Vulnerability of POODLE?
As you may know, a wide Internet security problem, commonly referred to as POODLE, has been identified in the last two weeks and affects all those who use the older Web browsers that use SSL version 3 (SSLv3), specifically Internet Explorer (IE) 6. This issue creates a vulnerability that could allow hackers to access any connection using this outdated Web browser.
At BC resolved this or is it already supported. Recently, Google announced that they have a problem with the POODLE.
Hello
Please check this thread stop Authorize.net SSLv3, vulnerability of poodle - BC is not affected
Tags: Business Catalyst
Similar Questions
-
vWorkspace and vulnerability SSL POODLE
In order to mitigate the vulnerability of POODLE on my secure gateway server, I tried to disable SSL 3.0. TLS 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2 are enabled.
I can connect is no longer on. The web proxy works and shows the applications, but when I try to start an application it fails. Enable SSL 3.0 back allows me to log on.
Scott.
Hello
Kevin Robinson here the support Manager, Yes please install this hotfix required to solve the problem you have.
Let us know if this solves your problem.
Thank you
Kevin
-
Small business switches and POODLE
Cisco did research in small business switches being vulnerable to POODLE? I know they are working hard on the side of the business, but I'm not finding any information on the side of small business.
Hello
All Cisco products will be checked and the results are displayed on the same page for the company:
http://Tools.Cisco.com/Security/Center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/CIS...
Kind regards
Aleksandra
-
WSA virtual S100V of 8.0.8 upgrade - 113
Why my had virtual S100V does not list upgrades beyond 8.0.8 - 113? I want to migrate code 8.5, but same navigation through the docs to 8.1, 8.5, 8.7 none list a path of the 8.0.8 upgrade - 113? Am I missing something?
Hello
If the device is already on 8.0.8 - 113 for virtual appliance, that he should not see 8.5 or 8.5.1 code since this version does not have the correction of a vulnerability of POODLE.
The development team working on the version 8.5.2 right now that will have this fix and must be a path to this version of 8.0.8
-
CISCO Anyconnect and using TLS V1.2
Hello
I ran an anyconnect VPN Service that uses SSLv3, after POODLE, we moved on TLSv1, which worked well, but I have recently been informed that TLSv1 is also vulnerable to POODLE.
I upgraded to the latest version of the software firewall (it is a 5512 ASA) and TLSv1.2 - which stopped the work VPN was allowed, once it has been activated customers started anyconnect have reported that they were behind a captive portal, despite the fact that he is certainly no captive portal. I get the same problem with TLSv1.1 - How can I get this to work - I'm really stuck and not an expert CISCO.
Thank you very much
Hi James,
What is the version of ASA and anyconnect here? Only anyconnect 4.x support TLS 1.2 and ASA 9.3 (2).
http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/vpn_client/AnyConnect/ANYC...
Kind regards
Kanwal
Note: Please check if they are useful.
-
OEM not accessible in most recent browsers Chrome\IE
Hello
Recently, we have improved our versions of browser Chrome and IE and now we were not able to open OEMS in these browsers. We get the error in Chrome v48 page, if I open v38 Chrome, I'm able to access back to OEM.
SSL server is probably obsolete.
ERR_SSL_FALLBACK_BEYOND_MINIMUM_VERSION
Recently, we have improved our versions of browser Chrome and IE and now we were not able to open OEM (OEM 11 g grid) in these browsers. We get the error in Chrome v47 page, if I open v38 Chrome, I'm able to access back to OEM.
Chrome v38 we get your connection is not private, but still, we can at least perform OEM to launch.
Can someone help me understand what it takes to solve this problem.
Thank you
Hello
Most likely, it is because you are using sslv3, whose recent browsers disable by default due to a vulnerability called POODLE https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2014/10/14/the-poodle-attack-and-the-end-of-ssl-3-0/
Please refer to the Oracle's this Note: cannot access Enterprise Manager 11g Grid Control of Console (probably obsolete SSL server). (Doc ID 2053331.1) for the solution.
-
Hello
have trouble when I first updated my signature single vCenter Server and later update my vSphere hosts?
A vCenter Server Version 5.5.0U3b should be able to manage vSphere Host Version 5.5.0 GA, right?
Kind regards
Roland
The vCenter Server 5.5 update 3 b can manage VMware ESXi ESX release GA to 5.5 5.5 update 3 b, take a look: VMware product interoperability Matrices
BUT, according to the interoperability matrices and vCenter Server 5.5 update 3 release notes, VMware strongly recommends you upgrade your hosts to 5.5 update 3 b, see:
What's new
- Update Support for the SSLv3 Protocol is disabled by default
Note: In your vSphere environment, you must update vCenter Server vCenter Server 5.5 update 3 b before the update to 5.5 ESXi ESXi update 3 b. vCenter Server will not be able to manage 3B ESXi 5.5 update, if you update ESXi before update vCenter Server to version 5.5 update 3 b. For more information about the sequence in which vSphere environments must be updated, see KB 2057795.
- VMware strongly recommends you update ESXi hosts to ESXi 5.5 update 3 b management of vCenter Server 5.5 updated 3B.
VMware does not recommend the reactivation of SSLv3 because of the vulnerability of POODLE. If all you must enable SSLv3, you must activate the SSLv3 Protocol for all components. For more information, see.- Resolved issues. This version of vCenter Server 5.5 update 3 b solves the problems that have been documented in the resolved issues section.
- Update Support for the SSLv3 Protocol is disabled by default
-
SHA-1, replaced by SHA - 2 certificates
Anyone know anything about the impact or plans for SHA-1 and SHA-2 certificates in British Colombia? Google and Microsoft plan to change their browser about certificates. And this can impact the payment gateways.
Our customers have started to receive notifications of their payment gateway providers that they put current to SHA - 2. What I've read, that is a problem with SSLv3.0 (POODLE - feat "Padded Oracle"). SSLv3.0 support will be disabled I understand. I guess that this will concern the BC payment gateways. Adobe BC team could comment on this please? Thank you!
Hi Simon,.
BC has already said he will do by poodle and andy changes etc.
Authorize.NET SSLv3 shutdown, vulnerability of poodle - BC is not affected
-
Hello, I heard the sslv3 34 version is no longer supported in firefox but I currently have firefox 34.0.5 and poodletest says: I'm vulnerable how can I fix my vulnerability?
found it turns it off, he said now I'm not vulnerable
-
I have the latest version of Firefox installed on one of my PC, not this one, Windows 7 Professional. When I ran the test SSL3 he returned my Firefox browser is vulnerable. I looked everywhere to find a solution for this and cannot. Please help me with this.
Thank you
From Firefox 34.0 vulnerable SSL 3.0 has been disable and TLS 1.0 is used by default. https://blog.Mozilla.org/security/2014/10/14/the-poodle-attack-and-the-end-of-SSL-3-0/
The security.tls.version.min about: config must be set to 1 by default which means TLS 1.0 is the minim, uh and not SSL 3.0 which is set to 0 on the preference.
You have Avast? as the analysis of https in Avast can actually make your less secure connection in some cases and cause problems of this kind. So if you have Avast disable https analysis in Avast. Some other antivirus scanners may have an effect on this also.
-
POODLES SSLv3 effect Mozilla Firefox?
This breach of poodle SLL effect Firefox v3? My Firefox must updated?
Answer soon!
Jacob
Firefox tries to use the very latest method of connection (TLS 1.2) with websites and then '' 1.1 TLS, TLS 1.0 and SSL 3.0 finally returns if the site does not support a more recent method.
If you want to prevent Firefox falling back to SSL 3.0, so that you will not without knowing a poodle-vulnerable connection, you can change a setting so that it is never used in SSLv3. Some sites may not work with this setting, but I think it will be very little.
Here's how:
(1) in a new tab, type or paste Subject: config in the address bar and press ENTER. Click on the button promising to be careful.
(2) in the search above the list box, type or paste tls and make a pause so that the list is filtered
(3) double-click the security.tls.version.min preference and change the value from 0 to 1
That means, the will of the lowest Firefox is TLS 1.0. I actually did this change me this afternoon for the same reason.
-
Is the opinion of 12/02/2015 to install the fix really vulnerability in firefox?
After the closure of 3 text boxes released firefox indicating is 93%, at risk and needs to be reinstalled with the correction code. The Web site noted was strange and seems not related to Mozilla. I chose not to run his link. There is a vulnerability in need of closure?
No, it's not Mozilla or the Firefox web bowser. Scammers use the popularity of Firefox and try to mislead the less experienced users of Firefox and or Windows to download an .exe to infect Windows.
Updates of Firefox on Windows, Mac OSX and Linux are are in the browser Firefox itself or download on https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/all
Mozilla does not .exe patches or do they host updates on randomly selected sites outside of *. Mozilla.org
-
I had problems with Firefox crashing lately, and it may have something to do with one of the plugins. So I checked the plugins that I have, and I noticed that I have Java DT 8.0.660.18 installed, but there is a warning that the plugin can be vulnerable. I have Windows XP, (yes I know, stupid Microsoft can't not help XP), and so to get the latest version of this will be difficult, if not impossible. Should I change the setting in my Firefox "never activate?
I believe that we are at the root of the problem. For some time my Firefox browser was slow, has been suspended for a bit and crashed 5 times in 3 minutes Thursday. Now that I've refreshed Firefox, even with Trend Micro inserted in, my browser runs faster than ever before. Has collapsed yet, no snap and now I know what the problem could be seized becomes a problem. Thank you, FredMcD and the team!
-
Silverlight 5.1.40728.0 reported by 41.0.1 as vulnerable Firefox / "update now" when I check my plug-ins are up-to-date. By clicking on the button takes me to the MS Silverlight download site, but all I get from following instructions is same version of Silverlight and Firefox same result. What is vulnerability? Why Silverlight can't be updated? I am sure to leave Silverlight as it is or should I turn it off? Or what? Why declare as vulnerable and who need to update if there is no recourse?
I think I found the answer - it's those pesky DRM vultures pushing again equivalent HTML5 cos that gives them more control over the things that we want to watch through browsers - discover this place for more information:
http://www.DefectiveByDesign.org/what_is_drm_digital_restrictions_management
See what I mean? Why not register? -
Font problem after updating MS omnibox are a vulnerability
Since 21 July update for a vulnerability of Microsoft Font, character in the omnibox display is faulty.
This seems to happen only in the input box, the list is ok.
for example. I type www and the display shows just the white characters (but the cursor seems to have moved).
If I type www... I have vacuum or jumbled characters until I get at least 12 characters in the box, then it appears.You can try to disable hardware acceleration in Firefox.
- Tools > Options > advanced > General > Browsing: "use hardware acceleration when available.
You will need to close and restart Firefox after enabling/disabling this setting.
You can check if there is an update for your display driver graphic card and search for hardware acceleration of related issues.
Start Firefox in Safe Mode to check if one of the extensions (Firefox/tools > Modules > Extensions) or if hardware acceleration is the cause of the problem.
- Put yourself in the DEFAULT theme: Firefox/tools > Modules > appearance
- Do NOT click on the reset button on the startup window Mode safe
Maybe you are looking for
-
I'm showing how TestStand can recover data from a c# method DLL returning an array of type struct. I created a custom type in TestStand corresponding to the .NET signature structure, but I keep running into the same error: «No corresponding in the "L
-
63xl ink: what printers use a 63 ink?
How can I find a list of all printers that use HP 63xl ink cartridges? I recently picked up a DeskJet 2132 (impulse buy) to use in my office (he was super, thx!), but for my home office (several laptops, tablets and desktop wireless) I need a printer
-
Delete request for passage to recyl bin y 'recyl bin nothing '?
-
Is it possible to have two mice connected at the same time?
Hello. I have a gamer mouse, and I am pretty tired of changing the battery every now and then. So I was wondering if I could connect a wired mouse, I could use on the desktop, while my current mouse is always connected - for when I want to do some ga
-
How fix the error code 0xc004e003 windows activation
I have an 0xc0043003 error code when activation window. Here is the report MGAD report of diagnosis (1.9.0027.0):-Data Validation of Windows--> Code of validation: 0 Cached Code of Validation online: n/a, hr = 0xc004f012 Windows product key: *-* - YG