Why an old version of a site persists even if the cache is cleared?

Similar Questions

• I can't access the latest version of a site Web although empty the cache.

  I'm seeing the latest version of a website (https://tripelago.wordpress.com/) that has been upgraded with a different font. Despite clearing the cache of Firefox, I still stubbornly only to get the old version. If I have access to the same page with chrome, I get the correct updated version - is a Firefox problem.

  Thanks cor - el a detailed and thoughtful response. The problem has been resolved finally once I disabled all add-ons. The culprit was No-Script; as I got in the whitelist WordPress.com and wp.com, it seemed that I also need to allow access to typekit.net...

• My desktop version of my site works well but the mobile and tablet versions have any overlap and the entire page. If I can't pin things that it stops?

  My desktop version of my site works well but the mobile and tablet versions have any overlap and the entire page. If I can't pin things that it stops?

  Hi Pedro,

  Make sure that when you design the phone and tablet version to keep in mind the limits of dimensions.

  Please share the url of your site for further analysis.

  Kind regards

  Akshay

• CAN´t open illustrator. He says I need to download the Java SE 6 - TIME - OLD Version. But I can´t install the older Version. What should I do?

  CAN´t open illustrator. He says I need to download the Java SE 6 - TIME - OLD Version. But I can´t install the older Version. What should I do?

  Lotte,

  Does that help?

  Win:

  http://www.Oracle.com/technetwork/Java/javase/downloads/Java-archive-downloads-javase6-419 409.le html

  Mac:

  http://support.Apple.com/kb/DL1572

  Some have found that the page can run, so it is necessary to reload the page.

  Others have found that it can depend on browser. Specifically, a switch of Safari found in one case.

• Why the old version of Flash made stay after downloading the new version?

  I downloaded the latest version of Flash, but the old version remained in my modules. I tried to deactivate the old version, but both versions have shown as disabled? Should I leave the two versions that enabled?

  Hello

  Go to your message control and uninstall the old version or uninstall both and reinstall the new version:

  • http://get.Adobe.com/flashplayer/
  • How to uninstall plugins

• Firefox is to see an older version of my site web (IE sees the current version OK)

  FireFox has been to see my web site without problem until I changed the site this morning - bed the correct (new) page IE, but FF is still reading the old page V3.015 - I tried Cntrl R, but it makes no difference - the change I made to my website was a piece a minimum of coding nothing contentious

  You must remove your Ask toolbar that interferes with your User Agent string. It is probably the cause of your problem. I assume that you are not Fx 3,015. You can get some quick specific advice but otherwise use the search box above, Firefox Help for Ask and User Agent string.

• The desktop version of my site home page displays the version of phone...

  Hello

  The customer agrees to push the live site with office and versions of phone that worked perfectly.

  But, until the site is online, when we connect with a pc or a mac, the site shows the version of the phone from the site.

  Someone has an idea of the problem?

  Thanks (and sorry for my English)...

  Yes, I see that the problem is solved.

  Its always advisable to check the field home layout and if its configuration with phone index page. You can check domain settings and start that is applied page by going to Site Settings > settings of the area.

  Also try to check with several browsers, as it might also be due to browser cookies.

  Thank you

  Sanjit

• Why Firefox doesn't create so many temporary files in the cache? Once it filled all space (46GB)?

  Every now and then, Firefox will have created zillions of directories and the files cached in the directory for a Firefox profile. The directories are called 0 (zero) and F (using the hexagonal as numbers names, i.e.g), and within each of them will be more directories (with two names of hexadecimal digit). The last time this happened (2 weeks ago), these directories ate ALL my free space on the hard drive (about 46 GB of a value).

  Why does this happen? Can I stop it from happening? If so, how?

  Thank you.

  Yes, it should be easy reset.

  It can be put in

  • Options-> | Advanced | --> | Network | -> Web content caching
    Management of auto-cache to replace]
  • See #w cached web-contentweb-content-_cached

  Probably your auto adjustment has been replaced and the box should uncheck.

  I know that Firefox split cache up like this IIRC it allows faster cache and solves fragmentation issues.

  46GB which seems a surprising amount and cannot be good if he eats all the hard disk space. I also know that the file places.sqlite is a variable size, but it is based on the system in use.

  The regular HTTP cache is also defined without doubt intelligently, but can be replaced by the user
  This has some background info

  • https://developer.Mozilla.org/en-us/docs/HTTP_Caching_FAQ
  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/browser.cache.disk.capacity

  My own settings seen in everything: support are

  browser.cache.disk.capacity	358400
  browser.cache.disk.smart_size_cached_value	266240
  browser.cache.disk.smart_size.first_run	false
  

  My use of the cache is limited to about 350 MB

• Firefox sometimes want to load the version 3.6.4 update even if the version is already 3.6.4

  Firefox want to update the version 3.6.4 even if the version is already 3.6.4
  and if she won't update, he's looking for server but nothing happens.

  This has happened

  Don't know how many times

  == update version 3.6.4

  Thanks to the efforts of current development on Firefox 3.6.4, there was several versions with the same version number (3.6.4) published as automatic updates for users of the beta like you.

  I see that you do not use the latest version, which was made on 5/27 (you run a generation 5/23).

  I don't understand the problem you are experiencing with software update (Please specify), but try this:

  After closing Firefox, delete the files in the folder updates and updates\0 :
  C:\Users\ < user > \AppData\Local\Mozilla\Firefox\Mozilla Firefox\updates
  C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\updates\

  Then try the update again.

  If this fails, download the latest version from http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-beta.html and install it.

  See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Software_Update (Software Update doesn't work does not correctly)

• Can I see previous/old versions of my site with BC?

  I have made changes to a customers Web site but need to return to the other oldest. Does anyone know how to do this with BC?

  I managed to find a version archived on my creative cloud account

• I need to get the old version of Photoshop cc 2014.  At the moment I have cc 2015 trial version

  I need an older version of Photoshop cc 2014

  Yes you must have a subscription to the creative cloud download the previous version of the Application.

• Why can't I see my site in Muse after the publication of Business Catalyst?

  I published a BC website trade... .but want to go back and make changes to Muse - but the site is no longer in Muse? Can anyone help?

  Hello

  When you create the layout of the site using Adobe Muse, you actually create a file of Muse that you may have saved locally in your computer. To perform updates on the hosted site on BusinessCatalyst, you can open the same file of muse, apply your changes and download their business using catalyst publish button.

  However, if by chance you missed to save the Muse in the case, or it has been lost or deleted, I fear that this is not not possible to make updates via Adobe Muse then. You must design the same layout in Muse again or you can update the site using IBE or through HTML Code.

  Let me know if you have additional questions related to it.

• Unable to remove the old version of Java - 6 30 to install the new version...

  runing XP Pro... When I try to remove in Add / REMOVE get a message "error application of transformations" any idea how to fix

  Hi, JHE4,

  1:

  (a) delete the Program Files folder.

  Location: C:\Program Files\

  (b) remove the common files folder.

  Location: C:\Program Files\Common Files\

  Step 2:

  Important: This section, method, or task contains steps that tell you how to modify the registry. However, serious problems can occur if you modify the registry incorrectly. Therefore, make sure that you proceed with caution. For added protection, back up the registry before you edit it. Then you can restore the registry if a problem occurs. For more information about how to back up and restore the registry, click on the number below to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/322756

  Remove entries from the registry program.

  (a) go to start and type regedit.exe.

  (b) find the underside a place given and delete the folder

  Location: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\Java

  Once uninstalled java completely try to reinstall the same and check what is happening.

  Re: error application of transformations

  http://www.Java.com/en/download/help/error_applying_transforms.XML

• Hello, you have disabled JavaScript or an old version of Adobe Flash Player. Download the latest version of the Flash player.

  I get this error message every Helen I try to use youtube.  I try to download Flash player and it tells me that it is not supported in 64-bit mode.  Y at - it a solution?

  The solution is the responsibility of Adobe. They say they are working on the issue. When it will be solved, Adobe can only say.

  Meanwhile, in the start menu. All programs, you have a 32 and 64 bit Internet Explorer listed? I think you should as it is what, in a 64-bit Win7 machine. Otherwise, use the 32-bit when necessary, or all the time until the flash player issue is resolved. I put IE shortcuts on my taskbar for the 32 and 64-IEs. Bruce Hagen MS - MVP [Mail]

• NFS ODA persists even after the update applied

  Good morning guys,

  We have improved our ESXi Hypervisor from 5.1 to 5.5 U1 last weekend. I have read on the NFS ODA bug and downloaded the update scheduled to apply last nigth.

  ~ # software esxcli vib install d ' "/ vmfs/volumes/4f27d555-e55efb08-0da4-d4ae52723fbc /ESXi550 - 201407001.zip".

  Result of the installation

  Message: The update completed successfully, but the system must be restarted for the changes to be effective.

  Restart required: true

  VIBs installé : VMware_bootbank_esx-base_5.5.0-1.28.1892794, VMware_bootbank_lsi-mr3_0.255.03.01-2vmw.550.1.16.1746018, VMware_bootbank_lsi-msgpt3_00.255.03.03-1vmw.550.1.15.1623387, VMware_bootbank_misc-drivers_5.5.0-1.28.1892794, VMware_bootbank_mtip32xx-native_3.3.4-1vmw.550.1.15.1623387, VMware_bootbank_net-e1000e_1.1.2-4vmw.550.1.15.1623387, VMware_bootbank_net-igb_5.0.5.1.1-1vmw.550.1.15.1623387, VMware_bootbank_net-tg3_3.123c.v55.5-1vmw.550.1.28.1892794, VMware_bootbank_rste_2.0.2.0088-4vmw.550.1.15.1623387, VMware_bootbank_sata-ahci_3.0-18vmw.550.1.15.1623387, VMware_bootbank_scsi-megaraid-sas_5.34-9vmw.550.1.28.1892794, VMware_bootbank_scsi-mpt2sas_14.00.00.00-3vmw.550.1.15.1623387-VMware_locker_tools-light_5.5.0-1.28.1892794

  VIBs supprimés : VMware_bootbank_esx-base_5.5.0-0.0.1331820, VMware_bootbank_lsi-mr3_0.255.03.01-1vmw.550.0.0.1331820, VMware_bootbank_lsi-msgpt3_00.255.03.03-1vmw.550.0.0.1331820, VMware_bootbank_misc-drivers_5.5.0-0.0.1331820, VMware_bootbank_mtip32xx-native_3.3.4-1vmw.550.0.0.1331820, VMware_bootbank_net-e1000e_1.1.2-4vmw.550.0.0.1331820, VMware_bootbank_net-igb_2.1.11.1-4vmw.550.0.0.1331820, VMware_bootbank_net-tg3_3.123c.v55.5-1vmw.550.0.0.1331820, VMware_bootbank_rste_2.0.2.0088-4vmw.550.0.0.1331820, VMware_bootbank_sata-ahci_3.0-17vmw.550.0.0.1331820, VMware_bootbank_scsi-megaraid-sas_5.34-9vmw.550.0.0.1331820, VMware_bootbank_scsi-mpt2sas_14.00.00.00-3vmw.550.0.0.1331820-VMware_locker_tools-light_5.5.0-0.0.1331820

  After the reboot of the host and reassemble our NFS (used for backup VMs using ghettoVCB.sh), ODA issues are persistent that I checked on the /var/log/vobd.log this morning:

  2014-07 - 10 T 11: 00:58.757Z: [APDCorrelator] 46073957136us: [vob.storage.apd.start] device or file with identifier [a643d5cd-6c9ea269] system has entered the State of all the paths down.

  2014-07-10 T 11: 00:58.757Z: [APDCorrelator] 46073957584us: [esx.problem.storage.apd.start] device or filesystem with identifier [a643d5cd-6c9ea269] has entered the State of all the paths downwards.

  2014-07-10 T 11: 02:45.898Z: no correlator for vob.vmfs.nfs.server.disconnect

  2014-07-10 T 11: 02:45.898Z: [vmfsCorrelator] 46181098984us: [esx.problem.vmfs.nfs.server.disconnect] 192.168.100.83/mnt/HD/HD_a2/VMBACKUP a643d5cd-6c9ea269-0000-000000000000 D-Link

  2014-07-10 T 11: 03:18.758Z: [APDCorrelator] 46213958621us: [vob.storage.apd.timeout] device or filesystem with identifier [a643d5cd-6c9ea269] has entered the State of all the paths down Timeout after being in the State of all the paths downwards for 140 seconds. E/s will now be quickly failed.

  2014-07-10 T 11: 03:18.758Z: [APDCorrelator] 46213959037us: [esx.problem.storage.apd.timeout] device or filesystem with identifier [a643d5cd-6c9ea269] has entered the State of all the paths down Timeout after being in the State of all the paths downwards for 140 seconds. E/s will now be quickly failed.

  2014-07-10 T 11: 07:40.806Z: [APDCorrelator] 46476006085us: [vob.storage.apd.exit] device or filesystem with identifier [a643d5cd-6c9ea269] left the State of all the paths downwards.

  2014-07-10 T 11: 07:40.806Z: no correlator for vob.vmfs.nfs.server.restored

  2014-07-10 T 11: 07:40.806Z: [APDCorrelator] 46476006585us: [esx.clear.storage.apd.exit] device or filesystem with identifier [a643d5cd-6c9ea269] left the State of all the paths downwards.

  2014-07-10 T 11: 07:40.806Z: [vmfsCorrelator] 46476006474us: [esx.problem.vmfs.nfs.server.restored] 192.168.100.83/mnt/HD/HD_a2/VMBACKUP a643d5cd-6c9ea269-0000-000000000000 D-Link

  So, anyone has an idea about this?

  Thanks in advance.

  Hey fabio_brizzolla,

  Well the first thing I found was that the D - Link DNS-320 is not on the hardware compatibility list VMwares, however some other versions are, so unless I missed something I couldn't find it, which means that there could be unexpected behavior of the installation.

  Having said that, your other editing that are the same, they all work well on a 5.0 update x is just installing 5.5 that you are having problems with?