VPN 3030 load balancing

Similar Questions

• ASA Vpn load balancing and failover

  Hi all.

  We have two asa5520 configured as main unit and emergency in failover configuration, and everything works fine.

  Is it possible with this configuration (switch), configure the vpn load balancing/grouping?

  Thank you

  Daniele

  Hi Daniele,

  You cannot run two of them on two firewalls ASA, VPN feature load balancing or failover functionality.

  Where you need to use the two feature, you must use more than three ASA firewall, two first ASAs will work as the failover and the ASA third will work as cluster VPN for them, the following example uses four firewalls:

  ASA1 (active FO) - ASA2 (TF Standby)

  (VPN virtual master)

  |

  |

  |

  |

  (Backup VPN device)

  ASA3 (active FO) - ASA4 (TF Standby)

  Kind regards

  Wajih

• VPN 3030 - balancing problem

  Hi all

  I had set up on VPN 3030 of load balancing. On it, he had a few problems. Firstly, 3030 high school has more RAM (512) that the primary (128). The secondary was purchased just a month back with 512 M RAM and latest OS 4.1.7.

  (1) land of redirected to the secondary hub, after active LB normal VPN clients. There are more than 10-15 connections that landed on the secondary and none landed on the primary. I understand that this is because the captain now less connections... is that good? But why is there not all connections on the master?

  (2) web VPN didn't work that well with load balancing enabled. HTTPS protocol and the virtual IP address does not work. When tried with the physical separately IPs, it works, but not with the virtual IP address. port 443 opens not with the virtual IP address. Why is this? can I configure something else for this?

  I also noticed that once you activate load balancing, redirection is done directly on physical IP addresses, which means that end users will know the physical IP addresses and connect directly if they need. Why is this? can someone shed light on this?

  REDA

  To answer one of your questions, I think that primary will have connections only when the secondary a number of minimum connections...

• VPN on several ISP load balancing

  Hi all

  Please explaing on VPN load balancing based on a scenario where two Internet service providers are here. How can I configure vpn balance in such a scenario?

  Thank you

  Shijo.

  Hi Shijo

  What type of VPN connections you want to balance the load? VPN remote access right? You can essentially set up a cluster within your VPN to load device balanced local traffic, passing through the same ISP... but for a scenario with 2 different ISPS, this may seem a bit difficult... Just because of the fact that your vpn device will have two different IPs on the outer side and have to finish on two different interfaces... tracking and grouping two interfaces are difficult..., your VPN clients will point to a single IP address on the part of ISPS, and virtual IPs have in this case is difficult...

  Hope this helps... good luck...

  REDA

• VPN load balancing

  Hello

  for Concentrators VPN load-balancing, a similar configuration must be to both devices. The master of the cluster config VPN concentrator push. for other members of the cluster, or must be manually?

  Thanks in advance

  Hi Abu Alqader,

  The decision to use load balancing or VRRP is a lot depends on your VPN environment.

  Personally, I think that load balancing is good/ideal if you have a lot of clients VPN, for example > 500 users. With 2 VPN3K of load balancing, you can share VPN connectivity between the boxes and will not weigh 1 VPN unit at any time. Also, if one of these boxes is down, affected vpn clients can still connect to the other device. But you must configure the VPN backup server in all the software VPN Client to achieve configuration.

  VRRP, however, has its own advantages. If the primary VPN device, all VPN Clients can still connect to a 1 modem router VPN, VRRP, allowing practically to the backup device to inherit/use primary/active VPN public IP (as the gateway). With regard to non max users, VRRP probably appropriate for the low-end model like 3005 (IPsec-200/50 clientless) & 3015 (IPSec 100/75 without client).

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2284/products_data_sheet09186a00801d3b56.html

  However, the final decision depends on what option you feel better suite your environment. There is no right or wrong.

  Pls rate if find you this post will help you.

  Rgds,

  AK

• Limitation of the load balancing VPN3000

  Dear all,

  How many devices can be configured for balancing the load of solutions?

  What is the upper limit?

  Can I assume that if configure US 2 devices, the throughput will be be200 MB, flow of four aircraft is 400 MB, etc.?

  Any thoughts?

  Best regards

  Engel

  No, no, the traffic is not load balanced between all hubs in the group, that the connections are. For example, when you connect with a VPN client address bundle, concentrators determine what hub is lightly loaded, your connection is then completed and supplemented by this hub. All traffic goes between your client and the hub only, like any normal connection. There is no increase in bandwidth to this connection.

  In regard to the number of devices you use, we have tested successfully with 8, but there is no theoretical limit.

• RV042 load balancing problem

  We have two network connections coming into the office. One is a private Wan, and the other is a WAN on the internet. We have a RV042 router configured for load balancing. We have our private WAN which includes Exchange and 6 VPN Wan1. On WAN2, we have a public IP address and home workers. Both connections are 5 Mg T1s and both have the ability to access the internet but only wan2 has a public IP (76.x.x.x) were as WAN1 has a private IP address. (10.x.x.x).

  Were now the problem lies is our new website based on payroll, system does not support load balancing. We have on one hand stop when we do pay (Tower load balancing off.)

  Now is it possible to use our computers to pay only one side? change the host file maybe? Or force a certain MAC address of use only the WAN1 or is there a better router to achieve?

  Any help would be appreciated

  Peter Labelle

  I don't have a RV042 and have had reference to the Administrator's guide:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/routers/CSBR/RV042/Admin/Guide/RV042_V10_UG_C-Web.PDF

  I hope these comments are useful. Perhaps you can comment and let me know if it works for you. Check balancing load and the binding protocol section.  These changes are disruptive... Please assume a failure during the change.  Not a long interruption, but the sessions at the same distance could be lowered.

  Out, you can use the protocol binding. This could cause some problems with the VPN client... you can try this after hours?

  For entrants, how customers and remote computers know the accounting software?  You are advertising this IP address via a link or another?

  If you are, then you can have a preference through one of the links.  If you advertise this IP address then you will not be able to provide a preference to a supplier of services on the other.

  Do please see the Administrator's guide and let me know your thoughts.  Sincere greetings and HTH,

  Andrew Lissitz

• Load balancing ASA question - what IP I do direct clients too?

  I have 2 5520 with SSLVPN 50 user on each license. I want to use the VPN load-balancing feature. Must I send users to the address IP of Cluster? The documentation is not clear on this point.

  Thank you

  Justin

  That is right. You should have the VPN to connect on the LBS, not individual IP addresses cluster IP. Captain ASA will listen to connection requests to the IP cluster LB and based on the load either accepting the connection or automatically redirect to one of the ASAs Eve in the cluster. It must all be transparent to the user VPN connection.

• IPSec over TCP works on VPN 3030 interface (3) external?

  I configured the third external interface and can connect with the ESP and UDP tunnel, but not with IPsec over TCP.

  The customer says:

  Unexpected TCP control packet received a.b.c.d, src port 10000, port dst 4408, flags 14: 00

  the hub said nothing, although I tried several event classes

  the document said "IPSec over TCP works with the VPN client software and hardware VPN 3002 client. It only works on the public interface. It is a client to the function of hub only. It does not work for LAN-to-LAN connections. "

  This means - it works on the public interface real, physical?

  or it should work on the external interface if I click on the checkbox to its public interface?

  Thanks for any advice,

  Martin

  IPSec over TCP is designed to operate only on the real public interface #2.

  There were a few technical reasons behind it, among them:

  (1) some clients cancel their tunnels on the private interface (one-arm-config) and that would cause a headache when trying to HTTP through the VPN 3000 if IPSec/TCP has been installed for Port 80/443. We decided to pull out of the private Interface.

  (2) that the external interface #3, we have chosen not to enable IPSec/over TCP Dynamics fielterso n it mainly because of the load balancing.

  Since the LB only works on real public interface #2, even once, we chose to leave

  IPSec/TCP out of it.

  Nelson

• Correct settings to use Smart Connect and load balancing?

  Hi guys

  I have a question, the answer of which I was not able to find explicitly, so I hope a quick fix OK / not OK for you:

  I would use tri-band technology provides the R8000, i.e. to activate Smart Connect / load balancing. Is - it only works Ghzs 5 band, or the router can also connect clients on the 2 Ghz bands?

  If this is true, then I need to give the strip of 2, 4 GHz the SSID the same 5 Ghz band, correct?

  Otherwise, if it only works in the 5 Ghz bands, I could keep the SSID distinguishes?

  Thank you

  Balancing of resources between the two radios. 2, 4 GHz band vs a single radio, the two radio channels in the 5 GHz band.

• Network Load Balancing error

  Hello

  I have DC with 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.0 P.DNS 192.168.10.2 & ADC 192.168.10.3 P.DNS 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.0

  When I configure the network load balancing in win2012r2 std I get below error. Please help on this.

  "NLB Manager running on a system with all networks bound to NLB mifht does not work as expected.
  If all interfaces are ser to run NLB in "unicast" mode, Manager NLB will fail to connect to the hosts. »

  Thank you.

  This issue is beyond the scope of this site (for consumers) and to be sure, you get the best (and fastest) reply, we have to ask either on Technet (for IT Pro) or MSDN (for developers)
  *
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home s/fr-U.S./Accueil
  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/Forum

• What load balancing algorithm using the LRT224?

  I was wondering if anyone knew what algorithm of load balancing the LRT224 use since I can't find it anywhere and the telephone support line does not.  It is very similar to the RV320 of Cisco that uses Weighted Round Robin, but I don't think that the Linksys uses this algorithm because it includes speeds of bandwidth unlike the cisco that does not work.  and if anyone can also check that this unit doesn't package base rather than load balanced session load balancing.  as much information as possible would be appreciated!

  The standard of the LRT load balancing is alternated:

  Example:

  1 TCP connection to website-online WAN1

  2 TCP connection to website2.com-online WAN2

  3 TCP connection to website2.com-online WAN1

  4 TCP connection to website1.com-online WAN2

  If you enable the feature (recommended) sticky load balancing load balancing is done on a base per session instead of the base of the connection.

  Example:

  1 TCP connection to website-online WAN1

  2 TCP connection to website2.com-online WAN2

  3 TCP connection to website2.com-online WAN2

  4 TCP connection to website1.com-online WAN1

• SRW2008 load balancing

  Hi, what is the best way to balance the two connectrions with SRW2008 internet? Is possible to also "switch"?

  Thank you in advace

  Nino

  Aggregation of links (sometimes called "Bundling") combines two or more physical ports into a single logical port. After that, you have only one logical port. This allows you to increase the bandwidth on a link. To use it, you must connect the ports combined in another switch/device that supports the same and has the same configuration.

  So, Yes to use the aggregation of links, you'll need another switch like the SRW2008.

  However, the aggregation of links isn't load balancing. The logical port is still a single connection, even if it's running on multiple threads. It must connect to the same physical device.

• RV042 load balancing

  If I set up the router to load balance between my cable connection and DSL connection I see no advantage if I only have one computer connected to the router?

  Thank you

  David

  I think that you will not see much of a difference if you only use one computer.

• Maxum interfaces for the load balancing wan

  Hi all

  You know the interfaces maximum wan that I can use for load balancing?

  Hi Iimran,

  Lets say your sonicwall has N interfaces. You can use the interfaces wan (N-1) for load balancing

  Kind regards

  Barath R

  #IWork4Dell