What is the difference between cached and no cached TT tables

Hi all

I have three users in my Timesten

User Admin 1.TimesTen - cache
2 - cacheuser user cache manager
3.cbs_owner user schema (which is the same name as the user of oracle schema)


I have a few groups of cache in timesten for oracle tables, I created some tables on user schema TTs to compile tables pacakges.these not associted with groups of cache;


My question is what is the difference between cahed tables (tables associted with cache groups) and not cached (associted with any group of cache) TTs schema user, nice tables want to help me

example-

Command > tables;

CBS_OWNER. ACCOUNT_SUBSCRIBER / / table belongs to the Group of cache
CBS_OWNER. OFFER_REF / / not belogs to any group of table cache



Thank you
-AK

Published by: AK08 on June 13, 2010 23:30

I just started to investigate TimesTen... and I think that the cache groups allow you to replicate data to and from Oracle. for example
-Group of cache Read-Only: spreading tables cached in Oracle to TimesTen.
-Group of asynchronous/synchronous cache: spreading the Oracle data.
-User managed group cache: no automatic update or spread.

No cached tables do not have the features of spread.

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

Maybe you are looking for