Webfont Glitch - fonts Look the same

Similar Questions

• I tried for AN HOUR to find a way to put the two different fonts on the same line

  Pages is crap. I tried for AN HOUR to find a way to put the two fonts on the same line, even if I highlight 1 WORD, the whole line changes (if you know how to do that please tell me, I'll me CRAZY!). Wouldn't recommend, that Word is 100 x better and easier to use

  < published by host >

  Hi varn,.

  Seems to work here (Pages of screen capture):

  

  Select (highlight) the text you want to change. Click on the Format brush, and then click Style. Choose the font you want to use.

  The example above is in the text layer. I also tried in a text box and a table cell.

  I also tried to change the font for a single word of a line of text in Pages for iOS. The police has changed to the selected word, while the rest of the line remained in the police, he had previously.

  Cannot test it in 5 Pages, because I have not installed. The above example is Pages ' 09.

  It is possible that you have applied to a paragraph Style, what would change everything in the paragraph containing the insertion point.

  Kind regards

  Barry

  PS: MS Word is available for OS X, if you feel the need to switch.

  B

• How to export images and they look the same on all devices (iPhone, mac, desktop computer book)

  Hello

  I have adobe lightroom cc 2016 and I'm having the hardest time export photos, especially those where I use adjustment brushes and have look the same on all devices, my man book retna I will edit to look how I want, but for example when I look at the same image on the desktop mac dessu I can see all the adjustment brushes I used to darken

  on the 2 pictures below

  the first is what I see, its all uniformly dark and when I look on another device, according to me, which is depicted in the second photo

  (I have more exposed the second to show what I mean)

  I do not know what device who's going to be watching this post, but I hope you can help!

  Thank you! don't know what to do

  

  To ensure maximum viewing compatibility make sure you set the colorspace of the export in sRGB as below:

  

• Develop module, 1:1 and export don't look the same, color questions

  Hello world

  I use the latest version of Lightroom (3.6 if I'm not mistaken) and I am facing a problem very uncomfortable with the develop module.

  I adjusted with precision each luminance of the color and saturation, so it looks pretty good in the preview to develop (made to fit) and did an export...

  The preview that I worked on and export just don't look the same.

  I work with files my DSLR digital D3100 from NIKON on an OSX Mac NAVE 10.7 MBP.

  This may be the external display profile is not properly adjusted because I looked at all the images on the same screen.

  I unchecked all boxes from the preset in the settings window tab.

  Here are some screenshots and exports.

  Good look in the module development (left) and the actual export of the same photo (right)

  

  Please note that I have not activated an option for correction of lens and adjusted any color. This is the RAW file and its direct export.

  Screenshot of the preview window on the noise correction options (left) and the same area once as I zoomed in the main view (right)

  

  I hope this can be fixed or I'm doing something wrong.

  A few days before today I used Camera RAW of PS CS5 to correct my NAVE and maintaining only to exports to JPEG. I decided to use LR 3 on my entire workflow and I'm skeptical...

  Ah yes and please forget all mystake alone in my post, I'm a french student.

  Thank you!

  EDIT: I can meet any required file or the screenshot if necessary. I have a few other photos with the same problem (lots of those indeed...)

  EDIT 2: I found the image has made many more colors acurate (relative to export ones) in the library preview module (magnifying glass I guess)

  The previews in the library are are on JPEGs in a smaller color space.

  adobeRGB. Not in prophotoRGB, which is space (with linear gamma, but which)

  is a detail) used to develop. To make the point, you see the more accurate color

  in general, but you must be aware that not all destinations can actually

  reproduce these colors. There is also still the color noise reduction

  question, you can only see to develop at the 1:1. In the library, because it is

  made a jpeg file, the color noise reduction is applied at each zoom

  level images etc. like this, which tends to desaturate the colors. My guess

  is that this is probably a problem of range. You can check receives in

  Photoshop for adobeRGB profile. The orange on the trees is probably

  always out of gamut.

  That said, how do you calibrate? You should use a Spyder, Huey Pro,

  i1Display, Colormunki or similar to calibrate the screen if you want to

  believe what you see.

• What happened to my bookmark tab when I downloaded the latest version of Firefox. Don't look the same...

  I kept getting a message that says you need to update or you are using an outdated version of foxfire.
  So I have updated or downloaded the new version and my book brand label wasn't in the same place. And it's very different.

  See also:

  • https://support.Mozilla.org/KB/how-to-make-new-Firefox-look-like-old-Firefox
  • https://support.Mozilla.org/KB/common-questions-after-updating-to-new-Firefox
  • https://support.Mozilla.org/KB/learn-more-about-the-design-of-new-Firefox

• How can I get the picture to look the same in the browser?

  That's what it looks like the Muse before Preview:

  This is what it looks like after she spotted in the browser:

  The file is 1600 wide shot as a 3:2 ratio. Note that there is no white at the bottom of the image that appears in the browser.

  I have no idea how to:
  (A) draw the original image so that it fits better. I'm starting to take pictures in 16:9, but this was shot like that.

  (B) implement Muse and pretend that I have no checksum on them.

  I want it to look like the first shot. How can I get closer to it?

  Thank you.

  The top gets cut when an image is scalled to fit... I would try top-left and scale to fill for a better result, but that misses the point.

  A web browser ignores all of the code that do not match the page design and show you which corresponds to its value at the time so the same image in firefox to zero zoom seems different from what chrome shows 200%... When you right click and download this image on your machine, it can then be seen "such what."

  Also your screenshot is not clear, you do this as picture full page or broswer... There are some headers and footers to acount for and one not of full browser is therefore normal for the 100% width images, but it is not set in stone.

  PS, this is why your question "what image size to width full page" did not work because the answer is a browser web will take any image size and display it in full page width for a width of 1600 image also looks good as a width of 400 image... It is the County produce that matters here not the actual size of the image.

• Problem with fonts in InDesign - same font of the same document, different thicknesses

  I was wondering if someone can help me with this problem

  I have a document that I am producing on a page of the police apppears thicker than on other pages.

  I tried to change the font, but the problem remains.

  This problem causes through when I export to PDF, but when I print a physical copy, this problem disappears.

  Can someone help me with this?

  Please see below a cap of the problem form.

  I use InDesign for Windows, Version 7.5 of CS5.5

  

  Will there be transparency on the page?

  It looks like the effect 'breach' common when there is transparency on a page. It shows on the screen and in preints of low resolution, but not, in my opinion, out of press.

• Images from Lightroom do not look the same when opened in PSCS5

  Hello

  I use LR 3 and PS CS5, but an annoying problem that I don't know how to fix. Basically, when I look at a picture in the window inside LR 3, obviously true insofar the contrast and saturation and hue... when I select Edit in Photoshop CS5, the file opens in the PS, but the contrast and saturation and the same hue are a little off. Why?

  Thank you

  Juan

  Juan, note that in Lightroom develop didn't use all the raw data available at a time to give you an overview. She does as otherwise, the program would be unusably slow. Each movement of a slider should give rise to a complete rerendering of the data at full resolution and then reduce the image resolution of the screen. Even on very fast machines out there that lasts about one second that would make all glacial especially on normal computers. So in a zoomed view outside, it takes just a subset of the raw data at lower resolution and uses for rendering. This can subtly affect the saturation in cases where there are a lot of specific details of the colors because there are no average before reaching the lower res image. When you zoom to 1:1, Lightroom simply makes only the small subset of the image you see in your window. Because it is a small subset, it is still once very fast, but is now done at full resolution. To develop, you can only 1:1 see Lightroom apply the noise reduction and levels of sharpening that can also affect the saturation similar to zoom out. Certainly, this will remain a problem until we are a few generations further down the curve of Moore. However, at this time there, the resolution of the cameras will have increased by the same amount as the rest of the problem.

  Now consider what happens when you go to Photoshop. Lightroom (or ACR when you use "Edit in Photoshop") reproduces the image of the raw usually a TIFF 16 bit prophotoRGB. It is then opened in Photoshop. Photoshop doesn't know how to deal with RAW files. He needs a fully rendered RGB image provided by ACR or Lightroom. Now, since you have a fully rendered image, downward revision is very easy. However, you have more freedom to reinterpret raw data. The model used in Photoshop is very different from Lightroom and so different restrictions apply.

  In the Lightroom library views, a prerendered jpeg is used for the display. This means that, in library view, the image is reduced to a fully rendered image and should show a desaturation with respect to develop when you have a lot of specific color details. Note that neither Lightroom overview of the library and scaled down preview Photoshop are actually accurate. The two scale in a corrected gamma space, but for display only. To complicate this, Lightroom evolves down using a different algorithm than Photoshop (which uses several mechanisms based on the zoom level - i.e. If it is divisible by two).  It is simply impossible to precisely display a picture in high resolution on a computer screen very low resolution. Always deal with scaling, for which there is no more correct approach. They have questions (stupid method of Photoshop has certainly).

  Finally, a lot of people who see subtle (or even extreme) differences between Photoshop and Lightroom do have a problem with their monitor profile. Make sure calibrate you re - your monitor, and when you do, make sure that the calibration software generates a v2 profile (most profiling software have this option in advanced settings). Lightroom treats LUT v4 unlike Photoshop monitor profile. This difference will be left in a matrix of v2 profile.

• How to make a figure look the same on all sides

  Hey I have a problem

  As you can see from the photo, I made a star and then added a full circle, that I placed under the star in the upper corner. I want to place the second circle (I want I circles in all outside corners), in one of the corners for sound in the same position in the corner, like the first circle. The problem is that I can't find a way to do that, without doing it manually which used be very precise

  

  Mark the center of the shape.

  Create the star in the Center

  Position of the circle

  Do rotate/duplicate the crircle around the Center

  Object > transform > transform again

• What am I I get for Adobe Creative Cloud with 9.99 by month, then I see you upgrade to 49.99 per month, then I see prepaid 599.99 looks the same thing what is the 9.99 per month give me

  Confused, and I can't stand type, why you can't talk to a human being?

  I signed up for 9.99 per month for 12 months. So I see things like upgrade for what seems to be the same thing. [Deleted profanity] I receive for $10 a month and why pay 50 per month

  or 600 for all. You feel you end up spending a lot of money for ever with so much a month. I see a lot of programs

  walking around now on the band wagon to get people to spend a certain amount per month forever.

  Help

  Here is a link to the various plans: plans pricing and membership creative cloud | Adobe Creative Cloud

  Basically, for $9.99, you get Photoshop and Lightroom.

  For $49.99, you get all the CC apps.

• Buttons and links: must they always open a ContextMenu and always look the same?

  Hello

  I started with Blackberry 2 days: I'm doing a layout with a few buttons and some links.

  I have two trivial (but very important) questions:

  (1) my buttons work well, but when I click on them not only my defined action happen (from my FieldChangeListener), but also a kind of context Menu opens. I don't want to.

  It is typical for Blackberry users get such a menu? How can I remove this?

  (I'm extension screen and put my buttons in a HorizontalFieldManager)

  (2) I could not change the appearance of the buttons. If I do not watch something, if you use the standard button, you can change, say, the color, or make the border transparent so that you only have a text without this button around, I'm wrong? (I need confirmation, because it is difficult to find this information explicitly during playback..).

  For this reason, I used for a particular case (a small link to the next screen, which may not look like a big button) a * ActiveRichTextField * instead of a button. It is very nice... but... . How can I add the action at this link, so that it behaves like a button? For the moment I can not click on it at all!

  I tried this (but it does not work..):

  RTF ActiveRichTextField = new ActiveRichTextField("Impressum",RichTextField.TEXT_ALIGN_RIGHT);
  _fieldManagerBottom.Add (RTF);

  FieldChangeListener listenerImpressum = new FieldChangeListener() {}
  ' Public Sub fieldChanged (field field, int context) {}
  _fieldManagerMiddle.DeleteAll ();
  LabelField impressumtext = new LabelField ("i m p r e s s u m blah blah blah");
  _fieldManagerMiddle.Add (impressumtext);
  }
  };

  rtf.setChangeListener (listenerImpressum);

  I would be grateful if you could anwser at least some of my questions (better than nothing)...

  Thank you in advance!

  silizia

  Create your style CONSUME_CLICK buttons and they should not open a context menu thing.

• Someone at - it overcome the problems get CMYK colors to look the same as RGB colors?

  Hello

  It is a first for me.  Thanks in advance for any input.

  I'm working on a CMYK created .psd file.  I have the whole doc but my problem is that I cannot reproduce the colors I have in a similar document RGB.  I tried copying all layers above the RGB file to the CMYK file, but the color is still off - path.  Hot blue becomes dark purple.

  This is for printing (business card).

  The RGB color is #0000ff.  I looked around and did not find a comparable colour in cmyk palette.  I tried some of line converters rbg to CMYK, but nothing helps.

  Am I missing something or is there no way to solve this problem?

  Thanks in advance...

  you want to read about Photoshop in colours of the range, test colors, never...

  http://www.gballard.NET/PSD/cmstheory.html#gamut

  hot blue, purple, and green in the RGB look terrible during the conversion to CMYK, because they translate well

• My CSS is not formatting my pages to look the same in IE, Firefox and Chrome [subject edited by Moderator]

  I have created many websites and they all tend to be slightly different, with different browsers. It's especially in positioning, especially when I stack objects after the other. I want to say here is that I have a site with a header and a footer of main content. It looks perfect with Chrome, but the footer happened slightly in FF or IE. If I have the code for FF, Chrome can display 'properly '. I know it's probably my CSS so I need a source that will tell me the differences for each browser. Or do I put code in my CSS to settle differences within each browser? Such as "if IE, margin-top: 1em;" If FF, margin-top: .5em; ", if Chrome, top of the margin: 0em;

  Suggestions (and yes I know that the above code is incorrect. I am just lazy up the correct syntax.

  Thank you

  Scott

  Near perfect pixel is simply not possible in view of the change in browser.  But if you see dramatic differences, it is more likely related code than not.

  98% of the browser rendering issues are related to errors in code.  Clean code is usually the best way to ensure good cross browser results.  Use the following online validation services and fix the errors reported.

  • HTML - http://validator.w3.org/
  • HTML5 - https://validator.w3.org/nu/

• Select the fonts of the same size

  I use Illustrator CS5 on Windows XP.

  I have a layer containing the type of different font sizes.

  Is there a way to select the type of a particular font size?

  Is there a script I can use to achieve this.

  I have searched through the forum and saw that this has been asked before, but found no solution.

  Thank you

  That all scripts works thanks for the heads up moluapple.

  

  A lot of the way which the Quark Xpress plug worked

• Why my firewall only use the domain user name and password for login and enable passwords, not a different password enable as do it my switches? RADIUS config looks the same...

  / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name: "Table Normal" "; mso-knew-rowband-size: 0; mso-knew-colband-size: 0; mso-style - noshow:yes; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-style-parent:" ";" mso-padding-alt: 0 to 5.4pt 0 to 5.4pt; mso-para-margin: 0; mso-para-margin-bottom: .0001pt; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; do-size: 10.0pt; do-family: "Times New Roman", "serif" ;} "}

  Question:

  Firewalls Cisco requires that one level of password, i.e. the domain user name and password are used for logging as that to reach the global configuration mode.

  Background:

  We have several network devices Cisco, put in place who authenticate to our Windows using NPS (Windows 2008 R2) DC. Switches we have implemented the function exactly as we would wish that they need your domain user name and password to connect to the device. Then they require a separate password when you use the enable command, it is stored in Active Directory:

  Switches:

  User name:domain-username

  Password:password-field

  SWITCH >Activate

  Password:Enable-password - to-Active Directory

  SWITCH #.

  Firewalls (as they are now):

  User name:domain-username

  Password:password-field

  Firewall >enable

  Password:password-field

  FIREWALL #.

  With the firewall, however, they require your domain user name and password first and then your domain password again when you use the enable command. I want to reuse the firewall to use the level that currently switches enable password rather than the password of domain. The appearance of the current configuration as follows:

  Current configuration of the switch:

  AAA new-model

  AAA authentication login default local radius group

  AAA authentication enable default group enable RADIUS

  AAA authorization exec default local radius group

  AAA - the id of the joint session

  ACCT-port of 1645 auth-port host 192.168.0.1 Server RADIUS 1646

  Server RADIUS ports source-1645-1646

  RADIUS server key 7 1234abcd

  Current configuration of the firewall:

  RADIUS protocol AAA-server DC01

  AAA-server DC01 (outside) host 192.168.0.1

  authentication AAA ssh console LOCAL DC01

  Console to enable AAA authentication LOCAL DC01

  1234abcd keys

  Any help would be great, thanks!

  You must use GANYMEDE + instead of RADIUS for this.

  Here, you can use command sets in the results section of the policy.