Which is faster a bit manipulation to the table or image using the vision

Similar Questions

• Initialize controls/indicators: invoke node-local variables Vales. Which is faster?

  Hi all

  I would like to get the opinion of the people. This thought just happened for me while I was reading some materials the other day.

  And I have not found any topic which talks specifically about speed after searching the forum.

  It is faster to initialize your controls/indicators using Invoke node OR write directly to the initial value of your local variables?

  From my experience (not large), I have always used the invoke node to initialize controls or indicators.

  But when I but this question, I did a simple reference point and it seems the local variable approach is faster, especially

  If you have the large number of orders/lights to initialize.

  Am I missing something here? The invoke node running something that writing a value of local variable would not do?

  I thought since you need to set the initial state by default for the node to invoke anyway, why not just write the desired initial value

  your local variables?

  I would appreciate if someone can express his own opinion based on their experience and knowledge.

  Thank you ~ ~

  I may need another Cup of coffee this morning, you are in fact callling the reset by default on each individual control.  My last despises, it is that you use the default method Vals.Reinitialize VI all failing.  It will probably be a bit faster than the method on individual controls.  Still not instant, if.

  Are a few msec is worth to you?  If so and you consider the local path, my advice is to group as many controls as possible into clusters for minimize you headaches.

• x 64 (64-bit) bug in the C API

  I try to get the C API of 64-bit running.  I have the 32-bit running API, and it is not working properly.  It seems that no API call in the 64-bit environment, which returns more than a single data type replaces a box of memory it does not.

  I work in VB.NET and enveloping with a marshaling calls.  The simplest example of a call that is not working properly is querying the active channels on the scope:

  C header:

  niVB_Status NIVB_DECL (niVB_MSO_QueryEnabledAnalogChannels)
  niVB_MSO_InstrumentHandle instrumentHandle,
  char * channels.
  size_t channelsSize,
  size_t * channelsSizeOut);

  There are several different ways to encode a managed, unmanaged for this translation.  First is to use an allocation to build a pointer on a buffer zone:

  Pointer = Marshal.AllocHGlobal (MAX_CSTRING_LENGTH)

  Then, the declaration looks like this:

  _
  Public Shared Function niVB_MSO_QueryEnabledAnalogChannels_64 (ByVal instrumentHandle As Integer, ByVal channel As Integer, ByVal channelsSize As UInteger, ByRef channelsSizeOut As UInteger) as niVB_Status
  End Function

  When the call is made, the call to channelsSizeOut returns 23 characters (which is correct).  Channels IntPtr is however cancelled (this should never happen, he suggests that the battery is getting damaged.)  If I put a very wide range locally around the pointer, sometimes it is not damaged.

  Or you can call the function by using a call to stringbuilder.  Basically, it replaces the IntPtr parameter with a string generator using marshaling for a pointer:

  Dim bufChannels As New StringBuilder (MAX_CSTRING_LENGTH)

  then the call looks like this:

  _
  Public Shared Function niVB_MSO_QueryEnabledAnalogChannels_64 (ByVal instrumentHandle As IntPtr, ByVal channel As StringBuilder, ByVal channelsSize As UInteger, ByRef channelsSizeOut As UInteger) as niVB_Status
  End Function

  Yet once, calling this function causes the stringbuilder class being together (Nothing), which is essentially showing that stack space where is the pointer to the StringBuilder is getting damaged.

  It is important to note that this code works perfectly with the 32-bit version of the DLL (with a programming construct).

  I don't think it's a bug in the C API; I can do the following for both x 86 and x 64 without triggering of MSVC stack Canaries. (Note that for brevity, it does no checking error in this code snippet.)

  #include
  #include
  #include ' nivirtualbench/nivirtualbench.h '.

  int main (int argc, char * argv)

  {

  niVB_LibraryHandle libHandle = NULL;

  niVB_MSO_InstrumentHandle msoHandle = NULL;

  size_t channelsSizeOut = 0;

  char * enabledChannels = NULL;

  niVB_Initialize (NIVB_LIBRARY_VERSION & libHandle);

  niVB_MSO_Initialize (libHandle, "brandonbench", false, & msoHandle);

  niVB_MSO_QueryEnabledAnalogChannels (msoHandle, NULL, 0, & channelsSizeOut);

  enabledChannels = (char *) calloc (channelsSizeOut, sizeof;

  niVB_MSO_QueryEnabledAnalogChannels (msoHandle, enabledChannels, channelsSizeOut, & channelsSizeOut);

  printf ("permit to channels: %s\n", enabledChannels);

  Free (enabledChannels);

  niVB_MSO_Close (msoHandle);

  niVB_Finalize (libHandle);

  }

  I suspect that the problem is in your marshaling. Size_t parameters are probably better represented using System.UIntPtr and not the type UInteger; size_t is 32-bit on 32-bit platform and 64 bits on 64-bit platforms, but UIntegers are 32-bit at a time. Try to write channelsSizeOut, it's probably what is triggering the corruption of the stack.

• 32-bit windows on the computer OEM portable 64-bit?

  Hi guys!

  I use a lenovo g550 model with an Intel t4500 Penium 20023. official website of the intel, as you can see here, this processor has a 64-bit instruction set, which shows that he is a computer portable 64-bit... But when this laptop was brought, it was delivered with windows 7 32-bit Home Basic. According to what I know, there should be a 64-bit version of this version of windows. I want to know why was shipped like that and if I can pass an operating system Windows 64 bits of purchases.

  Thanks in advance,

  @reya

  32 bit OS is the basic option for more pre-built for specific basic laptop. If you need 64-bit OS, you can try to find a 64-bit version of Win 7 home base somewhere, install it and then activate it with the windows serial No. you have on the sticker of authenticity of mobile.

  Lenovo will charge you for the 64 bit version of the recovery media.

• Compile 32-bit programs on the cDAQ RT Linux

  I have a (OR-9134) running Linux RT NI cDAQ

  I am unable to get it compile 32-bit programs. The steps I've done were:

  1 used "opkg" to install all the 'gcc', 'CPP', "gcc-symlinks", etc. - that I could see associated compilers.

  2 export CFLAGS = "-m32' export CXXFLAGS ="m32", export LDFLAGS = 'm32'"

  3 CFLAGS = "-m32". / configure

  However only 64-bit binary are generated.

  I'm unable to find through "opkg" all packages associated with 32-bit builds or anything related to 'multilib '. Could you get it someone please let me know how do NI Linux RT generate binary 32 bits?

  Looks like you are saying that you need a 32-bit library to work with 32-bit LabVIEW. However, LabVIEW on your target cDAQ is 64-bit, as all software on our basic objectives of Linux RT Atom (the ARM-based targets are 32-bit). So, if you want your HDF5 library to run on the target of the cDAQ to 64-bit, you must use a 64-bit version of HDF5. This is true even if you connect/deployment to the target of a 32-bit version of LabVIEW.

  Of course, if you want to run HDF5 on a 32-bit system, as a target of LabVIEW RT with ARM 32-bit processor, or LabVIEW RT older targets that use VxWorks or Phar Lap instead of Linux, or a 32-bit desktop machine running Windows or any other OS, you will need a 32-bit version of HDF5. But I would not recommend trying to build HDF5 for these environments of your cDAQ. I recommend compiling natively on the cDAQ, if you at all (*), for the code, you intend to run on the cDAQ.

  (*) You should be aware of this already, but you can cross - compile your HDF5 library using Eclipse, i.e. http://www.ni.com/download/labview-real-time-module-2014/4846/en/ - some people prefer this to the compilation on the target, which is a little limited resources.

• Running game - this version of the file is not compatible with the version of Windows you are using. Check your computer's system information to see whether you need a x 86 (32 bit) or an x 64 (64-bit) version of the program

  I'm having the same problem that is described in this topic: http://social.answers.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/vistagaming/thread/f15edea1-f88f-492e-bb42-4db2b06fdf05

  My error message is: "this version of the file is not compatible with the version of Windows you are using. Check your computer's system information to see whether you need a x 86 (32 bit) or an x 64 (64-bit) version of the program and then contact the software publisher. »

  I tried to run the program in question (Castle of the winds) in each mode of compatibility that is on the list and it is giving me this error message every time. Other people have managed to get the program to work, so I don't know, it does not work on Windows 7, but I can't make it work for me.

  Help?

  Hi autohaptic,

  (a) on the computer what Edition\Version of Windows 7 operating system do you use? What type of system? 32-bit or 64-bit

  If you are running Windows 7 64-bit operating system, you can install the 64-bit computer game program.

  (b) on the computer which the castle of the winds game version are you running?

  I want to clarify, if you try to install the program or trying to run.

  Step 1: Put the computer in a clean boot, and then try to run the game

  Follow step 1 in the link below,

  How to troubleshoot a problem by performing a clean boot in Windows Vista or in Windows 7

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929135

  Important: n ' forget not the computer to start normal follow step 7 in the link.

  You can consider the right version of the game for your computer relocation program.

  Make older programs in this version of Windows

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/make-older-programs-run-in-this-version-of-Windows

  Thank you, and in what concerns:

  Ajay K

  Microsoft Answers Support Engineer

  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• ANY METHOD IN WHICH WINDWS XP 32 BIT CAN SUPPORT FOUR GAEREMYNCK RAM?

  POUVEZ WINDOW XP 32-BIT SUPPORT 4 GB OF RAM

  POUVEZ WINDOW XP 32-BIT SUPPORT 4 GB OF RAM

  Yes... but not all of it will be usable.  Part of the problem is permissible and it is memory mapped.

  http://msdn.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366778.aspx#physical_memory_limits_windows_xp

  http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2008/07/21/3092070.aspx :

  While 4 GB is the limit for 32-bit client SKUS, the effective limit is actually lower and depends on the chipset of the system and the devices connected. The reason is that the physical address plan includes not only the RAM but memory of the camera as well, and x 86 and x 64 memory card all the unit below the limit to address 4 GB to stay compatible with 32-bit operating systems that do not know how to handle addresses above 4 GB. If a system has 4 GB of RAM and devices, such as video, audio and network cards that implement windows in their memory of the apparatus which amount to 500 MB, 500 MB of the 4 GB of RAM will reside above the limit to address 4 GB, as shown below:

  

  The result is that, if you have a system with 3 GB or more of memory and you use a 32-bit Windows client, you may not be to the benefit of all of the RAM.  On Windows 2000, Windows XP and Windows Vista RTM, you can see how many RAM Windows facing it in the Properties dialog box system, page Manager's performance of tasks and, on Windows XP and Windows Vista (including SP1), in Msinfo32 and Winver utilities. On Windows Vista SP1, some of these places changed RAM installed, rather than RAM available, such as documented in this Knowledge Base article .

  On my laptop 4 GB, when it is started with Vista 32-bit, the amount of physical memory available is 3.5 GB, as seen in the Msinfo32 utility:

  

• MS-DOS 16-bit subsystem. The system does not support the mode full-screen.

  I when even run some dos applications, which allows to work ok under XP mode full-screen, but when you use Vista or Windows 7. I can only rum these applications in a window.
  The error message is

  MS-DOS 16-bit subsystem. The system does not support the mode full-screen.

  Please is anyway I could run in fullscreen... I don't want to use a virtual machine.

  Any advice would be greatly appreciated

  Of Ernest24

  http://www.dosbox.com/

  You might be interested in reading about DosBox.

  See you soon. Mick Murphy - Microsoft partner

• Can I replace Windows Vista with Windows 7 on my laptop which has a 32-bit platform?

  Replace Windows vista with windows 7

  Sam50

  Check the requirements below and run the Windows Upgrade Advisor to see.

  
  Then my computer run Windows 7?
  Basic system requirements are listed below.  Features have additional requirements.

  • 1 gigahertz (GHz) or faster 32-bit (x 86) or 64-bit (x 64) processor

  • 1 gigabyte (GB) of RAM (32-bit) or 2 GB RAM (64-bit)

  • 16 GB of disk space available (32-bit) or 20 GB (64-bit)

  • Graphical device DirectX 9 with WDDM 1.0 or higher driver

  Run Windows Upgrade Advisor to see if there are known problems that might affect installation and if you need to install the 32-bit or the 64 bit version of Windows 7.
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/UpgradeAdvisor

  You can buy Windows 7 here:

  http://www.microsoftstore.com/store/msstore/cat/CategoryID.44066700

  How to upgrade:

  If you have Vista:

  Update: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/help/upgrading-from-windows-vista-to-windows-7

  Custom installation: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/help/upgrading-from-windows-vista-to-windows-7-custom

• The server that you are connected using a security certificate which cannot be verified... The name main target is incorrect... You want to continue using this server?

  All new computer running windows 7 64 bit, outlook and office 2007 installed, initial problems with the temporary user profiles, follow up advice and removed user profiles in the system registry and all seemed to go well. Computer works for about a week with two user profiles and now all of a sudden I get an error message when I start Outlook and from time to time when you browse the internet, it reads:

  The server that you are connected using a security certificate which cannot be verified... The name main target is incorrect... You want to continue using this server? (If I hit Yes then I can send emails)

  When I open view certificate it says: this root CA certificate is not approved. To enable trust, install this certificate into the store certificate authorities roots of trust. (Attributed to and: Cisco device demo certificate - valid from 10/02/2009 to 03/10/2019).

  Problem is I don't know what the certificate is, what I need, to find out how locate, how to move etc, I have read a few forums, but they are starting to be too technical. I need help for step by step easy.

  I tried to uninstall outlook 2007 and reloading and clearing of the States of ssl in internet options, and then reset by default (as someone suggested), but it made no difference.

  Problem is when you leave the store with the new computer, nobody wants to know you if you need assistance!

  Can someone please help? Thank you

  Hello

  Welcome.

  Just a tip, never download and install anything on your PC, unless you know and trust him.

  > «Computer brand new...» I need help for step by step easy. »

  Contact the PC manufacturer emphatically support team.

  > ".. . Office 2007 installed...

  Support to the: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/office/default.aspx#tab=1 and ask your question in Outlook it.

  You can also check if this problem occurs when you use Windows Live Mail, which can be downloaded on: http://download.live.com/wlmail.

  > «Server that you are connected using a security certificate which cannot be verified...» »

  Just learn more about the certification of server to the: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certificate_server .

  Remember: keep the system tools and security update.

  Success.

  Rgds.

  itconcerned

• Several activations phone for the upgrade (reinstall) Win7 32 bit to Win7 64-bit, then run the patch to get Win10 64-bit? Adviser says no need!

  [Subject title changed to take account of the answers and expert advice, the original title was 1 or 2 time phone activation? Failure of the mobo, replace & reinstall Win 7 32 bit (1st time), reinstall as Win 7 64 bit (2nd time?)]

  My mother Office card failed recently, it is installed with retail 32 bit Windows 7 Home Premium and family (3 users) Office 2010 package. Two Microsoft products have product keys.

  My understanding is change of motherboard: computer transfer. While the retail Windows 7 allow to reactivate by phone, but to reactivate Office 2010 will depends on a license agreement (which I haven't checked: 2 installations on computers, died 1 single installation still work left.) Will need to contact the family member to read).

  My 2nd understanding is I can try to connect my hard drive to a new motherboard and let it go through for direct start startup repair. Is better because I don't have data because of the sudden failure of the motherboard (for example bookmarks for the browser explore, can only log into the existing facility backup).

  But being upgraded to the new motherboard (and the new quad core processors), certainly I wouldn't keep running 32-bit system in the future.

  I would reinstall under Windows 7 64-bit later, then a free update to Windows 10 64-bit. (Windows 7 Upgrade Advisor reported that I can not direct implementation installation upgrade from 32 bit to 64 bit Windows 7. Must pass through the new Setup again.)

  Whereas for the 32-bit Office 2010... I could continue to use it as it is if it is allowed to reactivate on new motherboard.

  Now, my question: to reactivate Windows 7 32-bit (and 32-bit Office 2010) with phone, later when I finished the backup of the data and do clean install Windows 7 64 bit (and 32-bit Office 2010), do I need to do to activate by phone, again? Or simply key in the original product key from the license of Windows 7 and Office 2010 already recognized the new motherboard?

  If I need do activate phone 2 times, I might as well direct own to install 64 bit Windows 7 now (despite the loss of some data).

  There is nothing worse you could install on your system than McAfee.  If you have it installed I would like to reinstall Windows it's a Goner.  The uninstall tool likely will not solve everything.

  I'm not "understand why, you need to install Windows 7 64-bit just to make a less than 10 Windows upgrade when you have a much better install directly Clean install Windows 10 Upgrade , then activate directly with the product key Windows 7."

  As to reactivate Office, wait until you get 10 windows up and then make the activation of the phone to help build just to install an Office (or 3 If you have a 3-pack of office, also).   Otherwise, you will have to redo the reinstallation of upgrade.

• I would like to know if there is any way I can remove the 32-bit and keep the 64-bit without harming my computer

  I ran windows 7 installation on my computer using DVD who had 32 and 64-bit data and for that I currently have 32-bit and 64-bit installed in my computer. So I would like to know if there is any way I can remove the 32 bit and keep the 64 bits without harming my computer or stored data because now both bits is eating space on my C drive/partition!

  OT:

  Windows

  Why do you think you have "32-bit and 64-bit" versions of Windows 7 installed?

  If you installed the 64-bit version (which you will need if your computer has more than 4 GB of RAM and you want to use all of this RAM), you can see a few references to 32-bit architecture.  The 64 bit version of Windows needs these files in order to run software that is designed for 32-bit architecture.

  Perhaps the most obvious instance is the presence of the following two directories:

  C:\Program Files and C:\Program Files (x 86).  It is normal for both of these directories present in a 64-bit system.

  Maybe this will help--> 32-bit and 64-bit Windows: frequently asked questions

• Updated the motherboard, processor and RAM and upgraded to Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit, after upgrade the external hard drive encrypted with bitlocker will not enter the password.

  Original title: bitllocker Windows 7 issue

  Hello

  I recently updated my motherboard, processor and RAM, but I kept my original 500 GB hard drive, and equipped with a hard drive 2 TB extra, after the upgrade, I downloaded windows 7 ultimate 64-bit. After the upgrade I plugged my external hard drive (which has all my stuff important on it, that is to say the photo, video etc.) to realize that I had he encrypted with bitlocker on my old sysem. It allows Me to enter my password, it looks for a USB flash drive key, I did not. My question is:

  Can I replace my old system with the old motherboard, hard drive and the original RAM to remove the external hard drive for bitlocker?

  I still have the file windows.old on my hard drive, I have to restore it and remove the most recent version of windows 7 off the drive. I do this before I rebuild my old PC? I'm stuck here and would not lose all my photos (the wife would kill me!) I would appreciate your help.

  Hello

  Reassembly of the old computer won't help. You will always need the key to open the Bitlocker.

  You can read the articles and check:

  What is the difference between BitLocker Drive encryption and EFS file system?

  Protect your files using BitLocker Drive encryption

  In Windows 7 BitLocker Drive Encryption: frequently asked Questions

  Hope the helps of information. Let us know if you need help with Windows related issues. We will be happy to help you.

• Can you install Oracle 11 g 32 bit and 64 bit clients on the same machine AIX 6?

  We have a supplier who needs a 32-bit client on the application server which is AIX 6. We already have 11g 64 bit client installed there. So, we can install both or I am interested in a the first 64-bit client deinstall?

  Yes you can, please check the documentation: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/install.112/e24334/toc.htm#CHDIGJJB

  From Oracle Database 11 g Release 2 (11.2), the client software 64-bit does contain the binary 32 bits client. If you need the 32-bit client binaries on 64-bit platforms, then install the 32-bit binaries from the 32-bit respective client software in a separate Oracle home.

• Hi, I need help to install my creative suite 5 web premium cd on my new pc which is windows 64-bit operating system 8, thanks

  Hi, I need help to install my creative suite 5 web premium cd on my new pc which is windows 64-bit operating system 8, thanks

  copy and install from the desktop directory that contains the content of the CD.