RV042 load balancing problem

Similar Questions

• RV042 load balancing

  If I set up the router to load balance between my cable connection and DSL connection I see no advantage if I only have one computer connected to the router?

  Thank you

  David

  I think that you will not see much of a difference if you only use one computer.

• Problem with load balancing

  Hello

  I have a model SAN SUN 7117 and ESXi server in a HP DL120G6. The SAN has 4 of the NIC for iSCSI traffic and the ESX has 4 NIC, but only 2 NIC's for iSCSI. In the SAN, I configured an LACP aggregation with 4 NIC problem is that, in the ESXi, I see that only one NETWORK adapter works.

  What is the problem?

  There are some screenshots of setting anchors.

  

  SAN CONFIGURATION

  

  If you need any screenshoot credit information ask for me.

  How can I test and check that the load balancing is working correctly?

  Thank you!

  As previous authors have written, so that the load with a vSwitch policies balancing offers you need more targets and virtual machines more (which is not the case that you use iSCSI).

  Hash IP needs more targets to spread the load.

  Check KB 1011340 and this article: http://vmetc.com/2009/08/12/vswitch-with-multiple-vkernel-portgroups-for-vsphere-iscsi-round-robin-mpio/

  You will find a section he describe different storage vendors have different configurations on the LB on iSCSI, but it's the same with all providers:

  AWo

  VCP 3 & 4

  \[:o]===\[o:]

  = You want to have this ad as a ringtone on your mobile phone? =

  = Send 'Assignment' to 911 for only $999999,99! =

• Problem in Configuration of Hyperion FDM load balance...

  Hi all
  
  I installed hyperion essbase, planning, Hfm and Fdqm 11.1.1.3 version.
  
  but I get error when setting up the configuration of fdm load balance...
  
  error: when I click on test connection in authentication providers (Shared services (CSS))... get the error message like cannot create ActiveX component
  
  Please give me answer if you know about it.
  
  Kind regards
  
  Mady

  This error indicates that the dcom COMJNIBRIDGE object is not able to successfully launch or it was not properly registered on the FDM application server:

  (a) start > run > DCOMCNFG
  (b) expand Component Services > computers > my computer > DCOM CONFIG
  (c) locate the COMJNIBRIDGE object, right-click and choose "Properties".
  (d) click the identity tab and choose "This user" and look for the Service of FDM account and enter and confirm the password
  (e) re - test

• Load balancing question

  Hi all

  I have a question on the load balancing between several hosts of session.

  We have 6 Guest session, I created a managed with a specifik balancing application rule "Session desktop host advanced remotely. last Friday, he started a few problems, but we have not made any changes.

  the fist session host server had 71 active users and other servers were only 30.

  How is that possible?

  Do I have to put the rule on each server load balancing?

  Hello Sander,

  You must apply the rule individually for each RDSH of load balancing. Not on the managed desktop application. In our configuration, this does not work then maybe of the same counts for you.

  concerning

  Sijtze

• VPN 3030 - balancing problem

  Hi all

  I had set up on VPN 3030 of load balancing. On it, he had a few problems. Firstly, 3030 high school has more RAM (512) that the primary (128). The secondary was purchased just a month back with 512 M RAM and latest OS 4.1.7.

  (1) land of redirected to the secondary hub, after active LB normal VPN clients. There are more than 10-15 connections that landed on the secondary and none landed on the primary. I understand that this is because the captain now less connections... is that good? But why is there not all connections on the master?

  (2) web VPN didn't work that well with load balancing enabled. HTTPS protocol and the virtual IP address does not work. When tried with the physical separately IPs, it works, but not with the virtual IP address. port 443 opens not with the virtual IP address. Why is this? can I configure something else for this?

  I also noticed that once you activate load balancing, redirection is done directly on physical IP addresses, which means that end users will know the physical IP addresses and connect directly if they need. Why is this? can someone shed light on this?

  REDA

  To answer one of your questions, I think that primary will have connections only when the secondary a number of minimum connections...

• To balance the load or not load balance? ISE and F5 Big IP

  My team is currently negotiating to put our two devices of ISE (nodes PSN) behind our F5 load balancing deployment.

  Our network is relatively small (5K users) with a small deployment wireless (Cisco 4 controllers with 300 access points). Growth of the network should remain relatively small in the years to come.

  We will deploy Dot1X wired, followed by reclamation and the assessment of posture. (BYOD isn't an option).

  On the one hand, the characteristics of Big IP could make it easier for us to perform load balancing, maintenance and troubleshooting.

  On the other hand, the Big IP adds another layer of complexity in an already complex deployment. We already have the ability to balance the load of the switches themselves. Load balancing for the wireless should not be a problem that our deployment is very small and I expect to stay that way. Given the size of my environment, it seems to be relatively little to gain for the additional efforts and the potential pitfalls.

  Someone at - it care to share their honest opinion on this issue?

  Thank you

  Phill

  Load balancers are elegant and do their job well when it comes to distribute the load between servers. You already have a then I would use it if you have technical skills to set it up.

  That being said, if your team is not 100% comfortable with F5 then you should certainly jump. Instead, you can configure your WLCs to use as a primary and secondary Radius Server node #2 node #1 , then your switches use Node #2 as primary and secondary node #1 .

  I hope this helps!

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• How do RV082 access secure web sites load balanced mode

  I just bought a gateway/router RV082 Dual WAN because I have both cable and DSL feeds in my office. Everything works fine until I try to access a secure web site or have a conversation through my Vonage internet phone. In failover mode all works. As soon as I select Load Balancing, I have outages. I do not see this listed anywhere as a 'problem' so there must be some kind of workaround if this isn't a bug. Has anyone else seen this and how did you resolve teas?

  Thank you

  Poul

  ^.. ^

  The problem you are having is your doing load balancing and traffic to the secure Web site is to get out the two wan.  The secure site is waiting for a response from the original wan ip, which has established the connection, and then it receives the response from the other wan ip address.  It is a common problem.  You can do protocol binding tab management system and have everything that your https traffic out a single IP wan, this will fix this issue.

• VPN 3030 load balancing

  Hi all

  Asked me to configure the load balancing between two hub Cisco VPN (Cisco VPN 3030).

  I set up two such boxes mentioned in the cisco Web site

  [url] https://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2284/products_tech_note09186a0080094b4a.shtml [url]

  After you enable VPN load balancing, I get the error described for 30 seconds.

  Quote:

  Master double detected LBSSF [0003a 0889463] and going to SLAVE

  One of my friends said me that try with encryption active but not different.

  I searched in google but did not get any solution. I am now hlepless. If any of you guys have met this kind of problem before could you please help to solve this problem...

  Thank you

  Please set each device to have different priorities and then charge two devices.

  If this does not work then you can confirm your settings of the VCA have been properly configured and applied to the public interface? The following links provide more details on how to configure filters VCA:

  https://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2284/products_tech_note09186a0080094b4a.shtml#C2

  Kind regards
  ATRI

• The implementation of hyperion IR application load balancing while 2 servers point to a DB?

  There is a DB production. Some time need to configure the load balancer for Hyperion interactive report achieve high availability.

  As know there are a lot of method to implement load balancing, want to know if

  given two machines virtual (each of them has its own application server), and two of them going to point to the same DB via shared Assembly called/U01 player.

  After the official documentations of oracle documented, there are scarce resources can refer to, any who knew this case of configuration before?

  Hello

  We have implemented this type of solution:

  (1) server 1: install and configure in usual way. Better to use different patterns for each product.

  When you configure Reporting and analysis framework services give repository location as shared drive location.

  (2) server 2: Installation of any product that has been installed in the server 1. While configure the database for the shared services registry point to detail diagram 1 server, it automatically configure the database for all the other remaining products.

  When you configure Reporting and analysis framework services give location of the repository as a shared drive which gave in Server 1.

  Make sure that the Shared disk is accessible from both servers.

  You can deploy applications weblogic Server from Server 2 by giving details of server 1. ensure that the weblogic Server 1 service must always be upward and running for Server 2 workspace to work.

  So if we set up the web server in both servers, then you must have load balancer and configure logical web address to this server for load balancing.

  If you configure only in one of the server, then this workspace server that url will act as load swing url.the problem with this is always THAT OSH must be running or workspace url will not work

  hope you understood.

• Load Balancing configuration failed with the failure of the connection shared after 11.1.2.2 11.1.2.3 upgrade

  Hello

  We have our EMP system had put 11.1.2.2 to 11.1.2.3 and it's a broadcast environment (Windows 2008 Server) and in one of the server, we installed FDM and after 11.1.2.2 upgrade to 11.1.2.3.

  When we load balance FDM Configuration, SSP is failed with " Shared Services Connection Failed '

  What I did:

  Deleted all entries in the object load balancing DCOM {E652643D...} and the Application Server Config {26AD6592..} and the COMJNIBridge DCOM objects. Re-directed EMP config for FDM application server

  and reconfigured the FDM with mycmsc\svc_hyperionfdm of the user application server. Config of load balancing is still unable to the connection of Shared Services with the error "Shared Services cannot connect".

  I tried the local administrator user but fails in the same way

  Windows system log entries:

  The application-specific permission settings do not grant Local Activation permission for the COM with CLSID {E652643D-6CC1-48AC-915D-01842B04F292} server application and the APPID

  {E652643D-6CC1-48AC-915D-01842B04F292} the user NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM SID (S-1-5-1 of the address LocalHost (using LRPC).

  This security permission can be modified using the Component Services administrative tool.

  Windows Application log entries:

  Recovery of the class factory COM for component with CLSID {E652643D-6CC1-48AC-915D-01842B04F292} failed due to the following error: 80070005.

  COMJNIBridegWrapper.log entries

  08/07/2014 10:42:06: unknown COMException error

  at Microsoft.VisualBasic.CompilerServices.LateBinding.InternalLateCall (Object o, Type objType, String name, Object [] args, paramnames, CopyBack [] Boolean String, Boolean IgnoreReturn) at

  Microsoft.VisualBasic.CompilerServices.NewLateBinding.LateCall (Object Instance, Type, Type, String MemberName, Object [] Arguments, String [] ArgumentNames, TypeArguments, Boolean] [] Type

  CopyBack, Boolean IgnoreReturn) at Hyperion.Fdm.Api.Common.Security.Authentication.AuthenticateUser (String userName, String password, the domain, String String & ssoToken)

  Hello

  Finally, we could solve this problem. Thank you for all your help.

  Kind regards

  VJ

• vRA 7 load balancing with embedded active / standby vRO

  I have a vRA environment 7 with vRA HA devices that have integrated the vRO. I want vRO to an Active/Passive configuration, but when I do the load balancer declares the node with the vRO vRA Eve out of service.

  It seems that between 6.2 and 7 that VMware has changed the vRA health check to watch/vcac/service/api/health instead of/vcac/services/api/status. This new target now fail because it shows a service as in offline mode. While it is fairly clean and is probably better than the old health check, it kills the idea of an active configuration / standby vRO.

  Any ideas on how I can get around this? Thank you!!

  The problem that you are facing is that devices of internal load balancing is managed by HAProxy. I don't have * think * that it promotes health checks, this is why active/active approach for vRO. I suspect that if you want to use Active/passive, you will need to switch to external devices.

  Grant

• Horizon 6.0 HTML Blast connection through an A10 load balancer?

  Hey all.

  After a recent update to 6.0.0 of 5.1, we seek to get HTML Blast connections operation.  We are routing our PCoIP connections through an A10 load balancer.  Now, I'm not the person of networking which set up but from my understanding, we have a VIP configuration for port 443 for our two servers for connection.  With the help of the A10, we set up a second VIP with two connection for port 8443 servers.  Load balanced connections to https://myfriendlyname.domain.com half of the working time.  The time, they do not work you can access the destination page, connection, choose the pool, and then page cannot be displayed or couldn't resolve proxy in Chrome.  If you go to the #2 server directly by going to https://server_name , it works fine.  If you go to the #1 server by going to https://server_name/ it does not work.  Both in the Horizon view Admin > servers > server connection > edit > Blast external URLS are https://myfriendlyname.domain.com/: 8443.  If you change this to the individual server, server #1 will always work.  Just like the #2 server.  So I tell myself, is not a thing of VMware, but something of the A10.  I know that a connection initiated on port 443 must be the same server, generating the connection on port 8443, otherwise it will go down.  I checked with our team of networking and check that the permanent sessions are enabled.  We went over a few rounds with A10 and they encountered no HTLM Blast before.  I saw a few workarounds for F5, but nothing for the A10.

  Does anyone have experience with getting this work with A10?

  Thank you.

  Another updated.  We have allowed the persistence of server on the VIP and that solved the problem.

• Can we do vmotion between hosts with load balancing in network cards grouping different strategy.

  Hello

  We are implementin new host in our Infra and do some vmotions between different groups. A group a host with balancing 'route based on IP hash. " Can we do Vmotion to another cluster where the hosts have different load balancing policies. In addition, if we change the policy on new hosts in furture of load balancing is loss of downtime or a package?

  Kind regards

  Vikram Kumar

  First of all, no problem from VMs one ESX to another, they use different political Multipathing.

  Second, if you use IP hash, it means you are using etherchannel (or LACP) on the physical layer - configuration/cancellation of the configuration that almost always require that the uplinks are not used by any VMs, so you have time to synchronize the physical and virtual configuration. It is not a time out, but you need to plan accordingly - all depends on your physical network capacity.

• Console Proxy doesn't work is not behind the edge load balancer

  I have a strange problem. I set up a load balancer with vShield Edge. Behind the load balancer, I have two cells vCloud. The Web interface works very well for users, but trying to connect a VMRC to view remote screen it displays 'connection' and then the session is disconnected.

  Then I stop the first cell and users can establish a VMRC connection again. When I activate the first cell once again, the web interface continues to work, but not the proxy of the console. Then I stop the second cell and now elements of the console working again.

  Any tips?

  Gabrié

  Have a similar setup and had the same problem.  Two things to check.  Go to c:\users\\appdata\local\temp\vmware- and open the last file vmware-vmrc - xxxx.log.  Towards the end, it should tell you why it's a failure.  For me, it was a conflict of thumbprint SSL, dating back to the different SSL certificates on the cells.  Also, be sure to vCloud Director Administration-Public address you have the right audiences VCD console address specified. To resolve the inconsistency of my mark, I just created a file certificates.ks a cell and then copied on the other cell and reran the script configures.  Good luck with VMware to help.  I opened a folder for this issue 6 days ago and have yet to get any help!

  -Craig