the last 24 hours events after that share SYSVOL has been shared.  Fault of SYSVOL

    replication problems may cause group policy issues.
    ......................... HHTSBS test FrsEvent

    Commencement of the trial: DFSREvent

    ......................... Test HHTSBS DFSREvent

    Commencement of the trial: SysVolCheck

    ......................... Test HHTSBS SysVolCheck

    Beginning of the test: KccEvent

    ......................... HHTSBS test KccEvent

    Beginning of the test: KnowsOfRoleHolders

    ......................... HHTSBS test KnowsOfRoleHolders

    Beginning of the test: MachineAccount

    ......................... HHTSBS test MachineAccount

    Beginning of the test: NCSecDesc

    ......................... HHTSBS passed test NCSecDesc

    Beginning of the test: NetLogons

    Cannot connect in the NETLOGON share. (\\HHTSBS\netlogon)

    [HHTSBS] An net use or LsaPolicy operation failed with error 67, the network name cannot be found...

    ......................... HHTSBS failed test NetLogons

    Commencement of the trial: ObjectsReplicated

    ......................... Test HHTSBS ObjectsReplicated

    From test: Replications

    ......................... Test HHTSBS past replications

    Beginning of the test: RidManager

    ......................... HHTSBS passed test RidManager

    Commencement of the trial: Services

    ......................... HHTSBS test passed Services

    Beginning of the test: SystemLog

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 00000422

    Generated time: 12:28:30 27/02/2016

    The event string:

    The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows tried to read the file \\hht.local\SysVol\hht.local\Policies\{E9232823-50CC-41E7-BED9-F19F54AA608F}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and has failed. Group Policy settings cannot be applied until this event is resolved. This problem may be transient and can be caused by one or more of the following:

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0xC0001B77

    Generated time: 27/02/2016-12:29:26

    The event string:

    The Microsoft Exchange Transport service ended unexpectedly.  It has done this 1 time.  The following corrective action will be performed in 5000 milliseconds: restart the service.

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 00000422

    Generated time: 27/02/2016-12:33:33

    The event string:

    The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows tried to read the file \\hht.local\SysVol\hht.local\Policies\{E9232823-50CC-41E7-BED9-F19F54AA608F}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and has failed. Group Policy settings cannot be applied until this event is resolved. This problem may be transient and can be caused by one or more of the following:

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0xC0001B77

    Generated time: 12:34:32 27/02/2016

    The event string:

    The Microsoft Exchange Transport service ended unexpectedly.  It has done this 1 time.  The following corrective action will be performed in 5000 milliseconds: restart the service.

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 40000004

    Generated time: 27/02/2016-12:36:55

    The event string:

    The Kerberos client received a KRB_AP_ERR_MODIFIED error from the server iis-webserver-$1. The target name used was cifs/hhtweb.hht.local. This indicates that the target server could not decrypt the ticket provided by the customer. This can occur when target server principal name (SPN) is registered on one different account that the target service uses. Please ensure that the objective of SPN is registered and only registered on, the account used by the server. This error can also occur when the target service uses a different for the target service account password for that target that the Distribution Center of the keys Kerberos (KDC) has for the service account. Please ensure that the service on the server and the KDC are both set to update to use the current password. If the server name is not complete and the target domain (VRD. LOCAL) is different from the customer area (VRD. (LOCAL), check if it is the same name of server accounts in these two areas, or use the fully qualified name to identify the server.

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 00000422

    Generated time: 12:38:37 27/02/2016

    The event string:

    The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows tried to read the file \\hht.local\SysVol\hht.local\Policies\{E9232823-50CC-41E7-BED9-F19F54AA608F}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and has failed. Group Policy settings cannot be applied until this event is resolved. This problem may be transient and can be caused by one or more of the following:

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0xC0001B77

    Generated time: 27/02/2016-12:39:37

    The event string:

    The Microsoft Exchange Transport service ended unexpectedly.  It has done this 1 time.  The following corrective action will be performed in 5000 milliseconds: restart the service.

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 00000422

    Generated time: 27/02/2016-12:43:40

    The event string:

    The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows tried to read the file \\hht.local\SysVol\hht.local\Policies\{E9232823-50CC-41E7-BED9-F19F54AA608F}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and has failed. Group Policy settings cannot be applied until this event is resolved. This problem may be transient and can be caused by one or more of the following:

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0xC0001B77

    Generated time: 12:44:42 27/02/2016

    The event string:

    The Microsoft Exchange Transport service ended unexpectedly.  It has done this 1 time.  The following corrective action will be performed in 5000 milliseconds: restart the service.

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 00000422

    Generated time: 12:48:42 27/02/2016

    The event string:

    The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows tried to read the file \\hht.local\SysVol\hht.local\Policies\{E9232823-50CC-41E7-BED9-F19F54AA608F}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and has failed. Group Policy settings cannot be applied until this event is resolved. This problem may be transient and can be caused by one or more of the following:

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0xC0001B77

    Generated time: 27/02/2016-12:49:48

    The event string:

    The Microsoft Exchange Transport service ended unexpectedly.  It has done this 1 time.  The following corrective action will be performed in 5000 milliseconds: restart the service.

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 00000422

    Generated time: 27/02/2016-12:53:45

    The event string:

    The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows tried to read the file \\hht.local\SysVol\hht.local\Policies\{E9232823-50CC-41E7-BED9-F19F54AA608F}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and has failed. Group Policy settings cannot be applied until this event is resolved. This problem may be transient and can be caused by one or more of the following:

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0xC0001B77

    Generated time: 27/02/2016-12:54:53

    The event string:

    The Microsoft Exchange Transport service ended unexpectedly.  It has done this 1 time.  The following corrective action will be performed in 5000 milliseconds: restart the service.

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 00000422

    Generated time: 27/02/2016-12:58:48

    The event string:

    The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows tried to read the file \\hht.local\SysVol\hht.local\Policies\{E9232823-50CC-41E7-BED9-F19F54AA608F}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and has failed. Group Policy settings cannot be applied until this event is resolved. This problem may be transient and can be caused by one or more of the following:

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0xC0001B77

    Generated time: 27/02/2016-12:59:58

    The event string:

    The Microsoft Exchange Transport service ended unexpectedly.  It has done this 1 time.  The following corrective action will be performed in 5000 milliseconds: restart the service.

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 00000422

    Generated time: 27/02/2016 13:03:51

    The event string:

    The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows tried to read the file \\hht.local\SysVol\hht.local\Policies\{E9232823-50CC-41E7-BED9-F19F54AA608F}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and has failed. Group Policy settings cannot be applied until this event is resolved. This problem may be transient and can be caused by one or more of the following:

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0xC0001B77

    Generated time: 27/02/2016 13:05:04

    The event string:

    The Microsoft Exchange Transport service ended unexpectedly.  It has done this 1 time.  The following corrective action will be performed in 5000 milliseconds: restart the service.

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 00000422

    Generated time: 27/02/2016 13:08:54

    The event string:

    The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows tried to read the file \\hht.local\SysVol\hht.local\Policies\{E9232823-50CC-41E7-BED9-F19F54AA608F}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and has failed. Group Policy settings cannot be applied until this event is resolved. This problem may be transient and can be caused by one or more of the following:

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0xC0001B77

    Generated time: 27/02/2016 13:10:09

    The event string:

    The Microsoft Exchange Transport service ended unexpectedly.  It has done this 1 time.  The following corrective action will be performed in 5000 milliseconds: restart the service.

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 00000422

    Generated time: 27/02/2016 13:13:57

    The event string:

    The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows tried to read the file \\hht.local\SysVol\hht.local\Policies\{E9232823-50CC-41E7-BED9-F19F54AA608F}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and has failed. Group Policy settings cannot be applied until this event is resolved. This problem may be transient and can be caused by one or more of the following:

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0xC0001B77

    Generated time: 27/02/2016 13:15:14

    The event string:

    The Microsoft Exchange Transport service ended unexpectedly.  It has done this 1 time.  The following corrective action will be performed in 5000 milliseconds: restart the service.

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 00000422

    Generated time: 27/02/2016 13:19

    The event string:

    The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows tried to read the file \\hht.local\SysVol\hht.local\Policies\{E9232823-50CC-41E7-BED9-F19F54AA608F}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and has failed. Group Policy settings cannot be applied until this event is resolved. This problem may be transient and can be caused by one or more of the following:

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0xC0001B77

    Generated time: 27/02/2016 13:20:20

    The event string:

    The Microsoft Exchange Transport service ended unexpectedly.  It has done this 1 time.  The following corrective action will be performed in 5000 milliseconds: restart the service.

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0 x 00000422

    Generated time: 27/02/2016 13:24:03

    The event string:

    The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows tried to read the file \\hht.local\SysVol\hht.local\Policies\{E9232823-50CC-41E7-BED9-F19F54AA608F}\gpt.ini from a domain controller and has failed. Group Policy settings cannot be applied until this event is resolved. This problem may be transient and can be caused by one or more of the following:

    An error event occurred.  Event ID: 0xC0001B77

    Generated time: 27/02/2016 13:25:25

    The event string:

    The Microsoft Exchange Transport service ended unexpectedly.  It has done this 1 time.  The following corrective action will be performed in 5000 milliseconds: restart the service.

    ......................... HHTSBS failed test SystemLog

    Commencement of the trial: VerifyReferences

    ......................... Test HHTSBS VerifyReferences

    Running partition tests: ForestDnsZones

    Beginning of the test: CheckSDRefDom

    ......................... ForestDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom

    Beginning of the test: CrossRefValidation

    ......................... ForestDnsZones passed test CrossRefValidation

    Running partition tests: DomainDnsZones

    Beginning of the test: CheckSDRefDom

    ......................... DomainDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom

    Beginning of the test: CrossRefValidation

    ......................... DomainDnsZones passed test CrossRefValidation

    Running partition tests: schema

    Beginning of the test: CheckSDRefDom

    ......................... Schema passed test CheckSDRefDom

    Beginning of the test: CrossRefValidation

    ......................... Schema passed test CrossRefValidation

    Running partition tests: Configuration

    Beginning of the test: CheckSDRefDom

    ......................... Configuration test past CheckSDRefDom

    Beginning of the test: CrossRefValidation

    ......................... Configuration test past CrossRefValidation

    Running partition tests: HHT

    Beginning of the test: CheckSDRefDom

    ... VRD test CheckSDRefDom

    Beginning of the test: CrossRefValidation

    ... VRD test CrossRefValidation

    Running tests from the company: hht.local

    Commencement of the trial: LocatorCheck

    ... hht.local passed test LocatorCheck

    Commencement of the trial: cross-site

    ... hht.local passed test intersite

    Hello

    Your Question is beyond the scope of this community.

    I suggest that repost you your question in the Forums of SBS.

    https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home?Forum=smallbusinessserver

    "Windows Small Business Server 2011 Essentials online help"

    https://msdn.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/home-client.aspx

    See you soon.

  • HIT / ME for Dell EQL - this will improve line performance and capacity

    Hello

    I'm new to Dell EQL. Got a server running VMware ESXi 5.1 U1 executes a single virtual machine with Windows 2008 R2 and MS SQL 2008 R2.

    Tried the replication between the size of the replica EQLs has reached 500 MB to 1 GB despite the growth of the database per day is around 50 MB only.

    I read about a white paper, which suggests to use the direct storage. In short I will introduce a volume of the virtual machine directly via the Windows iSCSI initiator.

    In fact, I did already saw minimal improvement.

    Will install HIT / solve ME my problem of replication?

    What KEY / to ME in order to protect MS SQL?

    He is able to save only the changes to the SQL database and not these useless bits that are my replication problem...

    Thank you

    Paul

    Hello

    No. HIT / ME and VSM allow the creation of snapshots and much more consistent replicas.  Since the cached are flushed to storage before the process of creation.  HIT / VSM and I do very differentlly under the covers, but the end result is the same.

    HIT / the advantage ME in addition to work directly with SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint.  The HIT / ME docs have more information on the benefits of the use of HIT / me.

    Nor will affect the size of the replication. EQL table is a block storage device. The blocks are organized in large pages.  When you edit a page, the entire page is allocated.

  • Any flash player prevents the judgment of Win 7.

    The flash drive is accessible and will download & upload files. If 'Remove hardware safely' is executed, there is no answer that it is now safe to remove. So if you try to shut down the computer, it crashes to the screen "shutting down". So, I have to force a shutdown by pressing the power button.

    I tried to update the drivers for the USB ports and flashdrives without change. I ran toubleshooting without help. The flashderives work well in another computer on Windows 7. I also inserted the flash drive before you start up with the same results. I removed the flash drive before stopping with no difference.

    The computer is a desktop HP with AMD athlon dual core clocked Win 7 Home premium sp1.

    Joe S

    You update the chipset and drivers HP usb or windows update?

    Y at - it an update of the Bios from HP?

    If you clean boot the PC is the replication problem?

    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/331796 NB is the manual method not the FixIt

Maybe you are looking for